Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons: B-Mesogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons: B-Mesogenesis Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons: B-Mesogenesis Miguel Escudero Abenza [email protected] arXiv:1810.00880, PRD 99, 035031 (2019) with: Gilly Elor & Ann Nelson Based on: arXiv:2101.XXXXX with: Gonzalo Alonso-Álvarez & Gilly Elor New Trends in Dark Matter 09-12-2020 The Universe Baryonic Matter 5% 26% Dark Matter 69% Dark Energy Planck 2018 1807.06209 Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !2 Theoretical Understanding? Motivating Question: What fraction of the Energy Density of the Universe comes from Physics Beyond the Standard Model? 99.85%! Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !3 SM Prediction: Neutrinos 40% 60% Photons Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !4 The Universe Baryonic Matter 5% 26% Dark Matter 69% Dark Energy Planck 2018 1807.06209 Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !5 Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons: B-Mesogenesis arXiv:1810.00880 Elor, Escudero & Nelson 1) Baryogenesis and Dark Matter are linked 2) Baryon asymmetry directly related to B-Meson observables 3) Leads to unique collider signatures 4) Fully testable at current collider experiments Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !6 Outline 1) B-Mesogenesis 1) C/CP violation 2) Out of equilibrium 3) Baryon number violation? 2) A Minimal Model & Cosmology 3) Implications for Collider Experiments 4) Dark Matter Phenomenology 5) Summary and Outlook Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !7 Baryogenesis The three Sakharov Conditions (1967): 1) C and CP violation 2) Out of equilibrium 3) Baryon number violation Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !8 <latexit sha1_base64="zFG6VmB4Ewby2UYbWvzeruFkVbc=">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</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="W0C5nMI4f6WQUpnfqpHAThSUEAU=">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</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="pvsPKRvZQQehjg7dUEib/+Y+HZ8=">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</latexit> Baryogenesis from B Mesons 1) C and CP violation The key quantity: the semileptonic asymmetry, q 0 0 0 0 ¯ q Γ12 Γ(Bq Bq f) Γ(Bq Bq f) ASL =Im q = 0 ! ! − ! 0 ! M12 Γ(B B0 f)+Γ(B0 B f¯) ✓ ◆ q ! q ! q ! q ! d 4 A SM =( 4.7 0.4) 10− Standard Model SL| − ± ⇥ small because s 5 (mb/mt)2 is small Lenz & Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi A SM =(2.1 0.2) 10− 1912.07621 SL| ± ⇥ d 3 ASL =( 2.1 1.7) 10− World averages Measurements − ± ⇥ s 3 (HFLAV) A =( 0.6 2.8) 10− SL − ± ⇥ • Plenty of BSM models that can enlarge the asymmetries up to 10-3: SUSY, Extradim, LR, 2HDM, new generations, Leptoquarks, Z' models (see e.g. 1511.09466, 1402.1181). Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !9 Baryogenesis from B Mesons 2) Out of equilibrium and production of B Mesons • Require the presence of an out of equilibrium particle that dominates the energy density of the Universe and reheats it to a temperature of T = (10 MeV) RH O • This particle should be very weakly coupled, with lifetimes 3 ⌧ = (10− s) Φ O • The decays don't spoil BBN or the CMB provided TRH > 5 MeV de Salas et al. 1511.00672 Hasegawa et al. 1908.10189 Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !10 Baryogenesis from B Mesons 2) Out of equilibrium and production of B Mesons ¯b • Scalar particle with m Φ 11 100 GeV and 3 2 − Φ ⌧ = (10 − s) generically decays into b-quarks Φ O b b-quarks Hadronize at T<T 200 MeV • QCD ⇠ e± e± • Coherent oscillations in the B0 system are maintained in the early Universe for Temperatures: T . 20 MeV B0 B0 Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !11 Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons 3) Baryon number violation? •Baryon number is conserved in our scenario: ∆B =0 In a similar spirit to Hylogenesis by Davoudiasl, Morrissey, Sigurdson, Tulin 1008.2399 •We make Dark Matter an anti-Baryon and generate an asymmetry between the two sectors thanks to the CP violating oscillations and subsequents decays of B-mesons. •Require a new decay mode of the B meson into DM and a visible Baryon! Visible Sector Dark Sector (Baryons) (anti-Baryons) Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !12 <latexit sha1_base64="IwfEMSIr/nMLl8C6w+VywIsDlyI=">AAAB+XicbVC7SgNBFJ2Nrxhfq5Y2Q4KQKuyKEO2iNhYWEc0DknWZncwmQ2Zml5nZQFjyJdpYKGLrV9jaiX6Mk0ehiQcuHM65l3vvCWJGlXacTyuztLyyupZdz21sbm3v2Lt7dRUlEpMajlgkmwFShFFBappqRpqxJIgHjDSC/sXYbwyIVDQSt3oYE4+jrqAhxUgbybdtaHDmp23J4c3V6E75dsEpORPAReLOSKGSL35/ld/vq7790e5EOOFEaMyQUi3XibWXIqkpZmSUayeKxAj3UZe0DBWIE+Wlk8tH8NAoHRhG0pTQcKL+nkgRV2rIA9PJke6peW8s/ue1Eh2eeCkVcaKJwNNFYcKgjuA4BtihkmDNhoYgLKm5FeIekghrE1bOhODOv7xI6kcl97h0em3SOAdTZMEByIMicEEZVMAlqIIawGAAHsATeLZS69F6sV6nrRlrNrMP/sB6+wGKyJYS</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="pQKFDwpgZL5nXlJtOOyKMf/Ap38=">AAAB+XicbVC7SgNBFJ2Nrxhfq5Y2Q4KQKuyKEO2iNhYWEc0DknWZnZ0kQ2Zml5nZQFjyJdpYKGLrV9jaiX6Mk0ehiQcuHM65l3vvCWJGlXacTyuztLyyupZdz21sbm3v2Lt7dRUlEpMajlgkmwFShFFBappqRpqxJIgHjDSC/sXYbwyIVDQSt3oYE4+jrqAdipE2km/b0ODMT9uSw5ur0V3o2wWn5EwAF4k7I4VKvvj9VX6/r/r2RzuMcMKJ0JghpVquE2svRVJTzMgo104UiRHuoy5pGSoQJ8pLJ5eP4KFRQtiJpCmh4UT9PZEirtSQB6aTI91T895Y/M9rJbpz4qVUxIkmAk8XdRIGdQTHMcCQSoI1GxqCsKTmVoh7SCKsTVg5E4I7//IiqR+V3OPS6bVJ4xxMkQUHIA+KwAVlUAGXoApqAIMBeABP4NlKrUfrxXqdtmas2cw++APr7Qd0DJYD</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="kDRvtt3U4Srq3u5tlkyarMGaaSg=">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</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="neziFXH4rj+jAhWlWDCqtXw8t7I=">AAACJnicbVDLSgNBEJz1bXytevQyGARFCLsSUA+CxIsXIYKJgewSZie9yeDsg5leMSz5Gi/+ihcPERFvfoqTB6LRgoGiqprpriCVQqPjfFgzs3PzC4tLy4WV1bX1DXtzq66TTHGo8UQmqhEwDVLEUEOBEhqpAhYFEm6Du4uhf3sPSoskvsFeCn7EOrEIBWdopJZ95iE8YF5RfepJCHGfVqiHCfVSLegh9SKGXc5kXukffvMrk1Wi08WDll10Ss4I9C9xJ6RIJqi27IHXTngWQYxcMq2brpOinzOFgkvoF7xMQ8r4HetA09CYRaD9fHRmn+4ZpU3DRJkXIx2pPydyFmndiwKTHK6qp72h+J/XzDA88XMRpxlCzMcfhZmkpodhZ7QtFHCUPUMYV8LsSnmXKcbRNFswJbjTJ/8l9aOSWy6dXpeL55VJHUtkh+ySfeKSY3JOLkmV1Agnj+SZDMir9WS9WG/W+zg6Y01mtskvWJ9fKVulAg==</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="J8LRqHVFC3Qjbgoq2U/f1+E13Kk=">AAACAHicbVDJSgNBEO1xjXGLevDgpTEIHiTMSES9Bb14EaJkg0wIPZ1K0qRnobtGDMNc/BUvHhTx6md482/sLAdNfFDweK+KqnpeJIVG2/62FhaXlldWM2vZ9Y3Nre3czm5Nh7HiUOWhDFXDYxqkCKCKAiU0IgXM9yTUvcH1yK8/gNIiDCo4jKDls14guoIzNFI7t19p31NXC586Z+6Ji/CIyS3U0nYubxfsMeg8caYkT6Yot3NfbifksQ8Bcsm0bjp2hK2EKRRcQpp1Yw0R4wPWg6ahAfNBt5LxAyk9MkqHdkNlKkA6Vn9PJMzXeuh7ptNn2Nez3kj8z2vG2L1oJSKIYoSATxZ1Y0kxpKM0aEco4CiHhjCuhLmV8j5TjKPJLGtCcGZfnie104JTLFzeFfOlq2kcGXJADskxccg5KZEbUiZVwklKnskrebOerBfr3fqYtC5Y05k98gfW5w9ChJWW</latexit> A Summary of B-Mesogenesis Out of equilibrium B-mesons decay into CP violating oscillations late time decay Dark Matter and hadrons + 0 0 Dark Matter ¯ B Bd Bs b (anti-Baryon) Φ B ¯0 ¯0 b B− Bd Bs ⇤ Baryon d s TR 15 MeV A A Br (B + + ) ⇠ SL SL ! B M Baryogenesis Dark Matter and 11 2 Y =8.7 10− ⌦ h =0.12 B ⇥ DM q 11 Br(B + + ) ASL With: Y 8.7 10− ! B M ↵ B ' ⇥ 10 2 q 10 4 − q − X Miguel Escudero (TUM) B-Mesogenesis New Trends in DM 09-12-20 !13 <latexit sha1_base64="gZ1th97aPb1QyS5GqZjDBpT3sLo=">AAACFXicbVDLSgNBEJz1GdfXqnjyMhgEDxJ2RVAvEvTiRVAwD8kuYXbSSQZnH8z0imHJd3j2qt/gTbx69hP8CyePQzQWNBRV3XRRYSqFRtf9smZm5+YXFgtL9vLK6tq6s7FZ1UmmOFR4IhNVD5kGKWKooEAJ9VQBi0IJtfD+YuDXHkBpkcS32EshiFgnFm3BGRqp6WxfNe/oGfVKh/6Bj/CI+S1U+02n6JbcIeg08cakSMa4bjrffivhWQQxcsm0bnhuikHOFAouoW/7mYaU8XvWgYahMYtAB/kwfp/uGaVF24kyEyMdqpMXOYu07kWh2YwYdvVfbyD+5zUybJ8EuYjTDCHmo0ftTFJM6KAL2hIKOMqeIYwrYbJS3mWKcTSN2XuTbx5HWW3bNt14f5uYJtXDkndUOr05KpbPxy0VyA7ZJfvEI8ekTC7JNakQTnLyTF7Iq/VkvVnv1sdodcYa32yRX7A+fwByg50e</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="ZXlQ5Tn94niZinhev6HnlqNmJsQ=">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</latexit>
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 17 : the Cosmic Microwave Background
    Let’s think about the early Universe… Lecture 17 : The Cosmic ! From Hubble’s observations, we know the Universe is Microwave Background expanding ! This can be understood theoretically in terms of solutions of GR equations !Discovery of the Cosmic Microwave ! Earlier in time, all the matter must have been Background (ch 14) squeezed more tightly together ! If crushed together at high enough density, the galaxies, stars, etc could not exist as we see them now -- everything must have been different! !The Hot Big Bang This week: read Chapter 12/14 in textbook 4/15/14 1 4/15/14 3 Let’s think about the early Universe… Let’s think about the early Universe… ! From Hubble’s observations, we know the Universe is ! From Hubble’s observations, we know the Universe is expanding expanding ! This can be understood theoretically in terms of solutions of ! This can be understood theoretically in terms of solutions of GR equations GR equations ! Earlier in time, all the matter must have been squeezed more tightly together ! If crushed together at high enough density, the galaxies, stars, etc could not exist as we see them now -- everything must have been different! ! What was the Universe like long, long ago? ! What were the original contents? ! What were the early conditions like? ! What physical processes occurred under those conditions? ! How did changes over time result in the contents and structure we see today? 4/15/14 2 4/15/14 4 The Poetic Version ! In a brilliant flash about fourteen billion years ago, time and matter were born in a single instant of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Peering Into the Universe and Its Ele Mentary
    A gigantic detector to explore elementary particle unification theories and the mysteries of the Universe’s evolution Peering into the Universe and its ele mentary particles from underground Ultrasensitive Photodetectors The planned Hyper-Kamiokande detector will consist of an Unified Theory and explain the evolution of the Universe order of magnitude larger tank than the predecessor, Super- through the investigation of proton decay, CP violation (the We have been developing the world’s largest photosensors, which exhibit a photodetection Kamiokande, and will be equipped with ultra high sensitivity difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos), and the efficiency two times greater than that of the photosensors. The Hyper-Kamiokande detector is both a observation of neutrinos from supernova explosions. The Super-Kamiokande photosensors. These new “microscope,” used to observe elementary particles, and a Hyper-Kamiokande experiment is an international research photosensors are able to perform light intensity “telescope”, used to study the Sun and supernovas through project aiming to become operational in the second half of and timing measurements with a much higher neutrinos. Hyper-Kamiokande aims to elucidate the Grand the 2020s. precision. The new Large-Aperture High-Sensitivity Hybrid Photodetector (left), the new Large-Aperture High-Sensitivity Photomultiplier Tube (right). The bottom photographs show the electron multiplication component. A megaton water tank The huge Hyper-Kamiokande tank will be used in order to obtain in only 10 years an amount of data corresponding to 100 years of data collection time using Super-Kamiokande. This Experimental Technique allows the observation of previously unrevealed The photosensors on the tank wall detect the very weak Cherenkov rare phenomena and small values of CP light emitted along its direction of travel by a charged particle violation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Matter – Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe and Baryogenesis
    The matter – antimatter asymmetry of the universe and baryogenesis Andrew Long Lecture for KICP Cosmology Class Feb 16, 2017 Baryogenesis Reviews in General • Kolb & Wolfram’s Baryon Number Genera.on in the Early Universe (1979) • Rio5o's Theories of Baryogenesis [hep-ph/9807454]} (emphasis on GUT-BG and EW-BG) • Rio5o & Trodden's Recent Progress in Baryogenesis [hep-ph/9901362] (touches on EWBG, GUTBG, and ADBG) • Dine & Kusenko The Origin of the Ma?er-An.ma?er Asymmetry [hep-ph/ 0303065] (emphasis on Affleck-Dine BG) • Cline's Baryogenesis [hep-ph/0609145] (emphasis on EW-BG; cartoons!) Leptogenesis Reviews • Buchmuller, Di Bari, & Plumacher’s Leptogenesis for PeDestrians, [hep-ph/ 0401240] • Buchmulcer, Peccei, & Yanagida's Leptogenesis as the Origin of Ma?er, [hep-ph/ 0502169] Electroweak Baryogenesis Reviews • Cohen, Kaplan, & Nelson's Progress in Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/ 9302210] • Trodden's Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/9803479] • Petropoulos's Baryogenesis at the Electroweak Phase Transi.on, [hep-ph/ 0304275] • Morrissey & Ramsey-Musolf Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/1206.2942] • Konstandin's Quantum Transport anD Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/ 1302.6713] Constituents of the Universe formaon of large scale structure (galaxy clusters) stars, planets, dust, people late ame accelerated expansion Image stolen from the Planck website What does “ordinary matter” refer to? Let’s break it down to elementary particles & compare number densities … electron equal, universe is neutral proton x10 billion 3⇣(3) 3 3 n =3 T 168 cm− neutron x7 ⌫ ⇥ 4⇡2 ⌫ ' matter neutrinos photon positron =0 2⇣(3) 3 3 n = T 413 cm− γ ⇡2 CMB ' anti-proton =0 3⇣(3) 3 3 anti-neutron =0 n =3 T 168 cm− ⌫¯ ⇥ 4⇡2 ⌫ ' anti-neutrinos antimatter What is antimatter? First predicted by Dirac (1928).
    [Show full text]
  • Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons
    Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B mesons Abstract: In [1] a new mechanism to simultaneously generate the baryon asymmetry of the Universe and the Dark Matter abundance has been proposed. The Standard Model of particle physics succeeds to describe many physical processes and it has been tested to a great accuracy. However, it fails to provide a Dark Matter candidate, a so far undetected component of matter which makes up roughly 25% of the energy budget of the Universe. Furthermore, the question arises why there is a more matter (or baryons) than antimatter in the Universe taking into account that cosmology predicts a Universe with equal parts matter and anti-matter. The mechanism to generate a primordial matter-antimatter asymmetry is called baryogenesis. Any successful mechanism for baryogenesis needs to satisfy the three Sakharov conditions [2]: • violation of charge symmetry and of the combination of charge and parity symmetry • violation of baryon number • departure from thermal equilibrium In this paper [1] a new mechanism for the generation of a baryon asymmetry together with Dark Matter production has been proposed. The mechanism proposed to explain the observed baryon asymetry as well as the pro- duction of dark matter is developed around a fundamental ingredient: a new scalar particle Φ. The Φ particle is massive and would dominate the energy density of the Universe after inflation but prior to the Bing Bang nucleosynthesis. The same particle will directly decay, out of thermal equilibrium, to b=¯b quarks and if the Universe is cool enough ∼ O(10 MeV), the produced b quarks can hadronize and form B-mesons.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Electric Dipole Moments and Cp Violation
    261 ATOMIC ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENTS AND CP VIOLATION S.M.Barr Bartol Research Institute University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 USA Abstract The subject of atomic electric dipole moments, the rapid recent progress in searching for them, and their significance for fundamental issues in particle theory is surveyed. particular it is shown how the edms of different kinds of atoms and molecules, as well Inas of the neutron, give vital information on the nature and origin of CP violation. Special stress is laid on supersymmetric theories and their consequences. 262 I. INTRODUCTION In this talk I am going to discuss atomic and molecular electric dipole moments (edms) from a particle theorist's point of view. The first and fundamental point is that permanent electric dipole moments violate both P and T. If we assume, as we are entitled to do, that OPT is conserved then we may speak equivalently of T-violation and OP-violation. I will mostly use the latter designation. That a permanent edm violates T is easily shown. Consider a proton. It has a magnetic dipole moment oriented along its spin axis. Suppose it also has an electric edm oriented, say, parallel to the magnetic dipole. Under T the electric dipole is not changed, as the spatial charge distribution is unaffected. But the magnetic dipole changes sign because current flows are reversed by T. Thus T takes a proton with parallel electric and magnetic dipoles into one with antiparallel moments. Now, if T is assumed to be an exact symmetry these two experimentally distinguishable kinds of proton will have the same mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Evolution of the Universe Baryogenesis
    Physics 224 Spring 2008 Origin and Evolution of the Universe Baryogenesis Lecture 18 - Monday Mar 17 Joel Primack University of California, Santa Cruz Post-Inflation Baryogenesis: generation of excess of baryon (and lepton) number compared to anti-baryon (and anti-lepton) number. in order to create the observed baryon number today it is only necessary to create an excess of about 1 quark and lepton for every ~109 quarks+antiquarks and leptons +antileptons. Other things that might happen Post-Inflation: Breaking of Pecci-Quinn symmetry so that the observable universe is composed of many PQ domains. Formation of cosmic topological defects if their amplitude is small enough not to violate cosmological bounds. There is good evidence that there are no large regions of antimatter (Cohen, De Rujula, and Glashow, 1998). It was Andrei Sakharov (1967) who first suggested that the baryon density might not represent some sort of initial condition, but might be understandable in terms of microphysical laws. He listed three ingredients to such an understanding: 1. Baryon number violation must occur in the fundamental laws. At very early times, if baryon number violating interactions were in equilibrium, then the universe can be said to have “started” with zero baryon number. Starting with zero baryon number, baryon number violating interactions are obviously necessary if the universe is to end up with a non-zero asymmetry. As we will see, apart from the philosophical appeal of these ideas, the success of inflationary theory suggests that, shortly after the big bang, the baryon number was essentially zero. 2. CP-violation: If CP (the product of charge conjugation and parity) is conserved, every reaction which produces a particle will be accompanied by a reaction which produces its antiparticle at precisely the same rate, so no baryon number can be generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetics of Spontaneous Baryogenesis
    Kinetics of Spontaneous Baryogenesis Elena Arbuzova Dubna University & Novosibirsk State University based on common work with A.D. Dolgov and V.A. Novikov arXiv:1607.01247 The 10th APCTP-BLTP/JINR-RCNP-RIKEN Joint Workshop on Nuclear and Hadronic Physics Aug. 17 - Aug. 21, 2016, RIKEN, Wako, Japan E. Arbuzova () Kinetics of SBG August 18 1 / 30 Outline Introduction Generalities about SBG Evolution of Baryon Asymmetry Kinetic Equation in Time-dependent Background Conclusions E. Arbuzova () Kinetics of SBG August 18 2 / 30 Standard Cosmological Model (SCM) The Standard Model of Cosmology: the Standard Model of particle physics ) matter content General Relativity ) gravitational interaction the inflationary paradigm ) to fix a few problems of the scenario SCM explains a huge amount of observational data: Hubble's law the primordial abundance of light elements the cosmic microwave background E. Arbuzova () Kinetics of SBG August 18 3 / 30 Some Puzzles Matter Inventory of the Universe: Baryonic matter (mainly protons and neutrons): 5%. Dark matter (weakly interactive particles not belonging to the MSM of particle physics): 25%. Dark energy: 70% of the Universe is really a mystery looking like a uniformly distributed substance with an unusual equation of state P ≈ −%. DE is responsible for the contemporary accelerated expansion of the Universe. The mechanism of inflation still remains at the level of paradigm. It does not fit the framework of the Standard Model of particle physics. Matter-antimatter asymmetry around us: the local Universe is clearly
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 8 : Baryogenesis
    Lesson 8 : Baryogenesis Notes from Prof. Susskind video lectures publicly available on YouTube 1 Introduction Baryogenesis means the creation of matter particles. Its study is more specifically concerned with explaining the excess of matter over antimatter in the universe. The conditions which explain the imbalance of particles and antiparticles are called nowadays the Sakharov conditions 1. In the previous chapter, we studied several landmarks in the temperature of the universe. Going backwads in time, we met the decoupling time when the universe become trans- parent. The temperature was about 4000°. Further back at T ≈ 1010 degrees, photons could create electron-positron pairs. Protons had already been created earlier. Even further back at T ≈ 1012 or 1013, photons could create proton-antiproton pairs. More accurately they could create quark-antiquark pairs, because in truth it was too hot for protons to exist as such. But, at that temperature, let’s say by convention that when we talk about a proton we really talk about three quarks. It does not make any difference in the reasonings. 1. Named after Andrei Sakharov (1921 - 1989), Russian nuclear physicist. Sakharov published his work on this in 1967 in Russian and it remained little known until the 1980s. In the meantime, the same conditions were rediscovered in 1980 by Savas Dimopoulos and Leonard Susskind who were trying to answer the question of why the number of photons, which is a measure of the entropy of the universe, exceeds by eight orders of magnitude the number of protons or electrons. Thus for a time the conditions were known in the West as the Dimopoulos-Susskind conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Lecture 2 Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe. What's
    Outline of Lecture 2 Baryon asymmetry of the Universe. What’s the problem? Electroweak baryogenesis. Electroweak baryon number violation Electroweak transition What can make electroweak mechanism work? Dark energy Baryon asymmetry of the Universe There is matter and no antimatter in the present Universe. Baryon-to-photon ratio, almost constant in time: nB 10 ηB = 6 10− ≡ nγ · Baryon-to-entropy, constant in time: n /s = 0.9 10 10 B · − What’s the problem? Early Universe (T > 1012 K = 100 MeV): creation and annihilation of quark-antiquark pairs ⇒ n ,n n q q¯ ≈ γ Hence nq nq¯ 9 − 10− nq + nq¯ ∼ How was this excess generated in the course of the cosmological evolution? Sakharov conditions To generate baryon asymmetry, three necessary conditions should be met at the same cosmological epoch: B-violation C-andCP-violation Thermal inequilibrium NB. Reservation: L-violation with B-conservation at T 100 GeV would do as well = Leptogenesis. & ⇒ Can baryon asymmetry be due to electroweak physics? Baryon number is violated in electroweak interactions. Non-perturbative effect Hint: triangle anomaly in baryonic current Bµ : 2 µ 1 gW µνλρ a a ∂ B = 3colors 3generations ε F F µ 3 · · · 32π2 µν λρ ! "Bq a Fµν: SU(2)W field strength; gW : SU(2)W coupling Likewise, each leptonic current (n = e, µ,τ) g2 ∂ Lµ = W ε µνλρFa Fa µ n 32π2 · µν λρ a 1 Large field fluctuations, Fµν ∝ gW− may have g2 Q d3xdt W ε µνλρFa Fa = 0 ≡ 32 2 · µν λρ ' # π Then B B = d3xdt ∂ Bµ =3Q fin− in µ # Likewise L L =Q n, fin− n, in B is violated, B L is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons
    Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons Miguel Escudero Abenza [email protected] Based on arXiv:1810.00880 Phys. Rev. D 99, 035031 (2019) with: Gilly Elor & Ann Nelson BLV19 24-10-2019 DARKHORIZONS The Universe Baryonic Matter 5 % 26 % Dark Matter 69 % Dark Energy Planck 2018 1807.06209 Miguel Escudero (KCL) Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons BLV19 24-10-19 2 SM Prediction: Neutrinos 40 % 60 % Photons Miguel Escudero (KCL) Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons BLV19 24-10-19 3 The Universe Baryonic Matter 5 % 26 % Dark Matter 69 % Dark Energy Planck 2018 1807.06209 Miguel Escudero (KCL) Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons BLV19 24-10-19 4 Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons arXiv:1810.00880 Elor, Escudero & Nelson 1) Baryogenesis and Dark Matter are linked Miguel Escudero (KCL) Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons BLV19 24-10-19 5 Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons arXiv:1810.00880 Elor, Escudero & Nelson 1) Baryogenesis and Dark Matter are linked 2) Baryon asymmetry directly related to B-Meson observables Miguel Escudero (KCL) Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons BLV19 24-10-19 5 Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons arXiv:1810.00880 Elor, Escudero & Nelson 1) Baryogenesis and Dark Matter are linked 2) Baryon asymmetry directly related to B-Meson observables 3) Leads to unique collider signatures Miguel Escudero (KCL) Baryogenesis and DM from B Mesons BLV19 24-10-19 5 Baryogenesis and Dark Matter from B Mesons arXiv:1810.00880 Elor, Escudero & Nelson 1) Baryogenesis and Dark Matter are linked 2) Baryon asymmetry directly
    [Show full text]
  • A Scheme for Radiative CP Violation
    A scheme for radiative CP violation Darwin Chang(1,2,3,4) and Wai-Yee Keung(2,3) (1)Physics Department, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan (2)Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois 60607–7059 (3)High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois 60439–4815 (4)Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Abstract We present a simple model in which CP symmetry is spontaneously broken only after the radiative corrections are taken into account. The model includes two Higgs- arXiv:hep-ph/9409435v1 29 Sep 1994 boson doublets and two right-handed singlet neutrinos which induce the necessary non-hermitian interaction. To evade the Georgi-Pais theorem, some fine-tuning of coupling constants is necessary. However, we show that such fine-tuning is natural in the technical sense as it is protected by symmetry. Some phenomenological consequences are also discussed. PACS numbers: 11.30.Er, 14.80.Er More than thirty years after its experimental discovery, the origin of CP violation still remains very much a mystery. In the widely accepted Standard Model and many other models, CP violation is a result of the complex parameters[1] allowed in the La- grangian. For many physicists, such mundane explanation of the origin of the violation of CP symmetry is not very satisfactory. In an effort to understand it at a deeper level, many different schemes have been conceived in the literature. A popular alternative is to require CP symmetry at the Lagrangian level and allow its nonconservation only in the vacuum. Such scheme are commonly termed spontaneous CP violation[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Search for CP Violation in D 0 → Π Π Π Decays with the Energy Test Arxiv
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-PH-EP-2014-251 LHCb-PAPER-2014-054 14 October 2014 Search for CP violation in D0 ! π−π+π0 decays with the energy test The LHCb collaborationy Abstract A search for time-integrated CP violation in the Cabibbo-suppressed decay D0 ! π−π+π0 is performed using for the first time an unbinned model-independent technique known as the energy test. Using proton-proton collision data, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2:0 fb−1 collected by the p LHCb detector at a centre-of-mass energy of s = 8 TeV, the world's best sensitivity to CP violation in this decay is obtained. The data are found to be consistent with the hypothesis of CP symmetry with a p-value of (2:6 ± 0:5)%. arXiv:1410.4170v2 [hep-ex] 11 Dec 2014 Submitted to Phys. Lett. B c CERN on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, license CC-BY-4.0. yAuthors are listed at the end of this paper. ii 1 Introduction ging of the D mesons is performed through the measurement of the soft pion (πs) charge in the The decay D0 ! π−π+π0 (charge conjugate decays ∗+ 0 + D ! D πs decay. are implied unless stated otherwise) proceeds via a The method exploited in this Letter, called the singly Cabibbo-suppressed c! dud transition with energy test [6, 7], verifies the compatibility of the a possible admixture from a penguin amplitude. observed data with CP symmetry. It is sensitive The interference of these amplitudes may give rise to local CP violation in the Dalitz plot and not to to a violation of the charge-parity symmetry (CP global asymmetries.
    [Show full text]