ASW, 5/10, P. 63

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ASW, 5/10, P. 63 ONRECORD Mode Mixup An A320 continued descending after the flight crew initiated a go-around at decision height. BY MARK LACAGNINA The following information provides an aware- but, instead, performed a procedure called a ness of problems in the hope that they can be “TOGA tap,” which involves moving the thrust avoided in the future. The information is based levers briefly into the TOGA detent and then on final reports by official investigative authori- back to the maximum climb power detent. ties on aircraft accidents and incidents. However, in this incident, the thrust levers did not reach the TOGA detent before they were JETS moved back to the climb detent. The PIC said that he heard and felt a thrust ‘TOGA Tap’ Was Ineffective increase, and noticed an apparent increase in Airbus A320-232. No damage. No injuries. pitch attitude, but did not hear the expected an- efore departing from Christchurch, New nouncement by the copilot that a positive rate of Zealand, the morning of July 21, 2007, the climb had been achieved. Bflight crew was aware that fog might pre- At this point, the go-around procedure effec- vent them from landing at Melbourne, Victoria, tively came to a halt, eliminating a timely check Australia, and “had planned accordingly,” said of the flight modes indicated on the primary the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) flight display (PFD), the report said. in a report published in February. Checking and announcing the flight modes As the aircraft neared Melbourne and was are among the actions that Airbus requires sequenced for an instrument landing system to be completed simultaneously when a (ILS) approach to Runway 27, the crews of “a go-around is initiated. However, the opera- number” of preceding aircraft conducted missed tor of the A320 had changed the go-around approaches, the report said. procedure, moving the flight-modes actions The A320 pilot-in-command (PIC), the pilot “to a much later position in the procedure,” flying, conducted the ILS approach with the au- the report said. Confirming and announcing a topilots and autothrottles engaged. “At the deci- positive rate of climb were among the actions sion height, the crew did not have the prescribed preceding the flight modes check and callout visual reference to continue the approach to on the operator’s revised checklist. land and commenced a missed approach,” As a result, the crew did not notice that, the report said. “During the initial part of the because of the PIC’s incomplete TOGA tap, the missed approach, the PIC did not correctly autopilots remained engaged in the glideslope move the thrust levers to the ‘takeoff/go-around’ and localizer modes. [TOGA] position, and, as a result, the aircraft’s The copilot said he noticed that the aircraft automated flight mode did not transition cor- continued to descend after the PIC announced rectly to the go-around mode.” the go-around. “Although aware of the require- The pilot told investigators that, because the ment to alert the pilot flying of the continuing aircraft was light, he did not select TOGA power descent, the copilot was momentarily unable to WWW.FLIGHTSAFETY.ORG | AEROSAFETYWORLD | MAY 2010 | 57 ONRECORD recall the correct phrase to be used,” the report takeoff from Runway 18L at Intersection A, said, noting that the correct phrase is “sink rate.” which is about 2,500 ft (762 m) from the ap- Not hearing the expected “positive rate” proach end of the runway. callout and not seeing the flight director pitch- According to the report by the U.S. Na- command bars rise on the PFD, the PIC “was tional Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the unsure of the status of the aircraft,” the report ground air traffic controller had told the local The A320 was said. “[He] subsequently moved the thrust levers air traffic controller that the PC-12 pilot had re- to the correct position [the TOGA detent], the quested the intersection departure. The ground within 38 ft of the flight mode transitioned to the go-around phase, controller had also noted this on the PC-12’s ground when it and the aircraft responded normally.” flight progress strip and had circled the notation The A320 was within 38 ft of the ground in red, per procedure. began to climb. when it began to climb — 48 seconds after the The report said that the local controller PIC’s incomplete TOGA tap. forgot the verbal briefing by the ground control- The crew conducted another ILS approach ler, did not scan the flight progress strip, did not and an uneventful missed approach before check the PC-12’s position on the airport sur- diverting the flight to Avalon Airport, near face detection equipment (ASDE) display and Geelong, Victoria, where the aircraft was landed did not visually scan the runway to ensure that without further incident. it was clear of traffic before clearing the PC-12 The report said that the aircraft opera- crew for the intersection takeoff — four seconds tor had not analyzed the risks of changing the after clearing the CRJ crew for takeoff. go-around procedure before issuing the revised When the PC-12 entered the runway, the checklist. Its safety management system (SMS) ASDE generated an aural alert: “Warning, Run- did not require formal risk analyses of changes way 18L occupied.” The local controller then ra- to company policies or procedures. dioed the CRJ crew to “cancel takeoff clearance.” “As a result of this occurrence, the aircraft op- However, the CRJ crew had observed the PC- erator changed its go-around procedure to reflect 12 moving toward the runway and had initiated a that of the aircraft manufacturer and [changed] rejected takeoff at about 85 kt, after rolling about its SMS to require a formal risk management 1,600 ft (488 m). The PC-12 pilot taxied the process in support of any proposal to change an airplane to the left side of the runway when he aircraft operating procedure,” the report said. “recognized what was happening,” the report said. The incident also prompted Airbus to The PIC of the CRJ told investigators that “enhance its published go-around procedures to the airplane came to a stop on the runway cen- emphasize the critical nature of the flight crew terline about 3 ft (1 m) from the PC-12. He said actions during a go-around,” the report said. that a collision had been avoided because the PC-12 had “stayed left of the centerline.” Near Collision at an Intersection Bombardier CRJ200, Pilatus PC-12. No damage. No injuries. ‘Saw a Man Riding a Lawn Mower’ isual meteorological conditions (VMC) Boeing 757-200. No damage. No injuries. prevailed at Charlotte (North Carolina, et weather conditions had hindered VU.S.)/Douglas International Airport the grass-cutting operations at Dublin morning of May 29, 2009. Air traffic control W(Ireland) Airport, and it had become (ATC) had instructed the flight crew of the imperative to mow tall grass near the localizer CRJ200, which had 46 people aboard, to line antenna and approach lights for Runway 10. up on the approach end of Runway 18L and to Surface winds were forecast to favor that runway await clearance for takeoff. for an extended period, so airport and ATC The pilot of the PC-12, a single-turboprop authorities arranged to have the mowing done with three people aboard, was holding for the night of May 29, 2009. 58 | FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION | AEROSAFETYWORLD | MAY 2010 ONRECORD Mowing at night is preferred because “cut- “The driver of the [T3] mower was unaware ting close to an active runway during the hours that an aircraft was arriving until he heard it on of daylight is highly problematic due to the the runway behind him,” the report said. The intensity of aircraft movements,” said the report 757 had touched down at 0252 and as it passed by the Irish Air Accident Investigation Unit by the mower, the copilot told the AMC that (AAIU). there was ground equipment on the runway. The driver of a four-wheel vehicle super- “I don’t believe it,” the AMC said. “They guar- vised the operators of three mowing vehicles. anteed me that they were clear of the runway.” The supervisor was able to monitor the local “Could have sworn I saw a man riding a and ground ATC radio frequencies, and to com- lawn mower,” the copilot said. municate with the controllers via a mobile tele- After the serious incident, the Dublin Airport phone. The supervisor and the mowing vehicle Authority complied with an AAIU recommen- operators communicated with each other via dation to ensure that all vehicles operating on hand-held radios set to a discrete frequency. or near active runways be equipped with radios At 0247 local time, the air movements con- capable of monitoring ground and local ATC fre- troller (AMC) told the supervisor to discontinue quencies, flashing yellow lights and transponders mowing operations because of decreasing vis- compatible with the airport’s advanced surface ibility and to report when all the vehicles were movement guidance and control system. clear of the field. The supervisor radioed the mowing vehicle Wing Scraped in Crosswind Landing operators to return to the maintenance base, Airbus A320-211. Minor damage. No injuries. which is on the south side of the airport. He reezing rain caused a two-hour delay in the told investigators that he instructed the opera- A320’s departure from Munich, Germany, tor of mowing vehicle T3, which was near the Ffor a scheduled flight with 132 passengers approach end of Runway 10, to “clear the field” and five crewmembers to Hamburg the after- and use the airport’s south perimeter road to noon of March 1, 2008.
Recommended publications
  • Use of Rudder on Boeing Aircraft
    12ADOBL02 December 2011 Use of rudder on Boeing aircraft According to Boeing the Primary uses for rudder input are in crosswind operations, directional control on takeoff or roll out and in the event of engine failure. This Briefing Leaflet was produced in co-operation with Boeing and supersedes the IFALPA document 03SAB001 and applies to all models of the following Boeing aircraft: 707, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-10, md-11, MD-80, MD-90 Sideslip Angle Fig 1: Rudder induced sideslip Background As part of the investigation of the American Airlines Flt 587 crash on Heading Long Island, USA the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a safety recommendation letter which called Flight path for pilots to be made aware that the use of “sequential full opposite rudder inputs can potentially lead to structural loads that exceed those addressed by the requirements of certification”. Aircraft are designed and tested based on certain assumptions of how pilots will use the rudder. These assumptions drive the FAA/EASA, and other certifica- tion bodies, requirements. Consequently, this type of structural failure is rare (with only one event over more than 45 years). However, this information about the characteristics of Boeing aircraft performance in usual circumstances may prove useful. Rudder manoeuvring considerations At the outset it is a good idea to review and consider the rudder and it’s aerodynamic effects. Jet transport aircraft, especially those with wing mounted engines, have large and powerful rudders these are neces- sary to provide sufficient directional control of asymmetric thrust after an engine failure on take-off and provide suitable crosswind capability for both take-off and landing.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Guide
    Comprehensive Guide 2014 Edition Portrait Of An Outstanding Performer................................... 4 1. TBM 900 Overview....................................................... 22 2. Technical Description................................................... 32 3. Fly in Style.................................................................. 46 4. Master of Performance................................................... 50 5. TBM vs Competitors........................................................ 56 6. Range Finder................................................................. 62 7. World Class Support....................................................... 70 8. Insuring your TBM.......................................................... 80 9. Testimonials.................................................................. 84 10. Contacts..................................................................... 92 TBM 900 A new TBM. Ahead of the firewall, everything is new: a redesigned cowling with more efficient inlet, a simplified plenum to improve airflow, easy nozzle access, inertial separator up to VMO and more. Everything is new... except the engine. The TBM 900 is still powered by the industry standard PT6A, but with all the other improvements, you get the equivalent of 80 more horsepower without increasing fuel consumption. And thanks to the new torque limiter, you can use all 850 horses right from takeoff. When you add this to Hartzell’s new composite five-blade propeller, the TBM 900’s sea-level standard takeoff distance improves
    [Show full text]
  • Top Turboprop Series: We Compare Popular Pre-Owned Models
    FOR THE PILOTS OF OWNER-FLOWN, CABIN-CLASS AIRCRAFT SEPTEMBER 2019 $3.95 US VOLUME 23 NUMBER 9 Top Turboprop Series: We Compare Popular Pre-Owned Models Five Questions The Latest on One Pilot’s with Corporate the Cessna Denali Introduction Angel Network & SkyCourier to Aerobatics Jet It US One year $15.00, two years $29.00 Canadian One year $24.00, two years $46.00 Overseas One Year $52.00, Two Years $99.00 Single copies $6.50 PRIVATE. FAST. SMART. EDITOR Rebecca Groom Jacobs SEPTEMBER2019 • VOL. 23, NO. 9 (316) 641-9463 Contents [email protected] EDITORIAL OFFICE 2779 Aero Park Drive 4 Traverse City, MI 49686 Editor’s Briefing Phone: (316) 641-9463 E-mail: [email protected] 2 A Career Shaped by Turboprops PUBLISHER by Rebecca Groom Jacobs Dave Moore PRESIDENT Position Report Dave Moore 4 What Makes a Turboprop CFO Safer? Answer: You Rebecca Mead PRODUCTION MANAGER by Dianne White Mike Revard PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR Jake Smith GRAPHIC DESIGNER Marci Moon 6 TWIN & TURBINE WEBSITE 6 Top Turboprop Series: www.twinandturbine.com Pre-Owned Piper Meridian ADVERTISING DIRECTOR and Daher TBM 700C2 John Shoemaker Twin & Turbine by Joe Casey 2779 Aero Park Drive Traverse City, MI 49686 12 Five on the Fly with Phone: 1-800-773-7798 Corporate Angel Network Fax: (231) 946-9588 [email protected] by Rebecca Groom Jacobs ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR & REPRINT SALES 14 The Latest on the Betsy Beaudoin Cessna Denali and Phone: 1-800-773-7798 [email protected] SkyCourier ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATIVE by Rich Pickett ASSISTANT Jet It Erika Shenk 22 Intro to Aerobatics Phone: 1-800-773-7798 by Jared Jacobs [email protected] SUBSCRIBER SERVICES Rhonda Kelly Diane Smith Jamie Wilson Molly Costilow 22 Kelly Adamson P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 AOPA Turbine Pilot June
    Farm to Capital First Year Only New Twice DC AERIAL PHOTOS p. 60 REAL-LIFE TURBINE LESSONS p. T-11 FACTORY-FRESH CESSNA 150 p. 50 TURBINE EDITION The Voice of General Aviation aopa.org/pilot | June 2021 | $10.95 June 2021 Beyond Chart Tabs PRECISE FIELD PERFORMANCE p. T-6 Wx Watch FAR-OUT FORECASTS p. 76 TBM Spot Landing Contests | Beyond Chart Tabs | Far-Out Forecasts | Far-Out Chart Tabs | Beyond Contests TBM Spot Landing TBM OWNERSHIP Fast Friends THE ORIGINAL TURBINE SINGLE SPEEDSTER p. T-14 FUN AND SAFETY AT SPOT LANDING CONTESTS p. T-16 aopa.org + Redefining Flight Safety and Performance Photo: Chris Rose The Daher TBM 940 sets the standard for performance, while also taking safety to new levels. After incorporating envelope protection and autothrottle to make loss of control virtually impossible, we have now introduced HomeSafeTM, the emergency autoland system that automatically returns the plane to a runway if the pilot becomes incapacitated. Not to mention the most reliable turboprop in its class, built-in engine safeguards and automatic transmission of critical engine data back to the manufacturer after each flight. Daher, where safety comes first. Speak to a Daher expert: TBM (Americas) (954) 993-8477 (Internaitonal) +33 5 62 41 77 88 www.tbm.aero SAFE TURBINE PILOT QUICK LOOK Daher TBM 700 Fast, efficient personal travel machine BY PETER A. BEDELL DAHER/SOCATA’S TBM 700 is now 30 years old and, despite being the first pressurized turbine single, it’s still the reign- ing speed champ of its category. The 900-series TBMs in production today top out at 330 KTAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Excursions Study
    NLR-CR-2010-259 Executive summary A STUDY OF RUNWAY EXCURSIONS FROM A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE Report no. NLR-CR-2010-259 Author(s) G.W.H. van Es Report classification UNCLASSIFIED Date May 2010 Knowledge area(s) ) Vliegveiligheid (safety & security) Problem area on the European context. The Vliegoperaties Safety statistics show that study was limited to civil Luchtverkeersmanagement(A runway excursions are the most transport type of aircraft (jet and TM)- en luchthavenoperaties common type of accident turboprop) involved in Descriptor(s) reported annually, in the commercial or business Runway safety European region and worldwide. transport flights. Overrun Veeroff Description of work Results and conclusions Runway friction Causal and contributory factors The final results are used to RTO that may lead to a runway define preventive measures for excursion are identified by runway excursions. analysing data of runway excursions that occurred during the period 1980-2008. The scope of this report includes runway excursions that have taken place globally with a focus UNCLASSIFIED NLR-CR-2010-259 NLR Air Transport Safety Institute Anthony Fokkerweg 2, 1059 CM Amsterdam, UNCLASSIFIED P.O. Box 90502, 1006 BM Amsterdam, The Netherlands Telephone +31 20 511 35 00, Fax +31 20 511 32 10, Web site: http://www.nlr-atsi.nl NLR-CR-2010-259 A STUDY OF RUNWAY EXCURSIONS FROM A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE G.W.H. van Es This report may be cited on condition that full credit is given to NLR, the author and EUROCONTROL. This report has also been published as a EUROCONTROL report. This document has been given an NLR report identifier to facilitate future reference and to ensure long term document traceability.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: Morristown, NJ Accident Number: ERA12FA115 Date & Time: 12/20/2011, 1005 EST Registration: N731CA Aircraft: SOCATA TBM 700 Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Loss of control in flight Injuries: 5 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal Analysis Although the pilot filed an instrument flight rules flight plan through the Direct User Access Terminal System (DUATS), no evidence of a weather briefing was found. The flight departed in visual meteorological conditions and entered instrument meteorological conditions while climbing through 12,800 feet. The air traffic controller advised the pilot of moderate rime icing from 15,000 feet through 17,000 feet, with light rime ice at 14,000 feet. The controller asked the pilot to advise him if the icing worsened, and the pilot responded that he would let them know and that it was no problem for him. The controller informed the pilot that he was coordinating for a higher altitude. The pilot confirmed that, while at 16,800 feet, "…light icing has been present for a little while and a higher altitude would be great." About 15 seconds later, the pilot stated that he was getting a little rattle and requested a higher altitude as soon as possible. About 25 seconds after that, the flight was cleared to flight level 200, and the pilot acknowledged. About one minute later, the airplane reached a peak altitude of 17,800 feet before turning sharply to the left and entering a descent. While descending through 17,400 feet, the pilot stated, "and N731CA's declaring…" No subsequent transmissions were received from the flight.
    [Show full text]
  • G1000® Are Registered Trademarks of Garmin Ltd
    ® G1000 Integrated Flight Deck Cockpit Reference Guide System Software 0719.03 or later FLIGHT INSTRUMENTS ENGINE & AIRFRAME SYSTEMS NAV/COM/TRANSPONDER/AUDIO PaNEL AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM GPS NAVIGATION FLIGHT PLANNING PROCEDURES HAZARD AVOIDANCE ADDITIONAL FEATURES ABNORMAL OPERATION ANNUNCIATIONS & ALERTS APPENDIX INDEX Copyright © 2007-2008 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. This manual reflects the operation of System Software version 0719.03 or later for the Socata TBM 850. Some differences in operation may be observed when comparing the information in this manual to earlier or later software versions. Garmin International, Inc., 1200 East 151st Street, Olathe, Kansas 66062, U.S.A. Tel: 913/397.8200 Fax: 913/397.8282 Garmin AT, Inc., 2345 Turner Road SE, Salem, OR 97302, U.S.A. Tel: 503/391.3411 Fax 503/364.2138 Garmin (Europe) Ltd, Liberty House, Bulls Copse Road, Hounsdown Business Park, Southampton, SO40 9RB, U.K. Tel: 44/0870.8501241 Fax: 44/0870.8501251 Garmin Corporation, No. 68, Jangshu 2nd Road, Shijr, Taipei County, Taiwan Tel: 886/02.2642.9199 Fax: 886/02.2642.9099 Web Site Address: www.garmin.com Except as expressly provided herein, no part of this manual may be reproduced, copied, transmitted, disseminated, downloaded or stored in any storage medium, for any purpose without the express written permission of Garmin. Garmin hereby grants permission to download a single copy of this manual and of any revision to this manual onto a hard drive or other electronic storage medium to be viewed for personal use, provided that such electronic or printed copy of this manual or revision must contain the complete text of this copyright notice and provided further that any unauthorized commercial distribution of this manual or any revision hereto is strictly prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Wing Loading on Turbofan Powered Stol Transports with and Without Externally Blown Flaps
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19740005605 2020-03-23T12:06:52+00:00Z NASA CONTRACTOR NASA CR-2320 REPORT CXI CO CNI THE INFLUENCE OF WING LOADING ON TURBOFAN POWERED STOL TRANSPORTS WITH AND WITHOUT EXTERNALLY BLOWN FLAPS by R. L. Morris, C. JR. Hanke, L. H. Pasley, and W. J. Rohling Prepared by THE BOEING COMPANY WICHITA DIVISION Wichita, Kans. 67210 for Langley Research Center NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • NOVEMBER 1973 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA CR-2320 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Reoort Date November. 1973 The Influence of Wing Loading on Turbofan Powered STOL Transports 6. Performing Organization Code With and Without Externally Blown Flaps 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. R. L. Morris, C. R. Hanke, L. H. Pasley, and W. J. Rohling D3-8514-7 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address The Boeing Company 741-86-03-03 Wichita Division 11. Contract or Grant No. Wichita, KS NAS1-11370 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Contractor Report National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes This is a final report. 16. Abstract The effects of wing loading on the design of short takeoff and landing (STOL) transports using (1) mechanical flap systems, and (2) externally blown flap systems are determined. Aircraft incorporating each high-lift method are sized for Federal Aviation Regulation (F.A.R.) field lengths of 2,000 feet, 2,500 feet, and 3,500 feet, and for payloads of 40, 150, and 300 passengers, for a total of 18 point-design aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Version August September 2010
    IDWEST FLYERAUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2010 M AGAZINE Published For & By The Midwest Aviation Community Since 1978 midwestflyer.com Turbine Comfort Zone If you want to stay in your comfort zone, but while cruising at 31,000 feet and with an approach speed slow enough to land on most runways, the TBM 850 from DAHER-SOCATA is for you. Nearly as quick as a light jet, but at a fraction of the cost, the TBM 850 offers substantially more payload and range. Featuring outstanding dependability and ease of handling, the TBM 850 is powered by the Pratt & Whitney PT6A turbine engine and equipped with state-of-the-art Garmin G1000 avionics. The TBM 850’s luxuriously-appointed cabin and distinctive European styling raise the bar even further. We invite you to take the controls for an unforgettable experience, flight after flight. Contact your nearest TBM 850 distributor: www.tbm850.com Tel: (954) 893-1400 (USA) +33 5 62 41 73 01 (International) Delivering performance since 1911 AD OSHKOSH.indd 1 09/07/10 20:17 H ONDAJET MIDWEST Turbine Comfort Zone If you want to stay in your comfort zone, but while cruising at 31,000 feet and with an approach speed slow enough to land on most runways, the TBM 850 from DAHER-SOCATA is for you. Nearly as quick as a light jet, but at a fraction of the cost, the TBM 850 offers substantially more payload and range. Featuring outstanding dependability and ease of handling, the TBM 850 is powered by the Pratt & Whitney PT6A turbine engine and equipped with state-of-the-art Garmin G1000 avionics.
    [Show full text]
  • Crosswind Landings What Could Possibly Go Wrong? by STEVE KROG
    STEVE KROG COMMENTARY / THE CLASSIC INSTRUCTOR Crosswind Landings What could possibly go wrong? BY STEVE KROG CROSSWIND LANDINGS CONTINUE to cause sweaty palms and mild SETTING THE STAGE cases of indigestion whenever discussed among the local gang of We began our flights working from the turf hangar pilots. As many of you have heard me say before, hours of runway, which provided us with a good pleasure flying are missed by many due to a fear of crosswinds. starting point from which to establish a base I recently was working on crosswind landings with a longtime and to measure progress. Other than experi- pilot who was relatively new to tailwheel flying. He had contacted encing a few bounces during the three-point me expressing a desire to become a better, more relaxed, and confi- landing, all went well. The wheel landings dent tailwheel pilot, as he was experiencing a lot of anxiety were equally safe and smooth. His ability to whenever he flew his recently acquired Cub. handle the Cub safely on turf was evident, especially with no crosswind. Then it was time to switch runways and CROSSWIND LANDINGS begin tackling crosswind landings, in this case a crosswind from left to right at approx- imately 30 degrees and 10 mph. It was immediately apparent that his anxiety was WIND building at the mention of a crosswind land- ing. A method I like to use in this situation is to do a crosswind takeoff and closely observe the pilot’s control inputs. He made all the right control movements, but they were very stiff and almost always a split-second behind the aircraft when they were needed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-05 Flyer
    FLIGHT TEST FLIGHT TEST Daher-Socata TBM 900 Daher-Socata TBM 900 Jacques Callies reports on the Tarbes-based manufacturer’s secret project: a complete aerodynamic makeover of the already successful TBM 850. The new TBM 900 is set to become the company’s sole model hree years ago, in the utmost secrecy, the founder of DynAero, known for his creative Daher-Socata gave its design office a talent and mastery of composite materials, which challenge: look at how to improve on the he had demonstrated when manufacturing TBM 850. No need to start from scratch lighter aircraft. Twhen you already have a high-performance We knew that the jet evaluation had served aeroplane which is loved by its pilots and owners, only to confirm that it was not the path to go and which continues to enjoy healthy sales. The down, but that was about it. So on 6 March we result is the new TBM 900. And while the name were quite taken aback to discover that a team of doesn’t mean that the engine develops 900hp, its 125 people had worked on a very different performance in comparison with the TBM 850 project: improving the TBM 850 to make it a might make you think otherwise, as we shall see. more efficient and spectacular aircraft on several Despite regular visits to the factory in Tarbes, in levels, namely performance, handling, noise and the foothills of the Pyrenees, the secret was well carbon footprint. kept. Everyone thought that Daher-Socata was It’s tempting to make a comparison with the working on a completely different aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • AVIATION WEEK Pilot Report: Daher Socata TBM 900 We Fly the Fastest Civil Single-Engine Turboprop May 22, 2014 Fred George | Shownews
    AVIATION WEEK Pilot Report: Daher Socata TBM 900 We fly the fastest civil single-engine turboprop May 22, 2014 Fred George | ShowNews A 325-kt cruise speed may seem slow by light jet standards, but it’s pretty impressive when the aircraft you’re flying only is burning 400 lb. per hour. Daher-Socata’s TBM 900, the latest iteration of the TBM 700, is at least 14 kt faster than TBM 850, based on our flying both aircraft back-to-back. It also needs less runway and climbs faster, plus it uses less fuel and is quieter both inside and outside. Last Thursday, we strapped into the left seat of TBM 900 S/N 1014 with Daher- Socata’s chief pilot Stéphane Jacques at the firm’s plant in Tarbes, France, for a two- hour evaluation of the myriad improvements wrapped into the new model. The preflight walk-around revealed much about what makes the aircraft faster and quieter than its predecessor. Most obvious are the aircraft’s new composite Hartzell five- blade prop and winglets. The Hartzell five-blade incorporates the latest 3-D aero computer modeling, one that analyzes the airflow of the prop around the nose of the aircraft. Socata officials say they looked closely at an advanced prop from MT-Propeller but opted for the Hartzell because the aircraft cruises 3 to 5 kt faster. The winglets were designed in-house at Socata. Their principal benefit is drag reduction at the higher angles of attack encountered during takeoff and climb. They also were added for aesthetic value.
    [Show full text]