DOCSLIB.ORG

IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas: User Manual, Version 1.2 St the Global Standard for Protected Areas in the 21 Century

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas: User Manual, Version 1.2 St the Global Standard for Protected Areas in the 21 Century IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas: User Manual, Version 1.2 The global standard for protected areas in the 21st Century User Manual: IUCN Green List Programme User Manual for the IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas Version 1.2 Effective from 01 March 2019 How to apply the IUCN Green List Standard (Version 1.1) to track, improve and verify the performance of Protected and Conserved Areas 2 User Manual: IUCN Green List Programme The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of other participating organisations. This publication has been made possible in part by funding from the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety under the International Climate Initiative (IKI), on the basis of a decision adopted by the German Bundestag. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2019 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: IUCN, World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) and Assurance Services International (ASI) (2019). IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas: User Manual, Version 1.2. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Cover Photos (top left, clockwise): 1. “Jack” the mahout, Surani, Thailand. ©Brent Stirton, Getty Images. 2. Manuai Matawai depicts Pere Locally Managed Marine Area during a participatory 3D modelling event on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea. ©James Hardcastle 3. IUCN Green List event at Hawai’i World Conservation Congress 2016. ©Dao Nguyen. 4. ‘Nima’, pastoralist and guardian of a community conserved area near Dege, China. ©James Hardcastle. The official language of this document is English. The definitive version is maintained on www.iucn.org/greenlist. Any discrepancy between copies, versions or translations shall be resolved by reference to the definitive English version. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000, Fax +41 22 999 0002 www.iucn.org/greenlist [email protected] 3 User Manual: IUCN Green List Programme Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 Glossary ................................................................................................................. 17 1 The IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas Standard ........... 25 1.2 Work programme for the IUCN Green List Standard development ............... 27 1.3 Conducting stakeholder consultation ........................................................... 28 1.4 Incorporating stakeholder feedback and further drafting .............................. 29 1.5 Drafting Generic Indicators .......................................................................... 30 1.6 Approving the IUCN Green List Standard and its Generic Indicators ........... 30 1.7 IUCN Green List Standard and Generic Indicator review and revision ......... 31 2 Adapting the Generic Indicators .................................................................. 32 2.1 Framework for the Adapted Indicators ......................................................... 33 2.2 Indicators ..................................................................................................... 34 2.3 The adaptation process ............................................................................... 34 3 Accepting new jurisdictions to the IUCN Green List Programme .............. 38 3.1 Multi-Site Applications to the IUCN Green List Programme ........................... 389 4 Achieving and maintaining IUCN ‘Green List’ status .................................. 43 4.1 Application Phase ........................................................................................ 44 4.2 Candidate Phase ......................................................................................... 47 4.3 Green List Phase ......................................................................................... 51 4.4 Incomplete PA applications .......................................................................... 55 4.5 PAs not added to the Green List .................................................................. 57 5 Terms of Reference for Green List participants .......................................... 58 5.1 IUCN Council ............................................................................................... 58 5.2 IUCN Director General ................................................................................. 58 5.3 Green List Committee .................................................................................. 59 5.4 Green List Standard Committee ................................................................... 63 5.5 Green List Management Committee ............................................................ 66 5.6 Green List Operations Team ........................................................................ 68 5.7 IUCN WCPA Regional Vice Chairs .............................................................. 70 5.8 Expert Assessment Group for the Green List (EAGL) and its formation ....... 72 5.9 Reviewers .................................................................................................... 79 5.10 Independent Assurance Provider ................................................................. 82 5.11 PA Managers / PA agencies ........................................................................ 83 5.12 Mentors ........................................................................................................ 84 5.13 Implementing Partners ................................................................................. 85 6 Complying with the rules and procedures and variations .......................... 87 7 Document control and translations .............................................................. 87 8 Recording and publishing information ........................................................ 88 9 Complaints and resolutions .......................................................................... 92 4 User Manual: IUCN Green List Programme Annex: Green List Guidance...................................................................................93 Where to find the IUCN Green List Standard on COMPASS ................................... 93 How to upload information on Adapted Indicators to COMPASS ............................. 93 How to verify the Indicator adaptation process on COMPASS ................................. 94 How to summarise site visits on COMPASS ............................................................ 95 The IUCN Green List and PANORAMA–Solutions for a Healthy Planet platform ..... 95 The IUCN Green List and World Heritage ............................................................... 95 Action Plans ............................................................................................................ 97 Stakeholder engagement ........................................................................................ 97 Site visits ............................................................................................................... 100 Conflicts of Interest (COI) ...................................................................................... 101 Setting up an EAGL............................................................................................... 102 Template for Call for Expressions of Interest in EAGL Membership ...................... 104 Declaration of Engagement .....................................................................................109 Figures Figure 1: Overview of the IUCN Green List Programme Theory of Change ............. 11 Figure 2: Overview of the governance structure of the IUCN Green List .................. 12 Figure 3: Workflow of the Green List Programme summarised into three phases .... 13 Figure 4: Green List Standard and Generic Indicators development (simplified) ...... 25 Figure 5: Adapting the Generic Indicators ............................................................... 33 Figure 6: The Green List process (simplified) .......................................................... 43 Figure 7: Application Phase ..................................................................................... 46 Figure 8: The different steps of the Candidate Phase .............................................. 47 Figure 9: Green List Phase...................................................................................... 51 Figure 10: Process for the setting up an EAGL ........................................................ 77 5 User Manual: IUCN Green List Programme Versions Issued No. Date Description Of Amendment 1.0 01 September 2016 First publication 1.1 09 August 2018 • Removed ambiguity and provided clarification throughout • New chapter on adding jurisdictions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resit Akcakaya
    H. Reşit Akçakaya Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA • 1-631-632-8605 • http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/akcakayalab/ EDUCATION 1989 Ph.D. in Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook Thesis: "Population cycles of mammals: theory and evidence" 1983 B.Sc. (high honors) in Biology, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey CAREER 2007 to present Professor, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York 2012 to 2015 Director, Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York 1988 to 2007 Senior Scientist, Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York 1993 Post-doctoral fellow, Inst. of Animal Ecology, Univ. of Lausanne, Switzerland PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND MEMBERSHIPS 2016 to present IUCN SSC Task Force on Assessing Conservation Success, which is developing guidelines for a new IUCN Green List of Species to quantify species recovery and conservation impact. 2014 to present Regional Editor (North America), Conservation Biology 2014 to present Coordinating Lead Author, Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), deliverable on "Policy support tools and methodologies for scenario analysis and modelling of biodiversity and ecosystem services." 2001 to present Chair, Red List Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC). 2001 to present IUCN SSC Red List Committee 2012 to present IUCN SSC Climate Change Specialist Group Steering Committee 2014 to
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature
    INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGIONAL OFFICE ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Mutnovsky Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia © IUCN/Boris Erg CONTENTS 2 Message from the Director 3 IUCN at a glance 5 Strategic orientation 6 IUCN ECARO Members 8 IUCN Commissions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia 9 Regional Councillors 9 Regional Conservation Forum 2019 10 Programme work and main achievements 10 Valuing and conserving nature 15 Governance of nature’s use 18 Deploying Nature-based Solutions 20 Our team 21 Publications and other outputs 24 Promotional materials 25 Events and awareness campaigns 27 Strategic partnerships 27 Regional financial summary 2019 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR This year marked the 15th anniversary since the establishment of the IUCN office in Belgrade in 2004. We have come a long way ever since. From a small team operating a modest portfolio of activities in South-East Europe to a dedicated international team managing a diverse regional programme across Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The path has been challenging and winding, and we have managed to travel this far by working closely with our Members and Commissions, who have greatly helped us raise the profile of IUCN in the region, build successful partnerships and open new thematic chapters Boris Erg, Director of the IUCN Regional Office in our work. By working together, we have successfully for Eastern Europe and Central Asia contributed to policy development and institutional strengthening, priority setting and resource mobilisation for conservation action in the region, and we have also invested in knowledge generation, capacity building, and community engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Waste and the Circular Economy
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Electronic waste and the Circular Economy First Report of Session 2019–21 HC 220 Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Rt Hon Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) (Chair) Duncan Baker MP (Conservative, North Norfolk) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Feryal Clark MP (Labour, Enfield North) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Rt Hon Robert Goodwill MP (Conservative, Scarborough and Whitby) Ian Levy MP (Conservative, Blyth Valley) Marco Longhi MP (Conservative, Dudley North) Caroline Lucas MP (Green Party, Brighton, Pavilion) Cherilyn Mackrory MP (Conservative, Truro and Falmouth) Jerome Mayhew MP (Conservative, Broadland) John McNally MP (Scottish National Party, Falkirk) Dr Matthew Offord MP (Conservative, Hendon) Alex Sobel MP (Labour (Co-op), Leeds North West) Claudia Webbe MP (Independent, Leicester East) Nadia Whittome MP (Labour, Nottingham East) The following Member is a former member of the Committee: Mr Shailesh Vara MP (Conservative, North West Cambridgeshire) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152A. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Potential of Green Bond Finance for Resource-Efficient Investments
    Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 ISBN 978-92 -79-63802-2 doi:10.2779/234777 © European Union, November 2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for ENVIRONMENT Directorate ENV.A — Policy Unit ENV.A.2— Green Finance & Economic Analysis European Commission B-1049 Brussels Study on the potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments Authors: Annica Cochu, Carsten Glenting, Dominic Hogg, Ivo Georgiev, Julija Skolina, Frederik Eisinger, Malene Jespersen, Rainer Agster, Steven Fawkes, Tanzir Chowdhury 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 8 ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Euromanifestos Dataset 1979/1999 and 2004
    EUROMANIFESTO DOCUMENTATION Daniela Braun, Maike Salzwedel, Christian Stumpf and Andreas M. Wüst This file compiles all relevant information on the Euromanifesto collection, on missing Euromanifestos, on the coding, on additional variables provided by the coders, and the information on all variables included in the Euromanifesto dataset. The latter information also contains macro data for each country, party, and election, like vote shares, seats and parliamentary group membership. For the analytical variables that have been computed and used for analyses, the SPSS syntax is documented as well. The documentation includes information divided into the following five parts: 1. Coded Euromanifestos 1979–2004 2. Euromanifestos Coding Scheme (EMCS) 3. Euromanifesto Coding Instructions 4. Additional Information Provided by Coders 5. Description of the Euromanifestos Dataset Version 31/05/2012 GESIS study no. ZA4457 doi:10.4232/1.4457 1 Coded Euromanifestos 1979–2004 EUROPE (Euro-Parties) Initials Party Name EM-ID Elections Manifestos first-last not available EPP-ED European People’s Party-European Democrats 10600 1979-2004 - PES Party of European Socialists 10300 1979-2004 - ELDR European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party 10400 1979-2004 - EFGP European Federation of Green Parties 10100 1989-2004 - AUSTRIA Initials Party Name EM-ID Elections Manifestos first-last not available SPÖ Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs 42320 1996-2004 - Social Democratic Party of Austria ÖVP Österreichische Volkspartei 42520 1996-2004 - Austrian People’s Party
    [Show full text]
  • Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament Elections Since 1979 Codebook (July 31, 2019)
    Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament elections since 1979 Vincenzo Emanuele (Luiss), Davide Angelucci (Luiss), Bruno Marino (Unitelma Sapienza), Leonardo Puleo (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna), Federico Vegetti (University of Milan) Codebook (July 31, 2019) Description This dataset provides data on electoral volatility and its internal components in the elections for the European Parliament (EP) in all European Union (EU) countries since 1979 or the date of their accession to the Union. It also provides data about electoral volatility for both the class bloc and the demarcation bloc. This dataset will be regularly updated so as to include the next rounds of the European Parliament elections. Content Country: country where the EP election is held (in alphabetical order) Election_year: year in which the election is held Election_date: exact date of the election RegV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between parties that enter or exit from the party system. A party is considered as entering the party system where it receives at least 1% of the national share in election at time t+1 (while it received less than 1% in election at time t). Conversely, a party is considered as exiting the part system where it receives less than 1% in election at time t+1 (while it received at least 1% in election at time t). AltV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between existing parties, namely parties receiving at least 1% of the national share in both elections under scrutiny. OthV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between parties falling below 1% of the national share in both the elections at time t and t+1.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy Shaping a Sustainable Future For
    Shaping a Sustainable Future for South-Eastern Europe A Strategic Plan for IUCN in SEE This publication has been made possible in part through the support of the MAVA Foundation Shaping a Sustainable Future for South-Eastern Europe A Strategic Plan for IUCN in SEE Table of Contents Acronyms and abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................5 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................6 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................7 2. Regional context ......................................................................................................................................8 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................8 2.2 Sectors ..............................................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Nature conservation ................................................................................................................9 2.2.2 Agriculture .............................................................................................................................11 2.2.3 Forestry .................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The French Party System Forms a Benchmark Study of the State of Party Politics in France
    evans cover 5/2/03 2:37 PM Page 1 THE FRENCH PARTY SYSTEM THE FRENCHPARTY This book provides a complete overview of political parties in France. The social and ideological profiles of all the major parties are analysed chapter by chapter, highlighting their principal functions and dynamics within the system. This examination is THE complemented by analyses of bloc and system features, including the pluralist left, Europe, and the ideological space in which the parties operate. In particular, the book addresses the impressive FRENCH capacity of French parties and their leaders to adapt themselves to the changing concerns of their electorates and to a shifting PARTY institutional context. Contrary to the apparently fragmentary system and increasingly hostile clashes between political personalities, the continuities in the French political system seem SYSTEM destined to persist. Drawing on the expertise of its French and British contributors, The French party system forms a benchmark study of the state of party politics in France. It will be an essential text for all students of Edited by French politics and parties, and of interest to students of European Evans Jocelyn Evans politics more generally. ed. Jocelyn Evans is Lecturer in Politics at the University of Salford The French party system The French party system edited by Jocelyn A. J. Evans Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Council Madrid
    ! ! To: Council Delegates From: Committee Proposal to the Madrid Spring Council 2013 as a follow up of the Athens Council resolution on the re-categorisation of the former observers of the European Green Party in view of the Statutory Changes of the European Green Party. The working group on membership review has continued its consultation process to evaluate and assess all current members/observers and applicants and evaluate the partners on the criteria for Membership according to the adopted resolution in Paris. The working group proposes the following re-categorisation of the last two of the former observers. A short motivation explains the recommendation. A longer report is available for the Russian Greens. The working group supports the recommendation of the Committee on the Green representation in Bulgaria. Country/Party Recommended for Short motivation category Belarus Associate Member The Committee was not able to organise a fact Green Party finding mission to Belarus. In view of the focus on the campaign as explained further and our sincere wish to award to our partner the attention it deserves we propose an interim solution and that is to accept the Belarus Green Party as an Associate member until a fact finding mission and proper assessment can be made, which we plan for after the 2014 elections and before the end of the mandate of the current Committee. Bulgaria, Full Member As a result of the assignment by the Athens Council Zelenite the Committee proposes full membership for Zelenite as you can read in Annex. The Committee proposes to review the membership of two parties in Bulgaria after the European elections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slovenian Greens: from Early Success to Long-Term Failure
    0 8 THE SLOVENIAN GREENS: POLITIKA FROM EARLY SUCCESS TO LONG-TERM FAILURE SUCCESS TO LONG-TERM FAILURE LONG-TERM TO SUCCESS EARLY FROM THE GREENS: SLOVENIAN Danica Fink-Hafner POLITIKA Matej Knep Meta Novak 8 ii Published in book series Politika Simona Kustec Lipicer (ed.) Politične vsebine in volilna kampanja Alenka Krašovec (ed.) Volitve v Evropski parlament 2009 Tomaž Deželan Nasproti evropskemu federalizmu? Simona Kustec Lipicer, Samo Kropivnik,Tomaž Deželan in Alem Maksuti Volilni programi in stališča Drago Zajc, Samo Kropivnik, Simona Kustec Lipicer Od volilnih programov do koalicijskih pogodb Janko Prunk in Marjetka Rangus Sto let življenja slovenskih političnih strank: 1890–1990 Danica Fink-Hafner (ed.) The Development of Civil Society in the Countries on the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1980s The Slovenian Greens: From Early Success to Long-Term Failure Danica Fink-Hafner, Matej Knep, Meta Novak POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA POLITIKA Danica Fink-Hafner, Matej Knep, Meta Novak The Slovenian Greens: From Early Success to Long-Term Failure Book series: POLITIKA Editor: Alenka Krašovec Publisher: Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana For the publisher: Hermina Kranjc Copyright © FDV 2015, Ljubljana. Peer review: Professor Bogomil Ferfila and Associate Professor Drago Zajc Language editing by Mark Gough Cover design by Janko Testen Layout by: Leon Beton The book was financially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency. Ljubljana, 2015 CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 329(497.4)(0.034.2) FINK-Hafner, Danica FINThe Slovenian Greens [Elektronski vir] : from early success to long-term failure / Danica Fink-Hafner, Matej Knep, Meta Novak.
    [Show full text]
  • WCPA Technical Reports 2019 and Goals 2020 1 • Co-Author on WCPA Publications Promoting Ambitious Targets for Terrestrial and Marine Conservation Areas
    Technical Reports 2019 & Goals 2020 Cover image: Calanques, Marseilles, France – Claudia Meyer Freeimages Table of Contents Chair 1 Deputy Chair 7 Regions Caribbean and Central America 13 East and South Africa 16 East Asia 26 Europe 31 North Africa, West Asia, Middle East 36 North America 42 North Eurasia 48 Oceania 51 South Asia 58 Southeast Asia 62 West and Central Africa 66 Themes Capacity Development 75 Marine – Large Scale Marine Protected Areas, High Seas 82 Natural Solutions 96 People and Parks - #Nature for All 100 Science and Management – Green List 105 Young Professionals 111 Task Forces Beyond the Aichi Targets 121 Biodiversity and Protected Areas 127 Large Scale Marine Protected Areas – under marine Marine Green List and Management Effectiveness – under marine Marine Mammal Protected Areas 132 #NatureForAll under People and Parks Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures 140 Specialist Groups Climate Change 141 Connectivity 148 Geoheritage 159 Governance 159 Green List – under Management Effectiveness High Seas - under marine Privately Protected Areas and Nature Stewardship 179 Tourism and Protected Areas 196 Transboundary Conservation 208 Urban Conservation Strategies 214 Publications Best Practice Guidelines 215 PARKS 218 Chair / Deputy Chair IUCN WORLD COMMISSION ON PROTECTED AREAS ANNUAL REPORT TO STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIR: WCPA CO-CHAIR OECM TASK F0RCE KATHY MACKINNON REPORTING PERIOD: 1 January 2019 – 31 December 2019 OVERVIEW OF 2019 (insert 3-4 paragraphs reflecting highlights for the year) 2019 has been another busy and successful year, with good progress on many WCPA priorities. 2019 saw great progress towards achieving Aichi Target 11, with considerable expansion of protected areas (especially in the marine realm) and good progress on defining and establishing criteria for Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs).
    [Show full text]