High Performing Precast Concrete Building Enclosures: Rain Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

High Performing Precast Concrete Building Enclosures: Rain Control John Straube, Ph.D., P.Eng. Building Science Corporation www.buildingscience.com Page | 2 High Performing Precast Concrete Building Enclosures: Rain Control John Straube, Ph.D., P.Eng. Building Science Corporation www.BuildingScience.com Introduction Precast concrete has been used successfully to provide durable building enclosures for many decades. As requirements for thermal performance, air leakage and rain penetration control increase in modern buildings, designers are often considering precast concrete to provide a low maintenance, durable, long life solution. Although the exceptional durability of concrete is well understood and has increased over the last 50 years, rain control theory has advanced and there have been radical changes in the expectations for thermal and airflow performance. Precast concrete enclosure walls stand apart from most “rainscreen” walls in several key respects: how they control rain penetration, how they provide airtightness, and their sequence of construction. This paper reviews the requirements for high performance enclosures as they apply to precast concrete, with special emphasis on the control of rainwater penetration. Building Enclosure Requirements The building enclosure is defined as the physical component of a building that separates the interior environment from the exterior environment: it is an environmental separator. In practice, the building enclosure has to provide the “skin” to the building, i.e., not just the environmental separation but also the visible façade. Unlike the superstructure or the service systems of buildings, the enclosure is always visible, and therefore of critical importance to owners, occupants, and the public. The appearance and operation of the enclosure has a major influence on the interior environment and on factors such as comfort, energy efficiency, durability, and occupant productivity, satisfaction and health. Page | 3 Figure 1: Attention to detail will ensure precast concrete wall panels provide high-performance enclosures. In general, the physical function of environmental separation can be further grouped into three useful sub-categories as follows: 1. Support, i.e., to support, resist, transfer and otherwise accommodate all structural loading imposed by the interior and exterior environments, by the enclosure, and by the building itself. The enclosure, or portions of it, can sometimes be an integral part of the building superstructure either by design or in actual performance. 2. Control, i.e., to control, block, regulate and/or moderate all the loadings due to the separation of the interior and exterior environments. This largely means the flow of mass (rain, air, water vapor, pollutants, etc.) and energy (heat, sound, fire, light, etc.). 3. Finish, i.e., to finish the surfaces at the interface of the enclosure with the interior and exterior environments. Each of the two interfaces must meet the relevant Page | 4 visual, aesthetic, durability and other performance requirements. All practical enclosures must satisfy support, control, and finish functions, however, only the support and control functions are needed everywhere. Control and support functions must continue across every penetration, every interface and every assembly. The lack of this continuity is the cause of the vast majority of enclosure performance problems. The need for finish varies - it is unlikely to find an enclosure that requires a finish on the interior and exterior everywhere. The support function is of primary importance. Without structural integrity, the remaining functions are of no use. The industry has reached a high level of understanding and accomplishment in this area. For physical performance, the most common required enclosure control functions include resistance to: rain penetration, air flow, heat transfer, condensation, fire & smoke propagation, sound and light transmission (including view, solar heat, and daylight), insect infestation and particulate penetration, and human access. As these functions are required everywhere, continuity of these control functions, especially at penetrations, connections and interfaces between materials, is critical to a successful enclosure. The most important control function with respect to durability is rain control followed by airflow control, thermal control, and vapour control. The level of fire and sound control required varies with code requirements and owner requirements. Unlike the control and support functions, which rely on continuity to achieve performance, the finish function is optional, and may not be needed in some areas, such as above suspended ceilings or in service or industrial spaces where the finish is often deemed unimportant. Exterior finish components are often termed “cladding”, but the term is imprecise, since cladding systems and materials often include some control functions (such as UV control, solar control, impact resistance, etc) while also serving their finish function. As the most important control function, the control of rain penetration deserves special attention in all designs. This document focuses on the rain control of wall systems in general, and precast concrete walls in particular. The Ontario Association of Architects commissioned the Rain Penetration Control Practice Guide (Straube 2005) in response to a rise in insurance claims with certain types of claddings. The guide clearly indicated that some types of enclosure systems do not need to be drained (e.g., glass, precast, low-slope roofs), although it has often been misinterpreted to mean all walls must be drained or even all walls must be “rain screens”. It does recommend the use of drained window openings, and the use of drained, two-stage joints. To supplement the guide, and avoid misunderstanding, a short review of rain control principles is provided next. Page | 5 Rain Control Principles There are three recognized design strategies to control rain penetration within and through the enclosure (Straube & Burnett 1999, CMHC 1999): Storage: Mass or storage is the oldest strategy. Like drained systems, this approach assumes water will penetrate past the outer surface of the enclosure. It requires the use of an assembly of materials with enough moisture storage capacity and moisture tolerance to absorb all rainwater that is not drained from the outer surface. In a functional mass / storage wall, this moisture is eventually removed by evaporative drying from both the inside and outside before it reaches the inner surface of the wall as a liquid. Although enclosures employing this strategy might be best termed "moisture storage" systems, "mass" is often used because a large quantity of material is required to provide sufficient storage. The maximum quantity of rain that can be controlled is limited by the storage capacity available relative to drying conditions. Some examples of mass systems include adobe walls, thatched roofs, solid multi-wythe brick masonry, and single-wythe block masonry that is still employed for some modern buildings. Figure 2: Mass (or storage) enclosure wall assemblies Drained enclosures assume some rain water will penetrate the outer surface (hence the cladding “screens” the rain) and therefore the assembly must be designed to remove this water by providing drainage (comprised of a capillary breaking drainage plane, a drainage gap, flashing, and weep hole/drain). Many cladding systems, such as brick veneer and stucco, leak, as do the joints between other cladding types, such as shakes, terra-cotta, small metal panels, or natural stone. For these cladding types drainage is a practical and successful system of rain penetration control. Page | 6 Figure 3: “Screened” and Drained enclosure walls The term “rain screen” is applied to some drained systems, but the term is imprecise, as it means different things to different people. Drained walls may also be vented (a single, or single line of openings in the cladding connected to the exterior), ventilated (at least two openings through the cladding usually distributed between the top and bottom of the cavity), or even pressure-moderated (the air pressure in vented & ventilated walls tends to follow the exterior wind pressure, thereby “moderating the pressure”). Rain screen is applied loosely to all three different types of drained walls. As drained systems can accommodate a range of claddings and backup systems, this approach to rain control has justifiably received a lot of attention from researchers and practitioners. However, drained systems are not always appropriate or the best strategy if good rain penetration control is desired. Existing multi-wythe solid masonry walls, glazing panels, and large-format precast panels are three common wall components that perform better if a strategy other than drainage is used. Page | 7 Figure 4: Small-format, handset precast installed as drained system Perfect Barrier systems stop all water penetration at a single plane. Such perfect control required the advent of modern materials. Because it is difficult to build and maintain a perfect barrier with many materials, it is common to recommend the use of drained walls. However, some systems, usually factory built, provide wall elements that are practical perfect barriers. For example, architectural precast concrete can be considered watertight, as can glazing, and roof membranes (See Figure 5). The joints between perfect barrier elements should almost always be drained joints in the form of two-stage sealant
Recommended publications
  • Types of Piles: Their Characteristics and General Use BERNARD A

    Types of Piles: Their Characteristics and General Use BERNARD A

    Types of Piles: Their Characteristics and General Use BERNARD A. GRAND, Hardesty and Hanover This paper presents a review of the current practice and usage of the numerous types of pile in general construction. Information on this sub­ ject was obtained from a review of existing literature and from field ex­ perience. The paper reviews the purpose of pile foundations and the various factors involved in the selection of a type of pile.. Emphasis is placed on the general, physical, and structural characteristics of the piles as well as durability and fabrication. Data are presented on the inherent advantages and disadvantages of the various types of piles and on corre­ sponding optimum pile length and load range. Information and data are presented on the field problems of pile installations and the proper meth­ od of handling and treabnent to avoid damage or failure of critical pile sections. The fundamental information is supplemented by case histories. •PILE FOUNDATIONS of timber were in use in ancient times. In its earliest form, a pile foundation consisted of rows of timber stakes driven into the ground. Pile founda­ tions such as these were used by the ancient Aztecs in North America. The Romans made frequent use of pile foundations as recorded by Vitruvius in 59 AD. Pile founda­ tions for ancient Roman dwellings have been found in Lake Lucerne. It is reported that during the rule of Julius Caesar a pile-supported bridge was constructed across the Rhine River. The durability of timber piles is illustrated ill the report of the reconstruction of an ancient bridge in Venice in 1902.
  • Rational Design of Hollow Core Planks for Fire Resistance

    Rational Design of Hollow Core Planks for Fire Resistance

    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 2012, 3 (5):2830-2836 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Rational design of hollow core planks for fire resistance Md Azree Othuman Mydin and Mahyuddin Ramli School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The utilization of precast hollow core plank systems in multi-storey buildings is prevalent these days. This is due to small onsite labour cost and high quality control. Precast hollow core planks are most extensively known for providing economical, efficient floor and roof systems. When properly matched for alignment, the voids in a hollow core planks may perhaps be utilized for electrical or mechanical runs. Among different precast plank systems, prestressed hollow core planks are the most well accepted system because of their lightweight nature and the economical use of concrete. Yet the structural behaviour of such systems under fire exposure is not clear-cut to be predicted because of the complex geometry, composite construction and an extensive range of possible support conditions. The aim of this paper is to discuss the characteristics of hollow core planks and the advantages of this system. Additionally, evaluation on the requirements and recommendations to the fire design of concrete planks from different standards will also be presented. These requirements will form the framework of future research focuses on providing a new method for the fire design of structures with hollowcore concrete plank systems. Keywords : Precast planks, flooring system, slab system, fire design, hollow core slab, fire resistance _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION The precast concrete plank systems are becoming established and well accepted in many countries throughout the world due to low onsite labour cost and high quality control.
  • Construction of Tremie Concrete Cutoff Wall, Wolf Creek Dam, Kentucky

    Construction of Tremie Concrete Cutoff Wall, Wolf Creek Dam, Kentucky

    c / y (y ¥ f t D n a a n in_r uir D 0!ID§Ii I <__ -j M IS C E L L A N E O U S PAPER SL-80-10 CONSTRUCTION OF TREMIE CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL, WOLF CREEK DAM, KENTUCKY by Terence C. Holland, Joseph R. Turner Structures Laboratory U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station P. O. Box 631, Vicksburg, Miss. 39180 September 1980 Final Report Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited Prepared for Office, Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army TA Washington, D. C. 20314 7 .W34m Under C W IS 3 I5 5 3 SL-80-10 1980 », Ar ' \ 8 ;v ;>"* % * OCT 2 7 1980 Water & : as Service Denver, Colorado Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. SURÈAU OF RECLAMATrON DENVER u *W ff \& A /P 92059356 \y£ ,\s> , *c£p £ > b <0 Unclassified V * ie05*l35Ï.V SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered) O' READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER Miscellaneous Paper SL-80-10 ' 4. T I T L E (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED V CONSTRUCTION OF TREMIE CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL, Final report WOLF CREEK DAM, KENTUCKY 6.
  • Architectural Precast Concrete Joint Details

    Architectural Precast Concrete Joint Details

    ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE JOINT DETAILS Reported by PCI Committee on Architectural Precast Concrete Joint Details Raymond J. Schutz Chairman James Engleҟ Albert Litvin James G. Grossҟ R. L. Pare Abraham GutmanҟJohn S. Parrish J. A. Hansonҟ Irwin J. Speyer Kai Holbekҟ Ivan L. Varkay Felix Kulkaҟ Lloyd Wright Correct joint design and proper selection of materials and installation are vital for the successful performance and esthetic appeal of precast concrete wall systems. This report recommends the proper precast concrete joint details and sealants for specific situations. In writing these recommendations, architectural treatment and economy in mold design were considered but are not included, since these are covered in the PCI Manual on Architectural Precast Concrete. Following these recommendations will result in a good design and a durable, waterproof, and economical joint. 10 CONTENTS Chapter1—Joint design ................................... 12 1.1 Scope 1.2 Types of joints 1.3 General design concepts for joints 1.4 Number of joints 1.5 Location of joints Chapter 2—Planning check lists ............................ 14 2.1 Definitions 2.2 Joint planning 2.3 Water runoff planning Chapter3—Joint details ................................... 15 3.1 General 3.2 One-stage joints 3.3 Two-stage joints 3.4 Cavity wall 3.5 Floor and roof slab joints 3.6 Precast parapets 3.7 Precast panel window details Chapter 4—Sealant materials ............................... 24 4.1 General 4.2 Field-molded sealants and their uses 4.3 Accessory materials 4.4 Preformed sealants and their uses 4.5 Compression seals and their uses 4.6 Joint design 4.7 Determination of joint movements and locations 4.8 Selection of butt joint widths for field-molded sealants 4.9 Selection of butt joint shape for field-molded sealants 4.10 Selection of size of compression seals for butt joints 4.11 Limitations on butt joint widths and movements for various types of sealants 4.12 Lap joint sealant thickness References ..............................................
  • Effects of Half-Precast Concrete Slab System on Construction Productivity

    Effects of Half-Precast Concrete Slab System on Construction Productivity

    sustainability Article Effects of Half-Precast Concrete Slab System on Construction Productivity Kyuman Cho 1, Young-su Shin 2 and Taehoon Kim 1,* 1 School of Architecture, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea; [email protected] 2 Manager, Kunwon Engineering, Seoul 05855, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-62-230-7145 Received: 6 July 2017; Accepted: 17 July 2017; Published: 19 July 2017 Abstract: A half-precast concrete slab system (HPCSS) is reported to exhibit excellent structural performance when compared with traditional slab systems. However, there is a lack of extant research examining the construction issues of an HPCSS. Thus, in this study, we analyze the construction process and productivity of applying an HPCSS by using a simulation method with the data collected from an actual construction case. The results indicate that (i) the construction productivity of HPCSS is 1.7 times that of a traditional slab system, (ii) the cost per productivity unit of HPCSS exceeds that of a traditional slab system, and (iii) critical resources affecting the HPCSS productivity include form crew and rebar crew. The results of this study suggest that it is possible to develop an optimal construction plan of a construction site in which an HPCSS is installed, and that the HPCSS can be actively applied in the future. Keywords: half-precast concrete slab system; construction productivity; construction simulation 1. Introduction The construction industry is a highly labor-intensive industry facing several issues, including low productivity and construction quality. In order to overcome such problems, several researchers and practitioners have attempted to develop various methods to facilitate mechanical or manufactured procurements for a part of a facility, and this has subsequently led to the proliferation of automation technology in construction.
  • Analysis and Design of Precast Concrete Cofferdams

    Analysis and Design of Precast Concrete Cofferdams

    Jared Spaans and Goran V. Milutinovic New lock at Kentucky Dam: Analysis and design of precast concrete cofferdams offerdams are traditionally constructed with steel. Several projects in the United States, including bridges where the cofferdam provided dry space C 1,2 for bridge pier foundation construction and locks where the cofferdam provided dry space for placement of mass ■ This paper discusses the structural analysis and concrete, however, have successfully been completed with design of precast concrete cofferdams through all precast concrete cofferdams. Analysis and design of concrete construction stages using one example and brings cofferdams, however, are not extensive in the literature. The attention to the innovative and successful use of pre- goal of this paper is to discuss the structural analysis and de- cast concrete cofferdams. sign of precast concrete cofferdams through all construction stages using one example and bring attention to the innova- ■ Design of the precast concrete cofferdam segments tive and successful use of precast concrete cofferdams. accounted for four different loading conditions: lift- ing and lowering while suspended from above; being This paper summarizes structural analysis and design for supported by piles on the four corners; resisting each stage of the concrete cofferdam during the construction lateral pressure outward from concrete placement of the new lock at the Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River around the bottom perimeter; and resisting the water near Paducah, Ky. Also, an adequate crack
  • UFGS 04 20 00 Unit Masonry

    UFGS 04 20 00 Unit Masonry

    ************************************************************************** USACE / NAVFAC / AFCEC / NASA UFGS-04 20 00 (November 2015) Change 2 - 05/19 ------------------------------------ Preparing Activity: USACE Superseding UFGS-04 20 00 (February 2011) UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS References are in agreement with UMRL dated July 2021 ************************************************************************** SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 04 - MASONRY SECTION 04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY 11/15, CHG 2: 05/19 PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 REFERENCES 1.2 SUBMITTALS 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE 1.3.1 Masonry Mock-Up Panels 1.3.1.1 Mock-Up Panel Location 1.3.1.2 Mock-Up Panel Configuration 1.3.1.3 Mock-Up Panel Composition 1.3.1.4 Mock-Up Panel Construction Method 1.3.1.5 Mock-Up Panel Purpose 1.3.2 Special Masonry Inspector Qualifications 1.4 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING 1.4.1 Masonry Units 1.4.2 Reinforcement, Anchors, and Ties 1.4.3 Cementitious Materials, Sand and Aggregates 1.5 PROJECT/SITE CONDITIONS 1.5.1 Hot Weather Procedures 1.5.2 Cold Weather Procedures PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 2.1.1 Design - Specified Compressive Strength of Masonry 2.1.2 Performance - Verify Masonry Compressive Strength 2.2 MANUFACTURED UNITS 2.2.1 General Requirements 2.2.2 Clay or Shale Brick 2.2.2.1 General 2.2.2.1.1 Sample Submittal 2.2.2.1.2 Uniformity 2.2.2.1.3 Recycled Content 2.2.2.1.4 Efflorescence Test 2.2.2.2 Solid Clay or Shale Brick SECTION 04 20 00 Page 1 2.2.2.3 Hollow Clay or Shale Brick 2.2.2.4 Refractory Brick 2.2.2.5 Glazed Brick and
  • Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels: Their Technological Evolution, Significance, and Preservation

    Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels: Their Technological Evolution, Significance, and Preservation

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2016 Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels: Their Technological Evolution, Significance, and Preservation Grace Meloy University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Meloy, Grace, "Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels: Their Technological Evolution, Significance, and Preservation" (2016). Theses (Historic Preservation). 608. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/608 Suggested Citation: Meloy, Grace (2016). Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels: Their Technological Evolution, Significance, and Preservation. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/608 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels: Their Technological Evolution, Significance, and Preservation Abstract Architectural precast concrete wall panels played an important role in mid-twentieth century architecture by providing a concrete technology that could be applied to the curtain wall system of construction utilized in this time period. Moreover, the precasting process, which enabled the controlled production of expressive facing concrete mixes and surface treatments and finishes, made this a concrete technology that could contribute to the architectural
  • ACI 302.1R-15: Guide to Concrete Floor

    ACI 302.1R-15: Guide to Concrete Floor

    The attached excerpted resource materials have been made available for use within ACI University. To obtain a full version of this document, please visit the ACI Store. For additional education products, please visit ACI University. ACI 302.1R-15 Guide to Concrete Floor and Slab Construction Reported by Committee 302 Joseph F. Neuber Jr., Chair Russell E. Neudeck, Secretary Patrick J. Harrison, Vice Chair Dennis C. Ahal Jerry A. Holland Nigel K. Parkes Carl Bimel* Bryan M. Birdwell Philip S. Kopf William S. Phelan Michael A. Clark Peter A. Craig Steve R. Lloyd, Sr. Tim H. Robinson William C. Panarese Allen Face Kevin A. MacDonald John W. Rohrer Brian J. Pashina C. Rick Felder Arthur W. McKinney Paul A. Rouis, III Boyd C. Ringo* Edward B. Finkel Donald M. McPhee Domenick Thomas Ruttura Barry E. Foreman Scott C. Metzger Bruce A. Suprenant *Deceased Greg K. Fricks Jeffrey S. Miller Scott M. Tarr Terry J. Fricks Scott L. Niemitalo Consulting Members The quality of a concrete floor or slab is highly dependent on on every project, and that such an occurrence does not necessarily achieving a hard and durable surface that is flat, relatively free reflect adversely on either the adequacy of the floor’s design or the of cracks, and at the proper grade and elevation. Properties of the quality of its construction (Ytterberg 1987). surface are determined by the mixture proportions and the quality This guide describes how to produce high-quality concrete slabs- of the concreting and jointing operations. The timing of concreting on-ground and suspended floors for various classes of service.
  • Precast Concrete – Environmentally Aware

    Precast Concrete – Environmentally Aware

    [Year] Precast Concrete – Environmentally Aware How Green is my Concrete? Even when it's grey, concrete is green. Precast concrete's environmentally friendly features make it a building material of choice for sustainability.... meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Whilst the manufacture of cement and concrete materials can contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, concrete is recognised as a material that is around for the long haul – tens if not potentially hundreds of years. Whilst it may have an “upfront” cost in carbon, over a longer life when other materials may get pulled down and rebuilt several times (and be sent to waste/landfill), concrete just keeps on keeping on. We also strive to make sure your precast concrete is made as efficiently as possible, locally and with minimal waste in the process, and with environmental and efficiency benefits realized wherever possible. Hudson Civil Products embrace the use of local products to minimize transport, undertakes various recycling and reuse projects as part of our waste stream management process, and have found solutions in a variety of other potential waste products being re-used and diverted for our use. Hudson Civil are continually looking for ways to improve the efficiency of our processes, recycle materials and even use industrial waste to produce eco-friendly concrete, including: 1. Source and use of appropriate local aggregates and materials to create suitable local-benefit concrete 2. Use local materials wherever possible, minimizing mixes with a minimum of “travel miles” to lower carbon emissions through reduced transport inputs, or both components and finished products.
  • Advances in Precast Concrete Sandwich Panels Toward Energy Efficient Structural Buildings

    Advances in Precast Concrete Sandwich Panels Toward Energy Efficient Structural Buildings

    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 8 October 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201810.0147.v1 Review Advances in Precast Concrete Sandwich Panels toward Energy Efficient Structural Buildings Sani Mohammed Bida 1,2, Farah Nora Aznieta Abdul Aziz 1,*, Mohd Saleh Jaafar 1, Farzad Hejazi 1, Abu Bakar Nabilah 1 1 Housing Research Centre (HRC), Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Federal Polytechnic Bida, PMB 55, Bida, Niger State, Nigeria 1 Affiliation 1,2; [email protected] 2 Affiliation 1; [email protected] 2 Affiliation 1; [email protected] 2 Affiliation 1; [email protected] 2 Affiliation 1; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected], [email protected] ; Tel.: +60-012-702-0786 Abstract: Precast concrete sandwich panels (PCSP) are energy efficient building system that are achieved through an insulation layer created between the concrete wythes. The insulation layer is usually of low bearing strength material making it more applicable for non-structural building systems. Hence, shear connectors are introduced to improve its structural capacity, which subsequently degrade it thermal performance by serving as thermal bridges across the panel. This article review researches of alternative materials and methods used to improve the thermal efficiency as well as reduced the strength loss due to insulation in PCSP. The alternative materials are basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP), carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), and foam concrete which are selected due to their low thermal conductivity for use in shear connection. While thermal path method has been used to prevent the effect of thermal bridges.
  • Light Weight Precast Concrete Panel by Using Polystyrene

    Light Weight Precast Concrete Panel by Using Polystyrene

    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print): 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Website: www.ijirset.com Vol. 6, Issue 4, April 2017 Light Weight Precast Concrete Panel by Using Polystyrene Kothari Akash1, Chaudhari Balasaheb2, U.G. Students, Department of Civil Engineering, JSPM’s B.I.T Engineering College, Barshi, India1, 2 ABSTRACT:-This paper present of an experimental study on the effect of using industrial waste Polystyrene as a potential aggregate in light weight precast concrete panel. Also in place of natural sand, crush sand stone were used. The effect of Polystyrene aggregate on several properties of concrete were investigated. For this purpose, five series of concrete sample were prepared. The polystyrene aggregate was used as a replacement of natural aggregate, at the level of 40%, 50%, 60%, by volume and crush sand stone was also replaced by polystyrene at the level of 10%,20% by volume. The 7-d compressive strength of polystyrene concrete ranges from 3.91Mpa to 6.18 Mpa which satisfies the strength requirement of light weight precast concrete panel. Light weight precast concrete panel made using Polystyrene are effectively used in partition walls, compound wall,parapet wall, w/c unit, road divider and other non- load bearing elements of the buildings as they provide required compressive strength. These elements shows good thermal insulations and durability. Light weight concrete can be made in any size and shape as per the requirement. KEYWORDS:-Light weight, Economy, waste minimize, Easy Handling and Installation, Eco-friendly, High Durability.