DOCSLIB.ORG

October 1996 Federal Election Commission Volume 22, Number 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October 1996 Federal Election Commission Volume 22, Number 10 October 1996 Federal Election Commission Volume 22, Number 10 Table of Contents Reports Reports Court Cases 1 Reports Due in October 7 Texas Special Elections Reports Due in October FEC v. Christian Action 8 Missouri Special Election With one exception,1 all types of Network Court Cases political committees must file one or On August 2, 1996, the U.S. 1 FEC v. Christian Action Network more reports in October, as ex- 2 Stockman v. FEC Court of Appeals for the Fourth 2 New Litigation plained below. Reports must be filed Circuit, in an unpublished opinion, with the appropriate federal and upheld the district court’s dismissal Public Funding state filing offices. of this case. 3 Dole, Clinton, Perot Receive For more information on report- The FEC had brought suit against Public Funds ing, see the January Record or call the Christian Action Network for Regulations the FEC’s Flashfax service (202/ making independent expenditures 1 3 Final Rules on Electronic Filing 501-3413) and request document with corporate funds and for failing Statistics number 0345. to comply with the law’s reporting 4 18-Month House and Senate and disclaimer requirements. Activity Third Quarter Report The communications in ques- 4 18-Month Party Activity Committees filing on a quarterly tion—a television advertisement and 4 How to Get Statistical Press basis must file an October quarterly two newspaper ads run in the weeks Releases report due October 15. before the 1992 Presidential election Information October Monthly Report were critical of then-candidate Bill 4 New Party Guide Monthly filers must file a report Clinton’s positions on homosexual 10 Flashfax Menu due October 20 and covering issues. 5 Advisory Opinions September activity. The district court ruled that the communications were outside the Election Administration 12-Day Pre-Election Report FEC’s jurisdiction because they did 6 Simplifying Election Forms The pre-election report for the not expressly advocate the election Compliance November 5 general election must or defeat of Bill Clinton. (The 9 Nonfilers be filed by: district court decision is summarized 9 MUR Information Available in the September 1995 issue, On Line • Committees of candidates running page 2.) in the November 5 election; (continued on page 2) 9 Federal Register Notices (continued on page 6) 11 Index 1 An independent expenditure is an 1 The exception is for committees of expenditure made without any coordi- candidates who did not seek election in nation with a candidate’s campaign for 1996. Their next report is the 1996 a communication which expressly year-end report covering July through advocates the election or defeat of a December, which is due January 31, clearly identified candidate for federal 1997. office. 11 CFR 100.16. Federal Election Commission RECORD October 1996 Court Cases Background August Court Decision (continued from page 1) Various newspapers reported that On August 27, 1996, the court The court of appeals, finding “no Mr. Stockman’s opponent in the found the FEC had not unreasonably error” in the district court opinion, 1994 Republican primary (9th delayed action on MUR 3847. The affirmed that court’s decision. Congressional District, Texas) had court considered several facts in U.S. Court of Appeals for the filed a complaint with the FEC reaching this decision: claiming that: (1) a newspaper Third Circuit, No. 95-2600, August • The FEC is not required to resolve allegedly published in the Stockman 2, 1996; D.Ct. No. 94-82-L, June MURs within a statutory deadline. home and campaign headquarters 28, 1995. ✦ • The agency’s delay in MUR 3847 should have been identified as does not risk human health and campaign literature; and (2) the welfare, where delay would be newspaper’s advertising revenue Stockman v. FEC intolerable. should have been reported as • The time the FEC has taken thus In August 1996, a U.S. District campaign contributions. far to investigate MUR 3847 is Court in Texas dismissed Congress- Mr. Stockman and his two reasonable considering that similar man Stephen E. Stockman’s claim campaign committees filed suit in MURs have taken the agency that the FEC had unreasonably November 1995 asking the court to between 3.3 and 4.6 years to delayed its investigation into his dismiss the complaint (Matter Under resolve. 1994 campaign. The court said: Review or MUR 3847) for a number • If the court were to force the FEC “There is no evidence showing that of reasons, including their claim that to take immediate action, the the time spent to investigate this the FEC had unreasonably delayed agency would have to divest scarce matter is a product of anything other its investigation into the matter in resources from matters of equal or than the excessive demands on a violation of the Administrative higher priority. strapped federal agency.” Procedure Act. The plaintiffs also • The plaintiffs provided no real In an earlier decision, the court claimed that the FEC had breached evidence that the delay had caused dismissed the claim that the FEC the confidentiality provisions of the them any injury. had improperly leaked information Federal Election Campaign Act by • The issues presented in MUR 3847 about the matter to the press. leaking information to the press are novel and will likely require about MUR 3847. (The confidential- substantially more time to consider ity of MUR proceedings is provided than issues more frequently for under 2 U.S.C. §437g(a)(12).) Federal Election Commission investigated. 999 E Street, NW June Court Decision Washington, DC 20463 In granting summary judgment to In a June 13, 1996, decision, the the FEC, the court said that the 800/424-9530 court rejected the argument that agency’s delay in resolving MUR 202/219-3420 MUR 3847 should be dismissed 3847 was not unreasonable, given 202/501-3413 (Flashfax Service) because the FEC had violated the the complexity of the FEC’s current 202/219-3336 (TDD for the confidentiality provisions. The court workload and the depleted level of hearing impaired) ruled that the plaintiffs could not 800/877-8339 (FIRS) agency resources to handle the raise the confidentiality issue in workload. Lee Ann Elliott, Chairman court because they had failed to first U.S. District Court for the John Warren McGarry, raise the issue before the FEC. Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Vice Chairman Furthermore, the court said that Division, 1:95-CV-1049, August 27, Joan D. Aikens, Commissioner there was no evidence indicating 1996. ✦ Danny L. McDonald, that the FEC had improperly leaked Commissioner Scott E. Thomas, Commissioner information. The court noted that the agency had not breached confi- New Litigation John C. Surina, Staff Director dentiality by merely confirming to Lawrence M. Noble, General reporters that a complaint had been FEC v. Kalogianis Counsel filed against the plaintiffs. The only The FEC asks the court to declare Published by the Information issue remaining after the June that Anastasios Kalogianis violated Division decision was whether the Commis- the contribution limits of 2 U.S.C. Louise D. Wides, Director sion had unreasonably delayed the §441a by making $249,000 in loans Stephanie Fitzgerald, Editor investigation. to the Tsongas for President Com- http://www.fec.gov mittee, the 1992 authorized commit- tee of Senator Paul E. Tsongas. One 2 October 1996 Federal Election Commission RECORD of the loans was made payable to an ment (COLA). The 1995 COLA total campaign spending to $61.82 individual, the committee’s chief (309.1 percent) increased the base million. His legal and accounting fundraiser, but was purportedly grant to $61.82 million. Major party compliance expenses (like those of solicited on behalf of the committee nominees have received public the major party candidates) are and given with the intention of funding grants since the program exempt from the spending limit. funding the campaign. began in 1976. All the candidates must limit The FEC also asks the court to Mr. Perot became eligible for a spending from personal funds to assess an appropriate civil penalty $29 million entitlement because he $50,000. against Mr. Kalogianis and perma- won more than 19 percent of the The last time a nonmajor party nently enjoin him from similar vote in the 1992 Presidential candidate received general election violations. election. Under the public funding funding was in 1980, when John U.S. District Court for the law, a nonmajor party candidate Anderson and his running mate, District of New Hampshire, C-96- who collects more than 5 percent of Patrick J. Lucey, received $4.2 427-JD, August 9, 1996. ✦ the vote in a Presidential election is million after the general election. entitled to receive pre-election They were entitled to post-election funding in the next Presidential funding because they won over 5 election once he or she obtains the percent of the vote in the election. nomination of a political party and Thus far in the 1996 Presidential meets other requirements. The pre- season, the Commission has certi- Public Funding election entitlement is based on the fied $234 million in public funds: ratio of votes received by the • $56 million to the 11 primary nonmajor party candidate in the Dole, Clinton, Perot Receive candidates who qualified for previous election to the average Public Funds matching funds; votes received by the major party • $25 million to major parties for The FEC recently approved candidates. (In Mr. Perot’s case, the their nominating conventions; and public funding grants for the ratio works out to 47 percent.) • $153 million to the general elec- Democratic, Republican and Reform All the candidates had to submit tion candidates. ✦ Party tickets. “letters of agreements and certifica- On August 15, the FEC certified tions” in which they agreed to payment of $61.82 million for the comply with the law and submit to a general election campaign of post-election campaign audit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Washington Post September 16, 1996, Monday No Place for Perot In
    The Washington Post September 16, 1996, Monday No Place for Perot In the Debates David J. Garrow OP-ED; Pg. A19 LENGTH: 672 words The Commission on Presidential Debates is to decide soon whether Reform Party nominee Ross Perot and running mate Pat Choate will be included in the presidential and vice-presidential debates that are scheduled to begin next week. Commission members say their top criterion for inclusion is whether a ticket has a "realistic" chance of winning. By that standard as by others, there ought to be no debate: Neither Ross Perot nor Pat Choate is a realistic -- or even plausible -- president of the United States. Recent national opinion surveys show the Perot-Choate ticket drawing only 5 percent support -- a far cry from the 19 percent that Perot ended up with after his on-and-off campaign in 1992. What's more, monthly polls in crucial states where Perot and Choate's Buchanan-like message of economic protectionism ought to be popular show that Perot's support has been dropping like a stone. In Michigan, Perot's 19 percent backing in July fell to 10 percent in August and to just 4 percent in early September. Indeed, it's hard to envision any state where Perot-Choate could challenge Dole-Kemp or Clinton-Gore even for second place, and there may be some, like Alaska and California, where either Libertarian nominee Harry Browne or Green Party candidate Ralph Nader could outdo Perot for third place. Perot's only hope for a chance at increased voter support is the commission.
    [Show full text]
  • P.O. Box 9 SECRETARIAT
    of the United States of Afl«fc»!SSlOK P.O. Box 9 SECRETARIAT Russell J. Verney, Chairman TEL: (972) 450-8800 Jim Maogta, Secretary Pat Benjamin, Vke Chair FAX: (972) 450-8821 Mike Morris, Treasurer January 12, 19* Michael Marinelli, Esq. Office of die General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E. Street NW Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: Executive Committee of the Reform Party of the United States as the National Committee of a Political Party Dear Mr. Marinelli, The Reform Party of the United States of America ("Reform Party, USA'*) requests an advisory opinion seeking Commission recognition of its Executive Committee as the national committee of a political party. It also requests the Commission recognize each state Reform Party as a state committee of a political party. The Reform Party, USA, can trace its origins to 1992 and the activities of most constituent state parties to a period beginning September, 1995, when in response to numerous long-standing requests from third-party advocates, efforts to establish a new national political party began. To this end, registration and petition drives and organizing efforts were conducted in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The resulting parties, together with philosophically aligned pre-existing state political parties, joined together with Reform Party members from across the country in Long Beach, California and Valley Forge, Pennsylvania to nominate a presidential and vice-presidential candidate for the 1996 general election. During the same year, Reform Parties in thirteen states obtained ballot access for candidates for other federal offices. Following the 1996 election, in which the Reform Parties presidential and vice- presidential candidates obtained 8.4% of the popular vote, the Reform Parties agreed to conduct a national meeting to further the process of party development.
    [Show full text]
  • Fileprod-Prc-Dc\Peoplepress\Pew Projects
    FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1996, 5:00 P.M. Campaign Finance Charges Raise Doubts Among 7% of Clinton Backers FINAL PEW CENTER SURVEY-CLINTON 52%, DOLE 38%, PEROT 9% FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Kohut, Director Robert C. Toth, Senior Associate Kimberly Parker, Research Director Claudia Deane, Survey Analyst Pew Research Center for The People & The Press 202/293-3126 http://www.people-press.org Campaign Finance Charges Raise Doubts among 7% of Clinton Backers FINAL PEW CENTER SURVEY - CLINTON 52%, DOLE 38%, PEROT 9% Bill Clinton's lead over Bob Dole and Ross Perot remains as wide and deep at the end of the final week of the campaign as it has been for the past two months, despite the growing controversy about Democratic campaign finance irregularities. The Pew Research Center's final survey of 1,211 likely voters, taken October 31 through November 3, finds 49% supporting Clinton, 36% Dole, 8% Perot, 1% other candidates, with 6% undecided. When the undecided voters are allocated, the Center's best estimate of the probable outcome of the election is 52% for Clinton, 38% for Dole, 9% for Perot, and 1% for other candidates. Presidential Voting Intentions ---Registered Voters --- --- Likely Voters --- Early Late Early Late July Sept Sept Oct Nov Sept Sept Oct Nov %%%%% %%%% Clinton 4452515151 50505049 Dole 34 34 35 34 32 38 38 38 36 Perot 16 8 7 8 9 7 6 6 8 DK/Other 6 6 7 7 8 5 6 6 7 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Voters favor Democratic candidates over Republicans for the House of Representatives by a much narrower margin: 48% of likely voters say they are inclined to back a Democratic candidate in their district, 44% a Republican candidate, with 8% undecided.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    c01.qxd 11/07/05 3:37 PM Page 9 1 NAFTA: Class Reunion This fight is not a traditional fight between Democrats and Republicans, and liberals and conservatives. It is right at the center of the effort that we’re making in America to define what the future is going to be about. —President Bill Clinton, September 1993 Bill Clinton’s Party As the C-SPAN videotape of the White House event of the morning of September 14, 1993, begins to roll, the camera’s eye picks up the trim pinstriped figure of Robert Rubin. He strolls through the crowd of sev- eral hundred men and women in business suits settling into their chairs in the stately East Room. Rubin, the ex-cochair of the investment firm Goldman Sachs, is chief of Bill Clinton’s Economic Security Council— and soon toCOPYRIGHTED become his secretary of the treasury. MATERIAL He has the cool, unruf- fled look of an impresario, confident that all the details have been han- dled, patiently waiting to sit back and watch the show. The camera angle widens onto a sea of some three hundred suits. We can pick out the most prominent faces of Washington’s political class: the Democratic Speaker of the House and Senate majority leader; the Republican House and Senate leaders; the secretaries of state, treasury, and other cabinet officers; nine state governors. Others, not so well-known to the C-SPAN audience: lobbyists for the world’s largest multinational 9 c01.qxd 11/07/05 3:37 PM Page 10 10 GLOBAL CLASS WAR corporations; executives from the Business Roundtable, Chamber of Com- merce, and other business associations; the Mexican ambassador; the Canadian ambassador.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler County Ohio General Election November 5
    BUTLER COUNTY OHIO GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 1996 Total Pct Precincts Counted - TOTAL -251- 251 100.00 Precincts Counted - FAIRFIELD CITY -41- 41 100.00 Precincts Counted - HAMILTON CITY -42- 42 100.00 Precincts Counted - MIDDLETOWN CITY -35- 35 100.00 Precincts Counted - MONROE CITY -6- 6 100.00 Precincts Counted - OXFORD CITY -14- 14 100.00 Precincts Counted - SHARONVILLE CITY -2- 2 100.00 Precincts Counted - TRENTON CITY -5- 5 100.00 Precincts Counted - FAIR.TWP/INDIAN SP -10 10 100.00 Precincts Counted - HANOVER TWP. -7- 7 100.00 Precincts Counted - LEMON TWP. -4- 4 100.00 Precincts Counted - LIBERTY TWP. -9- 9 100.00 Precincts Counted - MADISON TWP. -7- 7 100.00 Precincts Counted - MILFORD TWP. -4- 4 100.00 Precincts Counted - MORGAN TWP. -5- 5 100.00 Precincts Counted - OXFORD TWP. -3- 3 100.00 Precincts Counted - REILY TWP. -2- 2 100.00 Precincts Counted - ROSS TWP. -5- 5 100.00 Precincts Counted - ST CLAIR TWP. -7- 7 100.00 Precincts Counted - UNION TWP. -40- 40 100.00 Precincts Counted - WAYNE TWP. -3- 3 100.00 Precincts Counted - VLG OF COLL COR -1- 1 100.00 Precincts Counted - VLG OF SEVEN MILE -2- 2 100.00 Precincts Counted - 58TH HOUSE -96- 96 100.00 Precincts Counted - 59TH HOUSE -93- 93 100.00 Precincts Counted - 60TH HOUSE -62- 62 100.00 Precincts Counted - COLL COR LO SD -1- 1 100.00 Precincts Counted - MADISON LOCAL SD -7- 7 100.00 Registered Voters - TOTAL . 187,186 Ballots Cast - TOTAL . 124,579 66.55 PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT HARRY BROWNE/JO JORGENSEN .
    [Show full text]
  • History of Electors
    STATE OF ALASKA DIVISION OF ELECTIONS History of Electors Electors for President (*indicates winning party electors for Alaska) 2020 GENERAL ELECTION ALASKA CONSTITUTION PARTY ELECTORS For President: Don Blankenship Samuel Smith, Wasilla For Vice President: Darcy Richardson Rebecca Anderson, Kenai William Topel, Anchorage ALASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ELECTORS For President: Joseph R. Biden Jr. Paul R. Kelly, Juneau For Vice President: Kamala D. Harris Frances A. Degnan, Unalakeet Cindy Spanyers, Juneau ALASKA LIBERTARIAN PARTY ELECTORS For President: Jo Jorgensen Not provided by due date For Vice President: Jeremy Cohen *ALASKA REPUBLICAN PARTY ELECTORS For President: Donald J. Trump John E. Binkley, Fairbanks For Vice President: Michael R. Pence Judy N. Eledge, Anchorage Randy A. Ruedrich, Anchorage GREEN PARTY OF ALASKA ELECTORS For President: James G. Janos Robert Shields, Fairbanks For Vice President: Cynthia McKinney Lenin Lau, Fairbanks Josh Hadley, Kotzebue ALLIANCE PARTY ELECTORS For President: Rocque De La Fuente Ross Johnston, Anchorage For Vice President: Darcy G. Richardson Marie Motschman, Anchorage Anne Begle-Shedlock, Anchorage INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT ELECTORS For President: Brock Pierce Arenza Thigpen Jr., Anchorage For Vice President: Karla Ballard Roderick A. Butler, Anchorage John Ray, Anchorage Page 1 of 9 H56 (Rev. 03/15/2021) STATE OF ALASKA DIVISION OF ELECTIONS History of Electors Electors for President (*indicates winning party electors for Alaska) 2016 GENERAL ELECTION ALASKA CONSTITUTION PARTY ELECTORS
    [Show full text]
  • Fileprod-Prc-Dc\Peoplepress\Pew Projects
    PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE PRESS OCTOBER 1996 TECHNOLOGY ON-LINE RE-INTERVIEW --TOPLINE -- October 21-31, 1996 N=1,003 Online Users Hello, I am _____ calling for Princeton Survey Research Associates in Princeton, New Jersey. Several months ago we were conducting a telephone opinion survey for leading newspapers and TV stations around the country, and we spoke with a (INSERT SEX AND AGE) in your household. I'd like to ask (HIM/HER) a few additional questions to follow up on that previous interview. Is (HE/SHE) available? IF PEW RESPONDENT DOES NOT ANSWER THE PHONE, USE THE FOLLOWING INTRODUCTION WHEN HE OR SHE DOES GET ON THE LINE: Hello, I am _____ calling for Princeton Survey Research Associates in Princeton, New Jersey. Several months ago you participated in a telephone opinion survey we were conducting for leading newspapers and TV stations around the country. I'd like to ask you a few additional questions to follow up on that previous interview. Screener to be used for all respondents: THE FIRST QUESTION IS... Q.1 Do you ever use a computer at work, school or home to connect with other computers over the Internet, with the World Wide Web, or with information services such as America Online or Prodigy? 98 Yes -- PROCEED TO Q.2 2 No -- IF RESPONDENT IS A FORMER ON-LINE USER, GO TO Q.1a; IF RESPONDENT IS A NON-ON-LINE USER, SKIP TO D.4 0 Don't know/Refused -- IF RESPONDENT IS A FORMER ON-LINE USER, GO TO Q.1a; IF RESPONDENT IS A NON-ON-LINE USER, SKIP TO D.4 100 Q.1a The last time we spoke with you, you said that you DID sometimes go online.
    [Show full text]
  • I Steptoe Toi~Nson
    STEPTOE TOI~NSONLLP I " dI ATTORWEYS AT LAW John J. OVrfy 202.429.8020 jduffv@stsptoamm March 20,2000 Lawrence Noble, Esq. General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N,W. Washington, D.C.20463 Dear Mr. Noble: We submit on behalf of the R&m Party of the USA, Pat Choate, the Chairman ofthe Reform Party, Patrick J. Ruchanan, a candidate for the Refom Party nomination for President of the United States, Bschanan Reform, the principal campaign committee of Mr. buchanan, and Angela MI. Buchanan, the enclosed Complaint concerning the actions and proposed actions of the Commission on Presidential Debates in sponsoring a series of debates between the nominees of the Republican and Democratic Parties for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States. We hope that the Commis ly to address the matters in this Complaint, since they are time semi Enclosure PHOENIX LOS ANGEES BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates COMPLAINT The Reform Party of the United States of America (the “Reform Party”), the third political party in history to qualify for federal financing of its candidates in the general election for the oflices of President and Vice President; Pat Ghoate, the Chairman of the Reform Party, and a registered voter in Virginia; Patrick J. Buchanan, a candidate for the Reform Party nomination for President of the United States, and a registered voter in Virginia; Buchanan s.= :=.. .. i :ic.. Reform, the principal campaign committee of Mr. Buchanan; and Angela M. Buchanan, a registered voter in Virginia, for herself and other registered voters (collectively the “Complainants”) file this Complaint conceming the conduct ofthe Commission on Presidential Debates (the “CPW).
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks
    23766 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 15, 1982 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS ON A VISIT TO LOS ANGELES ing message, before the delegates and You have much to be proud of, and the COUNTY BY: HIS EXCELLENCY, guests of the J ACL. country your ancestors came from is proud of your accomplishments. YOSHIO OKAW ARA, AMBASSA­ ADDRESS BY HIS EXCELLENCY YOSHIO DOR OF JAPAN TO THE 0KAWARA AMBASSADOR OF JAPAN It is in this spirit that I want to report to UNITED STATES you this evening on the present state of My wife and I cherish this opportunity to Japanese-American relations. You are enti­ be with you. As you know, I travel frequent­ tled to my candid appraisal. HON. JULIAN C. DIXON ly and widely around this vast country, meeting with a great variety of Americans It would be dishonest to pretend that OF CALIFORNIA who, in one way or another, have an inter­ there are no problems or differences what­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES est in Japanese-American relations, and are soever between our two countries. or that part of the complex fabric of mutual under­ the problems that do exist are insignificant. Wednesday, September 15, 1982 standing and cooperation, on which our The problems are real, and they are impor­ partnership rests. These are very education­ tant. At the other extreme, it would be • Mr. DIXON. Mr. Speaker, I rise to quite irresponsible to suggest that our cur­ report to the House concerning a very al and rewarding experiences for me. I was extremely impressed and delighted to find rent differences-whether in the economic unique event that took place in the so many of our friends and relatives as re­ field or over defense budgeting-are so seri­ County of Los Angeles on August 13, spected citizens of the United States and ous that they threaten the stability of the 1982 relative to this great Nation's re­ active members of local communities in vari­ Japanese-American partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Language
    Date Printed: 06/16/2009 JTS Box Number: lFES 78 Tab Number: 43 Document Title: Specimen Ballot Document Date: 1996 Document Country: United States -­ District of Columbia Document Language: English lFES ID: CE02785 Ward Ward 1 District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics 1 NOVEMBER 5, 1996 -- GENERAL ELECTION AVISO: SOUCrrE LA TRADUCCION AND ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION ELECTION DE ESTA BQLETA SPECIMEN BALLOT EN ESPANOL .---------A-CARD-------.... .---------B-CARD-------... .-----C-CARD--....... ELECTORS OF AT-LARGE AT-LARGE MEMBER ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSIONER PRESIDENT and VICE PRESIDENT MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION INITIATIVE MEASURE No. 51 OF THE UNITED STATES VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN TWO (2) VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN TWO (2) FOR VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1) "The Real Property Assessment SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT . and Tax Amendments Act" JOHN HAGELIN NATURAL VINTON "MIKE" TOMPKINS p::~. SUMMARY STATEMENT [ ] VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1) This initiative changes the real property BOB DOLE REPUB~~~~ • assessment law 10: JACK KEMP - Allow any taxpayer to challenge tax ROSS PEROT REFORM. assessments on the public's behalf, PAT CHOATE PARTY or 10 intervene in assessment ap­ peals belore the Board of Real Prop· erty Assessments and Appeals. RALPH NADER GREEN. WINONA LaDUKE PARTY - Require that all proceedings ot the Board be held in public and that all Each voter DEMOCRATIC • information presented to the Board will be issued the PARTY be publicly available. Advisory Neighborh~od JAMES E. HARRIS SOCIALIST WARD ONE MEMBER - Establish a -Public Advocate- to Commission Ballot WORKERS· OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION represent the public interest before LAURA GARZA PARTY lor the VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1) the Board and the courts on matters including but not limited to property Single Member HARRY BROWNE LIBERTARIAN • assessments; to conduct investiga­ District in which JO JORGENSEN PARTY tions; to appeal any assessments; the voter resides UNITED STATES SENATOR and to advise the public of its rights under the tax laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibetan Monks Come to New College Quigley Impresses but Jury Still out Meeting with Dean Mike
    Volume VI, Issue 9 October 29, 1996 They called me cracker and worse! TIBETAN QUIGLEY IMPRESSES BUT MONKS COME JURY STILL OUT TO NEW contributed by James Taylor ease the burden of baker Mary Joly. A COLLEGE Marriott's response to the Princeton's former employee, Charles Heathigh, was review survey designating them as "The hired for that purpose. Most importantly, by Mario Rodriguez Worst Food In The Nation" was remark­ however, Quigley has insisted on purchas­ Party animal? If the answer is yes, ably swift. Food service manager Mike ing fresh foods rather than his you might want to check out some McMee descended from Eckerd College predecessor's choice of frozen foods. wildlife of a different kind before the to oversee the operations and, more im­ "It's gotten a hell of a lot better ... Halloween PCP. portantly, damage control. [the] new manager does a few things dif­ "Wildlife, Tamed Mind: The Spirit of In the grand tradition of George ferently and suddenly vegetables aren't Tibet," a tour including twelve Tibetan Steinbrenner, the manager, Peggy mush and spaghetti isn't soup," responded monks, will perform at Sudakoff on Hendon, was replaced and New College third-year student Adam Clark to there­ Saturday, November 2 at 8:00p.m. received its third food service manager in cent hot food offerings. Admission is free for all New College as many years. "It's getting better and there are students. Her replacement, Bob Quigley, was more than five recipes being used at the The tour combines photographic im­ brought in by McAfee to improve the bot moment," added fourth-year Jason Jacobs.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA ITEM for Meeting Of- THROUGH: Johnc.S Staff
    AGENDA DOCUMENT NO. 98-22-A RECEIVED FEDERAL ELECTION GOMtilSSTH SECRETARIAT Kflfi «l 3 57 jrfi FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 March 3, 1998 MEMORANDTTM TO: The Commi AGENDA ITEM For Meeting of- THROUGH: JohnC.S Staff FROM: Lawrence M General SUBMITTED LATE N. Bradley llitchfield Associate General Co Michael Marinelli Attorney SUBJECT: OGC amendment to Draft Advisory Opinion 1998-2 Attached is a proposed amendment to the draft of the subject opinion (Agenda Document #98-22) which is to be considered by Commission at its March 5,1998 meeting. The changes macje to the draft reflect the additional information recently received from the requester concerning the number of State Reform Party affiliates that are joined to the request These are increased to 29. The changes, found on pages 5,6,8, and 9, are bolded. Attachment 2 ADVISORY OPINION 1998-2 DRAFT 3 •'...' 4 Russell J. Verney, Chairman 5 Reform Party of the United States of America 6 P.O. Box 9 7 Dallas, Texas 75221 8 9 Dear Mr. Verney: 10 11 This refers to your letter dated January 12,1998, and later supplements, requesting 12 an advisory opinion regarding whether the national committee of the Reform Party of the 13 United States of America ("the Reform Party, USA") is a "national committee" of a 14 political party for purposes of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended 15 ("the Act"), and Commission regulations. You also request the Commission to recognize 16 several State Reform parties as State committees of a political party. 17 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 18 You state that the Reform Party USA can trace its origins to 1992 and the activities 19 of most constituent State parties to a period beginning September, 1995, when, hi 20 response to numerous long-standing requests from third-party advocates, efforts to 21 establish a new national political party began.
    [Show full text]