Inoculation of Mimosa Pudica with Paraburkholderia Phymatum

Microbes Environ. 36(1), 2021 https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jsme2 doi:10.1264/jsme2.ME20153 Inoculation of Mimosa Pudica with Paraburkholderia phymatum Results in Changes to the Rhizoplane Microbial Community Structure Shashini U Welmillage1†, Qian Zhang2†, Virinchipuram S Sreevidya1, Michael J Sadowsky2*, and Prasad Gyaneshwar1* 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA; and 2Department of Soil and Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA (Received December 9, 2020—Accepted January 21, 2021—Published online March 12, 2021) Nitrogen fixing symbiosis between rhizobia and legumes contributes significant amounts of N to agricultural and natural environments. In natural soils, rhizobia compete with indigenous bacterial communities to colonize legume roots, which leads to symbiotic interactions. However, limited information is currently available on the effects of the rhizobial symbiont on the resident microbial community in the legume rhizosphere, rhizoplane, and endosphere, which is partly due to the presence of native nodulating rhizobial strains. In the present study, we used a symbiotic system comprised of Paraburkholderia phymatum and Mimosa pudica to examine the interaction of an inoculant strain with indigenous soil bacteria. The effects of a symbiont inoculation on the native bacterial community was investigated using high throughput sequencing and an analysis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. The results obtained revealed that the inoculation induced significant alterations in the microbial community present in the rhizoplane+endosphere of the roots, with 13 different taxa showing significant changes in abundance. No significant changes were observed in the rhizospheric soil. The relative abundance of P. phymatum significantly increased in the rhizoplane+endosphere of the root, but significant decreased in the rhizospheric soil. While the rhizosphere, rhizoplane, and root endosphere contained a wide diversity of bacteria, the nodules were predominantly colonized by P. phymatum. A network analysis revealed that the operational taxonomic units of Streptomyces and Phycicoccus were positively associated with P. phymatum as potential keystone taxa. Collectively, these results suggest that the success of an inoculated symbiont depends on its ability to colonize the roots in the face of competition by other soil bacteria. A more detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which an inoculated strain colonizes its plant host is crucial for realizing the full potential of microbial inoculants in sustainable agriculture. Key words: Rhizosphere, Nodulation, Inoculation, 16SrDNA Nitrogen-fixing symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia in detail (Oldroyd et al., 2011; Oldroyd, 2013; is a major contributor to the global nitrogen cycle (Sprent Venkateshwaran et al., 2013) and typically start with the and James, 2007). We herein use the word rhizobia to col‐ colonization of and attachment to plant roots (and some‐ lectively refer to all bacteria forming nitrogen-fixing nod‐ times stems) (Poole et al., 2018; Wheatley and Poole, ules on legumes, regardless of taxonomy. In agricultural 2018). However, limited information is currently available systems, these symbiotic relationships have been estimated on the genetic and physiologic traits that are important for to contribute more than 80% of fixed nitrogen (O’Hara, inoculated rhizobia that need to survive and compete with 1998). Rhizobial inoculants are extensively utilized to other soil microbes to reach and colonize legume roots enhance the growth of crop legumes (Deaker et al., 2004; (Poole et al., 2018). Moreover, soil edaphic factors, the Narożna et al., 2015; Parnell et al., 2016). However, in number of indigenous rhizobia, biotic-biotic interactions, many cases, these inoculants fail to increase crop productiv‐ and climate all play critical roles in the success of added ity due to competition by indigenous rhizobia that are more legume inoculants (Triplett and Sadowsky, 1992). A more adapted to the local soil environment (Triplett and detailed understanding of this process is crucial for realizing Sadowsky, 1992). Rhizobial interactions with host legumes the full potential of nitrogen-fixing and plant growth- under axenic laboratory conditions have been characterized promoting microbial inoculants in commercial agriculture. The soil immediately in contact with plant roots (the rhi‐ zosphere) is rich in microbial numbers and diversity, in large * Corresponding authors. part due to the secretion of substantial amounts of carbon, Gyaneshwar Prasad: E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1–414–229–5298; Fax: +1–414–229–3926. nitrogenous compounds, and other nutrients into the rhizo‐ Michael J Sadowsky: E-mail: [email protected]; sphere (Walker et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2009). The major‐ Tel: +1–612–624–2706; Fax: +1–612–625–5780. ity of the thus far characterized legume-nodulating rhizobia † These authors contributed equally to this work. belonging to Alphaproteobacteria are metabolically diverse Citation: Welmillage, S. U., Zhang, Q., Sreevidya, V. S., Sadowsky, and function well as soil saprophytes in the absence of M. J., and Gyaneshwar, P. (2021) Inoculation of Mimosa Pudica with legumes (Poole et al., 2018). In addition to bulk and rhizo‐ Paraburkholderia phymatum Results in Changes to the Rhizoplane sphere soil, other plant compartments and microhabitats Microbial Community Structure. Microbes Environ 36: ME20153. impacted by soil bacteria and inoculants include the rhizo‐ https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME20153 plane and endosphere (Clúa et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019). Article ME20153 Welmillage et al. Due to the presence of resident indigenous rhizobia in with a 14/10-h light/dark cycle. Plants were watered with modified soil, difficulties are associated with introducing superior Jensen’s nitrogen-free medium as needed. In the bacterial com‐ inoculant strains (Yates et al., 2011; Parnell et al., 2016; munity analysis, seedlings were planted in a 1:1 ratio of vermicu‐ lite and the same soil, but in plastic trays with drainage. Each tray Chibeba et al., 2017) and elucidating the fate of the inocu‐ contained forty seedlings, and three trays were inoculated with lated rhizobia using the 16S rRNA sequences typically independently grown P. phymatum MP20-GUS (~108 bacteria per employed in microbial community analyses. Similarly, the tray). Plants were incubated as described above. majority of other molecular methods cannot differentiate between added inoculant strains and the rhizobia already Plant colonization and nodulation present in the resident population. Plant colonization and nodulation were examined as previously described (Gehlot et al., 2013). Briefly, plants were removed from In the last few decades, some strains of Betaproteobacteria the soil mix 14 days after inoculation (DAI), and the roots were within the genera Burkholderia (Paraburkholderia) and visually observed for nodule formation. Roots were stained for Cupriavidus have been identified as symbionts of legumes, GUS activity using X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D- such as Mimosa pudica. While M. pudica and its symbiont glucuronic acid) to confirm the presence of inoculated P. (Paraburkholderia phymatum) are prevalent in South Amer‐ phymatum MP20-GUS. Stained nodules were observed and ica and Asia, they have not yet been reported in the Mid‐ counted using a dissecting microscope. western United States (Gyaneshwar et al., 2011). Soils that Effects of the inoculant on soil and the rhizosphere microbiome lack specific rhizobia provide an opportunity to examine the To examine the effects of the P. phymatum inoculation on the interactions of an inoculant strain with indigenous bacteria bacterial community structure, the rhizosphere and rhizoplane- and investigate root colonization in situ. A more detailed endosphere soil, roots, and nodules were collected 0, 3, 7, and 14 understanding of these interactions and the mechanisms DAI. Ten plants were taken for each time point (Fig. S1). Briefly, involved may provide a means to enhance nodulation and on 0 and 3 DAI, plants were gently removed from the pot, and closely adhering rhizosphere soil was removed with the aid of a subsequently N2 fixation by legumes in their non-native environments. sterile spatula. The roots were then separated from rhizosphere soil and homogenized in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle to In the present study, we used a soil devoid of indigenous obtain rhizoplane plus endosphere samples. Regarding samples M. pudica-nodulating rhizobia to examine host-bacterial collected on 7 and 14 DAI, plants were gently pulled from the pot, interactions in the absence of competition from nodulating and the attached rhizosphere soil was collected by gentle shaking strains. We further utilized this symbiosis to assess changes and the use of forceps. Tightly adherent soil and the roots were in the bacterial community of M. pudica in the rhizosphere, homogenized to obtain rhizoplane samples (this fraction may also rhizoplane, and endosphere upon an inoculation with P. contain endospheric microbiota). Nodules were collected on 14 phymatum. The results obtained showed that while the pop‐ DAI, washed with sterile water, and homogenized. Ground sam‐ ples were used to isolate DNA with the Qiagen® DNeasy Power‐ ulation of P. phymatum increased in the rhizoplane of M. Lyzer® PowerSoil® kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s pudica following the soil inoculation, no significant changes instructions

Load more