DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rattigan the Newsletter of the Terence Rattigan Society ISSUE NO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rattigan the Newsletter of the Terence Rattigan Society ISSUE NO The Rattigan The Newsletter of The Terence Rattigan Society ISSUE NO. 25 JULY 2018 Version Changing views on Rattigan he first time I taught Rattigan in the mid- period regarding The Winslow Boy. One bold student 1970s, he was the second half of a seminar, the declared in response to my question about whether T first half being Shaw. The student reaction I they were moved by Ronnie Winslow’s plight, “I remember most vividly was from a Chinese young think the little bastard did it.” No argument I gave woman. She used a striking image when him would convince him that the play she told me she thought Rattigan was tells us Ronnie is innocent, that without “weak tea” compared to Shaw, in the his innocence the play falls apart. sense that Shaw came on with the big “Back from the ridiculous and on to guns, big ideas, big characters, most of the sublime: somewhere during the late them fighters, ready to argue with one 1990s the students had changed in their another, trying to persuade one another, views of Rattigan. The turning point trying to dominate others or assert them- became evident to me when teaching selves. To her, because Rattigan’s charac- Flare Path—a play I thought to be a ters were weak, his plays were weak. As masterpiece upon first reading. I noticed Jacques Barzun has pointed out, if you An extract from the change of attitude when I was dis- open a Shaw play to any page and begin cussing the scene where Teddy breaks reading you will think the characters are Professor John down in front of his wife, Patricia, and discussing life and death issues. Ratti- A. Bertolini’s reveals the part of himself he has hidden gan’s characters are more likely to address at the from everyone including his wife. He retreat from self-assertion, to hide them- Annual Birthday tries to convey the feelings he has selves and their pain, or if they do assert Dinner whenever he goes on a mission in which themselves, it will be at a great cost. he bears the responsibility for seeing “The next time I taught Rattigan was in a Modern that his men return alive. Teddy tries to express the British Drama course, where I was able to test The fear he experiences and the connection he feels to his Deep Blue Sea against Look Back in Anger, a play I men. He says to Patricia, “I’m their captain.” And dislike intensely, the book of which I usually abuse in then he repeats the last two words, “Their captain”— class by jumping up and down on it, to convey to the a separate sentence that is as understated as it can be students my feelings. Much to my chagrin, though and therefore implies so much about the great burden they liked Deep Blue Sea quite a bit, when we subse- of being responsible for their lives. quently read Look Back, they opined that they found “Henceforth whenever I taught Rattigan, the it more exciting and provocative than Deep Blue Sea. students responded intensely, particularly to the One representative student in particular was drawn to emotions of the plays especially where they were Jimmy Porter’s violent rhetoric, shouted from the conveyed through Rattigan’s highly wrought window on the street. language of understatement and implication.” “I must now insert a comic memory from this same For a report on the Birthday Dinner see page 3... THE ANNUAL BIRTHDAY DINNER, PP 1, 3 ROGER MILLS ON KEEPING REVIVALS SIMPLE, PP 2, 3 THE WINSLOW BOY ON TOUR, PP 4, 5, 8 OBITUARY: ROSALINDA ZAZZERA, P 6 IN APPRECIATION OF PATRICK LONGFORD, P 7 1 PERSONAL DATA, P 8 / DIARY DATES / TOADS, P 8 The Terence Rattigan Society President: David Suchet CBE Vice-Presidents: Michael Darlow, Lord Fellowes, Dr. Holly Hill, Greta Scacchi, Geoffrey Wansell Chairman Barbara Longford Membership Secretary Diana Scotney Treasurer Andrew Kenyon Newsletter Editor Giles Cole Webmaster Stephen Bradley Theatre Liaison Michael Wheatley-Ward Media Liaison/Co-Editor Roger Mills US Representative Dr. Holly Hill Drama School Liaison Prof. Michael Gaunt Secretary & RAF Liaison Gp. Capt. Clive Montellier Events Liaison Susan Cooper OBE, FCIPD, FCMI, RAF Email: [email protected] Editor’s note: Any views expressed in this newsletter are those of the individual author and do not necessarily represent the views of The Terence Rattigan Society or its Committee. owed more of a debt to Brian Rix than any other Keep Revivals Simple theatrical figure of living memory. Well that’s the view says Roger Mills of yours truly who knows the piece and has seen it a few times. My family, who’d not, thought it was a good ————————————————— show and enjoyed it thoroughly. Which just goes to Four revivals of twentieth century plays, three from the show something. The reviews were similarly split. But forties, seen in around six weeks displayed such varied my question here concerns again the duty to the play approaches I fell to wondering how directors and actors and the playwright. Crudely, would the newcomer gain should ideally approach such things. Mind you, the any sense of the real Coward, the delicacy, the wit, the really furious thinking kicked off after one of my pathos from this pratfall-packed highly physical and infrequent exposures to Brecht, which brought back all bellowed interpretation? that ‘nature of theatre’ stuff imbibed in seventies LAMDA’s final year acting seminar rooms—time which would have been better student’s version of Coward’s spent in the bar. Hay Fever (1925) on the stage of So I’ll deal first with the Royal Central’s production their very pleasant new of The Caucasian Chalk Circle (1948) in the new Sainsbury Theatre just round the translation by Frank McGuiness. Sadly for me this was corner from Barons Court tube an almost total disappointment. OK, this production, in contrast was a delight. And which had two directors, was obviously designed to yet Hay Fever is nearly as big a show what as many as possible final year students could temptation for broadness and do. It ended up with too many cooks spoiling the pot sheer silliness as Present and sank torpedoed by the weight of the sometimes Laughter, with which it shares many similarities in my conflicting ideas it was expected to bear. The plot, which view. But this was resisted and in a fairly straight is essentially simple, was lost to view amongst a mêlée of reading, which let the lines have their full value, the acting and technical notions, a grossly intrusive sound humour flowed unforced and naturally. I spoke to some design, and the distraction of an ‘in the round’ of the cast afterwards and Coward was to all a new, but I presentation which left the audience opposite and the felt a pleasant, discovery. Coward wasn’t much older technical crew in clear view. Some of this was based, I than an undergrad when he wrote this piece and the cast suspect, on Brecht’s theories of the theatre driven by the I think instinctively knew this and reacted to it. urge of doing right by the playwright’s views but the Which brings me to The Winslow Boy (1944) which result was overthought and overwrought. I got the opened at Chichester in February and completed its tour impression the students were having a blast. I could see, at Richmond in May. I don’t expect ever to see a better or think I could see, what they and the show were version - or indeed a better Arthur Winslow than that trying to do. For that reason I’d vote it in the end a very given us by Aden Gillett (see our review on pp 4 & 5). I noble failure. can pay it no higher compliment than to say I felt for all The cast of Chichester Festival Theatre’s revival of the world as if I was seeing this wonderful piece for the Noel Coward’s Present Laughter (1942) seemed also to first time. Even its Edwardian setting seemed somehow be having a blast, none more so than the lead Rufus contemporary and relevant. Insight followed insight, Hound. For me Deputy Dawg might have felt equally at delight followed delight. Best of all was the sense of the home in this unceasingly noisy overblown farce which Winslows as an ordinary family trying to do their best in 2 extraordinary circumstances with Arthur more The Annual Birthday Dinner wracked by doubts than he is allowed in many an A report by Michael Wheatley-Ward interpretation. And yet there was nothing novel here, _____________________________ no line I hadn’t heard a zillion times before, no new version, no bells and whistles. It was a straight down The Society could not have organised the Annual the middle interpretation by an ensemble of unusual Birthday Dinner better. Not only was it Terence mutual sympathy where one could ‘hear the music’ so Rattigan’s birthday but also the 100th Anniversary of clearly on its own terms. It should be running in the the RAF, in which he played a significant part. The West End yet and Rachael Kavanaugh showered with weather was also less humid than in the recent past! awards.… We offer a big thank you to Denis Moriarty, a If this quartet has convinced staunch TRS member and our host for the evening. me of anything it’s that revivals Denis is a long-standing member of the venerable are best when they keep things Oxford and Cambridge Club.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIRECTED by JULES AARON PRODUCED by DAVID HUNT STAFFORD Set Designer
    WHO’S WHO IN THEATRE FORTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jim Jahant, Chairperson Lya Cordova-Latta Dr. Robert Karns Charles Glenn Myra Lurie Frederick G. Silny, Treasurer David Hunt Stafford, Secretary Gloria Stroock Bonnie Webb Marion Zola ARTISTIC COMMITTEE Gail Johnston • Jennifer Laks • Alison Blanchard Diana Angelina • Cathy Diane Tomlin • Leda Siskind ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF David Hunt Stafford . .Artistic/Managing Director Jennifer Parsons . .Bookkeeper Richard Hoyt Miller . .Database Manager Philip Sokoloff . .Director of Public Relations Jay Bell . .Reservationist Dean Wood . .Box Office Manager Susan Mermet . .Assistant Box Office Manager Larry Rubinstein . .Technology Guru PRODUCTION STAFF Artistic/Managing Director David Hunt Stafford Set Design Jeff G. Rack Costume Design Michèle Young Lighting Design J. Kent Inasy Sound Design Paolo Greco Makeup/Wigs/Hair Desi gn Judi Lewin Photographer Ed Kreiger Program Design Richard Hoyt Miller Publicity Philip Sokoloff Reservations & Information Jay Bell / 310-364-0535 THEATRE FORTY PRESENTS The 6th Production of the 2016-2017 Season SeparateSeparate TablesTables BY TERENCE RATTIGAN DIRECTED BY JULES AARON PRODUCED BY DAVID HUNT STAFFORD Set Designer..............................................JEFF G. RACK Costume Designer................................MICHÈLE YOUNG Lighting Designer....................................J. KENT INASY Sound Designer ........................................PAOLO GRECO Makeup/Wigs/Hair Designer.....................JUDI LEWIN Stage Manager.........................................DON SOLOSAN Assistant Stage Manager ..................RICHARD CARNER Assistant Director.................................JORDAN HOXSIE PRODUCTION NOTES "Loneliness is a terrible thing, don't you agree." "Yes I do agree. A terrible thing." -- Separate Tables SPECIAL THANKS Theatre 40 would like to thank the BHUSD Board of Education and BH High School administration for their assistance and support in making Theatre 40’s season possible. Thanks to… HOWARD GOLDSTEIN LISA KORBATOV NOAH MARGO MEL SPITZ ISABEL HACKER DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattigan Version 33 – Jul 2020
    The Rattigan The Newsletter of The Terence Rattigan Society ISSUE NO. 33 JULY 2020 Version When the show doesn’t go on his will always be remembered as the year of generally held good. Until now. the lockdown, as no one will need reminding. Well, public health does have to come first. And T It has pulled the rug from under people’s lives governments do have to make very tough decisions. It in an extraordinary and devastating fashion. And the is not the business of this newsletter to take this, or world of theatre and performance arts has suffered any, government to task, nor to criticise (or praise) perhaps its deadliest blow since the Puritans closed all the way this crisis has been handled, but it is the theatres and places of business of this news- entertainment in the letter to observe that mid-17th century. somehow theatre ‘will As The Stage news- always out’ in one way paper reminded us or another, even in recently, the govern- the most adverse ment ordered no circumstances. closures during the First A perfect example World War, and perfor- of this is the rehearsed mances continued reading produced by during Zeppelin raids. Jermyn Street Theatre Similarly, there were on 26 May of one of no such closures during A screenshot from the online rehearsed reading of In Praise of Rattigan’s later plays, Love streamed by Jermyn Street Theatre via YouTube on 26 the Spanish ’Flu May, featuring Jack Klaff, Issy van Randwyck, Andrew Francis In Praise of Love. The epidemic of 1918-19 (all pictured) and Mackenzie Heynes, directed by Cat Robey.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous Material
    Belknap Collection for the Performing Arts Cinema Miscellaneous Material MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL The Belknap PHOTOGRAPH collection preserves thousands of shimmering PUBLICITY and PRODUCTION images dating back to the age of Victorian theatre and spanning 20th century vaudeville, Broadway, radio and television. The photos are filed alphabetically by performer name or show title. Performer Production Stills A treasure trove of eclectic information is available in the FLORIDA PERFORMING ARTS VERTICAL FILE highlighting the STATE OF FLORIDA ("Dance Associations", 'Story Tellers", "Theatre Conference", etc), individual CITIES AND TOWNS (from the Panhandle to the Keys in an alphabetical listing), and the city of GAINESVILLE (including the University of Florida) performing arts scene. Florida Vertical File Cities and Towns Vertical File Gainesville Vertical File Trevor "Tommy" Bale epitomized the versatile "circus man" who "did it all" in the center ring and behind the scenes. Noted as one of the world's greatest tiger trainers, Bale was also known as a gifted clown, acrobat, trick bicyclist, vaudevillian and ringmaster. Bale's unpublished and unedited autobiographical manuscript ( written under the guidance of famed ghostwriter and editor Walter B. Gibson - creator of THE SHADOW), paints an exciting picture of the early 20th century European vaudeville and circus circuits. Bale vividly describes the triumphs, glory, pain and agony of life on the road, culminating in Bale's headlining contract with the Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey Circus in the mid 1950s. The TREVOR "TOMMY" BALE COLLECTION promises three rings (and more) full of circus lore. The John W. Lindell Collection includes cartoon, comic strip and animation art anthologies and histories collected by John W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rattigan the Newsletter of the Terence Rattigan Society ISSUE NO
    The Rattigan The Newsletter of The Terence Rattigan Society ISSUE NO. 16 DECEMBER 2015 Version The Society plays Follow My Leader in clubland When, like us, you don’t actually have to have side the political commentary, there’s a vein of an AGM, it can be a challenge to put together an broad humour, typified by the party greeting, ‘Up event that will make it worth the effort for our Zedesi!’. Fortunately, with the love of a good members to attend. But when you have members woman behind him, Zedesi rebels and overthrows like Adrian Brown and Denis the regime. In a final speech, Moriarty eager to do their part he rues that his artisan coun- to make the Society a success, terpart in Germany is bound the challenge disappears. So it for a nasty end – ‘He should was that, courtesy of Denis’ have stuck to house painting’. hospitality, we gathered in the Ironically, Follow My elegant surroundings of the Leader proved too controver- Oxford and Cambridge Club in sial for the Lord Chamberlain; London’s Pall Mall to enjoy not in the mood of appeasement only an excellent meal but also of 1938, an attack on the a rehearsed reading of Ratti- German leadership might gan’s Follow My Leader under Clive Montellier prove too provocative and the Adrian’s expert direction. play was banned (ironic, too, reports on the curtain-raiser to As Adrian explained to us that Rattigan would in later the AGM Dinner in Pall Mall after a relaxing pre-dinner years be condemned for being glass, Follow My Leader was, a ‘safe’ writer).
    [Show full text]
  • X X Teaching Resources
    X X Teaching resources Researched and written by Bryony Roberts The Winslow Boy Teaching Resources Page 1 of 28 Contents The Winslow Boy at The Old Vic 3 Terence Rattigan: His Story 4 Rattigan: Life and Works 5 The Winslow Boy Synopsis 6 Act Breakdown 7 Character Breakdown 11 The Real Winslow Boy 13 The Petition of Right 15 Read All About It! 16 Historical Context The Threat of War 18 Fight for the Right: The Suffragettes 19 The Winslow Boy Themes 20 In conversation with… Henry Goodman (Arthur Winslow) 21 Naomi Frederick (Catherine Winslow) 23 Charlie Rowe (Ronnie Winslow) 25 Peter Sullivan (Sir Robert Morten) 27 Bibliography 28 The Winslow Boy Teaching Resources Page 2 of 28 The Winslow Boy Cast Sia Berkeley Deborah Findlay Naomi Frederick Henry Goodman Miss Barnes Grace Winslow Catherine Winslow Arthur Winslow Nick Hendrix Stephen Joseph Wendy Nottingham Charlie Rowe Dickie Winslow Fred Violet Ronnie Winslow Peter Sullivan Richard Teverson Jay Villiers Sir Robert Morton John Watherstone Desmond Curry The Winslow Boy Teaching Resources Page 3 of 28 TERENCE RATTIGAN HIS STORY Born 10 June 1911 in Kensington, Terence Rattigan is considered to be one of Britain’s most well-respected dramatists. Rattigan was born to a distinguished family just before the coronation of King George V (a ceremony that his father had a small role in). Initially he lived with his parents, travelling with them as they were posted overseas. However, when he was two years old, his paternal grandmother, Lady Rattigan, took over his care and he remained based in London. It was during this period that he became interested in the theatre, as he saw his first show aged six years old –Cinderella – which enthralled him.
    [Show full text]
  • Terence Davies and the Cinema: an Intertextual Study of His Films James Andrew Ballands Phd University of York Theatre, Film
    Terence Davies and the Cinema: An Intertextual Study of His Films James Andrew Ballands PhD University of York Theatre, Film and Television September 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the oeuvre of the British filmmaker Terence Davies between 1976 and 2011. Overall, his work from this period can be separated into two distinct categories: autobiographical films and literary adaptations. Whereas previous critical works on this writer-director have often framed him as an auteur due to the considerable creative control that he exerts over his films, this thesis problematizes such a reading by situating his body of work within a larger intertextual field. Within this field, I include other films, literary texts and pieces of music, in order to explore how other cultural influences have been channelled into Davies’s filmmaking. I also explore the idea that his memories of growing up in Liverpool – particularly during the 1950s – constitute another intertext within his autobiographical films. Similarly, I demonstrate how considering the creative input of his key collaborators – including producers, cinematographers, editors and production designers – illuminates both Davies’s approach to filmmaking and the dense construction of his films as texts. Unlike other critical writings on Davies’s career, my thesis considers the audience’s engagement with his films and the readings they generate from them. This thesis adopts a multi-disciplinary approach to Davies’s films by engaging with various branches of study within the arts, including post-structuralist theory, autobiographical studies, adaptation studies, music theory, auteur theory and production studies. Furthermore, this thesis includes insights that have been gathered from eighteen original interviews with individuals involved in the making of Terence Davies’s films – including one with the filmmaker himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattigan Version April 2019 Final for Triographics
    The Rattigan The Newsletter of The Terence Rattigan Society April 2019 Issue No. 28 Version Having a Ball at Oxford! Roger Mills reports on our second Harold & Pegs French Award production Welcoming us to the Oxford School of Drama founder and Principal George Peck, I think, astonished many-probably all-by revealing that the school was the first to revive After the Dance preceding the 2002 Cockpit Theatre revival and leading Michael Billington to take the trip to North Oxford to see the show. Billington, George told us, had this to say: “As with No 11 buses, so with this early 1939 play by Terence Rattigan: you wait ages for a revival and then two come along at once. Dominic Dromgoole is to direct the play in the autumn. But he has been pipped at the post by the enterprising Oxford School of Chairman Barbara Longford presents our cheque to George Peck Drama who prove it to be a fascinating exploration of Rattigan's abiding theme: the inequality of passion and the fatal danger of repressing three percent of the people that apply to us. Unlike some feeling.” the famous drama schools now with hundreds and “So if that isn’t a good reason for doing the play,” hundreds of students we have only 38 graduates a year. George continued, “I don’t know what it. I mean he is a We work very hard with them.” great craftsman. We love doing his plays as they are good “We came here after starting in Oxford. You can’t vehicles to teach the students because they have strong really find premises in the city.
    [Show full text]