DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Budget FY2015 1% for the Environment Green Budget Fiscal Year 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Budget FY2015 1% for the Environment Green Budget Fiscal Year 2015 GREEN BUDGET FY2015 Organizations that Endorse the Green Budget Appalachian Mountain Club Lowell Parks and Conservation Trust Arborway Coalition Mass Audubon Association to Preserve Cape Cod (APCC) Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions Berkshire Natural Resources Council Massachusetts Climate Action Network Boston Harbor Island Alliance Massachusetts Congress of Lake and Pond Associations Boston Park Advocates Massachusetts Energy Consumers Alliance Buzzards Bay Coalition Massachusetts Horticultural Society Charles River Conservancy Massachusetts Land Trust Coalition Charles River Watershed Association Massachusetts Organization of State Engineers and Clean Water Action MA Scientists (MOSES) Conservation Law Foundation Massachusetts Rivers Alliance Emerald Necklace Conservancy Massachusetts Sierra Club Environment Mass Mystic River Watershed Association Environmental Business Council Nashua River Watershed Association Esplanade Association Neponset River Watershed Association Essex County Greenbelt Association New England Wild Flower Society Franklin Land Trust North and South Rivers Watershed Association Franklin Park Coalition OARS: For the Assabet, Sudbury and Concord Rivers Friends of Alewife Reservation Save the Harbor/Save the Bay Friends of the Blue Hills Sudbury Valley Trustees Green Decade Newton Tatnuck Brook Watershed Association Hilltown Anti-Herbicide Coalition The Nature Conservancy - Massachusetts Jones River Watershed Association The Trustees of Reservations Lakes & Ponds Association of Western Massachusetts Environmental League of Massachusetts // Green Budget FY2015 1% for the Environment Green Budget Fiscal Year 2015 Nancy Goodman \\ Erica Mattison February 2014 Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Executive Summary . 2 FY2015 Funding Priorities: Summary Recommendations . 4 Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) . 5 Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) . 11 Department of Fish and Game (DFG) . 17 Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (DAR) . 21 Executive Office of Administration and Finance (A&F) . 22 “Nature is inexhaustibly sustainable if we care for it. It is our universal responsibility to pass a healthy earth onto future generations.” – Sylvia Dolson Cover photo credits Interior photo credits Bicyclist, Chestnut Hill Reservoir, MA: Erica Mattison, ELM p . 3: Charlie Wyman . Courtesy of Mass Audubon Baby, Revere Beach, MA: Eugenia Gibbons, ELM p . 5: MA Dept . of Environmental Protection Lady slippers: Ken Sturm/U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service p . 6: Erica Mattison, ELM Children exploring nature: Mass Audubon’s Boston Nature Center— p . 7: Crugnale Properties LLC Mass Audubon© p . 9: MA Toxics Use Reduction Institute Kayaking group, Concord River, Concord, MA: Dave Griffin . Courtesy p . 10: MA Dept . of Environmental Protection of Mass Rivers Alliance p . 12: David Mussina . Courtesy of Friends of Alewife Reservation Chestnut Hill Reservoir, MA: Erica Mattison, ELM p . 14: Marianna Hagbloom . Pictured: Middlesex Fells Reservation, MA Parker River National Wildlife Refuge, MA: Matt Poole/USFWS p . 15: MA Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs . Farmer’s Market Tomatoes, MA: MA Executive Office of Energy & Pictured: Leominster State Forest, MA Environmental Affairs p . 16: Erica Mattison, ELM Piping Plover: Matt Poole/U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service p . 17: MA Dept . of Fish and Game Solar Panels: MA Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs p . 18: MA Dept . of Fish and Game p . 19: Ron Holmes/U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service p . 21: Erica Mattison, ELM . Pictured: Hadley, MA p . 22: Courtesy of MassGIS Environmental League of Massachusetts // Green Budget FY2015 February 2014 Dear Legislators and Colleagues: Three simple facts are indisputable and interrelated . First, in the aggregate, state spending on environmental protection is less than 1% of the entire state budget . In the past decade, state agencies including the Departments of Environmental Protection, Conservation and Recreation, and Fish and Game have borne deep cuts that have not been fully restored . For a progressive state such as Massachusetts, spending less than 1% is a disgrace . Second, if Superstorm Sandy had moved a few miles further north, Boston and the Massachusetts coastline — instead of New York and New Jersey — would have been devastated . The urgency of dealing with the destructive nature of climate change is readily apparent . More and more is being asked of state agencies, but state agencies cannot achieve their mission without adequate funding . You cannot do more with less…you can only do less with less . Third, there is an inextricable link between investment in environmental protection and the economy . Every dollar we invest in the environment yields a four dollar return, according to a recent report by The Trust for Public Land . With over 5,500 clean energy firms in Massachusetts, this sector now employs approximately 80,000 workers and represents the fastest growing segment of our economy, according to the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center . If Massachusetts can lead the nation with the first offshore wind farm, we will create even more new businesses and jobs that develop new technology in solar, wind, and energy efficiency . Outdoor recreation in Massachusetts is a $10B industry . Agriculture, forestry, and fishing represent another $13B . And if we finally build a 21st century transit system, weatherize older buildings, and modernize our infrastructure to fix gas pipe leaks and our failing water system, we will not only protect our environment but also put the building trades to work . Businesses locate and expand in Massachusetts, not because we are a low-cost state, but because of our talented workforce and quality of life . We must protect our rivers, beaches, forests, and parks if we are to attract the companies and retain the talent that will grow our economy . The connection between the environment and the economy should not be ignored . The bottom line is a triple bottom line . Spending on environmental agencies will protect our environment, strengthen our economy, and make our Commonwealth safer and healthier . But to enjoy a return on investment, we must first make the investment . It starts with this budget . Sincerely, George Bachrach Nancy Goodman Erica Mattison President Vice President for Policy Legislative Director 1 GREEN BUDGET FY2015 Executive Summary Our annual Green Budget How much of the MA budget is beng invested to protect our environment? recommendations seek to ensure that the agencies responsible for protecting 1.6% public health and our natural resources 1.4% have sufficient funding to carry out an increasingly broad array of critical 1.2% responsibilities . 1% 1% .9% .84% .79% .75% .74% .77% Last year, the Massachusetts .8% .73% .71% .73% .60% .60% Legislature increased funding for the .58% .57% .6% environmental agencies by over $12M, an increase of 6% over FY2013 . .4% Despite this step forward, as the .2% state budget has increased overall during the past number of years, 0% FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY 2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 environmental agency funding has not kept pace and continues to This chart represents the percentage of the Massachusetts budget that is invested to protect our environment. The data is based on the General Appropriations Act and does not include supplemental budget figures or 9C cuts. To make accurate comparisons between years, this report does not include the budgets for the Department of Public Utilities and Division of lag . Our natural resources, residents, Energy Resources that were combined with the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs six years ago. These agencies are largely funded through assessments, and so have not been subject to cuts at the same levels as the other environmental visitors, and economy feel the impact agencies. of these cuts . *In FY2001, 1% of the state budget was allocated for environmental agencies ($225.3M of the state’s $22.4B budget). *In FY2014, just 0.6% of the state budget was allocated for environmental agencies ($203.7M of the state’s $34.1B budget). We call for a restoration of environmental funding to 1% of the state budget. This Green Budget highlights priority programs and Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec activities that have been negatively impacted by substantial budget cuts and are in need of heightened investment. Camp Sites Now only open Memorial Day – Labor Day Breakdown of Funding by Agency NOW ONLY OPEN: In FY2014, the environmental agencies’ budgets were Possible with increased funding: Memorial Day – Labor Day mid-April – mid-October 6% lower than they were in FY2008 . Of note, is that the % Change two largest agencies, the Department of Environmental FY2008 to POSSIBLE Protection and the Department of Conservation and FY2008 FY2014SkatingFY2014 Rinks WITH INCREASED FUNDING: mid-April – mid-October Recreation, have borne the deepest cuts . Now don’t open EOEEA $23.3 M $24.7 M until mid-Oct.6% The Green Budget details the important work carried out by our environmental agencies and highlights new DEP $60.0 M $56.5 M Possible with-6 % increased fundng: programs and responsibilities that need support . With cuts DFG $19.2 M $23.2 M open in early17% Sept. NOW DON’T OPEN to federal funding and expanded mandates such as the DCR $96.8 M $79.8 M -21% until mid-October Sustainable Water Management Initiative and dam safety requirements, our environmental agencies require DAR $17.7
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: Outdoor Recreational Resources— Hampshire County
    CHAPTER 4: OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL RESOURCES— HAMPSHIRE COUNTY Introduction With its rolling hills, cascading waters, deep forests, open meadows, and abundance of open space, the Route 112 Scenic Byway corridor is an extraordinary outdoor playground for residents and visitors alike. Opportunities abound in the region to hike, camp, swim, boat, cross‐country ski, hunt, fish, and cycle. In the Hampshire County section of the corridor, there are nearly 30 square miles of open space available for multiple recreational opportunities, including 5,803 acres within state forests and parks, 10,669 acres within wildlife management areas, and 1,919 acres within other significant open space lands. The greatest recreational treasures in Hampshire County include the Westfield River with its federal Wild and Scenic designation, and the extensive 7,900‐acre wilderness area created by the adjoining lands of the Knightville Dam Wildlife Management and Recreation Area, the Gilbert A. Bliss State Forest, and the Hiram H. Fox Wildlife Management Area. This Outdoor Recreational Resources chapter and accompanying map provide an inventory of recreational resources developed through a review of Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation listings, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s MassWildlife listings, information from the Commonwealth’s Office of Geographic and Environmental Information (MassGIS), and narratives within the Open Space and Recreation Plans of Byway towns. Resources are described here by type of facility (State Forest and Parks, and Wildlife The Westfield River Wildwater Races, an annual spring event for more Management Areas) and than 55 years, attracts boating enthusiasts from across the northeast. by type of activity (hiking trails, camping, swimming, boating, cross‐country skiing and snowshoeing, hunting and fishing, bicycling, and golfing).
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Forest Inventory 2014
    Manual for Continuous Forest Inventory Field Procedures Bureau of Forestry Division of State Parks and Recreation February 2014 Massachusetts Department Conservation and Recreation Manual for Continuous Forest Inventory Field Procedures Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation February, 2014 Preface The purpose of this manual is to provide individuals involved in collecting continuous forest inventory data on land administered by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation with clear instructions for carrying out their work. This manual was first published in 1959. It has undergone minor revisions in 1960, 1961, 1964 and 1979, and 2013. Major revisions were made in April, 1968, September, 1978 and March, 1998. This manual is a minor revision of the March, 1998 version and an update of the April 2010 printing. TABLE OF CONTENTS Plot Location and Establishment The Crew 3 Equipment 3 Location of Established Plots 4 The Field Book 4 New CFI Plot Location 4 Establishing a Starting Point 4 The Route 5 Traveling the Route to the Plot 5 Establishing the Plot Center 5 Establishing the Witness Trees 6 Monumentation 7 Establishing the Plot Perimeter 8 Tree Data General 11 Tree Number 11 Azimuth 12 Distance 12 Tree Species 12-13 Diameter Breast Height 13-15 Tree Status 16 Product 17 Sawlog Height 18 Sawlog Percent Soundness 18 Bole Height 19 Bole Percent Soundness 21 Management Potential 21 Sawlog Tree Grade 23 Hardwood Tree Grade 23 Eastern White Pine Tree Grade 24 Quality Determinant 25 Crown Class 26 Mechanical Loss
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Conservation & Recreation
    Appendix X. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION & RECREATION DIVISION OF STATE PARKS & RECREATION BERKSHIRE ECOREGIONS (DCR FACILITIES - COMMUNITY & ACRES) Municipality Area Name Acres DALTON APPALACHIAN TRAIL CORRIDOR 840 EGREMONT 80 GREAT BARRINGTON 51 HINSDALE 6 MONTEREY 56 MOUNT WASHINGTON 353 WASHINGTON 80 Sub-total 1,466 MONTEREY ARTHUR WHARTON SWANN SF 850 Sub-total 850 HINSDALE ASHMERE LAKE SP 180 PERU 22 Sub-total 203 ADAMS ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL 5 Sub-total 5 LANESBOROUGH BALANCE ROCK SP 137 Sub-total 137 MOUNT WASHINGTON BASHBISH FALLS SP 407 Sub-total 407 HANCOCK BATES MEMORIAL SP 421 Sub-total 421 GREAT BARRINGTON BEARTOWN SF 5,011 LEE 634 MONTEREY 3,717 NEW MARLBOROUGH 124 OTIS 199 STOCKBRIDGE 453 TYRINGHAM 384 Sub-total 10,522 BECKET BECKET SF 611 Sub-total 611 CUMMINGTON BRYANT MOUNTAIN SF 617 Sub-total 617 BUCKLAND BUCKLAND SF 93 Sub-total 93 HUNTINGTON C.M. GARDNER SP 85 Sub-total 85 NEW MARLBOROUGH CAMPBELLS FALLS SP 138 Sub-total 138 COLRAIN CATAMOUNT SF 1,344 Landscape Assessment and Forest Management Framework: Berkshire Ecoregions in Massachusetts Sub-total 1,344 BLANDFORD CHESTER-BLANDFORD SF 1,539 CHESTER 1,238 Sub-total 2,777 SANDISFIELD CLAM LAKE F.C. SITE 500 Sub-total 500 CLARKSBURG CLARKSBURG SF 3,305 NORTH ADAMS 96 Sub-total 3,401 CONWAY CONWAY SF 1,702 WILLIAMSBURG 54 Sub-total 1,756 NEW MARLBOROUGH COOKSON SF 2,274 SANDISFIELD 524 Sub-total 2,798 ASHFIELD D.A.R. SF 201 GOSHEN 1,437 Sub-total 1,638 CHESTERFIELD DEAD BRANCH SF 71 Sub-total 71 CUMMINGTON DEER HILL SR 136 PLAINFIELD 215 Sub-total 351 BUCKLAND DUBUQUE MEMORIAL SF 48 HAWLEY 6,258 PLAINFIELD 1,124 WINDSOR 6 Sub-total 7,436 GREAT BARRINGTON EAST MOUNTAIN SF 1,798 NEW MARLBOROUGH 7 SHEFFIELD 199 Sub-total 2,004 FLORIDA FLORIDA SF 1,588 NORTH ADAMS 25 Sub-total 1,613 GREAT BARRINGTON FOUNTAIN POND PARK 250 Sub-total 250 CHESTERFIELD GILBERT A.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Forests at the Crossroads
    MASSACHUSETTS FORESTS AT THE CROSSROADS Forests, Parks, Landscapes, Environment, Quality of Life, Communities and Economy Threatened by Industrial Scale Logging & Biomass Power Deerfield River, Mohawk Trail Windsor State Forest, 2008, “Drinking Water Supply Area, Please protect it!” March 5, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The fate of Massachusetts’ forests is at a crossroads. Taxpayer subsidized policies and proposals enacted and promoted by Governor Patrick’s office of Energy and Environmental Affairs seriously threaten the health, integrity and peaceful existence of Massachusetts forests. All the benefits provided by these forests including wilderness protection, fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, clean water, clean air, tourism, carbon sequestration and scenic beauty are now under threat from proposals to aggressively log parks and forests as outlined below. • About 80% of State forests and parks are slated for logging with only 20% set aside in reserves. (p.4) • Aggressive logging and clear-cutting of State forests and parks has already started and new management plans call for logging rates more than 400% higher than average historical levels. (p. 5-18) • “Clear-cutting and its variants” is proposed for 74% of the logging. Historically, selective logging was common. (p. 5-18) • The timber program costs outweigh its revenue . Taxpayers are paying to cut their own forests.(p.19) • The State has enacted laws and is spending taxpayer money devoted to “green” energy to promote and subsidize the development of at least five wood-fueled, industrial-scale biomass power plants. These plants would require tripling the logging rate on all Massachusetts forests, public and private. At this rate, all forests could be logged in just 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts' Application for Expansion of the Westfield River's Wild and Scenic Designation
    WESTFIELD RIVER WILD AND SCENIC RivER EVALUATION DRAFT 12/18/2002 Findings regarding the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' application for expansion of the Westfield River's Wild and Scenic Designation National Park Service Northeast Region Boston, Massachusetts EVALUATION OF THE WESTFIELD RIVER FOR EXPANSION OF ITS NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER DESIGNATION Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................. 3 Map of Proposed Segments .......................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................ 7 Evaluation of Eligibility and Classification ......................................8 Eligibility and Classification Findings Conclusion State Designation and Management Requirements ..........••............... 14 State Scenic River Designation State and Local River Management Evaluation of Resource Protection and Management..........•............. 16 Protection Mechanisms Management Framework Conclusion Support for Designation ............................................................. 21 Local Government State Government Federal Agencies Private Organizations Federal and State Legislators Conclusion Consideration of Alternatives/Environmental Assessment •.•..............24 Alternatives Evaluated Evaluation of the Alternatives Discussion ofRecommended Action 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Proposal On behalfofthe Commonwealth ofMassachusetts, Acting Governor Jane Swift has proposed to the Secretary of the Interior
    [Show full text]
  • Green Budget FY2017
    1% for the Green Budget Environment • Healthy Communities • Great Parks • Clean, Abundant Water FY2017 February 2016 Below are the 75 organizations that endorse the Green Budget. Environmental League of Massachusetts Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions American Farmland Trust Massachusetts Bicycle Coalition Appalachian Mountain Club Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition Arborway Coalition Massachusetts Climate Action Network Association to Preserve Cape Cod Massachusetts Congress of Lake and Pond Associations Berkshire Environmental Action Team (BEAT) Massachusetts Farm to School Berkshire Grown Massachusetts Forest and Park Friends Network Boston Cyclists Union Massachusetts Horticultural Society Boston Harbor Island Alliance Massachusetts Land Trust Coalition Boston Park Advocates Massachusetts League of Environmental Voters Brookline GreenSpace Alliance Massachusetts PipeLine Awareness Network (MassPLAN) Buzzards Bay Coalition Massachusetts Organization of State Engineers and Scientists Charles River Conservancy Massachusetts Rivers Alliance Charles River Watershed Association Massachusetts Smart Growth Alliance Clean Water Action Massachusetts Society of Municipal Conservation Professionals Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture (CISA) Massachusetts Watershed Coalition Connecticut River Watershed Council Merrimack River Watershed Council Conservation Law Foundation Millers River Watershed Council East Quabbin Land Trust Mount Grace Land Conservation Trust Emerald Necklace Conservancy Mystic River Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Norwich Hill Wildlife Sanctuary
    summer 2012 JOIN US ASK A FRIEND OR TWO OR THREE TO JOIN US, TOO. BETTER YET, GIVE THEM THE GIFT OF A MEMBERSHIP TO THE HILLTOWN LAND TRUST. HILLTOWN LAND TRUST 332 BULLITT ROAD ASHFIELD, MA 01330 $35 PER YEAR (OUR BASIC “LAND LOVER”) $50 PER YEAR Norwich Hill Wildlife Sanctuary $100 PER YEAR $500 PER YEAR f you drive along Route 66 in The Sanctuary was once part of In 1968, Mr Hayes sold the $ _____ (OTHER) PER YEAR IHuntington and turn onto Searle a 160 acre farm, which first appears farm to Ernest and Lynnea Whitten, Road, then left on Cullen Hill in the records (Forbes Library) of who kept up the farm and fields but NAME Road, you will pass by the restored 1799, owned by a Lyman, who did not farm it. Later, Mr Whitten _____________________________ North Hall on the right. Continue built the farmhouse which still sold all but the 65 acres that is ADDRESS on Cullen Hill as it turns into a stands—though renovated many now the Norwich Hill Sanctuary. Hike to Warner Falls with Rich Fournier _____________________________ discontinued road, and you will times. One of the names appearing Lynnea Whitten kept the farm, but be surrounded by what will soon in the deed in the 19th century was worried what would happen to it in _____________________________ be Hilltown Land Trust’s newest that of Moses Hannum, who leased the future. Conservation Restriction land: the a quarter-acre from the owners, The farm’s transition to Norwich Hill Wildlife Sanctuary. probably to expand the Hannum conserved land was accomplished Much of the 65 acres is Mill.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Published February 15, 2019 Prepared by the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance Carol W. Gladstone, Commissioner This page was intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Report Organization 5 Table 1 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 11 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 2 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by County 17 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 3 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office and Agency 23 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 4 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Site and Municipality 85 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 5 Commonwealth Active Lease Agreements by Municipality 303 Private leases through DCAMM on behalf of state agencies APPENDICES Appendix I Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 311 Version of Table 1 above but for State-owned only (excludes Authorities) Appendix II County-Owned Buildings Occupied by Sheriffs and the Trial Court 319 Appendix III List of Conservation/Agricultural/Easements Held by the Commonwealth 323 Appendix IV Data Sources 381 Appendix V Glossary of Terms 385 Appendix VI Municipality Associated Counties Index Key 393 3 This page was intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Commissioner of Conservation and State Forester
    'ublic Document No. 73 Cfje Commontoealtt) of 0La0$at$u0ttt$ ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Commissioner of Conservation AND The State Forester and Director of Parks FOR THE YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 1936 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION [Offices: 20 Somerset Street, Boston, Mass.] Publication of this Document approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance 600. 2-'37. Order 9869. : APR 7 1937 Z\)t Commontoealtf) of 4Ha£tfacfm*etta Outline of the REPORT^ OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION For convenience and economy this report is divided as follows Part I. The organization and general work of the Department of Ca servation. Part II. The Division of Forestry. Part III. The Division of Parks. Part IV. The Division of Fisheries and Game. (Part IV is printed separa as Public Document Xo. 25.) PART I. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CONSERVATIO The thirty-third annual report of the Commissioner of Conservation is herel submitted, in compliance with the statute. On December 5, 1935, Ernest J. Dean of Chilmark was appointed Commission of Conservation and State Forester, replacing Samuel A. York, who had sera since April, 1933. On January 22, 1936, the Governor appointed Patrick V Hehir, Director of the Division of Fisheries and Game, replacing Raymond Kenney who had served since July 1, 1931, in this capacity. GEORGE A. SMITH On October 26 the Department of Conservation sustained a great loss in th death of Mr. George A. Smith, Chief Moth Suppressor, who had been associate with the Department for approximately 31 years. Employed first as an inspector, he was promoted to agent and later became a Assistant Forester.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Managers Database
    Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission ASMFC Habitat Managers Database ASMFC Habitat Management Series # 6 December 2000 ASMFC Habitat Management Series #6 ASMFC Habitat Managers Database Compiled by C. Dianne Stephan1 Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Karen Greene2 Fisheries Consultant and Robin L. Peuser Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1444 Eye Street, NW, Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Authors current addresses: 1National Marine Fisheries Service, 1 Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930; 25924 Jessup Lane, Woodbridge, VA 22193. Acknowledgements This document was prepared with assistance from a great number of people who provided information or reviewed the accuracy of the draft document. The document was a number of years in the making, and the authors apologize in advance for any folks we may have neglected to acknowledge. Individuals who provided information or reviewed drafts include: Seth Barker (ME DMR), David Bower (VA MRC), Scott Carney (PA FBC), Lou Chiarella (NMFS), Ted Diers (NH OSP), Rob Dunlap (SC DNR), Tim Goodger (NMFS), Karen Greene (NMFS), Pat Hughes (NC DCM), Eric Hutchins (NMFS), Bill Ingham (NH F&G), Mark Jacobsen (NOAA/NOS), Rick Jacobson (CT DEP), Charlie Lesser (DE DNREC), Lenny Nero (FL DEP), Art Newell (NY DEC), Vern Nulk (NMFS), Randy Owen (VA MRC), Joe Pelczarski (MA DCM), Chris Powell (RI DFW), Susan Shipman (GA DNR), Stuart Stevens (GA DNR). The ASMFC Habitat and FMPs Committee provided oversight for the development of this document. The Committee currently includes Pat Hughes (NC CZM, Co-chair), Lenny Nero (FL DEP, Co-chair), Tom Bigford (NMFS), Wilson Laney (USFWS), and Ralph Spagnolo (EPA).
    [Show full text]
  • This Listing of DCR Properties Is Meant to Supplement the Landscape Designations Map with Additional Information
    This listing of DCR properties is meant to supplement the Landscape Designations map with additional information. It shows how many acres from each property are assigned to each landscape designation, but cannot detail which parts of each property are assigned to each designation – please see the maps for that information. The properties below are listed as named in DCR's GIS databases; GIS names may not match all names posted at facilities or known locally. The column labeled "ELU" identifies in which Ecological Land Unit the property belongs. Properties in the same ELU share similar landscape characteristics and are not necessarily linked geographically. ELU Reserves Woodlands Parklands Site name Total acres in facility Group (acres) (acres) (acres) ABIGAIL ADAMS STATE PARK 10 - - 9 9 ACUSHNET CEDAR SWAMP STATE RESERVATION 7 2,104 - - 2,104 ALEWIFE BROOK PARKWAY 0 - - 3 3 ALEWIFE BROOK RESERVATION 10 - - 136 136 ALLIED VETERANS RINK 0 - - 3 3 AMELIA EARHART DAM 0 - - 2 2 AMES NOWELL STATE PARK 7 - - 612 612 ANGLE TREE MONUMENT RESERVATION 0 - - 0 0 ANTHONY A. LACONTE RINK 0 - - 1 1 APPALACHIAN TRAIL CORRIDOR 0 - - 129 129 APPALACHIAN TRAIL CORRIDOR 1 3 - - 106 106 APPALACHIAN TRAIL CORRIDOR 2 3 - - 462 462 APPALACHIAN TRAIL CORRIDOR 3 3 343 - - 343 ARTHUR WHARTON SWANN SF 3 799 - 51 850 ASHBURNHAM STATE FOREST 5 - 2,211 - 2,211 ASHLAND STATE PARK 7 - - 472 472 ASHMERE LAKE STATE PARK 5 - - 205 205 ASHUWILLTICOOK RAIL TRAIL 0 - - 8 8 ATTITASH PUBLIC ACCESS 0 - - 0 0 BAKER CHOCOLATE FACTORY 0 - - 0 0 BALANCE ROCK STATE PARK 1 - 116 21
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Outdoor Recreation
    TO PORTSMOUTH, NH, MAINE 95 AMESBURY Massachusetts Outdoor Recreation Map SalisburySALISBURY Salt Marsh MERRIMAC 110 74 WMA 1A Salisbury Beach Maudslay State Reservation Guide to Properties W E S T E R N P I O N E E R V A L L E Y / N O R T H E A S T State Park NEWBURY- 76 PORT75 Plum Island State Reservation 1 HAVERHILL Crane L E G E N D M A S S A C H U S E T T S C O N N E C T I C U T V A L L E Y M A S S A C H U S E T T S 167 113 PonWdEST Martin 168 NEWBWMURYA NEWBurnBURYs WMA Clarksburg TO MANCHESTER, 495 123 State Forest Clarksburg V E R TO CONCORD, NH. GROVELAND 77 A M O N T BRATTLEBORO, VT. 145 3 1 DCR State and Urban Parks Taconic Trail p CLARKS­ State Park A A p BURG MONROE 97 State Park a 186 l Satan's Kingdom WMA a Natural 112 Pauchog Bk. WMA METHUEN c N E W H A M 193 125 78 William Forward WMA h Leyden P S H I R E GEORGETOWN ROWLEY i Bridge ROWE 142 TO 2 172 a H.O. Cook BERNARDS­ 35 Warwick 133 Georgetown- n State Pk State Royalston Watatic Mtn. WS NASHUA, NH. LAWRENCE Monroe State Forest Shattuck State Forest T TON Rowley 133 Sandy Point DCR Water Supply Protection Areas r FLORIDA Forest 12 123 13 Lawrence IPSWICH Halibut Point a 171 State Forest 8 Fish SF Ashburnham 31 Baldplate i A Brook WMA Northfield SF Ashby State State Reservation l Western 119 Brook ASHBY 113 HSP 1A State Park Birch WINCHENDOStateN Forest 111 Pond State WILLIAMS­ Gateway NORTH COLRAIN LEYDEN 68 WMA Townsend r Forest WMA e 73 79 HEATH ROYALSTON PEPPERELL DUNSTABLE v NORTH Forest TOWN ADAMS Leyden Bennett Hill WMA State Forest Nissitissit River i HSP TullyMtn.
    [Show full text]