Physics of Compact Stars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Physics of Compact Stars Physics of Compact Stars • Crab nebula: Supernova 1054 • Pulsars: rotating neutron stars • Death of a massive star • Pulsars: lab’s of many-particle physics • Equation of state and star structure • Phase diagram of nuclear matter • Rotation and accretion • Cooling of neutron stars • Neutrinos and gamma-ray bursts • Outlook: particle astrophysics David Blaschke - IFT, University of Wroclaw - Winter Semester 2007/08 1 Example: Crab nebula and Supernova 1054 1054 Chinese Astronomers observe ’Guest-Star’ in the vicinity of constellation Taurus – 6times brighter than Venus, red-white light – 1 Month visible during the day, 1 Jahr at evenings – Luminosity ≈ 400 Million Suns – Distance d ∼ 7.000 Lightyears (ly) (when d ≤ 50 ly Life on earth would be extingished) 1731 BEVIS: Telescope observation of the SN remnants 1758 MESSIER: Catalogue of nebulae and star clusters 1844 ROSSE: Name ’Crab nebula’ because of tentacle structure 1939 DUNCAN: extrapolates back the nebula expansion −! Explosion of a point source 766 years ago 1942 BAADE: Star in the nebula center could be related to its origin 1948 Crab nebula one of the brightest radio sources in the sky CHANDRA (BLAU) + HUBBLE (ROT) 1968 BAADE’s star identified as pulsar 2 Pulsars: Rotating Neutron stars 1967 Jocelyne BELL discovers (Nobel prize 1974 for HEWISH) pulsating radio frequency source (pulse in- terval: 1.34 sec; pulse duration: 0.01 sec) Today more than 1700 of such sources are known in the milky way ) PULSARS Pulse frequency extremely stable: ∆T=T ≈ 1 sec/1 million years 1968 Explanation of the phenomenon GOLD as ) RO- TATING NEUTRON STARS, since: – only Rotation explains high precision of pulses – only small objects (R ≈ 10 km) can have so small pulse duations 1969 Discovery of the pulsar in the Crab nebula Connection established: SUPERNOVA - NEUTRON STAR - PULSAR 1968 Discovery of the binary Pulsar PSR 1913+16 by HULSE and TAYLOR (Nobel prize 1993) 3 What happens in a Supernova-Explosion ? Two Szenarios after ceasing of nuclear fusion reactions in the star interior • Supernova Type I (Carbon core): Explosive ’Burning’, star is completely destroyed • Supernova Type II (Iron core): Implosion due to gravitational instability, subsequent shockwave explosion and neutrino emission ) blast of the star envelope, star interior collapses ) NEUTRON STAR or BACK HOLE Neutron star-Properties: • Radius: R ≈ 10 km • Density: ρ ≈ 1014 : : : 1015 g/cm3 30 • Mass: M ≈ M = 2 × 10 kg • Rotation: Period T < 1 sec, for progenitor star T ≈ 30 d (Sun) • Magnetic field: contraction increases the density of field lines dramatically 12 ! H=Hearth ≈ 10 4 Pulsars: Laboratories for Many-particle Physics Glitches: Superfluid Nuclear Matter 1970 1975 1980 11.21 11.208 11.206 Frequenzy f (Hz) 11.204 11.202 0 2000 4000 6000 Julian Date −2440000.5 Nature of Glitches: Vortex-Crust Unpinning ! suddenly smaller momet of inertia ! jump in Ω = dφ/dt (angular momentum conserva- tion) Lecture: Astronomie II online, Notebook University Rostock (NUR) http://www.mpg.uni-rostock.de/tap/astro/ 5 Phase diagram for QCD Matter at high densities Big Bang Quark-Gluon-Plasma 1.5 RHIC, LHC (construction) Challenge to Experiments DECONFINEMENT CERN-SPS FAIR (Project) and Questions to AGS Brookhaven Theory: H Hadron gas [T =140 MeV] [T =140 • How do Quarks get their SIS Darmstadt masses (χSB)? Quark Matter • Why are there no free Quarks QCD - Lattice Gauge Theory Super- Temperature Novae Heavy Ion Collisions and Gluons (Confinement)? CONFINEMENT COLOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY 0.1 Nuclear matter Neutron / Quark Stars -3 1 Baryon Density 3 [n ο =0.16 fm ] Virtual Institute (2003-06): “Dense hadronic matter and QCD phase transitions” (UNIs Bielefeld, Darmstadt, Frankfurt, Giessen, Rostock, Tubingen¨ mit GSI Darmstadt) 6 Equation of State and Stability of Compact Stars Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff Equations 1. Stability: General Relativistic Hydrostatic Equilibrium − dP (r) m(r)"(r) P (r) 4πr3P (r) 2Gm(r) 1 = −G 1 + 1 + 1 − dr r2 "(r) m(r) r NEWTON EINSTEIN CORRECTIONS GENERAL REL. THEORY R 2 2. Mass Distribution: m(R) = 0 "(r) 4π r dr R 2.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 RX J1856 0.4 EXO 0748-676 2.0 causality 4Uconstraint 1636-536 0.3 ] -3 2 10 ] 0.2 sun 1.5 4U 0614 +09 Flow constraint XTE J1739-285 DBHF (Bonn A) M [M 1.0 η η DBHF D = 0.92, V = 0.0 z = 0.1 P [MeV fm η = 0.92, η = 0.0 η η D V D = 1.00, V = 0.5 η η η = 1.02, η = 0.5 D = 1.00, V = 0.5 D V 1 0.5 η η η = 1.03, η = 0.5 D = 1.03, V = 0.5 10 D V η η η η D = 1.00, V = 0.0 D = 1.02, V = 0.5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 8 10 12 14 -3 n [fm ] R [km] 7 N =1.55 N N =1.8 N NB=1.3 NO B O B O 15 R R e R Rotation and Star Structure e e 12 R R p R p H p Axially symmetric solutions of the EINSTEIN- 9 equations for compact stars show:: H r [km] H M • Deformation (Excentricity) 6 M • new density distribution (centrifugal forces) 3 Q Q • further general relativity effects M 0 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 Ω [kHz] Ω [kHz] Ω [kHz] Ω No Stationary Rotating Stars Phase transition to Quark matter depends on 150 88 Mass (Baryon number N) and Angular veloc- Ω 144 ity (Ω = dφ/dt) of the Star! 132 126 66 114 108 102 120 96 90 84 78 72 66 Phase diagram (Ω − N plane) =) 60 visualizes observable Signals: 44 • Braking index (spin-down) 22 • Population-clustering (accretion) Hadronic Stars Quark Core Stars Black Holes Moment of inertia () Phase transition! 0 2 4 6 [kHz] 22 11 1.51.5 N 2.252.25 1.751.75 1.251.251.25 1.5 1.75 2.0 N/N . 8 Low-mass X-ray Binary (LMXB) LMXB’s show: • Accretion (N - Evolution) • X-ray bursts with quasiperiodic Brightness Oscillations (QPO’s) • further general rel. effects (ISCO) 10 1.6 over 100 million years 9 about 60 million years 1.4 8 No Stationary Rotating Stars Phase transition Signal: 1.2 7 N (Ω) ) Population clustering at Ncrit(Ω) crit Ω Ω (N) ( 1.0 6 max max N 5 0.8 {kHz] Hadronic Stars [kHz] QPO-Phenomenon gives informations about: ν Ω 4 0.6 • Mass-radius relation 3 0.6 TG 0.4 Black Holes • 2 1.0 TG Rotation frequency 0.2 1 Quark Core Stars Ω−N plane () Hertzsprung-Russell- 0 0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 Diagram for QPO’s! N [Nsun] 9 Cooling of Compact Stars-Results Cooling of Hybrid stars with 2SC Quark core T =40 MeV T = 0 HJ (Y - 3P *0.1) with K = 240 MeV with Med. effects, our crust, Gaussian FF 2 ν γ e ν e γ γ 1.10 γ 1.214 critical γ γ 1.217 QM γ γ 6.4 ν ν 2SC 1.25 e e ν e Crab 1.32 1.42 γ RX J0822-43 ν γ 1.5 γ e 1.65 1.75 γ 6.2 1E 1207-52 1.793 ν e γ γ RX J0002+62 [K]) s PSR J0205+64 in 3C58 6 PSR 0656+14 log(T PSR 1055-52 Vela Neutrinos carry energy off the star Geminga 5.8 CTA 1 =) Cooling evolution given by j dT (t) γ + j=URCA;::: ν RX J1865-3754 = − 5.6 P i dt i=q,e,γ;::: cV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 P log(t[yr]) - • Enhanced Cooling by URCA ) Signal ν • 2SC+X phase, ∆X ∼ 30 keV e- • Pulsar in 3C58 - candidate for a Quark Star? Grigorian, DB, Voskresensky: Phys. Rev. C 71 d u (2005) 10 Magnetic Quark Star: Neutrino Beam { Gamma-Ray-Burst • Neutrinos trapped in a star when temperature T > 1 MeV (≈ 1010K) ! mean free path R vortex star surface • 2SC quark matter core with magnetic vortices (B∼ 1016 G) superconductor • Beamed emission neutrinos, ∆E ∼ 1052 erg R ν,ν G λ G ν G e + ν • Conversion of neutrinos ! photons: Gamma-Ray Burst (?) γ θ ν ν,ν γ ν e 1e+53 13 B = 10 G conversion 14 1e+52 B = 10 G 15 B = 10 G 1e+51 16 B = 10 G 17 L [erg/s] 1e+50 B = 10 G 30 20 T [MeV] 10 1 0.1 [grad] ν θ 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 t [s] 11 Puzzling Compact Star Phenomena - Quark Star Candidates? Quasiperiodic Brightness Oscillations (QPO’s) in Low-mass X-Ray Binaries (LMXB’s) ) Limits for Mass - Radius - Relation ) 2 M too large mass for quark stars? ( Rossi-XTE LMXB ) Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB), extragalactic, extremely bright, Connection to Supernova Explosions ) Which Engine ∼ 1052 erg ? ( INTEGRAL GRB 990123 ) Isolated X-ray source (RX J18565), 17 km radiation radius ) too big for a Neutron Star? ( HUBBLE RX J1856.5-3754 ) Pulsar in Supernova Remnant (3C58; AD 1181) with Temperature T = 106 K ) too cold for a Neutron Star? ( CHANDRA 3C58 ) 12 Wide variety of supernovas - progenitor mass dependence 13 Supernova Collapse in the Phase Diagram 2 Supernova evolution 10 in the phase diagram [MeV] T Nuclear matter 101 temperature 2SC 100 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 density ρ [g cm-3] 14 Supernova Collapse in the Phase Diagram (II) 2 Supernova evolution 10 in the phase diagram [MeV] T Nuclear matter 101 15 Msun (Harald Dimmelmeier) temperature 2SC 100 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 density ρ [g cm-3] 15 Supernova Collapse in the Phase Diagram 2 40 Msun 10 (Tobias Fischer) [MeV] T 101 15 Msun (Harald Dimmelmeier) temperature 100 108 109 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 density ρ [g cm-3] 16 The case of SN2006gy 17 The case of SN2006gy - a Quarknova ? Light curve: 70 days rise time Discovery: Sept.
Recommended publications
  • Negreiros Lecture II
    General Relativity and Neutron Stars - II Rodrigo Negreiros – UFF - Brazil Outline • Compact Stars • Spherically Symmetric • Rotating Compact Stars • Magnetized Compact Stars References for this lecture Compact Stars • Relativistic stars with inner structure • We need to solve Einstein’s equation for the interior as well as the exterior Compact Stars - Spherical • We begin by writing the following metric • Which leads to the following components of the Riemman curvature tensor Compact Stars - Spherical • The Ricci tensor components are calculated as • Ricci scalar is given by Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we can calculate Einstein’s equation as 휇 • Where we used a perfect fluid as sources ( 푇휈 = 푑푖푎푔(휖, 푃, 푃, 푃)) Compact Stars - Spherical • Einstein’s equation define the space-time curvature • We must also enforce energy-momentum conservation • This implies that • Where the four velocity is given by • After some algebra we get Compact Stars - Spherical • Making use of Euler’s equation we get • Thus • Which we can rewrite as Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we introduce • Which allow us to integrate one of Einstein’s equation, leading to • After some shuffling of Einstein’s equation we can write Summary so far... Metric Energy-Momentum Tensor Einstein’s equation Tolmann-Oppenheimer-Volkoff eq. Relativistic Hydrostatic Equilibrium Mass continuity Stellar structure calculation Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Recapitulando … “Feed” with diferente microscopic models Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Compare predicted properties with Observed data. Rotating Compact Stars • During its evolution, compact stars may acquire high rotational frequencies (possibly up to 500 hz) • Rotation breaks spherical symmetry, increasing the degrees of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Pulsars
    High-energy astrophysics Explore the PUL SAR menagerie Astronomers are discovering many strange properties of compact stellar objects called pulsars. Here’s how they fit together. by Victoria M. Kaspi f you browse through an astronomy book published 25 years ago, you’d likely assume that astronomers understood extremely dense objects called neutron stars fairly well. The spectacular Crab Nebula’s central body has been a “poster child” for these objects for years. This specific neutron star is a pulsar that I rotates roughly 30 times per second, emitting regular appar- ent pulsations in Earth’s direction through a sort of “light- house” effect as the star rotates. While these textbook descriptions aren’t incorrect, research over roughly the past decade has shown that the picture they portray is fundamentally incomplete. Astrono- mers know that the simple scenario where neutron stars are all born “Crab-like” is not true. Experts in the field could not have imagined the variety of neutron stars they’ve recently observed. We’ve found that bizarre objects repre- sent a significant fraction of the neutron star population. With names like magnetars, anomalous X-ray pulsars, soft gamma repeaters, rotating radio transients, and compact Long the pulsar poster child, central objects, these bodies bear properties radically differ- the Crab Nebula’s central object is a fast-spinning neutron star ent from those of the Crab pulsar. Just how large a fraction that emits jets of radiation at its they represent is still hotly debated, but it’s at least 10 per- magnetic axis. Astronomers cent and maybe even the majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars
    Chandra X-Ray Observatory X-Ray Astronomy Field Guide Neutron Stars Ordinary matter, or the stuff we and everything around us is made of, consists largely of empty space. Even a rock is mostly empty space. This is because matter is made of atoms. An atom is a cloud of electrons orbiting around a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons. The nucleus contains more than 99.9 percent of the mass of an atom, yet it has a diameter of only 1/100,000 that of the electron cloud. The electrons themselves take up little space, but the pattern of their orbit defines the size of the atom, which is therefore 99.9999999999999% Chandra Image of Vela Pulsar open space! (NASA/PSU/G.Pavlov et al. What we perceive as painfully solid when we bump against a rock is really a hurly-burly of electrons moving through empty space so fast that we can't see—or feel—the emptiness. What would matter look like if it weren't empty, if we could crush the electron cloud down to the size of the nucleus? Suppose we could generate a force strong enough to crush all the emptiness out of a rock roughly the size of a football stadium. The rock would be squeezed down to the size of a grain of sand and would still weigh 4 million tons! Such extreme forces occur in nature when the central part of a massive star collapses to form a neutron star. The atoms are crushed completely, and the electrons are jammed inside the protons to form a star composed almost entirely of neutrons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Star Newsletter
    THE HOT STAR NEWSLETTER ? An electronic publication dedicated to A, B, O, Of, LBV and Wolf-Rayet stars and related phenomena in galaxies No. 25 December 1996 http://webhead.com/∼sergio/hot/ editor: Philippe Eenens http://www.inaoep.mx/∼eenens/hot/ [email protected] http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/∼hsn/index.html Contents of this Newsletter Abstracts of 6 accepted papers . 1 Abstracts of 2 submitted papers . .4 Abstracts of 3 proceedings papers . 6 Abstract of 1 dissertation thesis . 7 Book .......................................................................8 Meeting .....................................................................8 Accepted Papers The Mass-Loss History of the Symbiotic Nova RR Tel Harry Nussbaumer and Thomas Dumm Institute of Astronomy, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Z¨urich, Switzerland Mass loss in symbiotic novae is of interest to the theory of nova-like events as well as to the question whether symbiotic novae could be precursors of type Ia supernovae. RR Tel began its outburst in 1944. It spent five years in an extended state with no mass-loss before slowly shrinking and increasing its effective temperature. This transition was accompanied by strong mass-loss which decreased after 1960. IUE and HST high resolution spectra from 1978 to 1995 show no trace of mass-loss. Since 1978 the total luminosity has been decreasing at approximately constant effective temperature. During the present outburst the white dwarf in RR Tel will have lost much less matter than it accumulated before outburst. - The 1995 continuum at λ ∼< 1400 is compatible with a hot star of T = 140 000 K, R = 0.105 R , and L = 3700 L . Accepted by Astronomy & Astrophysics Preprints from [email protected] 1 New perceptions on the S Dor phenomenon and the micro variations of five Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs) A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • R-Process Elements from Magnetorotational Hypernovae
    r-Process elements from magnetorotational hypernovae D. Yong1,2*, C. Kobayashi3,2, G. S. Da Costa1,2, M. S. Bessell1, A. Chiti4, A. Frebel4, K. Lind5, A. D. Mackey1,2, T. Nordlander1,2, M. Asplund6, A. R. Casey7,2, A. F. Marino8, S. J. Murphy9,1 & B. P. Schmidt1 1Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia 2ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), Australia 3Centre for Astrophysics Research, Department of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK 4Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 6Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany 7School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia 8Istituto NaZionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi, 5, 50125, Firenze, Italy 9School of Science, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia Neutron-star mergers were recently confirmed as sites of rapid-neutron-capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis1–3. However, in Galactic chemical evolution models, neutron-star mergers alone cannot reproduce the observed element abundance patterns of extremely metal-poor stars, which indicates the existence of other sites of r-process nucleosynthesis4–6. These sites may be investigated by studying the element abundance patterns of chemically primitive stars in the halo of the Milky Way, because these objects retain the nucleosynthetic signatures of the earliest generation of stars7–13.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Astronomy from Darkness to Blazing Glory
    Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory Published by JAS Educational Publications Copyright Pending 2010 JAS Educational Publications All rights reserved. Including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Second Edition Author: Jeffrey Wright Scott Photographs and Diagrams: Credit NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USGS, NOAA, Aames Research Center JAS Educational Publications 2601 Oakdale Road, H2 P.O. Box 197 Modesto California 95355 1-888-586-6252 Website: http://.Introastro.com Printing by Minuteman Press, Berkley, California ISBN 978-0-9827200-0-4 1 Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory The moon Titan is in the forefront with the moon Tethys behind it. These are two of many of Saturn’s moons Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA 2 Introduction to Astronomy Contents in Brief Chapter 1: Astronomy Basics: Pages 1 – 6 Workbook Pages 1 - 2 Chapter 2: Time: Pages 7 - 10 Workbook Pages 3 - 4 Chapter 3: Solar System Overview: Pages 11 - 14 Workbook Pages 5 - 8 Chapter 4: Our Sun: Pages 15 - 20 Workbook Pages 9 - 16 Chapter 5: The Terrestrial Planets: Page 21 - 39 Workbook Pages 17 - 36 Mercury: Pages 22 - 23 Venus: Pages 24 - 25 Earth: Pages 25 - 34 Mars: Pages 34 - 39 Chapter 6: Outer, Dwarf and Exoplanets Pages: 41-54 Workbook Pages 37 - 48 Jupiter: Pages 41 - 42 Saturn: Pages 42 - 44 Uranus: Pages 44 - 45 Neptune: Pages 45 - 46 Dwarf Planets, Plutoids and Exoplanets: Pages 47 -54 3 Chapter 7: The Moons: Pages: 55 - 66 Workbook Pages 49 - 56 Chapter 8: Rocks and Ice:
    [Show full text]
  • Luminous Blue Variables
    Review Luminous Blue Variables Kerstin Weis 1* and Dominik J. Bomans 1,2,3 1 Astronomical Institute, Faculty for Physics and Astronomy, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 2 Department Plasmas with Complex Interactions, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 3 Ruhr Astroparticle and Plasma Physics (RAPP) Center, 44801 Bochum, Germany Received: 29 October 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 29 February 2020 Abstract: Luminous Blue Variables are massive evolved stars, here we introduce this outstanding class of objects. Described are the specific characteristics, the evolutionary state and what they are connected to other phases and types of massive stars. Our current knowledge of LBVs is limited by the fact that in comparison to other stellar classes and phases only a few “true” LBVs are known. This results from the lack of a unique, fast and always reliable identification scheme for LBVs. It literally takes time to get a true classification of a LBV. In addition the short duration of the LBV phase makes it even harder to catch and identify a star as LBV. We summarize here what is known so far, give an overview of the LBV population and the list of LBV host galaxies. LBV are clearly an important and still not fully understood phase in the live of (very) massive stars, especially due to the large and time variable mass loss during the LBV phase. We like to emphasize again the problem how to clearly identify LBV and that there are more than just one type of LBVs: The giant eruption LBVs or h Car analogs and the S Dor cycle LBVs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics About the National Academies
    2020 VISION An Overview of New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics About the National Academies The National Academies—comprising the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council—work together to enlist the nation’s top scientists, engineers, health professionals, and other experts to study specific issues in science, technology, and medicine that underlie many questions of national importance. The results of their deliberations have inspired some of the nation’s most significant and lasting efforts to improve the health, education, and welfare of the United States and have provided independent advice on issues that affect people’s lives worldwide. To learn more about the Academies’ activities, check the website at www.nationalacademies.org. Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America This study was supported by Contract NNX08AN97G between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Contract AST-0743899 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Science Foundation, and Contract DE-FG02-08ER41542 between the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Department of Energy. Support for this study was also provided by the Vesto Slipher Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agencies that provided support for the project. 2020 VISION An Overview of New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics Committee for a Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics ROGER D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun, Yellow Dwarf Star at the Heart of the Solar System NASA.Gov, Adapted by Newsela Staff
    Name: ______________________________ Period: ______ Date: _____________ Article of the Week Directions: Read the following article carefully and annotate. You need to include at least 1 annotation per paragraph. Be sure to include all of the following in your total annotations. Annotation = Marking the Text + A Note of Explanation 1. Great Idea or Point – Write why you think it is a good idea or point – ! 2. Confusing Point or Idea – Write a question to ask that might help you understand – ? 3. Unknown Word or Phrase – Circle the unknown word or phrase, then write what you think it might mean based on context clues or your word knowledge – 4. A Question You Have – Write a question you have about something in the text – ?? 5. Summary – In a few sentences, write a summary of the paragraph, section, or passage – # The sun, yellow dwarf star at the heart of the solar system NASA.gov, adapted by Newsela staff Picture and Caption ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ Paragraph #1 ___________________________ ___________________________ This image shows an enormous eruption of solar material, called a coronal mass ejection, spreading out into space, captured by NASA's Solar Dynamics ___________________________ Observatory on January 8, 2002. Paragraph #2 Para #1 The sun is a hot ball made of glowing gases and is a type ___________________________ of star known as a yellow dwarf. It is at the heart of our solar system. ___________________________ Para #2 The solar system consists of everything that orbits the ___________________________ sun. The sun's gravity holds the solar system together, by keeping everything from planets to bits of dust in its orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev 06/2018 ASTRONOMY EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE the Following
    ASTRONOMY EXAM INFORMATION CREDIT RECOMMENDATIONS This exam was developed to enable schools to award The American Council on Education’s College credit to students for knowledge equivalent to that learned Credit Recommendation Service (ACE CREDIT) by students taking the course. This examination includes has evaluated the DSST test development history of the Science of Astronomy, Astrophysics, process and content of this exam. It has made the Celestial Systems, the Science of Light, Planetary following recommendations: Systems, Nature and Evolution of the Sun and Stars, Galaxies and the Universe. Area or Course Equivalent: Astronomy Level: 3 Lower Level Baccalaureate The exam contains 100 questions to be answered in 2 Amount of Credit: 3 Semester Hours hours. Some of these are pretest questions that will not Minimum Score: 400 be scored. Source: www.acenet.edu Form Codes: SQ500, SR500 EXAM CONTENT OUTLINE The following is an outline of the content areas covered in the examination. The approximate percentage of the examination devoted to each content area is also noted. I. Introduction to the Science of Astronomy – 5% a. Nature and methods of science b. Applications of scientific thinking c. History of early astronomy II. Astrophysics - 15% a. Kepler’s laws and orbits b. Newtonian physics and gravity c. Relativity III. Celestial Systems – 10% a. Celestial motions b. Earth and the Moon c. Seasons, calendar and time keeping IV. The Science of Light – 15% a. The electromagnetic spectrum b. Telescopes and the measurement of light c. Spectroscopy d. Blackbody radiation V. Planetary Systems: Our Solar System and Others– 20% a. Contents of our solar system b.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hole Formation the Collapse of Compact Stellar Objects to Black Holes
    Utrecht University Institute of Theoretical Physics Black Hole Formation The Collapse of Compact Stellar Objects to Black Holes Author: Michiel Bouwhuis [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. Tomislav Prokopec [email protected] February 17, 2009 Theoretical Physics Colloquium Abstract This paper attemps to prove the existence of black holes by combining obser- vational evidence with theoretical findings. First, basic properties of black holes are explained. Then black hole formation is studied. The relativistic hydrostatic equations are derived. For white dwarfs the equation of state and the Chandrasekhar limit M = 1:43M are worked out. An upper bound of M = 3:6M for the mass of any compact object is determined. These results are compared with observational evidence to prove that black holes exist. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Black Holes Basics 5 2.1 The Schwarzschild Metric . 5 2.2 Black Holes . 6 2.3 Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates . 7 2.4 Types of Black Holes . 9 3 Stellar Collapse and Black Hole Formation 11 3.1 Introduction . 11 3.2 Collapse of Dust . 11 3.3 Gravitational Balance . 15 3.4 Equations of Structure . 15 3.5 White Dwarfs . 18 3.6 Neutron Stars . 23 4 Astronomical Black Holes 26 4.1 Stellar-Mass Black Holes . 26 4.2 Supermassive Black Holes . 27 5 Discussion 29 5.1 Black hole alternatives . 29 5.2 Conclusion . 29 2 Chapter 1 Introduction The idea of a object so heavy that even light cannot escape its gravitational well is very old. It was first considered by British amateur astronomer John Michell in 1783.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Death: White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, and Black Holes
    Stellar death: White dwarfs, Neutron stars & Black Holes Content Expectaions What happens when fusion stops? Stars are in balance (hydrostatic equilibrium) by radiation pushing outwards and gravity pulling in What will happen once fusion stops? The core of the star collapses spectacularly, leaving behind a dead star (compact object) What is left depends on the mass of the original star: <8 M⦿: white dwarf 8 M⦿ < M < 20 M⦿: neutron star > 20 M⦿: black hole Forming a white dwarf Powerful wind pushes ejects outer layers of star forming a planetary nebula, and exposing the small, dense core (white dwarf) The core is about the radius of Earth Very hot when formed, but no source of energy – will slowly fade away Prevented from collapsing by degenerate electron gas (stiff as a solid) Planetary nebulae (nothing to do with planets!) THE RING NEBULA Planetary nebulae (nothing to do with planets!) THE CAT’S EYE NEBULA Death of massive stars When the core of a massive star collapses, it can overcome electron degeneracy Huge amount of energy BAADE ZWICKY released - big supernova explosion Neutron star: collapse halted by neutron degeneracy (1934: Baade & Zwicky) Black Hole: star so massive, collapse cannot be halted SN1006 1967: Pulsars discovered! Jocelyn Bell and her supervisor Antony Hewish studying radio signals from quasars Discovered recurrent signal every 1.337 seconds! Nicknamed LGM-1 now called PSR B1919+21 BRIGHTNESS TIME NATURE, FEBRUARY 1968 1967: Pulsars discovered! Beams of radiation from spinning neutron star Like a lighthouse Neutron
    [Show full text]