DOCSLIB.ORG

2019Eir-SERBIA.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019Eir-SERBIA.Pdf EUROPEAN y gathering 35 local scholars, experts, and civil society activists specialized in ISLAMOPHOBIA racism and human rights, the fifth edition of theEuropean Islamophobia Report addresses a still timely and politically important issue. All 32 country reports REPORT includedB in this book follow a unique structure that is convenient, first, for comparing countries and, second, for selected readings on a particular topic such as politics, em- 2019 ployment, or education with regard to Islamophobia across Europe. The present report investigates in detail the underlying dynamics that directly or indirectly ENES BAYRAKLI • FARID HAFEZ (Eds) support the rise of anti-Muslim racism in Europe. This extends from Islamophobic state- ments spread in national media to laws and policies that restrain the fundamental rights of European Muslim citizens and threaten the whole of society. As a result, the European Islamophobia Report 2019 discusses the impact of anti-Muslim racism on human rights, multiculturalism, and the state of law in Europe. This fifth edition of our report highlights how European societies are progressively over- whelmed by the Islamophobic discourse of the “Great Replacement” and other far-right conspiracy theories. The 32 country reports demonstrate how governments and main- stream media participate in reproducing such discourses that put the fundamental rights of millions of European citizens in jeopardy and how one can counteract these developments. This compendium of useful insights and data aims to provide European policy-makers, institutions, and NGOs with recommendations on how to tackle anti-Muslim racism in Europe seriously. EUROPEAN ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT 2019 About SETA Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research (SETA) is a non-profit research ds) institute based in Turkey dedicated to innovative studies on national, regional and in- ternational issues. SETA is the leading think tank in Turkey and has offices in Ankara, Istanbul, Washington D.C., Berlin and Brussels. The objective of SETA is to produce up-to-date and accurate knowledge and analyses in the fields of politics, economy, and society, and inform policy makers and the public on changing political, economic, social, and cultural conditions. Through research reports, publications, brain storming sessions, conferences and policy recommendations, SETA seeks to guide leaders in government, civil society, and business, and contributes to informed decision making mechanisms. ENES BAYRAKLI • FARID HAFEZ (E 9 786257 040525 ANKARA • ISTANBUL • WASHINGTON D.C. • BERLIN • BRUSSELS EUROPEAN ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT 2019 ENES BAYRAKLI • FARID HAFEZ (Eds) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, without permission in writing from the publishers. ISBN: 978-625-7040-52-5 COPYRIGHT © 2020 by SETA First Published in 2020 Cover and Layout: Erkan Söğüt Proofreading: Dr. Eva Stamoulou Oral Printed in Turkey, İstanbul by Turkuvaz Haberleşme ve Yayıncılık A.Ş., SETA | FOUNDATION FOR POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Nenehatun Caddesi No: 66 GOP Çankaya 06700 Ankara TÜRKİYE Phone:+90 312.551 21 00 | Fax :+90 312.551 21 90 www.setav.org | [email protected] | @setavakfi SETA | İstanbul Defterdar Mh. Savaklar Cd. Ayvansaray Kavşağı No: 41-43 Eyüpsultan İstanbul TÜRKİYE Phone: +90 212 315 11 00 | Fax: +90 212 315 11 11 SETA | Washington D.C. 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1106 Washington, D.C., 20036 USA Phone: 202-223-9885 | Fax: 202-223-6099 www.setadc.org | [email protected] | @setadc SETA | Berlin Französische Straße 12, 10117 Berlin Germany Phone: +49 30 20188466 SETA | Brussels Avenue des Arts 27, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgique Tel: +3226520486 ABOUT EDITORS Enes Bayraklı Mr. Bayraklı earned his BA, MA and PhD from the Department of Political Sci- ence at the University of Vienna, and conducted research for his PhD thesis at the University of Nottingham in Britain between 2009 and 2010. He took office as a deputy director at Yunus Emre Turkish Cultural Center in London in 2011-2013. Mr. Bayraklı also served as the founding director of Yunus Emre Turkish Cultural Centers in Constanta and Bucharest during the period of August-December 2012. Mr. Bayraklı has been a faculty member in the Department of Political Science at the Turkish-German University since 2013. His fields of research include the Trans- formation of Turkish Foreign Policy, Cultural Diplomacy, Foreign Policy Analysis, German Politics and Foreign Policy. [email protected] Farid Hafez Farid Hafez, PhD (Political Science, University of Vienna), is a political scientist and non-resident senior researcher at Georgetown University’s “The Bridge Initiative” at the School of Foreign Service. He defended his habilitation thesis on “Islam Politics in the Second Republic of Austria” at the University of Salzburg in 2019. In 2017, he was a Fulbright visiting professor at the University of California, Berkeley and in 2014, he was a visiting scholar at Columbia University, New York. Since 2010, he has been the editor of the Islamophobia Studies Yearbook, and since 2015 the co-editor of the European Islamophobia Report. Hafez has received the Bruno Kreisky Award for the “Political Book of the Year” for his anthology Islamophobia in Austria (co-edited with John Bunzl). He has more than 100 publications in leading journals such as Politics and Religion, Patterns of Prejudice, and German Politics and Society. His latest publications are Islamophobia in Muslim Majority Societies (Routledge, co-edited with Enes Bayrakli, 2019) and Feindbild Islam. Über die Salonfähigkeit von Rassismus (Islam- ophobia. On the Acceptance of Racism. Bohlau, 2019). Email: [email protected] For more information about the EIR: www.islamophobiaeurope.com [email protected] ISLAMOPHOBIA IN SERBIA ISLAMOPHOBIA IN SERBIA NATIONAL REPORT 2019 IVAN EJUB KOSTIĆ islamophobiaeurope.com • @islamophobiaEIR 679 EUROPEAN ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT 2019 680 setav.org ISLAMOPHOBIA IN SERBIA The Author Ivan Ejub Kostić is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Political Sciences, Uni- versity of Belgrade, Serbia. He graduated from the Department of Oriental Studies, Arabic Language and Literature at the Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade. He holds a Master’s degree in Islamic Studies awarded by the same department. In the academic years 2011-2013, he was a lecturer at the Faculty of Media and Communications at Singidunum University, Belgrade, where he taught the courses “Middle Eastern Culture and History” and “Orientalism and Occidentalism.” He is one of the founders of the Balkan Centre for the Middle East, and became its managing director in 2013. He has co-authored the book Persecuted Islam (2013), and edited Religion, Belief and Civic Identity and the textbook Contemporary Islamic Thought (2019). He is a member of the editorial board of the academic periodical Journal for Religious Sciences – Kom and a regular contributor to the Yearbook of Muslims in Europe published by Brill. He is also a member of the board of the Eu- ropean Muslim Network seated in Brussels and chief editor of the regional online platform Algoritam - Contemporary Islamic Thought and Culture. Kostić has writ- ten numerous academic papers and articles in the field of Islamic studies, and is a regular contributor to leading media outlets in the country and the region on issues related to nationalism and religion, Balkan Muslims, and the Middle East and Islam. Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: Statements of fact and opinion in the national reports of the European Islamophobia Report are those of the respective authors. They are not the expression of the editors or the funding institutions. No representation, either expressed or im- plied, is made of the accuracy of the material in the national reports. The editors of the European Islamophobia Report cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The reader must make his or her own evaluation of the accuracy and appropriateness of the material. To cite this report: Ivan Ejub Kostić: Islamophobia in Serbia: National Report 2019, in: Enes Bayraklı & Farid Hafez, European Islamophobia Report 2019, Istanbul, SETA, 2020. islamophobiaeurope.com • @islamophobiaEIR 681 EUROPEAN ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT 2019 Executive Summary During 2019, the social situation in Serbia was marked by strong political instability. The main causes for this political crisis were a rise in authoritarianism by the ruling political party, increased pressure over an independent judiciary, a lack of media freedoms, widespread presence of hate speech throughout media outlets and in the general public, and the repression of opposition parties which, because of all of the above, decided in September 2019 to boycott the forthcoming 2020 parliamentary and local elections (scheduled for April 2020, according to the latest government official statements). The existence of this political crisis has been unambiguously confirmed by the European Commission, in its annual Serbia 2019 Report on the situation in the country. Additionally, a particularly negative impact on the sociopolitical situation in Serbia, and the region, has been the stagnating negotiation process between the Re- public of Serbia and the Republic of Kosovo, concerning the normalization of re- lations between the two governments. The main cause for the current deadlock has been the 2018 decision by officials in Pristina to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Testimonies of Two Former Auschwitz- Birkenau Sonderkommando Survivors: the Gabbai Brothers
    Understanding Shades of Grey: The Testimonies of Two Former Auschwitz- Birkenau Sonderkommando Survivors: The Gabbai Brothers. by SARAH JESSICA GREGORY A chapter from a larger thesis titled “Understanding Shades of Grey: The Written and Oral Testimonies of Jewish Prisoner Functionaries” submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts Honours in Modern History Macquarie University 2012 This essay focuses on two Jewish Sonderkommando members from the Nazi death camp Auschwitz-Birkenau and how they have constructed their written and oral testimonies after the Holocaust. Prisoner functionaries such as the Sonderkommando were prisoners used by the Nazis to control the everyday functioning of the labour and death camps. In return, they received “privileges,” such as more food for their cooperation. Because of this cooperation, many non-privileged prisoners viewed these prisoner functionaries as Nazi collaborators, particularly when recounting their own experiences. This made many prisoner functionaries self-impose a degree of silence for fear of judgement and retribution after the war. The Sonderkommando, for example, remained largely silent after their liberation from Allied forces because of fear of judgement and misunderstandings of their position. The Nazis used the Sonderkommando, the ‘special unit’ or squad, as forced labourers to facilitate the extermination process of the “Jewish problem.” Sonderkommando members ensured the fast-paced undressing phase of prisoners prior to their gassing, removed bodies from the gas chambers and relocated them to the furnace room or large outdoor pits for cremation; removed valuable items, hair and gold teeth, and disposed of the human ashes from the crematoriums.1 In return for this work, Sonderkommando members received greater quantities of food, better living arrangements, and more leisure time.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Politica 3-2009-A.Indd
    www.ssoar.info The paper solution: jewish emigration from Romania during the Holocaust Chioveanu, Mihai Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Chioveanu, M. (2009). The paper solution: jewish emigration from Romania during the Holocaust. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 9(3), 425-444. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445781 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de The Pa per So lu tion Jew ish Emi gra tion from Ro ma nia dur ing the Holo caust MIHAI CHIOVEANU With June 1941, the Ro ma nian gov ern ment, backed by state in sti tu tions and agen cies, turned eth nic cleansing into a top pri or ity pol icy. Dreams of a Jew free Ro ma nia (with other eth nic and re li gious mi nori ties tar geted as well) made Ion An tonescu and his hench men eas ily ac cept mass kill ing, ghet toi za tion, evacua- tions, de por ta tions, and re lo ca tions as ef fec tive geno cidal means to achieve en vi- sioned ul tra-na tion al is tic and re demp tive ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled
    The Journal of Perpetrator Research (JPR) is an Issue Editors inter-disciplinary, peer-reviewed, open access Dr Susanne C. Knittel (Utrecht University) journal committed to promoting the scholarly Dr Stéphanie Benzaquen-Gautier study of perpetrators of mass killings, political (University of Nottingham) violence, and genocide. The journal fosters scholarly discussions General Editors about perpetrators and perpetratorship across Dr Susanne C. Knittel (Utrecht University) the broader continuum of political violence. Dr Emiliano Perra (University of Winchester) JPR does not confine its attention to any Dr Uğur Ümit Üngör (Utrecht University) particular region or period. Instead, its mission is to provide a forum for analysis of perpetrators Advisory Board of genocide, mass killing and political violence Dr Stephanie Bird (UCL) via research taking place within the fields of Dr Tomislav Dulic (Uppsala University) history, criminology, law, forensics, cultural Prof. Mary Fulbrook (UCL) studies, sociology, anthropology, philosophy, Prof. Alexander L. Hinton (Rutgers University) memory studies, psychology, politics, litera- Prof. A. Dirk Moses (University of Sydney) ture, film studies and education. In providing Prof. Alette Smeulers (University of Tilburg) this interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary Prof. Sue Vice (University of Sheffield) space the journal moves academic research on Prof. James Waller (Keene State College) this topic beyond, and between, disciplinary boundaries to provide a forum in which robust Copyeditor and interrogative research and cross-curricular Sofía Forchieri (Utrecht University) discourse can stimulate lively intellectual en- gagement with perpetrators. Layout & Typesetting JPR thus not only addresses issues related Sofía Forchieri (Utrecht University) to perpetrators in the past but also responds Dr Kári Driscoll (Utrecht University) to present challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 23 November 2010 Oś—Oświęcim, People, History, Culture Magazine, No
    o ś w i ę c i M ISSN 1899-4407 PEOPLE CULTURE HISTORY no. 23 November 2010 oś—oświęcim, People, history, culture magazine, no. 23, november 2010 EDITORIAL BOARD: oś—oświęcim, People, history, culture magazine EDITORIAL November is the month during which In the November Oś, you will also tions of a participant of the program we commemorate two sad anniversa- fi nd information about online courses Why do we need tolerance? ries. November 22, 1940 the fi rst ex- prepared by the International Center We also draw your attention to a pho- ecution by fi ring squad was held in for Education about Auschwitz and to report from the Way of the Cross at Auschwitz. A year later, November the Holocaust, an article devoted to the site of the Auschwitz II-Birkenau 11—Polish Independence Day—the the visit of students and professors former concentration camp. editor: Germans held executions at the Death from Voronezh at the Center for Dia- Paweł Sawicki Wall in the courtyard of Block 11 us- logue and Prayer, and a report from Paweł Sawicki editorial secretary: ing a silenced small caliber weapon. the Polish-German seminar intended Editor-in-chief [email protected] Agnieszka Juskowiak-Sawicka We are able to recount these events for organizers of study visits to me- editorial board: now through the testimony of wit- morial sites . The pages dedicated to Bartosz Bartyzel Wiktor Boberek nesses as well as archival documents. the Jewish Center include the refl ec- Jarek Mensfelt Olga Onyszkiewicz Jadwiga Pinderska-Lech Artur Szyndler columnist: A GALLERY OF THE 20TH CENTURY Mirosław Ganobis design and layout: For the second time in this veloped in gloom seemed to up with a sudden wonder- er, it ‘emitted’ its program.
    [Show full text]
  • Yad Vashem Publications
    YAD VASHEM PUBLICATIONS Yad Vashem Publications, part of the International Institute for Holocaust Research, serves as a base for writers and researchers publishing innovative historical research, conference volumes, reference books, documents, diaries, memoirs, catalogs, and albums. Collecting, preserving and editing autobiographical accounts written by Holocaust survivors, and making them available to interested readers, enrich the knowledge on the Holocaust, contribute to the documentary aspect, and help bring an immeasurable sense of relief to the authors and their families. Social psychologists, sociologists, theologians, philosophers, writers and artists are included among the authors of Yad Vashem publications, expressing different aspects of the Holocaust experience. Yad Vashem, the world center for documentation, research, education, and commemoration of the Holocaust, is offering 35% discount off the catalog prices for libraries and educational institutions. Attached please find our 2011 catalog of publications. THE AUSCHWITZ ALBUM The Story of a Transport Editors: Israel Gutman and Bella Gutterman This album is unique in the entire world. It documents, in about two hundred photos from every direction and from every angle, the process of arrival, the enlisting, the selection, the confiscation of property and the preparation for the physical liquidation of a Jewish transport. This transport came from the area of Carpatho-Ruthenia, a region annexed in 1939 to Hungary from Czechoslovakia, and arrived at the ramp of the extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau on May 1944. The most surprising and striking fact is that the album fell into the hands of a survivor of that same death transport. Lili Jacob opened a photographic album and suddenly recognized the people of her community, who arrived with her to the platform of Birkenau: her rabbi, her numerous family relatives, and herself.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Testimonies of Resistance Nicholas Chare and Dominic Williams R
    Introduction Testimonies of Resistance Nicholas Chare and Dominic Williams R As the late director Claude Lanzmann and his editor Ziva Postec began to put some shape on the hundreds of hours of footage that he had filmed for Shoah (dir. Claude Lanzmann, France, 1985), it became clear to them that the central space around which their film should circle was the gas chamber.1 It was also clear that they could not, and should not, represent this space pictorially. Instead, it had to be evoked by testimony, that of the people who had worked around and in the chambers: the Sonderkommando (SK), or their equivalents, in Auschwitz, Chełmno and Treblinka. Lanzmann was therefore making the claim that these survivors in particular were central to an understanding of the entire period of persecution and mass murder of the Jewish people in Europe. Lanzmann’s approach placed itself in opposition to what had gone before: accounts of survival and life in the concentration camps, the use of archive footage taken by perpetrators and liberators. His new approach was to concentrate on what the witnesses of the gas chambers said, paying them closer atten- tion than they had been paid before.2 The SK had indeed been a group that had been given less consideration than might be expected. They were forced to labour at the heart of one of the killing centres of the Holocaust. At Auschwitz in particular, they witnessed, as they worked, hundreds of thousands of fellow Jews from all over Europe being brought into the crematorium buildings of Birkenau, tricked or forced into undressing and entering the gas chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Victims and Perpetrators - Documented in the Two Auschwitz Albums
    Lezing The Life of Victims and Perpetrators - documented in the two Auschwitz Albums Donderdag 24 november 2016 Universiteit Antwerpen, Stadscampus Lokaal R.013 Rodestraat 14 2000 Antwerpen Lezing in het Engels Deelname is gratis Inschrijven: www.uantwerpen.be/ijs Lezing georganiseerd door het Instituut voor Joodse Studies in samenwerking met het Museum Kazerne Dossin en de Stichting Auschwitz. The two photo collections, which were published under the titles "The First Auschwitz Album" (also known as the "Lili Meier Album") and "The Second Auschwitz Album" (also known as "Karl Höcker Album") attracted much attention. They show the dualistic world of Auschwitz-Birkenau. On the one hand there is the life of the victims, which is shown by the first album. It documents the suffering, the humiliation and the murder of the Hungarian Jews during the mass deportations and gassings in spring and summer 1944. It also depicts the consequent system of lies of the perpetrators, who did not tell their victims until the very end, what was going to happen. On the other hand the second album shows us the life of the perpetrators, who enjoyed their time at the recreation home at "Solahütte" - without any scruples or feelings of guilt. Solahütte is located only 30 kilometers away from Auschwitz-Birkenau and the Death Machinery. This emphasizes the parallel existence of two totally different worlds in extreme spatial proximity. The two albums help us to better understand the two worlds of the victims and the perpetrators. The presentation mainly deals with the aspects of humanity, moral values, historical photography and its meaning for Auschwitz as a symbol of evil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dept. of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, Copenhagen University Announces in AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU, 1942-1945 This Presenta
    The Dept. of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, Copenhagen University Announces Lecture and Discussion: Prof. Gideon Greif, When: Thursday September 27th 16.15-17.15 Where: Snorresgade U 5 THE INDUSTRIAL MASS-EXTERMINATION IN AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU, 1942-1945 Chair: Thomas Brudholm This presentation describes the mass killing process in the gas chambers and crematories of Auschwitz-Birkenau in a very detailed manner. It is accompanied by a PowerPoint presentation and by short videos showing interviews with former Jewish prisoners. Based on exclusive interviews with the last survivors of the Jewish “Sonderkommando”, who were forced to take part in the process of industrial killing in Auschwitz-Birkenau, made by the author, the presentation offers a clear vision of the mass murder in the largest extermination camp of Nazi Germany, in which about one and a half million people— most of them Jews—were murdered. The presentation reconstructs the crucial stage of ”The Final Solution”, beginning with the arrival of a transport, the ”selection”, the methods of deceit, the structure and architecture of the Gas chambers and the various tasks of the “Sonderkommando” prisoners. The lecture deals with an aspect of the Shoah that was rather unknown until now and enables the understanding of the Genocide, which was executed in Auschwitz. Gideon Greif is an Israeli historian, educator and pedagogue. He is Professor for Jewish and Israeli History at the Schusterman Center for Jewish Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. He is also Chief Historian and Researcher at the "Shem Olam Institute for Education, Documentation and Research on Faith and the Holocaust”, Israel, and at the Foundation for Holocaust Education Projects in Miami, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Between Evidence and Symbol: The Auschwitz Album in Yad Vashem, the Imperial War Museum (London) and the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum. by Jaime Ashworth Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2011 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Doctor of Philosophy BETWEEN EVIDENCE AND SYMBOL: THE AUSCHWITZ ALBUM IN YAD VASHEM, THE IMPERIAL WAR MUSEUM (LONDON) AND THE AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU STATE MUSEUM. by Jaime Ashworth This project explores the representation of the Holocaust in three museums: Yad Vashem in Jerusalem; the Imperial War Museum in London; and the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in O świ ęcim, Poland. It uses the so-called Auschwitz Album, a collection of photographs taken in Birkenau in May 1944, as a case-study.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodox Behavior and Leadership in Warsaw During the Holocaust
    chapter 18 “The Work of My Hands is Drowning in the Sea, and You Would Offer Me Song?!”: Orthodox Behavior and Leadership in Warsaw during the Holocaust Havi Dreifuss Introduction The world and religious life of observant Jews during the Holocaust have never stood at the center of Holocaust research, and in spite of decades of intensive study of the subject, there are still fundamental issues that have not been exam- ined in depth.1 Historians have rarely integrated the religious narrative into the general historical one,2 whereas works written by ultra-Orthodox authors have principally emphasized personal and religious miracle stories while ignoring other aspects of the religious confrontation with the Holocaust, thus * I would like to thank the anonymous readers of this article, whose notes helped me to improve it. My research assistant, Nir Itzik, assisted in the final stages of preparing this pub- lication, and his devoted and precise work was most helpful. Responsibility for its contents naturally remains exclusively my own. ** Reuven Ben-Shem, Yoman, Yad Vashem Archive, O.33/959, 7 Aug. 1942. The original quotation comes from a midrash dealing with the Almighty’s reaction to the angels’ desire to offer praise at the splitting of the Red Sea: ‘At that hour the ministering angels sought to sing before the Holy One, blessed be He. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to them: The work of My hands is drowning in the sea, and you would offer me song?’, Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 39b (cf. Megilah 10a). 1 Dan Michman, Ha-sho’ah ve’hekerah: hamsagah, minuah, vesugiyot yesod (Tel Aviv: Moreshet, 1998), 194; idem, ‘Ha-mehkar al orah hayav shel ha-tsibur ha-dati tahat ha-shilton ha-natsi’, in Israel Gutman and Gideon Greif (eds.), The historiography of the Holocaust period: pro- ceedings of the Fifth Yad Vashem International Historical Conference, Jerusalem, March 1983, (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1988), 742–43.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLOCAUST DENIAL Kenneth S
    HOLOCAUST DENIAL Kenneth S. Stern The American Jewish Committee New York Kenneth S. Stern is program specialist on anti-Semitism and extremism for the American Jewish Committee. The American Jewish Committeeprotects the rights andfreedoms ofJews the world over; combats bigotry and anti-Semitism andpromotes hwnan rights for all; works for the security of Israel and deepened understanding between Americans and Israe- lis; advocates public policy positions rooted in American democratic vulues and the perspectives ofthe Jewish heritagr: and enhances the creative virality of the Jewish people. Founded in 1906, it is the pioneer human-relations agency in the United States. Copyright 0 1993 The American Jewish Committeen All rights reserved Library of Congress catalog number 93-070665 ISBN 0-87495-102-X First printing April 1993 Second printing June 1993 Third printing July 1994 This publication is dedicated to the memory of Zachariah Shuster, who gave 40 years of extraordinary service to the cause of world Jewry, human rights, and Jewish-Christian understanding. He opened AJC's European office in 1948, helping thousands of Holo- caust survivors, and, later, North African Jews fleeing anti-Semi- tism, rebuild their lives. On behalf of the AJC, he had a hand in establishing the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, the passage of Nostra Aetaze-which marked a turning point in Catholic attitudes toward Jews-and the publication of German textbooks containing accurate information about Jews, Judaism, anti-Semitism, and the Holocaust. In the early 1950s, Zachariah Shuster was one of the first to speak out about the plight of Soviet Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Constructions of the Holocaust in Israeli Political Culture
    Cont Jewry (2017) 37:125–170 DOI 10.1007/s12397-017-9208-7 The Holocaust in Israeli Political Culture: Four Constructions and Their Consequences Editor’s Note: This Article is Followed by Four Comments and a Response by Ian Lustick Ian S. Lustick1 Received: 14 March 2016 / Accepted: 23 March 2017 / Published online: 24 April 2017 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 Abstract The collective memory of the Holocaust among Israeli Jews has featured competition among four related but distinct constructions: Zionist Proof-text; Wasting Asset; Object Lesson for safeguarding human rights; and Template for Jewish life. This paper will analyze this competition and the implications of the apparent victory of the Template. While there is a sequence to the changing prominence of these different versions of the Holocaust, each version has enjoyed periods of relative success since World War II. In recent decades, however, the Holocaust as a Template for Jewish Life has emerged as ascendant. Throughout, competition among the four constructions was driven by parochial and temporary political interests and by the unintended consequences of dissatisfactions associated with any one of them. My analysis will trace this competition and those conse- quences, using them to explain the extreme and highly particular features of current Israeli Jewish collective memory of the Holocaust. The paper concludes with an assessment of the implications of the hegemonic status of this version of the Holocaust for appreciating Israel’s contemporary political predicament. Keywords Israel Á Holocaust Á Political culture Á Collective memory Á Hegemony Á Constructivism & Ian S. Lustick [email protected] 1 Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 123 126 I.
    [Show full text]