Norntates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Norntates PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y AMERICANt MUSEUM Norntates PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3187, 43 pp., 7 figures December 31, 1996 Middle-Ear Ossicles of the Multituberculate Kryptobaatar from the Mongolian Late Cretaceous: Implications for Mammaliamorph Relationships and the Evolution of the Auditory Apparatus* GUILLERMO W. ROUGIER,' 2 JOHN R. WIBLE,3 AND MICHAEL J. NOVACEK4 ABSTRACT Partial malleus, ectotympanic, and stylohyal After comparison of these elements with those along with a fragment of a possible stapes are of other mammaliamorphs, a matrix of 62 char- described for the multituberculate Kryptobaatar acters of the ossicles and basicranium across 19 dashzevegi from the Late Cretaceous of Mongo- taxa was compiled and analyzed with PAUP Four lia. The malleus, represented by the anterior pro- equally most parsimonious trees were obtained, cess (composed of the goniale), is attached and which differ in the relationships of multitubercu- only partially delimited by sutures from a segment lates, monotremes, and triconodonts with regard of the anterior crus of the ectotympanic. The pos- to the prototribosphenidan lineage. Monotremata sible stapes fragment may be part of a crus of a is either the sister group of Theriiformes (Multi- stirrup-shaped bone. tuberculata + Theria) or united with Multituber- * This is contribution number 21 of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences-American Museum of Natural History Paleontological Project. I Frick Research Fellow, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History. New York, NY 10024. 2 Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3Research Associate, Department of Mammalogy, American Museum of Natural History; Department of Anatom- ical Sciences and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville KY 40292. 4Curator, Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History. Copyright X) American Museum of Natural History 1996 ISSN 0003-0082 / Price $3.80 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3187 culata in a monophyletic grouping. Because the distic analysis suggests that definitive middle-ear ossicles are poorly or wholly unknown for most ossicles evolved in the last common ancestor of of the taxa considered, their phylogenetic bearing multituberculates, monotremes, triconodonts, and is limited. trechnotherians (symmetrodonts + therians) and The phylogenetic information derived from the that the triangular molar cusp pattern of kueh- transformations of the postdentary bones/ear os- neotheriids and trechnotherians is likely conver- sicles and the dentition is not congruent. Our cla- gent. INTRODUCTION The Reichert-Gaupp Theory (Reichert, middle-ear ossicles is suggested in the het- 1837; Gaupp, 1913) summarizes our under- erogeneous origin of the involved elements, standing of the homologies of the postdentary which include dermal ossifications (the ec- bones of non-mammalian amniotes with the totympanic and the anterior process of the middle-ear bones of mammals (for modem re- malleus) and derivatives from the mandibular views see Moore, 1981; Starck, 1979; and No- or first arch cartilage (the articular portion of vacek, 1993). The transformation of lower jaw the malleus and the incus), the hyoid or sec- elements into auditory structures, one of the ond arch cartilage (most of the stapes), and hallmarks of Mammalia (sensu Rowe, 1988, the auditory capsule (part of the stapedial the clade including the common ancestor of footplate) (Gegenbaur, 1898; Gaupp, 1908, extant mammals and all its descendants), had 1913; Anson et al., 1960). This complex pro- far-reaching repercussions for the origin and vides a wealth of anatomical variation that is subsequent evolution of the mammalian skull. widely accepted to be of significance for sys- Regions of the head thought to have been no- tematic and functional analyses (Fleischer, tably modified include the basicranium, the lat- 1973, 1978; Novacek and Wyss, 1986; Gau- eral wall of the braincase, and the masticatory din et al., 1996). Yet, study of the early evo- apparatus (Allin, 1975; Crompton and Hylan- lution of this system in the fossil record has der, 1986; Maier, 1987, 1993; Kuhn and Zeller, been hampered by the exceedingly fragile 1987; Allin and Hopson, 1992). nature of the middle-ear bones, which are The formation of an ossicular chain trans- only loosely attached to the skull base. A mitting sound from the outer to the inner ear bony bulla, which as a rule encloses the mid- from former load-bearing elements of the dle ear and protects the ossicles in living lower jaw can be traced in the fossil record therian mammals, is lacking in most early as well as in the ontogeny of living mammals mammals. Consequently, middle-ear bones (Reichert, 1837; Gaupp, 1913; Allin, 1975; are almost never preserved in Mesozoic Maier, 1990). The bony elements involved in mammals, even in fully articulated speci- mammals (and their homologs in non-mam- mens. The only ear ossicles reported from malian amniotes) are the ectotympanic (an- Mesozoic mammals are the stapes, malleus, gular), malleus (articular and prearticular or and incus of the multituberculate Chulsan- goniale), incus (quadrate), and finally, the baatar (Hurum et al., 1995) and the stapes stapes (columella auris or stapes). To date, of an indeterminate placental (Archibald, our understanding of the fate of the postden- 1979); both are Late Cretaceous in age. tary bones represents one of the most suc- Basal Mammaliaformes (sensu Rowe, cessful interplays between paleontology and 1988, the clade including the common an- embryology in establishing the major fea- cestor of Morganucodon and Mammalia plus tures of a complex evolutionary event. Nev- all its descendants) ought to play a prominent ertheless, aspects of this transformation are role in the elucidation of competing hypoth- still questioned, and radically new hypothe- eses about the origin of the mammalian au- ses (Jarvik, 1980) departing from the classic ditory apparatus, because theoretically they Reichert-Gaupp Theory and its modem for- can provide characters and combination of mulation (Allin, 1975, 1986; Allin and Hop- characters not present among living taxa son, 1992) have been proposed. (Gauthier et al., 1988; Donoghue et al., The complex history of the mammalian 1989). Fossils also can provide the historical 1996 ROUGIER ET AL.: KRYPTOBAATAR AND MAMMALIAMORPH RELATIONSHIPS 3 succession of events, permitting determina- and the number has increased since that re- tion of minimal ages for character transfor- port was submitted. As of that report, mul- mations (Novacek, 1992c; Norell, 1992; No- tituberculates represented over 80% of all rell and Novacek, 1992; Smith, 1994). Un- mammal skulls and skeletons collected from fortunately, the available information on this extremely rich locality. middle-ear bones in Mesozoic mammals is All Asian Late Cretaceous multitubercu- so deficient that these elements have played lates have been assigned to Taeniolabidoidea. an almost negligible role in our understand- Gobibaatar parvus, originally described as a ing of early mammal relationships. A few ptilodontoid (Kielan-Jaworowska, 1970), is characters, such as postdentary bones at- now regarded as a junior synonym of Kryp- tached to lower jaw, or suspended from cra- tobaatar (Kielan-Jaworowska, 1980). At nium, have been used for phylogenetic pur- present, eight monospecific genera of multi- poses (Rowe, 1988; Wible, 1991). However, tuberculates are recognized from the Mon- characters so general do not adequately re- golian Late Cretaceous. However, Tugrig- flect the numerous character transformations baatar saichaenensis, known only from the that ought to be expressed in a phylogenetic type specimen, an incomplete skull and low- analysis. Better preserved material and de- er jaws (Kielan-Jaworowska and Dashzeveg, tailed descriptions are needed so that these 1978), is likely a junior synonym of Kryp- elements can be included in the reconstruc- tobaatar (Rougier, Novacek, and Dashzeveg, tion of the overall framework of mammalian in prep.). evolution. Most of the multituberculates collected We provide here the' first substantial evi- from the Gobi Desert by the Mongolian- dence of the malleus and ectotympanic in American Expedition, including the two Mesozoic multituberculates, derived from specimens described here, are referable to Kryptobaatar dashzevegi from the Late Cre- Kryptobaatar dashzevegi (Kielan-Jaworow- taceous of Mongolia. Our description of ska, 1970), the most abundant mammalian these elements furnishes us the opportunity taxon from the to compare them with the ear ossicles pre- Djadokhta Formation (Kie- viously described in other multituberculates, lan-Jaworowska, 1974). The first of these i.e., the Late Cretaceous Chulsanbaatar (Hu- specimens, cataloged as PSS-MAE-1 13 (fig. rum et al., 1995) and the apomorphic Paleo- 1) in the Geological Institute, Ulaan Baatar, cene taeniolabidid Lambdopsalis (Miao and was found in Tugrugeen Shireh, also called Lillegraven, 1986; Miao, 1988; Meng, 1992; Toogreeg. This well-known locality (Kielan- Meng and Wyss, 1995), and in living mam- Jaworowska and Dashzeveg, 1978) has mals. In addition to the fragmentary malleus yielded numerous mammal and dinosaur re- and ectotympanic, we also describe a prob- mains, including the famous fighting dino- able fragment of stapes and the stylohyal in saurs (Kielan-Jaworowska and Barsbold, Kryptobaatar. Finally, a discussion
Recommended publications
  • Reptile-Like Physiology in Early Jurassic Stem-Mammals
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title: Reptile-like physiology in Early Jurassic stem-mammals Authors: Elis Newham1*, Pamela G. Gill2,3*, Philippa Brewer3, Michael J. Benton2, Vincent Fernandez4,5, Neil J. Gostling6, David Haberthür7, Jukka Jernvall8, Tuomas Kankanpää9, Aki 5 Kallonen10, Charles Navarro2, Alexandra Pacureanu5, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff11, Kelly Richards12, Kate Robson-Brown13, Philipp Schneider14, Heikki Suhonen10, Paul Tafforeau5, Katherine Williams14, & Ian J. Corfe8*. Affiliations: 10 1School of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 3Earth Science Department, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 4Core Research Laboratories, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 5European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. 15 6School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 7Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 8Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 9Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 10Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 20 11Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Zentrum für Material-und Küstenforschung GmbH Germany. 12Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, OX1 3PW, UK. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/785360; this version posted October 10, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 13Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 14Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Ischigualasto Formation. the Second Is a Sile- Diversity Or Abundance, but This Result Was Based on Only 19 of Saurid, Ignotosaurus Fragilis (Fig
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Chicago Library] On: 10 October 2013, At: 10:52 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujvp20 Vertebrate succession in the Ischigualasto Formation Ricardo N. Martínez a , Cecilia Apaldetti a b , Oscar A. Alcober a , Carina E. Colombi a b , Paul C. Sereno c , Eliana Fernandez a b , Paula Santi Malnis a b , Gustavo A. Correa a b & Diego Abelin a a Instituto y Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan , España 400 (norte), San Juan , Argentina , CP5400 b Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas , Buenos Aires , Argentina c Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, and Committee on Evolutionary Biology , University of Chicago , 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago , Illinois , 60637 , U.S.A. Published online: 08 Oct 2013. To cite this article: Ricardo N. Martínez , Cecilia Apaldetti , Oscar A. Alcober , Carina E. Colombi , Paul C. Sereno , Eliana Fernandez , Paula Santi Malnis , Gustavo A. Correa & Diego Abelin (2012) Vertebrate succession in the Ischigualasto Formation, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 32:sup1, 10-30, DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2013.818546 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2013.818546 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • O Esqueleto Pós-Craniano De Exaeretodon Riograndensis Abdala Et Al
    Rev. bras. paleontol. 10(2):79-94, Maio/Agosto 2007 © 2007 by the Sociedade Brasileira de Paleontologia O ESQUELETO PÓS-CRANIANO DE EXAERETODON RIOGRANDENSIS ABDALA ET AL. (CYNODONTIA, TRAVERSODONTIDAE), TRIÁSSICO DO BRASIL TÉO VEIGA DE OLIVEIRA, CESAR LEANDRO SCHULTZ & MARINA BENTO SOARES Instituto de Geociências, UFRGS, Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] RESUMO – Pela primeira vez, elementos pós-cranianos de Exaeretodon riograndensis, um cinodonte traversodontídeo da Cenozona de Rhynchosauria da Formação Santa Maria, Neotriássico do sul do Brasil, são descritos e comparados com E. frenguellii e outros cinodontes não-mamalianos. O material inclui parte da coluna vertebral, radio, ulna e elementos da cintura pélvica. As diferenças mais significativas em relação a E. frenguellii estão na morfologia e nas dimensões do arco neural do atlas, na presença de intercentros em vértebras cervicais posteriores ao áxis e na ausência da dilatação do ápice do espinho neural das vértebras truncais. A morfologia da região sacral da coluna, do rádio, da ulna e da cintura pélvica são concordantes com o observado em E. frenguellii. A comparação com outros táxons de cinodontes não-mamalianos permite a observação da nítida evolução em mosaico do esqueleto pós-craniano destes animais: E. riograndensis mostra alguns caracteres similares a outros Cynognathia (grupo ao qual pertence), enquanto outros são mais próximos aos observados em alguns Probainognathia (incluindo mamíferos), como a natureza mais avançada do complexo atlas-áxis. Palavras-chave: Triássico, Brasil, Formação Santa Maria, Traversodontidae, Exaeretodon riograndensis, pós-crânio. ABSTRACT – THE POSTCRANIAL SKELETON OF EXAERETODON RIOGRANDENSIS ABDALA ET AL.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Continental Late Triassic Tetrapod Biochronology. I. the Type Locality of Saturnalia Tupiniquim and the Faunal Succession in South Brazil
    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 19 (2005) 205–218 www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames Studies on continental Late Triassic tetrapod biochronology. I. The type locality of Saturnalia tupiniquim and the faunal succession in south Brazil Max Cardoso Langer* Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeira˜o Preto, SP, Brazil Received 1 November 2003; accepted 1 January 2005 Abstract Late Triassic deposits of the Parana´ Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, encompass a single third-order, tetrapod-bearing sedimentary sequence that includes parts of the Alemoa Member (Santa Maria Formation) and the Caturrita Formation. A rich, diverse succession of terrestrial tetrapod communities is recorded in these sediments, which can be divided into at least three faunal associations. The stem- sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim was collected in the locality known as ‘Waldsanga’ near the city of Santa Maria. In that area, the deposits of the Alemoa Member yield the ‘Alemoa local fauna,’ which typifies the first association; includes the rhynchosaur Hyperodapedon, aetosaurs, and basal dinosaurs; and is coeval with the lower fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation, Bermejo Basin, NW Argentina. The second association is recorded in deposits of both the Alemoa Member and the Caturrita Formation, characterized by the rhynchosaur ‘Scaphonyx’ sulcognathus and the cynodont Exaeretodon, and correlated with the upper fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation. Various isolated outcrops of the Caturrita Formation yield tetrapod fossils that correspond to post-Ischigualastian faunas but might not belong to a single faunal association. The record of the dicynodont Jachaleria suggests correlations with the lower part of the Los Colorados Formation, NW Argentina, whereas remains of derived tritheledontid cynodonts indicate younger ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Mammal Reveals a Mesozoic Ghost Lineage on Insular New Zealand, Southwest Pacific
    Miocene mammal reveals a Mesozoic ghost lineage on insular New Zealand, southwest Pacific Trevor H. Worthy*†, Alan J. D. Tennyson‡, Michael Archer§, Anne M. Musser¶, Suzanne J. Hand§, Craig Jonesʈ, Barry J. Douglas**, James A. McNamara††, and Robin M. D. Beck§ *School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Darling Building DP 418, Adelaide University, North Terrace, Adelaide 5005, South Australia, Australia; ‡Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington 6015, New Zealand; §School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, New South Wales 2052, Australia; ¶Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia; ʈInstitute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand; **Douglas Geological Consultants, 14 Jubilee Street, Dunedin 9011, New Zealand; and ††South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia Edited by James P. Kennett, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, and approved October 11, 2006 (sent for review July 8, 2006) New Zealand (NZ) has long been upheld as the archetypical Ma) dinosaur material (13) and isolated moa bones from marine example of a land where the biota evolved without nonvolant sediments up to 2.5 Ma (1, 14), the terrestrial record older than terrestrial mammals. Their absence before human arrival is mys- 1 Ma is extremely limited. Until now, there has been no direct terious, because NZ was still attached to East Antarctica in the Early evidence for the pre-Pleistocene presence in NZ of any of its Cretaceous when a variety of terrestrial mammals occupied the endemic vertebrate lineages, particularly any group of terrestrial adjacent Australian portion of Gondwana.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Studies on Mesozoic and Paleogene Mammals in China
    Vol.24 No.2 2010 Paleomammalogy Recent Advances in Studies on Mesozoic and Paleogene Mammals in China WANG Yuanqing* and NI Xijun Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, CAS, Beijing 10004, China ike in other fields of paleontology, research in from the articular of the lower jaw and the quadrate of the paleomammalogy mainly falls into two aspects. cranium following the process of reduction and detachment LOne is related to the biological nature of fossil from the reptilian mandible, are new elements of the bony mammals, such as their systematics, origin, evolution, chain in the mammalian middle ear. The appearance of phylogenetic relationships, transformation of key features mammalian middle ear allows mammals to hear the sound and paleobiogeography, and the other is related to the of higher frequencies than reptiles do. Generally speaking, geological context, involving biostratigraphy, biochronology, a widely accepted hypothesis is that mammals originated faunal turnover and its relations to the global and regional from a certain extinct reptilian group. The formation and environmental changes. In the last decade, a number of development of the definitive mammalian middle ear well-preserved mammalian specimens were collected from (DMME) has thus become one of the key issues in the study different localities around the country. Such discoveries have of mammalian evolution and has drawn the attention from provided significant information for understanding the early many researchers for many years. evolution of mammals and reconstructing the phylogeny of Developmental biological studies have proven the early mammals. function of the Meckel’s cartilage and its relationship to Studies of Chinese Mesozoic mammals achieved the ear ossicles during the development of mammalian remarkable progress in the past several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-78117-6 - Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America, Volume 2: Small Mammals, Xenarthrans, and Marine Mammals Christine M. Janis, Gregg F. Gunnell and Mark D. Uhen Excerpt More information 0 Introduction christine m. janis,1 gregg f. gunnell2 and mark d. uhen3 1Brown University, Providence, RI, USA 2Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 3Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA AIMS OF VOLUME 2 the chapter are presented according to a standardized format, and the institutional abbreviations have also been standardized and are This enterprise was originally conceived of as a single volume. How- listed in an appendix (Appendix III). ever, after a span of 10 years from its original conception, the current senior editor (Christine Janis), and the then junior editors (Kathleen Scott and Louis Jacobs) realized that it would be more realistic THE STANDARDIZED LAYOUT OF EACH CHAPTER to proceed with chapters then in hand, which could more or less be assembled into the conceptually useful, if taxonomically para- The chapters are laid out in a similar fashion to those in Volume 1. phyletic, rubric of “Terrestrial Carnivores and Ungulates” (Janis, The contributors were requested to adhere to a common layout for Scott, and Jacobs, 1998). This in part reflected the chapters that had each chapter, in order to provide uniform information throughout been assembled to date, although it should be noted that some of the book. The “Introduction” for each chapter introduces the group. the chapters in this current volume, most notably those by Darryl The “Defining features” section lays out the basic cranial, dental, Domning on sirenians and desmostylians, were among the first ones and postcranial features of the taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ear in Mammal-Like Reptiles and Early Mammals
    Acta Palaeontologica Polonica Vol. 28, No. 1-2 pp, 147-158 Warszawa, 1983 Second Symposium on Mesozoic T erre stial Ecosystems, Jadwisin 1981 KENNETH A. KERMACK and FRANCES MUSSETT THE EAR IN MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES AND EARLY MAMMALS KERMACK, K . A. a nd MUSS ETT, F.: The ear in mammal-like r eptiles an d early mammals. Acta Palaeont. P olonica , 28, 1-2, 147-158, 1983. Th e early m embers of the Theropsida lacked a tympanic membrane. In the later theropslds, the Therapsid a, a tym p an ic membrane develop ed from thc skin on the lateral side of th e lower jaw. The tympanum is not homologous In the Therapsida and ' t he Sauropslda. The ther apsid ea r w as a poor receiver of airborne sound, both In hi gh frequency r esp onse and In the r ange of frequencies encompassed. With the radiation of the Sauropsida in the Triassic the large therapsids became extinct, the small therap si ds evolv ed In to the mammal s and became nocturnal. High frequency hearin g w as essen tial for the nocturn al mode of life; quadrate and arttcutar became diss ociated from the jaw hinge to become the m ammali an au di tory ossi cles . I n the Theria the cochlea became coil ed. The spiral cochlea could n ot have existed until there w as a middle ear w ith the n ec essary h ig h f re q uency r esp onse. This m ay n ot have been until the Cretace ous.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals from the Mesozoic of Mongolia
    Mammals from the Mesozoic of Mongolia Introduction and Simpson (1926) dcscrihed these as placental (eutherian) insectivores. 'l'he deltathcroids originally Mongolia produces one of the world's most extraordi- included with the insectivores, more recently have narily preserved assemblages of hlesozoic ma~nmals. t)een assigned to the Metatheria (Kielan-Jaworowska Unlike fossils at most Mesozoic sites, Inany of these and Nesov, 1990). For ahout 40 years these were the remains are skulls, and in some cases these are asso- only Mesozoic ~nanimalsknown from Mongolia. ciated with postcranial skeletons. Ry contrast, 'I'he next discoveries in Mongolia were made by the Mesozoic mammals at well-known sites in North Polish-Mongolian Palaeontological Expeditions America and other continents have produced less (1963-1971) initially led by Naydin Dovchin, then by complete material, usually incomplete jaws with den- Rinchen Barsbold on the Mongolian side, and Zofia titions, or isolated teeth. In addition to the rich Kielan-Jaworowska on the Polish side, Kazi~nierz samples of skulls and skeletons representing Late Koualski led the expedition in 1964. Late Cretaceous Cretaceous mam~nals,certain localities in Mongolia ma~nmalswere collected in three Gohi Desert regions: are also known for less well preserved, but important, Bayan Zag (Djadokhta Formation), Nenlegt and remains of Early Cretaceous mammals. The mammals Khulsan in the Nemegt Valley (Baruungoyot from hoth Early and Late Cretaceous intervals have Formation), and llcrmiin 'ISav, south-\vest of the increased our understanding of diversification and Neniegt Valley, in the Red beds of Hermiin 'rsav, morphologic variation in archaic mammals. which have heen regarded as a stratigraphic ecluivalent Potentially this new information has hearing on the of the Baruungoyot Formation (Gradzinslti r't crl., phylogenetic relationships among major branches of 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Femur of a Morganucodontid Mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Central Russia
    Femur of a morganucodontid mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Central Russia PETR P. GAMBARYAN and ALEXANDER 0.AVERIANOV Gambaryan, P.P. & Averianov, A.O. 2001. Femur of a morganucodontid mammal from the Middle Jurassic of Central Russia. -Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 46,1,99-112. We describe a nearly complete mammalian femur from the Middle Jurassic (upper Bathonian) from Peski quarry, situated some 100 km south east of Moscow, central Rus- sia. It is similar to the femora of Morganucodontidae in having a globular femoral head, separated from the greater trochanter and reflected dorsally, fovea capitis present, both trochanters triangular and located on the same plane, distal end flat, mediolaterally expanded, and somewhat bent ventrally, and in the shape and proportions of distal condyles. It is referred to as Morganucodontidae gen. et sp. indet. It is the first representa- tive of this group of mammals in Eastern Europe from the third Mesozoic mammal local- ity discovered in Russia. Exquisite preservation of the bone surface allowed us to recon- struct partial hind limb musculature. We reconstruct m. iliopsoas as inserting on the ridge, which starts at the lesser trochanter and extends along the medial femoral margin for more than half of the femur length. On this basis we conclude that the mode of loco- motion of the Peski morganucodontid was similar to that of modern echidnas. During the propulsive phase the femur did not retract and the step elongation was provided by pronation of the femur. Key words : Mammalia, Morganucodontidae, femur, anatomy, locomotion, Jurassic, Russia. Petr P. Gambaryan [[email protected]] and Alexander 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous Amphilestid ('Triconodont') Mammals from Mongolia
    Early Cretaceous amphilestid ('triconodont') mammals from Mongolia ZOFIAKIELAN-JAWOROWSKA and DEMBERLYIN DASHZEVEG Kielan-Jaworowską Z. &Daslueveg, D. 1998. Early Cretaceous amphilestid (.tricono- dont') mammals from Mongotia. - Acta Pal.aeontol.ogicaPolonica,43,3, 413438. Asmall collection of ?Aptianor ?Albian amphilestid('triconodont') mammals consisting of incomplete dentaries and maxillae with teeth, from the Khoboor localiĘ Guchin Us counĘ in Mongolia, is described. Grchinodon Troftmov' 1978 is regarded a junior subjective synonym of GobiconodonTroftmov, 1978. Heavier wear of the molariforms M3 andM4than of themore anteriorone-M2 in Gobiconodonborissiaki gives indirect evidence formolariformreplacement in this taxon. The interlocking mechanismbetween lower molariforms n Gobiconodon is of the pattern seen in Kuchneotherium and Ttnodon. The ińterlocking mechanism and the type of occlusion ally Amphilestidae with Kuehneotheriidae, from which they differ in having lower molariforms with main cusps aligned and the dentary-squamosal jaw joint (double jaw joint in Kuehneotheńdae). The main cusps in upper molariforms M3-M5 of Gobiconodon, however, show incipient tńangular arrangement. The paper gives some support to Mills' idea on the therian affinities of the Amphilestidae, although it cannot be excluded that the characters that unite the two groups developed in parallel. Because of scanty material and arnbiguĘ we assign the Amphilestidae to order incertae sedis. Key words : Mammali4 .triconodonts', Amphilestidae, Kuehneotheriidae, Early Cretaceous, Mongolia. Zofia Kiel,an-Jaworowska [zkielnn@twarda,pan.pl], InsĘtut Paleobiologii PAN, ul. Twarda 5 I /5 5, PL-00-8 I 8 Warszawa, Poland. DemberĘin Dash7eveg, Geological Institute, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulan Bator, Mongolia. Introduction Beliajeva et al. (1974) reportedthe discovery of Early Cretaceous mammals at the Khoboor locality (referred to also sometimes as Khovboor), in the Guchin Us Soinon (County), Gobi Desert, Mongolia.
    [Show full text]