Catalogue General Cosma -30 A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fragrance List Print
Quality Fragrances . Unbeatable Prices Fragrance List Top Sellers - Women Love Spell Type* (W) Gucci Guilty Type* (W) Romance Type* (W) Ed Hardy Type*RAJOHN (W) Heat by Beyonce Type* (W)AROMASBlack by Kenneth Cole Type* (W) Moon Sparkle Type* (W) Jimmy Choo Type* (W) Beautiful Type* (W) Love Struck Type* (W) Pleasures Type* (W) Bombshell by VS Type* (W) Pink Sugar by Aquolina Type* (W) Reb'l Fleur Type* (W) Black Woman Type* (W) Be Delicious Type* (W) White Diamonds Type* (W) Versace Bright Crystsal Type* (W) Light Blue by Dolce & Gabbana Type* (W) Cashmere Mist Type* (W) Candy by Prada Type* (W) Issey Miyake Type* (W) Butt Naked Type* (W) Michael Kors Type* (W) Angel by VS Type* (W) Can Can by Paris Hilton Type* (W) Cucumber Melon by B&BW Type* (W) Modern Muse by Estee Lauder Type* (W) Daisy by Marc Jacobs Type* (W) Miss Dior Cherie Type* (W) Angel Type* (W) Euphoria by CK Type* (W) Lick Me All Over Chanel #5 Type* (W) Amber Blush Type* (W) Viva La Juicy Type* (W) Coco Chanel Type* (W) Halle by Halle Berry Type* (W) Pink Friday by Nicki Minaj Type* (W) Dolce & Gabbana Type* (W) Happy Type* (W) Dot by Marc Jacobs Type* (W) Flower Bomb Type* (W) Japanese Cherry Blossom Type* (W) Burberry Weekend Type* (W) Glow by J. Lo Type* (W) Juicy Couture Type* (W) Coach Type* (W) Acqua Di Gio Type* (W) Poppy by Coach Type* (W) Top Sellers - Men Polo Red Type* (M) Polo Blue Type* (M) Grey Vetiver by Tom Ford Type* (M) Jay-Z Gold Type* (M) Unforgivable Type* (M) Usher Type* (M) Gucci Guilty Type* (M) Chrome Legend Type* (M) Cucumber Melon by B&BW Type* -
Dior Cosmetics, Fragrances & More Ingredients List
Dior Cosmetics, Fragrances & More Ingredients List 1 Synthetic fluorphlogopite, talc, boron nitriqe, barium sulfate, diphenyl dimethiconeninyl diphenyl dimethicone/silsesquioxane crosspolymer, nylon-12, octylex)decyl stearoyl stearate, magnesium myristate, phenyl trimethicone, acrylates/stbnftyl acrylate/dimeihicone methacrylate copolymer, calcium aluminum borosilicate, pentylene glycol, hdi/trimethylcl hexyllactone crosspolymer, dimethicone, lauroyl lysine, sodium dehydroacetate, silica, hydrogen dimethicone, tin oxide, palmitic acid, magnesium hydroxide n 09384/a. 2 Synthetic fluorphlogopite, dimethicone, talc, diisostearyl malate, methyl methacrylate crosspolymer, petrolatum, mica, trimethylolpropane triethylhexanoate, magnesium myristate, hdi/ppg/ polycaprolactone crosspolymer, sorbitan sesquiisostearate, siuca, trimethylsiloxysilicate, polypropyl, silsesqumane, sodium dehydroacetate, sorbic acid, ethylhexylglycerin, glyceryl caprylate, tocopherol n 09458/a. 3 Dimethicone, mica, talc, diisostearyl malate, synthetic fluorphlogopite, methyl methacrylate crosspolymer, petrolatum, trimethylolpropane triethylhexanoate, magnesium myristate, hdi/ppg/ polycaprolactone crosspolymer, silica, sorbitan sesquiisostearate, trimethylsiloxysilicate, polypropyl- silsesquioxane, sodium dehydroacetate, sorbic acid, lauroyl lysine, ethylhexylglycerin, glyceryl caprylate, tin oxide, tocopherol, n 09451/a. 5 Color Designer All In One Artistry Palette - 4 Dimethicone, talc, calcium sodium borosilicate, silica, No. 208 Navy Design diisostearyl malate, petrolatum, -
Christian Dior / Evora
BENELUX-GERECHTSHOF COUR DE JUSTICE BENELUX A 95/4/14 ARREST van 16 december 1998 in de zaak A 95/4 -------------------------- Inzake : Christian Dior N.V. tegen Evora B.V. Procestaal : Nederlands ARRET du 16 décembre 1998 dans l’affaire A 95/4 ----------------------------- En cause : Christian Dior S.A. contre Evora B.V. Langue de la procédure : le néerlandais 2 HET BENELUX-GERECHTSHOF In de zaak A 95/4 1. Gelet op het op 20 oktober 1995 door de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden uitgesproken arrest in de zaak nr. 15.735 van PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR S.A., gevestigd te Parijs, en PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR B.V., gevestigd te Rotterdam, eiseressen tot cassatie (hierna afzonderlijk te noemen : Dior Frankrijk, respectievelijk Dior Nederland en gezamenlijk : Dior), tegen EVORA B.V., gevestigd te Renswoude, verweerster in cassatie (verder te noemen : Evora), waarbij overeenkomstig artikel 6 van het Verdrag betreffende de instelling en het statuut van een Benelux-Gerechtshof aan dit Hof vragen van uitleg van de Eenvormige Beneluxwet op de merken (BMW) worden gesteld; TEN AANZIEN VAN DE FEITEN: 2. Overwegende dat de Hoge Raad de feiten waarop de door het Benelux- Gerechtshof te geven uitleg moet worden toegepast, als volgt heeft omschreven: i) Dior Frankrijk ontwikkelt en produceert verscheidene parfums en andere cosmetische producten die zij onder verschillende merken op de markt brengt. Deze producten hebben een relatief hoge prijs en worden gerekend tot de markt van de luxueuze cosmetische producten. ii) Dior Frankrijk heeft voor de verkoop van haar producten in landen buiten Frankrijk alleenvertegenwoordigers aangesteld; Dior Nederland is in Nederland zulk een alleenvertegenwoordiger. -
OPINION of ADVOCATE GENERAL JACOBS Delivered on 29 April 1997 *
OPINION OF MR JACOBS — CASE C-337/95 OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL JACOBS delivered on 29 April 1997 * 1. The essential question in the present case condition that those retailers supply only to is whether a trade mark proprietor may rely ultimate consumers or other selected upon his trade mark rights to prevent the retailers. advertising of goods placed on the market by him or with his consent, in circumstances in which such advertising damages the luxuri ous and prestigious image of his mark. In particular, is the prevention of such advertis ing possible if the reseller is merely advertis ing in a manner customary to his trade? The 3. Dior France has exclusive rights in the case comes by way of a preliminary refer Benelux to the Eau Sauvage, Poison, Fahren ence from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden heit and Dune picture trade marks, inter alia (Supreme Court of the Netherlands). for class 3 products including perfumes. Those marks consist of illustrations of the packaging in which the bottles containing the perfumes bearing those names are sold. In addition, Dior France has copyright in both that packaging and those bottles and in Facts and procedure before the national the packaging and bottles of products mar court keted under the name of Svelte. 4. The defendant, Evora BV ('Evora'), oper 2. The second plaintiff, Parfums Christian ates a chain of shops under the name of its Dior ('Dior Netherlands'), is the sole repre subsidiary Kruidvat. Those shops are sentative in the Netherlands of the first described in the order for reference as chem plaintiff, Parfums Christian Dior SA ('Dior ists' shops. -
Parfums Christian Dior Sa & (And) Anor V
Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 27 Number 4 Fall Article 9 May 2020 Parfums Christian Dior Sa & (and) Anor v. Evora BV Douglas R. Hegg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Douglas R. Hegg, Parfums Christian Dior Sa & (and) Anor v. Evora BV, 27 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 669 (1999). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR SA & ANOR V. EVORA BV DOUGLAS R. HEGG* I. INTRODUCTION Unrestricted trade is an essential step in the equalization and inte- gration of the European Community.1 This case note proposes that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is correct in encouraging parallel im- ports as a means of promoting unrestricted intra-Community trade. Similarly, assuming parallel imports provide an important benefit to the community, manufacturers should not be able to side-step such benefits by imposing artificial limits on parallel importers' ability to ad- vertise the products legally imported and offered for sale. Parfumes Christian Dior SA v. Evora BV provides a basis upon which future courts may balance the rights conferred by a trademark and the Com- munity's interest in the free movement of goods. Price discrepancies among Member States of the European Union (EU) have resulted in a practice known as "parallel imports," whereby individuals purchase products on the market in low-price countries, ex- port them to high-price countries for resale at a profit, and still under- cut the manufacturer's official selling price.2 General principles of eco- nomics suggest that such actions will continue as long as the costs of transportation are less than the profit derived on resale. -
Appendix a List of Fragrances
Appendix A List of fragrances The perfumes and fragrances in this list are mostly, though not entirely, still being marketed. Some are not sold in the UK. Those in bold type are described in more detail in the main text. Fragrances for men are indicated by 'm'. The year is mostly that of UK launching. Name House Year Family/brief description A by Annabella AnnabellalDenis 87 Floral m Accomplice Coty 54 Fougere m Acqua di Selva Victor 47 Lavender m Acteur Azzaro 89 Chypre (leather, woody) Adeline Pola 72 Aldehyde (floral) m Adidas Astor /Beecham 85 Green Adieu Sagesse Patou 25(84) Floral m Admirals's Mas 81 Leather Yachtman Adolfo Denney 78 Floral (sweet) m Adolfo for Men Denney 81 Chypre Afghane d'Estrees 80 Floral (sweet) Ago Perrin 79 Floral m Agresste Gal 82 Chypre m Agua Brava Puig 68 Lavender m Agua Lavanda Puig 40 Lavender m Agua Profunda Puig 77 Citrus Ainsi Atkinsons 71 Green m Ajonc Rocher 72 Green Alada Myrurgia 79 Green m Alain Delon Delon 80 Chypre Alfred Sung Riviera Concepts 86 Floral Alliage Lauder 72 Green Allora Marbert 82 Floral (fruity-fresh) Amarige Givenchy 91 Floral (woody) Amazone Hermes 75(89) Floral (fruity-fresh) 262 Appendix A Name House Year Family/brief description Ambush Dana 59 Fougere Amen Wardy Wardy 87 Floral Amerique Courreges 79 Chypre (fresh- mossy) Amorena Cantilene 79 Green Amouage Amouage 84 Floral-oriental Amour Amour Patou 25(84) Floral Amun 4711 81 Oriental Anabella Denis 87 Floral Anais-Anais Cacharel 79 Floral (fruity-fresh) Andron Jovan 81 Chypre (floral- musky) m Andron for Men Jovan 81 Chypre Animale S. -
Article 177 References to the European Court
Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 27 Number 4 Fall Article 8 May 2020 Article 177 References to the European Court Vladimir Shifrin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Vladimir Shifrin, Article 177 References to the European Court, 27 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 657 (1999). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. ARTICLE 177 REFERENCES TO THE EUROPEAN COURT VLADIMIR SHIFRIN* I. INTRODUCTION In many ways the most important aspect of the work of the Euro- pean Court of Justice (ECJ or Court of Justice) is its jurisdiction to give "preliminary rulings" under Article 177 of the Treaty of Rome'. Dis- putes involving Community law never come directly before the Court of Justice, but rather before the courts and tribunals of the Member States. Treaty provisions enable the Court of Justice to rule on ques- tions of Community law, which arise in such litigation.2 The system of "preliminary rulings" has proved a particularly effective means of se- curing rights claimed under Community law. 3 The term "preliminary ruling" is somewhat of a misnomer. The ruling is requested and given in the course of proceedings before the national court. 4 It is therefore an interlocutory ruling, a step in the proceeding before the national court.5 The effect is that any question of Community law in an issue be- Vladimir Shifrin is currently a third year law student at the University of Denver College of Law, and a 1989 graduate of the University of Colorado at Denver, B.S, Busi- ness Information Systems Analysis, Management and Design.