DOCSLIB.ORG

Avrasya Incelemeleri Merkezi Center for Eurasian Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Avrasya Incelemeleri Merkezi Center for Eurasian Studies AVRASYA İNCELEMELERİ MERKEZİ CENTER FOR EURASIAN STUDIES LONG-AWAITED TRIAL OF ARMENIAN EX-PRESIDENT BEGINS IN YEREVAN - 13.09.2019 Eurasianet (12 September 2019) The long-awaited trial of former president of Armenia Robert Kocharyan for his role in the violent breakup of protests in 2008 has begun, with both Kocharyan and relatives of the victims testifying in court. In a packed courtroom with dozens of spectators and twenty police officers watching over the proceedings, Kocharyan sat in the front row, just feet away from people who blame him for the deaths of their loved ones. Sargis Qloyan, the father of one of the victims, in his testimony directly addressed Kocharyan, asking him why there was no proper investigation into the events and why no one was arrested. You are a man, go and serve the full punishment as a man, Qloyan told the ex-president. The spectators, divided between Kocharyan supporters and opponents, erupted in boos and cheers, respectively. Kocharyan, for his part, dismissed the entire September 12 proceeding as a politicized vendetta. This is the most shameful criminal case in the history of the Republic of Armenia, he told the judge. One day it will be documented in schoolbooks and I have no doubt who the anti-hero will be. The events of March 1-2, 2008, were one the darkest periods in Armenias recent history. Demonstrators gathered in Yerevan to protest elections that they believed were stolen by Kocharyan, then the president, and his ally Serzh Sargsyan, who had just won the vote. Police and military units broke up the protests violently; two policemen and eight protesters were killed. One of the leaders of the protests was Nikol Pashinyan, then a journalist and opposition politician, who spent nearly two years in prison as a result. But after Pashinyan led protests that toppled Sargsyans government last year, and then himself became prime minister, he has placed a priority on punishing the perpetrators. In court with Kocharyan were several other former top officials who also have been accused in the case: Seyran Ohanyan, the former defense minister; Armen Gevorgyan, the former secretary of the National Security Council; and Yuri Khachaturov, the chief of the Yerevan military garrison during the crackdown. But all the attention was on Kocharyan, who appeared relaxed in court, wearing a blue suit with no tie and on occasion turning back to smile at the spectators in the courtroom. Most of the proceedings on the first day of the trial were procedural, dealing with a motion by the defense to release Kocharyan because, as the head of state, he enjoyed immunity from prosecution. The judge said a ruling on that motion would be issued September 17. The case against Kocharyan has been a touchstone for the struggle between Pashinyan and the judicial system, which is staffed by judges inherited from the former regime and which the current authorities believe remain loyal to them. The ex-president was first arrested in July 2018, after flying himself from Russia to be questioned as part of the then-new governments investigation into the March 2008 events. He has since been on a legal odyssey, in and out of jail three times. In May, after a court ordered Kocharyan to be released, Pashinyan called on his supporters to rally and block the entrances of court buildings, leading many to accuse the prime minister of the same kind of political interference of which he accuses his predecessors. But the next month, an appeals court ordered that he be arrested again and the Constitutional Court, the countrys highest judicial body, said that it would consider a request from Kocharyans legal team to examine whether the charges against him were constitutional. On September 4, that court ruled that Kocharyans arrest was unconstitutional, but he remained in jail. Throughout, Russia has regularly signaled its disapproval of the process. Last summer, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the proceedings against Kocharyan can not not concern us. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has twice pointedly sent warm, public birthday greetings to his embattled former counterpart, most recently less than two weeks ago. Outside the courtroom, the scene was chaotic, as more supporters and opponents gathered with megaphones, and music. Kocharyan opponents carried signs reading Life Sentence for Rob, and depicting him in a Turkish fez with a hammer and sickle. I was a participant in those events [of 2008] and brutally beaten by police, one, Arus Hovhannisyan, told Eurasianet. Another, Henrik Hartanyan, said he believed the courts were biased in favor of the former authorities. This has been going on for too long, he said. I cant talk about my expectations, since no one trusts the courts. The Kocharyan supporters had signs reading Freedom and depicting Pashinyan with an exaggerated paunch, gorging on hot dogs. We want justice for Kocharyan, said one, Mikael Aghajanyan, who said he was confident the former president would be released. None of these charges have any basis. If they had any proof he would have been in prison a long time ago. Following the hearing there was a clash between the two sides; witnesses said that some of the Kocharyan supporters attacked his opponents. Several were taken to the police station and one man was taken to the hospital. https://eurasianet.org/long-awaited-trial-of-armenian-ex-president-begins-in-yerevan Kaynak/Source: .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transnational Armenian Terrorism and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict of 1988-1994) End
    Karabakh Oleg KUZNETSOV, PhD in History, MCL (Moscow, Russia) First Terrorist War: A Look from Russia (Transnational Armenian Terrorism and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict of 1988-1994) End. For the beginning, see İRS-Heritage 2 (21), 3 (22) 2015 n addition to numerous acts of terrorism and wide- spread terrorist crimes related to the organization by Iforeign nationals of illegal armed groups in the terri- tory of Armenia and their participation in the activities of such groups, representatives of the Armenian side to the conflict committed other crimes of a similar nature during the Karabakh war, facts that were recorded on the Azerbaijani side. First of all, we are talking about a Car in which journalist S. Asgarova, Lt-Col Larionov, Maj Ivanov and Sgt Goyek were shot dead by Armenian terrorists on 9 January 1991 58 www.irs-az.com 4(23), WINTER 2015 very specific terrorist crime like an armed insurgency, criminal liability for which is stipulated by Article 279 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The main qualifying feature of this criminal act is the motiva- tion and goal-setting of participation in the crime: those guilty of committing it take action to change the constitutional system or the territorial integrity of the country. Actions of this kind were committed by soldiers of Armenian origin under the commander of the 2nd Battalion of the 336th Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 23rd Motorized Infantry Division of the 4th Army of the CIS Joint Armed Forces under the command of Major Seyran Ohanyan, who not only seized fighting equipment - infantry fighting vehicles (BMP-2) - without a military order, but also used them against Azerbaijani territorial defense units in the battle of 25 February 1992 for the town of Khojali, which subsequently led to mass deaths of civilians in this town.
    [Show full text]
  • Report by Nils Muižnieks
    Strasbourg, 10 March 2015 CommDH(2015)2 Original version REPORT BY NILS MUIŽNIEKS COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FOLLOWING HIS VISIT TO ARMENIA FROM 5 TO 9 OCTOBER 2014 FF Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 The administration of justice and the protection of human rights in the justice system .......................... 7 1.1 Administration of justice ..........................................................................................................................7 1.1.1 Judicial reforms ..................................................................................................................................7 1.1.2 Independence, impartiality and effectiveness of the justice system .................................................8 1.1.2.1 Self-governance of the judiciary ................................................................................................8 1.1.2.2 Issues relating to the independence and impartiality of judges ...............................................9 1.1.2.3 Issues related to the effectiveness of the justice system ........................................................12 Conclusions and recommendations ..........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Privatization, State Militarization Through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia Anna Martirosyan University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 7-18-2014 Privatization, State Militarization through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia Anna Martirosyan University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Martirosyan, Anna, "Privatization, State Militarization through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia" (2014). Dissertations. 234. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/234 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Privatization, State Militarization through War, and Durable Social Exclusion in Post-Soviet Armenia Anna Martirosyan M.A., Political Science, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 2008 M.A., Public Policy Administration, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 2002 B.A., Teaching Foreign Languages, Vanadzor Teachers' Training Institute, Armenia, 1999 A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School at the University of Missouri - St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science July 11, 2014 Advisory Committee David Robertson, Ph.D. (Chair) Eduardo Silva, Ph.D. Jean-Germain Gros, Ph.D. Kenneth Thomas, Ph.D. Gerard Libardian, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i
    [Show full text]
  • SECURITY and STABILITY in the SOUTH CAUCASUS: FOSTERING ENDURING REGIONAL PEACE 19 May 2015
    ROSE-ROTH 093 SEM 15 E rev. 3 Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly 89th ROSE-ROTH Seminar With the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia Yerevan, Armenia 18-20 June 2015 SECURITY AND STABILITY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: FOSTERING ENDURING REGIONAL PEACE 19 May 2015 OFFICIAL SEMINAR HASHTAG #NATOPAARM15 WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE SWISS GOVERNMENT www.nato-pa.int Place du Petit Sablon 3 1000 Brussels, Belgium • Tel: + 32 (0) 2 513 28 65 093 SEM 15 E rev. 3 Wednesday 17 June Arrival of participants Accommodation Marriott Hotel Yerevan Republic Square, Amiryan 1 street, Yerevan, 0010 Armenia Phone: 374 10 599 000 | Fax: 374 10 599 001 http://www.Marriotthotels.com Seminar Venue Government Guest House 47 Mashtots avenue, Yerevan 0009, Armenia Thursday 18 June 8:30-10:15 Registration of participants staying at the Marriott Hotel, hotel lobby 10:15-11:00 Registration of local participants in front of the Government Guest House Hall 10:15 Departure by bus to the Government Guest House 10:45 Arrival and seating of participants OPENING SESSION Moderator: Koryun NAHAPETYAN, Head of the Armenian Delegation to the NATO PA 11:00-11:10 Opening remarks by Galust SAHAKYAN, Speaker of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia (to be confirmed) 11:10-11:20 Introduction by Paolo ALLI, Vice-President, NATO Parliamentary Assembly 11:20-11:25 Welcome address by Ambassador Lukas GASSER, Ambassador of Switzerland to Armenia 11:25-11:40 Keynote address by Edward NALBANDYAN, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia (to be confirmed) 11:40-12:00 Keynote address by speaker to be confirmed 12:00-:1300 Questions and Answers 13:00-14:15 Lunch hosted by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia in the Government Guest House 1 093 SEM 15 E rev.
    [Show full text]
  • American University of Armenia International
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA INTERNATIONAL MILITARY COOPERATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA SINCE INDEPENDENCE A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY MARINE MARGARYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA DECEMBER 2011 1 SIGNATURE PAGE Faculty Advisor Date Dean Date American University of Armenia December 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is a pleasure for me to state that I am indebted to my Faculty Advisor Dr. Khatchik Der Ghougassian, first and foremost, for the knowledge and skills that he gave me during my years of study. His supervision and guidance in the process of writing this master’s essay improved the quality of my work, ensured the motivation to do my best and put all my efforts. I would like to express my special gratitude to my lovely Professor Dr. Lucig Danielian who shared her precious experience and personal qualities with her students and encouraged me in the work that I do. Throughout my study she provided me wise advices, motivation and inspiration and just an opportunity to learn from a person like her. Thank you from all my heart. This thesis would not have been possible unless all the faculty members with their sound experience, knowledge and skills were not imputing in the personal and professional development of the students. I am grateful to the efforts of all the lecturers and professors that led me to the eminence. You were a life changing experience for me. It is a pleasure to thank all my classmates who made the years of my study enjoyment and fun.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey, Azerbaijan Launch Attack on Artsakh, Armenia
    OCTOBER 3, 2020 MMirror-SpeirTHEror-SpeARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXXI, NO. 12, Issue 4654 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 IN BRIEF Biden Calls on Trump APPEAL FROM THE ADL SUPREME COUNCIL Administration to Demand Turkey Stay are heading towards the border, as the homeland is in Armenia under Attack danger. Out of Conflict Therefore, the Armenian Democratic Liberal Party WASHINGTON (Public Radio of Armenia) — US Recent bellicose rhetoric by Azerbaijani and (ADL) Supreme Council condemns, in no uncertain presidential candidate Joe Biden has called on the Turkish public figures turned into acts of aggression terms, the Azerbaijani aggression, and expresses its Trump Administration to demand from Turkey to on the morning of September 27, as Azerbaijani solidarity with the people of Armenia and Artsakh. stay out of the Karabakh conflict. armed forces, violating the terms of the ceasefire, The mobilization in Armenia must take place also in “With casualties rapidly mounting in and around launched a massive attack along the line of contact, pri- the diaspora, and encourage the volunteer movement, heal the Nagorno-Karabakh, the Trump Administration marily the Artsakh-Azerbaijani border. Despite Armenia’s pow- wounded, and support the Armenian people in Artsakh and needs to call the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan erful retaliation, there are Armenian military and civilian casu- Armenia. Mobilization in the diaspora must lead to massive immediately to de-escalate the situation. It must alties. Hundreds are reported wounded and 16 killed. The pop- protests in front of Azerbaijani and Turkish official institutions also demand others — like Turkey — stay out of this ulations of Armenia and Artsakh (Karabakh) have been mobi- and diplomatic offices, massive news coverage to sensitize conflict,” Joe Biden said in a Twitter post.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Networks and Formal Institutions in Armenia
    WAR, BUSINESS AND POLITICS: INFORMAL NetworKS AND ForMAL Institutions IN ARMenia Alexander Iskandaryan, Hrant Mikaelian and Sergey Minasyan Yerevan • 2016 UDC 32.001:330:355/359 WAR, BUSINESS AND POLITICS: INFORMAL NETWORKS AND FORMAL INSTITUTIONS IN ARMENIA. – Alexander Iskandaryan, Hrant Mikaelian and Sergey Minasyan. –Yerevan: Caucasus Institute. 2016. - 144 p. The volume presents the results of a study of formal and informal groups and mechanisms within Armenia’s political, economic and military elites, aiming to reveal trends in formal institution-building and the changing role of informality in Armenia’s power system since its independence from the USSR. The study relies on data from over 50 interviews with elite actors, backed up by archive materials, media stories, and expert opinions. A separate case study looks at the emergence and evolution of the Armenian army. Research team: Liana Avetisyan, Luiza Ayvazyan, Gayane Baghdasaryan, Ani Grigoryan, Johnny Melikyan, Tatevik Sargsyan, Marina Saryan, Naira Vardanyan Editing by Nina Iskandaryan Copy editing by AJE Cover design by Matit / www.matit.am Layout by Collage / www.collage.am ISBN 978-9939-1-0464-5 © Caucasus Institute, 2016 The present study was conducted with the support of the Academic Swiss Caucasus Net (ASCN), a programme aimed at promoting the social sciences and humanities in the South Caucasus (primarily Georgia and Armenia). Its activities foster the emergence of a new generation of talented scholars. Promising junior researchers receive support through research projects, capacity-building, training and scholarships. The programme emphasises the advancement of individuals who, thanks to their ASCN experience, become better integrated in international academic networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia 2020 Human Rights Report
    ARMENIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Armenia’s constitution provides for a parliamentary republic with a unicameral legislature, the National Assembly (parliament). The prime minister, elected by parliament, heads the government; the president, also elected by parliament, largely performs a ceremonial role. During 2018 parliamentary elections, the My Step coalition, led by Acting Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, won 70 percent of the vote and an overwhelming majority of seats in parliament. According to the assessment of the international election observation mission under the umbrella of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the parliamentary elections were held with respect for fundamental freedoms. The national police force is responsible for internal security, while the National Security Service is responsible for national security, intelligence activities, and border control. The Special Investigative Service (SIS) is a separate agency specializing in preliminary investigation of cases involving suspected abuses by public officials. The Investigative Committee is responsible for conducting pretrial investigations into general civilian and military criminal cases and incorporates investigative services. The National Security Service and the police chiefs report directly to the prime minister and are appointed by the president upon the prime minister’s recommendation. The cabinet appoints the heads of the Special Investigative Service and Investigative Committee upon the prime minister’s recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagorno Karabakh Geo-Politics: Interests and Politics of Outsiders
    The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict. Causes of the conflict and obstacles to conflict resolution. Item Type Thesis Authors Nikkar-Esfahani, Hamidreza Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 27/09/2021 12:21:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5650 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Causes of the conflict and obstacles to conflict resolution Hamidreza Nikkar-Esfahani Department of Peace Studies University of Bradford Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2009 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments: ...................................................................................................... vii Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................. viii Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • SIPRI Yearbook 2012: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security
    286 MILITARY SPENDING AND ARMAMENTS, 2011 IV. Arms transfers to Armenia and Azerbaijan, 2007–11 PAUL HOLTOM There have been regular warnings since the 1994 ceasefire about the pros- pect of a renewal of the 1992–94 war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-populated region of Azerbaijan (see figure 6.3). In 2011 several observers noted particular pressures in the two countries that could push them into war in the near future.1 Armenia and Azerbaijan have both identified the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a key national security priority.2 While both sides stress a commitment to a peaceful resolution of the conflict, each accuses the other of violating the 1990 Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE Treaty) and of pushing them into an arms race.3 In military parades held in 2011 both states displayed new and previously unseen military equipment in obvious shows of strength.4 Azerbaijan had the largest real-terms increase in military expenditure between 2010 and 2011, while in 2010 Armenia spent a larger proportion of its gross domestic product (GDP) on military expenditure than any other state in Europe.5 Between 2002–2006 and 2007–11 Azerbaijan increased its volume of imports of major conventional weapons, and it rose to become the 38th largest recipient, up from 53rd in 2002–2006, while Armenia’s imports fell and it dropped from 71st place to 84th. While in 2002–2006 Azerbaijan imported 2.5 times the volume of major conventional weapons imported by Armenia, by 2007–11 the gap had widened, with Azerbaijan importing 7.5 times more arms than Armenia (see table 6.7).
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus Strategic Perspectives
    HIGHLIGHT OF JOURNAL The role of ideology in mass atrocities: The case of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan Vugar Gurbanov CAUCASUS STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES Volume 1 • Issue 2 • Winter 2020 Armenia and Azerbaijan: CAUCASUS Between Failed Peace and War STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES - ARTICLES COMMENTARIES Geopolitics and the Second Karabakh War The Gordian Knot of the Armenia–Azerbaijan Damjan Krnjevic Miskovic Conflict and the Second Karabakh War: Conclusions and Reflections Western Blind Spot in the South Caucasus: Esmira Jafarova Chronicle of a War Foretold Robert M. Cutler Turkey’s Presence, Involvement and Engagement in the Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict: A Reflection on Volume 1 • Issue 2 Winter 2020 Economic Potential of the Liberated Azerbaijani–Turkish Relations Territories of Azerbaijan: A Brief Overview Ayça Ergun Rovshan Ibrahimov Violations of International Humanitarian Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict: Law by Armenia in the Second Karabakh war The Failure of Multilateral Diplomacy Nizami Safarov and Najiba Mustafayeva Murad Muradov Ukrainian Discourse on the Assessing Damage Caused by Illegal Armenia–Azerbaijan Conflict Activities of Armenia to Azerbaijan in the Liberated Anna Korzeniowska-Bihun (Formerly Occupied) Territories Javid Alyarli and Arzu Abbasova International Response to the Second Karabakh War Nina Miholjcic BOOK REVIEW SERIES: Exculpation of Armenian terrorism under guise of the ‘Armenian martyr’ reviewed by Murad Muradov Sama Baghirova “The Light that Failed: A Reckoning” (authored by Ivan Krastev and Stephen Holmes) JOURNALISTIC DISPATCH * reviewed by Mahammad Mammadov Dispatch from the Conflict Zone during “The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Azerbaijan’s Patriotic War Rules the World” (authored by Anu Bradford) Elmira Musazadeh Volume 1 • Issue 2 • Winter 2020 Armenia and Azerbaijan: Between Failed Peace and War CAUCASUS STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia2017partypoliticallands
    Armenia 20172017:: An introduction to the partyparty----politicalpolitical landscape March 2017 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Armenian Communist Party (Armenian: Հայաստանի կոմունիստական կուսակցություն , ՀԿԿ ; Hayastani Komunistakan Kusaktsutyun, HKK) ..................................................................................... 3 Armenian Revolutionary Federation, (ARF) Հայ Հեղափոխական Դաշնակցություն (ՀՅԴ ), Hay Heghapokhakan Dashnaktsutyun, ...................................................................................................... 4 Armenian Renaissance Party (former Rule of Law Party, Orinats Yerkir), “ Հայկական վերածնունդ կուսակցություն », Haykakan veradznund kusakcutyun ...................................................................... 6 Coalition of Armenian National Congress and People’s Party of Armenia ( ՀԱԿ -ՀԺԿ դաշինք ) ANC-PPA ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Free Democrats (Armenian: Ազատ դեմոկրատներ կուսակցություն , ԱԶԿ ; Azat Demokratner Kusaktsutyun, AZK) ......................................................................................................................... 10 Ohanyan-Raffi-Oskanyan alliance ( Օհանյան -Րաֆֆի -Օսկանյան դաշինք ) / alliance ORO ................. 11 Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) Հայաստանի Հանրապետական Կուսակցություն
    [Show full text]