Solutions for Government [email protected] 888.662.2724
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Blockchain-Based Local Energy Markets
Abstract CHRISTIDIS, KONSTANTINOS. Blockchain-Based Local Energy Markets. (Under the direction of Michael Devetsikiotis and Srdjan Lukic.) A growing customer base for solar-plus-storage at the grid edge has resulted in stronger interest at the regulatory level towards energy markets at the distribution level. Blockchains — systems that have been popularized recently by technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum — allow us to establish transparent marketplaces without the need for a central authority. This thesis investigates the feasibility of local energy markets (LEMs) running on blockchains, and also introduces a canonical framework for designing and evaluating blockchain-based LEMs — a first in this space. We begin by examining whether existing blockchain implementations are capable of supporting such markets. We dissect blockchains into their core components, perform an analytical survey on the space, and introduce a taxonomy for blockchain systems. Our findings suggest an impedance mismatch for our use case; we identify a number of integration issues for IoT applications, and offer workarounds where possible. Shifting back into the original goal of designing a realistic blockchain-based LEM, a common theme we find across all relevant literature is the treatment of the blockchain component as a black box. Armed with a proper understanding of the blockchain space from our earlier analysis, we make the case that this approach is flawed because the choices in this layer affect the market’s performance significantly. First, we explicitly identify the design space that the blockchain layer introduces, and analyze how the design choices made therein affect the performance, governance, and degree of decentralization of these markets. -
Extensibility to Future and Legacy Technology
Extensibility to Future and Legacy Technology CONNECTING MULTIPLE CLOUDS TO LONG-STANDING IT INFRASTRUCTURE SECTION ONE Bridging the Old with the New | Tensions from Legacy to Cloud ENTERPRISE IT MUST INTEGRATE MULTIPLE EXISTING SYSTEMS WITH NEWER CLOUD SERVICES. “With new on-premises public cloud stacks entering the picture, there is a distinct possibility of a significant surge in private cloud deployments over the next five years.” - Kuba Stolarski, research director, Infrastructure Systems, Platforms and Technologies at IDC [email protected] www.cloudbolt.io 2 As a result of rapid growth in digital Expansion transformation initiatives, enterprises Infrastructure and resources are inherited and agencies now have infrastructure through mergers and acquisitions, as are that spans both private and public the processes used to manage them. This cloud environments along with legacy leads to an inevitable mix of different technology in their data centers. This vendors and technologies under the explosion of multiple, heterogeneous responsibility of central IT. The challenge infrastructure environments is due to is to figure out what to consolidate and at least one or more of the following what to migrate to new environments. reasons: Security Public Cloud Evolving backup and disaster recovery Agile developers and individuals from scenarios have dramatically changed for lines of business have been self- where and what gets stored as well as a provisioning resources, sometimes outside plethora of highly availability scenarios for of central IT control. They use public resilience. All these approaches contribute cloud providers for many of their new to more infrastructure sprawl and initiatives while much of the existing complexity. -
Cloud Computing
JYOTI NIVAS COLLEGE PG CENTER DEPARTMENT OF MCA III YEAR TECH-ON-TAP E-JOURNAL ON CLOUD COMPUTING Issue 1, August 2020 Sl.no Title Page.no 1 Alibaba Cloud 1 2 Workday and Softchoice 2 3 Citrix Cloud Services and Nippon Data 4 4 Softlayer and Bluelock 6 5 IBM Cloud 7 6 Oracle Cloud 9 7 BackBlaze and Jira Cloud 10 8 SnowFlake 11 9 AWS Kiinesis and Verizon Cloud 12 10 Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) 13 11 Google Cloud and Navtech Platform 14 12 Tresorit 16 13 Massive Grid and Egnyte 17 14 Microsoft Azure and Cloud-myNav 19 15 Box and OpenStack 20 16 Kamatera and SAP-S/4 Hana Cloud 22 17 Cloud Ways and Adobe Service 24 18 Cloud Sigma and Prolifics 25 19 MessageOPS - Cloud Service Provider 27 20 pCloud Service Provider 28 21 CtrlS and Zendesk 29 22 Century link and Service Now 31 23 Milesweb 33 24 Zoom Cloud 35 25 Collibra 36 26 GoDaddy and Amazon Web Services 37 27 Ubiquity Hosting and Mage Cloud 39 CLOUD SERVICE PROVIDERS Kushmetha k. A(18MCA08) Brunda S(18MCA05) Cloud Service Providers are the companies that offer network services, infrastructure or the business applications in the cloud. These cloud services are hosted in a data center using network connectivity that can be accessed by companies or individuals. Few different forms of services that can be used in the cloud by the CSPs include Software as a Service(SaaS), Platform as a Service(PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service(IaaS). Alibaba Cloud: It is a chinese cloud computing company founded in 2009 by Jack Ma and Simon Hu. -
Industry Trends in Cloud Computing
Industry Trends in Cloud Computing David Dempsey • Felicity Kelliher Industry Trends in Cloud Computing Alternative Business-to-Business Revenue Models David Dempsey Felicity Kelliher Salesforce School of Business Dublin, Ireland Waterford Institute of Technology Waterford, Ireland ISBN 978-3-319-63993-2 ISBN 978-3-319-63994-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63994-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017955977 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. -
View Whitepaper
INFRAREPORT Top M&A Trends in Infrastructure Software EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE 7 1.1 Size of the Prize 7 1.2 The Evolution of the Infrastructure (Public) Cloud Market and Technology 7 1.2.1 Original 2006 Public Cloud - Hardware as a Service 8 1.2.2 2016 - 2010 - Platform as a Service 9 1.2.3 2016 - 2019 - Containers as a Service 10 1.2.4 Container Orchestration 11 1.2.5 Standardization of Container Orchestration 11 1.2.6 Hybrid Cloud & Multi-Cloud 12 1.2.7 Edge Computing and 5G 12 1.2.8 APIs, Cloud Components and AI 13 1.2.9 Service Mesh 14 1.2.10 Serverless 15 1.2.11 Zero Code 15 1.2.12 Cloud as a Service 16 2 STATE OF THE MARKET 18 2.1 Investment Trend Summary -Summary of Funding Activity in Cloud Infrastructure 18 3 MARKET FOCUS – TRENDS & COMPANIES 20 3.1 Cloud Providers Provide Enhanced Security, Including AI/ML and Zero Trust Security 20 3.2 Cloud Management and Cost Containment Becomes a Challenge for Customers 21 3.3 The Container Market is Just Starting to Heat Up 23 3.4 Kubernetes 24 3.5 APIs Have Become the Dominant Information Sharing Paradigm 27 3.6 DevOps is the Answer to Increasing Competition From Emerging Digital Disruptors. 30 3.7 Serverless 32 3.8 Zero Code 38 3.9 Hybrid, Multi and Edge Clouds 43 4 LARGE PUBLIC/PRIVATE ACQUIRERS 57 4.1 Amazon Web Services | Private Company Profile 57 4.2 Cloudera (NYS: CLDR) | Public Company Profile 59 4.3 Hortonworks | Private Company Profile 61 Infrastructure Software Report l Woodside Capital Partners l Confidential l October 2020 Page | 2 INFRAREPORT -
AWS Re:Invent 2019
Research Note: AWS re:Invent 2019 Rajeev Chand Partner and Head, Research Amazon’s 8th annual re:Invent was held December 2-6, 2019, in Las Vegas. The [email protected] conference is one of the largest enterprise tech gatherings globally, second only to Salesforce’s Dreamforce. This year’s re:Invent had 65,000 attendees, which is more Olivia Rodberg than double the 30,000 attendees in 2016. Research Associate [email protected] re:Invent, as a vendor-specific conference, focused on sessions with Amazon executives, technologists, and partners introducing, discussing, and evangelizing AWS products and services. However, in hallway conversations and private meetings, attendees discussed and debated industry trends and challenges in cloud businesses Wing Venture Capital and technologies. 480 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 At this year’s conference, Wing’s research team hosted the Wing Summit: re:Invent, an exclusive, invitation-only dialogue with 40 chief information officers and chief technology officers. In addition, during two days at the conference, we held 20 one-on- meetings with Fortune 500 executives, principally vice presidents and heads of infrastructure, engineering, cloud, and data. Our takeaways included: 1) Cost economics, though frequently raised, is not the primary driver. CIOs in our pre-summit feedback most frequently raised cost economics as a topic. One CIO asked, “are cloud financials what people perceive them to be for production workloads?” Another asked, “is there a crossover point where public cloud becomes more costly than private cloud?” Another questioned, “how should we be thinking about balancing growing opex vs. capex?” Executives in our meetings emphasized that cost economics are not the primary driver for cloud adoption. -
Softlayer Technologies, Inc
SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SOC 3 SYSTRUST FOR SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS REPORT SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATFORM SERVICES RELEVANT TO SECURITY AND AVAILABILITY TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS .......................................................................................... 1 MANAGEMENT’S ASSERTION REGARDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS CONTROLS OVER THE PLATFORM SERVICES BASED ON THE AICPA TRUST PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA FOR SECURITY AND AVAILABILITY ...................................................................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTION OF SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S PLATFORM SERVICES ............................... 3 BOUNDARIES OF PLATFORM SERVICES ................................................................................................ 5 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS To the Management of SoftLayer Technologies, Inc.: Scope We have examined management’s assertion that SoftLayer Technologies, Inc. (SoftLayer) during the period November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014, maintained effective controls over the Platform Services (described in the attached system/service description) to provide reasonable assurance that: the system as defined, was protected against unauthorized access (both physical and logical); and the system as defined, was available for operation and use as committed or agreed; based on the criteria for security and availability set forth in the AICPA’s TSP Section 100, Trust Services Principles, Criteria, and Illustrations -
Rfp Template for Selecting a Micro-Segmentation Solution
RFP TEMPLATE FOR SELECTING A MICRO-SEGMENTATION SOLUTION This Request for Proposal template is comprised of common requirements and questions from buyers when selecting a solution for micro-segmentation. Use it to identify your solution criteria, clarify unknowns, and prioritize potential trade-offs. SECTION 1: COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT 1.01 Does the solution support workloads deployed on bare-metal (physical servers)? Are there any limitations? 1.02 Which OS platforms are supported (Windows, Linux, AIX, Solaris, etc.)? Are there any limitations? 1.03 Does the solution support workloads deployed as virtual machines on any virtualization platform or hypervisor? Which hypervisors are supported? Do you have feature parity among hypervisor support? Please explain any feature parity if it exists. 1.04 What public clouds are supported (AWS, EC2, S3, Azure, GCP)? Are there any limitations with each provider that the solution supports? Do you have feature parity among various providers? 1.05 What private cloud stacks are supported (IBM SoftLayer, Nutanix, etc.)? Are there any limitations? 1.06 Does the solution support workloads deployed as containers? Which container platforms are supported? Describe how the solution supports, visualizes, and secures containers. 1.07 Does the solution work on any network infrastructure without dependencies on hardware, such as VMware servers or Cisco switches, or requiring changes to the network? 1.08 Is the solution able to recognize and secure homegrown and legacy applications? If yes, how does it do this? SECTION 2: VISIBILITY 2.01 Does the solution provide an operations-level “big picture” view of locations with interactive drill-down capabilities for segmentation administration? 2.02 Does the solution provide an application-centric view of the connectivity and relationships of applications and their workload components? Note: This is an application dependency map, not a network map. -
Selected HW&Co. TMT Transactions
Technology, Media & Telecom Update June 2013 Contents What We’ve Been Reading………………… 2 Highlighted M&A Transactions…………… 3 • Mobile Makes Up 15% Of All Internet Traffic • IBM To Acquire SoftLayer Technologies • Dell Special Committee Investor Presentation • Yahoo! To Acquire Tumblr • Video To Dominate Mobile Data Traffic • Dassault Systems Acquires Apriso • Security Software Market Grew 7.9 % In 2012 • McAfee To Acquire Stonesoft • EMR And HIE See Big Adoption Numbers • Healthland Acquires American HealthTech U.S. TMT M&A Overview………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 U.S. TMT Initial Public Offerings……………………………………………………………………………….. 5 TMT Public Market Overview…………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Public Market Trading Statistics by Vertical Bellwethers………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Data and Information Services…………………………………………………………………………... 7 Internet and Digital Media……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 IT and Tech-Enabled Services…………………………………………………………………………… 9 Software – Application…………………………………………………………………………………. 10 Software – Infrastructure……………………………………………………………………………….. 11 Software as a Service (“SaaS”) ………………………………………………………………………… 12 Selected HW&Co. TMT Transactions………………………………………………………………………….. 13 Group Harris Williams & Co.’s Technology, Media & Telecom (TMT) Group is dedicated to providing superior merger & Overview acquisition and capital markets advisory services to market leading companies through dedicated TMT professionals. Below is a list of our senior TMT contacts. Boston San Francisco London +1 (617) 482-7501 +1 -
Market Analysis: Disruptive Hyperscaler Cloud Service Providers
Market Analysis: Disruptive Hyperscaler Cloud Service Providers Excerpt for Hexaware March 2021 HFS Research authors: Joel Martin, VP Cloud Strategy Martin Gabriel, Associate Director, Research The growth in cloud migration for large scale, highly secure, and resilient service delivery creates apple “opportunity for disruption in the cloud service provider marketplace. These vendors can gain share by focusing on customer experience, thought leadership, and strong cloud platform knowledge to deliver best in class customer experiences.” —Joel Martin, VP Cloud Research, HFS © 2021, HFS Research Ltd Excerpt for Hexaware Page 2 1 Introduction, methodology, and definitions 4 2 Executive report summary 12 3 Summary of provides and market opportunities 15 4 Disruptive hyperscaler cloud service provider profile 18 5 Market insights 23 6 About the authors 28 Introduction, methodology, and definitions About this report This Market Assessment report provides insights and profiles emerging, disruptive hyperscaler cloud service providers. Companies covered in this report are global, have strong partnerships with hyperscalers (cloud infrastructure companies like Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, IBM Cloud, etc.), and have dedicated teams of up to 5,000 cloud professionals. Some of these disrupters focus solely on providing hybrid and multi-cloud cloud solutions. In contrast, others are part of significantly larger organizations that bring compelling systems integration, outsourcing, and business process outsourcing solutions to market. HFS sees these companies as likely market disruptors as can pivot quickly, whereas some of the larger players may lack similar agility. Key differentiators that make these companies potential disrupters. HFS provides a market overview, key trends in the hyperscaler cloud services market, and profiles of each of these firms. -
Multi Cloud Management Platforms: Practical Survey
Multi Cloud Management Platforms: Practical Survey Marta Rozanska (University of Oslo), Daniel Seybold (Ulm University), Feroz Zahid (Simula Research Labs) Cloud Management Platform (Cloud) products that incorporate self-service interfaces, provision system images, enable metering and billing, and provide for some degree of workload optimization through established policies Source: Gartner IT Glossary – Cloud Management Platforms – http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/cloud-management-platforms Practical Guide to Cloud Management Platforms – Cloud Standards Customer Council – https://www.omg.org/cloud/deliverables/CSCC- Practical-Guide-to-Cloud-Management-Platforms.pdf 2 How do we compare CMP? • Cloud Orchestration Support • Cloud Application Support • Platform Intelligence 3 Cloud Orchestration Support • Multi-Cloud support • Resource Diversity • BYON support • Service support • Automation 4 Cloud Application Support • Modelling (language, diversity, resource selection) • Lifecycle Management • Data Management (Data creation, migration, • Workflow Support • Containerization 5 Platform Intelligence • Optimisation • Utility functions • Objective versality • Continuous reasoning • Constraints • Monitoring (system/custom metrics, aggregation) • Runtime adaptation • Event management • Data management • Dynamic Resource Offering Discovery 6 Apache Brooklyn • Is an open-source framework for modelling, deploying and managing distributed applications defined using blueprints • License: Apache 2.0 • Cloud Orchestration Support: • Uses Apache jclouds -
Hype Cycle for I&O Automation, 2020
Hype Cycle for I&O Automation, 2020 Published: 4 August 2020 ID: G00441834 Analyst(s): Chris Saunderson Automation is a catalyst that drives consistent quality and business agility as organizations adopt cloud computing and DevOps practices, and integrate AI capabilities. I&O leaders must leverage the technologies in this Hype Cycle to deliver faster value, improve efficiency and optimize costs. Table of Contents Analysis..................................................................................................................................................3 What You Need to Know.................................................................................................................. 3 The Hype Cycle................................................................................................................................ 3 The Priority Matrix.............................................................................................................................5 Off the Hype Cycle........................................................................................................................... 7 On the Rise...................................................................................................................................... 7 Chaos Engineering..................................................................................................................... 7 Hybrid Digital Infrastructure Management................................................................................... 8 SaaS