DOCSLIB.ORG

Aeschylean Drama and the History of Rhetoric

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aeschylean Drama and the History of Rhetoric City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2017 Aeschylean Drama and the History of Rhetoric Allannah K. Karas The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2111 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] ΑESCHYLEAN DRAMA AND THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC by ALLANNAH KRISTIN KARAS A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Classics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 ALLANNAH KRISTIN KARAS All Rights Reserved ii AESCHYLEAN DRAMA AND THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC by Allannah Kristin Karas This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Classics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Dee Clayman Chair of Examining Committee Date Dee Clayman Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Dee Clayman Joel Lidov Lawrence Kowerski Victor Bers (Yale University) THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Aeschylean Drama and the History of Rhetoric by Allannah Kristin Karas Advisor: Professor Dee Clayman This dissertation demonstrates how the playwright Aeschylus contributes to the development of ancient Greek rhetoric through his use and display of πειθώ (often translated “persuasion”) throughout the Oresteia, first performed in 458 BCE. In this drama, Aeschylus specifically displays and develops πειθώ as a theme, a goddess, a central principle of action, and an important concept for his audience to consider. By tracing connections between Aeschylus’ innovations with πειθώ and later fifth and early fourth century conceptions of Greek rhetoric, I argue that Aeschylus plays a more important role in the development of practical principles and concepts of the rhetorical art than has been previously acknowledged. Methodologically, in this dissertation I combine word studies and thematic analysis together with examinations of choral narratives and staging, iconographical research on the goddess Peitho, and a close study of Athena’s speeches to the Erinyes (Eu. 778-891) through the lens of Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Through these diverse modes of analysis, this dissertation validates Aeschylus as a conceptually innovative playwright and offers an approach for further examination of early Greek rhetoric through the portrayal of πειθώ in drama. iv For ALL of my big wonderful family, especially, Grandpa Nick “the Greek” v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend heartfelt thanks, first of all, to Dee Clayman, my advisor, professional mentor, and dissertation committee chair. Her invaluable help, frank advice, and constant encouragement, has helped make the entire dissertation process an opportunity for growth, enrichment, and even joy. I am also grateful to other members of my committee: Joel Lidov, for his genuine interest, keen insights and careful feedback; Victor Bers, for his many, tirelessly detailed notes; and, Lawrence Kowerski, for thought-provoking questions throughout. I also thank the other scholars who have obligingly read and provided comments on early drafts of this dissertation, particularly, David Sansone, Andrew Miller, Victoria Pedrick, and Elias Theodoracopoulos. I am likewise grateful to those who, at meetings for the Society for Classical Studies, the Classical Association of the Atlantic States, Ancient Drama in Performance, and the Classical Association of the Middle West and South, moderated and attended panels where I presented incipient ideas for various chapters of this project. Thank you especially to the faculty, staff, and student community at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, who have helped support my doctoral research. Thank you to Tristan Husby and Melissa Marturano for their companionship throughout the writing process; and very special thanks to Marilyn Mercado for her constant friendship, her ever-positive attitude, and her indispensable practical support to us all in the Program of Classics. I also owe thanks to professors from the University of Dallas and from Magdalen College, David Sweet, Karl Maurer, and Patrick Powers, who fostered in me my first love for the ancient Greek language and the Classical world. vi These acknowledgements would not be complete without my deepest thanks also to the countless friends and family members who have walked beside me throughout the entire dissertation process. To ALL of my lovely friends and family, especially in New York, I owe immense thanks for their constant love, inexhaustible patience, and encouraging presence throughout this adventure. Thanks, in a very special way, to my dear friend Alvaro del Portillo, who has bent over backwards for me countless times over the past number of years. I am grateful also to my wonderful grandparents and to my favorite people in the world—Trevor, Anselm, Olivia, Francesca, Mary, Dominic, Faustina, Athanasius and Avila—for filling my life with nonstop excitement, deep affection, and immense joy. Finally, and most especially, thank you to my dear, loving, and incredibly generous parents, Andrew and Laura Karas, who continually teach me, by their example, what matters most in life. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…..….………………………………………………………………………………iv LIST OF FIGURES….…………………………………………………………………………...ix ABBREVIATIONS….……………………………………………………………………………x PREFACE: Outline of Chapters………………………………………………………………….xi CHAPTER ONE: Greek Rhetoric, Drama, and Πειθώ……………………………………………1 I. Introduction II. Scholarship on the History of Greek Rhetoric III. Πειθώ: A Catalog of Uses Before and After Aeschylus IV. Rhetorical, Civic, Public Peitho: A Fifth Century Phenomenon? CHAPTER TWO: The Goddess Peitho: Personified Aspects of Rhetoric?………………...…...41 I. Introduction II. A New Genealogy and Persona (Ag. 385) III. Peitho’s Companions (Cho. 726) IV. Peitho’s Role and Function (Eu. 885, 970) V. Conclusion CHAPTER THREE: The Centrality of Πειθώ to the Oresteia….......…………..…………….…71 I. Introduction II. Definitions III. The Dramatic Prominence of Πειθώ: Agamemnon, Choephoroi, Eumenides IV. Conclusion CHAPTER FOUR: Πειθώ and Athena’s Rhetoric at Eumenides 778-891……………….……109 I. Introduction II. The Prominence of Athena’s Πειθώ III. The Aristotelian Model IV. Athena’s Work as Deliberative Speech V. Structure and Argument in Athena’s Speech VI. Conclusion CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………144 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………...………………………….146 viii LIST OF FIGURES Fig.1. Peitho and Aphrodite……………………………………………………………………...17 Fragment of a terracotta skyphos by a follower of Douris, c. 490 BCE. MMA 1907. 286.51. Photo from collections of Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Fig. 2. The abduction of Helen…………………………………………………………………..22 Skyphos by Makron, c. 490-480 BCE Boston 13.186. Photo from collections of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Fig. 3. Peitho and Aphrodite Pandemos……………………………..…………………………..26 Triobol coins. c. 510-490 BCE Photo from Seltman 1924, Plate XXII, dd-ee. Fig. 4. Demonassa with Peitho(?) and Eros……………………………………………………...67 Interior of kylix by Meidias. c. 400 BCE. Malibu 82.AE.38. Photo from collections of the J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu. ix ABBREVIATIONS ARV Attic Red-Figure Vase-Painters. 1956. Edited by J.D. Beazley. 2nd ed., Oxford. BA Beazley Archive Database. www.beazley.ox.ac.uk. BM The British Museum, London, United Kingdom. DK Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker.1954. Edited by Herman Diels and Walther Kranz. Berlin. IG Inscriptiones Graecae. 1913. Berolini: De Gruyter. LIMC Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae. 1981. Edited by Hans Christoph Ackermann. Germany: Artemis-Verl. LSJ Liddell, Henry George, and Robert Scott. 1968. A Greek-English Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. MMA The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. PMG Poetae Melici Graeci. 1962. Edited by D.L. Page. Oxford. PMGF Poetarum Melicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. 1991. Edited by Malcolm Davies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. SEG Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum. 1935-. Leiden, UK: Brill Academic Publishers. Snell Pindari Carmina cum Fragmentis. 1987. Edited by Bruno Snell and Herwig Maehler. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner. TLG Thesaurus Linguae Graecae: A Digital Library of Greek Literature. www.tlg.uci.edu. V Sappho et Alcaeus.1971. Edited by Eva-Maria Voigt Hamm. Amsterdam: Athenaeum Polak & Van Gennep. x PREFACE: Outline of Chapters This dissertation examines πειθώ and its connection with the idea and practice of Greek rhetoric in the fifth and early fourth centuries BCE. Specifically, I demonstrate how Aeschylus contributes to the development of rhetoric through his use and display of πειθώ in the Oresteia (458BCE). In this drama, Aeschylus assigns the goddess Peitho new features that will become characteristic of ancient Greek rhetoric; he presents his new ideas of πειθώ as central to the plot movement of the entire trilogy; and, at the culmination of the drama, he stages a work of persuasion framed in terms of πειθώ and in the form of masterful speeches (Eu. 778-891) that seem to anticipate the model of deliberative speech discussed much later in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Chapter One: Greek Rhetoric, Drama, and Πειθώ, provides the scholarly context for my argument: discussions of the history of rhetoric
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Iliad Homer
    The Iliad Homer BOOK I. How Agamemnon and Achilles fell out at the siege of Troy; and Achilles withdrew himself from battle, and won from Zeus a pledge that his wrong should be avenged on Agamemnon and the Achaians. Sing, goddess, the wrath of Achilles Peleus’ son, the ruinous wrath that brought on the Achaians woes innumerable, and hurled down into Hades many strong souls of heroes, and gave their bodies to be a prey to dogs and all winged fowls; and so the counsel of Zeus wrought out its accomplishment from the day when first strife parted Atreides king of men and noble Achilles. Who among the gods set the twain at strife and variance? Apollo, the son of Leto and of Zeus; for he in anger at the king sent a sore plague upon the host, so that the folk began to perish, because Atreides had done dishonour to Chryses the priest. For the priest had come to the Achaians’ fleet ships to win his daughter’s freedom, and brought a ransom beyond telling; and bare in his hands the fillet of Apollo the Far- darter upon a golden staff; and made his prayer unto all the Achaians, and most of all to the two sons of Atreus, orderers of the host; “Ye sons of Atreus and all ye well-greaved Achaians, now may the gods that dwell in the mansions of Olympus grant you to lay waste the city of Priam, and to fare happily homeward; only set ye my dear child free, and accept the ransom in reverence to the son of Zeus, far-darting Apollo.” The Iliad Homer Then all the other Achaians cried assent, to reverence the priest and accept his goodly ransom; yet the thing pleased not the heart of Agamemnon son of Atreus, but he roughly sent him away, and laid stern charge upon him, saying: “Let me not find thee, old man, amid the hollow ships, whether tarrying now or returning again hereafter, lest the staff and fillet of the god avail thee naught.
    [Show full text]
  • Summaries of the Trojan Cycle Search the GML Advanced
    Document belonging to the Greek Mythology Link, a web site created by Carlos Parada, author of Genealogical Guide to Greek Mythology Characters • Places • Topics • Images • Bibliography • PDF Editions About • Copyright © 1997 Carlos Parada and Maicar Förlag. Summaries of the Trojan Cycle Search the GML advanced Sections in this Page Introduction Trojan Cycle: Cypria Iliad (Synopsis) Aethiopis Little Iliad Sack of Ilium Returns Odyssey (Synopsis) Telegony Other works on the Trojan War Bibliography Introduction and Definition of terms The so called Epic Cycle is sometimes referred to with the term Epic Fragments since just fragments is all that remain of them. Some of these fragments contain details about the Theban wars (the war of the SEVEN and that of the EPIGONI), others about the prowesses of Heracles 1 and Theseus, others about the origin of the gods, and still others about events related to the Trojan War. The latter, called Trojan Cycle, narrate events that occurred before the war (Cypria), during the war (Aethiopis, Little Iliad, and Sack of Ilium ), and after the war (Returns, and Telegony). The term epic (derived from Greek épos = word, song) is generally applied to narrative poems which describe the deeds of heroes in war, an astounding process of mutual destruction that periodically and frequently affects mankind. This kind of poetry was composed in early times, being chanted by minstrels during the 'Dark Ages'—before 800 BC—and later written down during the Archaic period— from c. 700 BC). Greek Epic is the earliest surviving form of Greek (and therefore "Western") literature, and precedes lyric poetry, elegy, drama, history, philosophy, mythography, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Pay in Ancient Greece
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) University Studies of the University of Nebraska 5-1942 Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece Clarence A. Forbes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/univstudiespapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Studies of the University of Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece * * * * * CLARENCE A. FORBES UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STUDIES Ma y 1942 STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES NO.2 Note to Cataloger UNDER a new plan the volume number as well as the copy number of the University of Nebraska Studies was discontinued and only the numbering of the subseries carried on, distinguished by the month and the year of pu blica tion. Thus the present paper continues the subseries "Studies in the Humanities" begun with "University of Nebraska Studies, Volume 41, Number 2, August 1941." The other subseries of the University of Nebraska Studies, "Studies in Science and Technology," and "Studies in Social Science," are continued according to the above plan. Publications in all three subseries will be supplied to recipients of the "University Studies" series. Corre­ spondence and orders should be addressed to the Uni­ versity Editor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. University of Nebraska Studies May 1942 TEACHERS' PAY IN ANCIENT GREECE * * * CLARENCE A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    City of Praise: The Politics of Encomium in Classical Athens By Mitchell H. Parks B.A., Grinnell College, 2008 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2014 © Copyright 2014 by Mitchell H. Parks This dissertation by Mitchell H. Parks is accepted in its present form by the Department of Classics as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Adele Scafuro, Adviser Recommended to the Graduate Council Date Johanna Hanink, Reader Date Joseph D. Reed, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii Curriculum Vitae Mitchell H. Parks was born on February 16, 1987, in Kearney, NE, and spent his childhood and adolescence in Selma, CA, Glenside, PA, and Kearney, MO (sic). In 2004 he began studying at Grinnell College in Grinnell, IA, and in 2007 he spent a semester in Greece through the College Year in Athens program. He received his B.A. in Classics with honors in 2008, at which time he was also inducted into Phi Beta Kappa and was awarded the Grinnell Classics Department’s Seneca Prize. During his graduate work at Brown University in Providence, RI, he delivered papers at the annual meetings of the Classical Association of the Middle West and South (2012) and the American Philological Association (2014), and in the summer of 2011 he taught ancient Greek for the Hellenic Education & Research Center program in Thouria, Greece, in addition to attending the British School at Athens epigraphy course.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend
    G RE E K AN D ROMAN M YTH O LOGY AN D H E R O I C LE GEN D By E D I N P ROFES SOR H . ST U G Translated from th e German and edited b y A M D i . A D TT . L tt LI ONEL B RN E , , TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE S Y a l TUD of Greek religion needs no po ogy , and should This mus v n need no bush . all t feel who ha e looked upo the ns ns and n creatio of the art it i pired . But to purify stre gthen admiration by the higher light of knowledge is no work o f ea se . No truth is more vital than the seemi ng paradox whi c h - declares that Greek myths are not nature myths . The ape - is not further removed from the man than is the nature myth from the religious fancy of the Greeks as we meet them in s Greek is and hi tory . The myth the child of the devout lovely imagi nation o f the noble rac e that dwelt around the e e s n s s u s A ga an. Coar e fa ta ie of br ti h forefathers in their Northern homes softened beneath the southern sun into a pure and u and s godly bea ty, thus gave birth to the divine form of n Hellenic religio . M c an c u s m c an s Comparative ythology tea h uch . It hew how god s are born in the mind o f the savage and moulded c nn into his image .
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought
    THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT by MELISSA M. SHEW A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Philosophy and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2008 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation of Approval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Melissa Shew Title: "The Phenomenon of Chance in Ancient Greek Thought" This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department ofPhilosophy by: Peter Warnek, Chairperson, Philosophy John Lysaker, Member, Philosophy Ted Toadvine, Member, Philosophy James Crosswhite, Outside Member, English and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. September 6, 2008 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 An Abstract of the Dissertation of Melissa M. Shew for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy to be taken September 2008 Title: THE PHENOMENON OF CHANCE IN ANCIENT GREEK THOUGHT Approved: Dr. Peter Warnek This dissertation engages three facets of Greek philosophy: 1) the phenomenon of tyche (chance, fortune, happening, or luck) in Aristotle's Physics, Nicomachean Ethics, and Poetics; 2) how tyche infonns Socrates' own philosophical practice in the Platonic dialogues; and 3) how engaging tyche in these Greek texts challenges established interpretations of Greek thought in contemporary scholarship and discussion. I argue that the complex status of tyche in Aristotle's texts, when combined with its appearance in the Platonic dialogues and the framework of Greek myth and poetry (poiesis), underscores the seriousness with which the Greeks consider the role of chance in human life.
    [Show full text]
  • MYTHOLOGY – ALL LEVELS Ohio Junior Classical League – 2012 1
    MYTHOLOGY – ALL LEVELS Ohio Junior Classical League – 2012 1. This son of Zeus was the builder of the palaces on Mt. Olympus and the maker of Achilles’ armor. a. Apollo b. Dionysus c. Hephaestus d. Hermes 2. She was the first wife of Heracles; unfortunately, she was killed by Heracles in a fit of madness. a. Aethra b. Evadne c. Megara d. Penelope 3. He grew up as a fisherman and won fame for himself by slaying Medusa. a. Amphitryon b. Electryon c. Heracles d. Perseus 4. This girl was transformed into a sunflower after she was rejected by the Sun god. a. Arachne b. Clytie c. Leucothoe d. Myrrha 5. According to Hesiod, he was NOT a son of Cronus and Rhea. a. Brontes b. Hades c. Poseidon d. Zeus 6. He chose to die young but with great glory as opposed to dying in old age with no glory. a. Achilles b. Heracles c. Jason d. Perseus 7. This queen of the gods is often depicted as a jealous wife. a. Demeter b. Hera c. Hestia d. Thetis 8. This ruler of the Underworld had the least extra-marital affairs among the three brothers. a. Aeacus b. Hades c. Minos d. Rhadamanthys 9. He imprisoned his daughter because a prophesy said that her son would become his killer. a. Acrisius b. Heracles c. Perseus d. Theseus 10. He fled burning Troy on the shoulder of his son. a. Anchises b. Dardanus c. Laomedon d. Priam 11. He poked his eyes out after learning that he had married his own mother.
    [Show full text]
  • 128 13) It Is to Be Noted That the Theory of These Remarks Is Not Put
    128 13) It is to be noted that the theory of these remarks is not put into practice in the Il.: it is taken for granted that Trojans and Greeks communicate with each other without the help of interpreters. The author of the HomericHymn to Aphrodite, indeed, goes one step further, since he makes Aphrodite (who pretends to be a Phrygian princess) say to the Trojan Anchises: (113-6) On this subject see further: J. Werner, NichtgriechischeSprachen imBewusstsein der antikenGriechen, in: P. Händel, W. Meid (ed.), Festschrift für Robert Muth(Innsbruck 1983), 583-95. THE FIRST SONG OF DEMODOCUS The quarrel of Odysseus and Achilles, about which the Phaeacian singer Demodocus sings at the beginning of a feast being held in Odysseus' honour, is neither attested to by any reliable tradition nor easily explicable from the internal standpoint of the epics'). It is thus not surprising that alongside attempts to discover the tradition to which it should be attributed, it has been argued that the subject of Demodocus' first song was simply invented by Homer. In his article on the Odysseyin RE, P. Von der Mfhll assumed that the quarrel of Odysseus and Achilles was an autoschediasma created with the intention of supplying Demodocus with material for his performance2). Though Von der Mfhll later abandoned this theory in favour of the hypothesis that the episode could be traced back to the Cypria3), the view that Demodocus' first song is an "Augenblickserfindung" was revived by W. Marg. According to Marg's theory, the quarrel between Odysseus and Achilles was invented in order to generate an allusion to the proem of the Iliad, to which it bears a striking resemblance4).
    [Show full text]
  • Homer and Hesiod
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Classical Studies) Classical Studies at Penn 1-1-1997 Homer and Hesiod Ralph M. Rosen University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Rosen, R. M. (1997). Homer and Hesiod. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/7 Postprint version. Published in A New Companion to Homer, edited by Barry Powell and Ian Morris, Mnemosyne: Bibliotheca classica Batava, Supplementum 163 (New York: Brill, 1997), pages 463-488. The author has asserted his right to include this material in ScholarlyCommons@Penn. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Homer and Hesiod Abstract One of the most frustrating aspects of Homeric studies is that so little literary material outside the Homeric corpus itself survives to enhance our understanding of the cultural landscape of the period. Recent scholarship suggests that a large and diverse poetic tradition lay behind the figure we refer to as "Homer," but little of it survives. Indeed we have little continuous written Greek for another century. The one exception is Hesiod, who composed two extant poems, the Theogony and Works and Days, and possibly several others, including the Shield of Heracles and the Catalogue of Women. As we shall see, while Hesiodic poetry was not occupied specifically with heroic themes, it was part of the same formal tradition of epic, sharing with Homer key metrical, dialectal, and dictional features.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period Ryan
    Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period by Ryan Anthony Boehm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil, Chair Professor Erich Gruen Professor Mark Griffith Spring 2011 Copyright © Ryan Anthony Boehm, 2011 ABSTRACT SYNOIKISM, URBANIZATION, AND EMPIRE IN THE EARLY HELLENISTIC PERIOD by Ryan Anthony Boehm Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair This dissertation, entitled “Synoikism, Urbanization, and Empire in the Early Hellenistic Period,” seeks to present a new approach to understanding the dynamic interaction between imperial powers and cities following the Macedonian conquest of Greece and Asia Minor. Rather than constructing a political narrative of the period, I focus on the role of reshaping urban centers and regional landscapes in the creation of empire in Greece and western Asia Minor. This period was marked by the rapid creation of new cities, major settlement and demographic shifts, and the reorganization, consolidation, or destruction of existing settlements and the urbanization of previously under- exploited regions. I analyze the complexities of this phenomenon across four frameworks: shifting settlement patterns, the regional and royal economy, civic religion, and the articulation of a new order in architectural and urban space. The introduction poses the central problem of the interrelationship between urbanization and imperial control and sets out the methodology of my dissertation. After briefly reviewing and critiquing previous approaches to this topic, which have focused mainly on creating catalogues, I point to the gains that can be made by shifting the focus to social and economic structures and asking more specific interpretive questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intertextual Dynamics of Colluthus' Abduction of Helen
    The Intertextual Dynamics of Colluthus’ Abduction of Helen by Geoffrey Harmsworth A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Classical Studies Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2018 © Geoffrey Harmsworth 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any re- quired final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This thesis is devoted to an intertextual study of Colluthus’ late antique epyllion, the Abduction of Helen. Colluthus is a poet whose reputation has long suffered, but is currently under rehabilitation, and the aim of this study is to build on recent scholarship in order to develop a fuller appreciation of Colluthus’ multi- faceted engagement with literary traditions and his allusive technique. Chapters are devoted to linguistic allusion, the intertextuality of genre, and the thematic intertextuality of the abduction narrative. In each chapter, a different approach to allusion and intertextuality reveals a pervasive pattern in Colluthus’ allusive poetics. Colluthus, it will be shown, was a poet who delighted in irony, but it is an irony which is almost always dependent on its relationships to model texts, generic traditions, and thematic motifs. Through the various allusive devices studied here, we find that the poet frequently creates expectations in the learned reader for the directions his narrative will take, only to deny them: he builds a pastoral world through generic parallels, only to leave it behind; he frequently alludes to the motifs and stories of abduction in classical literature, only to frame the “abduction” of Helen as a mutual romantic encounter.
    [Show full text]