Our Streets!: Identity, Institutions, and Privilege in Student Activism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Streets!: Identity, Institutions, and Privilege in Student Activism Syracuse University SURFACE Cultural Foundations of Education - Dissertations & Theses School of Education 5-2013 Whose Streets? Our Streets!: Identity, Institutions, and Privilege in Student Activism Christina Limpert Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/cfe_etd Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Limpert, Christina, "Whose Streets? Our Streets!: Identity, Institutions, and Privilege in Student Activism" (2013). Cultural Foundations of Education - Dissertations & Theses. 55. https://surface.syr.edu/cfe_etd/55 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cultural Foundations of Education - Dissertations & Theses by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This dissertation is a qualitative ethnography of college student activism that examines student activist identity, and the role of social structures and privilege in activism. The study uses data from two years of in-depth fieldwork including over 18 months of participant observation and interviews with 13 key respondents. I took on this research project to better understand how students come to think of themselves as activists, how they speak about and experience activism, how activism—as a cultural text—tells a story about power and privilege, and to explore the role of education in the culture of activism. In this dissertation I argue that student activism is a practice of democratic citizenship that is complicated by the contradictions and complexities of students’ uninterrogated privileges. Mobilizing as a collective, students challenge normative notions of youth and youth subcultures through extracurricular activities and practices that include public and self-education. Activist work includes navigating contradictions granted by identity privilege and serves as a contested space where social inequities and relations of power and privilege are rejected, interrogated, and reinforced. Student activism, as a subculture and a lifestyle, becomes informal schooling for privileged youth offering lessons which bridge the gap between the disconnected realities of school, individual experience, and group work in the “real world.” In this way, activist work and pedagogy provides students with opportunities to engage with the discomfort of privilege. Even as students are confronted with contradictions of their own privileged identities, their political agenda as anti-racist, anti-oppression allies continually push them to better understand their role as privileged actors in a world of injustice. WHOSE STREETS? OUR STREETS!: IDENTITY, INSTITUTIONS, AND PRIVILEGE IN STUDENT ACTIVISM by Christina M. Limpert B.S. Towson University, 1985 M.S. Syracuse University, 1995 C.A.S. Syracuse University, 2001 C.A.S. Syracuse University, 2004 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cultural Foundations of Education in the Graduate School of Syracuse University May 2013 Copyright © Christina M. Limpert, Ph.D., 2013 All Rights Reserved Acknowledgements In grade school, I struggled to read, slanted my cursive the wrong way, and never quite mastered the rhythm of square dance. Yet here I am. I find research, scholarship, and learning exhilarating. Although writing felt very lonely at times, throughout this pursuit a community of extraordinary individuals--without whom this work would not have come full circle—was always within reach. Thank you… To each and every one of the student activists who let me tag along, ask questions, scribble notes, take pictures, and be present in your world. Your enthusiasm and dedication give me hope for the future. Steve Taylor, Thank you for saying yes. Your steady guidance, and your gracious, practical, and intellectual approach to teaching, writing, and research inspire me. Without you, I would have left the fruits of my labor to spoil. I am ever so grateful. Barbara Applebaum and Marj DeVault, Thank you for your thoughtful and comprehensive review of my work and for ushering me, and this project, to the table. Your fierce advocacy for women paved the way for this work to come to life…what an honor. Derek X. Seward and Kelly Chandler-Olcott, Your questions pushed me to think more deeply about this project and certainly strengthened it. Your time and regard meant a great deal. To the many exemplary educators, colleagues, and friends who supported and encouraged me along the way; you gave me a place to explore and shine—what an undeniable gift: Sari Knopp Biklen, Gerald Grant, Lesley Bogad, Ann Clarke, Mary Giehl, Tim Glander, David McGough, Janet Park, Patrick Lawler, George Konder, Fred Montas, and Patricia Schramm. Book sistahs, I cannot imagine life without you. Our suppers reinforce the need in life for trusted confidants, good food, literature, love, laughter, and sisterhood. You are powerful and brilliant. My academic sisterhood: Benette Whitmore McGrath, Glenda Gross, Susan Overton, and Margot Clark. You circled the wagons, provided wise counsel, coffee (and more coffee), keen insight, and sturdy intellectual scaffolding. When I felt unmoored you kept me tethered to reality and facilitated safe passage to the other side. We. Did. It. Huei Hsuan Lin, Thank you for your unwavering support, patience, generosity, sense of humor, and food sharing. You are a sharp and animated thinker and writer, and a courageous, dedicated teacher. Your gift for service taught me to look in my own back yard before tackling the world. Your Ph.Divas made it! Alexandre, You are the love of my life, my center, and my home. You convinced me to hold steady. Thank you for believing in me, and for explaining postmodernism over, and over, and over again. Let’s continue to take road less traveled. iv Quinn, You shine brighter than the full moon over Sandy Pond. You bring color to this too often black and white world. From day one, you brought me joy and pushed me to be my best self. I am so very proud of you. This project is dedicated to my mom, Patricia Ann Quinn Limpert, RN, NP. The daughter of a milkman and IUOE (International Union of Operating Engineers) secretary, my mom was the first in her family to go on to higher education. From you, mom, I learned how to persevere in the face of adversity. You have a wonderful sense of humor (and you get my sense of humor). You lead by example…volunteering still in your 80s. You’re always willing to try something new without reinventing your core self. Thanks for demonstrating the worth of putting one foot in front of the other and for recognizing that stuffing fake kitty hair up my nose was not a good thing. Go SU! v TABLE of CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………….…… iv Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION……………………………………….…………1 Context 2 Why Study Subordinate or Subcultural Youth? 4 Theorizing Student Activism 9 The Influence of Cultural Studies 10 Studying Culture and Identity 12 Student Activism in History 19 The Setting and Participants 23 Outline of the Chapters 25 Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………..… 27 Youth Culture 29 Defining Youth Resistance 31 Social Structures and Identity 35 Distinguishing Youth Formations 36 Status and Privilege 37 Group Life 40 Social Movements 43 The Environmental Movement 45 Conclusion: (Re)imagining Activist Youth 47 Chapter 3: METHODS & METHODOLOGY…………………………..… 50 Introduction 50 Entering the field 51 The Student Organization 52 The Participants 53 Qualitative Research 61 Methods and Data Collection 64 Context 67 Methodology: Framing Research and Writing 68 My Analytic Journey 70 Considerations and Conversations in Participant Observation 73 Relationships and Roles in Participant Observation 74 Proximity and Distance: Ethics and Boundaries in Fieldwork 77 Strangeness and Intimacy 79 Chance Encounters 84 Practices and Portrayals: Writing Experience 87 Struggles and Limitations of the Study 89 Struggles 89 Limitations of the Study 89 vi Chapter 4: “THIS IS WHAT DEMOCRACY LOOKS LIKE:” MAKING SENSE OF STUDENT ACTIVIST IDENTITY………………………… 91 Part One: The Meaning of Activism Change Work 91 A Politicized Identity 95 Extracurricular Education 99 Stewardship 104 Part Two: Making Sense of Activism 107 Identity Markers 108 Mindset v. Action 117 Code Switching 119 Conclusion 122 Chapter 5: GETTING SCHOOLED: THE EDUCATION OF STUDENT ACTIVISTS……………………………………………………… 125 Institutional Lessons 125 Challenging Power 126 Challenging Curricular Authority 130 Allies 131 Access and Equity 132 Social Hierarchies, Belonging, and School 134 Black Sheep: Family and Contested Identity 140 Managing Bureaucracy: Opportunity and Agency 142 Navigating Road Blocks 142 Group Membership 145 Conclusion 149 Chapter 6: IDENTITY PRIVILEGE:HOW ACTIVITIES AND PRACTICES COMPLICATE PRIVILEGE…………………………………… 151 Activist Self Education 152 Activism and Education in a “Laboratory of Privilege” 153 Identity Guilt 156 Benevolent Activism 158 Gendered Work 162 Going Rogue 167 Individualism and Group Practice 171 Attitudes, Action, and Group Work: The Go-Around 173 Conclusion 181 Chapter 7: SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY AND SUGGESTIONS FOR EDUCATIONAL PRATICE……………………………..…… 182 Activism as Informal Education 182 Reframing Representations of Youth Who Resist 183 Seeking Legitimacy: the Schooling Lives of Student Activists 185 vii Experiencing Privilege 186 Implications for Educational Practice and Further Study 186 Peer to peer: Extracurricular work, citizenship, and education 189 References:………………………………………………………………………
Recommended publications
  • White by Law---Haney Lopez (Abridged Version)
    White by Law The Legal Construction of Race Revised and Updated 10th Anniversary Edition Ian Haney Lόpez NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS New York and London (2006) 1│White Lines In its first words on the subject of citizenship, Congress in 1790 restricted naturalization to “white persons.” Though the requirements for naturalization changed frequently thereafter, this racial prerequisite to citizenship endured for over a century and a half, remaining in force until 1952. From the earliest years of this country until just a generation ago, being a “white person” was a condition for acquiring citizenship. Whether one was “white” however, was often no easy question. As immigration reached record highs at the turn of this century, countless people found themselves arguing their racial identity in order to naturalize. From 1907, when the federal government began collecting data on naturalization, until 1920, over one million people gained citizenship under the racially restrictive naturalization laws. Many more sought to naturalize and were rejected. Naturalization rarely involved formal court proceedings and therefore usually generated few if any written records beyond the simple decision. However, a number of cases construing the “white person” prerequisite reached the highest state and federal judicial circles, and two were argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in the early 1920s. These cases produced illuminating published decisions that document the efforts of would-be citizens from around the world to establish their Whiteness at law. Applicants from Hawaii, China, Japan, Burma, and the Philippines, as well as all mixed- race applicants, failed in their arguments. Conversely, courts ruled that applicants from Mexico and Armenia were “white,” but vacillated over the Whiteness of petitioners from Syria, India, and Arabia.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality, Social Locations of Privilege and Conceptions of Women’S Oppression
    Intersectionality, social locations of privilege and conceptions of women’s oppression. By Lee MacLean Assistant Professor, Political Science Carleton University, Ottawa, On Prepared for the CPSA meeting, May 2009, Carleton University Email: [email protected] Please do not quote or cite. If we think of privilege simply as appearing in individuals rather than being in lodged in ways of thinking, we focus on what privilege feeds but not on what sustains it. - Elizabeth Spelman, Inessential Woman. (1988, 4) I am not making a culturalist argument about ethnocentrism, I am trying to uncover how ethnocentric universalism is produced in certain analyses. - Chandra Talpade Mohanty, “Under Western Eyes.”(1993, 55) Feminist theory is in a time of transition and of real promise. Over the past several decades, feminists have articulated a necessary critique of false universalization in feminist theorizing. Feminist generalizations about women misnamed or ignored the 2 experience of too many women, often eliding or crushing out vital information that stemmed from differences of class, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, age and ability. In the wake of this important critique, feminists have begun to forge new tools to help identify and avoid false universalization, tools which will allow for more accurate theorizations of women’s situations, their subordination and the possibilities of their liberation. One such tool is the concept of intersectionality, which holds that forms of oppression interact and modify one another. Another tool is the growing feminist literature on privileged social locations and their epistemological limitations. This paper analyzes the relationship between intersectionality and the sorts of the perceptions and misperceptions of women’s oppression that are facilitated by situations of social group privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring White Privilege Among Adult Learners in the Historically White College and University Classroom
    EXPLORING WHITE PRIVILEGE AMONG ADULT LEARNERS IN THE HISTORICALLY WHITE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CLASSROOM by LINDA ELAINE LOGAN (Under the direction of RONALD M. CERVERO) ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to understand how adult learners experience white privilege in higher education classrooms. There were two research questions guiding this study: (1) how does the social position of adult learners affect their experience of white privilege in the classroom; and (2) what are the manifestations of white privilege in the classroom. This was a qualitative case study conducted during the spring 2002 semester at a historically White university. The cases consisted of two higher education classrooms. Twelve racially diverse adult learners and two instructors participated in the study. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The study found that race, class, and gender affected how adult learners experienced white privilege in the classroom. First, White racialness privileged White adult learners and non-White racialness burdened adult learners of color in the classroom. Class was found to be empowering only to White adult learners who could claim higher social locations. When class intersected with race, White adult learners at the lower end of class claimed power from Whiteness. Adult learners of color from higher and lower social class locations drew on their class backgrounds to negotiate issues of race that operated in the classroom. A higher social class location was of no benefit in the classroom for non-White adult learners who could claim that status. The study found male gender and African American racialness of one of the instructors to be intimidating only among his White students in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Privilege and International Volunteering
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR Scholars Week 2015 - Poster Presentations May 15th, 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM Social Privilege and International Volunteering Stephanie Sisson Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/scholwk Part of the Communication Commons, and the Higher Education Commons Sisson, Stephanie, "Social Privilege and International Volunteering" (2015). Scholars Week. 29. https://cedar.wwu.edu/scholwk/2015/Day_two/29 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Events at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholars Week by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Social Privilege and International Volunteerism By: Stephanie Sisson Advisor: Dr. Ee Lin Lee Intercultural Communication Definitions Theory, Method & Data Social Privilege: Conferred dominance and unearned advantage due to personal identities Analysis (McIntosh, 1988) Oppression: The actions of imposition and deprivation that allow social privilege to exist Ten semi-structured face-to-face Intersectionality: All identities reify each other and are non-hierarchal in significance interviews (Total running time: 11hrs. 15min.) - Institutionalized Social Privilege: Societal systems that create disparities in access to Participants: International service material, goods, and power learning students traveling to - Self-Mediated Social Privilege: The active oppression of others that is believed to be Cambodia
    [Show full text]
  • Awareness of Privilege and Oppression Scale-2: Construction and Initial Validation
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Educational, School, Educational, School, and Counseling and Counseling Psychology Psychology 2014 AWARENESS OF PRIVILEGE AND OPPRESSION SCALE-2: CONSTRUCTION AND INITIAL VALIDATION Michael J. McClellan University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McClellan, Michael J., "AWARENESS OF PRIVILEGE AND OPPRESSION SCALE-2: CONSTRUCTION AND INITIAL VALIDATION" (2014). Theses and Dissertations--Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology. 22. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_etds/22 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Preprint
    Running head: SOCIAL PRIVILEGE Invisibility of Social Privilege to Those Who Have It Kaidi Wu1* and David Dunning1* Affiliations: 1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48109. *Correspondence to: [email protected] or [email protected]. Classification: Social Science SOCIAL PRIVILEGE 2 Abstract The U.S. faces deep social divides, with socially dominant and subordinate groups clashing over how much privilege the former enjoys and how much hardship the latter endures. These differences arise in part because privilege is invisible to those who have it. Dominant groups are hypocognitive of privilege, having more fragmentary and impoverished cognitive representations of what the concept is, relative to subordinate group members. Across 13 studies, this difference revealed itself in impaired performance on cognitive tasks involving privilege. Relative to those from subordinate groups (women, Black and Asian Americans, left-handers), dominant group members (men, White Americans, right-handers) needed more information about everyday behavior to recognize themes of discrimination, generated fewer examples of discrimination, and remembered fewer discriminatory instances from a questionnaire or videotaped talk. They also categorized instances of discrimination on a reaction time task more slowly. These cognitive performance deficits predicted group differences in beliefs about whether privilege and discrimination exist. Performance differences persisted whether privilege was framed as the absence of disadvantages or presence of advantages and whether discrimination was made salient or not. After watching a transgender woman describe discrimination experienced as a woman, both men and women showed increased awareness of male privilege and gender discrimination. Findings suggest that the invisibility of one’s privilege need not solely reflect identity-defensive motivations, but may also stem from cognitive deficits in conceptual knowledge about privilege and discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • TERMS and DEFINITIONS Prejudice +
    Handout #6 On Behalf of Our Children Wisconsin Council of Churches TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Stereotype A fixed over-generalized belief about a particular group or class of people. Prejudice A preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience. A set of negative beliefs, generalized about a whole group of people. Privilege The dominant group has greater access or availability to resources because of particular characteristics. The dominant group’s way of thinking and living is seen as the norm against which all others are compared. Life is structured around those norms for the benefit of the dominant group, e.g., airplane seats and seatbelts are standard size; school classes are taught at a predetermined level, etc. White Privilege A right, advantage, or immunity granted to or enjoyed by while persons beyond the common advantage of all others; an exemption in many particular bases from certain burdens or liabilities. Discrimination The unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people. Racism Individual and institutional discriminatory actions from a combination of prejudice, privilege and power. To exact racism, one must have social power/privilege to (further) marginalize an individual or a group without that social privilege/power. This then becomes a system of institutional and systemic oppression. Social Power Access and availability to resources which enhance one’s chances of getting what one wants and influencing others. Cultural and institutional standards are defined by those with greater social power (the dominant group). Oppression A system that locks the social power of groups into place. The dominant group controls the institutions that govern life—— education, employment, legal system, government, housing, etc.; and the cultural standards-—language, holidays, beauty, values, time, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Racism and Community Building
    THE ASPEN INSTITUTE ROUNDTABLE ON COMMUNITY CHANGE STRUCTURAL RACISM AND COMMUNITY BUILDING JUNE 2004 1 Introduction 1 Authors and Acknowledgments 3 The Significance of Race to Poverty and Disadvantage 8 The Meaning of Race 11 Structural Racism 13 The Context: The Dominant Consensus on Race 15 White Privilege: The Legacy and Enduring Power of Our Racial History 18 National Values 20 Contemporary Culture 23 The Current Manifestations: Social and Institutional Dynamics 24 Processes That Maintain Racial Hierarchies 27 Racialized Public Policies and Institutional Practices 33 Implications and Conclusions 35 What Does a Structural Racism Perspective Imply for Community Building and Related Social Justice Work? 42 Conclusion 44 Structural Racism and Community Building: Frequently Asked Questions THE ASPEN INSTITUTE ROUNDTABLE ON COMMUNITY CHANGE STRUCTURAL RACISM AND COMMUNITY BUILDING JUNE 2004 Extended Uses The Aspen Institute encourages the use of this document. Reproductions in whole or in part are allowable without permission provided appropriate references are given. To Order Additional copies of Structural Racism and Community Building can be obtained from: The Aspen Institute Fulfillment Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: 410-820-5338 Fax: 410-827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2004 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle Washington, D.C. 20036-1133 Published in the United States of America in 2004 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN # 0-89843-415-7 Pub. No.: 04/063 Suggested citation: Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change. 2004. “Structural Racism and Community Building.” Keith Lawrence, Stacey Sutton, Anne Kubisch, Gretchen Susi and Karen Fulbright-Anderson, authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor/Working-Class College Students’ Challenges and Resiliency Factors Scale
    The Poor/Working-Class College Students’ Challenges and Resiliency Factors Scale: Developing the P/W-CRF Rebecca Reed Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Rebecca Reed All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Poor/Working-Class College Students’ Challenges and Resiliency Factors Scale: Developing the P/W-CRF Rebecca Reed Social class encompasses the preferences, lifestyles, and behaviors of people in various social class groups in conjunction with the structural privileges that accompany certain social locations (Smith, 2010). Class-privileged college students typically come to campus with greater amounts of cultural capital (Bourdieu, 1980) that afford them the luxury of understanding how to navigate the middle-class environment of college (Tett, 2000). Students from poor/working- class backgrounds are, on the other hand, often without the benefit of knowing the behavioral codes and expectations of college, which can lead to negative psychological outcomes in the form of lowered self-esteem, depression, and stress. As a construct, resiliency provides a framework for understanding how some poor/working-class students are able to succeed despite these potential negative outcomes and persist through college. The study aimed to measure the class-related challenges and resiliency factors that correspond to different levels of psychological outcomes using a scale called the Poor/Working-Class Challenge and Resiliency Factor Scale (P/W-CRF). Data was collected using a sample of 253 four-year college students who identified as coming from a poor/working-class background.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Cultural Competency Conference Thursday, February 23, 2017
    2017 Cultural Competency Conference Thursday, February 23, 2017 Welcome Conference Overview and Engaging Effectively Topic 1: Cultural Competence o Understanding common vocabulary o Critical social justice o Privilege and oppression o Identity Table discussion: Identity development activity o Facilitated discussion Break Topic 2: Unconscious Bias o Understanding unconscious bias o Microaggressions Table discussion: Case studies Large group debrief Actions steps Closing Resource tables 2017 Cultural Competency Conference: Exploring concepts of privilege, oppression and identity OBJECTIVES: Differentiate between diversity, multicultural, cultural competency, & social justice Describe your personal identities and identify biases Apply strategies for creating an inclusive environment within your unit/department at KU NOTES: White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh “I was taught to see racism only in individual acts of meanness, not in invisible systems conferring dominance on my group” DAILY EFFECTS OF WHITE PRIVILEGE I decided to try to work on myself at least by identifying some of the daily effects of white privilege in my life. I have chosen those conditions that I think in my case attach somewhat more to skin-color privilege than to class, religion, ethnic status, or geographic location, though of course all these other factors are intricately intertwined. As far as I can tell, my African American coworkers, friends, and acquaintances with whom I come into daily or frequent contact in this particular time, place and time of work cannot count on most of these conditions. 1. I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of 12. I can go into a music shop and count on fi nding the my race most of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Class, Status, Poverty, and Capital: a Guide to Social Stratification in Career Counseling
    Portland State University PDXScholar Counselor Education Faculty Publications and Presentations Counselor Education 7-2013 Class, Status, Poverty, and Capital: A Guide to Social Stratification in Career Counseling Tina M. Anctil Peterman Portland State University, [email protected] Brian Hutchison University of Missouri - St Louis Carol Klose Smith University of Iowa Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/coun_fac Part of the Student Counseling and Personnel Services Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Anctil Peterman, Tina M.; Hutchison, Brian; and Smith, Carol Klose, "Class, Status, Poverty, and Capital: A Guide to Social Stratification in Career Counseling" (2013). Counselor Education Faculty Publications and Presentations. 16. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/coun_fac/16 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Counselor Education Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Class, Status, Poverty, And Capital: A Guide To Social Stratification In Career Counseling Tina Anctil, Ph.D., Portland State University Brian Hutchison, Ph.D., University of Missouri--St . Louis Carol Klose Smith, Ph.D., University of Iowa Nation Career Development Association: Boston, MA Social Class Mad Libs I grew up in a _________ class neighborhood. I knew this because the important adults in my life worked such jobs as __________, ___________, and ___________. I knew growing up that there were people from other classes. One time I remember is when ___________. This made me realize that my class and their class afforded us different outlooks and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Rarely Discussed but Always Present': Exploring Therapists' Accounts of Social Class in Therapy Charlotte Mcevoy
    ‘Rarely discussed but always present’: Exploring therapists’ accounts of social class in therapy Charlotte McEvoy Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of the West of England, Bristol for the Degree of Professional Doctorate in Counselling Psychology Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England November 2019 Word count 40,043 (excluding references and appendices) 1 2 Contents Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………6 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………….......7 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………….…8 An anecdote from practice…………………………………………………………………………..8 Theorising class in the social sciences…………………………………………………………9 Defining social class in sociology………………………………………………………...11 Official definitions of class……………………………………………………………….…12 The ‘cultural turn’ in defining class……………………………………………………..14 Feminist critiques of structural theories of class………………………………….18 Social class and socio-economic status in the UK…………………………………19 Class, mental health and therapy…………………………………………………………….…20 The relationship between social class and socio-economic status and health and wellbeing…………………………………………………………………….…….20 Class is neglected in counselling psychology in the UK………………………....23 Research on clients’ experiences of class differences in therapy…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25 Therapists’ perspectives, and classism in psychology, counselling and psychotherapy……………………………………………………………………………………26 What can we learn from discussions of race and racism in
    [Show full text]