DOCSLIB.ORG

Can Dnsps Change? Or Should Councils Take Control?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Can DNSPs Change? or Should Councils take control? IPWEA Smart Lighting Conference March 2017 This is Ironbark Councils only Real Action only Ironbark’s mission is to facilitate real action for councils around Australia. Why take control? Tasmania • Hobart and Glenorchy • Launceston & region – Tariff and roll out negotiation • Rolling • LGAT Program underway • Council owns, DNSP maintains • Council option to put maintenance to market Tasmania - How? SA: An (Incomplete) Short History 1998 SA Lighting: A Short History 2006 SA Lighting: A Short History 2006-2014 Safe and Sustainable Lighting 2014 Action. SA - How? Victoria 72 Councils | 269,319 Lights Ararat Rural City Council Hepburn Shire Council Mount Alexander Shire Council Banyule City Council Hindmarsh Shire Council Moyne Shire Council Bass Coast Shire Council Hobsons Bay City Council Murrindindi Shire Council Baw Baw Shire Council Horsham Rural City Council Nillumbik Shire Council Bayside City Council Hume City Council Northern Grampians Shire Council Benalla Rural City Council Indigo Shire Council Port Phillip City Council Boroondara City Council Knox City Council Pyrenees Shire Council Brimbank City Council Latrobe City Council South Gippsland Shire Council Buloke Shire Council Loddon Shire Council Southern Grampians Shire Council Campaspe Shire Council Macedon Ranges Shire Council Stonnington City Council Cardinia Shire Council Manningham City Council Strathbogie Shire Council Casey City Council Mansfield Shire Council Swan Hill Rural City Council Central Goldfields Shire Council Maribyrnong City Council Towong Shire Council Colac-Otway Shire Council Maroondah City Council Wangaratta Rural City Council Corangamite Shire Council Melbourne City Council Warrnambool City Council Darebin City Council Melton City Council Wellington Shire Council East Gippsland Shire Council Mildura Rural City Council West Wimmera Shire Council Frankston City Council Mitchell Shire Council Whitehorse City Council Gannawarra Shire Council Moira Shire Council Whittlesea City Council Glen Eira City Council Monash City Council Wodonga City Council Glenelg Shire Council Moonee Valley City Council Wyndham City Council Greater Bendigo City Council Moorabool Shire Council Yarra City Council Greater Dandenong City Council Moreland City Council Yarra Ranges Shire Council Greater Shepparton City Council Mornington Peninsula Shire Council Yarriambiack Shire Council Vic - How? What is the best outcome? Sharing Information Community Energy Groups Specific Projects Councils take control... 1. Collaborate 2. Define clear outcomes with multiple pathways to success 3. Do the numbers 4. Negotiate until the numbers make sense 5. Deliver ...DNSPs change 1. Treat councils like customers 2. Provide pathways to deliver 3. Be willing to negotiate 376,658 Lights and 102 Councils 68. Mornington Peninsula Shire Council 1. Ararat Rural City Council 34. Greater Dandenong City Council 69. Mount Alexander Shire Council 2. Armidale Dumaresq Council* 35. Greater Shepparton City Council 70. Moyne Shire Council 3. Ashburton Shire* 36. Guyra Shire Council* 71. Murrindindi Shire Council 4. Banyule City Council 37. Gwydir Shire Council* 72. Nillumbik Shire Council 5. Bass Coast Shire Council 38. Hawksbury City Council 73. Northern Grampians Shire Council 6. Baw Baw Shire Council 39. Hepburn Shire Council 74. Northern Midlands Council 7. Bayside City Council 40. Hindmarsh Shire Council 75. Parramatta City Council 8. Benalla Rural City Council 41. Hobart City Council 76. Penrith City Council 9. Blacktown City Council 42. Hobsons Bay City Council 77. Port Phillip City Council 10. Blue Mountains City Council 43. Holroyd City Council 78. Pyrenees Shire Council 11. Boroondara City Council 44. Horsham Rural City Council 79. Richmond Valley Council 12. Break O’Day Council 45. Hume City Council 80. South Gippsland Shire Council 13. Brimbank City Council 46. Indigo Shire Council 81. Southern Grampians Shire Council 14. Brisbane City Council 47. Inverell Shire Council* 82. Stonnington City Council 15. Buloke Shire Council 48. Ipswich City Council* 83. Strathbogie Shire Council 16. Campaspe Shire Council 49. Karratha City Council* 84. Surf Coast Shire Council 17. Cardinia Shire Council 50. Knox City Council 85. Swan Hill Rural City Council 18. Casey City Council 51. Latrobe City Council 86. Tenterfield Shire Council* 19. Central Goldfields Shire Council 52. Launceston City Counci 87. The Hills Council 20. Clarence Valley Council 53. Liverpool City Council 88. Town of Port Headland* 21. Coffs Harbour City Council 54. Loddon Shire Council 89. Towong Shire Council 22. Colac-Otway Shire Council 55. Manningham City Council 90. Walcha Council* 23. Corangamite Shire Council 56. Mansfield Shire Council 91. Wangaratta Rural City Council 24. Darebin City Council 57. Maribyrnong City Council 92. Warrnambool City Council 25. East Gippsland Shire Council 58. Maroondah City Council 93. Wellington Shire Council 26. Fairfield City Council 59. Meander Valley Council 94. West Tamar Council 27. Frankston City Council 60. Melton City Council 95. West Wimmera Shire Council 28. Gannawarra Shire Council 61. Mildura Rural City Council 96. Whitehorse City Council 29. Glen Eira City Council 62. Mitchell Shire Council 97. Whittlesea City Council 30. Glen Innes Severn Council* 63. Moira Shire Council 98. Wodonga City Council 31. Glenelg Shire Council 64. Monash City Council 99. Wyndham City Council 32. Glenorchy City Council 65. Moonee Valley City Council 100. Yarra City Council 33. George Town Council 66. Moorabool Shire Council 101. Yarra Ranges Shire Council 34. Greater Bendigo City Council 67. Moreland City Council 102. Yarriambiack Shire Council Last Word Phil Hewett (Charles Sturt Council in SA): “Councils and network providers are always going to be married to each other. You can’t avoid that.” “There’s a time and a place for a more adversarial approach but collaboration is required to get things done". Thankyou Paul Brown 0419 501 494 [email protected] Select the Click on Rate this presenter in your session Rate presenter, content and overall presentation and click schedule and Done. click resource.
Recommended publications
  • Regional Development Victoria Regional Development Victoria

    Regional Development Victoria Regional Development Victoria

    Regional Development victoRia Annual Report 12-13 RDV ANNUAL REPORT 12-13 CONTENTS PG1 CONTENTS Highlights 2012-13 _________________________________________________2 Introduction ______________________________________________________6 Chief Executive Foreword 6 Overview _________________________________________________________8 Responsibilities 8 Profile 9 Regional Policy Advisory Committee 11 Partners and Stakeholders 12 Operation of the Regional Policy Advisory Committee 14 Delivering the Regional Development Australia Initiative 15 Working with Regional Cities Victoria 16 Working with Rural Councils Victoria 17 Implementing the Regional Growth Fund 18 Regional Growth Fund: Delivering Major Infrastructure 20 Regional Growth Fund: Energy for the Regions 28 Regional Growth Fund: Supporting Local Initiatives 29 Regional Growth Fund: Latrobe Valley Industry and Infrastructure Fund 31 Regional Growth Fund: Other Key Initiatives 33 Disaster Recovery Support 34 Regional Economic Growth Project 36 Geelong Advancement Fund 37 Farmers’ Markets 37 Thinking Regional and Rural Guidelines 38 Hosting the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development 38 2013 Regional Victoria Living Expo 39 Good Move Regional Marketing Campaign 40 Future Priorities 2013-14 42 Finance ________________________________________________________ 44 RDV Grant Payments 45 Economic Infrastructure 63 Output Targets and Performance 69 Revenue and Expenses 70 Financial Performance 71 Compliance 71 Legislation 71 Front and back cover image shows the new $52.6 million Regional and Community Health Hub (REACH) at Deakin University’s Waurn Ponds campus in Geelong. Contact Information _______________________________________________72 RDV ANNUAL REPORT 12-13 RDV ANNUAL REPORT 12-13 HIGHLIGHTS PG2 HIGHLIGHTS PG3 September 2012 December 2012 > Announced the date for the 2013 Regional > Supported the $46.9 million Victoria Living Expo at the Good Move redevelopment of central Wodonga with campaign stand at the Royal Melbourne $3 million from the Regional Growth Show.
  • Talking Tablelands with Adam Marshall MP Your Member for Northern Tablelands

    Talking Tablelands with Adam Marshall MP Your Member for Northern Tablelands

    May 2016 Talking Tablelands with Adam Marshall MP your Member for Northern Tablelands Year off to a good start THE past few months have been incredibly busy and very fruitful in regard to some wonderful funding which has come our region’s way for infrastructure upgrades and support for Work underway on $60 million community organisations. In January I had the pleasure of meeting members from Armidale Hospital redevelopment 22 community organisations across the Northern Tablelands successful in gaining $300,000 through the Community Building Partnership. It’s one of the highlights of my role to be able to – Main construction on track to start July this year help facilitate these grants and a pleasure to talk to the people who are so passionate about improving outcomes for their local communities. I WAS delighted to visit the work site at the central sterilising supplies department and a new I recently took the Roads Minister Duncan Gay on a tour of Armidale Rural Referral Hospital where several and expanded critical care unit. the region to press the case for some major road works that, if buildings have been demolished to make way for Pleasingly, 6,000 of the Armidale blue bricks implemented, will give a huge boost to the local economy. a new four-storey structure, as part of the $60 from the former infectious diseases ward I’m continuing to knock on the Regional Development Minister’s million redevelopment building have been preserved and will be used door to garner support for the additional $6.3 million Armidale It’s a wonderful milestone for the Armidale in the construction of the new building – a Dumaresq Council needs to upgrade the regional airport and road community and one which has been long- wonderful way to blend the old with the new at links.
  • Locals' Delicious

    Locals' Delicious

    Sentinel-TimesTUESDAY, MAY 26, 2020 COVERING SOUTH GIPPSLAND AND BASS COAST Huge Island cash grab – See inside Locals’ delicious Kardella-based beef farmers Josh Butt and Jyoti Blencowe won their first major industry award last week, when they produce were named among the state’s top ‘paddock’ producers. SEVERAL South Gippsland Rob Monk shared in the glory practitioners in Melbourne through Melbourne-based spe- producers have been recog- in the dairy category, with milk alongside running the farm, the ciality butchers, Meatsmith, nised in the 2020 Delicious from his Fleckvieh herd form- husband and wife team were but Josh said the award may Awards, a celebration of new, ing the basis of a prizewin- encouraged to be included in provide the push they’ve need- innovative, and consistently ning fresh lactic curd cow’s the esteemed list of Delicious ed to explore local and online outstanding Australian ingre- milk cheese from the West award winners, despite their retail options. dients. Gippsland-based Butterfly Fac- unusual take on beef produc- “We’re still in the early stages With prizes for each state’s tory. tion, centred on fattening up and selling directly would be top producers across four cat- Kardella-based beef produc- retired dairy cattle, which has a big step up in the amount egories, Corner Inlet fisher- ers Josh Butt and Jyoti Blen- “been met with many a raised of time and work involved, so man and last year’s ‘Producer cowe took out a gong in the eyebrow”. we’re taking it slowly for now,” of the Year’ Bruce Collis was ‘Paddock’ category, their first “It’s good to know that in a he said.
  • Melbourne Supply Area–Extractive Industry Interest Areas Review

    Melbourne Supply Area–Extractive Industry Interest Areas Review

    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review Geological Survey of Victoria Technical Record 2003/2 A. Olshina & P. Burn Bibliographic reference: Olshina, A. & Burn, P., 2003. Melbourne Supply AreaExtractive Industry Interest Areas Review. Geological Survey of Victoria. Technical Record 2003/2. Geological Survey of Victoria. Ó Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 2003 Geological Survey of Victoria ISSN 1324 0307 ISBN 1 74106 838 X Keywords: extractive industry, quarry, planning, Melbourne, Victoria, stone resources, sand resources This report may be purchased from: The authors would like to thank Gayle Ellis for Business Centre, proofreading and typesetting this report. Department of Primary Industries Eighth Floor, 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, 3002 Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the Or accessed at: State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/ that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and For further technical information contact: therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or Manager, other consequences which may arise from you relying Geological Survey of Victoria, on any information in this publication. P O Box 500 East Melbourne 3002. Acknowledgments: Many of the original concepts and planning policies used in this report were developed by Barbara Guerin and the Environment and Natural Resources Committee (ENRC) and by Frank Jiricek, formerly of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. The following MPD staff contributed to this document: Ben White provided significant assistance to the consultation process for this report. Roger Buckley and Linda Bibby provided valuable input to the contents of this report.
  • Register of Committees 2020/2021

    Register of Committees 2020/2021

    REGISTER OF COMMITTEES 2020/2021 Tamworth Regional Council Register contains the committees that have Council representation including: Council Special Purpose Committees, Council Working Groups, External Boards, Committees, Working Groups and Organisations External Boards, Committees, Working Group and Organisations for Council Staff Only. Tamworth Regional Council Ray Walsh House 437 Peel Street PO Box555 TAMWORTH NSW 2340 02 6767 5555 02 6767 5499 Tamworth Regional Council Register of Council Committees 2020/2021 1. CONTENTS 1. COUNCIL SPECIAL PURPOSE COMMITTEES ........................................................... 4 1.1. Annual Donations Programme ................................................................................... 4 1.2. General Managers Performance Review Panel ......................................................... 5 1.3. Murrami Poultry Broiler Farm Development Community Liaison Committee .............. 6 1.4. Tamworth Regional Floodplain Management Committee .......................................... 7 1.5. Tamworth Regional Local Traffic Committee ............................................................. 8 1.6. Tamworth Regional Rural Fire Service Liaison Committee ........................................ 9 1.7. Tamworth Sports Dome Committee ......................................................................... 10 2. COUNCIL WORKING GROUPS .................................................................................. 11 2.1. Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee ................................................................
  • Identifying Metro Melbourne Restricted Postcodes

    Identifying Metro Melbourne Restricted Postcodes

    Identifying metro Melbourne restricted postcodes This tool is to help businesses identify metropolitan Melbourne postcodes. BLUE are restricted postcodes and GREY should be asked whether they are from within a restricted metropolitan zone. Follow our checklist below. 1. Ask for the customer’s ID 2. Check the postcode on the ID against the list of postcodes below 3. If the postcode is not highlighted in BLUE or GREY, then you can have them dine in or proceed with the service 4. If the postcode matches up with those highlighted in GREY, you should ask whether they are from a restricted metropolitan zone 5. A list of restricted suburbs and LGAs that fall within the GREY postcodes are included over the back. Customers should clarify which one they live in. 6. If the customer is from a restricted postcode or restricted suburb/LGA within the postcode then you must decline to serve them, except for takeaway 3000 - 3211 3335 - 3336 3337 3338 3340 3427 - 3429 3430 3723 3750 - 3752 3753 3754 - 3755 3757 3759 - 3761 3765 - 3775 3777 - 3779 3781 - 3787 3788 - 3815 3816 3910 - 3920 3926 - 3944 3975 - 3978 3980 3981 - 3987 Metropolitan Melbourne Metropolitan Melbourne & Regional Victoria Regional Victoria Metropolitan Regional Melbourne Victoria Do you need support? For more information on testing and support payments, Page 1 visit coronavirus.vic.gov.au or call the Business Hotline on 13 22 15 GREY postcodes Non Restricted Suburb Non Restricted LGA Restricted Suburbs Restricted LGA Toolern Vale Macedon Ranges Shire Harkness City of Melton Kurunjang
  • Gippsland Local Government Network C/- Socom Level 2, 377 Lonsdale Street Melbourne Vic 3000

    Gippsland Local Government Network C/- Socom Level 2, 377 Lonsdale Street Melbourne Vic 3000

    Gippsland Local Government Network C/- Socom Level 2, 377 Lonsdale Street Melbourne Vic 3000 Geoff Howard MLA Chair Education and Training Committee Parliament House Spring Street East Melbourne 3002 4 April 2008 Dear Mr Howard, Response to the Inquiry into Geographical Differences in the rate in which Victorian Students participate in Higher Education Thank you for the opportunity to provide input to this important review of the geographical differences in the rate in which Victorian Students participate in Higher Education and for granting the requested extension of time within which to lodge our submission. The Gippsland Local Government Network (GLGN) is an alliance of six Gippsland Councils who work collaboratively on a range of issues and projects of mutual interest. The six GLGN Councils include: Bass Coast Shire Council, Baw Baw Shire Council, East Gippsland Shire Council, Latrobe City Council, South Gippsland Shire Council and Wellington Shire Council. Together, these Gippsland Councils equate for more than a third of rural and regional Victoria. This submission is in addition to the individual responses lodged by Bass Coast Shire Council and Wellington Shire Council. It is intended to complement these previous submissions. The following comments summarise the issues that GLGN feel are important to the whole of Gippsland and consider essential for address within the inquiry. If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this submission, please do not hesitate to contact our secretariat, Kate McMillan on 8317 0111 or by email at [email protected] . Yours sincerely, Cr Neville Goodwin, Chair, Gippsland Local Government Network Mayor Bass Coast Shire Council .
  • Bass Coast Shire Council

    Bass Coast Shire Council

    BASS COAST SHIRE COUNCIL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2015 – 2025 Version: 1.0 Date of issue: August 2015 Prepared For Bass Coast Shire Council 74 McBride Avenue Wonthaggi Prepared by Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd 18-38 Siddeley Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Acknowledgement Bass Coast Shire Council wishes to acknowledge the community’s generous contribution of their time to the development of this report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Bass Coast Shire is the fastest growing local government area in Gippsland with the resident population of about 30,000, increasing to over 70,000 during peak holiday periods (www.forecast.id.com.au). The area also attracts visitors to Philip Island Nature Parks and the Motor Cycle Grand Prix and is well renowned for its special natural environment, with eco-tourism opportunities and major motorsports events attracting millions of visitors every year. The generation of waste is expected to increase in the future in line with projected population increases, which has been predicted to rise to approximately 45,000 by 2031, an increase of approximately 42%. This, coupled with a number of identified waste management challenges and issues provides significant drivers for consideration of a new waste management strategic direction and sustainability initiatives across the Shire. Purpose The Waste Management Strategy (WMS) has been developed as part of the commitment Bass Coast Shire Council has made to provide sustainable solutions for the collection, disposal and resource recovery from waste generated within the community. The Strategy’s main purpose is to guide the management of waste over the next 10 years, 2015 - 2025.
  • ROAD MANAGEMENT PLAN Amended 2020

    ROAD MANAGEMENT PLAN Amended 2020

    ROAD MANAGEMENT PLAN Amended 2020 Mansfield Shire Council Version 5.1 Endorsed June 2020 Mansfield Shire Council Road Management Plan – Amended 2020 This page has been intentionally left blank i Mansfield Shire Council Road Management Plan – Amended 2020 Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 PURPOSE OF THE RMP .......................................................................................................... 3 2.3 RMP AVAILABILITY ................................................................................................................ 3 3 ROAD USERS RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................. 4 3.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS .............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 ROAD USERS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................ 4 3.3 LEGISLATIVE CONTROL .......................................................................................................... 5 3.3.1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1989 ................................................................................ 5 3.3.2
  • Yarra Ranges Shire Council

    Yarra Ranges Shire Council

    Final Report Energy Efficiency in My Street: Reducing energy use in Yarra Ranges one street at a time ••: -s, ' Yarra Ranges Council Australian Government Yarra Ranges Shire Counci Department of Industry and Science 2 March 201 This activity received funding from the Australian Government 2IPage Contents Contents 3 Executive Summary 4 Project Objectives 5 Project Energy Efficiency Activities 6 Project Demonstration and Communication Activities 7 Outcomes and Benefits of the Project 10 Communication Outcomes 10 SEIFA Community Benefits 12 Project Budget 16 Project Management and Delivery 18 Challenges and Learn ings 19 Conclusion 21 Declaration 22 Appendix 1: Final Financial Report & Declaration 23 Appendix 2: Switch & Save Brochure 25 The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of the Commonwealth of Australia, and the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for any information or advice contained herein. 3 'Page Executive Summary Located on metropolitan Melbourne's eastern fringe, Yarra Ranges is home to a population of 145,000 and covers the largest area of any metropolitan council. Spanning approximately 2,500 square kilometres, the municipality stretches from the densely populated outer suburbs up into the surrounding foothills, agricultural valleys and forested areas of the Great Dividing Range. It is one of Victoria's largest, most varied and scenic municipalities. There are more than 55 suburbs, townships, small communities and rural areas in the Yarra Ranges. The Energy Efficiency in my Street: Reducing energy use in Yarra Ranges one street at a time project set out to upgrade old and inefficient streetlights in specific disadvantaged communities across the municipality. Apart from improving the amenity of local streets, the project sought to demonstrate that investing in energy efficiency can be an effective way of reducing day to day running costs.
  • Gwydir Shire Council Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents

    Gwydir Shire Council Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents

    Gwydir Shire Council Annual Report 2017 Table of Contents Council Statements and Values 4 Section 2: Statutory Reporting Requirements 105 Welcome 5 Amount of Rates and Charges Written off in 2016/2017 106 Mayor Introduction 8 Total Cost of Councillor Expenses in Relaton to Civic Functions 106 Details of contracts over $150 000 107 General Manager Report 9 Details of overseas travel 107 Summary of Legal Proceedings 107 Our Council Area 11 Summary of Resolutions Made Under Section 67 – Private Land 108 Gwydir Shire Council at a Glance 12 Financial Assistance to Others – Section 356 109 Gwydir Shire Council Organisation Structure 13 External Bodies who Exercised Functions Delegated by Council 110 Our Elected Council 14 Statement of all entities that Council held a controlling Interest 111 How the Annual Report is Structured 15 Statement of all entities in which Council participated 111 Equal Employment Management 112 Section 1: Record of our Achievements Over 2016/17 17 General Manager Review Package 112 Our Financial Achievements 18 Senior Staff Members Remuneration Package 112 Our achievements in Social Services 20 Statement of Stormwater Management Services Provided 112 Our achievements in Aged Care 28 Statement of Activities Companion Animals Act 1998 and Reg 2008 114 Our achievements in Technical Services 31 Statement of Government Information Act 2009 and Reg 116 Our achievements in Building Services 39 Planning Agreements Under The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 116 Our achievements in Water Operations 41 Public Interest
  • Local Plumbing Regulators in NSW On-Site Plumbing and Drainage Compliance and Inspections

    Local Plumbing Regulators in NSW On-Site Plumbing and Drainage Compliance and Inspections

    Local plumbing regulators in NSW On-site plumbing and drainage compliance and inspections This document outlines who performs the functions of the plumbing regulator in NSW. Under the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011 NSW Fair Trading is the plumbing regulator in New South Wales. The Plumbing Code of Australia is the technical standard for compliance throughout NSW. It is the responsibility of the plumbing regulator in each area to set requirements for inspections of on-site plumbing and drainage. Fair Trading’s area of operation includes all areas in which properties are provided with services (either drinking water, recycled water or a sewerage service) by Sydney Water Corporation or Hunter Water Corporation. This area of operation stretches from Gerringong in the south (the Illawarra), to Newcastle, Port Stephens and Dungog in the north (the Hunter), and west to Mount Victoria (Blue Mountains). The function of the plumbing regulator has been delegated by Fair Trading to local councils, county councils, or other qualified bodies. The delegation of the function has been accepted by local and county councils across NSW, with a small number of exceptions where the council declined the delegation. Below are two tables identifying the local authority for plumbing regulator functions, including conducting inspections, throughout NSW by local government area. Please Note: Onsite plumbing and drainage work does not include stormwater, fire suppression; work on network utility assets or roof plumbing. If you are a plumber or drainer in regional