DOCSLIB.ORG

Tennessee Nawca Projects $13,724,048 $66,474,406 35 68,251 Nawca Grant Amount Total Partner Contribution Number of Projects Total Acres

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tennessee Nawca Projects $13,724,048 $66,474,406 35 68,251 Nawca Grant Amount Total Partner Contribution Number of Projects Total Acres TENNESSEE NAWCA PROJECTS $13,724,048 $66,474,406 35 68,251 NAWCA GRANT AMOUNT TOTAL PARTNER CONTRIBUTION NUMBER OF PROJECTS TOTAL ACRES Tennessee currently has 35 NAWCA projects either completed or underway. These projects have conserved a total of 68,251acres of wildlife habitat. NAWCA funding of more than $13.7 million stimulated partner contributions of over $66.4 million. These figures do not include multi-state projects. WEST TENNESSEE WETLANDS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT In western Tennessee, six public and private partners have developed a landscape approach to conserve wetlands and adjacent uplands in the Lower Missisippi Alluvial Valley and the East Gulf Coastal Plain. The project will protect 866 acres, restore 951 acres, and enhance 624 acres on 14 tracts across several state wildlife management areas. This will begin to compensate for the loss of seasonally flooded wetlands due to agriculture and development in forested wetlands. It will enhance water quality, and reduce flooding and runoff, benefiting 20 priority species of migratory birds. PROJECT NAME GRANT PARTNER TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT CONTRIBUTION INVESTMENT ACRES 1. **BUSSELTOWN WETLAND $75,000 $365,380 $440,380 185 ENHANCEMENT 2. **CEDAR HILL SWAMP - $75,000 $220,000 $295,000 95 RICCHUITE TRACT ACQUISITION 3. **WOLF RIVER WMA - $75,000 $138,075 $213,075 97 SIMINGTON TRACT ACQUISITION 4. FORKED DEER RIVER - MILLER $75,000 $134,500 $209,500 124 TRACT ACQUISITION 5. LOWER OBION RIVER VI - $1,000,000 $3,369,000 $4,369,000 2,816 TUMBLEWEED ACQUISITION 6. WEST TENNESSEE WETLANDS $999,900 $2,263,507 $3,263,407 2,441 ENHANCEMENT PROJECT 7. CANNON TRACT ACQUISITION $75,000 $229,200 $304,200 279 8. BARK CAMP BARRENS, TN $75,000 $367,500 $442,500 200 9. SOUTH FORK, FORKED DEER $75,000 $112,500 $187,500 618 RIVER, TN 10. Mingo Swamp - Cole Tract $75,000 $125,000 $200,000 84 Acquisition 11. UPPER WOLF RIVER - SPINOLO $75,000 $170,850 $245,850 154 TRACT ACQUISITION 12. LOWER OBION RIVER, PHASE V $1,000,000 $3,227,433 $4,227,433 1,017 13. WETLAND ENHANCEMENT AT $15,000 $35,000 $50,000 322 OLD HICKORY WMA 14. KILLEBREW TRACT ACQUISITION $75,000 $494,364 $569,364 253 - SHELTON FERRY WETLANDS 15. BIG SWAN HEADWATERS $25,000 $25,415 $50,415 38 PRESERVE: BOILING SPRINGS TRACT ACQUISITION 16. RESTORATION OF LICK CREEK $75,000 $937,415 $1,012,415 549 WETLANDS - JOACHIM BIBLE REFUGE TRACTS 17. WOLF RIVER, TENNESSEE, PHASE $1,000,000 $12,011,076 $13,011,076 2,729 II 18. LOWER OBION RIVER III $1,000,000 $3,406,863 $4,406,863 2,382 19. WEST TENNESSEE MIGRATORY $50,000 $2,496,500 $2,546,500 2,369 BIRD CONSERVATION AREA 20. LOWER OBION RIVER II $1,000,000 $2,916,109 $3,916,109 2,772 21. MID - MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL $1,000,000 $3,035,740 $4,035,740 4,163 VALLEY II 22. MISSISSIPPI RIVER HABITAT $50,000 $166,000 $216,000 1,138 PROTECTION PROJECT 23. UPPER TENNESSEE RIVER I $1,000,000 $3,479,088 $4,479,088 2,862 24. LOWER OBION RIVER I $1,000,000 $4,686,994 $5,686,994 6,561 25. MID - MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL $1,000,000 $5,319,651 $6,319,651 14,033 VALLEY BIRD CONSERVATION AREA I 26. WEST TENNESSEE MIGRATORY $50,000 $1,760,122 $1,810,122 1,638 BIRD CONSERVATION AREA 27. SMITH BEND CAMPAIGN $50,000 $6,880,000 $6,930,000 2,500 28. BIG SWAN CREEK HEADWATER $26,500 $97,900 $124,400 315 PROTECTION STAR BRANCH ACQUISITION 29. WOLF RIVER $732,700 $3,335,300 $4,068,000 4,467 30. COLD CREEK FULLEN TRACT $300,000 $639,760 $939,760 830 31. MUSTIN BOTTOMS I $882,100 $1,775,600 $2,657,700 2,981 32. MUSTIN BOTTOMS II $360,000 $489,500 $849,500 2,387 33. WHITE LAKE II $173,125 $451,804 $624,929 1,483 34. HORNS BLUFF $56,223 $385,860 $442,083 1,431 35. WHITE LAKE $128,500 $925,400 $1,053,900 1,938 TOTAL: $13,724,048 $66,474,406 $80,198,454 68,251 **Indicates project funded in 2016 TENNESSEE MULTI-STATE PROJECTS $3,549,838 $7,855,887 5 99,855 NAWCA GRANT AMOUNT TOTAL PARTNER CONTRIBUTION NUMBER OF PROJECTS TOTAL ACRES Tennessee currently has 5 NAWCA multi-state projects either completed or underway. These projects have conserved a total of 99,855 acres of wildlife habitat. NAWCA funding of more than $3.5 million stimulated partner contributions of over $7.8 million. PROJECT NAME GRANT PARTNER TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT CONTRIBUTION INVESTMENT ACRES 1. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF $100,000 $151,255 $251,255 1,250 PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE - DEMO PROJ 2. MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL $1,131,185 $1,841,314 $2,972,499 11,876 VALLEY 3. LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY $955,898 $2,288,736 $3,244,634 33,187 ECOSYSTEM 4. LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY $999,655 $2,295,999 $3,295,654 31,292 ECOSYSTEM II 5. WETLANDS RESTORATION $363,100 $1,278,583 $1,641,683 22,250 PRIVATE LANDS LMV 1994 TOTAL: $3,549,838 $7,855,887 $11,405,725 99,855 For additional information please contact Ducks Unlimited, Inc.’s Governmental Affairs Office at 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite 745, Washington, D.C., 20001 or call (202) 347-1530 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Channel Evolution in Modified Alluvial Streams
    16 TRANSPOIU'AT/ON RESEARCH RECORD 1151 Channel Evolution in Modified Alluvial Streams ANDREW SIMON AND CLIFF R. HUPP Modification of alluvial channels ln western Tennessee bas (dso), or both, such that rapid and observable morphologic created Increased energy conditions along main stems and changes occur. tributaries and Initiated longitudinal c11annel adjustment Channelization (dredging and straightening) is a common Changes In bed level are functions of the magnitude a.nd extent engineering practice for controlJing flooding or draining wet­ of the Imposed disturbance and the location of the adjusting reach In the 6uvlal network. Streambed degradation ls de­ lands. Quantification of subsequent channel responses can be scribed by simple power equations. Computed exponents ae­ '!!!l'.!:!b!e L'1 estinrnting ili"' P.ffPr.t!! on river-crossing structures fine the magnitude of downcuttlng wl1b time and decrease and Jands adjacent to these channels. The purposes of this study nonlinearly with distance upstream from the area ofmaxJmum arc (a) to assess the channel changes and network trend of bed disturbance (AMD). Aggradatlon begins Immediately In level response after modifications between 1959 and 1972 of reaches downstream or the AM.D and In upstream reaches alluvial channels in western Tennessee (Figure I) and (b) to after overadjustment by tl1e degradation process. Aggradatlon develop a conceptual model of bank slope development to rates Increase linearly with distance downstream from the AMD and can be estimated rrom local degradation rates. qualitatively assess bank stability and potential channel widen­ CJrnnnel widening hy ma.'is wasting follows degradation and ing. Such a model will be useful in identifyii1g trends of continues through nggradatlonaJ phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Great River Road Tennessee
    Great River Road Tennessee Corridor Management Plan Corridor Management Plan Recognitions Mayor AC Wharton Shelby County Byway Consultant Mayor Jeff Huffman Tipton County David L. Dahlquist Mayor Rod Schuh Lauderdale County Governor Phil Bredesen President Mayor Richard Hill Dyer County State of Tennessee David L. Dahlquist Associates, L.L.C. Mayor Macie Roberson Lake County State Capitol 5204 Shriver Avenue Mayor Benny McGuire Obion County Nashville, TN 37243 Des Moines, IA 50312 Commissioner Susan Whitaker Pickering Firm, Inc Department of Tourist Development Byway Planning Team Architecture – Engineering – Planning – Surveying Wm. Snodgrass/Tennessee Tower 312 8th Avenue North, 25th Floor Bob Pitts, PE Nashville, TN 37243 Mississippi River Corridor – Tennessee, Inc. Principal Owner Board of Directors Director, Civil Engineering Services Ms. Marty Marbry 6775 Lenox Center Court – Suite 300 West Tennessee – Tourist Development Memphis, TN 38115 Regional Marketing & Public Relations John Sheahan Chairman/CEO John Threadgill Secretary Historical Consultant Commissioner Gerald Nicely Dr. Carroll Van West Tennessee Department of Transportation Jim Bondurant Chair – Obion - Task Force Committe Director 505 Deaderick St. Rosemary Bridges Chair – Tipton - Task Force Committee Center for Historic Preservation James K. Polk Bldg. – 7th Floor Peter Brown Chair – Dyer - Task Force Committee Middle Tennessee State University Nashville, TN 37243 Laura Holder Tennessee Civil War National Heritage Area P.O. Box 80 – MTSU Pamela Marshall Public Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigations in the Obion River Drainage: the West
    .~~- -~.- .~---~~~~~~~- ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE OBION RIVER DRAINAGE: THE WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES PROJECT by Robert C. Mainfort, Jr. with contributions by Jamie C. Brandon Emanuel Breitburg Shawn Chapman Mary L. Kwas William L. Lawrence June E. Mirecki Andrea B. Shea Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology, Research Series No. 10 1994 . ~4~\·JRobert C. Mainfort, . Principal Investigator ii Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Archaeology, Research Series No. 10 Copyright © 1994 - Tennessee Division of Archaeology TENNESSEE DEPARTrvIENT OF ENVIRONrvIENT AND CONSERVATION, DIVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGY, RESEARCH SERIES publications are isssued at irregular intervals. Individual volumes are produced by staff members and other qualified individuals in order to promote the exchange of scholarly information concerning the history and prehistory of the State of Tennessee. Copies of all publications in the series may be obtained from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, 401 Church Street, 13th Floor, Nashville, Tennessee 37243, (615)532-1516. Pursuant to the State of Tennessee's policy of non-discrimination, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation does not discriminate on the basis of race sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, or military service in its policies, or in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, -services or activities. Equal Employment Opportunityl Affirmative Action!ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, EEOlAAIADA Coordinator, 401 Church Street, 21st Floor, Nashville, TN 37243, (615)532-0103. Hearing impaired callers may use the Tennessee Relay Service (1-800-848-0298). Tennessee Department of Environment and Con­ servation, Authorization No.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to TN Watersheds
    What Is a Watershed? A watershed is all the land area that drains into a given body of water. Small watersheds combine to become big watersheds, sometimes called basins. When water from a few acres drains into a little stream, those few acres are its watershed. When that stream flows into a larger stream, and that larger stream flows into a bigger river, then the initial small watershed is now part of that river’s watershed. Watersheds are a logical way to think about the connection between the land and the quality of water we enjoy. How we manage and treat the land has a direct impact on the ability of water to support a number of im- portant public uses like swimming, fishing, aquatic species habitat and drinking water supply. We all live downstream from someone, and what happens in a watershed does not just stay in that watershed. Managing Programs by Watershed Tennessee’s water-protection program focuses on watersheds because it’s the Advisory Groups best way to evaluate, protect and improve the quality of all the waters in the state. Watershedof Arkansas Diagram WatershedCourtesy When pollutants threaten or prevent our waters from meeting clean-water goals, we can look at all of the pollution sources in the affected watershed and develop Water from rainfall that doesn’t evaporate runs more comprehensive control strategies. into ditches, streams, creeks, rivers, wetlands Tennessee recognizes 55 watersheds, and TDEC has developed a watershed or lakes. A watershed is the land area from management plan for each of them. Visit www.tn.gov/environment/watersheds which water drains into a river, stream or lake.
    [Show full text]
  • 502642 Tulane Zoology & Botany Book.Indd
    A NEW DARTER OF SUBGENUS OLIGOCEPHALUS, GENUS ETHEOSTOMA, FROM SOUTHEASTERN TEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN LOUISIANA ROYAL D. SUTTKUS Tulane University Biodiversity Research Institute, Belle Chasse, LA 70037-3098 HENRY L. BART, JR. Tulane University Biodiversity Research Institute, Belle Chasse, LA 70037-3098 AND DAVID A. ETNIER University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 ABSTRACT A new species of darter of subgenus Oligocephalus, genus Etheostoma, is herein de- scribed relative to three similar and geographically proximal Oligocephalus – E. aspri- gene (Forbes), E. collettei Birdsong & Knapp, and E. swaini (Jordan) – largely con- fined to the Gulf Coastal Plain and the Central Lowlands of the eastern United States. The new species occurs in the Neches, Sabine and Calcasieu river systems of east Tex- as and western Louisiana. It is most closely related to E. asprigene. It differs from all of the above species primarily in having a longer spinous dorsal fin base and a narrow- er transpelvic width. Nuptial males of the new species differ in breeding coloration and have significantly shorter snouts and caudal peduncles, and narrower bodies than nuptial males of E. asprigene and other Oligocephalus compared. The new species is most similar to E. aprigene in physiognomy and body pigmentation. Keywords: New species, Etheostoma asprigene, Oligocephalus, Neches River, Sabine River, Calcasieu River INTRODUCTION In this paper we describe a new species of darter of subgenus Oligocephalus, genus Etheostoma, and diagnose it relative to three similar and geographically proxi- mal Oligocephalus–E. asprigene (Forbes), E. collettei Birdsong & Knapp, and E. swaini (Jordan). We compare meristic and morphometric data of the new species with that of E.
    [Show full text]
  • False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? the Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond
    River Management Society Supporting Professionals Who Study, Protect, and Manage RMS SPRING 2017 VOLUME 30, NO. 1 North America’s Rivers Southeast Focus RMS Pro-Purchase News..................... 4 Virginia’s Scenic Rivers ........................ 6 Restoring the Mulberry River ................ 8 Tennessee Wildlife Federation Gift ....... 9 The Obion Basin Fight ........................ 10 Family Fun on the Pascagoula ........... 13 Tennessee River Basin Network......... 14 Conservation Easements - A Tool ....... 15 Bama’s Bone Dry ................................ 16 Wonks, Water, Walls, and... .............. 18 Georgia Water Trails ........................... 21 San Antonio River Authority ................ 24 RMS Chapter Updates ....................... 27 Innovative Tennessee River Project ... 28 Google Earth aerial image of the Franklin sewer plant and Harpeth River. False Dichotomy Between Growth and Clean Water? The Harpeth River Experience with Citizen Suits and Beyond by James M. Redwine The State Scenic Harpeth River, Greater Founded in 1999, the Harpeth River So often, the choice is portrayed to be Nashville, and the Harpeth River Watershed Association is a 501(c)(3) between clean water and growth, with Watershed Association not-for-profit, science-based conservation clean water inevitably the loser. The organization dedicated to protecting the Harpeth River Watershed Association The Harpeth River is among the State Scenic Harpeth River and clean (HRWA) does not believe that this always unique freshwater river systems of the water in Tennessee. To protect the river has to be the case. Rather, HRWA’s recent Southeast. These systems contain some and effect change, HRWA collaborates experience with a citizen suit under the of the greatest variety of aquatic life with landowners, businesses, community, federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (and its in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Obion River Watershed (08010203) of the Mississippi River Basin
    SOUTH FORK OBION RIVER WATERSHED (08010203) OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION SOUTH FORK OBION RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Summary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the South Fork Obion River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the South Fork Obion River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the South Fork Obion River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the South Fork Obion River Watershed Chapter 6. Restoration Strategies Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroperiod •West Tennessee Geography
    10/17/2011 DEGRADATION OF WEST TENNESSEE RIVERS AND FLOODPLAINS: A FASCINATING STORY OF BIOLOGY, GEOLOGY, AND POLITICS Sonja N. Oswalt S Outline EDIMENTATION •Brief overview of Basic River Geomorphology and Floodplain Dynamics • Hydrology; Hydroperiod •West Tennessee geography •The Issues and their Impacts on West Tennessee floodplains: • West Tennessee landuse IN • West Tennessee Soils W • Sedimentation EST • Normal versus Excessive T ENNESSEE • Channelization • Levees • Beavers and other natural processes • People •Restoration of a river system: what would it take? •Current status •Beyond West Tennessee--A Landscape Perspective •Recommended Reading (about W. Tennessee and other Fabulous wetland and river-related books that I highly recommend!) Factors Impacting Floodplain Vegetation Floodplain Geomorphology (study of the origin and evolution of floodplain landform) • Main channel meanders • Point bars, cut banks • Natural levee • Oxbow lake • Meander scars • Backswamps • Ridges and swales • Flats 1 10/17/2011 Factors Impacting Floodplain Vegetation Floodplain Hydrology (study of the occurrence, movement, distribution, and properties of water in the river and surrounding floodplain) • Hydroperiod: • Frequency (how often flooding occurs) • Duration (how long floodwater sticks around) • Water Depth • Flow Pattern Geomorphology + Hydrology = Hydrogeomorpology Factors Impacting Floodplain Vegetation Sedimentation in Floodplain Systems • Nutrient source for floodplain soils • Builds floodplain topography • Improves water quality as sediments
    [Show full text]
  • Obion County Opportunity Zone Investment Prospectus
    Obion County Opportunity Zone Investment Prospectus The use of the word “prospectus” for the purpose of the work contained herein is not to advertise about, endorse or in any other way to promote or offer specific investment opportunities. The rural investment prospectus is a template designed to help unify local leaders around a plan, to show what might occur in a region and to use as a tool to promote the region and its plans. The prospectus has been prepared for discussion purposes only and not Disclaimer to induce anyone to enter into any agreement or transaction. For the avoidance of any doubt, the distribution of this prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any assets or equity securities or any investment of any kind. The Rural & Regional Investment Prospectus: Purpose Help Obion County Help Obion County Help Obion County market its organize its assets organize opportunity zone to to have maximum stakeholders around local, regional, and economic and social the unified vision of national investors impact. inclusive growth. Audience for this Prospectus Local individuals with capital gains Opportunity Fund Managers Philanthropies and individuals with an Obion County interest Market Context Narrative of Obion County, Tennessee Home of the famous Discovery Park of America, it is only fitting that there are many things to discover in Obion County, Tennessee. Hunting, fishing, and outdoor recreation opportunities are endless at Reelfoot Lake State Park. Quality post- secondary education is available at regional institutions including the University of Tennessee at Martin, Dyersburg State Community College, and Bethel University.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Sedimentation and Surface-Water Flow Patterns on the Flood Plain of the North Fork Forked Deer River, Dyer County, Tennessee
    Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4082 RECENT SEDIMENTATION AND SURFACE-WATER FLOW PATTERNS ON THE FLOOD PLAIN OF THE NORTH FORK FORKED DEER RIVER, DYER COUNTY, TENNESSEE Prepared by the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY in cooperation with the TENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES AGENCY Cover photograph. South side outlet of Tigrett Wildlife Manage- ment Area, Dyer County, Tennessee. Note roots of old cypress stump and roots of small tree on top of stump. Photograph by Bradley A. Bryan, U.S. Geological Survey. RECENT SEDIMENTATION AND SURFACE-WATER FLOW PATTERNS ON THE FLOOD PLAIN OF THE NORTH FORK FORKED DEER RIVER, DYER COUNTY, TENNESSEE By William J. Wolfe and Timothy H. Diehl U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4082 Prepared in cooperation with the TENNESSEE WILDLIFE RESOURCES AGENCY Nashville, Tennessee 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director The use of firm and trade names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief US. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 810 Broadway, Suite 500 Federal Center, Box 25425 Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Denver, Colorado 80225 Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 2 Previous studies 2 Acknowledgments 4 Study area 4 Flood-plain stratigraphy and recent sedimentation rates 5 Flood-plain materials 5 Recent sedimentation rates 8 Surface-water flow patterns 10 Location and condition of the natural channel 10 Primary flow path--the North Fork Forked Deer ditch 13 Present location of flood-plain flow paths 13 Flow paths between Doakville Creek and Parker Ditch 13 Flow paths between Stokes Creek and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • West Tennessee River Degradation Photominimized Oswalt.Pptx
    11/9/14 Forest Resources of the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley 1882 Mississippi River “Improvement” 1927 flood 1927 flood 1973 flood 2011 flood 1 11/9/14 Mississippi (Coahoma Cty), May 1932 Survey Louisiana 1951 Survey Forest Area reported in 1986 1930: 11.8 miLLion acres 1980: 6.6 miLLion acres 2 11/9/14 Forest Area StasNcs Total Area – 26.7 miLLion acres (Defined by 1986 PubLicaon) Forest Area – 7.6 miLLion acres Percent Forested - 28 3 11/9/14 Range: < 3 percent to 70 percent forested Forest types within the broad “BLH” umbreLLa Oak/Gum/Cypress Sweetgum/Nuttall oak/willow oak 1,267.4 Baldcypress/water tupelo 863.5 Overcup oak/water hickory 571.4 Swamp chestnut oak/cherrybark oak 181.3 Sweetbay/swamp tupelo/red maple 179.0 Baldcypress/pondcypress 0.2 Elm/Ash/Cottonwood Sugarberry/hackberry/elm/green ash 1,286.8 Sycamore/pecan/American elm 415.5 Willow 226.6 River birch/sycamore 102.9 Cottonwood 55.5 Cottonwood/willow 50.7 Red maple/lowland 43.4 Forest Type Groups Other eastern softwoods 0% Oak-hickory 17% Oak-gum- cypress Oak-pine 41% 2% Loblolly-shortleaf 7% Nonstocked 3% Exotic hardwoods 1% Other hardwoods Elm-ash- 0% cottonwood 29% Figure 3—Proportion of forest area by forest-type group. Bottomland hardwood area as defined in this publication consists of the oak-gum-cypress and elm-ash-cottonwood forest-type groups, combined. 4 11/9/14 Forest Type Groups and Stand Size 2500 Small diameter 2000 Medium diameter Large diameter 1500 1000 500 Area (thousand acres) 0 Oak-pine Oak-hickory Loblolly-shortleaf Oak-gum-cypress Other hardwoodsExotic hardwoods Elm-ash-cottonwood Other eastern softwoods Forest-type group Figure 4—Forest area by forest-type group and stand-size class, Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Tennessee County Names
    Tennessee Blue Book About Tennessee Origins of Tennessee County Names As Indian treaties opened up the land that is now Tennessee for settlement, settlers rushed in to clear farms and establish communities. The new inhabitants sought protection for life and property and other benefits of government—courts of law, militia organizations, and legal title to newly acquired land. Counties were quickly organized once migration into the frontier region had begun. Access to the seat of government was a main difficulty for the pioneers, since it was necessary to travel to the county seat to conduct legal business or to present oneself to the court. Over time, residents in areas remote from the county seat would petition the General Assembly for a new county centered closer to their homes. Twenty-two new counties were formed between 1806 and 1819, and twenty-five between 1820 and 1840. This process of carving counties out of the land began in the 1780s and ended a century later. Counties were named for military heroes, American statesmen, physical features, European noblemen, and Indian tribes and settlements, and one was named for a woman. Some counties were authorized but never organized, some organized and then abolished. At present, Tennessee has ninety-five counties, each with its own unique story to tell. Anderson County Created 1801 from Knox and Grainger counties; named in honor of Joseph Anderson (1757– 1847), U.S. senator, judge of the Superior Court of the Territory South of the River Ohio (later Tennessee), and U.S. comptroller of the treasury. Bedford County Created 1807 from Rutherford County and Indian lands; named in honor of Thomas Bedford, Jr.
    [Show full text]