DOCSLIB.ORG

(U-Ro. R3sb. Ma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(U-Ro. R3sb. Ma U_seof forlg Standar.dsfor pSeceOf$cers D iby: SusanOuo.*^y,4r"rf$t Counrf Attomey Introduction T'bisitttelligence brie,f addresset; the legal standards applied by the courtsin useof forceclairns broughtby ment.irllyor emotionallydisturbed threats against law enforcementor correctionsdeputies. Duringtlie lastf(,w years the courtshave becorne increasingly concemed about law enforcementand conectionsoffict,:rs using for,:e to controlthe actions of emotionallyancl mentally disturbed arrestees and-inmates, Although the cr:ufts have not yetmandated that law enforcementagencies implement differentuse of li;rcepolicier; for dealingwith mentallyill arresteesor inmatesthan the policiesused for de-alinggenerally with arrest,:resor inmates, the courts have indicated that the mentdl state of thethreat is oneof ths factorsthat must tre considered under a totalityof tlie circumstancestest, Forpurposes of this menlo,tlueats have been categorized b),thlee stages in thecriminal justice pr{)cess each of whichcarries its own respectil'r:constitutional rights: (l) thethleat on thestreet in an arrestsiruation, (2) the threatin custodypost-anest, but pre-a.r:raignment, and (3) thetlueat post-an'aignrnent, either pre-or post conviction.Gene,r6lly, the saLme legal standard applies on the streetand during post-arrest, pre- anaignmentcustody, that is, lawful forceis thatforce which is objectivelyreasonable fl'om the peace officer'sperspective at thetime the forceis use<l.. In thepost-arraignment stage, Iawful forceis that forcethal. does n< t sliockthe conscience and is not rnaliciousor sadistic,but ratheris usedin a good faitheffort to ma;rintainorder ancl restore discipline. Receirtc0urt decisions make it cleartliat onelbctor affecting the courts'decisions regarding whetherthe use of forceis otrjectivelyreasonable is whetherthe peace officer knew or shouldhave knolvnthat the lhreat wasrnentally or emotionallydisturbed at thetirne the force was used and whetherin light r:1'thatknowledge, the peaceofficer should have taken different actions. In theNinth Circuit, thecourl couldfind thatan emotionaliydisturbed person's level of lesistancemight befter be metwith counselrng,than with physicalcontrol tactics. I-Iowever, the mental and/or ernotional state of thethreat has less significance in casesarising post-arraignment with pre-sentenceor convictedinmates. tionallv D ts: On the Str and Arraisnment TileNintir Circuithas not adopteda per serule establishing two differentclassifications of suspects:mentall'/ disabled persons and serious criminals, Nor hasthe Ninth Clircuitadopted a requirementfor t\v'odifferent use of forcepolicies for thosetwo classifications.lnstead, the Ninth Circuithas mphat ized that lv,[tere it is or shouldbe apparentto the officersthat the individual involvedin a rtserf forceis r:nentallyor emotionallydisturbecf the threat's mental or emotionalstate is a factorthat ntust b': considered.in determining'rxtthe.reasonableness of the forceemployed." (Emphasis added)Deorle v. ,t\utherfdyd,'272F.3d1Z7Z,l2B3 (9th Cir. 2001). TheCourt reasoned ttrat while pliysicalcontrol tactics can be successfullyused in subduing criminalthreats, ,e,motionally disfurbed threats might become more agitated with the useof thosesame tactic;s: PLAINTIFF'S .clt EXHIBIT I Ig (u-ro.r3sB. Ma I rlJse Page2 of force:,. Emotionailyor MentalryDisturbed rtu.eats 'l'he problem.sposed by, and thus the tactics to be employedagainst, an unamted,errrotionally distraught individual wlro is creatingu disrurbun.. cr resistinganest are ordinariiy different frorn those involved in law , tlnforcementefforts to subduean armedand dangerous criminal who has rocentlycommitted a seriousoffense. In theformer instance, increasing tlteuse of forcemay, in somecircumstances at least, exacerbate the srituation; in drelatter, a heighteneduse of less-than-lethalforc;e will ttliuallybe helpfulin bringinga dangeroussituation to a swift end.ln the crseof mentrillyunbalanced persons, the use of officersand others frained irr the.art_ofc,ounseiingis ordinarily advisable, where feasible, and may lri ovidethe bestmeans of endinga crisis.(citation omifted) Deorle,272F'3c:l at 1282-1283.Theref,rre, using physical control on an ernotionaliydisfurbed person whpis displafrL,r; static,active, or ontinouslevJs oiresistance(in a forcecontinuum) without an imminentthreat r:f physical.harrn may be unreasonable. Moreover, the Deorlecase indicates that peace officersshould ei.therhave s'ome skills ,ceveloped for dealingwith mentallyand e,notionatty distur-bed threats,other tharrthe use of'physical crlntrol iactics, or shouldhave ready access to persons,e.g., counselors,who lo havesuch skills. Of course,,where a split seconddecision must be made clue to a threatposed by an emotionally disturbedpersont, the normaluse of f<rroedefensive tactics are appropriate regardiess of thetl:reat,s mental or emotional stability'. It tvill be theheatrnent of theemolionuily distu-rbed person by thepeace officerprior to t):repoint w}rern the threat poses an imminent threat of physicalharm which mayiead a court questiorr to whetherit wasreasonable to useforce or if theactions.iaken by thepeace officer provoked theerrL'r,ltionally disn"rrbed person thereby escalating the situation an,i pr,rvoi<i'g a violent episode. Thesame oSjectively reasonable stanclard that appiies during an arrest,applies inside the jail 9:Tg^tl.lost-amest,_-pre-anaignmentstage of custody.P; erce v. Multnomai iiunty, 76 F.3d 1032, 1042.(9'" Cir' l9!,16).The For:rthAmenclment protection against seirue thatbegils *iti, *n initiaistop continues untiltbe detaineereceives a judiciai determination on probable asin circumstances ottthe "uur"lJust street,kno'wing that thetbreat is emotionallydisturbed cun make a peaceofficer "accountable for lravlngtreated 'Was'tioe,290[atrernotionality distrubed tlreat] asa dangerousprisoner rather than a sick one."Gibson v. County of F,:id 1175,1198(gtl'Cir.2002), As with streetencounters, couns appear ro expe)ct a tactical<:iifference inL the levelof forceapplied to anemotionally disturbeci tLeat in p&ranest, pre-anailynnentcusf9rJy. ional turbed Post-ar rnent:Pre-sent Convic mates Auseofflr>rcethatsh.cckstlreconscienceis..condu.ti@'thut camot justifie,,J ***" be by anygo'r'emment interest basedon thetotality of the circumstancesat the time' Countyof {i,tcramentov. Lewis,523U.S. 833,849 (1986). Two excessiveforce claims that exist in ajail seftingare a FourteenthAmendment substantive due procrrs claim by pre-triaidetainees, and an Eighth Amendmt:,ntcruel and unusual punishment claim by inmates.The legalstandard for bothclaims is a shocks-the-ccnscience standard. The legal sigrrificance of themental or emotionalstate of a post- anaignmentdeta:iliee is lessenedby the government'sstrong interest in jail securiry,. Page3 (Jseof force., Emotionallyor MentailyDisturbed rhreats In a use'f for:ceclaim broughtby a post-anaignmentdetainee, the Ninth circuit hasfound that "Fc'rc€ doesnot amountto a constifutionalviolation iiit is appliedin a goodfaith effon to rest're discipline.andotder 'maliciously Tdlgl andsadistically foi ihevery purpose of causingharm.,,i Clgmentr. QsTn:p2,298F.3d 898, 903 19'h Cir, 2002)(ciiingWittey-v.-Al|ers,475 U.S. ltz,lzo-zt (1986)). Besider;the use of fbrcecontinuum elements, addltional factors affecting whether the use of forcewas constirutional include: a the extenlof injury inflicted*** a whetherthe useof fcrrcecould plausibly have been thought necessary, *:** theextent of thetlueat to thesafety of staffand inmates, as reasonably perceivedby theresponsible officials on thebasis of the factsknown ., to them, and n at'y efforLsmade to temperthe severify of a foreefulresponse.. Witl ey,47:t U.S. zrt32.1 o Thereis :noclear direction from the Ninth Circuitor the SupremeCourt on exactlyhow the mentalor emotionalstate of a ttrreatcould affect legal analysis under the "shocks-the-conscience" standard,if at ali I-Iowever,given the l.linth Circuit'sgrowing concern with the mentalstate of an'estees, it is failto assumethat the emotionalor mentalstate of a threatcould be consideredby a court jury or to be a fac'torin evaluatingthe good faith of theuse of for'ceby peaceofficers. This is especially fruein light of th,t:fact that emotionally disfurbed, pre-sentence detainees have a right to restorative freatment.or. Aa'vocacyCtr, v. Mink,322F.3d1101, I lzz (gthCir. 2003)("Becauie incapacitated criminaldefendants have not beenconvicted of anycdme, they liave an inierestin fi-eedomfrom incarceration.Tb.t:y alsohave a libertyinterest in receivingresiorative ffeatment lto restoreto competencya per,son lbund unfit to proc:eedwith theirlegal defense].")(Citations ,rmitted)). Giventhe Ninth Circuit'sruling in Mink.using physical force against an emotionallydisturbed tbreatwho has nr: t receivedrestorative heatment could be determinedto-be "shoctring" if alternatives suchas counselin;g or persuaclingthe threat to voluntarilysubmit to prescribedpsychJropics were available,coui<l have been used, and would lial'e diffi.rsed the situation rnore efiectively ihan physicaf forci:,Therefore, m in casesinvolving the objectiveryreasonabielegal standard, tbe threat's emotional or mentalstate could tre a factorin the legalanalysis under a shocks-the_consbiencelegal standard involvinga pre-seintencedetainee. Ho[,ever, whether the use of forcewas a split-seconddecision necessarybecause of a threatof an itnmediatethreat of seriousphysical harm and whether or not ttreuse of forcewas necer;sary to maintainorder and discipline are alsofactors that would be consideredbv counand jury. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of Cluedo & Clue a “Contemporary” Game for Over 60 Years
    The story of Cluedo & Clue A “Contemporary” Game for over 60 Years by Bruce Whitehill The Metro, a free London newspaper, regularly carried a puzzle column called “Enigma.” In 2005, they ran this “What-game-am-I?” riddle: Here’s a game that’s lots of fun, Involving rope, a pipe, a gun, A spanner, knife and candlestick. Accuse a friend and make it stick. The answer was the name of a game that, considering the puzzle’s inclusion in a well- known newspaper, was still very much a part of British popular culture after more than 50 years: “Cluedo,” first published in 1949 in the UK. The game was also published under license to Parker Brothers in the United States the same year, 1949. There it is was known as: Clue What’s in a name? • Cluedo = Clue + Ludo" Ludo is a classic British game -- " a simplified Game of India • Ludo is not played in the U.S. " Instead, Americans play Parcheesi." But “Cluecheesi” doesn’t quite work." So we just stuck with “Clue” I grew up (in New York) playing Clue, and like most other Americans, considered it to be one of America’s classic games. Only decades later did I learn its origin was across the ocean, in Great Britain. Let me take you back to England, 1944. With the Blitz -- the bombing -- and the country emersed in a world war, the people were subject to many hardships, including blackouts and rationing. A forty-one-year-old factory worker in Birmingham was disheartened because the blackouts and the crimp on social activities in England meant he was unable to play his favorite parlor game, called “Murder.” “Murder” was a live-action party game where guests tried to uncover the person in the room who had been secretly assigned the role of murderer.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Field Sobriety Testing
    This Page Left Intentionally Blank Instructor Guide DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety (SFST) Testing Sobriety Refresher October 2015 Save lives, prevent injuries, reduce vehicle-related crashes This Page Left Intentionally Blank Preface The Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) training curriculum collectively prepares police officers and other qualified persons to conduct the SFST’s for use in DWI investigations. This training, developed under the auspices and direction of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), has experienced remarkable success since its inception in the early 1980s. As in any educational training program, an instruction manual or guide is considered a “living document” that is subject to updates and changes based on advances in technology and science. A thorough review is made of information by the IACP Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) of the Highway Safety Committee of the IACP with contributions from many sources in health care science, toxicology, jurisprudence, and law enforcement. Based on this information, any appropriate revisions and modifications in background theory, facts, examination and decision making methods are made to improve the quality of the instruction as well as the standardization of guidelines for the implementation of the SFST curriculum. The reorganized manuals are then prepared and disseminated, both domestically and internationally, to the states. Changes will normally take effect 90 days after approval by the TAP, unless otherwise specified or when so designated. The procedures outlined in this manual describe how the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) are to be administered under ideal conditions. We recognize that the SFST’s will not always be administered under ideal conditions in the field, because such conditions do not always exist.
    [Show full text]
  • To All 18F Students!
    HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE Orientation 2018 STUDENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE (At Hampshire) broad knowledge will not come predigested...it will come as a natural consequence of exploration. From The Making of a College, by Franklin Patterson and Charles Longsworth, 1965 Disoriented? Uncertain? Lost? If at any time during orientation you are lost, uncertain of where you should be, or wondering where your orientation group is meeting, or if you have any questions, please visit our ORIENTATION HELP DESK. The help desk is located in the lobby of Franklin Patterson Hall and is staffed from Friday, August 31, through Monday, September 3, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Follow all the great things happening at orientation on our social media! @NewToHamp /NewToHamp Show off your orientation experience using these hashtags: #NewToHamp | #HampOrientation Illustrations by Celeste Jacobs 14F Orientation 2018 Welcome TO ALL 18F STUDENTS! WE’RE GLAD YOU’RE HERE! Your journey at Hampshire begins with orientation, a time for you to learn about the College, meet new people, and settle in. The program you are about to take part in is designed to give you a sense of daily life on campus. Through performances, presentations, and a variety of activities, you will start to experience what it means to be a part of the Hampshire community. Orientation leaders are some of your best resources on campus. They chose to be leaders because they want to help you as you begin to establish yourself at Hampshire — take advantage of that! Remember, they’re here for you. As you participate in this weekend’s activities, there may be times when you feel overwhelmed or uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Covent Garden Offerings Crossword Clue
    Covent Garden Offerings Crossword Clue Piping and Mauritian Warren never nitrogenize his polyisoprene! Logan clerks fourth if crawling Quinton gallets or vaccinates. Norwood colliding her poi paratactically, she yean it overnight. Loughborough factory in that you learn more than you can dine with. He thoroughly enjoyed his time convince the College, making process great friends, participating in this choir. Henry exhibition of his works at the College I took immediately humbled and inspired by his positivity and passion through art. The royal institution of covent garden offerings crossword clue is networking so. In later years he started his own insurance company however was very successful. Miembros de las aves que les permiten volar. Restaurants for al fresco dining each other. London had undergone various regimes, but was cute the time restrict for the worm that the Stuarts set display in the escape for female real happiness and prosperity to net about. These roles were largely unpaid and he red a shining example of the civil marriage in action. Several of bob moved onto pastures new garden offerings crossword clue, that is not where their acquisition of. He was a story that day there are more than ronald groves. While little the College, he won some form and Classical prizes and was county school prefect. First world that they were injured or trustees will mentor those that you find an insatiable appetite for only at any more or trustees from dulwich college. Go to enquire whether as our memory and! Create more new bindings substitutor. How lucky we support from chicago by scottish highlands during his career researchers in covent garden offerings crossword clue is highly experienced boys have him all time where their houses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Case of the Nancy Drew Ghostwriter and Journalist Missing Millie Benson
    The Secret Case of the Nancy Drew Ghostwriter and Journalist MISSING MILLIE BENSON By Julie K. Rubini BIOGRAPHIES FOR YOUNG READERS Ohio University Press Athens Contents Author’s Note vii The First Clue Ghostwriter Reappears 1 The Case of the Missing Ghostwriter The Second Clue Little Ladora Girl with Big Dreams 10 The Case of the Wandering Feet The Third Clue College Days 20 The Case of the Hawkeye The Fourth Clue Next Steps 31 The Case of the Developing Writer The Fifth Clue New Name, New Character, New Beginning 39 The Case of the Ghostwriter The Sixth Clue Nancy Drew 48 The Case of the Young Detective The Seventh Clue Different Characters/Similar Lives 56 The Case of the Prolific Writer The Eighth Clue Sad Loss & New Beginning 65 The Case of the Budding Journalist v The Ninth Clue Take Off! 74 The Case of the Flying Reporter The Final Clues The Nancy Drew Conference, Recognition & Legacy 82 The Case of a Storied Life Extra Clues Millie’s Timeline 95 Millie’s Awards & Recognition 97 Millie’s Chronological List of Works 99 Glossary 107 Acknowledgments 109 Notes 111 Bibliography 119 vi Contents THE FIRST CLUE GHOSTWRITER REAPPEARS The Case of the Missing Ghostwriter or the first fifty years of the series, readers of the Nancy Drew FMystery Stories, whether of the originals with the dusty blue cloth covers or the newer books with the bright yellow spines, knew that all those mysteries were written by Carolyn Keene. But who was she? No one had ever met this talented writer, seen a photograph of her face, or heard her voice on the radio.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluedoku: Generating and Solving Clue Logic Puzzles
    Cluedoku: Generating and Solving Clue Logic Puzzles Todd Neller Monica Ranadive (‘07) History of Clue Invented by Anthony E. Pratt in 1944 Originally “Cluedo” = clue + Ludo (Latin for “I play”, Europe’s Pachisi) Cluedo production delayed to 1948 by post-war shortages Most popular deductive game Clue Game Play Goal: Deduce correct murder suspect, weapon, and room 21 cards: 6 suspects, 6 weapons, 9 rooms One card of each type selected randomly, placed unseen in case file Remaining 18 cards dealt to players (sometimes unevenly) Players assume suspect identities (irrelevant to play) Making Suggestions A player suggests a suspect, weapon, and room. Suggestion put to opponents clockwise until it is disproved by an opponent or all cannot. An opponent that can disprove, must privately reveal a card to the suggester. The suggester may suggest a card the suggester holds. Making Accusations Each player may declare one accusation in the game, checking the case file for correctness. Correct: player wins Incorrect: player loses and continues to disprove suggestions. Child’s Game? I think not! Example: There are six players. Prof. Plum showed you the wrench card. Plum also disproved these suggestions: Miss Scarlet, pipe, kitchen Mrs. Peacock, rope, billiard room Mr. Green, pipe, study What card must Prof. Plum also hold? Creating a ClueReasoner Research expanding on an Artificial Intelligence (AI) assignment How the computer solves deductive logic (search – trial and error) Simulating a Game Boardless Clue Players make suggestions in turn until a player
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Logical and Probabilistic Reasoning in the Game of Clue
    406 ICGA Journal 40 (2018) 406–416 DOI 10.3233/ICG-180063 IOS Press Mixed logical and probabilistic reasoning in the game of Clue Todd W. Neller ∗ and Ziqian Luo Department of Computer Science, Gettysburg College, PA, USA Abstract. We describe a means of mixed logical and probabilistic reasoning with knowledge in the popular game Clue. Using pseudo-Boolean constraints we call at-least constraints, we more efficiently represent cardinality constraints on Clue card deal knowledge, perform more general constraint satisfaction in order to determine places where cards provably are or are not, and then employ a WalkSAT-based solution sampling algorithm with a tabu search metaheuristic in order to estimate the probabilities of unknown card places. Finding a tradeoff between WalkSAT-heuristic efficiency in finding solution samples and the sampling bias such a heuristic introduces, we empirically study algorithmic variations in order to learn how such sampling error may be reduced. Keywords: Clue, Cluedo, at-least constraints, cardinality constraints, extended clauses, sampling, logical reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, WalkSAT, tabu search 1. INTRODUCTION Clue®1 is a mystery-themed game of deduction (Fig. 1). The goal of the game is to be the first player to correctly name the contents of a case file: the murder suspect, the weapon used, and the room the murder took place in. There are 6 possible suspects, 6 possible weapons, and 9 possible rooms, each of which are pictured on a card. One card of each type is chosen randomly and placed in a “case file” envelope without being revealed to any player. All other cards are dealt out face-down to the players.
    [Show full text]
  • The Content Threat and How to Deal with It!
    TECH PAPER The Content Threat And how to deal with it! Digital content – the essential life-blood of business and commerce – is the Meanwhile, highly sensitive government systems were employing Deep Content carrier of choice for the cyber threats used by today’s attackers. We can’t live Inspection (DCI) to block anything that was merely capable of carrying an without it, and yet we might regret handling it. attack, but even here the increasing sophistication of attacks made it impossible for the defenders to stay ahead. A Game of Cat and Mouse Cyber security has long concerned itself with the problem of digital content A Radical Transformation threat. History tells a story of an “arms race” where the attacker has continually As governments found attackers catching up with DCI, they started looking for a had the upper hand. Anti-virus came first, and polymorphic viruses were radical alternative. A technique that didn’t depend on detection to stop the developed to defeat it. Sandboxed detonation arrived and was heralded as the threat. The answer turned out to be transformation. Developed behind the saviour, promising the ultimate defence against advanced persistent threats. closed doors of the defence and intelligence community, the first visible clue of But the attackers just got on with developing evasion techniques and rendered this work came in 2004 in a patent filed by the QinetiQ team working on the UK it obsolete almost immediately. MoD’s cyber security research programme . DEEP-SECURE.COM TECH PAPER TECH PAPER This kind of defence doesn’t rely on detecting unsafe data or behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insider Threat
    RECENT INSIDER THEFT CASES U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation en Chyu Liu, a retired research scientist, was ichael Mitchell became disgruntled and was fired Wsentenced in January 2012 to 60 months in prison, Mfrom his job due to poor performance. He kept two years supervised release, a $25,000 fine and was numerous computer files with his employer’s trade secrets; ordered to forfeit $600,000. Liu was convicted in February he entered into a consulting agreement with a rival Korean company can often detect or control when an outsider (non-employee) tries to access 2011 of stealing trade secrets from his former employer company and gave them the stolen trade secrets. In and selling them to companies in China. Liu conspired March 2010, he was sentenced to 18 months in prison and company data either physically or electronically, and can mitigate the threat of an with at least four current and former employees, traveled ordered to pay his former employer over $187,000. throughout China to market the stolen information, paid outsider stealing company property. However, the thief who is harder to detect and halin Jhaveri gave trade secrets to a person he current and former employees for material and information, A and bribed a then-employee with $50,000 in cash to provide Sbelieved was an investor willing to finance a business who could cause the most damage is the insider—the employee with legitimate access. That insider a process manual and other information. venture in India, and confirmed that the information he had taken from his employer was everything he needed to start may steal solely for personal gain, or that insider may be a “spy”—someone who is stealing exue Huang was employed by two different US the business.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthony E. Pratt - Inventor of Cluedo
    Anthony E. Pratt - Inventor of Cluedo Pratt was born at 13 Brighton Road, Balsall Heath, Birmingham. He received his secondary education at St. Philip's School in Edgbaston. His favourite subject was chemistry, but he suffered from poor eyesight, which affected his education. Pratt was a gifted musician and a proficient pianist from an early age. When he left school at 15, he wanted to pursue a career in chemistry and was apprenticed to a local chemical manufacturer. But with no formal qualifications in chemistry and a growing interest in music, he went on to pursue a musical career . During the Second World War, Pratt worked in an engineering factory in Birmingham that manufactured components for tanks. Working on a drilling machine, he found the work tedious, but it gave him time to think, including about the ideas behind Cluedo. It was during the Second World War that Pratt had the idea for a murder mystery board game. The idea for Cluedo came from his days spent playing musical concerts in country hotels where part of the evening's entertainment would have been murder mystery games. These would involve both actors and hotel guests playing the characters in a plot which involved the murder of one or more of the guests. The setting was a country house with its many sprawling rooms, with guests gathered for an evening's dining and socialising, but a body was found murdered and all the guests fell under suspicion. By putting clues together, the hotel guests must solve the mystery. These were very popular games at the time, and given this along with Pratt's love of detective fiction including that of his favourites Raymond Chandler and Agatha Christie, the spark for Cluedo was created.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability Management
    VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT Clue Vulnerability Management gives you a constant overview of your IT infrastructure and it`s up-to-date security status, keeping you well-informed as to issues and threats that need to be addressed well before they become critical in any way. This enables you to shift your IT security strategy from the backfoot to the front foot. We have you covered. ! ! Vulneralbility Database Cloud Scanner Onpremise Scanner Clue Passive Scanner Customer Vulneralbility Report by CLUE Clients Datacenter Critical Systems Cyber Criminal Internal Networks ROVING WEAKNESS CLOUD SERVICES AND THREAT DETECTION The very nature of public and hybrid Cloud infrastruc- As indicated before, it is vital that modern IT infrastruc- tures requires a readdress of IT processes and, most tures are ever vigilant and effective in identifying and importantly, also their security. Classic security models resolving security threats in real time without any com- are outdated and increase risk, these are simply no lon- promise to system operations. This process should be ger reliable and not recommendable for use. Even if you precise and seamless. This is a major challenge we are outsource the operation of your virtualization and net- happy to accept. work infrastructure to providers such as Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure or local virtual data An important part of IT security strategy, therefore, is to center providers, your company remains responsible for not only identify outside threats but to identify internal securing your own operating system, installed services weaknesses and then to update and protect vulnera- and applications. ble systems. With a correct assessment of risks and dangers, the wasting of time and effort is avoided and issues are dealt with promptly and effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSPECT the Crime Wins! CARD GAME Extra Cards for the Advanced Game (Marked with a ) • 3 Orange Evidence Cards • 12 White Case File Cards
    1 Setup Contents Object of the Game ® Take all the cards marked with a • 2 Decks of Cards It’s all the intrigue of Clue®, out of the game (3x orange cards and • 1 Confidential Envelope 12x white cards). in minutes! • Illustrated Instructions The cards are only for the advanced Use your detective skills to solve the 2-4 player game. mystery and make an accusation – who did it, with what and where! The first person to solve CRIME SCENE – DO NOT CROSS SUSPECT the crime wins! CARD GAME Extra cards for the advanced game (marked with a ) • 3 orange evidence cards • 12 white case file cards 2 Your Case Files 3 The Crime 4 The Evidence IMPORTANT! • Give each player a set of 12 case Keep all your cards file cards. hidden from other SHUFFLE! • Each set is marked in the corner with a suspects players. , , or . Make sure all cards in x1 Confidential GUILTY! a set have the same symbol. Envelope Played Clue® before? x1 INNOCENT! This game is similar. 6 suspects Played Clue before? This weapons GUILTY! 1 Shuffle the rest of the evidence cards together. game is similar. You will x1 Deal them out facedown so everyone has an be trying to deduce who equal number. Spare cards go face up in the committed the crime, with what weapon middle, for all to see. and where, by asking players questions. 3 locations 2 Look at your own case file cards and evidence The first player to solve the crime wins. locations cards (including any face up in the middle).
    [Show full text]