Local Survival of Dunlin Wintering in California ’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Local Survival of Dunlin Wintering in California ’ The Condor 99:90&9 I5 B The Cooper Ormthological Society 1997 LOCAL SURVIVAL OF DUNLIN WINTERING IN CALIFORNIA ’ NILS WARNOCK~ Wildlife, Fisheries and ConservationBiology, Universityof California, Davis, CA 95616 and Biology Department,San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182 GARY W. PAGE Point ReyesBird Observatory,4990 ShorelineHwy., StinsonBeach, CA 94970 BRETT K. SANDERCOCK Department of Biological Sciences,Simon Fraser University,Burnaby, BC V5A IS6, Canada Abstract. We estimatedlocal annual survival of 1,051 individually color-bandedDunlin (Calidris alpina) at Bolinas Lagoon, California from 1979 to 1992. Resighting rates for birds banded as adults varied significantly among years, and resighting rates for first-year birds varied by sex and year. No significant differences in local survival rates were found between males and females in any age classes. First-year birds had lower local survival rates than adults. We suspectthat raptor predation accounted for much of this difference and other variation in survival rates. Adult Dunlin had lower local survival rates in the year of capture than in subsequentyears. Variation in resighting of some groups of individuals including transient Dunlin may accountfor some differences. However, capture and release of Dunlin may induce short-term behavioral changesthat increase the risk of depredation by avian predatorswithin the first few days after capture. Key words: D&in, Calidris alpina, local survival, shorebirds,predation, age and sex effects. INTRODUCTION Sandercock and Gratto-Trevor 1997). Away Demographic data are critical for assessingthe from the breeding grounds, where shorebirds status of avian populations (Lande 1988), but spend the majority of their life cycle, quantita- estimating these parameters and identifying fac- tive demographic data are lacking, despite the tors that affect populations usually requires contention that winter mortality limits many mi- long-term studies of marked individuals (Lebre- gratory bird populations (Evans and Pienkowski ton and North 1993). During the breeding sea- 1984, Conway et al. 1995). To understand life- son, a number of parametersincluding fecundity history cycles of birds or predict how variables and survival of adults influences the annual pro- such as habitat loss due to global warming or duction of young, whereas for the nonbreeding human expansion will affect wintering shorebird period, over-winter survival of first-year and populations (Goss-Custard et al. 1994), a better adult birds determines population status. De- understanding of population dynamics during mographic data such as mortality estimates are this winter period is required. the key to life-history theory. However, the rel- Dunlin (Culidris alpina) are one of the most ative importance of mortality during different widespread shorebird speciesin the world. They periods of a birds’ life-history cycle, and its in- have been studied extensively on their breeding fluence on population dynamics, is poorly un- (Holmes 1966, Soikkeli 1967, JGnsson 1991) derstood and difficult to study. and wintering grounds (Ruiz et al. 1989, War- Research on breeding shorebirds has pro- neck et al. 1995). Recent evidence suggeststhat duced a wealth of data on population dynamics Dunlin in Europe and North America are declin- (Ryan et al. 1993, Thompson and Hale 1993, ing (Tucker and Heath 1994, Wamock and Gill 1996), and even though an estimated 76% of ’ ’ Received19 September 1996. Accepted 27 June their total annual mortality is thought to occur 1997. during migration and on the wintering grounds 2 Current address:Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem (Evans 1991), there are no rigorous estimates of Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 3200 SW Jef- ferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, e-mail: survival for Dunlin based on nonbreeding stud- [email protected] ies. LOCAL SURVIVAL OF DUNLIN IN WINTER 907 Traditionally, return rates have been reported U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service band. Dunlin as minimum estimates of survival. Return rates were aged as either first-year birds (< 1 year old) are a composite of three rates: (1) the (true) rate or adults. First-year birds were identified by the of survival, (2) the rate of local site-fidelity, and presence of buffylchestnut-edges on the inner (3) the rate of resighting (or recapturing). New tertials or inner middle wing coverts. In adults, statistical techniques based on mark-recapture these feathershave white edges (Page 1974). We data now allow estimation of (3) the rate of re- measured the length of the exposed culmen to capture @) (Burnham et al. 1987, Lebreton et al. the nearest 0.1 mm, and body mass to the near- 1992). Local survival (4) is the product of rates est gram. Dunlin were sexed as male if their (1) and (2), and as such is an improvement over exposed culmen was I 37.7 mm, female if it return rates as it is a less biased measure of sur- was 2 39.8 mm, and as unknown if it was 37.8- vival (Sandercock and Gratto-Trevor 1997). We 39.7 mm (Page 1974). used these improved mark-recapture analyses to obtain estimates of local survival and resighting RESIGHTING CRITERIA AND EFFORT rates of a color-banded population of Dunlin Resighting data were used to determine whether based on a 1Cyear study along the Pacific Coast a specific bird was present at Bolinas Lagoon in of North America. a given year. We defined marking a bird as the This race, C. a. pacijica, winters along the event in which a Dunlin was initially caught, west coast of North America from southernCan- measured and color-banded. Subsequent recap- ada to Mexico (Warnock and Gill 1996) and ex- ture events of color-banded Dunlin were based hibits strong fidelity to winter sites, including on resightings where the bird was identified in our study site, Bolinas Lagoon, California (War- the field by its unique color-band combination neck et al. 1995). Previous work at this site with a field scope, without physical recapture. demonstrated that first-year Dunlin are more All sightings were recorded as either positive or likely to be depredated by raptors than adult probable. Sightings were recorded as probable birds (Kus et al. 1984). Weather also influences when the observer was not certain of one of the survival rates of shorebirds. In Lapwings (Vu- colors of the band combination. If the observer nellus vanellus) significant variation in adult sur- was unsure of more than one color, the bird was vival rates could be explained by mean winter not recorded. Generally, no more than two ob- soil temperatures and winter rainfall (Peach et servers resighted per year. From 1984 to 1992, al. 1994). Therefore, we tested whether sex, age, the majority of resighting was done by the senior or annual conditions affected the local survival author. Daily effort usually entailed l-5 hr scan- and recapture rates of wintering Dunlin. We also ning Dunlin flocks for color-banded Dunlin. investigated potential capture effects by testing Color bands on Dunlin were small, faded with the null hypothesis that newly banded Dunlin time, and bands were easily misread. In order to had the same local survival rates as returning, reduce resighting error, a bird was not recorded previously banded Dunlin. Testing these hypoth- as being present at Bolinas Lagoon in a given eses elucidated variables influencing local sur- year until it was either physically captured, pos- vival of Dunlin during winter months. The con- itively resighted at least twice, positively re- servation of shorebirds relies on identifying sighted once with at least two probable resight- these factors because the winter period is a par- ings, or recorded at least four times as a prob- ticularly sensitive and poorly understood seg- able resighting. ment of shorebirds’ life-history cycle (Myers et al. 1987). SURVIVAL ANALYSIS Local survival (4) and resighting (p) rates were METHODS estimated in two steps, following protocol out- lined by Lebreton et al. (1992) and Coach et al. STUDY SITE AND CAPTURE TECHNIQUES (1996). Program RELEASE (Burnham et al. Bolinas Lagoon is a 587-ha estuary on the 1987) was used to calculate the goodness-of-fit north-central coast of California. Birds were to a time-dependent model (&, pt or Cormack- captured in mist nets near nocturnal roosts.From Jolly-Seber model). The component statisticsof 1979-1992, 1,051 individuals were uniquely RELEASE are efficient for detecting variation in color-banded, and each bird received a metal capture probabilities of different individuals 908 NILS WARNOCK ET AL. (heterogeneity of capture), whether it is caused mediately following banding with subsequent by trap dependence (Test 2) or transients (Test years. A significant effect of age-class on local 3) (Coach et al. 1996). In calculating the overall survival may indicate age-specific mortality significance of the components of Test 2 (2.Ct rates, but it may also be due to handling effects, and 2.Cm, which deal generally with recapture transiency or heterogeneity of capture. Second, issues) and Test 3 (3SR and 3.Sm, which deal the difference between sexes (or groups) was generally with survival issues; see Coach et al. sometimes constrained to be a constant differ- 1996, Appendix, for fuller description and defi- ence in every year by using an additive model nitions of components), we included only those (sex+t). Comparing an additive and saturated tests where data were sufficient to calculate a x2- model (sex*t) is similar to testing whether the value. In the special case where 3 of the 4 com- interaction term is significant in a two-way ponents (3.Sm, 2.Ct, 2Cm) are nonsignificant, ANOVA. the remaining 3.SR can be used as a goodness- To examine potential effects of handling of-fit test to an age model (&2ac*trpt, Brownie and birds, we looked at the proportion of body mass Robson 1983). that captive Dunlin lost over time by weighing Next, we used program SURGE 4.1 (Pradel some birds immediately upon capture and then and Lebreton 1991) to model local survival and again at the time of release.
Recommended publications
  • Bird Species Check List
    Birds Description Date Location Terns & Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Black Skimmer Sterna caspia Caspian Tern Stema forsteri Forester's Tern Sterna antillarum Least Tern Sterna maxima Royal Tern Gulls Larus philadelphia Bonaparte's Gull Larus marinus Great Black‐backed Gull Larus argentatus Herring Gull Larus atricilla Laughing Gull Larus delawarensis Ring‐billed Gull Boobies & Gannets Morus bassanus Northern Gannet Pelicans Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican Cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus Double‐Crested Cormorant Anhinga Anhinga anhinga Anhinga Loons Gavia immer Common Loon Gavia stellata Red‐throated Loon Grebes PodilymbusPodil ymbus popodicepsdiceps PiPieded‐billbilleded GrebeGrebe Ducks Anas rubripes American Black Duck Anas americana American Wigeon Anas discors Blue‐winged Teal Branta canadensis Canada Goose Mergus merganser Common Merganser Anas strepera Gadwall Aythya marila Greater Scaup Anas crecca Green‐winged Teal Lophodytes cucullatus Hooded Merganser Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Anas fulvigula Mottled Duck Anas clypeata Northern Shoveler Mergus serrator Red‐breasted Merganser Aythya collaris Ring‐Necked Duck Aix sponsa Wood Duck Birds Description Date Location Rails & Northern Jacana Fulica americana American Coot Rallus longirostris Clapper Rail Gallinula chloropus Common Moorhen Rallus elegans King Rail Porzana carolina Sora Long‐legged Waders Nycticorax nycticorax Black‐crowned Night‐Heron Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Plegadis falcinellus Glossy Ibis Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Casmerodius albus Great Egret Butorides
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Survival in a Declining Population of The
    Reproductionand Survivalin a Declining Population of the Southern Dunlin Calidris alpina schinzii Paul Eric J6nsson J6nsson,P.E. 1991.Reproduction and Survival in a DecliningPopulation of theSouthern Dunlin Calidrisalpina schinzii. Wader Study Group Bulletin 61, Supplement: 56-68. Reproductivesuccess and survival was studied in a declining population of theSouthern Dunlin in SW Sk,Sne,SSweden, in 1981-1986.Hatching success was low; on average only 30% of clutches hatched, dueto intense nest-predation from mainly Crows, Foxes and mustelids. Some nests (8%) were also lostby tramplingfrom grazing animals. Within a season,there was no significantdifference in hatchingsuccess between early and late clutches, but the overall annual hatching success was higher in yearswith an early onset of breeding.On average,the Dunlins yearly produced 0.3 - 0.4 hatched young/adult.Fledging success was estimated at36% and survival from fledging tothe age of one year at56%. Adult survival, estimated from rerum rates, averaged 89% in males and 77% in females (83% of thesexes combined). The sex-relateddifference in return-ratesbelieved to reflecta loweractuai survivalrate in females, assuggested bythe male-skewed sex-ratio inthe population. The average life expectancyfor an adult Dunlin is estimated at5.4 years and the mean longevity at7.4 years. Survival tendedto decrease with increasing age (up to 5 yearsafter ringing). The oldest bird recorded in the studywas 17 yearsold. The observed reproductive rate was found to be insufficientto maintaina stablepopulation and unless nest-predation issignificantly reduced, the Dunlin will become extinct in SW Sl•ne within20 to 30 years. PaulE. J6nsson,Dept. of Ecology, Ecology Building, University of Lund, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Schedule and Primary Moult in Dunlins <I>Calidris Alpina</I> Of
    29 Breeding scheduleand primary moult in Dunlins Calidris alpina of the Far East Panel S. Tomkoich Tomkovich,P.S. 1998. Breedingschedule and primarymoult in Dunlins Calidris alpina of the Far East. WaderStudy Group Bull. 85:29-34 On Chukotka,the breedinggrounds of the subspeciessakhalina, the primarymoult of Dunlin Calidrisalpina startsin mid-June,at the beginningof theincubation period, and birds migrate southward from thebeginning of August,when the moultis almostcomplete. On Kamchatka(kistchinski) and Sakhalin(actites), where breeding takes place earlier, primary moult startsin July,in the chick rearing period,or evenlater. Thesedifferences between northern and southern populations are similarto thosefound previously in Alaska (Holmes1971). The timing of theseevents is not strictlyrelated to latitude; it is thoughtthat, with localvariations, latitudinal differencesin datesof breedingand primary moult are brought about through subspecific characteristics. Knowledge of subspecific breedingschedules and primary moult periods can be usedtogether with biometricsto assignFar EasternDunlins to different populationsin the post-breedingperiod. P S. Tomkovich,Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University,Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street 6, Moscow103009, Russia. INTRODUCTION Far East are comparedin this study. Two new subspeciesof Dunlin from the Far East, Calidris alpina kistchinski(Tornkovich 1986) and C.a. actites(Nechaev STUDY AREAS AND METHODS & Tornkovich1987, 1988), were describedrecently, in The main data were collectedduring expeditions
    [Show full text]
  • Peeps and Related Sandpipers Peeps Are a Group of Diminutive Sandpipers That Are Notoriously Hard to Tell Apart
    Peeps and Related Sandpipers Peeps are a group of diminutive sandpipers that are notoriously hard to tell apart. They belong to a subfamily of subarctic and arctic nesting sandpipers known as the Calidridinae (in the sandpiper family, Scolopacidae). During their migrations, when most residents of North America have the opportunity to watch them, mixed flocks of calidridine sandpipers scurry about on mudflats, feeding at the edge of the retreating tide, or swarm aloft, twisting and turning like a dense school of fish. These traits, in a group of birds that look so much alike to start with, give bird watchers nightmares. Fortunately for Alaskans and visitors to our state, Alaska is an excellent location to view and identify calidridine sandpipers. The early summer breeding season is the easiest time of the year to distinguish the various species, not only because they are in breeding plumage and are more approachable than at other times of the year, but also because each species performs a characteristic courtship display with unique vocalizations. For the avid birder, Alaska has the additional attraction of being one of the best places in North America to view exotic Eurasian species. General description: Three peeps are abundant summer residents and breeders in Alaska—the least, semipalmated, and western sandpipers (Calidris minutilla, C. pusilla, and C. mauri) [all lists in order by size]. Another four species from Eurasia may also be seen—the little, rufous-necked, Temminck's, and long-toed stints (“stint” is the British equivalent for peep) (C. minuta, C. ruficollis, C. temminckii, C. subminuta). These seven species range from 5 to 6½ inches (15-17 cm) in length, and weigh from 2/3 to 1½ ounces (17-33 g).
    [Show full text]
  • Shorebirds and Horseshoe Crabs in Jamaica Bay: 2014 Update
    Shorebirds and Horseshoe Crabs in Jamaica Bay: 2014 Update credit: Don Riepe Debra Kriensky, New York City Audubon Harbor Herons Working Group Annual Meeting –Dec. 11‐12, 2014 Photo Credit: coastaloutdooradventures.com Sanderling Ruddy Turnstone Red Knot Shorebird Migration Semipalmated Sandpiper Dunlin http://fossilcollector.wordpress.com/ Photo Credit: marinebio.org www.allposters.com Jamaica Bay JBWR Big Egg Marsh Plumb Beach Dead Horse Bay Bay Dunes Shorebird monitoring sites Horseshoe crab monitoring sites CITIZEN SCIENCE Horseshoe Crab Monitoring 2009‐2014 Average # of HSC Counted per Sampling Night 350 Note: Different sampling methods 300 used at PBW & DHB in 2014 Night 250 Sampling per 200 Plumb Beach Dead Horse Bay Counted 150 Big Egg Marsh HSC Plumb Beach West of # 100 Average 50 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year Plumb Beach June 2012 vs. November 2012 Shorebird Monitoring 2009‐2014 Maximum Count per Species ‐ Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge 3000 2500 American Oystercatcher Black‐bellied Plover 2000 Dunlin Least Sandpiper Red Knot 1500 Ruddy Turnstone Sanderling Semipalmated Plover 1000 Semipalmated Sandpiper Short‐billed Dowitcher White‐rumped Sandpiper 500 Willet 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Shorebird Monitoring 2009‐2014 Maximum Count per Species ‐ Plumb Beach 3500 3000 American Oystercatcher Black‐bellied Plover 2500 Dunlin Least Sandpiper Red Knot 2000 Ruddy Turnstone Sanderling 1500 Semipalmated Plover Semipalmated Sandpiper Short‐billed Dowitcher 1000 White‐rumped Sandpiper Willet 500 TOTAL HSC 0 2009 2010 2011 2012
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • White-Rumped Sandpiper Pectoral Sandpiper Curlew Sandpiper
    White-rumped Sandpiper Vagrant Calidris fuscicollis Native Range: America GB max: 1 Sep NI max: 0 A White-rumped Sandpiper was recorded This species has now been recorded by at Lunda Wick on Shetland in September. WeBS in seven of the last ten autumns. Pectoral Sandpiper Vagrant Calidris melanotos Native Range: America, N Siberia, Australia GB max: 5 Sep NI max: 0 Pectoral Sandpipers were recorded at Reservoir, Castle Lake, Clifford Hill Gravel seven sites in England and two in Scotland, Pits and Cliffe Pools. October records typically all in autumn. After one at comprised singles at Pagham Harbour and Boddam in August, birds were seen in Shapwick Heath NNR, and two together at September at Pulborough Brooks, Balgray Port Meadow in Oxfordshire. Curlew Sandpiper International threshold: 10,000 Calidris ferruginea Great Britain threshold: ? † † All-Ireland threshold: ? GB max: 201 Sep NI max: 5 Oct Curlew Sandpipers are passage migrants to the UK, breeding in central Siberia with the bulk wintering in central and southern Africa. They are scarce here in spring, and numbers in autumn are largely dependent on the summer’s breeding productivity. Autumn passage spanned July to October, with the majority in September when a respectable total of 202 was noted and five sites recorded double-figure counts, the peak of which was a total of 24 across four locations on the North Norfolk Curlew Sandpiper (Tommy Holden) Coast. For inland WeBS counters this species Single wintering birds were noted at represents an exciting find, and five at Farlington Marshes and Thanet Coast prior Nosterfield Gravel Pits and two at Upton to the change of calendar year, and at Warren NR were notable, representing the Thames Estuary in January and February.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Ohio Shores
    Birds of Ohio Shores: Diversity, Ecology and Management of Shorebirds in Ohio Woodlands Stewards Friday Morning Webinar, October 2, 2020 From Plovers to Pipers (who dey): A diversity tour of Ohio Shorebirds 2 Large Plovers: 3 Common Plovers: 4 Uncommon Plovers: 5 Avocet and Black-Necked Stilt 6 Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs 7 Solitary and Spotted Sandpipers 8 Willet and Upland Sandpiper 9 Whimbrel 10 Hudsonian and Marbled Godwits 11 Ruddy Turnstone and Sanderling 12 “Peeps” (= Calidris spp.) Hard to identify; they all look alike and often occur in large flocks. 13 Dublin and Pectoral Sandpiper 14 White-rumped and Baird’s Sandpipers 15 Semi-palmated and Least Sandpipers 16 Stilt and Buff-breasted Sandpipers 17 End of the “peeps” 18 Long and Short-billed Dowitcher 19 American Woodcock and Wilson’s Snipe 20 Wilson’s and Red-necked Phalaropes 21 And if that were not enough! 22 Breeding, juvenile, fall and spring plumages! 23 Prebalternate and prebasic molts (all spp. of shorebirds, not limited to peeps) Feathers wear so plumage changes spring to fall. 24 Shorebird Guilds Body Size Leg Length Bill size and shape Foraging behavior Habitat type (wetland zone) 25 Shorebird Guilds Small gleaners (beach, dry mudflat) Small probers (moist mudflat) Large probers (moist mudflat, shallow water) Large gleaners (shallow water) 26 Shorebird Habitats Meadow/Marsh Deep (er) Water Shallow Water Wet Mudflat Dry Mudflat 27 28 Shorebird Habitats Dry mudflat species: Killdeer Baird’s Sandpiper Buff-breasted Sandpiper Black-bellied Plover Golden Plover 29
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Occurrence of Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris Ferruginea) in British Columbia
    The Status and Occurrence of Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin. Introduction and Distribution The Curlew Sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea) is an elegant species of shorebird that breeds from Taymyr Peninsula in the central Russian Arctic, east along the shorelines of the Arctic Ocean to the coastline of the Chukotka Peninsula in the Russian Far East and has bred in Alaska at Barrow, Oliktok Point and Deadhorse (Hayman et al. 1986, Paulson 2005, O’Brien et al. 2006, West 2008, Brazil 2009). This species is highly migratory with the entire breeding population moving south over a large area of both Europe and Asia to spend the winter from Sub-Sahara Africa, east through coastal regions of India, into Bangladesh, Burma, throughout Southeast Asia and south into Australia and New Zealand (Hayman et al. 1986, Paulson 2005, O’Brien et al. 2006, Brazil 2009). Small groups of birds are also known to winter in Israel, Iraq and occasionally in Western Europe (O’Brien et al. 2006). In North America, the Curlew Sandpiper is a regular vagrant along the Atlantic coast with scattered records for the interior states and Provinces (O’Brien et al. 2006). Along the west coast, the Curlew Sandpiper is a rare species in Alaska where it is considered a casual migrant in the Aleutian Islands and Bering Sea regions as well as the northern regions of the state (West 2008). The Curlew Sandpiper is ever rare in the southeastern regions of the state and is considered accidental in the southern Panhandle region of Alaska (West 2008.) South of Alaska, the Curlew Sandpiper is a rare bird with California having only thirty-three accepted records (Hamilton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdsrussia Report on Shorebird Hunting 2019
    BirdsRussia Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Institute of Geography of Far-eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Science Working Group on Shorebirds of Northern Eurasia Report for the EAAFP, Australian Government and CMS ***** The first approach to assessment of hunting pressure on shorebirds in selected areas of the Kamchatka Peninsula, with special focus on the Far-Eastern Curlew Moscow – Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky 2019 Prepared by Konstantin B. Klokov, Saint-Petersburg State University, [email protected] Yuri N. Gerasimov, Kamchatka Branch of Pacific Institute of Geography FED RAS/BirdsRussia Kamchatka Branch, [email protected], Evgeny E. Syroechkovskiy Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Russian Federation /Birds Russia, Russia. [email protected] With contribution from: Sergey Kharitonov, Russian Bird Ringing Centre IPEE RAN Rus Acad Sci. Anton Ivanov, Working Group on Shorebirds on Northern Eurasia Dmitriy Dorofeev, All-Russian Research Institute for Nature Conservation Photos by authors of the report as well as local residents – hunters, whose names we promise not to mention for the reasons of confidentiality. 2 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Project goal and objectives ................................................................................................................... 5 Materials and methods ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The​​Woodcock
    The Woodcock ANTIOCH​ ​ BIRD CLUB Founded​ ​ 2016 ​ ​ ​ ​ Volume 1 Number 2 November 2017 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Welcome Part 2 ​ ​ ​ ​ Welcome to the second issue of The Woodcock! In this latest edition, the Antioch Bird Club ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ reviews our October events, discusses new resources on campus, introduces our ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ upcoming events for November, and shares recent bird highlights from Antioch’s campus. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ABC Monthly Update ​ ​ ​ ​ Bagels and Birds ​ ​ ​ ​ On Saturday, October 14th, ABC held our 2nd Annual ‘Bagels ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ and Birds’ event. From 8 AM until 12 PM, a total of 15 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ participants stopped by the library to help themselves to some ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ fresh coffee and bagels while watching birds at the ABC ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ feeders across from the library windows. The primary focus of ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ the event was to introduce participants new to the club to its ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ resources while spending a relaxing morning of birding from the ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ comfort of the library’s soft furniture. In total, 18 species were ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ observed, including ​ ​ Ruby-crowned Kinglet, Palm ​ ​ Warbler, and Dark-eyed Junco (the first of the ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ fall season). For the full list of species
    [Show full text]
  • The Calidris Sandpipers Part 2 by Jon L. Dunn
    Los Angeles Birders Presents - Seven Deadly Stints and their Friends: The Calidris Sandpipers Part 2 by Jon L. Dunn – Los Angeles Birders (LAB) is a newly formed non-profit organization with the mission to bring birding, knowledge, and field experience together to encourage, educate, and empower birders. – We are an all-volunteer organization that aims to improve birders' field skills, enhance their understanding of avian biology and to introduce them the latest cutting-edge science and research. – Although our geographic focus is on the greater Los Angeles area, we welcome all birders who share the same passion, regardless of where they may live. – LEARN MORE ABOUT US AT: www.LosAngelesBirders.org – PLEASE TYPE YOUR QUESTIONS INTO THE Q&A, THEY WILL BE ANSWERED AT THE END OF THE WEBINAR. PHOTO BY JO HEINDEL Seven Deadly Stints and their Friends An Introduction to Calidris Sandpipers – Part 2 Jon L. Dunn Larry Sansone photos 20 October 2020 Los Angeles Birders Dunlin Calidris alpina (Linnaeus) 1758 (in Lapponia = Lapland = arctic regions of northern Norway, northern Sweden, northern Finland, and the Kola Peninsula in northwestern Russia in Europe) – Breeds in Holarctic. Ten recognized subspecies, divided into two groups, a smaller mainly European group that breeds from Greenland east to Taimyir, Siberia, Russia (three subspecies) and a larger northern Asian group from Lena River east and North America (seven subspecies). – Winters primarily (mainly coastal regions and north of Equator) from West, Gulf and East Coasts, British Isles and south to West Africa, and east to Arabian Peninsula, Persian Gulf, coastal China and southern Japan. – Common migrant along Pacific Coast and central Great Plains east; rare in eastern Great Basin to western Great Plains, reflecting partly the gap in breeding ranges between pacifica and arcticola with eastern North American hudsonia.
    [Show full text]