Decisão Em Recurso Administrativo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decisão Em Recurso Administrativo DocuSign Envelope ID: AB9496B1-CABC-4273-984B-3246A19F8BFC #pública RESPOSTA AO PEDIDO DE RECONSIDERAÇÃO Licitação Eletrônica n° 2020/003 Trata-se de Pedido de Reconsideração da empresa “GLOBAL WEB OUTSOURCING DO BRASIL LTDA” para que seja revista a decisão quanto indeferimento de seu Recurso publicado no site da Ativos (www.ativossa.com.br) em 22/05/2020. DO RECEBIMENTO DO PEDIDO DE RECONSIDERAÇÃO O referido Pedido de Reconsideração não possui previsibilidade no Edital da Licitação Eletrônica nº 2020/003, nem no Regulamento de Licitações e Contratos da Ativos ou na própria Lei nº 13.303/2016. Contudo, o presente Pedido será conhecido somente na forma de simples petição, por expresso comando constitucional (art. 5º, inciso XXXIV, alínea “a” da Carta Magna). DAS RAZÕES DO PEDIDO A empresa Global Web apresenta o Pedido em comento, expondo suas razões técnicas para que seja reconsiderada a decisão de indeferimento de seu Recurso e que manteve como vencedora do certame em comento a empresa NETMANAGEMENT INFORMÁTICA LTDA. Diante disso, requer que a análise do seu Pedido seja feita pela área técnica da ATIVOS S.A. uma vez que suas considerações possuem cunho eminentemente técnico. DA ANÁLISE DA ÁREA TÉCNICA DAS ARGUMENTAÇÕES DO PEDIDO A análise da Área Técnica consta do arquivo anexo. DA DECISÃO Ante todo o exposto, considerando a manifestação da Área de Técnica da ATIVOS S.A., não será acolhido o pedido de reconsideração interposto pela empresa GLOBAL WEB OUTSOURCING DO BRASIL LTDA, e será mantida a decisão de ter a empresa NETMANAGEMENT INFORMÁTICA LTDA. como vencedora da Licitação Eletrônica nº 2020/0003. Não obstante, em relação ao requerimento para ter acesso à declaração constante no item 6.3.2 do Termo de Referência - Anexo 01 do Edital, informamos que as referidas documentações serão disponibilizadas no site da ATIVOS S.A. www.ativossa.com.br para conhecimento de todos os interessados. Brasília/DF, 15 de junho de 2020. Jussara Lopes de Jesus Dourado Responsável pela Licitação 15/06/2020 SEPN 508 – Conjunto C – 2º Andar – Asa Norte – Brasília/DF – CEP 70.740-543 1 / 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 25ECDAE6-68B6-4C21-A62C-04A11652DC38 MANIFESTAÇÃO TÉCNICA PEDIDO DE RECONSIDERAÇÃO DA EMPRESA GLOBALWEB LICITAÇÃO ELETRÔNICA Nº 2020/003 A Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI – Gesit da Ativos S.A. vem através deste relatório se manifestar quanto ao pedido de reconsideração apresentado pela empresa GlobalWeb, quanto a decisão da Ativos S.A. em habilitar e declarar vencedora da Licitação Eletrônica Nº 2020-003, a licitante Netmanagement Informática Ltda. Para melhor entendimento das argumentações, o relatório apresenta cópia editada do documento apresentado pela GlobalWeb, onde intercalamos nossa manifestação, em destaque, a cada parágrafo que entendemos ser necessária a nossa manifestação. Assim, seguimos com nossa análise: “PEDIDO DE RECONSIDERAÇÃO da decisão a qual restou determinado o indeferimento do Recurso interposto pela empresa GLOBALWEB e a manutenção da empresa NETMANAGEMENT INFORMÁTICA LTDA. como vencedora do certame, pelas razões a seguir expostas. A finalidade do presente pedido é expor razões para esta nobre Pregoeira reconsiderar a sua decisão que habilitou e declarou vencedora a licitante Netmanagement, vez que a empresa comprovou a sua qualificação técnica na Prova de Conceito no ambiente da nuvem pública da AWS, porém pretende executar os serviços com provedor diverso, fato que ocasionará prejuízo na prestação dos serviços e consequente danos ao erário público. Como as considerações aqui delineados possuem cunho eminentemente técnico, requer o envio do presente Pedido para a devida análise da área técnica da ATIVOS S.A. Ademais, com fundamento no princípio da publicidade, requer o acesso à Declaração de Parceria constante no item 6.3.2 do Edital a ser apresentada pela empresa NETMANAGEMENT INFORMÁTICA LTDA. para a almejada contratação dos serviços. 1. DA SÍNTESE DOS FATOS. Trata-se de Pregão eletrônico promovido por este órgão cujo objeto é a contratação de empresa especializada na prestação de serviços de computação, contemplando servidores virtuais para hospedagem de aplicações desenvolvidas pela ATIVOS S.A., suas subsidiárias e por terceiros, banco de dados, aplicativos servidores, solução de segurança, monitoramento e suporte técnico especializado (Datacenter). DocuSign Envelope ID: 25ECDAE6-68B6-4C21-A62C-04A11652DC38 Após a sessão pública de lances a proposta da Netmanagement ficou classificada em primeiro lugar sendo que, após a análise da documentação de habilitação, a empresa foi classificada para a próxima fase do certame. Para fins de comprovação da capacidade técnica e operacional da licitante na execução dos serviços de computação em nuvem foi realizada a Prova de Conceito (POC), momento no qual a Netmanagement apresentou a sua solução em ambiente da nuvem pública do provedor AWS. Aberto o prazo para apresentação das razões recursais, a Globalweb, classificada em segundo lugar, apresentou recurso onde, em síntese, insurge- se contra a decisão que procedeu à habilitação da Recorrida vez que, na Prova de Conceito, apresentou solução com a utilização do provedor de nuvem AWS, sendo que não é parceria e não logrará êxito na comprovação de parceria com a AWS no ato da assinatura do contrato.” Manifestação da Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI da Ativos S.A. Observando o princípio da boa-fé, a Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI – Gesit, entende que, conforme item 6.3.2 do Termo de Referência – Anexo 01 do Edital 2020-003, a empresa Netmanagement Informática Ltda teria prazo para comprovação de parceria até o momento da assinatura do contrato, não sendo exigida pela Ativos S.A. a sua apresentação em prazo antecipado. Após vieram as contrarrazões da Netmanagement onde defende, em apertada síntese, que não há relação obrigatória entre o provedor de nuvem utilizado na Prova de Conceito e o provedor que emite a declaração constante no item 6.3.2 do Termo de Referência, visto que tal exigência não é determinada pelo Edital. Porém, em nenhum momento, rechaça a alegação que não é parceira AWS. Ademais, afirma que a ATIVOS possui o poder de escolha quanto ao provedor a ser utilizado. Manifestação da Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI da Ativos S.A. A Gesit acompanha o entendimento da empresa Netmanagement, “que não há relação obrigatória entre o provedor de nuvem utilizado na Prova de Conceito e o provedor que emite a declaração constante no item 6.3.2 do Termo de Referência, visto que tal exigência não é determinada pelo Edital” e reforça que o momento em que foram apresentados os recursos da GlobalWeb e as contrarrazões da Netmanagement, não era exigida a apresentação da declaração de parceria. Por fim, a decisão dessa nobre Pregoeira indeferiu o recurso da Globalweb e manteve a habilitação da Netmanagement. Ocorre que, conforme restará comprovado, a decisão merece ser reconsiderada. Em resumo, a decisão afirma que a Prova de Conceito teve por finalidade conhecer a expertise da empresa na execução das atividades das ordens de serviço, e não de conhecer o provedor de nuvem pública. E, dessa forma, a DocuSign Envelope ID: 25ECDAE6-68B6-4C21-A62C-04A11652DC38 declaração de parceira a ser apresentada no momento da assinatura do contrato poderá não ser, necessariamente, a declaração de parceria com a AWS. Ocorre que, em que pese os relevantes argumentos da decisão, uma vez apresentada solução com provedor líder do mercado, o Órgão não receberá a mesma qualidade quando da execução dos serviços caso seja utilizado outro provedor. Além disso, conforme será demonstrado, os demais provedores constantes no Quadrante Mágico do Gartner não atendem plenamente os itens do Edital. Manifestação da Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI da Ativos S.A. A Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI – Gesit elaborou o Termo de Referência do Edital 2020-003 observando as melhores práticas do mercado de serviços de computação em nuvem pública, adequada a necessidade da Ativos S.A.. No processo de prospecção, para formulação de nosso documento, buscamos conhecimentos em editais do TCU, do MPOG e da Petrobras, além de debatermos com representantes de provedores como AWS, Microsoft Azure e IBM. O nosso entendimento é que o Edital em referência deu plenas condições à participação dos vários provedores de serviços de computação em nuvem, proporcionando diversidade e competitividade ao processo. Diante desse fato, com o devido respeito, a Globalweb entende que a decisão que manteve a habilitação da Netmanagement não merece prosperar, uma vez que os primados balizadores das contratações públicas restarão fulminados. Por oportuno, cabe ressaltar que a reconsideração que ora se pleiteia não representa qualquer ilegalidade por parte desta Comissão, porquanto preserva o princípio da economicidade, da busca pela melhor proposta para a Administração Pública e da vinculação ao instrumento convocatório, bem como assegura a efetividade ao item 6.3.15.2 do Edital e demais pertinentes ao adequado atendimento às ordens de serviços. 2. DA DECISÃO DE HABILITAÇÃO DA EMPRESA NETMANAGEMENT. O que se pretende com o presente Pedido de Reconsideração é demonstrar que a solução apresentada no ambiente de uma nuvem pública líder no mercado, a AWS, não terá o mesmo desempenho com a utilização de outros provedores, mesmo que estejam no Quadrante Mágico do Gartner e, pior, não haverá o atendimento aos itens preconizados no Edital. Ademais, será demonstrado que o valor da proposta da vencedora necessariamente importará na apresentação de sua nuvem privada que, igualmente, não atende ao Edital. Manifestação da Gerência de Suporte e Infraestrutura de TI da Ativos S.A. A Gesit reconhece a excelência do provedor AWS, mas entende que há outros “players” no mercado de prestação de serviços de computação em nuvem, como Microsoft Azure, Oracle, IBM e outros e o nosso Edital foi elaborado, como já dissemos, possibilitando a participação e atendimento das necessidades da Ativos S.A. por todos. Acreditamos que a competitividade proporcionada por nossa especificação, resultou em processo economicamente viável, com grande redução do preço em relação a referência de preço obtida pela ativos S.A.
Recommended publications
  • Extensibility to Future and Legacy Technology
    Extensibility to Future and Legacy Technology CONNECTING MULTIPLE CLOUDS TO LONG-STANDING IT INFRASTRUCTURE SECTION ONE Bridging the Old with the New | Tensions from Legacy to Cloud ENTERPRISE IT MUST INTEGRATE MULTIPLE EXISTING SYSTEMS WITH NEWER CLOUD SERVICES. “With new on-premises public cloud stacks entering the picture, there is a distinct possibility of a significant surge in private cloud deployments over the next five years.” - Kuba Stolarski, research director, Infrastructure Systems, Platforms and Technologies at IDC [email protected] www.cloudbolt.io 2 As a result of rapid growth in digital Expansion transformation initiatives, enterprises Infrastructure and resources are inherited and agencies now have infrastructure through mergers and acquisitions, as are that spans both private and public the processes used to manage them. This cloud environments along with legacy leads to an inevitable mix of different technology in their data centers. This vendors and technologies under the explosion of multiple, heterogeneous responsibility of central IT. The challenge infrastructure environments is due to is to figure out what to consolidate and at least one or more of the following what to migrate to new environments. reasons: Security Public Cloud Evolving backup and disaster recovery Agile developers and individuals from scenarios have dramatically changed for lines of business have been self- where and what gets stored as well as a provisioning resources, sometimes outside plethora of highly availability scenarios for of central IT control. They use public resilience. All these approaches contribute cloud providers for many of their new to more infrastructure sprawl and initiatives while much of the existing complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • View Whitepaper
    INFRAREPORT Top M&A Trends in Infrastructure Software EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE 7 1.1 Size of the Prize 7 1.2 The Evolution of the Infrastructure (Public) Cloud Market and Technology 7 1.2.1 Original 2006 Public Cloud - Hardware as a Service 8 1.2.2 2016 - 2010 - Platform as a Service 9 1.2.3 2016 - 2019 - Containers as a Service 10 1.2.4 Container Orchestration 11 1.2.5 Standardization of Container Orchestration 11 1.2.6 Hybrid Cloud & Multi-Cloud 12 1.2.7 Edge Computing and 5G 12 1.2.8 APIs, Cloud Components and AI 13 1.2.9 Service Mesh 14 1.2.10 Serverless 15 1.2.11 Zero Code 15 1.2.12 Cloud as a Service 16 2 STATE OF THE MARKET 18 2.1 Investment Trend Summary -Summary of Funding Activity in Cloud Infrastructure 18 3 MARKET FOCUS – TRENDS & COMPANIES 20 3.1 Cloud Providers Provide Enhanced Security, Including AI/ML and Zero Trust Security 20 3.2 Cloud Management and Cost Containment Becomes a Challenge for Customers 21 3.3 The Container Market is Just Starting to Heat Up 23 3.4 Kubernetes 24 3.5 APIs Have Become the Dominant Information Sharing Paradigm 27 3.6 DevOps is the Answer to Increasing Competition From Emerging Digital Disruptors. 30 3.7 Serverless 32 3.8 Zero Code 38 3.9 Hybrid, Multi and Edge Clouds 43 4 LARGE PUBLIC/PRIVATE ACQUIRERS 57 4.1 Amazon Web Services | Private Company Profile 57 4.2 Cloudera (NYS: CLDR) | Public Company Profile 59 4.3 Hortonworks | Private Company Profile 61 Infrastructure Software Report l Woodside Capital Partners l Confidential l October 2020 Page | 2 INFRAREPORT
    [Show full text]
  • AWS Re:Invent 2019
    Research Note: AWS re:Invent 2019 Rajeev Chand Partner and Head, Research Amazon’s 8th annual re:Invent was held December 2-6, 2019, in Las Vegas. The [email protected] conference is one of the largest enterprise tech gatherings globally, second only to Salesforce’s Dreamforce. This year’s re:Invent had 65,000 attendees, which is more Olivia Rodberg than double the 30,000 attendees in 2016. Research Associate [email protected] re:Invent, as a vendor-specific conference, focused on sessions with Amazon executives, technologists, and partners introducing, discussing, and evangelizing AWS products and services. However, in hallway conversations and private meetings, attendees discussed and debated industry trends and challenges in cloud businesses Wing Venture Capital and technologies. 480 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 At this year’s conference, Wing’s research team hosted the Wing Summit: re:Invent, an exclusive, invitation-only dialogue with 40 chief information officers and chief technology officers. In addition, during two days at the conference, we held 20 one-on- meetings with Fortune 500 executives, principally vice presidents and heads of infrastructure, engineering, cloud, and data. Our takeaways included: 1) Cost economics, though frequently raised, is not the primary driver. CIOs in our pre-summit feedback most frequently raised cost economics as a topic. One CIO asked, “are cloud financials what people perceive them to be for production workloads?” Another asked, “is there a crossover point where public cloud becomes more costly than private cloud?” Another questioned, “how should we be thinking about balancing growing opex vs. capex?” Executives in our meetings emphasized that cost economics are not the primary driver for cloud adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Analysis: Disruptive Hyperscaler Cloud Service Providers
    Market Analysis: Disruptive Hyperscaler Cloud Service Providers Excerpt for Hexaware March 2021 HFS Research authors: Joel Martin, VP Cloud Strategy Martin Gabriel, Associate Director, Research The growth in cloud migration for large scale, highly secure, and resilient service delivery creates apple “opportunity for disruption in the cloud service provider marketplace. These vendors can gain share by focusing on customer experience, thought leadership, and strong cloud platform knowledge to deliver best in class customer experiences.” —Joel Martin, VP Cloud Research, HFS © 2021, HFS Research Ltd Excerpt for Hexaware Page 2 1 Introduction, methodology, and definitions 4 2 Executive report summary 12 3 Summary of provides and market opportunities 15 4 Disruptive hyperscaler cloud service provider profile 18 5 Market insights 23 6 About the authors 28 Introduction, methodology, and definitions About this report This Market Assessment report provides insights and profiles emerging, disruptive hyperscaler cloud service providers. Companies covered in this report are global, have strong partnerships with hyperscalers (cloud infrastructure companies like Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, IBM Cloud, etc.), and have dedicated teams of up to 5,000 cloud professionals. Some of these disrupters focus solely on providing hybrid and multi-cloud cloud solutions. In contrast, others are part of significantly larger organizations that bring compelling systems integration, outsourcing, and business process outsourcing solutions to market. HFS sees these companies as likely market disruptors as can pivot quickly, whereas some of the larger players may lack similar agility. Key differentiators that make these companies potential disrupters. HFS provides a market overview, key trends in the hyperscaler cloud services market, and profiles of each of these firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi Cloud Management Platforms: Practical Survey
    Multi Cloud Management Platforms: Practical Survey Marta Rozanska (University of Oslo), Daniel Seybold (Ulm University), Feroz Zahid (Simula Research Labs) Cloud Management Platform (Cloud) products that incorporate self-service interfaces, provision system images, enable metering and billing, and provide for some degree of workload optimization through established policies Source: Gartner IT Glossary – Cloud Management Platforms – http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/cloud-management-platforms Practical Guide to Cloud Management Platforms – Cloud Standards Customer Council – https://www.omg.org/cloud/deliverables/CSCC- Practical-Guide-to-Cloud-Management-Platforms.pdf 2 How do we compare CMP? • Cloud Orchestration Support • Cloud Application Support • Platform Intelligence 3 Cloud Orchestration Support • Multi-Cloud support • Resource Diversity • BYON support • Service support • Automation 4 Cloud Application Support • Modelling (language, diversity, resource selection) • Lifecycle Management • Data Management (Data creation, migration, • Workflow Support • Containerization 5 Platform Intelligence • Optimisation • Utility functions • Objective versality • Continuous reasoning • Constraints • Monitoring (system/custom metrics, aggregation) • Runtime adaptation • Event management • Data management • Dynamic Resource Offering Discovery 6 Apache Brooklyn • Is an open-source framework for modelling, deploying and managing distributed applications defined using blueprints • License: Apache 2.0 • Cloud Orchestration Support: • Uses Apache jclouds
    [Show full text]
  • Hype Cycle for I&O Automation, 2020
    Hype Cycle for I&O Automation, 2020 Published: 4 August 2020 ID: G00441834 Analyst(s): Chris Saunderson Automation is a catalyst that drives consistent quality and business agility as organizations adopt cloud computing and DevOps practices, and integrate AI capabilities. I&O leaders must leverage the technologies in this Hype Cycle to deliver faster value, improve efficiency and optimize costs. Table of Contents Analysis..................................................................................................................................................3 What You Need to Know.................................................................................................................. 3 The Hype Cycle................................................................................................................................ 3 The Priority Matrix.............................................................................................................................5 Off the Hype Cycle........................................................................................................................... 7 On the Rise...................................................................................................................................... 7 Chaos Engineering..................................................................................................................... 7 Hybrid Digital Infrastructure Management................................................................................... 8 SaaS
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Azure Snapshot
    Microsoft Azure Snapshot Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform with a vast global footprint of managed data centers that provide » Empower IT innovation software as a service (SaaS), platform as » Leverage scalable resources a service (PaaS), and infrastructure as » Simplify developer workflows a service (IaaS) offerings. The platform supports many different programming languages, tools, and frameworks, including both Microsoft-specific and third-party software and systems. Many enterprise customers are increasingly looking to shift workloads from their data centers to public cloud platforms such as Azure, which provide a specific set of templates to ensure the smooth operation of workflow processes. If an enterprise is currently using Microsoft Office 365 solutions and SharePoint, the shift to Azure is even more compelling. BALANCING INNOVATION WITH IT VISIBILITY AND CONTROL Development and engineering teams are some of the largest consumers of cloud and transient resources. As developers test applications or IT systems, they need to quickly spin up virtual machines and other resources while controlling costs. In many cases, they wind up building their own servers outside the control of IT. Because end-users can deploy complex applications to public cloud platforms, this can lead to mismanagement of resources, server sprawl, and servers vulnerable to network and cyber-attacks. Some users can become mired in complexity as they attempt to provision resources, while IT teams can lose visibility and control over those resources if a process in the workflow fails. Moreover, IT administrators and end users are challenged by what seems like an infinite number of choices that must be made before they can successfully launch and provision cloud resources and services in most public clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloudbolt AWS Datasheet
    DATASHEET Simplified Management for AWS Resources » Leverage scalable Infrastructure resources from Amazon Web resources Services (AWS) have become very popular for enterprises — providing a scalable » Simplify IT provisioning environment for mission-critical applications » Gain visibility and control and services that are dedicated or on- demand and part of an overall hybrid cloud and multi-cloud strategy. AWS resources help top enterprises innovate and achieve digital business objectives with agility. [email protected] www.cloudbolt.io 1 DATASHEET Although an excellent wellspring of resources, AWS has what seems like an infinite number of decisions to make before deploying them. IT admins and end users want to use AWS resources with the goal of not sacrificing security and performance while controlling costs so they don’t end up costing more than the value they provide. For those reasons, deploying AWS resources effectively can be daunting to even seasoned IT professionals. At the enterprise level, making the right decisions about using AWS resources can make a huge difference for the overall success of digital transformation initiatives, particularly when implementing hybrid cloud and multi-cloud strategies. CloudBolt helps IT admins move the critical and complicated aspects of deploying AWS resources behind the scenes. The entire process of requesting, deploying, and terminating virtual machines (VMs) and cloud services is more efficient for end users who are provided with an intuitive self-service IT portal and unified manager to provision and manage the resources they need. As a hybrid cloud and multi-cloud management platform, CloudBolt homogenizes access to virtualization and cloud environments to not only AWS, but also to Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and VMware vCenter.
    [Show full text]
  • Onefuse Integration Platform
    SOLUTION OVERVIEW OneFuse Integration Platform IT Governance without Development Disruption OneFuse role-based access control and policy model simplifies and improves security by defining Improve Automation Through Better Integrations parameters that create guardrails for users, use cases, and endpoints or services. Policies can be shared with specialized teams or subject matter experts with the OneFuse workspace feature, which “Poor integrations... take a $500,000 “52% of custom coded projects cost “57% of IT processes aren’t automated allows systems owners to stay in control while still being able to automate tasks in the provisioning toll on the business every year.”1 189% of their original estimate.” 2 or integrated.”3 lifecycle. As companies continue to make the shift towards more cloud infrastructure, teams are under The OneFuse console provides visibility into tools, users, APIs, and job outcomes for better auditing mounting pressure to find efficient and cost-effective solutions to address automation challenges and compliance. This removes the need to sift through logs from multiple systems to find and fix the around a growing number of clouds, toolsets, and teams. In order to be effective, these technologies problem. Job detail records are shown in the context of their policy, so it’s easy to quickly see what and teams must converge to meet the needs of the business without compromising IT governance, properties were missing or incorrect which means faster resolution as well as an improved end user compliance, and over-burdening people resources. experience. Policies protect provisioning, decommissioning and custom actions, so you can closer to 100% automation safely.
    [Show full text]
  • Google Cloud Platform Snapshot
    Google Cloud Platform Snapshot Google Cloud Platform (GCP) is a cloud computing platform with a global presence for building, testing, and » Empower IT innovation running applications and services that run » Leverage scalable resources on the same infrastructure that Google » Simplify developer workflows uses internally for its end-user products. It has led the way for Kubernetes orchestration for containerization, which has now become the enterprise standard across most cloud provider and on- premises solutions. Many enterprise customers are increasingly looking to GCP to leverage enterprise-grade hybrid cloud containerization workflows and big data analytics on demand, and for infrastructure-as-a- service (IaaS) and platform-as-a-service (PaaS). BigQuery provides a data warehouse and analytics on demand by creating a logical data warehouse over managed, columnar storage, as well as data from object storage and spreadsheets. Google has joined the other big cloud providers with serverless computing using its Cloud Functions. BALANCING INNOVATION WITH IT VISIBILITY AND CONTROL Development and engineering teams are some of the largest consumers of cloud and transient resources. As developers test applications or IT systems, they need to quickly spin up virtual machines and other resources while controlling costs. In many cases, they wind up building their own servers outside the control of IT. Because end-users can deploy complex applications to public cloud platforms, this can lead to mismanagement of resources, server sprawl, and servers vulnerable to network and cyber-attacks. End-users can become mired in complexity as they attempt to provision resources, while IT teams can lose visibility and control over those resources if a process in the workflow fails.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloudbolt Creates Unified Cloud Interface For
    CASE STUDY At a Glance CloudBolt Vitals Annual Revenue $1.8B+ Creates Unified Employees 7,300 HQ Denham, Buckinghamshire, Cloud Interface England NYSE IHG for IHG Technology InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG) is an Virtualization VMware, AWS, Azure,CenturyLink Public English multinational hotels company Cloud, Google Compute headquartered in Denham, UK. IHG has Engine, Nutanix Acropolis more than 5,000 hotels and nearly 750,000 Configuration guest rooms in almost 100 countries around Management Chef the world. Its brands include Candlewood Enterprise Ticketing Suites, Crowne Plaza, Even, Holiday Inn, ServiceNow Holiday Inn Express, Hotel Indigo, Hualuxe, IP Management Infoblox InterContinental and Staybridge Suites. Load Balancing F5 OSs RHEL, CentOS, Windows VMs 7,000+ CASE STUDY Challenge Because of the size and complexity of their IT infrastructure, IHG utilizes four different public clouds. They want the flexibility of multiple public clouds so they can use the platform that provides the optimal environment for each workload, as well as to protect themselves against price increases and instabilities in any one public cloud. The challenge this created was that administrators needed to understand and use four different interfaces to locate, manage, and provision compute resources. They have used VMware’s vRealize Automation (vRA) for managing VMware servers, but it did not provide support for all four of the public clouds that they need. Furthermore, they found vRA to be extremely time-consuming to maintain, with upgrades requiring a multi-month processes, and a large professional services cost. Finally, for the clouds vRA could deploy to, the process of installing multi-server, multi-tier apps on any one of these public clouds was onerous and required the administrator to use multiple different interfaces (the public cloud console, Chef, and the new VM itself).
    [Show full text]
  • Value, Opex for Major Software Enterprise
    CASE STUDY At a Glance CloudBolt Vitals Employees 3,000 Dramatically Annual Revenue $700 million Location Eastern United States Reduces Time-to- The Competition Value, OpEx for vRealize Automation Red Hat CloudForms Major Software Homegrown Application Enterprise Technology Virtualization VMware vCenter This enterprise designs learning and Public Cloud Amazon education software for enterprise/school Web Services groups. It’s a global leader in enterprise Configuration Manager technology and innovative solutions that Chef (multiple instances) improve the experience of millions of Orchestration vCloud students and learners around the world Orchestrator every day. Ticketing ServiceNow Operating Systems RHEL, CentOS, Windows VMs 10,000+ CASE STUDY Challenge Before CloudBolt, the enterprise relied on a complicated integration of vCloud Orchestrator, Chef, and a ticketing system to run their server provisioning processes. They struggled with slow turn- around time, a lack of governance, and difficulty understanding their costs. Solution With CloudBolt, the enterprise enabled: Faster turn-around with smart automation and integrations Dramatically faster VM provisioning and customer CloudBolt’s orchestration hooks feature enabled the onboarding times company to tightly integrate with existing workflow Chargeback/shameback with cost tracking and components. For example, InfoBlox was configured transparency across lines of business within CloudBolt for IP address management during provisioning and modification of networks. Orchestration Policies and quotas for controlling usage and access hooks also enabled CloudBolt to create ServiceNow to resources tickets when provisioning requests were approved and Deployments that conformed to company security to update those tickets as servers were modified or and operations policies deleted. CloudBolt allowed existing infrastructure to be partitioned into “environments” using characteristics such Real-time software license management and tracking as hypervisors, networks, applications, OS templates, and more.
    [Show full text]