Abstract - ID: 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abstract - ID: 3 1 Abstract - ID: 3 Authors: Lindsey Grove, Elon University; Scott Rezac, Rezac and Associates Physical Therapy, LLC Title: Manual cervical spinal mobilization improves extremity strength and paresthesia in a patient with multi-quadrant symptoms secondary to cervical myelopathy Background / Purpose: Cervical spine myelopathy (CSM) is a clinical diagnosis involving the cervical spine, spinal cord, spinal nerve roots, and other surrounding tissues that can result in various debilitating physical symptoms. Literature comparing surgical, conservative, and physical therapy outcomes is lacking. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate how physical therapy consisting of manual therapy, neural re-education, therapeutic exercise, and functional training was used to successfully treat an individual with stable CSM. Case Description: The patient was a 69-year-old Caucasian female, ¾ pack a day smoker self-referred to outpatient physical therapy for progression of paresthesias in all extremities with insidious onset 9 months prior. She had previously received a medical diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy and undergone an inconclusive EMG study. No cervical pain was reported at evaluation; however, limited cervical range of motion, palpable tenderness to C4-C7 paraspinals, mild right foot drop, gait deviation, quadriceps hyperreflexia, and a positive cervical distraction test was seen. The physical therapist made a differential diagnosis of CSM based on the presence of these clustered clinical findings and past medical history. Evaluation results were communicated to the physician who signed off on the physical therapy plan of care for stable CSM. The course of treatment consisted of 26 sessions that took place over 5 months. Outcomes: Reduction of lower extremity paresthesia was seen as early as the first session. A significant improvement of 67/80 (25% impairment) to 73/80 (7.5% impairment) in the subjects Lower Extremity Functional Scale score was observed. Right lower extremity manual muscle testing for dorsiflexor strength improved from 3/5 to 5/5. Improvements in cervical ranges of motion were noted. At discharge she was able to ambulate and perform gardening tasks for greater than 60 minutes without symptoms compared to at evaluation in which she experienced symptom onset in less than 15 minutes. Sleep quality improved from 50% to 0% disturbed at discharge. Subject reported overall return to full function. Discussion / Conclusion: Manual therapy consisting of manual cervical traction, lateral side glides at C3-C7, upper thoracic spine manipulation, and individualized extremity neural flossing techniques. Carry over for spinal segmental mobility and dynamic motor control was promoted with progressive therapeutic exercise and functional training such as deep neck flexor training coupled with lifting and bending tasks. Manual therapy interventions were utilized as indicated and tapered throughout treatment. This case report demonstrates physical therapy management of symptoms associated with CSM and may offer treatment options for future patients with stable CSM. Further research should be conducted to provide objective data to support the findings of this case report. 2 Abstract - ID: 5 Authors: Ronald Schenk, Daemen College Title: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy instruction in accredited physical therapy programs in the United States Background / Purpose: Over 10% of all medical visits are directed toward musculoskeletal pathology or impairments in the United States, and a number of these affected individuals are referred to physical therapy. Physical therapy interventions for musculoskeletal disorders may include physical agents, stabilization exercises, manual physical therapy, and an exercise prescription which is based on the testing of repeated end range movements, which is foundational to the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) approach. Often referred to as the McKenzie Method, MDT is a musculoskeletal classification based system developed by Robin McKenzie, a New Zealand physiotherapist, and the approach has been shown to be efficacious in the management of spinal musculoskeletal disorders. Despite the fact that research regarding the effectiveness of MDT is emerging, there is currently no evidence as the extent of MDT education in professional and post-professional physical therapy programs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which MDT is instructed at the professional and post-professional level. The results from this study may be of value as an assessment tool for existing curricula within the framework of a program’s educational philosophy and curricular plan. Additionally, the results may also be helpful for the development and facilitation of MDT instruction in entry-level physical therapy education programs, orthopaedic residency programs, and OMPT programs that do not currently address this content. Methods: This cross sectional study explored the extent of MDT instruction in physical therapy professional degree programs accredited by CAPTE and the American Board of Physical Therapy Residency and Fellowship Education (ABPTRFE). Three-hundred and fifty invitations to complete the survey were sent via email to program directors of physical therapy professional degree programs accredited by CAPTE and ABPTRFE. A letter of instruction was provided to each subject outlining the purpose of the study, an explanation of the anonymous nature of the survey, and that participation was voluntary. The survey included a request to forward the email to the McKenzie Institute for teaching MDT content. They were also provided with a link to complete the survey through a web-based service (Survey- Monkey.com). Summary of Findings: A total of 96 programs responded to the survey (response rate = 27.4%). Of these programs, 84 (87.5%) had integrated the McKenzie principles into their curriculum. Of the 84 respondents, 23 indicated that McKenzie principles were integrated into a required, entry-level or post-professional course, 40 indicated that it was part of the required integrated practice expectation content, and 16 did not report having an entry-level program. Faculty teaching MDT content appear to be well qualified, with the majority having more than 13 years of experience using McKenzie treatments in clinical practice. The primary reason for programs not teaching McKenzie principles is that it was not considered to be of high enough curricular priority for inclusion (n=4). Of the 96 programs that responded to the survey, eighty-four (87.5%) had integrated the McKenzie principles and practice into their entry-level education programs (Figure 1). The programs currently not teaching MDT reported several reasons, including lack of qualified faculty (n=4, 41.7), lack of scientific evidence to guide what is to be taught (n=1, 10.4), and the remainder provided individual responses within the other category, including eliminating the content to better follow low back pain clinical practice (n=1, 10.4%) and teaching concepts of McKenzie but not the entirety of the method (n=4, 41.7). Also in a separate question, all of the programs that had not integrated MDT do not plan to incorporate it into their curriculum in the future (n=12, 100%). 3 Of the 96 programs that responded to the survey, eighty-four (87.5%) had integrated the McKenzie principles and practice into their entry-level education programs (Figure 1). The programs currently not teaching MDT reported several reasons, including lack of qualified faculty (n=4, 41.7), lack of scientific evidence to guide what is to be taught (n=1, 10.4), and the remainder provided individual responses within the other category, including eliminating the content to better follow low back pain clinical practice (n=1, 10.4%) and teaching concepts of McKenzie but not the entirety of the method (n=4, 41.7). Also in a separate question, all of the programs that had not integrated MDT do not plan to incorporate it into their curriculum in the future (n=12, 100%). Discussion / Conclusion: This study examined the status of MDT education in entry-level education programs for physical therapists. To our knowledge, the results provide the first description of MDT education in entry-level education programs for physical therapists in professional and post-professional therapy programs. While most of responding programs (87.5%) stated that the McKenzie principles were currently included in their curricula, the results of our study demonstrate some variability in the educational background of the clinicians teaching and the years of experience the clinician had using MDT in clinical practice. For example, 36.23% (n=25) have completed part D of MDT training and 13.04% (n=9) of clinicians teaching MDT are diplomaed. This educational background can lead many clinicians to believe they are knowledgeable on MDT; however, only implementing extension based concepts to their patients. Of the clinicians that are instructing MDT, only 47.83% had greater than 13 years’ experience implementing MDT in clinical practice. These inconsistencies may be related to a current lack of guidelines, regulations, and standards for MDT content within educational requirements, which may be a reflection of the current variable role of the McKenzie principles in physical therapist practice. Of the 96 programs that responded to the survey, 84 programs had integrated the McKenzie principles and practice into their entry-level education programs. There appeared to be variability in how the McKenzie
Recommended publications
  • Common Problems of the Shoulder, Examination and Omt
    COMMON PROBLEMS OF THE SHOULDER, EXAMINATION AND OMT Richard Margaitis DO Assistant Professor Family Medicine/NMM/SM Florida Hospital October 19th 2015 Objectives • At the conclusion of this lecture, the attendee should be able to: Identify basic anatomic landmarks of the shoulder Identify typical patient symptoms/complaints Differentiate various medical diagnoses of the shoulder Perform & understand the indications of specific shoulder tests Identify various diagnostic and treatment modalities Perform various OMT techniques for shoulder dysfunctions Pre-Test Question #1 1) Which nerve is most commonly injured with a gleno- humeral shoulder dislocation? a) Axillary Nerve b) Suprascapular Nerve c) Musculo-cutaneous Nerve d) Radial Nerve c) Ulnar Nerve Answer: A) Axillary Nerve Pre-Test Question #2 2) How many ligaments make up the Coraco-clavicular Ligament? a) One b) Two c) Three d) Four c) Five Answer: B) Two The Conoid and Trapezoid Ligaments Pre-Test Question #3 3) Which of the following tests is used to evaluate for Bicipital Tendonitis? a) Jobe b) Apprehension c) Hawkins’ d) Apleys e) Speeds Answer: E) Speeds Pre-Test Question #4 4) How many muscles either attach or originate on the Scapula? a) 7 b) 10 c) 15 d) 17 e) 21 Answer: D) 17 Muscles attaching to or originating on the Scapula Serratus Anterior Supraspinatus Subscapularis Trapezius Teres Major Teres Minor Triceps Brachii (long head) Biceps Brachii (short & long heads) Rhomboid Major Rhomboid Minor Coracobrachialis Omohyoid (inferior belly) Latiissimus Dorsi Deltoid Levator
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Abstracts
    PAPER ABSTRACTS Paper #1 Full-Thickness Articular Cartilage Defects of the Trochlea: Long-Term Patient Outcomes at 4-6 Years . .Jon E Browne, Kansas City, MO, USA Paper #2 •Transplantation of Cartilage-Like Tissue Made by Tissue Engineering . .Mitsuo Ochi, Izumo-shi, JAPAN Paper #3 Semitendinosus Regrowth: The Physiologic Properties of the Lizard Tail Phenomenon . .Mark David Miller, Charlottesville, USA Paper #4 Failure Properties of the Fibular Collateral and Popliteofibular Ligaments, and Popliteus Musculotendinous Complex . .Tim Bollom, Gainesville, FL, USA Paper #5 The Effect of Growth Factor therapy for Over-Stretched Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury With Partial Mid-Substance Laceration: An Experimental Study . .Eiji Kondo, Sapporo, JAPAN Paper #6 Physiological Fracture Prophylaxis of the Distal Radius Prior to Falling . .Anton Arndt, Huddinge, SWEDEN Paper #7 Animated 3D Motion of the Normal and Injured Wrist . .Michael J Sandow, Adelaide, AUSTRALIA Paper #8 Tissue Engineering for Knee Ligament Reconstruction . .F. van Eijk, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS Paper #9 Changes in Gene Expression of Human Articular Chondrocytes in Cell Culture . .Gabriele Striessnig, Vienna, AUSTRIA Paper #10 Existence of Slow-Cycling Cells in Meniscus: Implication on Precursor Cells . .Eisaku Fujimoto, Hiroshima, JAPAN Paper #11 The Effects of Hyaluronic Acid in the Healing of Achilles Tendon Repair . .Sinan Karaoglu, Kayseri, TURKEY Paper #12 Superior topology of the Human Talus . .Adam M Butler, Randwick, AUSTRALIA Paper #13 Diagnosis and Arthroscopic Treatment of Superior Labrum Lesion Associated With Shoulder Anterior Instability: Slap Type V. .Benno Ejnisman, São Paulo, BRAZIL Paper #14 The Reliability of MR-Arthrography in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability . .Pol E Huysmans, Amstelveen, NETHERLANDS Paper #15 Significance of Postoperative Arthro MRI in Predicting 5 Year Results of Arthroscopically Treated Recurrent Shoulder Dislocations .
    [Show full text]
  • Souvenir Programme, This Information Is Correct
    1 SUBSPECIALTY INTEREST GROUP MEETINGS At time of printing this souvenir programme, this information is correct. Should there be any last minute changes, please refer to the signage outside each meeting room or enquire at the secretariat counter. SUBSPECIALTY INTEREST GROUP MEETING DATE TIME MEETINGS ROOM ASEAN OA Education Committee 21st May 2015 0830 - 1700hrs Kelantan Room Meeting Hand Subspecialty Interest Group 22nd May 2015 1030 - 1200hrs Pahang Room Foot & Ankle Subspecialty Interest Negeri Sembilan 22nd May 2015 1030 - 1200hrs Group Room Spine Subspecialty Interest Group 22nd May 2015 1130 - 1200hrs Johore Room Negeri Sembilan Paediatrics Subspecialty Interest Group 22nd May 2015 1400 - 1530hrs Room ASEAN OA Council Meeting 22nd May 2015 1400 - 1730hrs Kelantan Room Arthroplasty Subspecialty Interest 22nd May 2015 1600 - 1730hrs Pahang Room Group Negeri Sembilan Trauma Subspecialty Interest Group 22nd May 2015 1600 - 1730hrs Room Oncology Subspecialty Interest Group 23rd May 2015 1030 - 1200hrs Penang Room Sports Subspecialty Interest Group 23rd May 2015 1400 - 1530hrs Johore Room MOA Annual General Meeting 23rd May 2014 1600 - 1730hrs Johore Room 23rd May 2015 0800 - 1730hrs APOA Council Meeting Kelantan Room 24th May 2015 0800 - 1500hrs 2 INDEX PAGE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 Subspecialty Interest Group Meetings Malaysian Orthopaedic Association Office Bearers 4 45th Malaysian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting 2015 Organising Committee Welcome Message from President of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association and 5 Organising
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal Orthopaedics
    NEONATAL ORTHOPAEDICS NEONATAL ORTHOPAEDICS Second Edition N De Mazumder MBBS MS Ex-Professor and Head Department of Orthopaedics Ramakrishna Mission Seva Pratishthan Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences Kolkata, West Bengal, India Visiting Surgeon Department of Orthopaedics Chittaranjan Sishu Sadan Kolkata, West Bengal, India Ex-President West Bengal Orthopaedic Association (A Chapter of Indian Orthopaedic Association) Kolkata, West Bengal, India Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon Park Children’s Centre Kolkata, West Bengal, India Foreword AK Das ® JAYPEE BROTHERS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (P) LTD. New Delhi • London • Philadelphia • Panama (021)66485438 66485457 www.ketabpezeshki.com ® Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. Headquarters Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 4838/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj New Delhi 110 002, India Phone: +91-11-43574357 Fax: +91-11-43574314 Email: [email protected] Overseas Offices J.P. Medical Ltd. Jaypee-Highlights Medical Publishers Inc. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd. 83, Victoria Street, London City of Knowledge, Bld. 237, Clayton The Bourse SW1H 0HW (UK) Panama City, Panama 111, South Independence Mall East Phone: +44-2031708910 Phone: +507-301-0496 Suite 835, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA Fax: +02-03-0086180 Fax: +507-301-0499 Phone: +267-519-9789 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 17/1-B, Babar Road, Block-B, Shaymali Shorakhute, Kathmandu Mohammadpur, Dhaka-1207 Nepal Bangladesh Phone: +00977-9841528578 Mobile: +08801912003485 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.jaypeebrothers.com Website: www.jaypeedigital.com © 2013, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoulder Injuries Diagnosis and Treatment
    SHOULDER INJURIES DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT BONE AND JOINT HEALTH JASSIN M. JOURIA Dr. Jassin M. Jouria is a practicing Emergency Medicine physician, professor of academic medicine, and medical author. He graduated from Ross University School of Medicine and has completed his clinical clerkship training in various teaching hospitals throughout New York, including King’s County Hospital Center and Brookdale Medical Center, among others. Dr. Jouria has passed all USMLE medical board exams, and has served as a test prep tutor and instructor for Kaplan. He has developed several medical courses and curricula for a variety of educational institutions. Dr. Jouria has also served on multiple levels in the academic field including faculty member and Department Chair. Dr. Jouria continues to serve as a Subject Matter Expert for several continuing education organizations covering multiple basic medical sciences. He has also developed several continuing medical education courses covering various topics in clinical medicine. Recently, Dr. Jouria has been contracted by the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital’s Department of Surgery to develop an e- module training series for trauma patient management. Dr. Jouria is currently authoring an academic textbook on Human Anatomy & Physiology. ABSTRACT Over time, the potential for injury or just general wear and tear on bones and joints can impact a person’s quality of life. Even in younger individuals, repetitive activities, such as repeatedly throwing a baseball, can cause arthritic pain and joint tears that cause pain and limit a person’s body to function as it was designed. However, many treatment options, both surgical and non-surgical, are available to provide relief and to restore normal functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoracolumbar Spine
    THORACOLUMBAR SPINE Code No. TITTLE Running Serial No. time (Description) Minutes 29028 Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy, Current 15:00 TL.S practice 1 Designed to teach the operative technique of percutaneous lumbar discectomy & to point out the importance of correct positioning of the instrument in order to avoid neural injury & achieve better evacuation of the posteriorly lodged fragments. 22046 Anterior Approaches to the Lumbar Spine TL.S Demonstrates the anterior lumbar spine 2 anatomy & the anterior retroperitoneal, anterior transperitoneal & anterolateral flank surgical approaches. The anterior lumbar arthrodesis is shown through cadaveric dissection, graphics & models. 22044 Anterior Retroperitioneal Approach & TL.S Fusion of the Lumbar Spine. 3 Demonstrates anterior retroperitoneal approach which provides direct access to the spine, as well as the intervening discs between the diaphragm & the sacrum. The approach is utilized for traumatic, infectious, degenerative, congenital & developmental anomalies of the lumbar spine. 21029 Anterior Spinal Canal Decompression & TL.S Interbody Fusion for Treatment of 4 Herniated Thoracic Disks 21028 Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy TL.S 5 21030 Evaluation of the Scoliosis Patient 38:00 TL.S Demonstrates the proper method of 6 evaluating the adolescent scoliosis patient, using physical examination & radiological evaluation & emphasizing the use of the spinal & neurologic evaluation. 29029 Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for TL.S single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis 7 Demonstrates the classic technique of Cotrel- Dubousset instrumentation for a flexible right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. 22045 Laminotomy/I) disketomy Surgical TL.S Technique with the patient in kneeling 8 position 22047 Microscopic Lumbar Laminectomy 38:00 TL.S With vedio camera 9 20009 The Nulceotome procedure in Automated TL.S Percutaneous Lumbar discectomy 10 Discusses the indications & contraindications for percutaneous discectomy & provides a step by step illustration of the procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Subacromial Decompression in the Shoulder
    Subacromial Decompression Geoffrey S. Van Thiel, Matthew T. Provencher, Shane J. Nho, and Anthony A. Romeo PROCEDURE 2 22 Indications P ITFALLS ■ Impingement symptoms refractory to at least • There are numerous possible 3 months of nonoperative management causes of shoulder pain that can ■ In conjunction with arthroscopic treatment of a mimic impingement symptoms. All potential causes should be rotator cuff tear thoroughly evaluated prior to ■ Relative indication: type II or III acromion with undertaking operative treatment clinical fi ndings of impingement of isolated impingement syndrome. Examination/Imaging Subacromial Decompression PHYSICAL EXAMINATION ■ Assess the patient for Controversies • Complete shoulder examination with range of • Subacromial decompression in motion and strength the treatment of rotator cuff • Tenderness with palpation over anterolateral pathology has been continually acromion and supraspinatus debated. Prospective studies • Classic Neer sign with anterolateral shoulder have suggested that there is no difference in outcomes with and pain on forward elevation above 90° when without subacromial the greater tuberosity impacts the anterior decompression. acromion (and made worse with internal rotation) • Subacromial decompression • Positive Hawkins sign: pain with internal rotation, performed in association with a forward elevation to 90°, and adduction, which superior labrum anterior- causes impingement against the coracoacromial posterior (SLAP) repair can potentially increase ligament postoperative stiffness. ■ The impingement test is positive if the patient experiences pain relief with a subacromial injection of lidocaine. ■ Be certain to evaluate for acromioclavicular (AC) joint pathology, and keep in mind that there are several causes of shoulder pain that can mimic impingement syndrome. P ITFALLS IMAGING • Ensure that an axillary lateral ■ Standard radiographs should be ordered, view is obtained to rule out an os acromiale.
    [Show full text]
  • Refers to the Page of the Administrative Record Filed by Defendant with Its Answer
    Case: 4:13-cv-00611-SNLJ Doc. #: 28 Filed: 07/03/14 Page: 1 of 35 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TERESA A. FLORES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:13CV611SNLJ ) (TIA) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This cause is on appeal from an adverse ruling of the Social Security Administration. The suit involves an Application for a Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Claimant has filed a Brief in Support of her Complaint; the Commissioner has filed a Brief in Support of her Answer. The case was referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). I. Procedural History On March 22, 2005, Claimant Teresa A. Flores filed an Application for a Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et. seq. (Tr. 15, 910-14)1 alleging disability since June 30, 2004 due to left shoulder pain, muscle spasms, and knots in shoulder blade. (Tr. 959, 964). The application was denied, and Claimant subsequently requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), which was held on November 16, 2006. (Tr. 31). In a decision dated April 17, 2007, the ALJ issued a partially 1"Tr." refers to the page of the administrative record filed by Defendant with its Answer. (Docket No. 10/filed June 7, 2013). Case: 4:13-cv-00611-SNLJ Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation Following Posterior Shoulder Stabilization
    Goldenberg BT, Goldsten P, Lacheta L, Arner JW, Provencher MT, Millett PJ. Rehabilitation Following Posterior Shoulder Stabilization. IJSPT. 2021;16(3):930-940. doi:10.26603/001c.22501 Clinical Commentary/Current Concept Review Rehabilitation Following Posterior Shoulder Stabilization Brandon T Goldenberg, MD 1, Pamela Goldsten, DPT, OCS 2, Lucca Lacheta, MD 3, Justin W Arner, MD 4, Matthew T a Provencher, MD, MC, USNR 5, Peter J Millett, MD, MSc 5 1 Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 2 Howard Head Sports Medicine, 3 Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 4 The Steadman Clinic, 5 The Steadman Clinic; Steadman Philippon Research Institute Keywords: movement system, physical therapy, posterior shoulder instability, rehabilitation https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.22501 International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 16, Issue 3, 2021 Posterior shoulder instability has been noted in recent reports to occur at a higher prevalence than originally believed, with many cases occurring in active populations. In most cases, primary surgical treatment for posterior shoulder instability—a posterior labral repair—is indicated for those patients who have failed conservative management and demonstrate persistent functional limitations. In order to optimize surgical success and return to a prior level of function, a comprehensive and focused rehabilitation program is crucial. Currently, there is a limited amount of literature focusing on rehabilitation after surgery for posterior instability. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to present a post-surgical rehabilitation program for patients following posterior shoulder labral repair, with recommendations based upon best medical evidence. Level of Evidence 5 INTRODUCTION covery and facilitate return to full activity. Currently, there is limited literature regarding post-operative rehabilitation Posterior shoulder instability has historically accounted for after surgical management for posterior instability.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoulder Examination
    DiagnosticDiagnostic andand ManagementManagement ApproachApproach toto thethe PainfulPainful ShoulderShoulder IntroductionIntroduction What conditions causing shoulder pain commonly present in General Practice? Subacromial impingement Rotator cuff tears AC joint pathology Adhesive capsulitis (Instability) IntroductionIntroduction How do we discriminate between these conditions? History Acute/gradual onset Distribution of pain Activities worsening the pain Activity restrictions Night pain Examination SubacromialSubacromial ImpingementImpingement Impingement beneath coracoacromial arch Intrinsic – Cuff thickening/bursitis Extrinsic – Instability – young – Subacromial spurs – old Pain with activity above shoulder height (and at night) Painful arc of abduction (“hitch”) Positive impingement signs AdhesiveAdhesive CapsulitisCapsulitis Capsule sticks to humeral head GLOBAL RESTRICTION ROM NIGHT PAIN Cause often unknown – but beware diabetes Painful 6/12 Restrictive 6/12 Resolution 6/12 ACAC JointJoint PathologyPathology Pain with activity (esp overhead, or weight training) AC Jt tender Crepitus/clicking Deformity RotatorRotator CuffCuff TearTear Requires force Supraspinatus > Infraspinatus > subscapularis Reduced function and night pain Painful arc (“hitch”) Drop test ExaminationExamination ofof thethe PainfulPainful ShoulderShoulder Observation Abduction (180deg) – scapular winging Anterior – glenohumeral rhythm (2: 1) SCJ – hitch Clavicle Forward flexion (180deg) ACJ – winging Shoulder height – rhythm
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Clinical Vignettes a Case Based Text
    Leading the world to better health MUSCULOSKELETAL CLINICAL VIGNETTES A CASE BASED TEXT Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RCSI Department of General Practice, RCSI Department of Rheumatology, Beaumont Hospital O’Byrne J, Downey R, Feeley R, Kelly M, Tiedt L, O’Byrne J, Murphy M, Stuart E, Kearns G. (2019) Musculoskeletal clinical vignettes: a case based text. Dublin, Ireland: RCSI. ISBN: 978-0-9926911-8-9 Image attribution: istock.com/mashuk CC Licence by NC-SA MUSCULOSKELETAL CLINICAL VIGNETTES Incorporating history, examination, investigations and management of commonly presenting musculoskeletal conditions 1131 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RCSI Prof. John O'Byrne Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RCSI Dr. Richie Downey Prof. John O'Byrne Mr. Iain Feeley Dr. Richie Downey Dr. Martin Kelly Mr. Iain Feeley Dr. Lauren Tiedt Dr. Martin Kelly Department of General Practice, RCSI Dr. Lauren Tiedt Dr. Mark Murphy Department of General Practice, RCSI Dr Ellen Stuart Dr. Mark Murphy Department of Rheumatology, Beaumont Hospital Dr Ellen Stuart Dr Grainne Kearns Department of Rheumatology, Beaumont Hospital Dr Grainne Kearns 2 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RCSI Prof. John O'Byrne Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, RCSI Dr. Richie Downey TABLE OF CONTENTS Prof. John O'Byrne Mr. Iain Feeley Introduction ............................................................. 5 Dr. Richie Downey Dr. Martin Kelly General guidelines for musculoskeletal physical Mr. Iain Feeley examination of all joints .................................................. 6 Dr. Lauren Tiedt Dr. Martin Kelly Upper limb ............................................................. 10 Department of General Practice, RCSI Example of an upper limb joint examination ................. 11 Dr. Lauren Tiedt Shoulder osteoarthritis ................................................. 13 Dr. Mark Murphy Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) ............................ 16 Department of General Practice, RCSI Dr Ellen Stuart Shoulder rotator cuff pathology ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmaster Musculoskeletal Clinical Skills Manual 1E
    McMaster Musculoskeletal Clinical Skills Manual Authors Samyuktha Adiga Dr. Raj Carmona, MBBS, FRCPC Illustrator Jenna Rebelo Editors Caitlin Lees Dr. Raj Carmona, MBBS, FRCPC In association with the Medical Education Interest Group Narendra Singh and Jacqueline Ho (co-chairs) FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The McMaster Musculoskeletal Clinical Skills Manual was produced by members of the Medical Education Interest Group (co-chairs Jacqueline Ho and Narendra Singh), and Dr. Raj Carmona, Assistant Professor of Medicine at McMaster University. Samyuktha Adiga and Dr. Carmona wrote the manual. Illustrations were done by Jenna Rebelo. Editing was performed by Caitlin Lees and Dr. Carmona. The Manual, completed in August 2012, is a supplement to the McMaster MSK Examination Video Series created by Dr. Carmona, and closely follows the format and content of these videos. The videos are available on Medportal (McMaster students), and also publicly accessible at RheumTutor.com and fhs.mcmaster.ca/medicine/rheumatology. McMaster Musculoskeletal Clinical Skills Manual S. Adiga, J. Rebelo, C. Lees, R. Carmona McMaster Musculoskeletal Clinical Skills Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS General Guide 1 Hip Examination 3 Knee Examination 6 Ankle and Foot Examination 12 Examination of the Back 15 Shoulder Examination 19 Elbow Examination 24 Hand and Wrist Examination 26 Appendix: Neurological Assessment 29 1 GENERAL GUIDE (Please see videos for detailed demonstration of examinations) Always wash your hands and then introduce yourself to the patient. As with any other exam, ensure adequate exposure while respecting patient's modesty. Remember to assess gait whenever doing an examination of the back or any part of the lower limbs. Inspection follows the format: ● S welling ● E rythema ● A trophy ● D eformities ● S cars, skin changes, etc.
    [Show full text]