DOCSLIB.ORG

Expanded Phase 1A Archaeological Investigation for the Proposed Horseshoe Solar Project, Town of Caledonia, Livingston County, A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expanded Phase 1A Archaeological Investigation for the Proposed Horseshoe Solar Project, Town of Caledonia, Livingston County, A REDACTED EXPANDED PHASE 1A ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED HORSESHOE SOLAR PROJECT, TOWN OF CALEDONIA, Northeast Branch 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, NY 14227 LIVINGSTON COUNTY, AND Tel: (716) 821-1650 Fax: (716) 821-1607 Southeast Branch TOWN OF RUSH, MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK. 2301 Paul Bryant Drive Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 Tel: (205) 556-3096 Fax: (205) 556-1144 NYSHPO# 18PR07941 Mid-South Branch 91 Tillman Street Memphis, TN 38111 Tel: (901) 454-4733 Fax: (901) 454-4736 Corporate Headquarters Prepared for: P.O. Box 20884 Tuscaloosa, AL 35402 INVENERGY Tel: (205) 248-8767 Fax: (205) 248-8739 One South Wacker Drive, Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Prepared by: PANAMERICAN CONSULTANTS, INC. Buffalo Branch Office 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, New York 14227 (716) 821-1650 February 2020 PUBLIC RELEASE COPY EXPANDED PHASE 1A ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED HORSESHOE SOLAR PROJECT, TOWN OF CALEDONIA, LIVINGSTON COUNTY, AND TOWN OF RUSH, MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK NYSHPO# 18PR07941 Prepared for: INVENERGY One South Wacker Drive, Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Prepared by: Robert Hanley, M.A., RPA, Principal Investigator Mark Steinback, M.A., Project Director PANAMERICAN CONSULTANTS, INC. 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, New York 14227-1735 (716) 821-1650 Fax (716) 821-1607 February 2020 Management Summary SHPO Project Review Number: 18PR07941 Involved State and Federal Agencies: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE; Lead Agency), New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), and NYS Department of Public Service (DPS) Phase of Survey: Phase 1A Cultural Resources Investigation Location Information: Location: Minor Civil Division: Town of Caledonia and Town of Rush Counties: Livingston and Monroe Survey Area (Metric & English): The revised and expanded Phase 1A survey area covered in this report comprises approximately 2,768 acres (1,120 hectares). This revised Phase 1A includes the approximately 2,230 acres (902 ha) of buildable area considered in the initial Phase 1A investigation (Hanley and Steinback 2019) and an additional 538 acres (217 ha) to the southwest of the original area, The final construction Area of Potential Effect (APE) has not been determined but will ultimately be limited to a smaller total area confined within the buildable area. USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map: Caledonia, NY 1984 [1950], Rush, NY 1997 [1971]). Phase 1A Archaeological Survey Overview: The setting of the project area is sensitive for precontact period archaeological sites due to its location along the Genesee River at the transition of the Allegheny Plateau and the Ontario Lowlands. Proximity to the river and the access to the diversity of resources from the biomes of two physiographic provinces made this location particularly attractive for visitation and settlement. Evidence of this is reflected in the presence of 43 archaeological sites, eight (8) New York State Museum Areas, and one (1) Rochester Museum of Science area within the buildable APE or within the project’s (APE) or within 500 ft of the APE. These include archaeological sites where human remains have been reportedly found. The history of the project area includes intense occupation during pioneering expansion and the resulting creation of Native American reservations such as the Canawaugus Reservation. A portion of the APE is located within the area of the former reservation. A Phase 1B cultural resources investigation is recommended for the project’s construction APE once the project design is finalized. Although the buildable APE includes approximately 2,768 acres, the ultimate design of the proposed Horseshoe Solar power generating facility will involve a smaller part of the buildable APE. Horseshoe Solar Energy LLC is working with Panamerican and SHPO to create a final project design that will attempt to avoid previously reported archaeological sites. Results of Architectural Survey Panamerican prepared and submitted a separate historic architectural resources survey for a two-mile (visual) project APE for this project (Longiaru and Steinback 2020). Report Author(s): R. Hanley, M. Steinback Date of Report: February 2020 Panamerican Consultants, Inc. ii Horseshoe Solar, Phase 1A Expanded/Revised Table of Contents Management Summary .................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures and Tables ............................................................................................................................. iv List of Photographs ....................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Background Research ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Precontact Period ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Historic Period ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Protohistoric/Contact Period Summary ........................................................................ 9 3.2.2 Historical Context ......................................................................................................... 9 3.2.3 The Canawaugus Reservation ................................................................................... 11 3.2.4 American Occupation ................................................................................................ 16 3.2.5 The Genesee Valley Canal and Right-of-Way. .......................................................... 16 3.2.6 Genesee Oak Trees ................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Archival and Site File Review .................................................................................................. 22 3.3.1 Mortuary Customs. ..................................................................................................... 23 3.4 Historical Map Analysis ........................................................................................................... 25 3.5 Previous Cultural Resources Surveys ..................................................................................... 36 3.6 Archaeological Site File Review .............................................................................................. 36 3.7 Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment for Site Types within the Project Area ...................... 45 3.7.1 Precontact Archaeological Sites ................................................................................. 45 3.7.2 Historic Archaeological Sites ...................................................................................... 45 3.7.3 Burial Sites ................................................................................................................. 48 4.0 Field Reconnaissance ....................................................................................................................... 49 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................. 56 5.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 56 5.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 56 6.0 References ......................................................................................................................................... 57 Panamerican Consultants, Inc. iii Horseshoe Solar, Phase 1A Expanded/Revised List of Figures and Tables FIGURE PAGE 1 Location of the project area in the Towns of Caledonia and Rush, Livingston and Monroe Counties, New York ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Soils within and surrounding the project area ........................................................................................ 5 3 Augustus Porter’s map of the boundaries of the Canawaugus Reservation in 1798 ........................... 13 4 Location of the Canawaugus reservation in 1829 ................................................................................ 13 5 Map of Site #50 Canawaugus drawn by H.C. Follett in 1915 ............................................................... 15 6 Map of the Genesee Valley Canal in the Town of Caledonia, ca. 1855 ............................................... 18 7 Approximate location of the APE in relation to the Genesee Valley Canal and the former Canawaugus reservation on an 1872 map of the Town of Caledonia based on Porter’s 1798 map ......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Low Bridge, Everybody Down' (WITH INDEX)
    “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” Notes & Notions on the Construction & Early Operation of the Erie Canal Chuck Friday Editor and Commentator 2005 “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” 1 Table of Contents TOPIC PAGE Introduction ………………………………………………………………….. 3 The Erie Canal as a Federal Project………………………………………….. 3 New York State Seizes the Initiative………………………………………… 4 Biographical Sketch of Jesse Hawley - Early Erie Canal Advocate…………. 5 Western Terminus for the Erie Canal (Black Rock vs Buffalo)……………… 6 Digging the Ditch……………………………………………………………. 7 Yankee Ingenuity…………………………………………………………….. 10 Eastward to Albany…………………………………………………………… 12 Westward to Lake Erie………………………………………………………… 16 Tying Up Loose Ends………………………………………………………… 20 The Building of a Harbor at Buffalo………………………………………….. 21 Canal Workforce……………………………………………………………… 22 The Irish Worker Story……………………………………………………….. 27 Engineering Characteristics of Canals………………………………………… 29 Early Life on the Canal……………………………………………………….. 33 Winter – The Canal‘sGreatest Impediment……………………………………. 43 Canal Expansion………………………………………………………………. 45 “Low Bridge; Everybody Down!” 2 ―Low Bridge; Everybody Down!‖ Notes & Notions on the Construction & Early Operation of the Erie Canal Initial Resource Book: Dan Murphy, The Erie Canal: The Ditch That Opened A Nation, 2001 Introduction A foolhardy proposal, years of political bickering and partisan infighting, an outrageous $7.5 million price tag (an amount roughly equal to about $4 billion today) – all that for a four foot deep, 40 foot wide ditch connecting Lake Erie in western New York with the Hudson River in Albany. It took 7 years of labor, slowly clawing shovels of earth from the ground in a 363-mile trek across the wilderness of New York State. Through the use of many references, this paper attempts to describe this remarkable construction project. Additionally, it describes the early operation of the canal and its impact on the daily life on or near the canal‘s winding path across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Existing
    Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Part 2 Existing Conditions and Background Information Page 45 Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Existing Conditions Physical Resources Bedrock Geology From Rochester heading south to Cuba and Hinsdale Silurian Akron Dolostone, Cobleskill Limestone and Salina Group Akron dolostone Camillus Shale Vernon Formation Devonian Onondaga Limestone and Tri-states Group Onondaga Limestone Hamilton Group Marcellus Formation Skaneatleles Formation Ludlowville Formation Sonyea Group Cashaqua Shale Genesee Group and Tully Limestone West River Shale West Falls Group Lower Beers Hill West Hill Formation Nunda Formation Java Group Hanover Shale Canadaway Group Machias Formation Conneaut Group Ellicot Formation Page 47 Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Soils As much of the Greenway follows the route of the Rochester Branch of the Pennsylvania Railroad, major expanses of the Greenway Trail are covered with a layer of cinder and/or turf and other man-made fill. In general, the soils underneath the Greenway tend to be gravelly or silty clay loam. The entire trail is fairly level, with the majority of slopes being less than five percent. A complete, narrative description of the soils can be found in Appendix F Natural Resources Flora A complete biological inventory of Greenway property is not presently available (October 2013). However, SUNY Geneseo botany students began to inventory flora within sections of the corridor. The New York State Natural Heritage Program has targeted the GVG for a Natural Heritage inventory in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Past and Present 2-6-03
    PAST AND PRESENT 2/6/2003 NAME/TOWN SUBJECT DATE PAGE # Miner, Fayette Train wreck 10-21-1899 1 Batavia Cash from abroad 10-21-1899 1 Johnston Harvester Company Cash from abroad 10-21-1899 1 Morgan, Capt. William Morgan disapperance 10-21-1899 1 Woodward, T. F. Cousin nominated for Rochester Mayor 10-21-1899 1 Batavia History of Ellicott Street 10-21-1899 1 Bissell, David Jackson Stricken at barber shop 10-21-1899 1 Palmer, Worthington Set record at golf course 1900 3 Hough, A. G. Worthington Palmer beat his record 1900 3 Dauber, Miss Kate Heavy sweet potato 1900 3 Trescott, B. F. Grape harvest 1900 3 Depew, Sen. Chauncey M. Visits Batavia 1900 3 Batavia Produce prices 1900 3 Warner, John Spotted pigeon flocks 1905 3 Batavia Cider price 1905 3 Thornell, Charles F. Sugar beet harvest 1905 3 Perry, Frank D. Sugar beet harvest 1905 3 Torrance, William M. Sugar beet harvest 1905 3 Rumsey, E. D. Sugar beet harvest 1905 3 Corfu Post office breakin 1905 3 Sherwin, Miss Ella Secretary of Socialists 1910 3 Wilber, Rev. William T. Elected chaplain of Hibernians 1910 3 Johnson, Dr. W. D. Purchased Ford from Ralph C. Williams 1910 3 Williams, Ralph C. Sold Ford to Dr. W. D. Johnson 1910 3 Batavia Cold 10-12-1910 3 Alexander Grange purchased church 1910 3 Batavia 1st Baptist Judd Class hunts raccoons 10-13-1910 3 Batavia Chestnut crop light 1910 3 Crafts, Rev. Wilbert Begins antigambling crusade 1910 3 Beecher, Capt. Lina Civil War veteran dies 10-5-1915 3 Haskell Apples blossoming 10-12-1915 3 Verity, Percy E.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Ellicott Papers [Finding Aid]. Library of Congress. [PDF Rendered
    Andrew Ellicott Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2003 Revised 2010 April Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms006045 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm75019679 Prepared by Anita Nolen Revised by Patrick Kerwin Collection Summary Title: Andrew Ellicott Papers Span Dates: 1777-1829 ID No.: MSS19679 Creator: Ellicott, Andrew, 1754-1820 Extent: 925 items ; 7 containers ; 1.1 linear feet ; 2 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Surveyor and mathematician. Correspondence, maps, charts, and reports of astronomical observations chiefly concerning Ellicott's work in surveying the boundary between the United States and Florida under the San Lorenzo Treaty (1795) and also his surveys of the city of Washington, the boundary between Georgia and South Carolina, the town of Presque Isle (later Erie), Pennsylvania, and the boundary between the United States and Canada under the Treaty of Ghent (1814). Other subjects include international politics, Indian affairs, and the Blount conspiracy (1797). Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Blount, William, 1749-1800. Clark, Daniel, 1766-1813--Correspondence. Dunbar, William, 1749-1810--Correspondence. Ellicott, Andrew, 1754-1820. Ellicott, Joseph, 1760-1826--Correspondence.
    [Show full text]
  • Craft Masonry in Genesee & Wyoming County, New York
    Craft Masonry in Genesee & Wyoming County, New York Compiled by R.’.W.’. Gary L. Heinmiller Director, Onondaga & Oswego Masonic Districts Historical Societies (OMDHS) www.omdhs.syracusemasons.com February 2010 Almost all of the land west of the Genesee River, including all of present day Wyoming County, was part of the Holland Land Purchase in 1793 and was sold through the Holland Land Company's office in Batavia, starting in 1801. Genesee County was created by a splitting of Ontario County in 1802. This was much larger than the present Genesee County, however. It was reduced in size in 1806 by creating Allegany County; again in 1808 by creating Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, and Niagara Counties. Niagara County at that time also included the present Erie County. In 1821, portions of Genesee County were combined with portions of Ontario County to create Livingston and Monroe Counties. Genesee County was further reduced in size in 1824 by creating Orleans County. Finally, in 1841, Wyoming County was created from Genesee County. Considering the history of Freemasonry in Genesee County one must keep in mind that through the years many of what originally appeared in Genesee County are now in one of other country which were later organized from it. Please refer to the notes below in red, which indicate such Lodges which were originally in Genesee County and would now be in another county. Lodge Numbers with an asterisk are presently active as of 2004, the most current Proceedings printed by the Grand Lodge of New York, as the compiling of this data. Lodges in blue are or were in Genesee County.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Immigrant Participation in the Construction of the Erie Canal
    ·IRISH IMMIGRANT ST~~:i. PARTICIPATION IN THE. CONSTRUCTION. OF THE · ERIE CANAL B&W Scans ON MICR Fi . -'.~ S·l~-~~ . IRISH IMMIGRANT PARTICIPATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ERIE CANAL by Dr. George J. Svejda DIVISION OF HISTORY OFFICE OF ARCHEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVAT-rmr MAY 19, 1969 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ii I. CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING TO THE IDEA OF BUILDING 1 THE ERIE CANAL II. THE BEGINNING OF THB GREAT WORK 11 III. THE DEMAND FOR FOREIGN LABOR IN AMERICA 15 TV. THE PROGRESS OF THE CANAL CONSTRUCTION AND THE 20 IRISH WORKMEN ON THE ERIE CANAL V. WORKING CONDITIONS ON THE ERIE CANAL 32 VI. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT USED ON THE ERIE CANAL 39 VII. THE FINAL STAGES OF THE CANAL CONSTRUCTION 43 APPENDICES 53 BIBLIOGRAPHY 58 i INTRODUCTION Irish Immigrant Participation in the Construction of the Erie Canal (AMI-H-2, 1966) is a study of the circumstances lead­ ing to the :Ldea of building the Erie Canal, the construction of this great work, and the Irish participation in it. The economic importance of the Nation's rivers and lakes was early realized by many prominent Americans, including George Washington. With the purchase of Louisiana, the United States acquired free and uninterrupted navigation of the Mississippi. The Louisiana Purchase, coupled with the introduction of steam navigationi, accelerated the settlement of the Mississippi Valley and the territory bordering upon the great rivers of the West, r.he Missouri, the Ohio, and the Illinois. A Resolution adopted on February 4, 1808, in the New York House of Assembly called for the appointment of a joint committee of the Senate and the Assembly of the State of New York to explore the possibilities of opening a communication between the tide waters of the Hudson River and Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • National Significance and Historical Context
    2.1 2 National Signifi cance and Historical Context NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OVERVIEW Th e Erie Canal is the most successful and infl uential human-built waterway and one of the most important works of civil engineering and construction in North America. It facilitated and shaped the course of settlement of the North- east, Midwest, and Great Plains, knit together the Atlantic Seaboard with the area west of the Appalachian Mountains, solidifi ed New York City’s place as the young nation’s principal seaport and commercial center, and became a central element forging the national identity. New York’s canal system, including the Erie Canal and its laterals – principally the Champlain, Oswego, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals – opened the interior of the continent. Built through the only low-level gap between the Appalachian Mountain chain and the Adirondack Mountains, the Erie Canal provided one of the principal routes for migration and an economical and reliable means for transporting agricultural products and manufactured goods between the American interior, the eastern seaboard, and Europe. Th e Erie Canal was a heroic feat of early 19th century engineering and construc- tion, and at 363 miles long, more than twice the length of any canal in Europe. Photo: It was without precedent in North America, designed and built through sparsely Postcard image of canal basin in Clinton Square, Syracuse, ca. 1905 settled territory by surveyors, engineers, contractors, and laborers who had to learn much of their craft on the job. Engineers and builders who got their start on New York’s canals went on to construct other canals, railroads, and public water supplies throughout the new nation.
    [Show full text]
  • This Guide Is Designed to Provide Seventh-Grade Social Studies Teachers with Materials Needed to Present Instruction in Reading
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 022 659 RE 001 450 By-Cooper, Minna; And Others DEVELOPMENTAL READING IN SOCIAL STUDIES; WESTWARD EXPANSION AND TRANSPORTATION IN NEW YORK STATE. A GUIDE FOR TEACHERS, GRADE 7, REVISED. Sewanhaka Central High School District Number 2, Nassau County, N.Y. Pub Date 64 Note-44p. EDRS Price MF -W25 HC-$1.84 Descriptors-ABILITY GROUPING, COMPREHENSION DEVELOPMENT, *CONTENT READING, CRITICAL THINKING, *CURRICULUM GUIDES, *DEVELOPMENTAL READING, DIRECTED READING ACTIVITY, *GRADE 7, MAP SKILLS, *SOCIAL STUDIES, STUDY SKILLS, VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT This guide is designed to provide seventh-grade social studies teachers with materials needed to present instruction in reading skills andto teach those facts, concepts, and attitudes which are the aim of social studies education. Entrieson the subject of westward expansion and transportation in New York Stateare arranged by topics, and material within each topic is arranged according to two texts: -Livingin New York" by Flierl and Urell, to be used with modified classes, and 'New York: The Empire State" by Ellis, Frost, and Fink, to be used with honors andaverage classes. The guide presents exercises to promote the development of vocabulary, comprehension, critical thinking, and map skills. Ouestionsare designed to evaluate the student's mastery of these skiNs and of content subject matter. Somequestions are designed to cover coNateral chapters in the two texts andare so identified. (RT) Westward Expansion and Transportation in New York State U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXArLY AS RECEIVEDFROS THE 0 PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIOSS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OFEDUCATION 4144 POSITION OR POLICY.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, Page 1
    Black Creek Watershed - State of The Basin - Final Report, Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE This State of the Basin Report comprises an evaluation of the Black Creek Watershed which is located in New York State in the Counties of Genesee, Monroe, Orleans and Wyoming. The objectives of this report are to: # Characterize the watershed with respect to its unique physical features (topography, geology, vegetation, wildlife, water quality and hydrology) and cultural characteristics (infrastructure, land use, municipal plans and ordinances and demographics); # Identify resources within the watershed that are of value for aesthetic, recreational and/or educational reasons or because they are unique; # Analyze current water quality and quantity conditions to determine existing problems and threats related to land use impacts; and # Identify critical issues facing the watershed. It is intended that this State of the Basin Report be followed by the development of a Black Creek Watershed Plan that will propose methods for improving water quality and mitigating flooding conditions in the watershed and to ensure its long-term health and the sustainability of its resources. 1.2 BACKGROUND 1.2.1 Intermunicipal watershed planning Large watersheds cross municipal boundaries, often making it impossible for any one town or county to conduct comprehensive watershed planning on its own. Towns and villages within counties often work together on watershed planning and counties work with other counties with which it shares a watershed. As part of the planning process, sometimes municipalities enter into intermunicipal agreements (IMA) stating that they will work together to improve and protect water quality in the named watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • David Bates Douglass Papers, Chronological
    David Bates Douglass Papers William L. Clements Library Chronological Inventory The University of Michigan Finding aid: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/clementsead/umich-wcl-M-1390dou?view=text • 1812 March 23. S. H. Cox to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; Newark, [New Jersey]. 4 pages. • 1812 March 23. S. H. Cox to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; Newark, [New Jersey]. 4 pages. • 1813 December 24. Malcom [David Bates Douglass] to Ann E. Ellicott [Ann Eliza Ellicott]; [West Point, New York]. 6 pages. • 1813 December 24. Malcolm [David Bates Douglass] to Ann E. Ellicott [Ann Eliza Ellicott]; West Point, [New York]. 5 pages. • 1813 December 27. Samuel H. Eakin to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; New York, [New York]. 3 pages.* • 1814 January 14. Maria Colden to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; Coldenham, [New York]. 2 pages. • 1814 January 14. Samuel H. Eakin to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; New York, [New York]. 1 page.* • 1814 January 21. Samuel H. Eakin to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; New York, [New York]. 1 page.* • 1814 Januray 24. Samuel H. Eakin to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; New York, [New York]. 2 pages.* • 1814 February 17. Samuel H. Eakin to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; New York, [New York]. 1 page.* • 1814 February 21. E. D. Wood [Eleazer Derby Wood] to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; Albany, [New York]. 3 pages.* • 1814 February 26. Samuel H. Eakin to David B. Douglass [David Bates Douglass]; New York, [New York]. 2 pages.* • 1814 March 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox, ELLICOTT, and EVANS
    BIOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL ACCOUNTS OF THE Fox, ELLICOTT, AND EVANS FAMILIES, AND THE DIFFERENT FAMILIES CONNECTED WITH THEM. COLLECTED AND COMPILED BY CHARLES W. EVANS, BUFFALO, N. Y. BUFFALO: PRESS OF BAKER, JONES & CO. 1882. PREFACE. OME fifty years ago, before I was twenty, I began to collect material Sfor this family history, but with no intention of publishing it, until within five years past. Many of those who originally gave me the infor­ -~iati0u, which I at the time committed to writing, have passed away. I remember them with much pleasure, because I took great interest in their narratives. Among them were my father, mother, grandmother, and aunts, and also more distant relatives, such as l\,f ARTHA ELLICOTT CAREY, and her sister, ELIZABETH ELLICOTT, of Avalon; ELIZABETH ELLICOTT, • wife of GEORGE ELLICOTT, of Ellicott's Mills, Md.; THOMAS ELLICOTT, of Avondale, Pa.; RACHEL T. HEwEs; JOHN ELLICOTT, son of ELIAS; and MARTHA E. TvsoN. I have also had access to several fan1ily records, and to 1nany family letters, particularly those to JOSEPH ELLICOTT, of Batavia, N. Y. Among those now living, to none am I so much indebted as to JOHN H. BLISS, of Erie, Pa. Had it not been for his unwearied patience and perseverance in collecting family statistics, not more than half, and perhaps not more than one-£ ourth, of the names, dates; etc., par­ ticularly those of the youuger branches, could have been obtained. Com­ paratively few, scarcely any, of those to whom he wrote, refused to give the information asked of them, for which they deserve much credit.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Attitudes Towards the Design of UB's Amherst Campus, 1968
    1 “A Rat in a Maze”: Student Attitudes Towards the Design of UB’s Amherst Campus, 1968-1985. Jack Ding 2 Introduction Today at the University at Buffalo (UB), it may not be uncommon for a student to walk into an English class where the subject under discussion for that day concerns Michel Foucault and his idea of the panopticon. Inevitably, there comes a point when midway through the class session, the professor stops his lecture to raise an interesting “fact” about the university – “in case you haven’t heard, the Amherst campus was built to prevent riots” – after which he will then try to uncover some connection between this supposed design rationale to the writings of Foucault in front of a few gaping students. On a less serious note, students might occasionally make comments about that the “ugliness” or “prison-like” aesthetic of the campus.1 Yet, even outsiders have been compelled to comment on the architecture of the campus. One individual, after glancing at the proposed plan for the new campus, scathingly criticized its buildings as one of those “old time grain elevators or rundown ghettos…with hideous lines and unsightly materials…they are incredible examples of mediocrity.2 This paper examines how UB students experienced the development of the Amherst Campus from its conception in the mid-1960s up to 1985. It uncovers the myths that students associated with the campus, their viewpoints on its architectural style and design, and the ways that they tried to influence its development. Such a study is useful not only because it sheds light on student attitudes towards the “establishment” that produced the campus, but also because there has been very little scholarly inquiry on the student experience at UB’s Amherst Campus.
    [Show full text]