Laws of Wages
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nber Working Paper Series High Discounts and High
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HIGH DISCOUNTS AND HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT Robert E. Hall Working Paper 19871 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19871 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2014 The Hoover Institution supported this research. The research is also part of the National Bureau of Economic Research's Economic Fluctuations and Growth Program. I am grateful to Jules van Binsbergen, Ian Martin, Nicolas Petrosky-Nadeau, Leena Rudanko, Martin Schneider, and Eran Yashiv for helpful comments, and to Petrosky-Nadeau for providing historical data on vacancies and helpful advice. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Robert E. Hall. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. High Discounts and High Unemployment Robert E. Hall NBER Working Paper No. 19871 January 2014 JEL No. E24,E32,G12 ABSTRACT In recessions, the stock market falls more than in proportion to corporate profit. The discount rate implicit in the stock market rises. All types of investment fall, including employers' investment in job creation. According to the leading view of unemployment—the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides model—when the incentive for job creation falls, the labor market slackens and unemployment rises. -
How Broadband Internet Affects Labor Market Matching*
How Broadband Internet Affects Labor Market Matching* Manudeep Bhuller† Andreas R. Kostøl‡ Trond C. Vigtel§ This version: December 19, 2019 Abstract: How the internet affects job matching is not well understood due to a lack of data on job vacancies and quasi-experimental variation in internet use. This paper helps fill this gap using plausibly exogenous roll-out of broadband infrastructure in Norway, and comprehensive data on recruiters, vacancies and job seekers. We document that broadband expansions increased online vacancy-postings and lowered the average duration of a vacancy and the share of establishments with unfilled vacancies. These changes led to higher job-finding rates and starting wages and more stable employment relationships after an unemployment-spell. Consequently, our calculations suggest that the steady-state unemployment rate fell by as much as one-fifth. Keywords: Unemployment; Information; Job Search; Matching. JEL codes: D83, J63, J64, L86 1 Introduction The internet has fundamentally changed the way job vacancies are matched with job seekers. Online job boards (e.g., hotjobs.com and monster.com) have lowered the cost of advertising, allowing firms to announce vacancies to a larger pool of potential applicants.1 As a result, the fraction of job seekers that use the internet for job search increased from 25 percent in 2000 to 75 percent in 2011 in the U.S. (Faberman & Kudlyak, 2016); and by 2015, nearly 70 percent of job openings were posted online (Carnevale et al., 2014). This trend is not unique to the U.S.: Figure1 illustrates that in Norway, the share of online job postings tripled in just five years starting in 2003. -
4 International Wage Curves
4 International Wage Curves David G. Blanchflower and Andrew J . Oswald This paper uses international microeconomic data to document the existenc e of an inverse relation between workers' pay and the local rate of unemploy- ment. This relation, or wage curve, is estimated for regions using data for Brit- ain, the United States, Canada, Austria, Italy, Holland, Switzerland, and Nor - way.' Evidence of an equivalent relation is presented for industries2 using data David G. Blanchflower is professor of economics at Dartmouth College and a research associat e of the National Bureau of Economic Research . He is also a research associate of the Centre fo r Economic Performance, London School of Economics . Andrew J. Oswald is a senior research fellow at the London School of Economics. This paper draws on work done for a monograph, The Wage Curve, to be published by the MIT Press. Richard Freeman, George Johnson, and Larry Katz provided valuable detailed comments . The authors also received suggestions and help from John Abowd, Fran Blau, John Bauer, Davi d Card, Bob Gregory, Alan Gustman, Bertil Holmlund, Richard Layard, John Schmitt, Denni s Snower, Bob Topel, and Steve Venti . Prakash Loungani and Larry Katz generously provided data on variables suitable for instrumenting U .S . unemployment. This work was supported by the Eco- nomic and Social Research Council (Swindon, U .K .). 1. Early British results are reported in Blanchflower and Oswald (1990) and Blanchflower, Os- wald, and Garrett (1990), which appeal to a bargaining approach without any explicit regiona l modeling. The papers give cross-sectional results for various U .K . -
The Analysis of Labor Market Efficiency: a Comparative Analysis of Maine and the United States
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College Spring 5-2018 The Analysis of Labor Market Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Maine and the United States Sarah M. Welch University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Finance Commons Recommended Citation Welch, Sarah M., "The Analysis of Labor Market Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Maine and the United States" (2018). Honors College. 361. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/361 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ANALYSIS OF LABOR MARKET EFFICIENCY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MAINE AND THE UNITED STATES by Sarah M. Welch A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (Financial Economics) The Honors College University of Maine May 2018 Advisory Committee: Andrew Crawley, Assistant Professor of Economics, Advisor James Breece, Associate Professor of Economics Angela Daley, Assistant Professor of Economics Todd Gabe, Professor of Economics Jordan LaBouff, Associate Professor of Psychology, Honors College © 2018 Sarah M. Welch All Rights Reserve ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to analyze the change in the labor market efficiency from before to after the great recession and its effect on economic output following the recession. Concerns have been raised about the adjustment of the labor market compared to the recovery of other economic indicators. Influenced by the methods of Blanchard and Diamond (1989) and Dixon et al. -
Unclassified OCDE/GD(97)231
Unclassified OCDE/GD(97)231 ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPERS No. 187 NAIRU: INCOMES POLICY AND INFLATION by Silvia Fabiani, Alberto Locarno, Gian Paolo Oneto and Paolo Sestito Most Economics Department Working Papers beginning with No. 144 are now available through OECD's Internet Web site at http://www.oecd.org/eco/eco. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Paris 60535 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ABSTRACT/RÉSUMÉ Italy has been one of the few industrial countries resorting to incomes policy in the current decade. Many Italian observers have attributed to this policy the remarkable slowdown in wage and price inflation. However, no apparent progress has been made concerning labour market unbalances, as the unemployment rate remains 4 percentage points above the already high level inherited from the 80s. This paper analyses this experience: it looks at the evidence of changes in the bargaining structure stemming from the incomes policies agreements, discusses their possible long run impact in terms of NAIRU and features of the inflationary process, presents a quantitative assessment of the specific contribution of those agreements to the inflation outcome. The analysis is carried out by looking at the presence of structural breaks in an aggregate-wage equation and resorting to counterfactual simulations of a large macroeconomic model (the Bank of Italy quarterly model). The empirical results show that the incomes policy agreements were conducive to a period of wage moderation: the absence of the incomes policy would have pushed-up consumer price inflation by 2-3 percentage points in 1996. -
Why Didn't Economists Predict the Great Depression?
Why Didn’t Economists Predict the Great Depression? Leon Taylor KIMEP Social Research Working Paper No. 6 February 2011 © Copyright 2011 Leon Taylor KIMEP Social Research Working Papers ISSN 1996 -7020 2 Why didn’t economists predict the Great Depression? Leon Taylor 1 The Department of Economics and the Office of the President Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research (KIMEP) Almaty, Kazakhstan Draft: January 2011 Version for researchers Abstract Economists failed to forecast the Great Depression, perhaps largely because they had lacked reason to theorize about business cycles. This paper tries to explain the lack of incentives. Since theory is a public good, the market produces too little of it. One non-market incentive, ex post fame, may be proportional to the value of the theory -- and thus induce more theory as its value grows. But fame comes from explaining famous events. A theory may explain a potential disaster so well as to enable policymakers to avert it. Since the event does not occur, its explainer cannot become famous. Theorists who anticipate this paradox will avoid work on the potential event; theorists who work nonetheless on events never to occur will become obscure. Another factor retarding business-cycle theory is scale economies. Learning-by-doing can induce theory by cutting its cost. Scale economies favor the first theories to be well-developed. These dealt with markets – not with business cycles – in the decades before the Depression which redirected attention to macroeconomics. ( JEL classifications: B10, E32) I. Introduction The Great Depression bemused economists of the day. “The slump in trade and employment and the business losses which are being incurred,” Keynes (1963: 148) said in 1931, “are as bad as the worst which have ever occurred in the modern history of the world.” Economists were caught off-guard. -
Japan Labor Market Trends and Our Initiatives
Japan labor market trends and our initiatives TechnoPro Holdings, Inc. March 8, 2019 Copyright © TechnoPro Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. Today's agenda 1 TechnoPro Group introduction 2 The Japanese labor market 3 Key drivers for the HR business 4 Appendix: Japanese legal revision impact Copyright © TechnoPro Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 TechnoPro Group Introduction • We have the largest provider covering the widest technical field of engineers in Japan. • We have stable growth with strong recruitment and marketing. (FY 2019 First half results 26%) ①The largest engineer base and broadest ② Strong recruitment capabilities technological domains covered in Japan utilizing various channels Transition of Recruiting more than 2,000 Engineers every year number of engineers Number of recruited engineers (mid-career+ new-graduate) 20000 17,666 3,626 14,596 13,349 overseas 2,627 2,413 2,480 2,633 15000 11,408 12,258 2,230 10,523 10,789 1,824 2,040 9,199 10000 In Japan (Japanese) 5000 In Japan 0 (non-Japanese) 2011/6 2012/6 2013/6 2014/6 2015/6 2016/6 2017/6 2018/6 2011/6 2012/6 2013/6 2014/6 2015/6 2016/6 2017/6 2018/6 * The total of recruited engineers in the Japanese subsidiaries, excluding M&A Breakdown of Assigned Engineers ③ Strong sales capabilities create broad customer base by Technological Domains (in Japan) 2,030 customers as of Jun. 2018 Contract period Sales of JPY with over 1 tn. or more 10 years 1 Electronics/SIer Listed 〇〇 2 Electronics/SIer Listed 〇〇 3 Electronics/SIer Listed 〇〇 2018/6 4 Transportation Listed 〇〇 16,057 5 Transportation Listed 〇〇 6 Transportation Listed 〇〇 7 Electronics/SIer Listed 〇〇 8 Transportation Listed 〇〇 9 Construction Non-listed 〇〇 10 Electronics Listed 〇〇 Copyright © TechnoPro Holdings, Inc. -
University of Birmingham Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis
University of Birmingham Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis Backhouse, Roger DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.326 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Backhouse, R 2015, 'Revisiting Samuelson's Foundations of Economic Analysis' Journal of Economic Literature, vol 53, no. 2, pp. 326-350. DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.326 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights When referring to this publication, please cite the published version. Copyright and associated moral rights for publications accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners. It is a condition of accessing this publication that users abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • You may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and print one copy of the publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • If a Creative Commons licence is associated with this publication, please consult the terms and conditions cited therein. • Unless otherwise stated, you may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Take down policy If you believe that this document infringes copyright please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate. Download date: 16. May. 2017 Journal of Economic Literature 2015, 53(2), 326–350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.2.326 Revisiting Samuelson’s Foundations of Economic Analysis† Roger E. -
Institutional Economics
INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Malcolm Rutherford University of Victoria (This Draft: March 2001) This paper draws on archival work using the James Bonbright Papers, J. M. Clark Papers, Joseph Dorfman Papers, Carter Goodrich Papers, Robert Hale Papers, and Wesley Mitchell Papers, all at the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University, the Arthur F. Burns Papers at the Eisenhower Library, Abilene, Kansas, and the John R. Commons Papers at the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. My thanks to Lowell Harriss, Aaron Warner, Eli Ginzberg, Donald Dewey, Mark Perlman, Daniel Fusfeld, Mark Blaug, and Walter Neale for sharing their recollections of Columbia. Thanks also to my research assistant Cristobal Young. Any errors are my responsibility. This research has been supported by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada research grant (project # 410-99-0465). 1 1. Introduction In a number of recent papers I have attempted to outline the nature of the institutionalist movement in American economics in the interwar period (Rutherford 2000a, 2000b, 2000c). At that time institutionalism was a very significant part of American economics. In terms of research output and the production of graduate students, the main centers for institutionalism were the university of Chicago (until 1926 and the departure of J. M. Clark), the University of Wisconsin, the Robert Brookings Graduate School (which existed only briefly between 1923 and 1928), and, after the arrival of Wesley Mitchell in 1913, and J. M. Clark in 1926, Columbia University. Columbia University became the academic home of a large concentration of economists of institutionalist leaning, and other Schools and Departments in the University, particularly Business, Law, Sociology, and Philosophy, also contained many people of similar or related persuasion. -
Which Workers' Wages Track Productivity? the Role of Position
Which Workers' Wages Track Productivity? The Role of Position Specificity and On-the-Job Search Justin Bloesch & Bledi Taska September 30, 2020 Abstract Which workers' wages track productivity regardless of the state of the labor market? Evidence suggests that wages for workers in high-wage occupations (i) have been relatively stable across the business cycles over the last two recessions and recoveries, and (ii) covary systematically with firm characteristics such as productivity or firm size. Conversely, wages in low-wage occupations have comoved more with labor market slack over the last two business cycles, and a broad literature suggests that firm characteristics, such as size or productivity, no longer have a significant relationship with wages in low- wage jobs. In this paper, we introduce a concept of position specificity to explain these differential wage patterns across occupations. Using online job posting data from Burning Glass Technologies, we construct a measure of position specificity based on jobs' posted skill requirements, using a clustering algorithm to identify occupations in which jobs are highly differentiated in their tasks from other jobs within the firm. Next, we develop a model with worker-position skill specificity and on-the-job search that can rationalize the above observations. This is achieved without imposing exogenous heterogeneity in worker bargaining power, while remaining consistent with a range of recent findings about wage setting and recruiting behavior that have challenged other popular models. We document the differential sensitivity of wages in low-wage occupations to labor market slack over the last two business cycles, and we offer preliminary evidence that position specificity may better account for these wage patterns than an occupation's relative wage. -
The Wage Equation
The wage equation. Olivier Blanchard * April 1998 A central equation in the models we have used so far has been the wage relation, the relation between the wage set in bargaining between firms and workers, and labor market conditions. The purpose of this note is to review the state of our (limited) empirical knowledge on this topic. 1 Empirical wage equations Start with the standard characterization of the joint behavior of wage inflation, price inflation, and unemployment in U.S. macroeconometric models. Standard macroeconometric models determine the natural rate through two equations, a “price equation” and a ‘&wage equation” In their simplest form, the equations can be written as: AlogPt = a,+AlogWt+~,t (1.1) AlogWt = a,+AlogPt-I -Pw+~t (1.2) * Prepared for Lecture 9, Econ 2410d UnemDlovment 2 where P is the price index, W is the nominal wage, so that A log P and A log W are price and wage inflation respectively, ‘LL is the unemployment rate, up and a, are constants, and Q, and E, are error terms. Eliminating wage inflation between the two, these equations yield the (expectations-augmented) “Phillips curve” relation between the change in infla- tion and the unemployment rate: A log Pt = a + A log Pt-l - Put + et where a = up + awr and ct = EWt + Ept. The natural rate of unemployment is then taken to be the rate of unemployment consistent with constant (non-accelerating) inflation in this Phillips curve equa- tion. The first three columns of Table 1 (taken from Blanchard and Katz [ 19971) report the results of estimating these relations using annual U.S. -
Econometrics, Practice Questions, ECO54 Udayan Roy These Questions Are Based on Chapter 11 of the Ordinary Business of Life by R
Econometrics, Practice Questions, ECO54 Udayan Roy These questions are based on chapter 11 of The Ordinary Business of Life by Roger Backhouse and Chapter 16 of History of Economic Thought, Fourth Edition, by Harry Landreth and David Colander. The latter item was distributed as a handout in class. If you do not have it, please pick up your copy from the economics department’s offices. 1. On the issue of using observed facts to test economic theories, which of the following is correct? a. Most economists believe that their theories of how the economy works must be tested against real-world events and data. However, there is more disagreement on the proper procedure for the use of data to test theories. b. Few economists believe that their theories of how the economy works must be tested against real-world events and data. However, most economists agree on the proper procedure for the use of data to test theories, if such testing is done. c. As economists generally cannot do controlled experiments to test their theories, most economists believe that it is futile to try to use real-world data to test their theories. d. Most economists believe that their theories of how the economy works must be tested against real-world events and data. Most economists agree that the only proper procedure for such testing is to run controlled experiments. 2. According to Ragnar Frisch, a Norwegian economist who became a pioneer of the subject, econometrics a. Is the expression of economic theory in mathematical terms b. Refers to the collection of data to describe an economy quantitatively c.