The Modern Anglo-Dutch Empire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Modern Anglo-Dutch Empire TheThe ModernModern Anglo±DutchAnglo±Dutch EmpireEmpire itsits Origins,Origins, EvolutionEvolution && OutlookOutlook by Robert D. Ingraham The Modern Anglo-Dutch Empire: its Origins, Evolution, and Anti-Human Outlook by Robert D. Ingraham Dedication & Acknowledgments This work is dedicated to my wife of 28 years, Andrea Joy Ingraham Special acknowledgments to Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., whose writings influenced almost every part of this work, and to historians, H. Graham Lowry, Anton Chaitkin, and Alan Salisbury. Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................ p. 1 Chapter 1 - The bestial view of Man: from Rome to Venice .............................. p. 7 Chapter 2 - The Venetian Empire, before and after the Council of Florence ..... p. 11 Chapter 3 - The Giovani revolution ................................................................. p. 16 Chapter 4 - Sarpi©s web .................................................................................. p. 20 Chapter 5 - Empiricism against the Renaissance ............................................ p. 25 Chapter 6 - The legal theorists of the oligarchical model ................................. p. 37 Chapter 7 - The new Venice in Amsterdam ...................................................... p. 49 Chapter 8 - Money, Speculation & Gambling ................................................... p. 55 Chapter 9 - The Anglo-Dutch Empire .............................................................. p. 61 Chapter 10 - The nature of the Beast ................................................................. p. 68 Chapter 11 - The Commonwealth in America ..................................................... p. 79 Chapter 12 - Richard Nixon©s treason: the post-1971 world ................................. p. 87 Appendix 1 ± Paolo Sarpi: Pensieri #146 ............................................................. p. 92 Appendix 2 - Excerpts from Franklin Roosevelt .................................................. p. 94 Appendix 3 - A Temple of Hope; a Beacon of Liberty............................................. p.101 * Bibliography ...................................................................................................... p.102 Index ................................................................................................................. p.107 © August, 2008, by Robert D. Ingraham On the Cover ± The Little Tower of Babel, Pieter Bruegel the Elder, Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen © "In nations which have made a false commencement, it would be found that the citizen, or rather the subject, has extorted immunity after immunity, as his growing intelligence and importance have both instructed and required him to defend those particular rights which were necessary to his well-being. A certain accumulation of these immunities constitutes... the essence of European Liberty, even at this hour. It is scarcely necessary to tell the reader that this freedom, be it more or less, depends on a principle entirely different from our own. Here the immunities do not proceed from, but they are granted to the government, being, in other words, concessions of natural rights made by the people to the state, for the benefit of social protection. So long as this vital difference exists between ourselves and other nations, it will be vain to think of finding analogies in their institutions. The mildest and justest governments in Europe are, at this moment, theoretically despotisms." James Fenimore Cooper The Bravo 1 Preface This is a book about Empire. In one sense, its main focus is on the modern manifestation of Empire, i.e., the misunderstood Anglo-Dutch System, which was born in the late 16th century, and came into maturity between 1688-1763. That empire is still very much with us today. In another sense, this book deals with the basic question of the nature of Empire itself, not any particular empire, but the ongoing oligarchical idea of Empire. Most people today think of empires as something of the past. Were that only true, the world presently would be in a much happier condition. Whether you realize it or not, the issue of Empire, and the human race's long struggle to free itself from Empire is the most critical political concern facing us today. We are currently confronted with a profound economic and strategic crisis, and defeating the current schemes of the Empire is now a matter of life or death for humanity. Much of this book is very detailed, with names and places that may not be familiar to many. I urge you to be patient, and to work your way through the material. The sections on Rome, Salamanca, John Locke, Empiricism, and banking may seem tedious, but hopefully, when you are finished, you will understand that Empire is the mortal enemy of humanity, and that the historical mission of the United States is to eliminate that enemy once and for all. * * * * * Virtually all modern academically-approved histories are incompetent. That statement will probably provoke some PhD recipients to dismiss the following work out of hand, but there are two legitimate reasons for making such a claim. The first reason is the pervasive failure of accredited American, as well as European, historians to appreciate the profound importance of the American Revolution, and the axiomatic species-difference between the American constitutional republic and the British Empire, a difference which persists down to the present day. The evidence of this failure is perhaps most glaring in the almost universal inability, or unwillingness, to distinguish between the American methods of national banking and the constitutional issuance of currency, contrary to the European system of private central banking. The second failure of modern historians is the almost universal contamination of historical analysis with a mechanistic-fatalist approach. This latter flaw is particularly obvious with Marxist, as well as various neo/pseudo-Marxist types, but the same condemnation can be made of the Chicago and Vienna schools© incompetent view of impersonal ªmarket forces.º Philosophically, the followers of both Marx and Von Hayek, as well as their many and varied derivatives, are identical in their empirical-mechanistic methodology. In truth, the subject of history is Man, yet the university libraries are satiated with history books, which evade the most basic obvious question: What is man©s nature which sets him apart from the lower beasts, allows him to create both science and great symphonies, and to increase his mastery over the planet? Or to put it more plainly, what is it about man that allows him to even hypothesize about human history, since monkeys, donkeys and whales have no such capability? How can anyone write a competent history of mankind, without even addressing that question? How does one understand Man©s history, and the long periods of progress, and retrogression which have characterized it, unless one starts with the fundamental question: What does it mean to be human? The literary journals are full of articles, written by university professors who write like bad-imitation Joe Fridays: ªJust the Facts.º But in reality, such factuality produces lies, because of what it leaves out. This problem has become much worse with the advent of the so-called ªinformation society,º a false reality in which real history is butchered by the ªfact-checkersº of Wikipedia, and their ilk. This book does not pretend to be a ªhistory of the human race from beginning to end,º nor does it 2 make any claims of profundity in the realms of science or philosophy, but, if we return to the question, ªWhat is it in Man©s nature which sets him apart from the lower beasts?,º as we work our way through the history and nature of the Anglo-Dutch Empire, hopefully some glimmers of understanding will come forth. The subject of this work is the millenia-long struggle of the human race to free itself from Empire: to free itself politically, economically, culturally, and morally. Not from any particular empire, such as the Ottomans or the Persians, but from the continuing ontological reality of an ongoing oligarchical idea of Empire, the which, continues to infest this world in our 21st century. The specific focus at hand is the modern Anglo-Dutch System of empire, because that is the one we are currently threatened by. The majority of this writing will concentrate on how this monstrosity came into existence and consolidated its power. Hence the years from 1582 to 1763 will require most of our attention. However, the rise of Venetian power after 1100, as well as the 19th and 20th centuries© British targeting of the American Republic, will also be examined, but not with the same depth of historical detail. The specific structures of the Anglo-Dutch System have evolved over time, but the axiomatic nature of the modern oligarchical empire was complete by 1763. My purpose here is to report on the origins of that Anglo-Dutch System, and to provide insight into its evil nature. Human voluntarism All of recorded human history encompasses a centuries-long fight between those who view man as a noble creature, as Genesis says: ªmade in the Creator©s image,º versus the oligarchic view of man as a beast, expendable, a ªworthless wretch.º All human progress has emanated from champions of the first view; empires result from proponents of the second view. To be clear, this is not a connect-the- dots conspiracy theory of history; this is a question of axiomatic views as to the
Recommended publications
  • Executive Intelligence Review, Volume 31, Number 47, December
    EIR Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Muriel Mirak-Weissbach, Antony Papert, Gerald From the Associate Editor Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, William Wertz Editor: Nancy Spannaus Associate Editors: Ronald Kokinda, Susan Welsh yndon LaRouche’s new flanking attack against George Shultz’s Managing Editor: John Sigerson L Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht fascist “Vulcans”—the controllers of President Bush—begins in this Technology Editor: Marsha Freeman issue, with LaRouche’s review of the explosive new book Confes- Book Editor: Katherine Notley Photo Editor: Stuart Lewis sions of an Economic Hit Man, by John Perkins. Perkins knows from Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol the inside a good bit about some of the crimes that have been commit- INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS: ted against Third World nations by Shultz’s crowd. But he also makes Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, Michele Steinberg some important blunders, because he lacks the strategic-historical Economics: Marcia Merry Baker, overview, and competence in economics, which LaRouche provides. Lothar Komp History: Anton Chaitkin LaRouche has been at war with these Economic Hit Men—or Ibero-America: Dennis Small EHMs, as Perkins dubs them—for more than 30 years, as we docu- Law: Edward Spannaus Russia and Eastern Europe: ment in this issue (see “ ‘Hit Men’ vs. LaRouche’s Fusion Energy Rachel Douglas Foundation,” page 17), and as we shall report in further detail next United States: Debra Freeman week. It is they, and their controllers such as George Shultz, who INTERNATIONAL BUREAUS: Bogota´: Javier Almario railroaded LaRouche to prison for five years on trumped-up charges, Berlin: Rainer Apel because he represents the most potent intellectual force opposing Caracas: David Ramonet Copenhagen: Poul Rasmussen their vicious destruction of the nation-state.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Unesco Jahr Von Marko Antun De Dominis
    IDSTEIN 29.09.2010 Idsteiner Mittwochsgesellscaft Ausländerbeirat der Stadt Idstein Kroatische Kulturgemeinschaft Wiesbaden e. V. 2010 UNESCO JAHR VON MARKO ANTUN DE DOMINIS 450-Jahrestag der Geburt von Marko Antun de Dominis, Philosoph und Wissenschaftler (ܐ1560 -†1624) Marko Antun de Dominis spielte in der intellektuellen Welt an der Wende vom 16. Jh. zum 17. Jh. eine wichtige Rolle auf dem Gebiet der Naturwissenschaften und Theologie. Er war Bischof von Senj und später Erzbischof von Split. Sein Amt bestimmte der Konflikt zwischen zwei Interpretationen des Christentums und der Lehre von Christus, was mit der Frage der Kirchenorganisation und nicht seltenen dem Missbrauch der Kirchenherrschaft und eben der Päpste verbunden war. Er versuchte einen Weg zu finden, um die zukünftige europäische Religionstrennung und Konflikte wie z.B. den Dreißigjährigen Krieg zu verhindern. Wenn man nur diesen Aspekt in Betracht zieht, kommt man zur Erkenntnis der Größe einer solchen Persönlichkeit. Marko Antun de Dominis (1560 -1624) war auch ein der Pioniere in der Physikforschungen, auf dem Gebiet der Optik und der Lichtbrechung. Auf diesem Gebiet veröffentlichte er im Jahr 1611 unter dem Titel: “Tractatus de radiis visus et lucis, perspectivis et iride” eine epochale Wissenschaftsarbeit, die einen großen Einfluss auf die zukünftige Forschungen der Optik hatte. Diese Wissenschaftsarbeit wurde später von Isaac Newton gepriesen und auch zitiert. Aber uns interessieren die historischen und theologischen Fragen im Rahmen des Dialogs zwischen Katholizismus und Protestantismus, denn die Hauptcharakteristik Europas an der Wende vom 16. zum 17. Jh. war die Religionstrennung zwischen dem europäischen katholischen Süden und dem protestantischen Norden. Marco Antonio de Dominis alias Jesuitenseminar in Padua ging Marco jedoch auf seiner Arbeit in Padua.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Episcopate
    THE HISTORIC EPISCOPATE By ROBERT ELLIS THOMPSON, M.A., S.T. D., LL.D. of THE PRESBYTERY of PHILADELPHIA PHILADELPHIA tEfce Wtstminmx pre** 1910 "3^70 Copyright, 1910, by The Trustees of The Presbyterian Board of Publication and Sabbath School Work Published May, 1910 <§;G!.A265282 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACADEMIC USAGE THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO THE PRESIDENT, FACULTY AND TRUSTEES OF MUHLENBERG COLLEGE IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF HONORS CONFERRED PREFACE The subject of this book has engaged its author's attention at intervals for nearly half a century. The present time seems propitious for publishing it, in the hope of an irenic rather than a polemic effect. Our Lord seems to be pressing on the minds of his people the duty of reconciliation with each other as brethren, and to be bringing about a harmony of feeling and of action, which is beyond our hopes. He is beating down high pretensions and sectarian prejudices, which have stood in the way of Christian reunion. It is in the belief that the claims made for what is called "the Historic Episcopate" have been, as Dr. Liddon admits, a chief obstacle to Christian unity, that I have undertaken to present the results of a long study of its history, in the hope that this will promote, not dissension, but harmony. If in any place I have spoken in what seems a polemic tone, let this be set down to the stress of discussion, and not to any lack of charity or respect for what was for centuries the church of my fathers, as it still is that of most of my kindred.
    [Show full text]
  • Universalist Aspirations of the Utraquist Church
    194 Zdeněk V. David Universalist Aspirations of the Utraquist Church Zdeněk V. David (Washington, D.C.) An important legacy of Utraquism to the subsequent Czech political culture was its universalist outlook. This conclusion may appear paradoxical consider - ing that the national accent seemed so strong in the Bohemian Reformation and especially during the Bohemian religious wars. Such an assumption of national exclusivity led to the mistaken view that the Bohemians might be sat - isfied with an exceptional ecclesiastical status, as Rome saw it at the Council of Basel in 1434-1436 and in the issuance of a special privilege of the lay chalice for the Bohemians by Pope Pius IV in 1564. These tactics of appeasement, however, failed. They ignored the basic fact that the Bohemians’ goal was to reform the (Western) Church as a whole. In the eyes of the Utraquists, the purpose of the Czech nation was not to assert a peculiar set of ethnically grounded beliefs, but to serve as a vehicle for the realisation of a universal purpose. Subsequently, this outlook harmonised with the cosmopolitan character of the Enlighten - ment and eventually with that of political liberalism. In an earlier article, I discussed the Utraquist legacy of liberal ecclesiology. 1 In this paper the Utraquists’ universalism is treated in terms of their contin - ued, albeit qualified, attachment to the Roman Church, as well as their rela - tionship to other groups that sought to reform the entire scope of Western Christendom along the lines of liberal Catholicism. 2 This essay also seeks to answer the charges that the Utraquists’ ambition to reform the Church of Rome revealed signs of sycophancy, quixotic idiosyncrasy, and megalomania in their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • The American System Vs. British Treason
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 26, Number 17, April 23, 1999 between American policies and BAC policies. The British- orchestrated attempt to oust President Clinton from office in an illegal, unconstitutional coup d’e´tat, failed to install Al Gore into the Oval Office, but the President’s survival came The American System at a dear price. U.S.A. should join the ‘Survivors’ Club’ vs. British treason The last best hope for the world to avoid war and further by Anton Chaitkin financial and economic catastrophe, is for a rejuvenated Presi- dent Clinton, supported by anti-BAC forces in the United States and around the globe, to take the lead in crushing Lon- The American republic’s unique, pro-human economic and don and its lackeys, including those penetrated into his own social character was born in the Revolution and shaped over administration and both political parties’ Congressional cau- time by such revolutionary economic nationalists as Benja- cuses. min Franklin, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, As LaRouche noted in The Road to Recovery, the post- Henry Carey, Henry Clay, Abraham Lincoln and, later, October 1998 actions of the BAC—the hyperinflationary Franklin D. Roosevelt. The British assassination of President binge, and the war drives in the Persian Gulf and the Bal- John F. Kennedy preempted his efforts to revive the tradition; kans—have driven leading Eurasian nations, led by China, and President William Jefferson Clinton has, on occasion, Russia, and India, to form a “Survivors’ Club” of nations, shown an “FDR impulse” to revive this essential American opposed to the lunacy coming out of nearly all Western cap- republican outlook and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editors
    EIR Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Muriel Mirak-Weissbach, Antony Papert, Gerald From the Editors Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, William Wertz Editor: Nancy Spannaus Associate Editors: Ronald Kokinda, Susan Welsh ur Feature, on the 20-year history of the Schiller Institute, Managing Editor: John Sigerson O Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht founded by Helga Zepp-LaRouche in 1984, will be most especially Technology Editor: Marsha Freeman instructive to the young people who are now joining the LaRouche Special Projects: Mark Burdman Book Editor: Katherine Notley movement, fascinated by the high plane of ideas upon which the Photo Editor: Stuart Lewis LaRouches operate—by contrast with the pervasive banality of the Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol culture around us. Most of these youth were not yet born, when the INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS: dramatic events of the early 1980s, described by Mrs. LaRouche in Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, Michele Steinberg her article on page 6, were unfolding. Through her personal story of Economics: Marcia Merry Baker, Lothar Komp why she founded the organization; the excerpts we publish of her History: Anton Chaitkin speech to the Institute’s founding conference; and a timeline of the Ibero-America: Dennis Small Law: Edward Spannaus Institute’s activities, the reader will be amazed at the depth and Russia and Eastern Europe: breadth, the international scope and beauty, of the work that has been Rachel Douglas United States: Debra Freeman done, and is still being done. Always, Mrs. LaRouche has stressed INTERNATIONAL BUREAUS: that without beauty, as Schiller understood it, there can be no solution Bogota´: Javier Almario to the political-economic crises that are now upon us.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Calixtus and the Humanist Tradition
    Georg Calixtus and the Humanist Tradition Christian Thorsten Callisen Diploma of Financial Services (Financial Planning) Finsia Postgraduate Certificate in Business USQ Research Students Centre Division of Research & Commercialisation Queensland University of Technology Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) 2010 i Keywords Georg Calixtus (1586–1656); Isaac Casaubon (1559–1614); humanism; ars historica; consensus antiquitatis; calixtine theology; irenicism; Renaissance; history of ideas; early modern Europe ii Abstract Georg Calixtus (1586–1656) was a Lutheran theologian, prominent in the German lands during the first half of the seventeenth century. Existing research focuses on Calixtus‘ contributions to religious and theological debates, particularly in regard to his role in the Syncretistic Controversy of the latter half of the seventeenth century, and in regard to his unique position as a Lutheran who aspired to reunion between the different Christian confessions. This thesis problematises this focus on Calixtus by theologians and ecclesiastical historians, and argues that the genesis and transmission of his ideas cannot be fully appreciated without considering his relationship with the broader intellectual milieu of early modern Europe. It does this by exploring Calixtus‘ interaction with the humanist tradition, in particular by reconsidering his relationship with Isaac Casaubon (1559–1614), and by exploring his work in light of intellectual movements that were taking place outside the Christian church. In so doing, this thesis argues that Calixtus made contributions to early modern thought that have been overlooked in the existing literature. It also becomes apparent that much research remains to be done to gain a more accurate picture of his place in the early modern intellectual landscape, and of his legacy to later generations of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Competence, Anatomy and the Polity in Seventeenth-Century Rome
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Renaissance Studies Vol. 21 No. 4 BlackwellOxford,RESTRenaissance0269-1213©XXXOriginalMedicine 2007 TheUKArticles in Publishing seventeenth-century Author Studies Journal Ltd compilation Rome © 2007 The Society for Renaissance Studies, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Silvia De Renzi Medical competence, anatomy and the polity in seventeenth-century Rome Silvia De Renzi In April 1624, while walking in the Vatican gardens, Pope Urban VIII was entertained by a small group discussing the latest startling natural phenom- enon, a two-headed calf. With the pontiff were his secretary, his theologian and two physicians, Johannes Faber and Giulio Mancini. A few days before, Faber had received the calf from the Cardinal Nephew and, having dissected it in front of students at his home, now presented his drawings to the pope.1 Five months later, by papal order, Mancini called Faber to attend the autopsy of Marco Antonio De Dominis. One of the tragic figures of the Counter- Reformation, De Dominis had died in jail after controversially recanting his heretical views. Rumours of poisoning soon circulated and an autopsy was ordered, but the doctors judged it a natural death.2 These episodes tend to appear in unrelated historical accounts. De Dominis’ demise, including the subsequent burning of his corpse, has been explored by religious historians discussing ill-fated instances of reform in the Catholic Church.3 Historian of science Paula Findlen has analysed the con- versation on the two-headed calf as an example of how, by becoming courtly displays, natural investigations gained unprecedented importance in the early modern period.4 In neither account has the presence of physicians been remarked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Englishmen Studies in the History of Political Thought
    The Making of Englishmen Studies in the History of Political Thought Edited by Terence Ball, Arizona State University JÖrn Leonhard, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Wyger Velema, University of Amsterdam Advisory Board Janet Coleman, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK Vittor Ivo Comparato, University of Perugia, Italy Jacques Guilhaumou, CNRS, France John Marshall, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA Markku Peltonen, University of Helsinki, Finland VOLUME 8 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship The Making of Englishmen Debates on National Identity 1550–1650 By Hilary Larkin LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www. knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Titian (c1545) Portrait of a Young Man (The Young Englishman). Galleria Palatina (Palazzo Pitti), Florence, Italy. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larkin, Hilary. The making of Englishmen : debates on national identity, 1550-1650 / by Hilary Larkin.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1. East-West Gateway on the Silk Road Part 2. the Arc of Crisis Part 3
    A special report from the Australian Alert Service If the reader has heard of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in China, it is likely through lurid news media head- lines about the alleged abuse and enslavement of its Uyghur ethnic inhabitants. The November 2020 – March 2021 Aus- tralian Alert Service series of eight articles assembled here, with an appendix of related material from the AAS, demys- tifies what is going on in and around Xinjiang, and why. We expose the Anglo-American fostering of terrorism in Xinjiang and sponsorship of “East Turkistan” separatism. Part 1. East-West gateway on the Silk Road The ancient Silk Road crossed the mountains and deserts of the The Great Game and area of central Eurasia that is today’s Xinjiang Region in China. Mackinder’s ‘Heartland’ In the 19th century, the doctrine of geopolitics arose from the From Silk Road to Land-Bridge British Empire’s “Great Game” struggle to dominate this region and keep Russia from approaching India. Sun Yat-sen, the The new Great Game father of modern China, envisioned a better future through The Xinjiang fulcrum railway development, an outlook incoporated into President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative today. Part 2. The Arc of Crisis Bernard Lewis and Zbigniew American National Security Advisors Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski revived geopolitics as policy in Brzezinski the 1970s, while the mastermind of an Arc of Crisis in Geopolitics for the Cold War Eurasia was the Anglo-American orientologist Bernard Operation Cyclone – Afghan Lewis, also known as godfather of the neocons. Brze- Mujaheddin zinski wanted to destabilise the Soviet Union even at the risk of nuclear war, by backing Islamist guerrillas to strike at its “soft under- ‘He who sows the wind…’ belly” in Central Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Larouche in India: Build the Four-Power Alliance Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H
    Executive Intelligence Review EIRDecember 19, 2008 Vol. 35 No. 49 www.larouchepub.com $10.00 The Truth of Bretton Woods Lies Within Physical Science Dynamics of Terrorism: The Gravest Moment of Crisis Stop Anglo-Saudi Terror Apparatus Behind Mumbai Attacks LaRouche in India: Build The Four-Power Alliance Founder and Contributing Editor: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. Editorial Board: Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Antony Papert, Gerald Rose, Dennis Small, Edward Spannaus, Nancy Spannaus, Jeffrey Steinberg, EI R William Wertz Editor: Nancy Spannaus Managing Editor: Susan Welsh Assistant Managing Editor: Bonnie James Science Editor: Marjorie Mazel Hecht From the Managing Editor Technology Editor: Marsha Freeman Book Editor: Katherine Notley Photo Editor: Stuart Lewis Circulation Manager: Stanley Ezrol It is quite a sign of the times, that Lyndon and Helga LaRouche’s sched- INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORS uled visit to India occurred just days after that nation’s largest city, Counterintelligence: Jeffrey Steinberg, Michele Mumbai, was shaken by a terrorist attack which some are describing as Steinberg Economics: Marcia Merry Baker, Paul Gallagher “India’s 9/11.” We can imagine how livid the terrorists’ British string- History: Anton Chaitkin Ibero-America: Dennis Small pullers were, when they learned that the LaRouches had surfaced in Law: Edward Spannaus India just at that moment, denouncing the British hand behind the Russia and Eastern Europe: Rachel Douglas Mumbai killers, and organizing Indian support for a Four-Power alli- United States: Debra Freeman ance to defeat the British imperialist oligarchy! INTERNATIONAL BUREAUS We highlight in this issue speeches given by the LaRouches and Bogotá: Javier Almario Berlin: Rainer Apel EIR’s Jeffrey Steinberg at the Forum for Strategic Security Studies in Copenhagen: Tom Gillesberg New Delhi on Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRIAL of GALILEO-REVISITED Dr
    THE TRIAL OF GALILEO-REVISITED Dr. George DeRise Professor Emeritus, Mathematics Thomas Nelson Community College FALL 2018 Mon 1:30 PM- 3:30 PM, 6 sessions 10/22/2018 - 12/3/2018 (Class skip date 11/19) Sadler Center, Commonwealth Auditorium Christopher Wren Association BOOKS: THE TRIAL OF GALILEO, 1612-1633: Thomas F. Mayer. (Required) THE CASE FOR GALILEO- A CLOSED QUESTION? Fantoli, Annibale. GALILEO; THE RISE AND FALL OF A TROUBLESOME GENIUS. Shea, William; Artigas, Mariano. BASIC ONLINE SOURCES: Just Google: “Galileo” and “Galileo Affair” (WIKI) “Galileo Project” and “Trial of Galileo-Famous Trials” YOUTUBE MOVIES: Just Google: “GALILEO'S BATTLE FOR THE HEAVENS – NOVA – YOUTUBE” “GREAT BOOKS, GALILEO’S DIALOGUE – YOUTUBE” HANDOUTS: GLOSSARY CAST OF CHARACTERS BLUE DOCUMENTS GALILEO GALILEI: b. 1564 in Pisa, Italy Astronomer, Physicist, Mathematician Professor of Mathematics, Universities of Pisa and Padua. In 1610 he observed the heavens with the newly invented telescope- mountains and craters of the moon, moons of Jupiter, many stars never seen before; later the phases of Venus; sunspots. These observations supported his belief that the Copernican (Heliocentric) system was correct, i.e. that the Sun was the center of the Universe; the planets including earth revolved around it. This was in direct contrast to the Ptolemaic-Aristotelian (Geocentric) System which was 1500 years old at the time. Galileo’s Copernican view was also in conflict with the Christian interpretation of Holy Scripture. Because of the Counter Reformation Catholic theologians took a literal interpretation of the Bible. Galileo was investigated by the Inquisition in 1615 and warned not to defend the Copernican view.
    [Show full text]