1995 Interim Report Beverly Straube Nicholas Luccketti

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1995 Interim Report Beverly Straube Nicholas Luccketti 1995 Interim Report Beverly Straube Nicholas Luccketti APVA Jamestown Rediscovery November 1996 Graphics and maps by Jamie E. May Design and production by Elliott Jordan © 1996 by The Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this report or portions thereof in any form. Contents INTRODUCTION ................................. 5 1995 Excavations ............................... 6 Research Design ............................................................... 6 Results.............................................................................. 8 Pit I (JR1-4) ....................................................................... 8 Palisade Slot Trench (JR60-65) and Buttress Postholes (JR66) ................................................ 10 Pit II (JR4,10,11,12) ......................................................... 12 Structure I (JR50)............................................................. 13 Post-Fort Ditches............................................................. 15 Native American Presence .............................................. 16 ARTIFACTS ....................................... 18 Beads ............................................................................. 18 European Ceramics ......................................................... 20 Pipes .............................................................................. 26 Coins .............................................................................. 28 Jettons ............................................................................ 28 Book Furniture ................................................................ 29 Firearms ......................................................................... 30 Edged Weaponry............................................................ 35 Armor ........................................................................... 39 Significant Individual Artifacts ......................................... 41 DISCUSSION .................................... 46 James Fort and the Fourth Ridge...................................... 46 Copper Manufacture ....................................................... 46 “Tryal of Glasse” ............................................................. 49 English-Paspahegh Interactions ....................................... 51 Notes ............................................... 53 Bibliography ..................................... 55 INTRODUCTION Background weeks. Visiting Senior Archaeologists David K. Hazzard, Alain C. Outlaw, Eric C. Klingelhofer, The year 1995 was the second year of the and Carter L. Hudgins rotated through the Sum- APVA’s Jamestown Rediscovery, an archaeological mer Institute to provide additional supervision of program devoted to discovering and understand- the students. Also contributing to the fieldwork ing the early seventeenth-century settlement on was an eight-week history class from the College of the APVA’s 22 1/2 acres on Jamestown Island. The William and Mary which consisted of five Ameri- 1995 field report is the second annual report on can History or American Studies doctoral students the archaeological work. It covers work conducted with several years of archaeological experience on from March through December 1995 that 1) con- Virginia colonial sites. Professional archaeologists tinued the investigation of features unearthed in and Jamestown Rediscovery Advisory Board mem- 1994 and, 2) expanded the original excavation area bers Alaric Faulkner and Martha Williams each in two directions. volunteered a week of their time on the excavation, The 1994 field season, which lasted from while interns Mike Westfall, Pat Valko, Joanne April through December, investigated an area ap- Robbins, Jane Caputo, and Danny Schmidt made proximately 40’ square between the Jamestown substantial contributions both in the field and in Church and the James River. The excavation un- the laboratory. covered a 23’-long section of a slot trench that Several other scholars generously assisted contained postmolds set side-by-side, a 12’ by 9’ Jamestown Rediscovery in 1995. The artifact collec- pit, three overlapping ditches that postdate the slot tion was studied by Museum of London archaeolo- trench and pit, and about a dozen postmolds and/ gist Geoff Egan, who also worked in the field. E. or postholes. The slot trench is believed to be a Randolph Turner, a prehistoric archaeologist with palisade for one of the first forts constructed at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, Jamestown. Partial excavation of the large pit conducted a basic analysis of the Native American yielded a very large quantity of artifacts that con- ceramic types recovered during the current project. tained evidence of glassmaking, the manufacture The site, since it is a tightly dated and short-lived of copper ornaments that probably were used in context, represents a time capsule for the material trade with the Indians, and many military-related culture of protohistoric and early contact periods. objects, including a complete cabasset helmet, nu- As always, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ar- merous pieces of armor, matchlocks, gun rests, and chitectural historians Willie Graham and Cary edged weapons. The ceramics, dated coins, cloth Carson cheerfully reviewed the architectural evi- seals, jettons, and other artifacts from the site sug- dence and offered suggestions on the nature of gest that it was occupied during the first few years, structures uncovered by Jamestown Rediscovery. of English settlement at Jamestown Island. Drs. Jerre Johnson and Stephen Clement of the ge- ology department at the College of William and Mary continued to freely dispense their wisdom, Acknowledgments identifying geological specimens recovered from the excavation. Also, Fraser D. Neiman, Director The Jamestown Rediscovery staff was in- of Archaeology at Monticello, was always willing creased in 1995 by the addition of two more full- to provide advice on plowzone artifact and soil time field archaeologists, Eric Deetz and Patricia chemical analyses. Sternheimer. The excavations were supplemented Several special scientific studies of Pit I were by an APVA Summer Institute in Historical Ar- conducted during 1995, including parasitological chaeology which comprised ten teachers for 6 analysis by Leslie H. Driscoll, seed analysis by Dr. Steven Mrozowski, pollen analysis by Dr. Gerald Tents to cover the site were obtained Kelso, and microstratigraphic analysis by Doug through a matching grant from the Marietta Curry. Dr. Stuart Fleming of the University of McNeill Morgan and Samuel Tate Morgan, Jr., Pennsylvania Museum performed a metallurgical Foundation of Richmond. Funding for the 1995 analysis of several copper objects recovered from field season was provided by the APVA, the Vir- the excavation. NASA and Bob Berry continued ginia General Assembly, and the National Endow- their significant donations of time and use of ment for the Humanities. The Summer Institute equipment for radiography of iron artifacts. was made possible by a grant from the Jessie Ball Patricia Sternheimer also conducted preliminary DuPont Fund. sorting and identification of the faunal remains. Aerial view of the Jamestown site at the end of the 1995 season. Copyright David M. Doody 1995 Excavations slot trench stopped because a non-palisade struc- Research Design ture such as a watchtower or blockhouse once stood at this point, or the slot trench did not sur- A composite archaeological site plan incor- vive here due to a drop in grade. Consequently, the porating the features discovered in 1994 by excavation area was expanded to the east in order Jamestown Rediscovery and a narrow ditch and four to relocate the slot trench and to ascertain what postholes found in 1949 by J.C. Harrington im- caused the gap. Additionally, a sample of the slot mediately west of the project area revealed that the trench was excavated in 1995. 1994 slot trench corresponded precisely with A total of 24 ten-foot squares and 5 five-by- Harrington’s narrow ditch. Also, Harrington re- ten-foot squares were excavated during the 1995 corded three large postholes at 9 foot intervals at a field season. A twentieth-century sand and gravel break in the slot trench, suggesting the presence of road through the site was removed with a Bobcat a structure, possibly associated with the palisade. grader, all the plowzone was shoveled off and Accordingly, the 1995 field season expanded the screened; and all feature excavation was hand original excavation to the west and northwest to troweled. Several special scientific studies were completely expose the entire structure represented conducted in 1995 of the fill in Pit I, including by Harrington’s postholes and to determine why pollen analysis (both column and spot), column the palisade slot trench apparently stopped or seed analysis, parasite analysis, and microstrati– ended at this point. graphic analysis. When it became clear that the slot trench The 1995 field season completed the excava- was destroyed to the west, probably by construc- tion of features uncovered in 1994, namely Pit I, tion of either the seawall and/or the Confederate Pit II, the three ditches, and excavated sections of Fort, the project shifted its focus to the east of the the palisade slot trench. The extension of the exca- original excavation area. The palisade slot trench vation to the west and northwest uncovered an also was not evident east of the later ditch com- earthfast
Recommended publications
  • Archaeological Survey of Prince House Woods, Fort Raleigh National Historic Site, Roanoke Island, North Carolina
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF PRINCE HOUSE WOODS FORT RALEIGH NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE ROANOKE ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA By: Nicholas M. Luccketti Submitted to: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Southeast Archaeological Center 2035 East Paul Dirac Drive Johnson Building, Suite 120 Tallahassee, FL 23210 ARPA Permit # FORA 2006-001 SEAC Acc. # 2092 FORA Acc. # 88 January 2007 Submitted by: FIRST COLONY FOUNDATION 1501 Cole Mill Road Durham, NC 27705 ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Over the past 25 years, archaeological evidence related to the 16th-century Raleigh settlements on Roanoke Island in North Carolina has been found intermittently on the beach at the north end of Fort Raleigh National Historic Site between the Waterside Theater and the Prince House. These artifacts include an iron ax of 16th- century form, sherds of Iberian storage jar, and in the shallow water, an intact barrel buried and a hollowed out log which both radiocarbon dated to the 16th century. Furthermore, the exposed bluff in this area is subject to continual erosion, thus endangering any archaeological resources that may be present. Accordingly, the First Colony Foundation conducted a survey in October of 2006 to determine the potential for any significant archaeological features, strata, or artifact concentrations related to either the 1585 Lane Colony or the 1587 Lost Colony in the area between the edge of the bluff and the north end of the main parking lot. The 2006 fieldwork consisted of the excavation of test units along a transect that was located about 100’ behind the edge of the bluff. Additional test units were excavated along a foot path to the beach and in the dunes along the beach.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] [Roanoke Colony - Roanoke Chief] Die Furnemmesten der Inseln unde Statt / so Roanoac genannt (A Chief Lord of Roanoke) Stock#: 44430mp2 Map Maker: De Bry Date: 1590 Place: Frankfurt Color: Hand Colored Condition: VG Size: 9 x 12.5 inches Price: SOLD Description: The Chief / Lord of Roanoke -- Sir Walter Raleigh's Roanoke Colony -- Based on a painting by John White. Handsome image of a Roanoke Chief, detailing his manner of dress, hair, etc., with a few of the coatline of area of the Roanoke Colony in the background. In 1585, Governor John White, was part of a voyage from England to the Outer Banks of North Carolina under a plan of Sir Walter Raleigh to settle "Virginia." White was at Roanoke Island for about thirteen months before returning to England for more supplies. During this period he made a series of over seventy watercolor drawings of indigenous people, plants, and animals. The purpose of his drawings was to give those back home an accurate idea of the inhabitants and environment in the New World. The earliest Drawer Ref: Carolinas Stock#: 44430mp2 Page 1 of 4 Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] [Roanoke Colony - Roanoke Chief] Die Furnemmesten der Inseln unde Statt / so Roanoac genannt (A Chief Lord of Roanoke) images derived from White's original drawings were made in 1590, when Theodor De Bry made engravings from White's drawings to be printed in Thomas Hariot's account of the journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown Timeline
    A Jamestown Timeline Christopher Columbus never reached the shores of the North American Continent, but European explorers learned three things from him: there was someplace to go, there was a way to get there, and most importantly, there was a way to get back. Thus began the European exploration of what they referred to as the “New World”. The following timeline details important events in the establishment of the first permanent English settlement in America – Jamestown, Virginia. Preliminary Events 1570s Spanish Jesuits set up an Indian mission on the York River in Virginia. They were killed by the Indians, and the mission was abandoned. Wahunsonacock (Chief Powhatan) inherited a chiefdom of six tribes on the upper James and middle York Rivers. By 1607, he had conquered about 25 other tribes. 1585-1590 Three separate voyages sent English settlers to Roanoke, Virginia (now North Carolina). On the last voyage, John White could not locate the “lost” settlers. 1602 Captain Bartholomew Gosnold explored New England, naming some areas near and including Martha’s Vineyard. 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died; James VI of Scotland became James I of England. Early Settlement Years 1606, April James I of England granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish colonies in Virginia. The charter named two branches of the Company, the Virginia Company of London and the Virginia Company of Plymouth. 1606, December 20 Three ships – Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery - left London with 105 men and boys to establish a colony in Virginia between 34 and 41 degrees latitude. 1607, April 26 The three ships sighted the land of Virginia, landed at Cape Henry (present day Virginia Beach) and were attacked by Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown Long Range Interpretive Plan (LRIP)
    Jamestown Colonial National Historical Park Long Range Interpretive Plan Update July 2009 Prepared for the National Park Service by Ron Thomson, Compass Table of Contents Part 1: Foundation Introduction 4 Background 6 Park in 2009 12 Purpose & Significance 19 Interpretive Themes 22 Audiences 29 Audience Experiences 32 Issues & Initiatives 35 Part 2: Taking Action Introduction 38 Projects from 2000 Plan 38 Current Area of Focus 40 Enhance Existing Resources 40 Anniversaries/Events 43 Linking Research, Interpretation & Sales 44 Education Programs 45 Technology for Interpretation 46 Evaluation & Professional Standards 47 Staffing & Training 47 Library, Collection & Research Needs 48 Implementation Charts 52 Participants 59 Appendices 1. Other Planning Documents 60 2. Partner Mission Statements 64 3. Second Century Goals 66 4. Interpretation & Education Renaissance Action Plan 69 5. Children in Nature 71 2 Part 1 The Foundation 3 Introduction The Long Range Interpretive Plan A Long Range Interpretive Plan (LRIP) provides a 5+ year vision for a park’s interpretive program. A facilitator skilled in interpretive planning works with park staff, partners, and outside consultants to prepare a plan that is consistent with other current planning documents. Part 1 of the LRIP establishes criteria against which existing and proposed personal services and media can be measured. It identifies themes, audiences, audience experiences, and issues. Part 2 describes the mix of services and facilities that are necessary to achieve management goals and interpretive mission. It includes implementation charts that plot a course of action, assign responsibilities, and offer a schedule of activity. When appropriate, Appendices provide more detailed discussions of specific topics. The completed LRIP forms a critical part of the more inclusive Comprehensive Interpretive Plan (CIP).
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Jamestown Colony: Seventeenth-Century and Modern Interpretations
    The History of the Jamestown Colony: Seventeenth-Century and Modern Interpretations A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of the Ohio State University By Sarah McBee The Ohio State University at Mansfield June 2009 Project Advisor: Professor Heather Tanner, Department of History Introduction Reevaluating Jamestown On an unexceptional day in December about four hundred years ago, three small ships embarked from an English dock and began the long and treacherous voyage across the Atlantic. The passengers on board envisioned their goals – wealth and discovery, glory and destiny. The promise of a new life hung tantalizingly ahead of them. When they arrived in their new world in May of the next year, they did not know that they were to begin the journey of a nation that would eventually become the United States of America. This summary sounds almost ridiculously idealistic – dream-driven achievers setting out to start over and build for themselves a better world. To the average American citizen, this story appears to be the classic description of the Pilgrims coming to the new world in 1620 seeking religious freedom. But what would the same average American citizen say to the fact that this deceptively idealistic story actually took place almost fourteen years earlier at Jamestown, Virginia? The unfortunate truth is that most people do not know the story of the Jamestown colony, established in 1607.1 Even when people have heard of Jamestown, often it is with a negative connotation. Common knowledge marginally recognizes Jamestown as the colony that predates the Separatists in New England by more than a dozen years, and as the first permanent English settlement in America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Jamestown Timeline
    A Jamestown Timeline Christopher Columbus never reached the shores of the North American Continent, but European explorers learned three things from him: there was someplace to go, there was a way to get there, and most importantly, there was a way to get back. Thus began the European exploration of what they referred to as the “New World”. The following timeline details important events in the establishment of the fi rst permanent English settlement in America – Jamestown, Virginia. PRELIMINARY EVENTS 1570s Spanish Jesuits set up an Indian mission on the York River in Virginia. They were killed by the Indians, and the mission was abandoned. Wahunsonacock (Chief Powhatan) inherited a chiefdom of six tribes on the upper James and middle York Rivers. By 1607, he had conquered about 25 other tribes. 1585-1590 Three separate voyages sent English settlers to Roanoke, Virginia (now North Carolina). On the last voyage, John White could not locate the “lost” settlers. 1602 Captain Bartholomew Gosnold explored New England, naming some areas near and including Martha’s Vineyard. 1603 Queen Elizabeth I died; James VI of Scotland became James I of England. EARLY SETTLEMENT YEARS 1606, April James I of England granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish colonies in Virginia. The charter named two branches of the Company, the Virginia Company of London and the Virginia Company of Plymouth. 1606, December 20 Three ships – Susan Constant, Godspeed, and Discovery – left London with 105 men and boys to establish a colony in Virginia between 34 and 41 degrees latitude. 1607, April 26 The three ships sighted the land of Virginia, landed at Cape Henry (present day Virginia Beach) and were attacked by Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia
    2007–2010 Interim Report on the Preservation Virginia Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia Contributing Authors: David Givens, William M. Kelso, Jamie May, Mary Anna Richardson, Daniel Schmidt, & Beverly Straube William M. Kelso Beverly Straube Daniel Schmidt Editors March 2012 Structure 177 (Well) Structure 176 Structure 189 Soldier’s Pits Structure 175 Structure 183 Structure 172 Structure 187 1607 Burial Ground Structure 180 West Bulwark Ditch Solitary Burials Marketplace Structure 185 Churchyard (Cellar/Well) Excavations Prehistoric Test Ditches 28 & 29 Structure 179 Fence 2&3 (Storehouse) Ludwell Burial Structure 184 Pit 25 Slot Trenches Outlines of James Fort South Church Excavations Structure 165 Structure 160 East Bulwark Ditch 2 2 Graphics and maps by David Givens and Jamie May Design and production by David Givens Photography by Michael Lavin and Mary Anna Richardson ©2012 by Preservation Virginia and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. All rights reserved, including the right to produce this report or portions thereof in any form. 2 2 Acknowledgements (2007–2010) The Jamestown Rediscovery team, directed by Dr. William this period, namely Juliana Harding, Christian Hager, and Kelso, continued archaeological excavations at the James Matthew Balazik. Thank you to the Colonial Williamsburg Fort site from 2007–2010. The following list highlights Foundation architectural historians who have analyzed the some of the many individuals who contributed to the project fort buildings with us: Cary Carson, Willie Graham, Carl during these
    [Show full text]
  • Pocahontas's Two Rescues and Her Fluid Loyalty
    言語・地域文化研究 第 ₂6 号 2020 103 Pocahontas’s Two Rescues and Her Fluid Loyalty Hiroyuki Tsukada ポカホンタスの二つの助命と忠誠心の揺らぎ 塚田 浩幸 要 旨 ポカホンタスは、二度、ジョン・スミスの命を救った。一度目は有名な助命で、1607 年 12 月、インディアンの首長パウハタンによる処刑の寸前に、ポカホンタスが捕虜スミ スに自分の体をなげうって助命をした。これは、スミスの死と生まれ変わりを象徴的に 意味し、入植者をインディアンの世界に迎え入れる儀式で、ポカホンタスはスミスを救 うというあらかじめ決められた役割を担った。この一度目の助命の真偽については長ら く論争が行なわれてきたが、スミスが 1608 年 6 月の報告書簡でポカホンタスを「比類な き人物」と高く評価できたという事実は、助命が実際に起きたことを示している。その 6 月の時点で、スミスは助命の他に、取引や物資の提供と人質解放交渉の場面でポカホ ンタスと会う機会を持っていたが、それらの場面においては、スミスが「比類なき人物」 と評価することができるほどの行動をポカホンタスがとっていなかったからである。そ して、スミスがその報告書簡でポカホンタスを紹介したのは、入植事業の宣伝のために インディアンとの平和友好をアピールするねらいがあった。つまり、スミスに批判的な 研究者が主張するように、スミスがポカホンタスの人気にあやかって自分の名声をあげ るために助命を捏造したのではなく、助命に感銘を受けたスミスがポカホンタスの人気 を作り上げたといえるのである。 パウハタンは、一度目の助命でポカホンタスをインディアンと入植者の平和友好のシ ンボルとして仕立て上げ、その後の平和的な外交の場面にもポカホンタスを同行させて いた。しかしながら、二度目の助命は、パウハタンの外交方針に逆らって、ポカホンタ ス自身の意思によって行なわれた。1609 年 1 月、インディアンと入植者の関係が悪化す るなか、パウハタンがスミスを本当に襲おうとしているところをポカホンタスがスミス に密告して救った。この二つの助命のあいだの期間、ポカホンタスは入植者と頻繁に会 うなかで理解を深め、パウハタン連合のインディアンとしての忠誠心に揺らぎを生じさ せていたのである。つまり、ポカホンタスは、単なるパウハタンの遣いとしての平和友 好のシンボルであることをやめ、自らを平和友好の使者として確立させるに至ったので ある。 本稿の著作権は著者が保持し、クリエイティブ・コモンズ表示 4.0 国際ライセンス(CC-BY)下に提供します。 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ja 104 論文 ポカホンタスの二つの助命と忠誠心の揺らぎ (塚田 浩幸) Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. A special relationship between Pocahontas and John Smith 3. Refutation of all existing theories 4. Demonstration of the veracity of the rescue 5. Conclusion 1. Introduction Pocahontas saved John Smith twice. The frst instance came in December 1607, when she symbolically ofered her own head to save Smith’s
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown Colony Unit
    The Jamestown Colony A Teaching Unit for Kindergarten Students Prepared by: Amanda Blair Url: http://arblai.wmwikis.net Submitted as Partial Requirement for ED 405 Elementary and Middle Social Studies Curriculum and Instruction Professor Gail McEachron The College of William and Mary Spring 2009 Contents: - Historical Narrative: The Jamestown Settlement - Map/Globe Skills Lesson: A Voyage to the New World - Critical Thinking and the Arts: Portraits of Pocahontas - Civic Engagement: Pocahontas: Friend of the Settlers - Global Inquiry: Exposing the Truth in Disneyʼs Pocahontas - Assessments - Bibliography - Appendix A: National and State Standards Historical Narrative: The Jamestown Settlement Introduction The study of the Jamestown settlement is a necessity for any kindergarten through sixth grade student in the United States. This settlement was the first English stronghold in North America and planted the seeds for what would become the United States of America, a country whose culture, government, and religion stem from an English settlement and way of life. The interactions of these first settlers with the native people also set a standard for how these groups of people would be treated later on. In addition, the study of Jamestown can be implemented into just about every level of social studies. For example, Kindergarten students can study the importance of Pocahontas to the early settlers, the terms near and far as related to the start and finish of the voyage to Jamestown, and the use of inquiry to find out the truth in Disneyʼs movie on this topic. (See Appendix A) Key Ideas and Events The story of Jamestown begins with the granting of a charter by King James I to the Virginia Company of London in order to establish a settlement in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • How Cultural Factors Hastened the Population Decline of the Powhatan Indians
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2008 How Cultural Factors Hastened the Population Decline of the Powhatan Indians Julia Ruth Beckley Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/1553 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Julia Ruth Beckley, 2008 All Rights Reserved HOW CULTURAL FACTORS HASTENED THE POPULATION DECLINE OF THE POWHATAN INDIANS (1607-1699) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Virginia Commonwealth University. by JULIA RUTH BECKLEY Master of Arts in History, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2008 Bachelor of Arts in History, Christopher Newport University, 2003 Director: DR. SARAH MEACHAM PROFESSOR OF HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Director: DR. JOHN KNEEBONE PROFESSOR OF HISTORY, DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Director: DR. JOSHUA ECKHARDT PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia May 2008 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 2 ENGLISH CULTURAL FACTORS THAT
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Ralph Hamor's True Discourse to the Establishment of the English Colony in America
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1992 Selling America in the Seventeenth Century: The Contribution of Ralph Hamor's True Discourse to the Establishment of the English Colony in America Sibley Judson Smith College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Sibley Judson, "Selling America in the Seventeenth Century: The Contribution of Ralph Hamor's True Discourse to the Establishment of the English Colony in America" (1992). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625711. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-9acf-4z41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SELLING AMERICA IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY: THE CONTRIBUTION OF RALPH HAMOR'S TRUE DISCOURSE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENGLISH COLONY IN VIRGINIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the American Studies Program The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Sibley Judson Smith, Jr. November 1992 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts thor Approved, November 1992 Thad W. Tate Robert Gross Cary Cars>6h Vice-President, Research Colonial Williamsburg Foundation DEDICATION This is dedicated to the memory of my father, "S.J.” Smith, S.K.C., U.S.N., Ret., my first American Hero, who introduced me to the world of adventure in the history of our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonlit | Settling a New World: the Lost Colony of Roanoke Island
    Name: Class: Settling a New World: The Lost Colony of Roanoke Island By National Park Service 2016 The Fort Raleigh National Historic Site is dedicated to the preservation of England’s first New World settlements, as well as the cultural legacy of Native Americans, European Americans, and African Americans who lived on Roanoke Island. In 1585 and 1587, England tried its hand at establishing a colonial presence in North America under the leadership of Sir Walter Raleigh. The attempts were failures on both accounts but they would come to form one of the most puzzling mysteries in early American history: the disappearance of the Roanoke colony. As you read, take notes on what circumstances or mistakes might have put the English settlers at a disadvantage in creating a lasting colony. [1] "About the place many of my things spoiled and broken, and my books torn from the covers, the frames of some of my pictures and maps rotted and spoiled with rain, and my armor almost eaten through with rust." - John White1 on the lost colony of Roanoke Island 1584 Voyage In the late sixteenth-century, England’s primary goal in North America was to disrupt Spanish "John White discovers the word "CROATOAN" carved at Roanoke's shipping. Catholic Spain, under the rule of Philip fort palisade" by Unknown is in the public domain. II,2 had dominated the coast of Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Florida for the latter part of the 1500s. Protestant England, under the rule of Elizabeth I,3 sought to circumvent4 Spanish dominance in the region by establishing colonies in the New World.
    [Show full text]