DOCSLIB.ORG

Decision of the Council Revising the OECD Schemes for the Varietal Certification Or the Control of Seed Moving in International Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Decision of the Council Revising the OECD Schemes for the Varietal Certification or the Control of Seed Moving in International Trade 8 OECD Legal Instruments This document is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. It reproduces an OECD Legal Instrument and may contain additional material. The opinions expressed and arguments employed in the additional material do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD Member countries. This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Note by Turkey The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. For access to the official and up­to-date texts of OECD Legal Instruments, as well as other related information, please consult the Compendium of OECD Legal Instruments at http://legalinstruments.oecd.org. Please cite this document as: OECD, Decision of the Council Revising the OECD Schemes for the Varietal Certification or the Control of Seed Moving in International Trade, OECD/LEGAL/0308 Series: OECD Legal Instruments © OECD 2021 This document is provided free of charge. It may be reproduced and distributed free of charge without requiring any further permissions, as long as it is not altered in any way. It may not be sold. This document is available in the two OECD official languages (English and French). It may be translated into other languages, as long as the translation is labelled "unofficial translation" and includes the following disclaimer: "This translation has been prepared by [NAME OF TRANSLATION AUTHOR] for informational purpose only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed by the OECD. The only official versions are the English and French texts available on the OECD website http://legalinstruments.oecd.org" _____________________________________________________________________________________________OECD/LEGAL/0308 3 Background Information The Decision Revising the OECD Schemes for the Varietal Certification or the Control of Seed Moving in International Trade was adopted by the OECD Council on 28 September 2000 on the proposal of the Committee for Agriculture. The Decision establishes a common set of basic principles and methods of operation for the seven groups of species constituting the OECD Seed Schemes. The objectives of the Schemes are to encourage the use of seed of consistently high quality in Adherent countries. The Schemes authorise the use of labels and certificates for seed produced and processed for international trade according to agreed principles ensuring varietal identity and purity.The Schemes facilitate the import and export of seed, by the removal of technical barriers to trade through internationally recognised labels (“passports” for trade). They also lay down guidelines for seed multiplication abroad, as well as for the delegation of some control activities to the private sector (“authorisation”). The COVID-19 crisis created specific problems for the seed sector due to the reduced availability and increased cost of transport, shortage of personnel, and a contraction in the market for plants and seeds. Despite these challenges, the international seed production and distribution system remained resilient thanks to the efforts of governments and stakeholders in the seed value chain. In order to continue to maintain sufficient seed supply during the crisis, governments and national designated authorities (NDAs) need to continue to implement specific measures. The classification of the agriculture sector as “essential” is important for the continued movement of seed and for employees to carry on their work. Avoiding changes to the regulatory framework and technical barriers to trade is critical at a time when the relevant authorities are short staffed and under pressure. The maintenance of seed quality is important to ensure good crop production and high yields. As such, instead of introducing derogative measures to the Decision, NDAs are allowing its flexible implementation. Communication, collaboration and harmonisation of measures among the relevant national authorities and border controls is critical. For more information, see : Policy responses to COVID-19 in the seed sector _____________________________________________________________________________________________4 OECD/LEGAL/0308 THE COUNCIL, HAVING REGARD to Article 5 a) and c) of the Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development of 14 December 1960; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 10 October l988 Revising the OECD Scheme for the Varietal Certification of Herbage and Oil Seed Moving in International Trade [C(88)68(Final)], amended on 19 March 1991 [C(91)19/FINAL], 19 May 1992 [C(92)53/FINAL], 2 December 1993 [C(93)119/FINAL], 27 December 1993 [C(93)120/FINAL], 20 July 1995 [C(95)113/FINAL], 14 September 1995 [C(95)161/FINAL], 16 December 1996 [C(96)173/FINAL] and 13 July 1999 [C(99)70/FINAL]; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 10 October l988 Revising the OECD Scheme for the Varietal Certification of Cereal Seed Moving in International Trade [C(88)69(Final)], amended on 24 September 1990 [C(90)80/FINAL], 19 March 1991 [C(91)19/FINAL], 20 July 1995 [C(95)113/FINAL], 14 September 1995 [C(95)161/FINAL] and 13 July 1999 [C(99)70/FINAL]; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 10 October l988 Revising the OECD Scheme for the Varietal Certification of Sugar Beet and Fodder Beet Seed Moving in International Trade [C(88)66(Final)], amended on 19 March 1991 [C(91)19/FINAL], 20 July 1995 [C(95)113/FINAL], 14 September 1995 [C(95)161/FINAL] and 13 July 1999 [C(99)70/FINAL]; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 10 October 1988 Revising the OECD Scheme for the Varietal Certification of Seed of Subterranean Clover and Similar Species Moving in International Trade [C(88)70(Final)], amended on 19 March 1991 [C(91)19/FINAL], 20 July 1995 [C(95)113/FINAL], 14 September 1995 [C(95)161/FINAL] and 13 July 1999 [C(99)70/FINAL]; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 10 October 1988 Revising the OECD Scheme for the Varietal Certification of Maize and Sorghum Seed Moving in International Trade [C(88)67(Final)], amended on 19 March 1991 [C(91)19/FINAL], 3 June 1993 [C(93)51/FINAL], 2 December 1993 [C(93)121/FINAL], 20 July 1995 [C(95)113/FINAL], 14 September 1995 [C(95)161/FINAL] and 13 July 1999 [C(99)70/FINAL]; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 16 March 1971 Establishing the OECD Scheme for the Control of Vegetable Seed Moving in International Trade [C(71)31(Final)], amended on 24 October 1974 [C(74)197], 24 June 1976 [C(76)133], 14 June 1977 [C(77)121], 19 March 1991 [C(91)19/FINAL], 20 July 1995 [C(95)113/FINAL], 14 September 1995 [C(95)161/FINAL] and 13 July 1999 [C(99)70/FINAL]; HAVING REGARD to the Decision of the Council of 28 September 2000 Revising the OECD Schemes for the Varietal Certification or the Control of Seed Moving in International Trade [C(2000)146/FINAL and C/M(2000)22/PROV], as amended 22 June 2001 [C(2001)101 and C/M(2001)14/PROV, C(2001)100 and C/M(2001)14/PROV], 29 November 2001 [C(2001)264 and C/M(2001)23/PROV, C(2001)266 and C/M(2001)23/PROV, C(2001)265 and C/M(2001)23/PROV], 22 January 2002 [C(2001)288 and C/M(2002)2/PROV], 26 February 2003 [C(2003)18 and C/M(2003)4/PROV], 1 April 2003 [C(2003)23 and C/M(2003)8/PROV], 4 June 2004 [C(2004)97 and C/M(2004)14/PROV], 24 January 2005 [C(2004)210 and C/M(2005)2/PROV], 29 April 2005 [C(2005)38 and C/M(2005)12/PROV], 21 December 2005 [C(2005)170 and C/M(2006)1/PROV, C(2005)169 and C/M(2006)1/PROV, C(2005)171 and C/M(2006)1/PROV], 14 April 2006 [C(2006)53 and C/M(2006)8/PROV], 11 May 2006 [C(2006)71 and C/M(2006)9/PROV, C(2006)75 and C/M(2006)11/PROV], 30 March 2007 [C(2007)12 and C/M(2007)5/PROV], 14 November 2007 [C(2007)122 and C/M(2007)15/PROV, C(2007)123 and C/M(2007)15/PROV], 29 November 2007 [C(2007)128 and C/M(2007)17/PROV], 16 October 2008 [C(2008)120 and C/M(2008)18/PROV], 23 October 2008 [C(2008)150 and C/M(2008)19/PROV, C(2008)151 and C/M(2008)19/PROV], 30 October 2008 [TAD/CA(2008)17], 10 November 2008 [TAD/CA(2008)28], 20 November 2008 [TAD/CA(2008)30], 3 February 2009 [C(2008)153 and C/M(2009)3/PROV, C(2008)152 and C/M(2009)3/PROV], 10 September 2009 [TAD/CA(2009)6], 16 November 2009 [C(2009)155 and C/M(2009)22/PROV], 02 November 2010 [C(2010)133 and C/M(2010)20/PROV], 23 March 2012 [TAD/CA(2012)2], 2 November 2012 [TAD/CA(2012)13], 19 December 2014 [C(2014)154 and C/M(2015)1], 31 July 2015 [C(2015)103 and C/M(2015)18], 16 December 2015 [TAD/CA(2015)15], 23 December 2015 [C(2015)171 and C/M(2016)1], 29 November 2016 [TAD/CA(2016)27], 23 December 2016 [C(2016)177 and C/M(2017)2], 17 November 2017 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________OECD/LEGAL/0308 5 [TAD/CA(2017)17], 22 December 2017 [C(2017)143 and C/M(2018)2], 30 January 2019 [C(2019)2 and C/M(2019)4, 29 January 2020 [TAD/CA(2019)7 and C(2020)4 ]; On the proposal of the Committee for Agriculture; I.
Recommended publications
  • ARCHAEOBOTANY in GREECE Alexandra Livarda, Department Of

    ARCHAEOBOTANY in GREECE Alexandra Livarda, Department Of

    ARCHAEOBOTANY IN GREECE Alexandra Livarda, Department of Archaeology, University of Nottingham, UK The final version of this paper can be found in the following publication: Livarda, A. 2014. Archaeobotany in Greece. Archaeological Reports 60: 106-116. This paper provides a brief overview of the history and the main achievements of archaeobotanical work in Greece to date, with the aim of highlighting its potential and creating a framework in which future work can be contextualised. The term ‘archaeobotany’ is used here in its narrow sense, referring to the study of plant macroremains, such as seeds, fruits and other plant parts, and excluding charcoal studies or ‘anthracology’ and analyses of microremains (e.g. pollen, phytoliths), which have developed to become separate sub-disciplines. From the first finds to a science Plant remains in the form of large concentrations of seeds, or individual finds of large specimens (known as spot finds), such as fruit stones, have been reported in the archaeological literature since the end of the nineteenth century. Botanical specimens that were occasionally unearthed caught the attention of archaeologists and site directors, who would either invite botanists or other experts to identify the species, or would simply rely on the expertise of the archaeological team, including that of local workers. A rather widely reported case is that of the early excavations at Knossos, where local workmen identified seeds found in a pithos as ‘Egyptian beans’, a variety of small fava beans imported to Crete from Alexandria at the end of the nineteenth century (Evans 1901, 20–21). At the other end of the spectrum, Schliemann (1886, 93), for instance, sent samples of the masses of burnt grains encountered in the early levels of Tiryns to an expert, Professor L.
  • COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the Marketing Of

    COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the Marketing Of

    20.7.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 193/33 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, (8) Rules established at international level should be taken into account for certain provisions relating to the approval of varieties at national level. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 thereof, (9) In order to carry out the examinations for the acceptance of a variety, a large number of uniform Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, criteria and minimum requirements must be laid down. 1 Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament ( ), (10) Provisions relating to the length of time during which acceptance of a variety is to remain valid, the grounds on which acceptance may be revoked and the practices Having consulted the Economic and Social Committee, for maintenance of the variety must be standardized. Member States should inform one another of the acceptance and withdrawal of varieties. Whereas: (11) It is desirable to adopt rules in relation to the suitability (1) Council Directive 70/458/EEC of 29 September 1970 of varietal denominations and for the exchange of on the marketing of vegetable seed (2) has been information between the Member States. frequently and substantially amended (3). For reasons of clarity and rationality the said Directive should be codified. (12) Seed of varieties listed in the common catalogue of varieties should not be subject within the Community to (2) The production of vegetable seed occupies an important any marketing restrictions relating to variety.
  • Ecogeographic, Genetic and Taxonomic Studies of the Genus Lathyrus L

    Ecogeographic, Genetic and Taxonomic Studies of the Genus Lathyrus L

    ECOGEOGRAPHIC, GENETIC AND TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF THE GENUS LATHYRUS L. BY ALI ABDULLAH SHEHADEH A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham March 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Lathyrus species are well placed to meet the increasing global demand for food and animal feed, at the time of climate change. Conservation and sustainable use of the genetic resources of Lathyrus is of significant importance to allow the regain of interest in Lathyrus species in world. A comprehensive global database of Lathyrus species originating from the Mediterranean Basin, Caucasus, Central and West Asia Regions is developed using accessions in major genebanks and information from eight herbaria in Europe. This Global Lathyrus database was used to conduct gap analysis to guide future collecting missions and in situ conservation efforts for 37 priority species. The results showed the highest concentration of Lathyrus priority species in the countries of the Fertile Crescent, France, Italy and Greece.
  • <I>Onobrychis Avajensis</I> (Fabaceae)

    <I>Onobrychis Avajensis</I> (Fabaceae)

    Plant Ecology and Evolution 143 (2): 170–175, 2010 doi:10.5091/plecevo.2010.431 REGULAR PAPER Meiotic chromosome number and behaviour of Onobrychis avajensis (Fabaceae): a new species from western Iran Massoud Ranjbar*, Roya Karamian & Saeydeh Afsari Department of Biology, Herbarium Division, Bu-Ali Sina University, P.O. Box 65175/4161, Hamedan, Iran *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Background and aims – The present study is focused on the cytogenetic and morphological criteria allowing to distinguish a new taxon from Onobrychis sect. Heliobrychis. This section is the largest section in O. subg. Sisyrosema represented with 21 species in Iran. The new species belongs to the O. subsect. Boissierianae characterized by perennial plants with well-developed stems and O. andalanica group with uniformely yellow corolla. Methods – The morphological features and meiotic chromosome number and behaviour were studied in O. avajensis Ranjbar. Key results – The novelty Onobrychis avajensis Ranjbar, endemic to Iran, is described and illustrated from two collections from a single locality between Avaj and Abgram in Qazvin Province in the west Zagros. It is closely related to O. andalanica Bornm. but differs from it in a few morphological characters. In addition, meiotic chromosome number and behaviour were studied in O. avajensis. This report is the first cytogenetic analysis of this taxon. O. avajensis is a diploid plant and possesses 2n = 2x = 16 chromosomes, consistent with the proposed base number of x = 8. The general meiotic behaviour of the species was regular, with bivalent pairing and normal chromosome segregation at meiosis. Meiotic abnormalities were observed included a varying degree of sticky chromosomes with laggards, precocious division of centromeres in metaphase I, bridges in anaphase I and multipolar cells in telophase II.
  • Poisoning of Tained 1N Human Beings by Weeds Con- (Bread Poisoning.)

    Poisoning of Tained 1N Human Beings by Weeds Con- (Bread Poisoning.)

    Onderstepo01·t Journal of Veterinary Science and A.111:mal I ndustry, Vol'ume I, Number 1. 1933. Poisoning of Human Beings by Weeds con­ tained 1n Cereals (Bread Poisoning.) By D. G. STEYN, B.Sc., Dr. Med. Vet., Veterinary Research Officer, Onderste­ poort. I. INTRODUCTION. '''II. PLANTS DISCUSSED IK THIS ARTICLE :­ A. Borraginaeeae. Lithospermum arvense L. B. Caryophyllaceae. (a) Ag1·ostemma Githayo L. (b) Silene gallica L. C. Compositae. (a) Centaurea picris DC. x(b) Senecio arenarius Thunb. x(c) Seneciv Bu1·chellii DC. x(d) Senecio ilicifolius Thunb. x(e) Senecio isatideus DO. x(j) Senecio laevigat1.ts Thnnb. x(g) Senecio rigidus L. x(h) Senecio rosma.rinifolius L . f. D. Cruciferae. (a) Raphanus raphanistrum L. E. Euphorbiaceac. (a) Euphorbia helioscopia L. (b) Eupho1·bia pepl1.ts L. (c) Ricinus communis L. F. Graminae. Loliv.m terrmlentum L. G. Legnminosae. Yicia sativa L . H. Polygonaceae. Rumex Acetosella L. * Only those plants marked with an x are indigenous. 219 POISONING BY WEEDS CONTATNED IN CEREALS. I. Solanaceae. (a) Datura Stramon·ium L. (b) Datum Tatula L. III. LEGAL ASPECT. TV. DISCUSSION. A. Plants Concerned in Bread Poisoning and in Poisoning by other Foodstuffs Cultivated on Lands. B. }.._re Senecio spp. Concerned in the so-called " Bread Poisoning " in Human Beings. C. Circumstances favouring Bread Poisoning. D. Effect of the Process of Preparation of Bread on the Toxicity of Weeds Contaminating the ::V1ea1. E. The Cause of Death in Senecio Poisoning. v. SUM:\fARY. VI. AcKNowr.EDGENIENTs. VII. LITERATURE. I. INTRODUCTION. fn this article the term " bread poisoning" signifies poisoning caused by the ingestion of bread prepared from wheat contaminated with extraneous seeds.
  • A List of Oxfordshire Rare Plants in Alphabetical Order

    A List of Oxfordshire Rare Plants in Alphabetical Order

    Oxfordshire Rare Plant Register, all species studied, in alphabetical order, 28 April 2015 National Status Oxfordshire status (not complete) Latin name English name (not vice-county) Least Concern Adiantum capillus-veneris Maidenhair Fern RPR Endangered Adonis annua Pheasant’s-eye RPR Waiting List Aethusa cynapium ssp. agrestis Fool's Parsley Not studied Waiting List Agrostemma githago Corn Cockle Introd since 1992 Least Concern Agrostis canina Velvet Bent RPR Least Concern Agrostis curtisii Bristle Bent RPR Least Concern Agrostis vinealis Brown Bent RPR Least Concern Aira caryophyllea Silver Hair-grass RPR Least Concern Aira praecox Early Hair-grass RPR Least Concern Alchemilla filicaulis Hairy Lady’s-mantle RPR Least Concern Alchemilla xanthochlora Pale Lady's-mantle Last in 1988 Least Concern Alisma lanceolatum Narrow-leaved Water-plantain RPR Least Concern Alopecurus aequalis Orange Foxtail RPR Vulnerable Anacamptis morio Green-winged Orchid RPR Data Deficient Anagallis foemina Blue Pimpernel RPR Least Concern Anagallis tenella Bog Pimpernel RPR Introduced since 1500 Anisantha madritensis Compact Brome Introduced Endangered Anthemis arvensis Corn Chamomile RPR Vulnerable Anthemis cotula Stinking Chamomile Not studied Least Concern Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil RPR Introduced since 1500 Apera interrupta Dense Silky-bent RPR Least Concern Apera spica-venti Loose Silky-bent RPR Least Concern Aphanes australis Slender Parsley-piert RPR Least Concern Apium graveolens Wild Celery RPR Vulnerable Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort RPR Europe Protected Apium repens Creeping Marshwort RPR Least Concern Aquilegia vulgaris Columbine Not Scarce Near Threatened Arabis hirsuta Hairy Rock-cress RPR Introduced since 1500 Aristolochia clematitis Birthwort RPR Iconic Extinct in the Wild Arnoseris minima Lamb's Succory Last in 1971 Least Concern Artemisia absinthium Wormwood RPR Least Concern Arum italicum ssp.
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants

    Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants

    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
  • COVER CROPS and SOIL-BORNE FUNGI DANGEROUS TOWARDS the CULTIVATION of SALSIFY (Tragopogon Porrifolius Var

    COVER CROPS and SOIL-BORNE FUNGI DANGEROUS TOWARDS the CULTIVATION of SALSIFY (Tragopogon Porrifolius Var

    Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 10(2) 2011, 167-181 COVER CROPS AND SOIL-BORNE FUNGI DANGEROUS TOWARDS THE CULTIVATION OF SALSIFY (Tragopogon porrifolius var. sativus (Gaterau) Br.) Elbieta Patkowska, Mirosaw Konopiski University of Life Sciences in Lublin Abstract. Salsify has a remarkable taste and nutritious values. It is a rich source of inulin – a glycoside which has a positive effect on human and animal organisms. The paper pre- sents studies on the species composition of soil-borne fungi infecting the roots of Tragopogon porrifolius var. sativus cultivated with the use of oats, tansy phacelia and spring vetch as cover crops. In a field experiment the cover crops formed abundant green mass before winter and it constituted a natural mulch on the surface of the plough land. It was managed in two ways: 1) mixed with the soil as a result of spring ploughing, or 2) mixed with the soil as a result of pre-winter ploughing. The conventional cultivation of salsify, i.e. without cover crops, constituted the control. The studies established the number and health status of four-week-old salsify seedlings and roots with necrotic signs. A laboratory mycological analysis made it possible to determine the quantitative and qualitative composition of fungi infecting the underground parts of Tragopogon porri- folius var. sativus. The emergences and the proportion of infected salsify seedlings varied and depended on the species of the mulching plant. The smallest number of infected seed- lings was obtained after the mulch with oats, slightly more after the application of spring vetch or tansy phacelia as cover crops, and the most in the control.
  • Onobrychis Viciifolia) As a Rangeland Forage Crop in California Ceci Dale-Cesmat, State Rangeland Management Specialist and Margaret Smither-Kopperl, PMC Manager

    Onobrychis Viciifolia) As a Rangeland Forage Crop in California Ceci Dale-Cesmat, State Rangeland Management Specialist and Margaret Smither-Kopperl, PMC Manager

    FINAL STUDY REPORT Lockeford Plant Materials Center, Lockeford, CA Sainfoin Seeding Trials 2012 – 2014 Suitability of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) as a Rangeland Forage Crop in California Ceci Dale-Cesmat, State Rangeland Management Specialist and Margaret Smither-Kopperl, PMC Manager ABSTRACT Landowners in the Sacramento Valley had requested a seeding trial of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) to determine the long-term survival of three different cultivars (Eski, Remont and Shoshone) in Major Land Resource Area 17 (Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys). Sainfoin is currently used as a non- bloat hay/pasture and rangeland forage species to increase the protein content of the sward. The objective of this project was to study the persistence of Sainfoin and its ability to survive California’s hot summer conditions. To provide seeding and cultivar recommendations to be accessed by the eVegGuide, and include management practices to maintain its persistence. Seeds were planted in plots that were clean cultivated in the fall of 2012. Plantings were direct seeded using a Truax range drill. Seeding rates were 34 lbs/acre for all three Sainfoin cultivars, 8 lbs/acre for Orchardgrass/Sainfoin plots and 10 lbs/ac for Purple Needlegrass/Sainfoin plots. Seed was planted at ¼ inch. There was a 10’ break between Sainfoin treatments which were seeded in the plots in a north/south direction, and replicated three times in an irrigated and non-irrigated split plot design. Grass seed was planted in an east/west direction as was alfalfa, which was used as a control plot. Three years of data collection showed that all three varieties of Sainfoin survivorship was poor in MLRA 17.
  • Inf.9 Proposal from Germany

    Inf.9 Proposal from Germany

    INF.9 PROPOSAL FROM GERMANY This proposal reflects the wish of delegates expressed during the 56 th session of the Specialized Section: – to elaborate a standard for root vegetables other than carrots, – to include the tubercle vegetables. The intention of this standard for root and tubercle vegetables is, to integrate the existing UNECE standards for scorzonera (FFV-33), horse-radish (FFV-20), and radishes (FFV-43). Thus, while approving this draft standard as new UNECE standard, these standards should be withdrawn. UNECE STANDARD FFV-No concerning the marketing and commercial quality control of ROOT AND TUBERCLE VEGETABLES 1 I. DEFINITION OF PRODUCE This standard applies to root and tubercle vegetables of varieties (cultivars) grown from the following species to be supplied fresh to the consumer, root and tubercle vegetables for industrial processing being excluded: – beet tubercle ( Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris var. vulgaris und var. lutea DC.), – celeriac ( Apium graveolens L. var. rapaceum (Mill.) Gaudin), – Hamburg parsley ( Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nyman ex A. W. Hill var. tuberosum (Bernh.) Mart Crov.), – horse-radish ( Armoracia rusticana Gottfr. Gaertn., B. Mey. et Scherb.), – kohlrabi, cabbage turnip (Brassica olearacea var. gongylodes L.) – parsnips ( Pastinaca sativa L.), – radishes ( Raphanus sativus L. var. sativus ), – radishes ( Raphanus sativus var. niger (Mill.) J. Kern.). – salsify ( Tragopogon porrifolius L. ssp. porrifolius ), – scorzonera ( Scorzonera hispanica L.), – swede ( Brassica napus L. (Napobrassica-group)), – turnips ( Brassica rapa L. (Rapa-group)), – turnip-rooted chervil or bulbous chervil ( Chaerophyllum bulbosum L.), – root and tubercle vegetables of other species and any hybrids. II. PROVISIONS CONCERNING QUALITY 1 Note: For carrots ( Daucus carota L.) the UNECE standard FFV-10 applies.
  • 3-Web SC Plant List

    3-Web SC Plant List

    Wild Plants of Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area Grouped by Growth Form Alphabetical by Scientific Name September 5, 2003 Wild Plants of Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area Grouped by Growth Form Alphabetical by Scientific Name This document contains a comprehensive list of the wild plants reported to be found in Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area. The plants are grouped according to their growth form for easy accessibility. These four groups are: Ferns & Horsetails, Grasses & Grasslike, Herbaceous, and Woody. The plants within each group are listed alphabetically by scientific name. Other information on each plant includes the common name, family, whether the plant is native or introduced, and its longevity. For quick reference, the upper left corner of each page displays both the group name (based on growth form) and the genus of the first scientific name. The abbreviations used: Checklist column for marking off the plants you observe Scientific Name According to The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, 1993 Common Name According to Jepson and other references (highly variable) Family The scientific plant family name according to Jepson L Longevity: Annual (a), Biennial (b), Perennial (p), or a combination N/I Native (n) or Introduced (i) according to Jepson The listing of plants included in this document is by no means complete. The intent is to maintain an ongoing inventory to which additional plants can be added over time. Readers are encouraged to report any corrections or additions to this list by emailing the District Botanist (Wilde Legard, [email protected]). This welcomed assistance will help facilitate improved management of the Park District’s natural resources.