Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 123/Tuesday, June 28, 2005/Rules and Regulations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 123/Tuesday, June 28, 2005/Rules and Regulations 37022 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. (2) If any corrosion is outside the limits BT3 9DZ, Northern Ireland. To inspect copies specified in the Accomplishment of this service information, go to the FAA, § 39.13 [Amended] Instructions of Short Brothers Service Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind I 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding Bulletin SD360–53–45, dated December Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or to the the following new airworthiness 2003, before further flight, replace the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on directive: corroded fitting with a new fitting, in accordance with the Accomplishment the availability of this material at the NARA, 2005–13–31 Short Brothers PLC: Instructions of the service bulletin. call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// Amendment 39–14168. Docket 2003– (c) If no corrosion is found during the www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_ NM–127–AD. inspection required by paragraph (a) or if the federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Applicability: All Model SD3–60 airplanes, fitting was replaced with a new fitting in Effective Date certificated in any category. accordance with Short Brothers Service Compliance: Required as indicated, unless Bulletin SD360–53–45, dated December (h) This amendment becomes effective on accomplished previously. 2003, do the actions in paragraphs (c)(1) and August 2, 2005. To detect and correct corrosion in the area (c)(2) of this AD. Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14, of the main spar web fittings of the vertical (1) Within 24 months after the initial 2005. stabilizer, which could result in reduced inspection required by paragraph (a) of this Kevin M. Mullin, structural integrity of the vertical stabilizer, AD or within 24 months after replacement of Acting Manager, Transport Airplane accomplish the following: the fitting with a new one, whichever occurs later, do a borescope (intrascope) detailed Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Inspection and Previous Actions inspection for corrosion, in accordance with [FR Doc. 05–12508 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am] (a) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(1) Part A of the Accomplishment Instructions of BILLING CODE 4910–13–P and (a)(2) of this AD, within 4,800 flight Short Brothers Service Bulletin SD360–53– hours or 90 days after the effective date of 45, dated December 2003. Repeat this this AD, whichever occurs first, do a inspection thereafter at intervals not to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION borescope inspection to detect corrosion of exceed 24 months. Do corrective actions in the shear attachment fittings of the vertical accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. Federal Aviation Administration stabilizer, in accordance with the (2) Thereafter, except as provided in Accomplishment Instructions of Short paragraph (f) of this AD, no alternative 14 CFR Part 39 Brothers Service Bulletin SD360–53–45, borescope inspections may be approved. [Docket No. FAA–2004–18716; Directorate dated December 2003. Previous Repetitive Inspections (1) If an airplane (the shear attachment Identifier 2003–NM–240–AD; Amendment fitting) has been inspected in accordance (d) Borescope (intrascope) detailed 39–14156; AD 2005–13–19] with the Accomplishment Instructions of inspections done before the effective date of RIN 2120–AA64 Short Brothers Service Bulletin SD360–53– this AD in accordance with Bombardier Temporary Revisions (TR) TR360–MPSUPP– 44, Revision 1, dated January 24, 2003, before Airworthiness Directives; BAE the effective date of this AD, and was found 04 and TR360–MPSUPP–03, both dated to have no corrosion on the fittings, then the August 20, 2003, are acceptable for Systems (Operations) Limited Model initial inspection specified in paragraph (a) compliance with the requirements of BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ Series of this AD is not required. paragraph (c)(1) of this AD. Airplanes (2) If the shear attachment fitting has been Disposition of Repairs for Corroded/ AGENCY: Federal Aviation inspected in accordance with the Oversized Holes Accomplishment Instructions of Short Administration (FAA), Department of Brothers Service Bulletin SD360–53–44, (e) Where Short Brothers Service Bulletin Transportation (DOT). Revision 1, dated January 24, 2003, and was SD360–53–45, dated December 2003, says to ACTION: Final rule. found to have corrosion, but the corroded contact the manufacturer for action on any fitting is not yet replaced, then a review of corroded or oversized hole found during the SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new the inspection results is required to inspection required by paragraph (a) or (c) of airworthiness directive (AD) for all BAE determine if the corrosion was within the this AD, before further flight, repair in Systems (Operations) Limited Model acceptable limits specified in Short Brothers accordance with a method approved by BAe 146 and Avro 146–RJ series either the Manager, International Branch, Service Bulletin SD360–53–45, dated airplanes. This AD requires repetitive December 2003. ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the Civil Aviation Authority external eddy current inspections of the Corrective Actions and Repetitive (or its delegated agent). forward fuselage skin to detect cracking Inspections due to fatigue, and repair if necessary. Alternative Methods of Compliance (b) If any corrosion is found during the This AD is prompted by evidence of inspection required by paragraph (a) of this (f) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the cracking due to fatigue along the edges AD, do the applicable actions required by Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, is of the chemi-etched pockets in certain paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD. authorized to approve alternative methods of front fuselage canopy skin panels. We compliance for this AD. (1) If any corrosion is within the limits are issuing this AD to detect and correct specified in the Accomplishment Note 1: The subject of this AD is addressed this cracking, which could result in in British airworthiness directive G–2004– Instructions of Short Brothers Service reduced structural integrity of the Bulletin SD360–53–45, dated December 0005, effective March 16, 2004. 2003, do the actions required by paragraphs airplane fuselage. (b)(1)(i) and (b)(1)(ii) of this AD. Incorporation by Reference DATES: This AD becomes effective (i) Repeat the inspection required by the (g) You must use Short Brothers Service August 2, 2005. service bulletin at intervals not to exceed 6 Bulletin SD360–53–45, dated December The incorporation by reference of a months. 2003, to perform the actions that are required certain publication listed in the AD is (ii) Within 18 months after the initial by this AD, unless the AD specifies approved by the Director of the Federal inspection required by paragraph (a) of this otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register as of August 2, 2005. AD, replace all corroded shear attachment Register approves the incorporation by ADDRESSES: fittings in accordance with the reference of this document in accordance For service information Accomplishment Instructions of the service with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To identified in this AD, contact British bulletin. Accomplishing the replacement get copies of the service information, contact Aerospace Regional Aircraft American ends the repetitive inspections required by Short Brothers, Airworthiness & Engineering Support, 13850 Mclearen Road, paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this AD. Quality, P.O. Box 241, Airport Road, Belfast Herndon, Virginia 20171. VerDate jul<14>2003 15:51 Jun 27, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM 28JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 37023 Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD refers to BAE Systems normal maintenance schedules. The proposed AD, comments, and any final (Operations) Limited Inspection Service commenter provides no justification for disposition. You can examine the AD Bulletin ISB.53–167, including the requested change other than for the docket on the Internet at http:// Appendices 2 and 3, all dated June 27, convenience of its maintenance dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket 2003, as the applicable source of service program. Management Facility office between 9 information for the actions specified in We do not concur. In developing a a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through that paragraph. repetitive interval for this AD, we Friday, except Federal holidays. The We concur. We have reviewed BAE considered the manufacturer’s Docket Management Facility office Systems (Operations) Limited recommendation and the action taken (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–167, by the CAA, as well as the degree of the plaza level of the Nassif Building at including Appendix 2, Revision 1. The urgency associated with the subject the U.S. Department of Transportation, instructions in Revision 1 are essentially unsafe condition. In light of these 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401, the same as those in the original issue factors, we find that a 4,000-flight-cycle Washington, DC. This docket number is of the service bulletin, including repetitive interval represents an FAA–2004–18716; the directorate Appendices 2 and 3. Accordingly, we appropriate interval of time for Model identifier for this docket is 2003–NM– have revised this AD to refer to BAE Avro 146-RJ series airplanes to operate 240–AD. Systems (Operations) Limited between inspections without FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inspection Service Bulletin ISB.53–167, compromising safety. We note that this Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer; including Appendix 2, Revision 1, as is consistent with the repetitive interval International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, the applicable source of service specified in the referenced service Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 information for the actions required by bulletin. However, under the provisions Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington paragraph (f) of this AD.
Recommended publications
  • Cross & Cockade International SERIALS with PHOTOGRAPHS
    Cross & Cockade International THE FIRST WORLD WAR AVIATION HISTORICAL SOCIETY Registered Charity No 1117741 www.crossandcockade.com INDEX for SERIALS with PHOTOGRAPHS This is a provisional index of all the photographs of aircraft with serial numbers in the 46 years of the Cross & Cockade Journal. There are only photographs with identifiable serials, no other items are indexed. Following the Aircraft serial number is the make & model in parentheses, then page number format is: first the volume number, followed by the issue number (1 to 4) between periods with the page number(s) at the end. The cover pages use the last three characters with a 'c' (cover) 'f' - 'r'(front-rear), '1'(outside) '2' (inside). There are over 4180 entries in three categories, British individual aircraft, other countries individual aircraft, followed by airships & balloons. Regretfully, copies of the photographs are not available. Derek Riley, Jan. 22, 2017 AIRCRAFT SERIAL, BRITISH INDIVIDUAL...............................pg 01 AIRCRAFT SERIALS, OTHER COUNTRY...................................pg 13 AIRSHIPS & BALLOONS.............................................................pg 18 AIRCRAFT SERIAL, British individual 81 (Short Folder Seaplane) 07.1.024, 184 (Short Admiralty Type 184) 04.1.cr2, Serial Aircraft type Page num 07.1.027, 15.4.162 06.4.152, 06.4.cf1, 15.4.166, 16.2.064 2 (Short Biplane) 15.4.148 88 (Borel Seaplane) 15.4.167, 16.2.056 187 (Wight Twin Seaplane) 16.2.065 9 (Etrich Taube Monoplane) 15.4.149, 95 (M.Farman Seaplane) 03.4.139, 16.2.057 201 (RAF BE1) 08.4.150, 36.4.256, 42.3.149 46.4.266 97 (H.Farman Biplane) 16.2.057 202 (Bréguet L.2 biplane) 08.4.149 10 (Short Improved S41 Type) 23.4.171, 98 (H.Farman Biplane) 15.4.157 203 (RAF BE3) 08.4.152, 09.4.172, 20.3.134, 34.1.065 103 (Sopwith Tractor Biplane) 15.4.157, 20.3.135, 23.4.169, 28.4.182, 38.4.239, 14 (Bristol Coanda monoplane) 45.3.176 15.4.165 38.4.242, 41.3.162 16 (Avro 503) 15.4.150 104 (Sopwith Tractor Biplane) 03.4.143 204 (RAF BE4) 20.3.134, 23.4.176, 36.1.058 17 (Hydro Recon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society
    A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY Royal Aeronautical Society Council Dinner at the Science Museum on 26 May 1932 with Guest of Honour Miss Amelia Earhart. Edited by Chris Male MRAeS Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com Afterburner Society News RAeS 150th ANNIVERSARY www.aerosociety.com/150 The Royal Aeronautical Society: Part 1 – The early years The Beginning “At a meeting held at Argyll Lodge, Campden Hill, Right: The first Aeronautical on 12 January 1866, His Grace The Duke of Argyll Exhibition, Crystal Palace, 1868, showing the presiding; also present Mr James Glaisher, Dr Hugh Stringfellow Triplane model W. Diamond, Mr F.H. Wenham, Mr James Wm. Butler and other exhibits. No fewer and Mr F.W. Brearey. Mr Glaisher read the following than 77 exhibits were address: collected together, including ‘The first application of the Balloon as a means of engines, lighter- and heavier- than-air models, kites and ascending into the upper regions of the plans of projected machines. atmosphere has been almost within the recollection A special Juror’s Report on on ‘Aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy of men now living but with the exception of some the exhibits was issued. bodies impelled through air are sustained’. of the early experimenters it has scarcely occupied Below: Frederick W Brearey, Wenham’s lecture is now one of the aeronautical Secretary of the the attention of scientific men, nor has the subject of Aeronautical Society of Great classics and was the beginning of the pattern of aeronautics been properly recognised as a distinct Britain, 1866-1896.
    [Show full text]
  • Airwork Limited
    AN APPRECIATION The Council of the Royal Aeronautical Society wish to thank those Companies who, by their generous co-operation, have done so much to help in the production of the Journal ACCLES & POLLOCK LIMITED AIRWORK LIMITED _5£ f» g AIRWORK LIMITED AEROPLANE & MOTOR ALUMINIUM ALVIS LIMITED CASTINGS LTD. ALUMINIUM CASTINGS ^-^rr AIRCRAFT MATERIALS LIMITED ARMSTRONG SIDDELEY MOTORS LTD. STRUCTURAL MATERIALS ARMSTRONG SIDDELEY and COMPONENTS AIRSPEED LIMITED SIR W. G. ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH AIRCRAFT LTD. SIR W. G. ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH AIRCRAFT LIMITED AUSTER AIRCRAFT LIMITED BLACKBURN AIRCRAFT LTD. ^%N AUSTER Blackburn I AIRCRAFT I AUTOMOTIVE PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD. JAMES BOOTH & COMPANY LTD. (H1GH PRECISION! HYDRAULICS a;) I DURALUMIN LJOC kneed *(6>S'f*ir> tttaot • AVIMO LIMITED BOULTON PAUL AIRCRAFT L"TD. OPTICAL - MECHANICAL - ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENTS AERONAUTICAL EQUIPMENT BAKELITE LIMITED BRAKE LININGS LIMITED BAKELITE d> PLASTICS KEGD. TEAM MARKS ilMilNIICI1TIIH I BRAKE AND CLUTCH LININGS T. M. BIRKETT & SONS LTD. THE BRISTOL AEROPLANE CO., LTD. NON-FERROUS CASTINGS AND MACHINED PARTS HANLEY - - STAFFS THE BRITISH ALUMINIUM CO., LTD. BRITISH WIRE PRODUCTS LTD. THE BRITISH AVIATION INSURANCE CO. LTD. BROOM & WADE LTD. iy:i:M.mnr*jy BRITISH AVIATION SERVICES LTD. BRITISH INSULATED CALLENDER'S CABLES LTD. BROWN BROTHERS (AIRCRAFT) LTD. SMS^MMM BRITISH OVERSEAS AIRWAYS CORPORATION BUTLERS LIMITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND MARITIME LAMPS BOM SEARCHLICHTS AND MOTOR ACCESSORIES BRITISH THOMSON-HOUSTON CO., THE CHLORIDE ELECTRICAL STORAGE CO. LTD. LIMITED (THE) Hxtie AIRCRAFT BATTERIES! Magnetos and Electrical Equipment COOPER & CO. (B'HAM) LTD. DUNFORD & ELLIOTT (SHEFFIELD) LTD. COOPERS I IDBSHU l Bala i IIIIKTI A. C. COSSOR LIMITED DUNLOP RUBBER CO., LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford
    List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
    [Show full text]
  • CAA - Airworthiness Approved Organisations
    CAA - Airworthiness Approved Organisations Category BCAR Name British Balloon and Airship Club Limited (DAI/8298/74) (GA) Address Cushy DingleWatery LaneLlanishen Reference Number DAI/8298/74 Category BCAR Chepstow Website www.bbac.org Regional Office NP16 6QT Approval Date 26 FEBRUARY 2001 Organisational Data Exposition AW\Exposition\BCAR A8-15 BBAC-TC-134 ISSUE 02 REVISION 00 02 NOVEMBER 2017 Name Lindstrand Technologies Ltd (AD/1935/05) Address Factory 2Maesbury Road Reference Number AD/1935/05 Category BCAR Oswestry Website Shropshire Regional Office SY10 8GA Approval Date Organisational Data Category BCAR A5-1 Name Deltair Aerospace Limited (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address 17 Aston Road, Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Waterlooville Website http://www.deltair- aerospace.co.uk/contact Hampshire Regional Office PO7 7XG United Kingdom Approval Date Organisational Data 30 July 2021 Page 1 of 82 Name Acro Aeronautical Services (TRA)(GA) (A5-1) Address Rossmore38 Manor Park Avenue Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Princes Risborough Website Buckinghamshire Regional Office HP27 9AS Approval Date Organisational Data Name British Gliding Association (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address 8 Merus Court,Meridian Business Reference Number Park Category BCAR A5-1 Leicester Website Leicestershire Regional Office LE19 1RJ Approval Date Organisational Data Name Shipping and Airlines (TRA) (GA) (A5-1) Address Hangar 513,Biggin Hill Airport, Reference Number Category BCAR A5-1 Westerham Website Kent Regional Office TN16 3BN Approval Date Organisational Data Name
    [Show full text]
  • GKN Aerospace Engine Products West PURCHASING QUALITY NOTES
    GKN Aerospace Engine Products West REVISION DATE: PURCHASING QUALITY NOTES 11/06/19 NOTE NUMBER NOTE TEXT 0000000001 Documented approval scopes issued by GKN Aerospace Inc., Quality Assurance department shall be adhered 11/06/2019 to at all times. When issued, the supplier shall maintain these documents for reference when servicing GKN purchase orders or providing tender in response to requests for quote. Supplier shall notify GKN of any changes in product and/or process, changes in suppliers, changes of manufacturing facility location and, where required, obtain GKN approval of changes prior to incorporation. Supplier's facilities, contracted products, procedures and records shall be made available to GKN to verify compliance to purchase order requirements. A representative, familiar with the supplier's operations and systems, shall be provided to assist GKN in conducting surveillance activities. Access shall also be extended to GKN customers and/or regulatory agencies as applicable. Supplier shall maintain an effective Quality System in accordance with the following GKN Supplier Quality Standard depending on GKN location P.O. is issued from: Santa Ana (Astech) P.O.s - CTQS 9002 - Located at the following website: https://www.gkn.com/en/Utilities/gkn-aerospace-suppliers/gkn-in-americas/santa-ana/ El Cajon and Mexicali P.O.s – SQAR 211 and associated appendix based on End Item Customer noted on P.O. (i.e. PWA, G.E., Rolls Royce, Etc.) Note: If GKN PO identifies part or material as GKN Sweden Design, SQAR 210 will apply in place of SQAR 211. This will be noted on the PO flow down if it applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Aerospace (PDF)
    Northern Ireland Aerospace A Front cover image courtesy of Spirit AeroSystems Belfast - A220 Wing - designed, developed, manufactured and assembled in Northern Ireland. B Northern Ireland Aerospace B 1 Contents Northern Ireland Aerospace 4 Creative Composites Ltd 23 Goudsmit UK Ltd 43 Northern Ireland Location and Key Facts 6 Crossen Engineering Ltd 24 Green Energy Engineering Ltd 44 Cunningham Covers Ltd 25 Hex Horus Ltd 45 Company Profiles Cuthbertson Laird Ltd 26 IconicRF Ltd 46 ADS Group Ltd 7 Datum Tool Design Ltd 27 IPC Mouldings Ltd 47 Aerospace Metal Finishers Ltd 8 Denroy Plastics 28 jheSOLUTIONS Ltd 48 All Metal Services Ltd 9 Derry Precision Tools 29 John Rainey & Son Ltd 49 Axis Composites 10 DHL Global Forwarding (UK) Ltd 30 Juno Composites Ltd 50 Belfast Aircraft Stress Engineers Ltd 11 Donite Plastics Ltd 31 Kuehne + Nagel Ltd 51 Belfast Metropolitan College 12 Dontaur Engineering Ltd 32 Kx 52 Blue Eagle Precision Ltd 13 Doran Precision Engineering 33 Laser Prototypes (Europe) Ltd 53 Boyce Precision Engineering Ltd 14 Eirtech Aviation Composites Ltd 34 Magellan Aerospace (Greyabbey) Ltd 54 Bradfor Ltd 15 Electronic Automation Engineers Ltd 35 Marlborough Engineering Ltd 55 Causeway Aero Group Ltd 16 ECIT 36 McGreevy Engineering Ltd 56 CCP Gransden Ltd 17 Elite Electronic Systems Ltd 37 McKenzies (NI) Ltd 57 Centre for Competitiveness 18 Euro-Composites® S.A. 38 MF Logistics Ltd 58 Clinty Regen Ltd 19 Exact CNC 39 Mo Team Ltd 59 CM Precision Components Ltd 20 Fleet Maintenance Ireland Ltd 40 Morson Projects Ltd 60 Collins
    [Show full text]
  • The Connection
    The Connection ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2011: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2011 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 978-0-,010120-2-1 Printed by 3indrush 4roup 3indrush House Avenue Two Station 5ane 3itney O72. 273 1 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 8arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 8ichael Beetham 4CB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air 8arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-8arshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman 4roup Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary 4roup Captain K J Dearman 8embership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol A8RAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA 8embers Air Commodore 4 R Pitchfork 8BE BA FRAes 3ing Commander C Cummings *J S Cox Esq BA 8A *AV8 P Dye OBE BSc(Eng) CEng AC4I 8RAeS *4roup Captain A J Byford 8A 8A RAF *3ing Commander C Hunter 88DS RAF Editor A Publications 3ing Commander C 4 Jefford 8BE BA 8anager *Ex Officio 2 CONTENTS THE BE4INNIN4 B THE 3HITE FA8I5C by Sir 4eorge 10 3hite BEFORE AND DURIN4 THE FIRST 3OR5D 3AR by Prof 1D Duncan 4reenman THE BRISTO5 F5CIN4 SCHOO5S by Bill 8organ 2, BRISTO5ES
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT Spiritaero.Com SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS ANNUAL REPORT and 1O-K
    ANNUAL REPORT spiritaero.com SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS ANNUAL REPORT AND 1O-K 2020 Spirit AeroSystems 2 LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS 2020 was a transformational year for Spirit supply to our customers, including critical national AeroSystems as we dealt with unparalleled challenges security programs. To address the health and safety to our business, and to the aviation industry as a concerns for our workforce, Spirit put in place whole, with dual crises resulting from the grounding protocols across our global operations to help of the 737 MAX and the sudden drop in air travel due protect our team. These measures included requiring to the global pandemic. In short, it was a year unlike the use of masks; installation of thermal scanners; any other in the Company’s history. As we navigated testing; air purification; and procedures for the dual crises impacting Spirit, we focused on driving symptomatic employees or those who tested action in five key areas – protecting our team; positive. These measures allowed us to continue adjusting costs to lower production levels; operating and meeting our commitments, while strengthening our liquidity; enhancing the taking steps to keep our employees safe. productivity and efficiency of our operations; and diversifying our business. I am proud to share with Adjusting Costs to Lower Levels of Production you what the Spirit team accomplished. 2020 began with production on the MAX program suspended by our customer. Ultimately, after several Protecting Our Team rate changes, we would build just 71 MAX ship sets – As a manufacturing company, the spread of an 88 percent reduction compared to 2019 COVID-19 presented a significant challenge for the deliveries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines
    The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines Product Code #F640 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Aviation Gas Turbine Forecast Analysis 1 The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Market Focus .............................................................................................................................................................3 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................4 Figure 1 - The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines Unit Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph) .................................................................................6 Figure 2 - The Market for Aviation Turbofan Engines Value of Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph)...........................................................................6 Manufacturers Review.............................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Terminologies
    FISH TERMINOLOGIES First World War Thesaurus Report Format: Hierarchical listing - class Notes: For the recording of monuments related to the First World War in the UK. Date: February 2020 AGRICULTURE AND SUBSISTENCE CLASS LIST ALLOTMENT FARM PIGGERY REQUISITIONED LAND 2 AIRCRAFT TYPE CLASS LIST AIRCRAFT <BY FORM> AIRSHIP ZEPPELIN BIPLANE AIRCO DH1 AIRCO DH2 AIRCO DH4 AIRCO DH5 AIRCO DH6 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK3 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK8 AVRO 504 BLERIOT 155 BRISTOL F2B CAMEL GOTHA GV SNIPE V1500 VIMY GLIDER LIGHT AIRCRAFT MONOPLANE FOKKER SEAPLANE FLOATPLANE FLYING BOAT TRIPLANE AIRCRAFT <BY FUNCTION> BOMBER AIRCO DH4 AIRCO DH9 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK8 FIGHTER BOMBER DIVE BOMBER HEAVY BOMBER GOTHA GV V1500 VIMY LIGHT BOMBER MEDIUM BOMBER TORPEDO BOMBER COMMUNICATIONS FIGHTER AIRCO DH1 AIRCO DH2 AIRCO DH5 BRISTOL F2B CAMEL FIGHTER BOMBER DIVE BOMBER NIGHTFIGHTER SNIPE MINELAYER RECONNAISSANCE 3 AIRCRAFT TYPE CLASS LIST AIRCO DH6 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK3 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK8 BRISTOL F2B PHOTO RECONNAISSANCE TARGET TARGET TUG TEST AIRCRAFT TRAINER ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK3 TRANSPORTER BLERIOT 155 FOKKER TUG GLIDER TUG AIRCRAFT <BY MANUFACTURER> AIRCO AIRCO DH1 AIRCO DH2 AIRCO DH4 AIRCO DH5 AIRCO DH6 AIRCO DH9 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK3 ARMSTRONG WHITWORTH FK8 AVRO AVRO 504 BLACKBURN BLERIOT BLERIOT 155 BRISTOL BRISTOL F2B DE HAVILLAND FELIXSTOWE FOKKER GENERAL AIRCRAFT GOTHA GOTHA GV HANDLY PAGE V1500 NIEUPORT SOPWITH CAMEL SNIPE VICKERS ARMSTRONGS VICKERS VIMY AIRCRAFT MARK MKI MKIC MKIF 4 AIRCRAFT TYPE CLASS LIST MKII MKIIA
    [Show full text]
  • Jammed Elevator Prompts Twin-Turboprop Rejected Takeoff, Runway Over-Run
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 56 No. 4 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight April 1999 Jammed Elevator Prompts Twin-turboprop Rejected Takeoff, Runway Over-run The investigating authority said that deficiencies in the Hawker Siddeley 748 flight control gust-lock system might have caused the elevator gust lock to re-engage when the flight crew checked the flight controls at the beginning of the takeoff. FSF Editorial Staff On Aug. 16, 1996, the flight crew of an Emerald • “Inadequacies in maintenance information and Airways Hawker Siddeley (HS) 748 Series 2A implementation that led to failure to correctly rejected a takeoff at Liverpool (England) Airport maintain a gust-lock system, the design of which when takeoff rotation was prevented by a jammed is inherently sensitive to deficiencies; [and,] elevator. The airplane was substantially damaged when it struck an instrument landing system (ILS) • “Lack of fully effective modification action, power-supply building off the end of the runway. The following the fatal over-run accident to HS 748, flight crew, alone aboard the airplane, was not G-BEKF, at Sumburgh [Shetland Islands, injured. Scotland] Airport on 31 July 1979 (AIB [U.K. Accidents Investigation Branch1] Report 1/81), The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch to address the inherent design sensitivity of the (AAIB) said, in its final report, that the causes of the flight controls gust-lock system.” accident were: The Sumburgh accident occurred when the airplane, operated • “Flight control gust-lock system deficiencies, which by Dan-Air Services, exited the end of the runway and entered probably caused the elevator lock to re-engage on the North Sea while taking off for a charter flight to Aberdeen, completion of the crew’s full-and-free check of the flight Scotland.
    [Show full text]