DOCSLIB.ORG

Annotation of Functional Variation Within Non-MHC MS Susceptibility Loci Through Bioinformatics Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annotation of Functional Variation Within Non-MHC MS Susceptibility Loci Through Bioinformatics Analysis Genes and Immunity (2014) 15, 466–476 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1466-4879/14 www.nature.com/gene ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annotation of functional variation within non-MHC MS susceptibility loci through bioinformatics analysis FBS Briggs, LJ Leung and LF Barcellos There is a strong and complex genetic component to multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition to variation in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region on chromosome 6p21.3, 110 non-MHC susceptibility variants have been identified in Northern Europeans, thus far. The majority of the MS-associated genes are immune related; however, similar to most other complex genetic diseases, the causal variants and biological processes underlying pathogenesis remain largely unknown. We created a comprehensive catalog of putative functional variants that reside within linkage disequilibrium regions of the MS-associated genic variants to guide future studies. Bioinformatics analyses were also conducted using publicly available resources to identify plausible pathological processes relevant to MS and functional hypotheses for established MS-associated variants. Genes and Immunity (2014) 15, 466–476; doi:10.1038/gene.2014.37; published online 17 July 2014 INTRODUCTION protein structure through alternative splicing within IL7R7 and 8 Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a clinically heterogeneous autoimmune TNFRSF1A. However, the causal variants and the pathological disease of the central nervous system with a complex etiology, biological processes mediated by the remaining 103 loci have not primarily characterized by demyelination and the formation of been fully explored. neurological lesions.1 The prevalence of MS is greatest among Here, we present a comprehensive catalog of candidate Northern Europeans (0.1–0.2%).1 There is a prominent genetic functional variants within linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks component illustrated by consistently higher disease concordance encompassing the non-MHC MS susceptibility loci to expedite in monozygotic twins compared with dizygotic twins across the prioritization of SNPs for future fine-mapping analyses. We several populations (30% and 5%, respectively), similar to other also conducted several bioinformatics enrichment analyses that 2 autoimmune diseases. The relative recurrence risk (ls)isB6.3 integrated multiple functional (-omic) data for both MS-associated among siblings.3 For several decades, variation within the major genes and the individual non-MHC risk variants. These results histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6p21.3 has provide thorough insight into underlying disease mechanisms in been known to confer the strongest genetic risk for MS. The MS based on current knowledge. primary susceptibility locus is a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II allele, HLA-DRB1*15:01.1,4,5 Recent fine-mapping of the MHC demonstrated the presence of at least 10 additional RESULTS independent HLA and non-HLA risk alleles for MS.6 Of the 110 non-MHC MS risk variants, 63 SNPs are within genes, Full characterization of the non-MHC genetic component in MS 1 SNP is within a noncoding RNA (PVT1) and the remaining 46 has been challenging; however, 110 non-MHC risk variants have SNPs are intergenic (Table 1). Using Haploreg v2 (2013.02.14; been identified within the last decade through both genome-wide http://www.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php)9 association studies (GWASs) and follow-up candidate gene studies features of the genic risk SNPs were assessed. Among the genic facilitated by international research initiatives (International risk SNPs, there were three missense SNPs (TYK2, SLC44A2 and Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium and collaborative con- IFI30), two 30 untranslated region (UTR) SNPs (EVI5 and CD69), one 4,5 0 struction of the ImmunoChip). These variants explain 20% of ls, 5 UTR SNP (CD86), one synonymous SNP (TIMMDC1) and one and with the inclusion of the four most prominent HLA risk alleles downstream SNP (EOMES); the remaining 45 SNPs are intronic 5 as much as 28% of ls. These risk variants are both genic (Table 1). With the exception of the TYK2 missense variant, these (63 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 63 genes) and variants are fairly common with minor allele frequencies 45%. intergenic, similar to most complex diseases. For most of the 63 A total of 92 SNPs reside within regulatory motifs, and 27 SNPs MS-associated genes, their contribution to pathogenesis is reside within transcription factor binding sites. Interestingly, the unclear; however, they appear to be primarily involved in MS risk variant rs4796791 is an intronic STAT3 (a transcription immune response. In the largest MS association study, high- factor) SNP, and three other MS risk variants exist within signal resolution mapping was performed for 8 risk loci; for 5 of them, transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) binding sites TNFSF14, IL2RA, TNFRSF1A, IL12A and STAT4, 50% of the posterior within their respective genes/noncoding RNA: rs4410871 (PVT1), probability of association was explained by an intronic variant; 3 of rs917116 (JAZF1) and rs2236262 (ZFP36L1). Among all variants, the 5 variants are associated with protein levels.5 Functional there was a significant enrichment of strong enhancers for several experiments have revealed the primary causal variants affecting cell lines, including human embryonic stem cells and leukemia Genetic Epidemiology and Genomics Laboratory, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Correspondence: Profesor LF Barcellos, Genetic Epidemiology and Genomics Laboratory, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, 324 Stanley Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Received 20 February 2014; revised 2 May 2014; accepted 29 May 2014; published online 17 July 2014 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited Table 1. Annotation for the 110 non-MHC MS risk SNPs Chr Base pair SNP ID Ref Alt EUR Published odds Proteins bound Motifs changed Gene Gene location allele allele freq ratio (95% CI)a (transcription factor location binding site) 1 2525665 rs3748817 T C 0.33 1.14 (1.10–1.18) ZNF263 GR, p300 MMEL1 Intronic 1 6530189 rs3007421 G A 0.11 1.12 (1.07–1.18) ERa-a, Nkx2, RAR PLEKHG5 Intronic 1 85746993 rs12087340 C T 0.08 1.22 (1.15–1.29) 4.4 kb 5’ of BCL10 1 85915183 rs11587876 T C 0.21 1.12 (1.07–1.17) P300 DDAH1 Intronic 1 92975464 rs41286801 C T 0.17 1.20 (1.15–1.25) Arid5a, CEBPA, CEBPB, CTCF, EVI5 3’-UTR Pou2f2, STAT 1 101240893 rs7552544 T C 0.44 1.08 (1.05–1.12) Pax-4, Zbtb3 36 kb 3’ of VCAM1 1 101407519 rs11581062 A G 0.29 1.05 (1.01–1.09) SEF-1, YY1 SLC30A7 Intronic 1 117080166 rs6677309 A C 0.14 1.34 (1.27–1.41) POL24H8, AP2ALPHA, Mtf1, Rad21 CD58 Intronic AP2GAMMA, E2F6, CMYC 1 120258970 rs666930 T C 0.54 1.09 (1.06–1.13) EBF, Pou1f1 PHGDH Intronic 1 157770241 rs2050568 C T 0.47 1.08 (1.05–1.12) FCRL1 Intronic 1 160711804 rs35967351 A T 0.3 1.09 (1.05–1.13) GATA2 ATF3, CCNT2, INSM1, SP1, ZBTB33 SLAMF7 Intronic 1 192541472 rs1359062 C G 0.81 1.18 (1.13–1.23) 3.4 kb 5’ of RGS1 1 200874728 rs55838263 A G 0.26 1.12 (1.08–1.17) FOXA1, HNF4G, RXRA, Ik-2, NF-AT1, Pou2f2 C1orf106 Intronic TCF4 2 25017860 rs4665719 C T 0.75 1.09 (1.05–1.13) CENPO Intronic 2 43361256 rs2163226 T C 0.27 1.10 (1.07–1.15) CMYC Irf, Nanog, Spz1 88 kb 3’ of ZFP36L2 2 61095245 rs842639 G A 0.68 1.11 (1.08–1.15) PU1, YY1, ELF1 FLJ16341 Intronic 2 68587477 rs7595717 C T 0.28 1.10 (1.06–1.14) 4.8 kb 5’ of PLEK 2 112665201 rs17174870 C T 0.29 1.03 (1.00–1.07) Maf MERTK Intronic 2 191974435 rs9967792 T C 0.66 1.11 (1.07–1.15) TCF12 STAT4 Intronic 2 231115454 rs9989735 G C 0.18 1.17 (1.12–1.22) POL24H8 AP-1, CAC-binding-protein, CCNT2, SP140 Intronic FBS Briggs A role for T-cell dysregulation in MS pathogenesis E2F, EWSR1-FLI1, Egr-1, MAZ, MAZR, MZF1::1-4, Myc, PU.1, Pou2f2, SP1, STAT, Sp4, TATA, TFII-I, WT1, ZNF263, Zfp281 et al 3 18785585 rs11719975 G C 0.25 1.09 (1.05–1.13) 305 kb 5’ of SATB1 3 27757018 rs2371108 G T 0.4 1.08 (1.05–1.12) Zic 866 bp 3’ of EOMES Downstream 3 28078571 rs1813375 G T 0.49 1.15 (1.12–1.19) EBF1 CCNT2, Cdx, Foxc1, Foxj1, GATA, 205 kb 5’ of CMC1 Nkx3, Sox, TAL1 3 33013483 rs4679081 T C 0.54 1.08 (1.04–1.11) CEBPG, DMRT7, Evi-1, Foxo, HNF1, 17 kb 3’ of CCR4 Hoxa9, Hoxc10, Hoxc9, Irf, Mef2 3 71530346 rs9828629 C T 0.41 1.08 (1.05–1.12) CEBPB, HMG-IY, Myc, Zfp187 FOXP1 Intronic 3 105558837 rs2028597 G A 0.08 1.04 (0.98–1.11) AIRE, AP-4, LBP-1 CBLB Intronic 3 119222456 rs1131265 G C 0.16 1.19 (1.14–1.24) TIMMDC1 Synonymous Genes and Immunity (2014) 466 – 476 3 121543577 rs1920296 A C 0.61 1.14 (1.11–1.18) FAC1, GR IQCB1 Intronic 3 121770539 rs2255214 G T 0.51 1.11 (1.08–1.15) BRCA1, Foxi1, Pou2f2, Pou3f3, TEF 3.7 kb 5’ of CD86 3 121796768 rs9282641 G A 0.09 1.12 (1.05–1.19) NF-kB, POL2, POL24H8, CD86 5’-UTR PU1 3 159691112 rs1014486 T C 0.47 1.11 (1.07–1.14) T3R 16 kb 5’ of IL12A 4 103551603 rs7665090 A G 0.49 1.08 (1.05–1.12) Pou1f1 1 kb 3’ of MANBA 4 106173199 rs2726518 A C 0.6 1.09 (1.05–1.13) PPAR, RAR TET2 Intronic 5 35879156 rs6881706 G T 0.28 1.12 (1.08–1.16) Barhl1, Barx1, Barx2, En-1, Gbx1, 2.2 kb 3’ of IL7R Gbx2, Hlxb9, Ik-1, Ik-2, Isl2, Lhx4, Lhx8, Msx-1, Msx2, Pax-6, Pax7, Phox2a, Pou3f2, Prrx1, Prrx2 5 40399096 rs6880778 A G 0.58 1.10 (1.06–1.14) AP-1, Elf5, HMG-IY, Maf, STAT 281 kb 5’ of PTGER4 5 55440730 rs71624119 G A 0.25 1.12 (1.08–1.17) Bbx, DMRT1, STAT ANKRD55 Intronic 5 133446575 rs756699 C T 0.85 1.12 (1.07–1.18) PLZF, Pax-5 3.8 kb 5’ of TCF7 5 141506564 NA T G 0.61 1.07 (1.04–1.11) NDFIP1 Intronic 5 158759900 rs2546890 A G 0.5 1.06 (1.02–1.09) EBF1, MEF2A, PU1 Ik-2, RBP-Jk LOC285626 Intronic 467 468 Genes and Immunity (2014) 466 – 476 Table 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hypoxia and Hormone-Mediated Pathways Converge at the Histone Demethylase KDM4B in Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Hypoxia and Hormone-Mediated Pathways Converge at the Histone Demethylase KDM4B in Cancer Jun Yang 1,* ID , Adrian L. Harris 2 and Andrew M. Davidoff 1 1 Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; [email protected] 2 Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Department of Oncology, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 December 2017; Accepted: 9 January 2018; Published: 13 January 2018 Abstract: Hormones play an important role in pathophysiology. The hormone receptors, such as estrogen receptor alpha and androgen receptor in breast cancer and prostate cancer, are critical to cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth. In this review we focused on the cross-talk between hormone and hypoxia pathways, particularly in breast cancer. We delineated a novel signaling pathway from estrogen receptor to hypoxia-inducible factor 1, and discussed the role of this pathway in endocrine therapy resistance. Further, we discussed the estrogen and hypoxia pathways converging at histone demethylase KDM4B, an important epigenetic modifier in cancer. Keywords: estrogen receptor alpha; hypoxia-inducible factor 1; KDM4B; endocrine therapy resistance 1. Introduction A solid tumor is a heterogeneous mass that is comprised of not only genetically and epigenetically distinct clones, but also of areas with varying degree of hypoxia that result from rapid cancer cell proliferation that outgrows its blood supply. To survive in hostile hypoxic environments, cancer cells decelerate their proliferation rate, alter metabolism and cellular pH, and induce angiogenesis [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The P63 Target HBP-1 Is Required for Keratinocyte Differentiation and Stratification
    The p63 target HBP-1 is required for keratinocyte differentiation and stratification. Roberto Mantovani, Serena Borrelli, Eleonora Candi, Diletta Dolfini, Olì Maria Victoria Grober, Alessandro Weisz, Gennaro Melino, Alessandra Viganò, Bing Hu, Gian Paolo Dotto To cite this version: Roberto Mantovani, Serena Borrelli, Eleonora Candi, Diletta Dolfini, Olì Maria Victoria Grober, et al.. The p63 target HBP-1 is required for keratinocyte differentiation and stratification.. Cell Death and Differentiation, Nature Publishing Group, 2010, 10.1038/cdd.2010.59. hal-00542927 HAL Id: hal-00542927 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00542927 Submitted on 4 Dec 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Running title: HBP1 in skin differentiation. The p63 target HBP-1 is required for skin differentiation and stratification. Serena Borrelli1, Eleonora Candi2, Bing Hu3, Diletta Dolfini1, Maria Ravo4, Olì Maria Victoria Grober4, Alessandro Weisz4,5, GianPaolo Dotto3, Gerry Melino2,6, Maria Alessandra Viganò1 and Roberto Mantovani1*. 1) Dipartimento di Scienze Biomolecolari e Biotecnologie. Università degli Studi di Milano. Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy. 2) Biochemistry IDI-IRCCS laboratory, c/o University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Roma, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tumor Mutation Burden and JARID2 Gene Alteration Are Associated with Short Disease-Free Survival in Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    1052 Original Article Page 1 of 13 Tumor mutation burden and JARID2 gene alteration are associated with short disease-free survival in locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer Xiangmei Zhang1#^, Jingping Li2#, Qing Yang1, Yanfang Wang3, Xinhui Li1, Yunjiang Liu2, Baoen Shan1 1Research Center, 2Breast Cancer Center, 3Medical Center, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China Contributions: (I) Conception and design: Y Liu, B Shan; (II) Administrative support: X Zhang, J Li; (III) Provision of study materials: X Zhang, J Li; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Y Wang, Q Yang, X Li; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: X Zhang, J Li, Y Liu, B Shan; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. #These authors have contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Yunjiang Liu. Breast Cancer Center, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. Email: [email protected]; Baoen Shan. Research Center, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. Email: [email protected]. Background: In locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), patients who did not achieve pathologic complete response (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy develop rapid tumor metastasis. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a potential biomarker of cancer therapy, though whether it is applicable to TNBC is still unclear. Methods: A total of 14 non-pCR TNBC patients were enrolled, and tissue samples from radical operation were collected. Of these, 7 cases developed disease progression within 12 months after operation [short disease-free survival (short DFS)], while others showed longer DFS over 1 year (long DFS). Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis targeting 422 cancer-related genes and in vitro studies were performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitries in Cancer
    Oncogene (2020) 39:6633–6646 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01459-w REVIEW ARTICLE Core transcriptional regulatory circuitries in cancer 1 1,2,3 1 2 1,4,5 Ye Chen ● Liang Xu ● Ruby Yu-Tong Lin ● Markus Müschen ● H. Phillip Koeffler Received: 14 June 2020 / Revised: 30 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 September 2020 / Published online: 17 September 2020 © The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) coordinate the on-and-off states of gene expression typically in a combinatorial fashion. Studies from embryonic stem cells and other cell types have revealed that a clique of self-regulated core TFs control cell identity and cell state. These core TFs form interconnected feed-forward transcriptional loops to establish and reinforce the cell-type- specific gene-expression program; the ensemble of core TFs and their regulatory loops constitutes core transcriptional regulatory circuitry (CRC). Here, we summarize recent progress in computational reconstitution and biologic exploration of CRCs across various human malignancies, and consolidate the strategy and methodology for CRC discovery. We also discuss the genetic basis and therapeutic vulnerability of CRC, and highlight new frontiers and future efforts for the study of CRC in cancer. Knowledge of CRC in cancer is fundamental to understanding cancer-specific transcriptional addiction, and should provide important insight to both pathobiology and therapeutics. 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: Introduction genes. Till now, one critical goal in biology remains to understand the composition and hierarchy of transcriptional Transcriptional regulation is one of the fundamental mole- regulatory network in each specified cell type/lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of SNP-Containing Regulatory Motifs in the Myelodysplastic Syndromes Model Using SNP Arrays Ad Gene Expression Arrays" (2013)
    University of Central Florida STARS Faculty Bibliography 2010s Faculty Bibliography 1-1-2013 Identification of SNP-containing egulatr ory motifs in the myelodysplastic syndromes model using SNP arrays ad gene expression arrays Jing Fan Jennifer G. Dy Chung-Che Chang University of Central Florida Xiaoboo Zhou Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Bibliography at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Bibliography 2010s by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Fan, Jing; Dy, Jennifer G.; Chang, Chung-Che; and Zhou, Xiaoboo, "Identification of SNP-containing regulatory motifs in the myelodysplastic syndromes model using SNP arrays ad gene expression arrays" (2013). Faculty Bibliography 2010s. 3960. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2010/3960 Chinese Journal of Cancer Original Article Jing Fan 1, Jennifer G. Dy 1, Chung鄄Che Chang 2 and Xiaobo Zhou 3 Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes have increased in frequency and incidence in the American population, but patient prognosis has not significantly improved over the last decade. Such improvements could be realized if biomarkers for accurate diagnosis and prognostic stratification were successfully identified. In this study, we propose a method that associates two state鄄of 鄄th e鄄ar t array technologies single nucleotide polymor鄄 要 phism (SNP) array and gene expression array with gene motifs considered transcription factor -binding 要 sites (TFBS). We are particularly interested in SNP鄄co ntaining motifs introduced by genetic variation and mutation as TFBS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Materials ZNF281 Enhances Cardiac Reprogramming
    Supplemental Materials ZNF281 enhances cardiac reprogramming by modulating cardiac and inflammatory gene expression Huanyu Zhou, Maria Gabriela Morales, Hisayuki Hashimoto, Matthew E. Dickson, Kunhua Song, Wenduo Ye, Min S. Kim, Hanspeter Niederstrasser, Zhaoning Wang, Beibei Chen, Bruce A. Posner, Rhonda Bassel-Duby and Eric N. Olson Supplemental Table 1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 2; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Table 3; related to the “quantitative mRNA measurement” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Table 4; related to the “ChIP-seq, gene ontology and pathway analysis” and “RNA-seq” and gene ontology analysis” in Materials and Methods section. Supplemental Figure S1; related to Figure 1. Supplemental Figure S2; related to Figure 2. Supplemental Figure S3; related to Figure 3. Supplemental Figure S4; related to Figure 4. Supplemental Figure S5; related to Figure 6. Supplemental Table S1. Genes included in human retroviral ORF cDNA library. Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Gene Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol AATF BMP8A CEBPE CTNNB1 ESR2 GDF3 HOXA5 IL17D ADIPOQ BRPF1 CEBPG CUX1 ESRRA GDF6 HOXA6 IL17F ADNP BRPF3 CERS1 CX3CL1 ETS1 GIN1 HOXA7 IL18 AEBP1 BUD31 CERS2 CXCL10 ETS2 GLIS3 HOXB1 IL19 AFF4 C17ORF77 CERS4 CXCL11 ETV3 GMEB1 HOXB13 IL1A AHR C1QTNF4 CFL2 CXCL12 ETV7 GPBP1 HOXB5 IL1B AIMP1 C21ORF66 CHIA CXCL13 FAM3B GPER HOXB6 IL1F3 ALS2CR8 CBFA2T2 CIR1 CXCL14 FAM3D GPI HOXB7 IL1F5 ALX1 CBFA2T3 CITED1 CXCL16 FASLG GREM1 HOXB9 IL1F6 ARGFX CBFB CITED2 CXCL3 FBLN1 GREM2 HOXC4 IL1F7
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenome-Wide Exploratory Study of Monozygotic Twins Suggests Differentially Methylated Regions to Associate with Hand Grip Strength
    Biogerontology (2019) 20:627–647 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-019-09818-1 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) RESEARCH ARTICLE Epigenome-wide exploratory study of monozygotic twins suggests differentially methylated regions to associate with hand grip strength Mette Soerensen . Weilong Li . Birgit Debrabant . Marianne Nygaard . Jonas Mengel-From . Morten Frost . Kaare Christensen . Lene Christiansen . Qihua Tan Received: 15 April 2019 / Accepted: 24 June 2019 / Published online: 28 June 2019 Ó The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Hand grip strength is a measure of mus- significant CpG sites or pathways were found, how- cular strength and is used to study age-related loss of ever two of the suggestive top CpG sites were mapped physical capacity. In order to explore the biological to the COL6A1 and CACNA1B genes, known to be mechanisms that influence hand grip strength varia- related to muscular dysfunction. By investigating tion, an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of genomic regions using the comb-p algorithm, several hand grip strength in 672 middle-aged and elderly differentially methylated regions in regulatory monozygotic twins (age 55–90 years) was performed, domains were identified as significantly associated to using both individual and twin pair level analyses, the hand grip strength, and pathway analyses of these latter controlling the influence of genetic variation. regions revealed significant pathways related to the Moreover, as measurements of hand grip strength immune system, autoimmune disorders, including performed over 8 years were available in the elderly diabetes type 1 and viral myocarditis, as well as twins (age 73–90 at intake), a longitudinal EWAS was negative regulation of cell differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion Genes Data Set
    Supplementary Table 1: Adhesion genes data set PROBE Entrez Gene ID Celera Gene ID Gene_Symbol Gene_Name 160832 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 223658 1 hCG201364.3 A1BG alpha-1-B glycoprotein 212988 102 hCG40040.3 ADAM10 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 10 133411 4185 hCG28232.2 ADAM11 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 11 110695 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 195222 8038 hCG40937.4 ADAM12 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 12 (meltrin alpha) 165344 8751 hCG20021.3 ADAM15 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 15 (metargidin) 189065 6868 null ADAM17 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (tumor necrosis factor, alpha, converting enzyme) 108119 8728 hCG15398.4 ADAM19 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 19 (meltrin beta) 117763 8748 hCG20675.3 ADAM20 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 20 126448 8747 hCG1785634.2 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 208981 8747 hCG1785634.2|hCG2042897 ADAM21 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 21 180903 53616 hCG17212.4 ADAM22 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 177272 8745 hCG1811623.1 ADAM23 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 23 102384 10863 hCG1818505.1 ADAM28 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 119968 11086 hCG1786734.2 ADAM29 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 29 205542 11085 hCG1997196.1 ADAM30 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 30 148417 80332 hCG39255.4 ADAM33 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 33 140492 8756 hCG1789002.2 ADAM7 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 7 122603 101 hCG1816947.1 ADAM8 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 8 183965 8754 hCG1996391 ADAM9 ADAM metallopeptidase domain 9 (meltrin gamma) 129974 27299 hCG15447.3 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-like,
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Accompanies CD8 T Cell Effector Function Global DNA Methylation
    Global DNA Methylation Remodeling Accompanies CD8 T Cell Effector Function Christopher D. Scharer, Benjamin G. Barwick, Benjamin A. Youngblood, Rafi Ahmed and Jeremy M. Boss This information is current as of October 1, 2021. J Immunol 2013; 191:3419-3429; Prepublished online 16 August 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301395 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/3419 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130139 Material 5.DC1 References This article cites 81 articles, 25 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/3419.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists by guest on October 1, 2021 • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Global DNA Methylation Remodeling Accompanies CD8 T Cell Effector Function Christopher D. Scharer,* Benjamin G. Barwick,* Benjamin A. Youngblood,*,† Rafi Ahmed,*,† and Jeremy M.
    [Show full text]
  • B-Cell Malignancies in Microrna Eμ-Mir-17∼92 Transgenic Mice
    B-cell malignancies in microRNA Eμ-miR-17∼92 transgenic mice Sukhinder K. Sandhua, Matteo Fassana,b, Stefano Voliniaa,c, Francesca Lovata, Veronica Balattia, Yuri Pekarskya, and Carlo M. Crocea,1 aDepartment of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210; bARC-NET Research Centre, University of Verona, VR 37134, Verona, Italy; cDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, FE 44121 Ferrara, Italy Contributed by Carlo M. Croce, September 22, 2013 (sent for review July 12, 2013) miR-17∼92 is a polycistronic microRNA (miR) cluster (consisting of cluster, but not of its paralogs, has shown that miR-17∼92 plays miR-17, miR-18a, miR-19a, miR-19b, miR-20a, and miR-92a) which an important role in B-cell development, and the KO mice die frequently is overexpressed in several solid and lymphoid malig- shortly after birth from lung hypoplasia and ventricular septal nancies. Loss- and gain-of-function studies have revealed the role defects (8). Further examination of the role of individual miRs in of miR-17∼92 in heart, lung, and B-cell development and in Myc- B-cell lymphomas showed that miR-19a and miR19b are required induced B-cell lymphomas, respectively. Recent studies indicate and sufficient for the proliferative activities of the cluster (9). that overexpression of this locus leads to lymphoproliferation, To understand better the role of the miR-17∼92 cluster in but no experimental proof that dysregulation of this cluster causes B-cell neoplastic progression, we generated miR-17∼92 B-cell– B-cell lymphomas or leukemias is available.
    [Show full text]