DOCSLIB.ORG

PROFINET Vs. Ethernet/IP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROFINET Vs. Ethernet/IP PROFINET vs. EtherNet/IP Presentation downloadable from www.us.profinet.com/PxC Carl Henning PI North America Discussion, not lecture 2 www.us.profinet.com Agenda 3 The Organization Global support Breadth of Application Coverage Factory (discrete), process, and motion Depth of features Determinism, diagnostics, PROFIenergy, PROFIsafe, I-Device, Shared Device, wireless, etc. Leadership Pioneered safety and many other Industrial Ethernet aspects Resources www.us.profinet.com The Organization: PROFINET 4 Belgium France Netherlands Canada Sweden RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC PITC, PITL Czech Rep. Germany & Austria Norway Slovakia Switzerland RPA, PICC, RPA, PICC RPA, PICC, PITC RPA RPA, PICC, PITC PITC, PITL PITC, PITL Denmark Ireland Poland Spain UK RPA RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC, RPA, PICC, PITC PITC Finland Italy China RPA RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC, PITL India RPA, PICC Japan RPA, PICC, PITL Brazil Korea RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC Chile Middle-East / UAE RPA, PICC, PITC RPA, PICC USA South-East-Asia Lebanon RPA, PICC, RPA PICC PITC, PITL Southern Africa Australia/ Saudi Arabia RPA, PICC, PITC New Zealand PICC, PITC RPA, PICC, PITC PI worldwide: PI Technical Support: 53 PI Competence Centers (PICC) 27 Regional PI Associations (RPA) 28 PI Training Centers (PITC) 1,487 Members Certified 10 PI Test Laboratories (PITL) www.us.profinet.com4 The Organizations 5 PI ODVA Regional Associations 27 4 Members 1,487 300 Training centers 28 1 Test labs 10 4 Competence Centers 53 0 Broad international support matters if You ship products globally You ship machines globally You build plants globally PI certification of PICCs, PITCs, & PITLs Quality of Service agreements with PI Audited by PI www.us.profinet.com The Organizations: Activities 6 PI ODVA Newsletter subscribers 130,000 no Member Newsletter yes no Twitter accounts 3 0 YouTube channels 3 0 Facebook pages 3+ 0 LinkedIn groups 3 0 Webinars yes no Blog yes no Training Classes* 16 0 Certified Training Classes* 8 0 Certified Engineers* 1,000 0 *US Only www.us.profinet.com The Organizations: Cooperation 7 PI Works with NAMUR for process Works with AIDA for automotive Started Wireless Cooperation with FF and HART Launched FDI (Field Device Integration) with FF, HART, OPC, FDT Incubated IO-Link Absorbed Interbus ODVA Some relationships with SERCOS and Modbus www.us.profinet.com PI markets 8 Process Oil and gas Water/wastewater Pharma Factory Automotive Logistics Other discrete manufacturing www.us.profinet.com Industry 4.0, IoT, IIoT, … 9 www.us.profinet.com It’s all about the data 10 IoT IIoT Industrial Internet Industry 4.0 more www.us.profinet.com The road to IIoT 11 Evolution NOT Revolution PROFIBUS DP PROFIBUS PA www.us.profinet.com Breadth of Application Coverage 12 Factory – both Process – both, but… Non-intrinsically safe instruments, EIP has more Intrinsically safe, both rely on PROFIBUS PA (or Foundation Fieldbus) PROFINET uses proxies to integrate others Motion PI has had PROFIdrive for decades First for PROFIBUS, then PROFINET ODVA has CIPmotion and SERCOS III www.us.profinet.com Competitive comparison: discrete IO 13 Technology PROFINET EtherNet/IP Modbus TCP Provider- Provider- Client- Communication Model Consumer Consumer Server IEEE 802.3 Real-time Protocol (Layer 2) primary, UDP/IP (Layer 4) TCP/IP (Layer 4) Options UDP/IP option, TCP/IP option Jitter with IO ++ (low) - (high) -- (higher) Protocol Standard IEC 61158 IEC 61158 IEC 61158 Unicast primary, Multicast primary, Transmission Type Unicast only Multicast optional Limited Unicast Device Names Mandatory Optional Optional COTS switch possible? Yes Not recommended Yes Full Duplex 100Mbit/s or faster, IGMP Snooping, One No special Switch requirements full duplex for IO IGMP Query, requirements traffic Wire speed For IO traffic Automatic w/ PN DHCP and DHCP and IP Address Assignment DCP Managed Managed DHCP optional www.us.profinet.com PROFINET in Process 14 Engineering Station / OS Diagnosis & Commissioning DCS/ AS PROFINET PROFIBUS DP RS 485iS Drives max. 1.5Mbit/s in Ex Positioners PN/PA link Motor starter ET 200iSP FF PROFIBUS PA 31.25kbit/s Classic I/O Positioners Temperature & HART Level Flow Pressure Transparent access to diagnostic and commissioning data www.us.profinet.com Competitive comparison: process 15 Technology PROFINET EtherNet/IP Modbus TCP Yes Media (Network) Yes Yes SP, RSP, PN MRP, Redundancy SP, RSP, DLR, vendor SP, RSP, vendor bumpless IRT, specific specific vendor specific Bumpless Redundancy Yes No No Not on EtherNet/IP, Controller Redundancy Yes Only with additional ODVA No networks and hardware Device Redundancy Yes No No PROFINET for PA Yes No No (Process Automation) Many, including non PI networks CompoNet, DeviceNet, Fieldbus Integration (PROFIBUS, Interbus, ControlNet, Modbus ASI, DeviceNet, Modbus TCP Foundation Fieldbus, Modbus, Hart, etc.) www.us.profinet.com Motion Control Topology 16 Office / IT Network PC PLC IO RT communication Printer HMI RT communication RT communication Switch IRT IRT communication communication IRT communication Motion Controller RT communication RT communication RT communication Standard Ethernet devices can be connected at any point in the network No closed real-time domain www.us.profinet.com Competitive comparison: motion 17 Motion control comparison: Modbus TCP is left out of this table as they do not support motion control. Technology PROFINET EtherNet/IP Open System Open System Architecture (simultaneous TCP) (simultaneous TCP) IEEE 802.3 Yes Yes compliant Yes, Transparent clock No, Deterministic < 1μs jitter Boundary clocks calculated jitter Accumulating jitter Synchronized Yes Yes Peer-to-Peer Yes, TCP/IP traffic Yes with caution 150 Axes/1ms Throughput 30 Axes/1ms 35 Axes/250μs IEEE 1588 IEEE 1588v2 IEEE 1588 Special switches Built into PROFINET chips needed Automatic Timing Yes No Calculation www.us.profinet.com Depth of Features 18 Speed, determinism Diagnostics Vertical PROFIenergy PROFIsafe I-Device Shared Device Wireless More Security (common problem and solution) www.us.profinet.com 5 steps to determinism 19 Switch Port1 Port2 Port4 Port1 Controller Port1 Port2 Port1 Port1 Fast Forwarding 31.25µsec DFP Fragmentation Motion Control DeviceScheduling x Device y Device z (IRT) IRT Bandwidth Standard channel High Speed IO Reservation channel (IRT) Cycle 1 Real-time Layer 2 (RT) HTTP PROFINET SNMP … Standard 1 2 data 3 time time - TCP/UDP - Isochr. Real Real Configuration TCP/IP TCP/IP IP RT/RT IRT IRT = Isochronous Real-time DFP = Dynamic Frame Packing Ethernet www.us.profinet.com PROFINET and TCP/IP 20 PROFINET DOES NOT USE STANDARD TCP/IP PROFINET uses TCP/IP where it makes sense: Diagnostics Non time critical data Communicating with higher level IT systems PROFINET real-time coexists with TCP/IP without restrictions 31.25µsec Scheduling Bandwidth Real-Time TCP/IP Why not use TCP/IP for real-time? 21 Because it’s not fast enough and it’s not deterministic enough. Here’s why: ∆T1 ∆T5 Server Client Data ∆T2 TCP/IP TCP/IP ∆T4 Suite Suite ∆T3 Ethernet Ethernet UNWELCOME DELAYS 31.25µsec Scheduling Bandwidth Real-Time TCP/IP Ethernet doesn’t cause delays 22 100m 100m Switched 100Mbps 64-byte Ethernet packet Propagation Node A Node B 0.5 Transmission 5.12 Node time Switch latency Network 330 10 Transmission 5.12 Propagation 0.5 All times in µs Source: University of Michigan, Industrial Ethernet Book, 31.25µsec “Performance Metrics for Industrial Ethernet” Scheduling Bandwidth Real-Time TCP/IP PROFINET RT (Real Time) 23 The device determines which path the telegram takes Ethernet Frame InterFrame Pre- Sync MAC MAC EtherVLAN- Ether- Frame Data Cycle Data- Trans FCS Gap amble type type ID Counter Status Status 12 Byte 7 Byte 1 Byte 6 Byte 6 Byte 2 Byte2 Byte 2 Byte 2 Byte 40*…1440 Bytes 2 Byte 1 Byte 1 Byte 4 Byte RT Data Ethertype (type of protocol): Ethertype (PN): 0x8892 Ethertype (IP): 0x0800 EtherType (ARP): 0x0806 EtherType (IPV6): 0x86DD … HTTP SNMP Socket PROFINET TCP / UDP time - IEEE EtherType IEEE EtherType 0x0800 IP Real 0x8892 31.25µsec Ethernet InterFrame Pre- S yn c M AC M AC Ether- VLAN Ether- Frame Data C ycl e Data- Trans FCS Scheduling Gap ambel t yp e t yp e ID Counter Status Status 12 Byte 7 B yt e 1 B yt e 6 B yt e 6 B yt e 2 B yt e 2 B yt e 2 B yt e 2 B yt e 40*…1440 Bytes 2 B yt e 1 B yt e 1 B yt e 4 B yt e Bandwidth Real-Time TCP/IP www.us.profinet.com When you try to use all layers… 24 Industriale.g. Industrial Application WEB SNMP Socket Application WEB SNMP Socket PROFINET Layer EtherNet/IPProtocols Layer Protocols Transport Layer TCP / UDP Transport Layer TCP / UDP Internet Layer IP Internet Layer IP Network Access Network Access Layer Ethernet IEEE 802.3 Layer Ethernet IEEE 802.3 31.25µsec Scheduling Bandwidth Real-Time PROFINET is the enabling factor to achieve www.us.profinet.com TCP/IP speed and determinism When you try to use all layers… 25 Industriale.g. Industrial Application WEB SNMP Socket Application WEB SNMP Socket PROFINET Layer EtherNet/IPProtocols Layer Protocols Transport Layer TCP / UDP Transport Layer TCP / UDP Internet Layer IP Internet Layer IP Network Access Network Access Layer Ethernet IEEE 802.3 Layer Ethernet IEEE 802.3 16 ms Less than 100µs 8 ms Jitter Source: University of Michigan, Industrial Ethernet Book, 31.25µsec “Performance Metrics for Industrial Ethernet” Scheduling Bandwidth Real-Time PROFINET is the enabling factor to achieve www.us.profinet.com TCP/IP speed and determinism Bandwidth Reservation for PROFINET IRT 26 IRT = Isochronous Real Time Communication system scheduling Exact cycle synchronization Separate time domains for Real-time and non-Real-time IRT IRT IRT Standard channel Standard channel channel channel channel Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle n e.g.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Ttethernet for Integrated Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Networks
    On TTEthernet for Integrated Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Networks Andrew Loveless∗ NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 77058 There has recently been a push for adopting integrated modular avionics (IMA) princi- ples in designing spacecraft architectures. This consolidation of multiple vehicle functions to shared computing platforms can significantly reduce spacecraft cost, weight, and de- sign complexity. Ethernet technology is attractive for inclusion in more integrated avionic systems due to its high speed, flexibility, and the availability of inexpensive commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. Furthermore, Ethernet can be augmented with a variety of quality of service (QoS) enhancements that enable its use for transmitting critical data. TTEthernet introduces a decentralized clock synchronization paradigm enabling the use of time-triggered Ethernet messaging appropriate for hard real-time applications. TTEther- net can also provide two forms of event-driven communication, therefore accommodating the full spectrum of traffic criticality levels required in IMA architectures. This paper explores the application of TTEthernet technology to future IMA spacecraft architectures as part of the Avionics and Software (A&S) project chartered by NASA's Advanced Ex- ploration Systems (AES) program. Nomenclature A&S = Avionics and Software Project AA2 = Ascent Abort 2 AES = Advanced Exploration Systems Program ANTARES = Advanced NASA Technology Architecture for Exploration Studies API = Application Program Interface ARM = Asteroid Redirect Mission
    [Show full text]
  • PROFINET for Network Geeks
    PROFINET for Network Geeks (and those who want to be) Introduction PROFINET is an open Industrial Ethernet standard. It is a communication protocol that exchanges data between automation controllers and devices. With over 25 million installed nodes (as of 2018), PROFINET is one of the most widely used Industrial Ethernet standards worldwide. But even though millions of users are familiar with PROFINET, not all users understand how it works. This white paper starts with a brief overview of Ethernet and the 7-layer ISO-OSI model. Then, it describes how PROFINET’s 3 communication channels fit in the model: TCP/IP and UDP/IP, Real-Time (RT), and Isochronous Real-Time (IRT). 1 Ethernet The transition from using 4-20 mA analog signals for I/O communication to digital fieldbuses provided the benefits of reduced wiring, access to network data, and robust diagnostics. The later transition from digital fieldbuses to Ethernet was also similarly a shift to a more modern technology. Ethernet incorporated and improved upon the benefits of fieldbuses. Ethernet is ubiquitous and PROFINET uses standard Ethernet. Ethernet gives PROFINET the ability to provide faster updates, more bandwidth, larger messages, an unlimited address space, and even more diagnostic capabilities. Also, as commercial Ethernet evolves, PROFINET can take advantage of these physical layer improvements. Figure 1 ISO-OSI Model The ISO-OSI Model Ethernet-based communications can be represented by a seven-layer model: the ISO/OSI Reference Model. The model generically describes the means and methods used to transmit data. Each layer has a specific name and function, as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethercat – Ultra-Fast Communication Standard
    EtherCAT – ultra-fast communication standard In 2003, Beckhoff introduces its EtherCAT tech- In 2007, EtherCAT is adopted as an IEC standard, EtherCAT: nology into the market. The EtherCAT Technology underscoring how open the system is. To this Group (ETG) is formed, supported initially by day, the specification remains unchanged; it has global standard 33 founder members. The ETG goes on to stan- only been extended and compatibility has been dardize and maintain the technology. The group is retained. As a result, devices from the early years, the largest fieldbus user organization in the world, even from as far back as 2003, are still interopera- for real-time with more than 5000 members (as of 2019) cur- ble with today’s devices in the same networks. rently. In 2005, the Safety over EtherCAT protocol Another milestone is achieved in 2016 Ethernet from the is rolled out, expanding the EtherCAT specification with EtherCAT P, which introduces the ability to to enable safe transmission of safety-relevant carry power (2 x 24 V) on a standard Cat.5 cable field to the I/Os control data. The low-footprint protocol uses a alongside EtherCAT data. This paves the way for so-called Black Channel, making it completely machines without control cabinets. independent of the communication system used. The launch of EtherCAT G/G10 in 2018 in- How it works The key functional principle of EtherCAT lies in how its nodes process Ethernet frames: each node reads the data addressed to it and writes its data back to Flexible topology the frame all while the frame is An EtherCAT network can sup- moving downstream.
    [Show full text]
  • Configuring PROFINET
    CHAPTER9 Configuring PROFINET This chapter describes how to configure the PROFINET feature on the Cisco IE 3000 switch. • Understanding PROFINET, page 9-1 • Configuring PROFINET, page 9-4 • Displaying the PROFINET Configuration, page 9-5 • Troubleshooting PROFINET, page 9-5 Understanding PROFINET PROFINET is the PROFIBUS International (PI) open Industrial Ethernet Standard that uses TCP/IP and IT standards for automation control. PROFINET is particularly useful for industrial automation systems and process control networks, in which motion control and precision control of instrumentation and test equipment are important. It emphasizes data exchange and defines communication paths to meet speed requirements. PROFINET communication is scalable on three levels: • Normal non-real-time communication uses TCP/IP and enables bus cycle times of approximately 100 ms. • Real-time communication enables cycle times of approximately 10 ms. • Isochronous real-time communication enables cycle times of approximately 1 ms. Note The switch does not support isochronous real-time communication channels. PROFINET IO is a modular communication framework for distributed automation applications. PROFINET IO uses cyclic data transfer to exchange data, alarms, and diagnostic information with programmable controllers, input/output (I/O) devices, and other automation controllers (for example, motion controllers). PROFINET IO recognizes three classes of devices: • IO devices • IO controllers • IO supervisors Cisco IE 3000 Switch Software Configuration Guide OL-27302-02
    [Show full text]
  • Ethernet in the Automation Industry Part 3: Modbus TCP and PROFINET
    TECHNICAL ARTICLE | Share on Twitter | Share on LinkedIn | Email Ethernet in the Automation Industry Part 3: Modbus TCP and PROFINET In the first part of this series, we examined Ethernet’s numerous advan- of EtherNet/IP, Modbus TCP, and some forms of PROFINET all allow for this tages over fieldbuses within industrial automation and control. Ethernet level of interaction through CPwE. Ethernet, IP, and TCP/UDP can be used solutions offer superior bandwidth and lower equipment costs, as well at layers 2, 3, and 4, respectively, for communications between network as the ability to be extended across the entire plant as single networks devices running standard protocols. linking the factory floor with enterprise IT. With that third characteristic in mind, we also began, in the second part, to delve into converged Modbus TCP and PROFINET for Interoperable and plant-wide Ethernet (CPwE), the reference architecture jointly developed Interconnected Networks by Rockwell Automation and Cisco to encourage the modernization of IAC Let’s look at the two Ethernet-based solutions—Modbus TCP and a few 1 systems through the use of standard Ethernet in tandem with the IP suite. versions of PROFINET—that can interact with EtherNet/IP and other protocols (for example, HTTP, FTP, Telnet, etc.) without requiring the CPwE Overview and Wrap-Up implementation of nonstandard network interface cards and/or switch- CPwE is, at its heart, an attempt to help manufacturers move past the ing infrastructure. Both of these standards are popular, with PROFINET complexity of disparate legacy serial networks and achieve the service accounting for 8% of all industrial networks as of January 2015, and integration, straightforward maintenance, and high availability that they Modbus TCP holds 3% of the same market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of CAN in the Age of Ethernet and IOT
    iCC 2017 CAN in Automation The role of CAN in the age of Ethernet and IOT Christian Schlegel, HMS Industrial Networks CAN technology was developed in the 1980s and became available in 1987, just as other industrial fieldbus systems like PROFIBUS or INTERBUS entered the stage of industrial communication. Beside the fact that CAN is a success in the automotive industry and used in all types of cars today, it has also made its way in many other industrial areas. About 15 years ago, new technologies based on Ethernet started to emerge, with ap- pealing and sometimes outstanding features. Some six years ago Ethernet also started to find its way into automobiles. Today, other new communication technologies are showing up on the horizon driven by the omnipresent Industrial Internet of Things. But even now, 30 years after their introduction, these “classic” fieldbus technologies are still alive – with varying success. Since CAN was initially developed with a focus for use in automobiles, CAN has certain features that still make it the best choice for many applications in automobiles and industrial areas – even when compared to the newer technologies. This paper discusses why CAN is still a valid or even better choice for certain applica- tion areas than Ethernet-based technologies, not just focusing on the advanced fea- tures provided by the enhanced capabilities of CAN FD but also highlighting how these applications benefit from the features of “classic” CAN. Looking back into history … the requirement to transmit data between … when CAN was born these ECUs but also to connect sensors and actuators to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Profibus and Modbus: a Comparison
    James Powell, P. Eng. Profibus and Modbus: a comparison We live in a multi-protocol In this article, we will provide an overview col that only Modicon could use. However, of both protocols and discuss their key it was later published royalty-free so that world – and this will likely strengths and applications. Comparing the anyone could use it. Finally, Modicon made not change anytime soon. two, we’ll see that both protocols have their it an open protocol. When it was published, own particular strengths. We’ll also discuss a number of companies started using it, Different protocols work which one works best in which applications creating different interpretations and modi- better in different applica- – although there is some overlap in what fi cations of the original specifi cation. As a each can do. What’s more, they can com- result, there are now quite a few variations tions. I have not come to plement each other in joint applications. in the fi eld. bury Modbus or Profibus, Introduction to Modbus The specifi cation document is fewer than nor to praise them, but 100 pages in length, which is a good indica- rather to add some per- Modbus is the “granddaddy” of industrial tion of the protocol’s low level of complex- communication protocols. It was originally ity. In comparison, Profi bus’ specifi cation spective and knowledge. designed in the mid-1970s by Modicon as document is thousands of pages long. a way to link intelligent devices with PLCs using a simple master/slave concept. The term “Modbus” typically refers to one of three related protocols: Modbus ASCII, “Simple” is a key descriptor for Modbus – Modbus RTU, or Modbus TCP/IP:1 and also its biggest strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethernet/IP and Controlnet to PROFIBUS PA Linking Devices User Manual
    User Manual EtherNet/IP and ControlNet to PROFIBUS PA Linking Devices Catalog Numbers 1788-EN2PAR, 1788-CN2PAR Important User Information Read this document and the documents listed in the additional resources section about installation, configuration, and operation of this equipment before you install, configure, operate, or maintain this product. Users are required to familiarize themselves with installation and wiring instructions in addition to requirements of all applicable codes, laws, and standards. Activities including installation, adjustments, putting into service, use, assembly, disassembly, and maintenance are required to be carried out by suitably trained personnel in accordance with applicable code of practice. If this equipment is used in a manner not specified by the manufacturer, the protection provided by the equipment may be impaired. In no event will Rockwell Automation, Inc. be responsible or liable for indirect or consequential damages resulting from the use or application of this equipment. The examples and diagrams in this manual are included solely for illustrative purposes. Because of the many variables and requirements associated with any particular installation, Rockwell Automation, Inc. cannot assume responsibility or liability for actual use based on the examples and diagrams. No patent liability is assumed by Rockwell Automation, Inc. with respect to use of information, circuits, equipment, or software described in this manual. Reproduction of the contents of this manual, in whole or in part, without written permission of Rockwell Automation, Inc., is prohibited. Throughout this manual, when necessary, we use notes to make you aware of safety considerations. WARNING: Identifies information about practices or circumstances that can cause an explosion in a hazardous environment, which may lead to personal injury or death, property damage, or economic loss.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of CAN / Canopen and the Industrial Ethernet Challenge by Wilfried Voss, President Esd Electronics, Inc USA
    The Future of CAN / CANopen and the Industrial Ethernet Challenge by Wilfried Voss, President esd electronics, Inc USA Industrial Ethernet technologies are a formidable challenge to CANopen as the low-cost industrial networking technology of choice. Ethernet technologies will eventually replace the majority of CANopen applications, at least in regards to new developments. For many years, Controller Area Network (CAN) and CANopen, a higher-layer protocol based on CAN, represented the best choice for low-cost industrial embedded networking. However, since the official introduction of CAN in 1986, there has been a quest to replace CAN and CANopen to overcome the most obvious shortcomings such as limited baud rate and limited network length. Industrial Ethernet technologies are currently the most formidable challenge to CANopen as the low-cost industrial networking technology of choice. Ethernet technologies will eventually replace the majority of CANopen applications, at least in regards to new developments, starting at this very moment in certain areas such as industrial control including motion control and, especially, robotics. Ironically, CAN - the underlying hardware layer of CANopen - has a far greater lifetime expectancy in the North American market than CANopen as a higher layer protocol. However, there can be too much of a good thing, and that is definitely the case when it comes to Ethernet-based fieldbus technologies. There are currently more than 20 different industrial Ethernet solutions available, all with their distinctive advantages and disadvantages, making a pro/contra decision difficult. The major question, besides the technical aspect, is which of these technologies will survive in the market, and how do they support the current need for control components.
    [Show full text]
  • Anybus® Communicator™ CAN PROFINET® IRT (2.32)
    Anybus® Communicator™ CAN PROFINET® IRT (2.32) USER MANUAL SCM-1202-035 1.3 en-US ENGLISH Important User Information Disclaimer The information in this document is for informational purposes only. Please inform HMS Industrial Networks of any inaccuracies or omissions found in this document. HMS Industrial Networks disclaims any responsibility or liability for any errors that may appear in this document. HMS Industrial Networks reserves the right to modify its products in line with its policy of continuous product development. The information in this document shall therefore not be construed as a commitment on the part of HMS Industrial Networks and is subject to change without notice. HMS Industrial Networks makes no commitment to update or keep current the information in this document. The data, examples and illustrations found in this document are included for illustrative purposes and are only intended to help improve understanding of the functionality and handling of the product. In view of the wide range of possible applications of the product, and because of the many variables and requirements associated with any particular implementation, HMS Industrial Networks cannot assume responsibility or liability for actual use based on the data, examples or illustrations included in this document nor for any damages incurred during installation of the product. Those responsible for the use of the product must acquire sufficient knowledge in order to ensure that the product is used correctly in their specific application and that the application meets all performance and safety requirements including any applicable laws, regulations, codes and standards. Further, HMS Industrial Networks will under no circumstances assume liability or responsibility for any problems that may arise as a result from the use of undocumented features or functional side effects found outside the documented scope of the product.
    [Show full text]
  • Sercos III Slave for Am437x — Communication Development Platform
    TI Designs Sercos III Slave For AM437x — Communication Development Platform TI Designs Design Features Industrial Ethernet for Industrial Automation exists in • Sercos III Slave Firmware for PRU-ICSS With more than 20 industrial standards. Some of the well- Sercos MAC-Compliant Register Interface established real-time Ethernet protocols like EtherCAT, • Board Support Package and Industrial Software EtherNet/IP, PROFINET, Sercos III, and PowerLink Development Kit Available From TI and Third-Party require dedicated MAC hardware support in terms of Stack Provider FPGA or ASICs. The Programmable Real-Time Unit inside the Industrial Communication Subsystem (PRU- • Development Platform Includes Schematics, BOM, ICSS), which exists as a hardware block inside the User’s Guide, Application Notes, White Paper, Sitara processors family, replaces FPGA or ASICS Software, Demo, and More with a single chip solution. This TI design describes • PRU-ICSS Supports Other Industrial the Sercos III slave solution firmware for PRU-ICSS. Communication Standards (For Example, EtherCAT, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP, Ethernet Design Resources POWERLINK, Profibus) • PRU-ICSS Firmware is Sercos III Conformance TIDEP0039 Design Folder Tested TMDXIDK437X Tools Folder AM4379 Product Folder Featured Applications TIDEP0001 Tools Folder • Factory Automation and Process Control TIDEP0003 Tools Folder • Motor Drives TIDEP0008 Tools Folder TIDEP0010 Tools Folder • Digital and Analog I/O Modules TIDEP0028 Tools Folder • Industrial Communication Gateways • Sensors, Actuators, and Field Transmitters ASK Our E2E Experts WEBENCH® Calculator Tools Sitara AM437x ARM Cortex-A9 PRU-ICSS processor PHY Sercos III application/profile/ Slave MAC stack PHY An IMPORTANT NOTICE at the end of this TI reference design addresses authorized use, intellectual property matters and other important disclaimers and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Profinet Vs Profibus
    Profinet vs Profibus Pouya Aminaie1 and Poorya Aminaie2 1Department of ECE, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2 Department of ECE, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present a step by step definition of Profinet and Profibus. We introduced different types of each of the two communication protocols. We then described the topology and performance of each one individually. Finally, the properties of them have been compared to show that which one has better performance in the industry. Keywords: Profinet, Profibus, Industrial Ethernet and Communication Networks 1. Introduction 1.1. Profinet Profinet is the abbreviation for Process Field Net, which refers to technical standards for data communication through Ethernet in the industry. These types of standards are used for gathering data and controlling industrial equipment. As can be seen from Fig.1, Profinet satisfies all the needs of industrial technologies. Fig.1 Requirement of automation technology [1] 1 The need for Profinet is felt in production automation and processing automation sections, where its use can resolve many of these needs. Profinet can be divided into two main categories, as follows: • Profinet IO • Profinet CBA 1.2. Profibus The word Profibus is taken from the phrase Process Field Bus. The scope of this protocol covers from the field level to the control level. The advantages of Profibus are as follows: 1. Low noise acceptance due to twisted pair cable being the transmission interface. 2. Appropriate bandwidth due to the use of an appropriate transmission method such as RS485. 3. Secure and non-interfering data exchange for using the token pass access method.
    [Show full text]