DOCSLIB.ORG

The Monitoring and Assessment of Six EU Habitats Directive Annex I Marine Habitats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Monitoring and Assessment of Six EU Habitats Directive Annex I Marine Habitats ISSN 1393 – 6670 N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE THE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF SIX EU HABITATS DIRECTIVE ANNEX I MARINE HABITATS Louise Scally, Nick Pfeiffer and Elizabeth Hewitt I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 118 National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) commissions a range of reports from external contractors to provide scientific evidence and advice to assist it in its duties. The Irish Wildlife Manuals series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by NPWS, and is one means by which it disseminates scientific information. Others include scientific publications in peer reviewed journals. The views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of NPWS and should, therefore, not be attributed to NPWS. Front cover, small photographs from top row: Coastal heath, Howth Head, Co. Dublin, Maurice Eakin; Red Squirrel Sciurus vulgaris, Eddie Dunne, NPWS Image Library; Marsh Fritillary Euphydryas aurinia, Brian Nelson; Puffin Fratercula arctica, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; Long Range and Upper Lake, Killarney National Park, NPWS Image Library; Limestone pavement, Bricklieve Mountains, Co. Sligo, Andy Bleasdale; Meadow Saffron Colchicum autumnale, Lorcan Scott; Barn Owl Tyto alba, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; A deep water fly trap anemone Phelliactis sp., Yvonne Leahy; Violet Crystalwort Riccia huebeneriana, Robert Thompson Main photograph: A Kelp park, Nick Pfeiffer The monitoring and assessment of six EU Habitats Directive Annex I Marine Habitats Louise Scally, Nick Pfeiffer and Elizabeth Hewitt Citation: Scally, L., Pfeiffer, N. and Hewitt, E. (2020) The monitoring and assessment of six EU Habitats Directive Annex I Marine Habitats. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 118. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Keywords: Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time, Estuaries, Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide, Large shallow inlets and bays, Reefs, Submerged or partially submerged sea caves. The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Yvonne Leahy; [email protected] This IWM was edited by Yvonne Leahy, Cliona O’Brien and Áine O Connor ISSN 1393 – 6670 An tSeirbhís Páirceanna Náisiúnta agus Fiadhúlra 2020 National Parks and Wildlife Service 2020 An Roinn Cultúir, Oidhreachta agus Gaeltachta, 90 Sráid an Rí Thuaidh, Margadh na Feirme, Baile Átha Cliath 7, D07N7CV Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, 90 North King Street, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 N7CV Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Field Survey methods ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Subtidal sediments ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Intertidal sediments ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.2.3 Keystone Communities .................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.4 Littoral hard substratum (Intertidal reef) .................................................................................. 13 2.2.5 Sublittoral hard substratum (Subtidal reef) .............................................................................. 15 2.2.6 Submerged or Partially Submerged Sea Caves [8830] .................................................................... 15 2.3 Data analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Data manipulation and transformations ................................................................................... 17 3 Conservation Assessment.......................................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Range ................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Area ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3 Structure & functions .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.4 Future prospects .................................................................................................................................. 20 3.5 Overall site assessment..................................................................................................................... 21 4 Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time [1110] .............................................. 22 4.2 Estuaries [1130] ................................................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide [1140] .................................................... 26 4.4 Large shallow inlets and bays [1160] ................................................................................................... 28 4.5 Reefs [1170] ......................................................................................................................................... 31 4.6 Submerged or partially submerged sea caves [8330] ........................................................................... 34 5 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time [1110] .............................................. 36 5.2 Estuaries [1130] ................................................................................................................................... 36 5.3 Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide [1140] .................................................... 37 5.4 Large shallow inlets and bays [1160] ................................................................................................... 37 5.5 Reefs [1170] .......................................................................................................................................... 39 5.6 Submerged or partially submerged sea caves [8330] ............................................................................ 40 5.7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................... 40 6 References ................................................................................................................................................... 41 Appendix 1 Sediment Marine Community Types sampled within each SAC ...................................... 44 Appendix 2 Reef Marine Community Types sampled within each SAC ............................................... 48 IWM 118 (2020) Monitoring and Assessment of Annex I Marine Habitats Executive Summary This report presents details of a monitoring survey to assess the conservation status of six marine Annex I habitats conducted between 2016 and 2018. This included Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time [1110], Estuaries [1130], Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide [1140], Large shallow inlets and bays [1160], Reefs [1170] and Submerged or partially submerged sea caves [8330]. The conservation status of Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time, Reefs1 and Submerged or partially submerged sea caves was assessed as Favourable. The conservation status of Estuaries and Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide was assessed as Unfavourable- Inadequate while Large shallow inlets and bays was assessed as Unfavourable-Bad. The principle reason for the failure of a site to meet Favourable conservation status was an increase in fine sediments, a reduction in the extent or abundance of an area mapped for one or more keystone communities, and/or an increase in invasive alien species (IAS). The main pressures acting on the sites were agriculture, commercial forestry, urbanisation (resulting in effluent discharge and storm water run-off) and aquaculture, together with the in-combination effects of these pressures. Future threats are considered to be those
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation of the Wildcat (Felis Silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the Conservation Status and Assessment of Conservation Activities
    Conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Scotland: Review of the conservation status and assessment of conservation activities Urs Breitenmoser, Tabea Lanz and Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten February 2019 Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 2 Cover photo: Wildcat (Felis silvestris) male meets domestic cat female, © L. Geslin. In spring 2018, the Scottish Wildcat Conservation Action Plan Steering Group commissioned the IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group to review the conservation status of the wildcat in Scotland and the implementation of conservation activities so far. The review was done based on the scientific literature and available reports. The designation of the geographical entities in this report, and the representation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The SWCAP Steering Group contact point is Martin Gaywood ([email protected]). Wildcat in Scotland – Review of Conservation Status and Activities 3 List of Content Abbreviations and Acronyms 4 Summary 5 1. Introduction 7 2. History and present status of the wildcat in Scotland – an overview 2.1. History of the wildcat in Great Britain 8 2.2. Present status of the wildcat in Scotland 10 2.3. Threats 13 2.4. Legal status and listing 16 2.5. Characteristics of the Scottish Wildcat 17 2.6. Phylogenetic and taxonomic characteristics 20 3. Recent conservation initiatives and projects 3.1. Conservation planning and initial projects 24 3.2. Scottish Wildcat Action 28 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Wrath Survey
    Cape Wrath Survey diver & guillemot May 2002 marbled swimming crab Summary Report velvet crab & gooseberry seasquirts brittlestars in pitted limestone tideswept kelp forest lemon sole Cape Wrath Survey North Coast As well as being a famous nautical Sites 9, 19, 20 and 21 on the north coast were swept by strong currents, and exposed to waves from landmark, Cape Wrath marks a northerly directions. Cuvie kelp forests grew in shallow water, with dense red algae (Delesseria geographical and biological sanguinea, Plocamium cartilagineum, Phycodrys rubens and Odonthalia dentata) on stipes and on boundary between the exposed, rocks beneath. At the extremely exposed offshore rock Duslic (Site 19), clumps of blue mussels current-swept north coast and grew on kelp stipes, and breadcrumb sponge was common wrapped around kelp stipes at several Pentland Firth, and the more gentle sites. In deeper water, animal turfs covered rocks. Dominant animals varied from site to site, but waters of the Minch. The survey colonial and small solitary seasquirts were particularly abundant. At An Garb Eilean (Site 9), a small covered 24 sites spread over a island used by the military for target practice, north-east facing rock slopes were covered with dense large area of this spectacular part oaten-pipe sea fir Tubularia indivisa, together with abundant elegant anemones on vertical faces. of north-west Scotland. Where rocks were scoured by nearby sand, bushy sea mats Securiflustra securifrons and Flustra foliacea were common, with featherstars and scattered jewel anemones on vertical faces. Cape Wrath Faraid Head Cape Wrath (Site 15) proved as spectacular underwater as above, with wave-battered slopes covered with cuvie kelp Rock and boulders at Sites 10 and 11, slightly sheltered (Laminaria hyperborea), and a dense short turf of animals from the main current by offshore rocks had little beneath the kelp and in deeper water.
    [Show full text]
  • Project FFH-Impact: Implementing the Habitats Directive in German Forests
    WORK REPORT Project FFH-Impact: Implementing the Habitats Directive in German forests Executive summary of a case study on the economic and natural impacts on forest enterprises Bernd Wippel, Gero Becker, Björn Seintsch, Lydia Rosenkranz, Hermann Englert, Matthias Dieter, Bernhard Möhring, Josef Stratmann, Johannes Gerst, Marian Paschke and Daniela Riedinger Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics in cooperation with Becker, Borchers and Wippel consultancy, the De- partment for Forest Economics and Forest Inventory of the University of Göttingen and the Faculty of Law of the Uni- versity of Hamburg. Zentrum Holzwirtschaft No. 01/2013 Universität Hamburg Johann Heinrich von Thuenen-Institute Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics Visiting address: Leuschnerstr. 91, 21031 Hamburg, Germany Postal address: Postfach 80 02 09, 21002 Hamburg, Germany Tel: 040 / 73962-301 Fax: 040 / 73962-399 Email: [email protected] Internet:http://www.vti.bund.de Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics in cooperation with Becker, Borchers and Wippel consultancy, Department of Forest Economics and Forest Management, University of Göttingen and the Faculty of Law, University of Hamburg Project FFH-Impact: Executive Summary by Bernd Wippel, Gero Becker, Björn Seintsch, Lydia Rosenkranz, Hermann Englert, Matthias Dieter, Bernhard Möhring, Josef Stratmann, Johannes Gerst, Marian Paschke and Daniela Riedinger Work report by the Institute of Forest Based Sector Economics 2013/1 Hamburg, January 2013 Final report of the project Topic: Joint research project:
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Support for Successful Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network
    Scientific support for successful implementation of the Natura 2000 network Focus Area B Guidance on the application of existing scientific approaches, methods, tools and knowledge for a better implementation of the Birds and Habitat Directives Environment FOCUS AREA B SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT FOR SUCCESSFUL i IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Imprint Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the European Commis- sion. The information and views set out in the handbook are Citation those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the Van der Sluis, T. & Schmidt, A.M. (2021). E-BIND Handbook (Part B): Scientific support for successful official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not implementation of the Natura 2000 network. Wageningen Environmental Research/ Ecologic Institute /Milieu guarantee the accuracy of the data included. The Commission Ltd. Wageningen, The Netherlands. or any person acting on the Commission’s behalf cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information Authors contained therein. Lead authors: This handbook has been prepared under a contract with the Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay (Monitoring of species and habitats within and beyond Natura 2000 sites) European Commission, in cooperation with relevant stakehold- Sander Mücher, Gerard Hazeu (Remote sensing techniques for the monitoring of Natura 2000 sites) ers. (EU Service contract Nr. 07.027740/2018/783031/ENV.D.3 Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay, Rene Henkens, Peter Verweij (Access to data and information) for evidence-based improvements in the Birds and Habitat Kris Decleer, Rienk-Jan Bijlsma (Guidance and tools for effective restoration measures for species and habitats) directives (BHD) implementation: systematic review and meta- Theo van der Sluis, Rob Jongman (Green Infrastructure and network coherence) analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptions of New Serpulid Polychaetes from the Kimberleys Of
    © The Author, 2009. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2009 Records of the Australian Museum (2009) Vol. 61: 93–199. ISSN 0067-1975 doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.61.2009.1489 Descriptions of New Serpulid Polychaetes from the Kimberleys of Australia and Discussion of Australian and Indo-West Pacific Species of Spirobranchus and Superficially Similar Taxa T. Gottfried Pillai Zoology Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom absTracT. In 1988 Pat Hutchings of the Australian Museum, Sydney, undertook an extensive polychaete collection trip off the Kimberley coast of Western Australia, where such a survey had not been conducted since Augener’s (1914) description of some polychaetes from the region. Serpulids were well represented in the collection, and their present study revealed the existence of two new genera, and new species belonging to the genera Protula, Vermiliopsis, Hydroides, Serpula and Spirobranchus. The synonymy of the difficult genera Spirobranchus, Pomatoceros and Pomatoleios is also dealt with. Certain difficult taxa currently referred to as “species complexes” or “species groups” are discussed. For this purpose it was considered necessary to undertake a comparison of apparently similar species, especially of Spirobranchus, from other locations in Australia and the Indo-West Pacific region. It revealed the existence of many more new species, which are also described and discussed below. Pillai, T. Gottfried, 2009. Descriptions of new serpulid polychaetes from the Kimberleys of Australia and discussion of Australian and Indo-West Pacific species ofSpirobranchus and superficially similar taxa.Records of the Australian Museum 61(2): 93–199. Table of contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 95 Material and methods ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The EU Birds and Habitats Directives for Nature and People in Europe
    The EU Birds and Habitats Directives For nature and people in Europe Environment European Commission Environment Directorate General Author: Kerstin Sundseth, Ecosystems LTD, Brussels Commission coordinator: Sylvia Barova, European Commission, Natura 2000 unit B.3, – B-1049 Brussels Graphic design: NatureBureau, United Kingdom. www.naturebureau.co.uk Additional information on Natura 2000 is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers and these may be billed Additional information on the European Union is available at: http://europa.eu © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged The photos are copyrighted and cannot be used without prior approval from the photographers Printed in Belgium Printed on recycled paper that has been awarded the EU eco-label for graphic paper (http://ec.europa; eu/ecolabel) Cover photo: Puffins, Fratercula arctica, on Farne Islands, Scotland, UK © Hans Christoph Kappel/naturepl.com Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union, 2014 3 Contents 4–5 Europe’s biodiversity – a rich natural heritage 6–7 An invaluable resource for society 8–9 Europe’s biodiversity – under threat 10–11 EU nature legislation – a unique partnership 12–13 Scope and objective 14–15 Key requirements 16–17 Species protection 18–19 The Natura 2000 Network – a coordinated ecological network 20–21 Site designation 22–23 Managing Natura 2000 sites 24–25 Natura 2000 – part of a living landscape 26–27 Promoting sustainable development 28–29 Natura 2000 permits for new plans and projects 30–31 Investing in the future for the benefit of nature and people 32–33 The challenges ahead 35 Further information and photographers’ credits 4 5 Europe’s biodiversity – a rich natural heritage Europe covers less than 5% of the planet’s land mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden's Biodiversity at Risk: a Call to Action
    Sweden’s biodiversity at risk A call for action Sweden hosts a large proportion of the species that are threatened at the European level, and has the important responsibility for protecting these species within its territory. Species in Sweden require greater action to improve their status. While many species already receive some conservation attention, others do not. Species can be saved from extinction but this requires a combination of sound research and carefully coordinated efforts. Sweden as an EU Member State has committed to halting biodiversity loss by 2020 but urgent action is needed to meet this target and better monitoring capacity is required to measure if the target is met. Considerable conservation investment is needed from Sweden to ensure that the status of European species improves in the long term. This document provides an overview of the conservation status of species in Sweden based on the results of all European Red Lists completed to date. It does not provide the status of the species in the country, therefore we invite the reader to cross check national and sub- national Red Lists. Together, they can be used to help guide policies and local conservation strategies. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES ™ The European Red List The European Red List of Species is a review of the conservation status of more than 6,000 species in Europe according to the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria and the regional Red Listing guidelines. It identifies species that are threatened with extinction at the European level so that appropriate conservation actions can be taken to improve their status.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Behaviour of European Wildcats in Species Specific Enclosures
    Symposium Biology and Conservation of the European Wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) Germany January 21st –23rd 2005 Abstracts Mathias Herrmann, Hof 30, 16247 Parlow, [email protected], Mobil: ++49 +171 9962910 Introduction More than four years after the last meeting of wildcat experts in Nienover, Germany, the NABU (Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.) invited for a three day symposium on the conservation of the European wildcat. Since the last meeting the knowledge on wildcat ecology increased a lot due to the field work of several research teams. The aim of the symposium was to bring these teams together to discuss especially questions which could not be solved by one single team due to limited number of observed individuals or special landscape features. The focus was set on the following questions: 1) Hybridization and risk of infection by domestic cat - a threat to wild living populations? 2) Reproductive success, mating behaviour, and life span - what strategy do wildcats have? 3) ffh - reports/ monitoring - which methods should be used? 4) Habitat utilization in different landscapes - species of forest or semi-open landscape? 5) Conservation of the wildcat - which measures are practicable? 6) Migrations - do wildcats have juvenile dispersal? 75 Experts from 9 European countries came to Fischbach within the transboundary Biosphere Reserve "Vosges du Nord - Pfälzerwald" to discuss distribution, ecology and behaviour of this rare species. The symposium was organized by one single person - Dr. Mathias Herrmann - and consisted of oral presentations, posters and different workshops. 2 Scientific program Friday Jan 21st 8:00 – 10:30 registration /optional: Morning excursion to the core area of the biosphere reserve 10:30 Genot, J-C., Stein, R., Simon, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Reef-Building, Ecosystem Engineering Polychaetes in Shallow Water Ecosystems
    diversity Review Role of Reef-Building, Ecosystem Engineering Polychaetes in Shallow Water Ecosystems Martín Bruschetti 1,2 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)-CONICET, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio de Ecología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, FCEyN, Laboratorio de Ecología 7600, Argentina Received: 15 June 2019; Accepted: 15 September 2019; Published: 17 September 2019 Abstract: Although the effect of ecosystem engineers in structuring communities is common in several systems, it is seldom as evident as in shallow marine soft-bottoms. These systems lack abiotic three-dimensional structures but host biogenic structures that play critical roles in controlling abiotic conditions and resources. Here I review how reef-building polychaetes (RBP) engineer their environment and affect habitat quality, thus regulating community structure, ecosystem functioning, and the provision of ecosystem services in shallow waters. The analysis focuses on different engineering mechanisms, such as hard substrate production, effects on hydrodynamics, and sediment transport, and impacts mediated by filter feeding and biodeposition. Finally, I deal with landscape-level topographic alteration by RBP. In conclusion, RBP have positive impacts on diversity and abundance of many species mediated by the structure of the reef. Additionally, by feeding on phytoplankton and decreasing water turbidity, RBP can control primary production, increase light penetration, and might alleviate the effects of eutrophication
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Document on the Strict Protection of Animal Species of Community Interest Under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
    Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC Final version, February 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 I. CONTEXT 6 I.1 Species conservation within a wider legal and political context 6 I.1.1 Political context 6 I.1.2 Legal context 7 I.2 Species conservation within the overall scheme of Directive 92/43/EEC 8 I.2.1 Primary aim of the Directive: the role of Article 2 8 I.2.2 Favourable conservation status 9 I.2.3 Species conservation instruments 11 I.2.3.a) The Annexes 13 I.2.3.b) The protection of animal species listed under both Annexes II and IV in Natura 2000 sites 15 I.2.4 Basic principles of species conservation 17 I.2.4.a) Good knowledge and surveillance of conservation status 17 I.2.4.b) Appropriate and effective character of measures taken 19 II. ARTICLE 12 23 II.1 General legal considerations 23 II.2 Requisite measures for a system of strict protection 26 II.2.1 Measures to establish and effectively implement a system of strict protection 26 II.2.2 Measures to ensure favourable conservation status 27 II.2.3 Measures regarding the situations described in Article 12 28 II.2.4 Provisions of Article 12(1)(a)-(d) in relation to ongoing activities 30 II.3 The specific protection provisions under Article 12 35 II.3.1 Deliberate capture or killing of specimens of Annex IV(a) species 35 II.3.2 Deliberate disturbance of Annex IV(a) species, particularly during periods of breeding, rearing, hibernation and migration 37 II.3.2.a) Disturbance 37 II.3.2.b) Periods
    [Show full text]
  • A Race to Protect Europe's Natural Heritage WWF European
    A Race to Protect Europe’s Natural Heritage WWF European Snapshot Report on the Status of Implementation of the Habitats Directive GERMANY Score: 13/30 I. Legal Aspects of Implementation Score: 3/9 Transposition: To what extent has the Habitats Directive been transposed into national or regional law? Good/complete Some gaps remaining Key/major gaps Failure to transpose transposition remaining 3 2 1 0 Whereas the Habitats Directive has been transposed into national law fairly well, it almost completely lacks transposition into regional law. This is a significant gap, since the German constitution places nature conservation within the responsibility of the 16 states (Länder). It is thus almost solely a regional matter. Only a small number of issues may be fully regulated on a nation-wide basis by national law, and major portions of the Habitats Directive are not among them. This means that, to put the Habitats Directive into full effect, transposition into state law is crucial. Major gaps remain especially in the transposition of Articles 6, 10 16 into regional law. Several states have not even attempted to improve their laws for nature protection (Naturschutzgesetz). According to the Habitats Directive’s requirements, not a single state has done so in an adequate way. In some cases, the states tried to take legal measures short of altering their regional laws (legal instruments of Richtlinie or Erlass), which is an appropriate way to cope with some details, but definitely not the whole Directive. Thus, for the majority of states transposition remains to be completed. Complaints in Progress at the European level: How significant are current Commission complaints in progress against your Member State? No outstanding Some complaints not Significant Decisions of the ECJ complaints yet dealt with complaints not yet not yet dealt with dealt with 3 2 1 0 In April 1998 the legal procedure initiated by the Commission against Germany was sent to the ECJ following Germany’s failure to provide a complete (or even nearly complete) list of sites.
    [Show full text]