DOCSLIB.ORG

SUMMER Vol: 1/2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUMMER Vol: 1/2017 SUMMER Vol: 1/2017 Photo: Doug Gimesy FLORA AND FAUNA OF SYDNEY’S NORTH HEAD More images and information on Sydney’s hidden gem, go to page 23 Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub is a nationally and state-listed endangered scrub and heath vegetation community. The barking owl is a medium-sized owl with bright yellow eyes and no facial disc. Upper parts are brown or greyish-brown, and the white breast is vertically streaked with brown. The large talons are yellow. Grass tree (Xanthorrea spp.). An iconic part of the Australian landscape, the grass tree is widespread across eastern New South Wales. These Australian native plants have a thick fi re-blackened trunk and long spiked Smooth-barked apple (Angophora costata), also known as Sydney red leaves. They are abundant in the heath habitat at North Head. The grass gum or rusty gum trees. Growing to heights of 15−30 metres, the russet- tree grows 1 to 5 metres in height and produces striking white-fl owered coloured angophoras shed their bark in spring to reveal spectacular new spikes which grow up to 1 metre long. salmon-coloured bark. 2 Australian Wildlife Vol 1 - Summer 2018 Contents features regulars Footprints in water: In search From the President’s desk 7 of the elusive platypus 5 - Doug Gimesy Book reviews Platypus ‘Death Traps’ 30 11 - Geoff Williams Be a part of the Australian Is it too late for the koala? 7 20 34 Wildlife Society’s conservation 13 - Linda Dennis work Extinction is not an option - Membership form 17 Introducing Aussie Ark: Giving 35 hope to an entire ecosystem Black Mountain: Forbidding 20 place or refuge - Sabine Borgis Sydney’s hidden gem 23 - Suzanne Medway 13 23 The thin green line: A 27 consortium of partners and landowners enhancing a critical wildlife corridor - David Rush 17 26 Suzanne Medway AM 18 27 Editor, Australian Wildlife On the cover: Front Cover: Platypus taken at Upper Tarago River, SUMMER Vol: 1/2017 Neerim, Victoria. Photo: Doug Gimesy Back Cover: A platypus out feeding at dawn. Photo: Doug Gimesy Sabine Borgis Sub-Editor, Australian Wildlife Australian Wildlife Vol 1 - Summer 2018 3 Australian Wildlife is the offi cial journal of the Australian Wildlife Society (Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia Limited). Founded in 1909, the Society is dedicated to the conservation of our unique Australian wildlife in all its forms. Print Post Approval No: PP243459/00117 Conserving Australia’s Wildlife ISSN 0155-266X since 1909 Price $10 (for non-members) Membership Contact Directors 2017 Individual Members: $55 National Offi ce Patron Australian Wildlife Society Family Members: $70 (Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia Limited) His Excellency General the Honourable (being husband, wife and children jointly) Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Retd) Concession: $50 PO Box 42 (pensioner, student, child) BRIGHTON LE SANDS NSW 2216 President E-mag Members: $30 Tel: (02) 9556 1537 Suzanne Medway AM (Australian Wildlife magazine will be distributed Email: [email protected] via email as a pdf document - no hard copy of the Hon Secretary/Chief Executive Offi cer Accounts: [email protected] magazine will be sent) Patrick W Medway AM Associate Members: $85 Editor “Australian Wildlife”: (being schools or incorporated or unincorporated [email protected] Vice Presidents associations with a principal object related to Website: aws.org.au Stephen Grabowski and Ken Mason conservation, nature study or education) Corporate Members: $125 Hon Treasurer (being incorprated or unincorporated associations Membership Hotline: Sash Denkovski not being associate members) Includes postage within Australia. Mob: 0424 287 297 Directors Add $40 for overseas postage Christine Banks Noel Cislowski AM Three Year Trevor Evans Membership Wayne Greenwood Dr Clive Williams OAM Individual Members: $150 Family Members: $190 Scientifi c Advisory Committee Correspondence to: Concession: $135 Dr Mike Augee - mammology/palaeontology Hon Secretary: E-mag Members: $81 Prof Richard Kingsford - environmental science Associate Members: $230 Australian Wildlife Society Geoffrey Ross - wildlife management issues Corporate Members: $340 PO Box 42 Includes postage within Australia. Jennie Gilbert - marine conservation BRIGHTON LE SANDS NSW 2216 Add $100 for overseas postage Vanessa Wilson - wildlife conservation and management Notice to our members Our Mission The Australian Wildlife Society (Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia Limited) is managed The Australian Wildlife Society (Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia Limited) is an and controlled by an elected board of ten volunteer directors. The Society is a registered independent, voluntary, non-profi t conservation organisation, formed in 1909, and company limited by guarantee with ASIC and is responsible for complying with all its is committed to the preservation of Australia’s precious fl ora and fauna. We act as regulations. a watchdog and provide advice to government agencies and institutions regarding environmental and conservation issues concerning all aspects of wildlife preservation. Any member who might like to consider serving as a director of the Society is invited to Our mission is to conserve Australia’s fauna and fl ora through education and contact the national offi ce for more details. The most important qualifi cation to serving as a involvement of the community. We are dedicated to the conservation of our unique director is ‘a commitment to and love of Australian wildlife’. Australian wildlife in all its forms through national environmental education programs, The Society holds regular monthly meetings on the fi rst Wednesday of each month in political lobbying, advocacy and hands on conservation work. Sydney. Our Society has always known that a conservation battle is never really won until The Editor would like to feature a member’s profi le in the fortnightly email newsletter and the victory is enshrined in legislation. We have always tried to convince politicians of occasionally in our quarterly magazine. Members are invited to consider submitting a short the necessity to include the preservation of Australia’s precious wildlife and its vital article with a photograph for possible publication. conservation habitat in all their planning and environmental issues and discussions. Articles and comments expressed in this magazine do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the Editor, Society or members. Articles contributed from outside sources are included for the reading enjoyment of members and to encourage discussion on different points of view. Articles may be copied or quoted with appropriate attribution. 4 Australian Wildlife Vol 1 - Summer 2018 From the President’s desk Suzanne Medway AM - President Seeing a wild native animal is something special – unexpected and unpredictable. It’s a sign that nature is alive and well. We all come into contact with wildlife Anti-zoo and animal rights groups All zoological and wildlife parks are at some time in our lives. We see and such as CAPS, PETA or the Born inspected annually by government smell wildƪ owers, listen to birds, Free Foundation claim that zoos agencies and must meet rigid and at night we may be lucky enough are inherently cruel. They highlight standards. to cross paths with a possum or a animals housed in small cages for “our wallaby. Seeing a wild native animal is entertainment” and claim all should be The Royal Zoological Society of New something special – unexpected and released back into the wild. South Wales is concerned with the unpredictable. It’s a sign that nature study and conservation of Australia’s But zoo design has moved a long is alive and well. Unfortunately, we native fauna, and the education of its way since the bad days of bare often see Australian wildlife dead on members and the general public on concrete cages, and indeed innovative the side of our roads – the victims these subjects. Its objectives are to enclosures these days can closely of roadkill. Hundreds of thousands promote and advance the science of replicate an animal’s wild habitats. of animals are killed each year after zoology, and to protect, preserve and conserve the indigenous animals of being hit by motor vehicles on Overall, zoos provide opportunities Australia and their associated habitats. Australian roads. For many people, to observe and engage with exotic their deaths are considered to be sad – animals, many of which may be The World Association of Zoos but inevitable. threatened with extinction in the and Aquariums is the voice of a wild. Seeing them up close can spark a global community of high standard, To experience wildlife in its natural passion for biology, conservation and conservation-based zoos and environment brings us in touch with the environment. aquariums. Its mission is to act as a a diơ erent world where people are the outsiders. Wildlife lives by natural rules, not by human values. If we try to feed or pat a wild animal, this will have an impact on it, particularly AGM and Annual as more and more people visit our natural areas. But for the majority of people, their only chance to see Luncheon native Australian wildlife is in zoos or The 109th AGM of the Wildlife Preservation Society of wildlife parks. Australia trading as Australian Wildlife Society will be The role of zoos in wildlife held on Wednesday 7 March 2018, to be followed by the conservation Society’s annual luncheon. The Agenda and luncheon details appear at the end of this magazine. Modern zoos aim to promote animal conservation, educate people, and In accordance with the Society’s Constitution, under Clause support further wildlife research. 10, three directors are retiring. Two directors are offering The three are entwined to ensure the themselves for re-election – this will leave a vacancy on animals are housed to the highest possible standards of welfare. Staơ the board. Any suitably qualifi ed member interested in are dedicated to providing species- serving on the Board should complete Schedule 3 of the speciƤ c housing, appropriate diets and Constitution (available from the national offi ce) and return husbandry to ensure that the animals’ the completed form by 15 February 2018.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scincidae: Liburnascincus) from Rocky Habitat on Cape York, Northeast Australia
    Zootaxa 3994 (3): 222–234 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3994.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FF5A5B78-4BF6-4225-AF4B-527C06BDF6E5 A new skink (Scincidae: Liburnascincus) from rocky habitat on Cape York, northeast Australia CONRAD J. HOSKIN1 & PATRICK J. COUPER2 1Centre for Tropical Biodiversity & Climate Change, College of Marine & Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Towns- ville, Queensland 4811, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Natural Environments Program, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia Abstract The genus Liburnascincus is composed of saxicoline skinks restricted to northeast Australia. This small radiation consists of one widespread species, L. mundivensis, found in a variety of rocky habitats in eastern Queensland, and two localized species, L. coensis and L. scirtetis, restricted to granite boulder habitats on Cape York Peninsula, in north Queensland. Here we describe a fourth species, L. artemis sp. nov., from the Bamboo Range, a low rocky range on Cape York. As for other Liburnascincus, the new species is a saxicoline skink that is active on boulder surfaces primarily early and late in the day. Liburnascincus artemis sp. nov. is most similar to L. mundivensis but can be diagnosed based on longer limbs, higher toe and finger lamellae counts, lower midbody scale count, and other aspects of morphology, scalation and colour pattern. Liburnascincus artemis sp. nov. is currently known from a very small area but further surveys will likely extend the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006
    Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Current as at 1 September 2017 Queensland Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title . 5 2 Commencement . 5 3 Purpose . 5 4 Definitions . 6 5 Scientific names . 6 Part 2 Classes of native wildlife and declared management intent for the wildlife Division 1 Extinct in the wild wildlife 6 Native wildlife that is extinct in the wild wildlife . 7 7 Declared management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 8 Significance of extinct in the wild wildlife to nature and its value 8 9 Proposed management intent for extinct in the wild wildlife . 8 10 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of extinct in the wild wildlife 9 Division 2 Endangered wildlife 11 Native wildlife that is endangered wildlife . 10 12 Declared management intent for endangered wildlife . 10 13 Significance of endangered wildlife to nature and its value . 10 14 Proposed management intent for endangered wildlife . 11 15 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of endangered wildlife . 12 Division 3 Vulnerable wildlife 16 Native wildlife that is vulnerable wildlife . 13 17 Declared management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 13 18 Significance of vulnerable wildlife to nature and its value . 13 19 Proposed management intent for vulnerable wildlife . 14 20 Principles for the taking, keeping or use of vulnerable wildlife . 15 Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Contents Division 4 Near threatened wildlife 26 Native wildlife that is near threatened wildlife . 16 27 Declared management intent for near threatened wildlife . 16 28 Significance of near threatened wildlife to nature and its value .
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Society of Herpetologists
    1 THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF HERPETOLOGISTS INCORPORATED NEWSLETTER 48 Published 29 October 2014 2 Letter from the editor This letter finds itself far removed from last year’s ASH conference, held in Point Wolstoncroft, New South Wales. Run by Frank Lemckert and Michael Mahony and their team of froglab strong, the conference featured some new additions including the hospitality suite (as inspired by the Turtle Survival Alliance conference in Tuscon, Arizona though sadly lacking of the naked basketball), egg and goon race and bouncing castle (Simon’s was a deprived childhood), as well as the more traditional elements of ASH such as the cricket match and Glenn Shea’s trivia quiz. May I just add that Glenn Shea wowed everyone with his delightful skin tight, anatomically correct, and multi-coloured, leggings! To the joy of everybody in the world, the conference was opened by our very own Hal Cogger (I love you Hal). Plenary speeches were given by Dale Roberts, Lin Schwarzkopf and Gordon Grigg and concurrent sessions were run about all that is cutting edge in science and herpetology. Of note, award winning speeches were given by Kate Hodges (Ph.D) and Grant Webster (Honours) and the poster prize was awarded to Claire Treilibs. Thank you to everyone who contributed towards an update and Jacquie Herbert for all the fantastic photos. By now I trust you are all preparing for the fast approaching ASH 2014, the 50 year reunion and set to have many treats in store. I am sad to not be able to join you all in celebrating what is sure to be, an informative and fun spectacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences
    " , , # # Carlia Population from Java and Population from George R. Zug Carlia (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) Washington, District of Columbia 20013-7012 USA; Email: [email protected]. Washington, An Outlying Comments on Species Groups within the Genus Comments on Species Groups Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Zoology, Department of Vertebrate # " , , # # PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Series 4, Volume 61, No. 8, pp. 389–408, 3 figs., 3 tables, Appendix September 15, 2010 An Outlying Carlia Population from Java and Comments on Species Groups within the Genus Carlia (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) George R. Zug Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia 20013-7012 USA; Email: [email protected]. A population of Carlia occurs on Pulau Tindjil off the southwest tip of Java, distant from all other populations and species. A set of unique traits identifies the Tindjil Carlia as a new taxon; it is described herein. The new species has its closest affinities to populations (C. peronii, C. spinauris) living on Timor. Although the latter species has been considered a synonym of the former one, evidence is presented indicating that each name represents a unique species, a lowland and a montane one, respec- tively. Comparison of Carlia species is aided by the establishment of groups of pre- sumed related species; these species groups are named and morphologically defined here. KEY WORDS: Squamata, Scincidae, Carlia peronii, Carlia spinauris, Lesser Sunda Islands, Java, geographic variation, new species, intrageneric relationships, nomenclature. Carlia, the four-fingered skink, is a moderately diverse genus of Australopapuan lizards.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective
    Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment for the Importation of Native Reptiles
    RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPORTATION OF NATIVE REPTILES INTO THE ACT Will Osborne and Murray Evans Technical Report 31 May 2015 Conservation Planning and Research | Environment Division | Environment and Planning Directorate Technical Report 31 Risk assessment for the importation of native reptiles into the ACT Will Osborne and Murray Evans Conservation Research Environment Division Environment and Planning Directorate May 2015 ISBN: 978-0-9871175-5-7 © Environment and Planning Directorate, Canberra, 2015 Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information or educational purposes, subject to appropriate referencing of the source. This document should be cited as: Osborne W and Evans M. 2015. Risk assessment for the importation of native reptiles into the ACT. Technical Report 31. Environment and Planning Directorate, ACT Government, Canberra. http://www.environment.act.gov.au Telephone: Canberra Connect 13 22 81 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views, opinions or policy of funding bodies or participating member agencies or organisations. Front cover: All Photographs ACT Government. L to R: Water Dragon, Brown Snake, Bearded Dragon, Marbled Gecko. Native Reptile Import Risk Assessment Contents 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material Ecological Consequences of Land Clearing And
    10.1071/PC17001_AC CSIRO 2017 Pacific Conservation Biology 23(3), 219–230 Supplementary Material Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland April E. ResideA,D, Jutta BeherA, Anita J. CosgroveB, Megan C. EvansB,C, Leonie SeabrookB, Jennifer L. SilcockA, Amelia S. WengerB and Martine MaronA,B ACentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. BCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Contents Table S1. List of environmental programs funded by State and Federal Governments that are potentially undermined by ongoing broad-scale land clearing in Queensland, and calculated costs for issues exacerbated by land clearing Table S2. Percentage area of preclearing Regional Ecosystems in 1999 dominated by woody vegetation, percentage area of remnant Regional Ecosystems in 1999 dominated by woody vegetation, area of woody vegetation cleared since 1999, and area of woody vegetation cleared for pasture since 1999 in Queensland Text S1. Methodology for Table S2 and Fig. 3 Fig. S1. Regional ecosystem maps used to calculate the change in woody vegetation in Queensland. Table S3. List of threatened terrestrial fauna species in Queensland under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) grouped by threatening process Page 1 of 11 Table S1. List of environmental programs funded by State and Federal Governments that are potentially undermined by ongoing broad-scale land clearing in Queensland, and calculated costs for issues exacerbated by land clearing Program name or general cost based Source of Program Overall Spending Comment Source on studies funding time spending per year frame Agri-environmental schemes: Australian 1990– $6.51 Hajkowicz, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 59
    Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 59 © The State of Queensland, Queensland Museum 2014 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 Print ISSN 2204-1478 Online NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum Vale Jeanette Adelaide Covacevich, AM, PSM (1945–2015) Patrick J. COUPER Vertebrate Zoology Section, Biodiversity Program, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia. Judith McKAY Historian and museum consultant; formerly on the staff of the Queensland Museum. Citation: Couper, P.J. & McKay, J. 2016. Vale Jeanette Adelaide Covacevich, AM, PSM (1945-2015). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum - Nature 59: 257–271. ISSN 2204–1478 (Online), ISSN 0079–8835 (Print). Accepted: 16 February 2016 First published online: 13 April 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1082/j.2204-1478.59.2016.2016-04 LSID - urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A7647FE-2B8D-4BD4-B8D8-422F0E61C261 Jeanette Covacevich, who died in Brisbane on 17 September 2015, was one of the Queensland Museum’s best known and longest-serving staff members.
    [Show full text]
  • The High-Level Classification of Skinks (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincomorpha)
    Zootaxa 3765 (4): 317–338 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3765.4.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:357DF033-D48E-4118-AAC9-859C3EA108A8 The high-level classification of skinks (Reptilia, Squamata, Scincomorpha) S. BLAIR HEDGES Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, 208 Mueller Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Skinks are usually grouped in a single family, Scincidae (1,579 species) representing one-quarter of all lizard species. Oth- er large lizard families, such as Gekkonidae (s.l.) and Iguanidae (s.l.), have been partitioned into multiple families in recent years, based mainly on evidence from molecular phylogenies. Subfamilies and informal suprageneric groups have been used for skinks, defined by morphological traits and supported increasingly by molecular phylogenies. Recently, a seven- family classification for skinks was proposed to replace that largely informal classification, create more manageable taxa, and faciliate systematic research on skinks. Those families are Acontidae (26 sp.), Egerniidae (58 sp.), Eugongylidae (418 sp.), Lygosomidae (52 sp.), Mabuyidae (190 sp.), Sphenomorphidae (546 sp.), and Scincidae (273 sp.). Representatives of 125 (84%) of the 154 genera of skinks are available in the public sequence databases and have been placed in molecular phylogenies that support the recognition of these families. However, two other molecular clades with species that have long been considered distinctive morphologically belong to two new families described here, Ristellidae fam. nov. (14 sp.) and Ateuchosauridae fam. nov.
    [Show full text]
  • From North-East Australia, Elevation of Carlia Pectoralis Inconnexa
    Zootaxa 3546: 1–28 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3EFDDF27-88ED-4D0B-9668-4F9BE58547CA Description of two new Carlia species (Reptilia: Scincidae) from north-east Australia, elevation of Carlia pectoralis inconnexa Ingram & Covacevich 1989 to full species status, and redescription of Carlia pectoralis (de Vis 1884) CONRAD J. HOSKIN1,3 & PATRICK J. COUPER2 1School of Marine & Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia. 2Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Bank, Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia. 3Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract Scincid lizards belonging to the genus Carlia are found in eastern and northern Australia and in New Guinea and associated islands. These skinks are a particularly diverse component of the reptile fauna of north-east Australia. Carlia pectoralis (de Vis 1884) was formerly regarded as occurring over much of eastern Queensland, in north-east Australia. Here we show that it consists of four species: Carlia pectoralis, Carlia decora sp. nov., Carlia rubigo sp. nov. and Carlia inconnexa Ingram & Covacevich 1989 (which was formerly described as a subspecies of C. pectoralis). Herein, we describe two new species, elevate C. p. inconnexa to full species status with a revised description, and redescribe C. pectoralis sensu stricto. The four species differ in aspects of scalation, morphology and colour pattern. Carlia decora sp. nov. occurs in vine thickets, rainforest margins and moist open forests in high rainfall coastal areas of mid-east and north- east Queensland. Carlia rubigo sp.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER Vol: 1/2018
    SUMMER Vol: 1/2018 Photo: Doug Gimesy FLORA AND FAUNA OF SYDNEY’S NORTH HEAD More images and information on Sydney’s hidden gem, go to page 23 Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub is a nationally and state-listed endangered scrub and heath vegetation community. The barking owl is a medium-sized owl with bright yellow eyes and no facial disc. Upper parts are brown or greyish-brown, and the white breast is vertically streaked with brown. The large talons are yellow. Grass tree (Xanthorrea spp.). An iconic part of the Australian landscape, the grass tree is widespread across eastern New South Wales. These Australian native plants have a thick fi re-blackened trunk and long spiked Smooth-barked apple (Angophora costata), also known as Sydney red leaves. They are abundant in the heath habitat at North Head. The grass gum or rusty gum trees. Growing to heights of 15−30 metres, the russet- tree grows 1 to 5 metres in height and produces striking white-fl owered coloured angophoras shed their bark in spring to reveal spectacular new spikes which grow up to 1 metre long. salmon-coloured bark. 2 Australian Wildlife Vol 1 - Summer 2018 Contents features regulars Footprints in water: In search From the President’s desk 7 of the elusive platypus 5 - Doug Gimesy Book reviews Platypus ‘Death Traps’ 30 11 - Geoff Williams Be a part of the Australian Is it too late for the koala? 7 20 34 Wildlife Society’s conservation 13 - Linda Dennis work Extinction is not an option - Membership form 17 Introducing Aussie Ark: Giving 35 hope to an entire ecosystem Black Mountain: Forbidding 20 place or refuge - Sabine Borgis Sydney’s hidden gem 23 - Suzanne Medway 13 23 The thin green line: A 27 consortium of partners and landowners enhancing a critical wildlife corridor - David Rush 17 26 Suzanne Medway AM 18 27 Editor, Australian Wildlife On the cover: Front Cover: Platypus taken at Upper Tarago River, SUMMER Vol: 1/2017 Neerim, Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • S1 Supplementary Figures
    S1 Supplementary Figures 10 loci 20 loci 40 loci 80 loci 10 8 uns r 6 4 Converged 2 0 UMCMC CMCMC-50 CMCMC-70 CMCMC-90 CMCMC-95 CMCMC-100 Figure S1: Convergence of different methods for different numbers of loci, re- stricted to the “YH" scenario. The x axis lists CMCMC samplers with different con- sensus thresholds and the y axis shows the number of replicates which converge within 72 hours. 16 taxa 32 taxa 48 taxa 10 8 runs 6 4 Converged 2 0 UMCMC CMCMC-50 CMCMC-70 CMCMC-90 CMCMC-95 CMCMC-100 Figure S2: Convergence of different methods for different numbers of taxa in the true species tree, restricted to the “YH" scenario. The x axis lists CMCMC samplers with different consensus thresholds and the y axis shows the number of replicates which converge within 72 hours. 1 10 loci 20 loci 40 loci 300 250 converge 200 to 150 100 iterations 50 Million 0 50 70 90 95 - - - - -100 UMCMC CMCMC CMCMC CMCMC CMCMC CMCMC Figure S3: Computational cost of different methods for different numbers of loci, restricted to the “YH" scenario. The computational cost is shown as the number of million iterations for the MCMC chains to converge for the chains which converged within 72 hours. 16 taxa 32 taxa 48 taxa 160 140 120 converge to 100 80 60 iterations 40 20 Million 0 -50 -70 -90 -95 -100 UMCMC CMCMC CMCMC CMCMC CMCMC CMCMC Figure S4: Computational cost of different methods for different numbers of taxa in the species tree, restricted to the “YH" scenario.
    [Show full text]