_____________________ Région et Développement n° 38-2013 __________________ THE WAGE CURVE RECONSIDERED: IS IT TRULY AN 'EMPIRICAL LAW OF ECONOMICS'? Bernard FINGLETON*, Silvia PALOMBI ** Abstract - The negative relationship between wages and unemployment, embod- ied within the so-called wage curve, has an extensive literature and has been referred to as ‘an empirical law of economics’. However there are newer alter- native theories that seek to explain the variation in wages without reference to unemployment rates, namely Urban Economics (UE) and New Economic Geog- raphy (NEG). The present paper considers the relative success of non-nested models of wage determination from the perspective of Great Britain’s 408 local authorities over the period 1998-2010. Key-words: WAGE CURVE, EMPLOYMENT DENSITY, MARKET POTEN- TIAL, SPATIAL PANEL DATA ECONOMETRICS, NON-NESTED MODELS, SPATIAL J-TEST JEL Classification: C23, C52, J30, J40, J63, O18, R11, R12 * Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK;
[email protected] ** Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, Sir William Duncan Building, 130 Rottenrow, Glasgow G4 0GE, UK;
[email protected] 50 Bernard Fingleton, Silvia Palombi 1. INTRODUCTION Since Blanchflower and Oswald’s seminal paper on The Wage Curve (Blanchflower and Oswald, 1990), a wealth of international research has emerged on the responsiveness of wages to changes in local labour market con- ditions. In most cases, an unemployment elasticity of pay of around -0.10 has been found; given its uniformity across countries and its stability over time, the wage curve has been referred to as an ‘empirical law of economics’ (Card, 1995).