Sexuality, Race, and Integration of the Segregated in the Works of the Southern Renaissance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sexuality, Race, and Integration of the Segregated in the Works of the Southern Renaissance Title Passing into the Darkness : Sexuality, Race, and Integration of the Segregated in the Works of the Southern Renaissance Author(s) 松井, 美穂 Citation 北海道大学. 博士(文学) 甲第11178号 Issue Date 2014-03-25 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k11178 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/55346 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Miho_Matsui.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Passing into the Darkness: Sexuality, Race, and Integration of the Segregated in the Works of the Southern Renaissance by Miho Matsui CONTENTS Acknowledgements Introduction 1 Chapter I Sexualizing a Body, Passing as a Lady: Frances Newman’s The 20 Hard-Boiled Virgin and Julia Peterkin’s Scarlet Sister Mary 1. Katharine Faraday, a Black “White Southern Lady”: Frances Newman’s 24 The Hard-Boiled Virgin 2. Scarlet Mary, a White “Black Woman”: Julia Peterkin’s Scarlet Sister 46 Mary Chapter II Black Vision and Grotesque Whiteness: Reconsidering the Southern 64 Grotesque 1. Looking through the Grotesque: Short Stories of Julia Peterkin and 67 Eudora Welty 2. Who Is Tobe?: William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” 81 Chapter III The Sexuality, Masculinity, and Fragile Whiteness of Quentin 94 Compson in The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom! 1. The “Failed Champion of Dames”: Quentin in The Sound and the Fury 96 2. With “Garrulous Outraged Baffled Ghosts”: Quentin in Absalom, 109 Absalom! Chapter IV Crossing into Queer Whiteness: Carson McCullers’ Reflections in a 126 Golden Eye, The Member of the Wedding, and The Ballad of the Sad Café 1. Queering the Southern White Masculinity: Reflections in a Golden Eye 128 1.1 Captain Penderton: An Officer with a Delicate Masculine-Feminine 132 Balance 1.2 Anacleto: Grotesque Otherness that De/Constructs Difference 137 1.3 Alison/Anacleto: Subversive Assimilation 141 1.4 Golden Eyes: Penderton and Two Men as Racial Otherness 144 2. Taming of the Tomboy and Her Queer Resistance: The Member of the 151 Wedding 2.1 What Is Frankie Afraid of? 155 2.2 The Wedding: Normalizing a Tomboy 158 2.3 Fear of Sex, Fear of Marriage 162 2.4 Berenice with a Blue Glass Eye 167 2.5 End of Innocence and Awakening/Returning of Queer Desire 171 3. Queer Eyes: Cross-Gendering, Cross-Dressing, and Cross-Racing Miss 179 Amelia 3.1 Miss Amelia and the Gaze 184 3.2 Cross-Dressing Amelia / Cross-Dressing Narrator 191 3.3 Return of the Crossed/Queer Eyes 198 Conclusion: From Double Vision to Queer Vision 205 Notes 211 Works Cited 241 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to my advisor, Professor Eijun Senaha, for his patience, continuous guidance and helpful comments, which were necessary for the completion of my dissertation. He has been very supportive from the inception of the doctoral project, and with valuable advice, he has motivated me to continue my study. I would also like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Professors Yasuhiro Takeuchi and Hidemitsu Takahashi for their insightful comments and suggestions. I am thankful to the scholars and staff of Sapporo City University for their support and understanding. Above all, I am grateful to Professor Kayoko Machida who has always cheered me up with her warm words of encouragement. My sincere thanks go to the members of the Hokkaido American Literature Society. Stimulating and fruitful discussions with them were crucial to the completion of my thesis. I should mention Professor Sachiko Kamada, without whose friendship, support, and encouragement I would not be able to overcome difficulties to persevere with my study. I am also very grateful to Professor Emeritus of Hokkaido University, Atsushi Katayama, who led me to the study of American literature when I was an undergraduate student at Hokkaido University. Since then, he has provided me with tremendous support for my study. I would not have been an American literature scholar had I not met him. I wish to thank the former director of the Carson McCullers Center for Writers and Musicians, Professor Cathy Fussell. Cathy has been very helpful in giving me beneficial information and imparting knowledge about the American South. These interactions deepened my understanding of the South and provided me with inspiration for my study. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family. My parents and sister provided me with warm encouragement and were willing to give me whatever help I needed. I cannot express how grateful I am to my husband and two daughters because they allowed me to spend a great deal of time on my research and encouraged me to pursue and complete my thesis. Their smiles and words were always emotionally supportive, particularly when I experienced difficulty in my study. I hereby dedicate this thesis to my mother who has always been my model of a working mother. Her way of life has made me who I am, and I hope she is proud of my achievement. Introduction During the Southern Renaissance, from the 1920s to the 1950s, when the policy of racial segregation was nearly universal in the South, certain white southern writers crossed racial boundaries into blackness in their literary efforts (or in their imaginations) and produced works through “double vision,” a vision that includes both white and black viewpoints.1 This vision penetrates the seemingly ordered surface of southern society and sometimes leads to grotesque representations of the South. In other words, white female and male writers, by embracing the racial Other’s viewpoint and committing racial transgression or passing, reveal that the society constructed by whites is merely fictional. When looking through the Other’s eyes, white society itself is distorted. At the same time, these writers who call into question the notion of whiteness seek “alternative” gender, sexual, and racial subjectivities. As a recent racial identity study has shown, cultural discrimination between whiteness and blackness in American society is a social construction. White people project negative thoughts or “undesirable qualities” (Entzminger 78), such as primitiveness, savageness, and promiscuity, onto their racial Others. Thus, blackness is not a representation of what black people really are, but rather of “what white is not” (Sturken and Cartwright 104) or, in other words, “the projection of the not-me” (Morrison, Playing 38).2 This view of racial identity enables the argument that being born 1 white does not ensure whiteness. For example, John N. Duvall notes racial ambiguity of former President Bill Clinton described in Toni Morrison’s essay: Years ago, in the middle of the Whitewater investigation, one heard the first murmurs: white skin notwithstanding, this is our first black President. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost every trope of blackness—single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas. (Morrison, “The Talk of the Town” 32) Using Duvall’s words, “[a]s President, Clinton projected a white face to America while performing cultural blackness” (Race x). Meanwhile, Duvall also argues that William Faulkner is “America’s first Black Nobel Laureate” because of the “whiteface minstrel” performance in his work (Race x). Faulkner creates “racially inverted white characters” in the form of “individual[s] who appear white even as [they] perform cultural blackness” (“Black Sexuality” 133).3 As Duvall argues, “white skin is insufficient to make a white Southerner” (Race xv), and “Caucasians as well as Negroes can perform blackness” (“Black Sexuality”135). This approach to determining whiteness and blackness based on performance has expanded the range of racial identities to be considered. The key element of the argument regarding 2 whiteness/blackness is sexuality. Sexuality has long played a critical role in the construction of racial and class identities, especially in the South. Southern sexual ideology, according to Anne Goodwyn Jones, emerged historically as “a sort of unhappy marriage between Victorianism and slavery” (“‘Like a Virgin’” 56). In the South, sex, sexuality, and sexual desire are allocated according to the color line. The myth of southern womanhood defines white middle- and upper-class women as embodiments of purity, as opposed to black women (and also lower-class white women), who are presented as being inherently sexual: “Sexuality was natural, even desired by black women, and unnatural (thus never officially desired) for white women” (A. Jones, “Women Writers” 277).4 Southern belles are supposed to lack sexual desire, and their sexuality is normative only when it is used for producing “a legitimate family line that is pure white” (A. Jones, “Women Writers” 281). The white southern woman is a “perpetuator of white superiority in legitimate line” (Cash 87) and a bastion against miscegenation, the southern white’s greatest fear. Thus, discrimination between the “asexual” female body and the “sexual” one creates southern whiteness, and in this regard, “the southern lady is at the core of a region’s self-definition” (A. Jones, Tomorrow 4). 5 As Diane Roberts points out, in southern culture, white and black women are represented in terms of the dichotomy between “high and low, pure and polluted, bodies,” and [t]his opposition became part of the ideology of slavery 3 itself: the sexual availability of slave women (who could not without danger refuse the Master), their ability to perform hard physical labour, their exposed bodies, their dark skin itself served to make the lady in the big house more ladylike: more untouchable, more angelic, more white. (Aunt Jemima 4; italics original) In the South, “[s]exuality itself is represented . as something black” (Roberts, Aunt Jemima 175), and this notion of “sexuality as black” is used to control the bodies of both white women and black people.6 Therefore, if white women have sexual desires and have sex outside of marriage, they transgress not only ethical but also racial boundaries.
Recommended publications
  • 'They Made Gullah': Modernist Primitivists and The
    “ ‘They Made Gullah’: Modernist Primitivists and the Discovery and Creation of Sapelo Island, Georgia’s Gullah Community, 1915-1991” By Melissa L. Cooper A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Dr. Mia Bay and approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey January 2012 2012 Melissa L. Cooper ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “ ‘They Made Gullah’: Modernist Primitivists and the Discovery and Creation of Sapelo Island, Georgia’s Gullah Community, 1915-1991” by Melissa L. Cooper Dissertation Director: Dr. Mia Bay ABSTRACT: The history of Sapelo Islanders in published works reveals a complex cast of characters, each one working through ideas about racial distinction and inheritance; African culture and spirituality; and the legacy of slavery during the most turbulent years in America’s race-making history. Feuding social scientists, adventure seeking journalists, amateur folklorists, and other writers, initiated and shaped the perception of Sapelo Islanders’ distinct connection to Africa during the 1920s and 1930s, and labeled them “Gullah.” These researchers characterized the “Gullah,” as being uniquely connected to their African past, and as a population among whom African “survivals” were readily observable. This dissertation argues that the popular view of Sapelo Islanders’ “uniqueness” was the product of changing formulations about race and racial distinction in America. Consequently, the “discovery” of Sapelo Island’s Gullah folk was more a sign of times than an anthropological discovery. This dissertation interrogates the intellectual motives of the researchers and writers who have explored Sapelo Islanders in their works, and argues that the advent of American Modernism, the development of new social scientific theories and popular cultural works during the 1920s and 1930s, and other trends shaped their depictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize
    1946: no award given 1945: A Bell for Adano by John Hersey 1944: Journey in the Dark by Martin Flavin 1943: Dragon's Teeth by Upton Sinclair Pulitzer 1942: In This Our Life by Ellen Glasgow 1941: no award given 1940: The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck 1939: The Yearling by Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings Prize-Winning 1938: The Late George Apley by John Phillips Marquand 1937: Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell 1936: Honey in the Horn by Harold L. Davis Fiction 1935: Now in November by Josephine Winslow Johnson 1934: Lamb in His Bosom by Caroline Miller 1933: The Store by Thomas Sigismund Stribling 1932: The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck 1931 : Years of Grace by Margaret Ayer Barnes 1930: Laughing Boy by Oliver La Farge 1929: Scarlet Sister Mary by Julia Peterkin 1928: The Bridge of San Luis Rey by Thornton Wilder 1927: Early Autumn by Louis Bromfield 1926: Arrowsmith by Sinclair Lewis (declined prize) 1925: So Big! by Edna Ferber 1924: The Able McLaughlins by Margaret Wilson 1923: One of Ours by Willa Cather 1922: Alice Adams by Booth Tarkington 1921: The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton 1920: no award given 1919: The Magnificent Ambersons by Booth Tarkington 1918: His Family by Ernest Poole Deer Park Public Library 44 Lake Avenue Deer Park, NY 11729 (631) 586-3000 2012: no award given 1980: The Executioner's Song by Norman Mailer 2011: Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan 1979: The Stories of John Cheever by John Cheever 2010: Tinkers by Paul Harding 1978: Elbow Room by James Alan McPherson 2009: Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout 1977: No award given 2008: The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz 1976: Humboldt's Gift by Saul Bellow 2007: The Road by Cormac McCarthy 1975: The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara 2006: March by Geraldine Brooks 1974: No award given 2005: Gilead by Marilynne Robinson 1973: The Optimist's Daughter by Eudora Welty 2004: The Known World by Edward P.
    [Show full text]
  • P R O S P E C T
    PROSPECTUS CHRIS ABANI EDWARD ABBEY ABIGAIL ADAMS HENRY ADAMS JOHN ADAMS LÉONIE ADAMS JANE ADDAMS RENATA ADLER JAMES AGEE CONRAD AIKEN DANIEL ALARCÓN EDWARD ALBEE LOUISA MAY ALCOTT SHERMAN ALEXIE HORATIO ALGER JR. NELSON ALGREN ISABEL ALLENDE DOROTHY ALLISON JULIA ALVAREZ A.R. AMMONS RUDOLFO ANAYA SHERWOOD ANDERSON MAYA ANGELOU JOHN ASHBERY ISAAC ASIMOV JOHN JAMES AUDUBON JOSEPH AUSLANDER PAUL AUSTER MARY AUSTIN JAMES BALDWIN TONI CADE BAMBARA AMIRI BARAKA ANDREA BARRETT JOHN BARTH DONALD BARTHELME WILLIAM BARTRAM KATHARINE LEE BATES L. FRANK BAUM ANN BEATTIE HARRIET BEECHER STOWE SAUL BELLOW AMBROSE BIERCE ELIZABETH BISHOP HAROLD BLOOM JUDY BLUME LOUISE BOGAN JANE BOWLES PAUL BOWLES T. C. BOYLE RAY BRADBURY WILLIAM BRADFORD ANNE BRADSTREET NORMAN BRIDWELL JOSEPH BRODSKY LOUIS BROMFIELD GERALDINE BROOKS GWENDOLYN BROOKS CHARLES BROCKDEN BROWN DEE BROWN MARGARET WISE BROWN STERLING A. BROWN WILLIAM CULLEN BRYANT PEARL S. BUCK EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS WILLIAM S. BURROUGHS OCTAVIA BUTLER ROBERT OLEN BUTLER TRUMAN CAPOTE ERIC CARLE RACHEL CARSON RAYMOND CARVER JOHN CASEY ANA CASTILLO WILLA CATHER MICHAEL CHABON RAYMOND CHANDLER JOHN CHEEVER MARY CHESNUT CHARLES W. CHESNUTT KATE CHOPIN SANDRA CISNEROS BEVERLY CLEARY BILLY COLLINS INA COOLBRITH JAMES FENIMORE COOPER HART CRANE STEPHEN CRANE ROBERT CREELEY VÍCTOR HERNÁNDEZ CRUZ COUNTEE CULLEN E.E. CUMMINGS MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM RICHARD HENRY DANA JR. EDWIDGE DANTICAT REBECCA HARDING DAVIS HAROLD L. DAVIS SAMUEL R. DELANY DON DELILLO TOMIE DEPAOLA PETE DEXTER JUNOT DÍAZ PHILIP K. DICK JAMES DICKEY EMILY DICKINSON JOAN DIDION ANNIE DILLARD W.S. DI PIERO E.L. DOCTOROW IVAN DOIG H.D. (HILDA DOOLITTLE) JOHN DOS PASSOS FREDERICK DOUGLASSOur THEODORE Mission DREISER ALLEN DRURY W.E.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex, Seduction and Sedition in Restoration Literature
    2016 – 2017 ENGLISH LITERATURE THIRD YEAR OPTION COURSES 25 November 2016 English Literature - Third Year Option courses SEMESTER ONE Page American Innocence p. 3 Brecht and British Theatre (NOT RUNNING THIS SESSION) p. 6 Celtic Revivals (NOT RUNNING THIS SESSION) p. 8 Cities of Words p. 10 Creative Writing: Prose * p. 12 Edinburgh in Fiction/Fiction in Edinburgh * [Visiting Students course] p. 16 Fiction and the Gothic p. 18 Ideology and Literature (NOT RUNNING THIS SESSION) p. 20 Medicine in Literature 1: Illness Narratives through History p. 22 Modernism and Empire p. 24 Modernism and the Market (NOT NOW RUNNING THIS SESSION) p. 26 Modern Scottish Fiction * p. 28 Novel and the Collapse of Humanism p. 30 The Body in Literature p. 31 The Making of Modern Fantasy (NOT RUNNING THIS SESSION) p. 34 Utopia: Imaginary Journeys from More to Orwell p. 37 Working Class Representations * p. 39 SEMESTER TWO Page American Gothic p. 42 Creative Writing: Poetry * p. 45 Edinburgh in Fiction/Fiction in Edinburgh * p. 48 Medicine in Literature 2: Medical Ethics in Literature * p. 50 Modern and Contemporary Scottish Poetry * p. 52 Mystery and Horror * p. 55 Poetry and Northern Ireland p. 57 Shakespeare’s Comedies: Identity and Illusion p. 60 Shakespeare: Modes and Genres p. 62 ‘We Are [not] Amused’: Victorian Comic Literature p. 64 Writing for Theatre: An Introduction* p. 66 * Courses with an asterisk have a Scottish emphasis. Note: Courses may be taught by staff in addition to the named course organiser. 2 English Literature - Third Year Option courses English Literature Third Year Semester One Option Course American Innocence Course Organiser: Dr Ken Millard The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Literature Association Alfred Bendixen, 2014 Conference Director
    American Literature Association A Coalition of Societies Devoted to the Study of American Authors 25th Annual Conference on American Literature May 22-25, 2014 Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill Washington, D.C. (202-737-1234) Conference Director Alfred Bendixen Texas A&M University Draft as of March 5, 2014 This on-line draft of the program is designed to provide information to participants in our 25th conference and provide them with an opportunity to make corrections. Participants should check the description of their papers and panels to ensure that names and titles and other information are spelled appropriately. Times of Panels: If there is a conflict in the program (i.e., someone is booked to appear in two places at the same time), please let me know immediately. The program indicates that a few slots for business meetings are still available, but it will be difficult to make other changes. You can presume that the day of your panel is now fixed in stone (and it will not change without the concurrence of every person on that panel) but it may be necessary to make minor changes in the time of a panel. Audio-Visual Equipment: The program also lists the audio-visual equipment that has been requested for each panel. Please note that it may be difficult or impossible to add any audio-visual equipment at this point, but individuals may make such requests. The ALA normally provides a digital projector and screen to those who have requested it at the time the panel or paper is submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Willa Cather's Modern Sentimentalism
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Modern Sentimentalism: Feeling, Femininity, and Female Authorship in Interwar America A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in English by Lisa Anne Mendelman 2015 © Copyright by Lisa Anne Mendelman 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Modern Sentimentalism: Feeling, Femininity, and Female Authorship in Interwar America by Lisa Anne Mendelman Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Michael A. North, Chair “Modern Sentimentalism” chronicles the myriad ways in which sentimentalism evolves as modernism emerges. I demonstrate that sentimental aesthetics are more complex than we have thought and that these aesthetics participate in modern literary innovation. I likewise demonstrate that modernity, and the American interwar period in particular, enjoys a more complex relation to the sentimental than we have understood, and that twentieth-century constructs of gender and emotion equally revise and restyle sentimental precedent. Finally, I demonstrate that, when it comes to analyzing historical cultures of feeling, contemporary theories of affect have much to gain from archival methods. Synthesizing these claims, I identify a new form of feeling in modern aesthetic experience. Neither an idealized lapse into the past nor a naïve vision of the future, what I call “modern sentimentalism” most often registers the ironic consciousness of an enduring sentimental impulse. ii “Modern Sentimentalism” thus overturns
    [Show full text]
  • Carson Mccullers
    Carson McCullers: An Inventory of Her Collection at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center Descriptive Summary Creator McCullers, Carson, 1917-1967 Title Carson McCullers Collection Dates: 1924-1976 Extent 48 boxes (20 linear feet), 16 galley folders, 3 oversize flat files Abstract: The manuscripts and correspondence which make up the bulk of the McCullers collection principally reflect her literary life and career. RLIN Record # TXRC98-A16 Language English. Access Open for research Administrative Information Acquisition Purchases and gifts, 1967-1993 (R3856, 4289, 4591, 4498, 4957, 6041, 6604, 6605, 13058, G9650) Processed by Sally M. Nichols, 1998 Repository: Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center University of Texas at Austin McCullers, Carson, 1917-1967 Biographical Sketch Carson McCullers was born in Columbus, Georgia, as Lula Carson Smith on February 19, 1917, the first born of Lamar and Marguerite Waters Smith. Though she moved from the South in 1934 and only returned for visits, most of her writing was inspired by her southern heritage. Her mother felt she had given birth to a genius from the time Carson was very young and always remained her staunchest supporter and strongest ally. When nine years of age, Lula began studying piano and practiced six to eight hours daily, planning a career as a concert pianist. In 1930 she began using the name Carson and studying piano with Mary Tucker. Carson graduated from Columbus High School in 1933, and after her piano teacher moved away in the spring of 1934, Carson moved to New York City to study at the Juilliard School of Music. Shortly after her arrival she lost most of the money her parents had given her, and to support herself worked at various jobs and attended night classes in creative writing at Columbia and New York University.
    [Show full text]
  • Carologue Index Updated August 2016
    Month/Seaso Year Page(s) Title Author Subjects Illustrations Comments/Other n The contributions and accomplishments of Gene 1985 Jan-Feb 1 Gene Waddell Joins Getty David Molke-Hansen Photo of Gene Waddell Waddell as he leaves the SCHS Description of source 1985 Jan-Feb 2-3 Palmetto Genealogy Isabella G. Leland materials at the SCHS for genealogical research David Moltke-Hansen Is New Bio of David Moltke-Hansen, 1985 Jan-Feb 4 Susan Walker Photo of David Moltke-Hansen Director new SCHS director Description and historical Photo of the Flag of the 1985 Jan-Feb 5, 11 Moultrie Guard Flag Evokes Past Margaretta Childs significance of the Moultrie Moultrie Guard, p.5 Guard Flag Description of homes to be toured during the 1985 Photo of the Bishop Smith 1985 Jan-Feb 7 1985 Annual Meeting Tour annual meeting, ten House in Charleston properties owned by the College of Charleston The story of Santee planter, William P. Baldwin, John Bowman and Photo of John Bowman's mill 1985 Jan-Feb 8-10 Mr. Bowman's Windmill Jr. especially his connection to shaft, p.9 Jonathan Lucas, millwright Description of material Photo of bust of Julia Peterkin 1985 Jan-Feb 12 Peterkin Papers donated to the SCHS by Dr. P.I.E. Weston relating to Julia Peterkin 1832 letter of proposal from 1985 Jan-Feb 13-14 T. Bynum's "Affaire du Coeur" Donna Roper Turner Bynum, Jr. to Caroline Virginia Taliaferro Some of the upcoming College of Charleston events in celebrating the 1985 Jan-Feb 14 Bicentennial 200th anniversary of the College of Charleston Information on post cards Elizabeth Verner Postcards Post card by Artvue Post Card 1985 May-June 1 Joseph T.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF 650.02 KB
    Rea, The Medieval Slut Page 1 of 163 The Medieval Slut Sexual Identities of Medieval Women in the Patriarchal Narratives of the Decameron and Canterbury Tales Rosalynd Rea Advised by Professor Cord J. Whitaker of the English Department Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Prerequisite for Honors in Medieval & Renaissance Studies May 2019 Rea, The Medieval Slut Page 2 of 163 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter One: The Introductory Slut............................................................................................................... 5 Chapter Two: The Courtly Slut ..................................................................................................................... 25 Chapter Three: The Adulterous Slut ............................................................................................................. 69 Chapter Four: The Professional Slut .......................................................................................................... 106 Chapter Five: The Conclusory Slut or The Modern Medieval Slut ....................................................... 140 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................................... 159 Rea, The Medieval Slut Page 3 of 163 Acknowledgements I would like to start by thanking Professor Cord Whitaker, without whom
    [Show full text]
  • Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain?: Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension (With P
    Chicago-Kent College of Law Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship January 2012 Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain?: Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension (with P. Heald) Christopher J. Buccafusco IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol Part of the Evidence Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher J. Buccafusco, Do Bad Things Happen When Works Enter the Public Domain?: Empirical Tests of Copyright Term Extension (with P. Heald), 28 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/fac_schol/148 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DO BAD THINGS HAPPEN WHEN WORKS ENTER THE PUBLIC DOMAIN?: EMPIRICAL TESTS OF COPYRIGHT TERM EXTENSION Christopher Buccafusco. & Paul J. Heald ABSTRACT According to the current copyright statute, in 2018, copyrighted works of music, film, and literature will begin to transition into the public domain. While this will prove a boon for users and creators, it could be disastrous for the owners of these valuable copyrights. Accordingly, the next few years will witness another round of aggressive lobbying by the film, music, and publishing industries to extend the terms of already-existing works.
    [Show full text]
  • FORUM: a PUBLICATION of the ALSCW Literary Study in Grades 9
    FORUM 4 • Literary Study in Grades 9, 10, and 11: A National Survey 1 FORUM: A PUBLICATION OF THE ALSCW Number 4 • Fall 2010 Literary Study in Grades 9, 10, and 11: A National Survey Sandra Stotsky with Joan Traffas and James Woodworth a Kate Oser, managing editor Katherine Hala, graphic designer Copyright 2010, all rights reserved by the Association of Literary Scholars, Critics, and Writers a Association of Literary Scholars, Critics, and Writers a 2 FORUM 4 • Literary Study in Grades 9, 10, and 11: A National Survey ACKNOWLEDGMENT Like so many research projects, this one started with a discussion. At a meeting of the Association of Literary Scholars, Critics, and Writers, several members asked: “What are high school students being asked to read today?” My response was this research project—a survey of over 400 English teachers in grades 9, 10, and 11 in public schools across the country to find out what they assign and how they approach literary study. I am grateful to the National Endowment for the Humanities for a grant to support the survey, and to the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation for a grant to cover the costs of publication and dissemination. I was fortunate in being able to draw on the research budget attached to my 21st Century Chair in Teacher Quality in the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas and in having the University’s support for my time as Principal Investigator. I thank Kim Gillow and Molly Longstreth at the University’s Survey Research Center for assembling a representative national sample of English teachers in grades 9, 10, and 11 and for Kim’s hours in synthesizing the information gathered by the interviewers and in answering my questions about numbers and their interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Inherited Memory: a Comparison of How World War II
    Inherited Memory A Qualitative Study of How World War II Influences the Japanese Postwar Generation Submitted in fulfillment of the final project requirement for the Diploma of Process Work from the Process Work Center of Portland Graduate School by Ayako Fujisaki, M.A. November, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS AKNOW LEDGEMENTS ……………..…………………………………………………………….. i ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………… iii I INTRO DUCTIO N………………………………..………………………………………………1 Research Purpose ………………………………………………......…………………… 5 Method ……………………………………………………………..……………………… 8 Introduction to Process W ork …………………………………………………………... 9 W orldwork ………………………………………………………...………………….. 10 Deep Dem ocracy……………………………………………...…………………… 11 Fields ………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 Role/Tim espirits ……………………………………………………………………… 12 G hosts ………………………………………………………………………...………. 13 Hot Spots …………………………………………………………………………….. 14 Overview of This Thesis ………………………………………………………………… 14 II METHODOLOGY ……………………………………………………………………………. 19 Methodology ……………………………………………………...…………………….. 19 Focus G roups ………………………………………………………………………... 21 Evaluation of This Study ……………………………………………………………. 24 Placem ent of Literature Review …………………………………………………. 26 Current Study …………………………………………………………………………….. 27 Participants ………………………………………………………………………….. 27 Q uestions …………………………………………………………………………….. 29 Analysis ………………………………………………………………………….……. 30 Ethical Considerations ……………………………………………………..………. 31 Issue of Translation ……………………………………………………………..…… 33 Sum m ary ……………………………………………………………………………..…… 34 III SUBJECTIVITY OF THE RESEACHER
    [Show full text]