DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIbLIOGRApHY BOOKS AND PApERS Altstadt, Audrey. 1992. The Azerbaijani Turks: Power and Identity Under Russian Rule. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. Assenova, Margarita, and Zaur Shiriyev. 2015. Azerbaijan and the New Energy Geopolitics of Southeastern Europe. Washington, DC: Jamestown Foundation. Blank, Stephen (ed.). 2012. Perspectives on Russian Foreign Policy. Carlisle Barracks: Strategic Studies Institute/U.S. Army War College. Blank, Stephen. 2013. Azerbaijan’s Security and U.S. Interests: Time for a Reassessment. Washington, DC/Stockholm: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute/Silk Road Studies Program. Broers, Laurence (ed.). 2005. The Limits of Leadership: Elites and Societies in the Nagorny Karabakh Peace Process. London: Conciliation Resources. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1998. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books. Caspersen, Nina. 2016. Peace Agreements: Finding Solutions to Intra-state Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press. Coppieters, Bruno, and Robert Legvold (eds.). 2005. Statehood and Security: Georgia After the Rose Revolution. Cambridge/London: MIT Press. Cornell, Svante E. 1999. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Uppsala: Department of East European Studies, Report No. 46. http://expert-translations.ro/uploads/ Nagorno%20Karabah.pdf. Cornell, Svante E. 2001. Small Nations and Great Powers. London/New York: Routledge Curzon. Cornell, Svante E. 2011. Azerbaijan Since Independence. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. Cornell, Svante E., S. Frederick Starr, and Mamuka Tsereteli. 2015. A Western Strategy for the South Caucasus. Washington, DC/Stockholm: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute/Silk Road Studies Program. Croissant, Michael P. 1998. The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications. Westport: Praeger. © The Author(s) 2017 213 S.E. Cornell (ed.), The International Politics of the Armenian-­ Azerbaijani Conflict, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-60006-6 214 BiblioGraphy de Waal, Thomas. 2013. The Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War. New York/London: New York University Press. Dov, Lynch (ed.). 2003. The South Caucasus: A Challenge for the EU. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies/Chaillot Papers 65. Ergün, Ayça, and Hamlet Isaxanli (eds.). 2013. Security and Cross-Border Cooperation in the EU, Black Sea Region and the Southern Caucasus. Amsterdam: IOS Press. Giles, Keir, Philip Hanson, Roderic Lyne, James Nixey, James Sherr, and Andrew Wood (eds.). 2015. The Russian Challenge. London: Chatham House Report. Goltz, Thomas. 1999. Azerbaijan Diary. London: Routledge. Human Rights Watch. 1992. Bloodshed in the Caucasus – Escalation of the Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. September, 1992. https://www.hrw.org/report/1992/09/01/ bloodshed-caucasus/escalation-armed-conflict-nagorno-karabakh. Human Rights Watch. 1993. The Former Soviet Union – Human Rights Developments. 1993. https://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/WR93/Hsw-07.htm. Human Rights Watch. 1994. Azerbaijan: Seven years of conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. December, 1994. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/AZER%20 Conflict%20in%20N-K%20Dec94.pdf. International Crisis Group. 2005a. Nagorno Karabakh: A Plan for Peace, Europe Report No. 167, 11 Oct, 2005. International Crisis Group. 2005b. Nagorno-Karabakh: Viewing the Conflict from the Ground. Europe Report No. 166, 14 May 2005. International Crisis Group. 2006. Conflict Resolution in the South Caucasus: The EU’s Role, Europe Report No. 173, 20 Mar 2006. Kambeck, Michael, and Sargis Ghazaryan (eds.). 2013. Europe’s Next Avoidable War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Kruger, Heiko. 2010. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: A Legal Analysis. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer. Libaridian, Gerard J. 2007. Modern Armenia: People, Nation, State. New Brunswick: Transaction. Mkrtchyan, Tigran, Huseynov Tabib, and Gogolashvili Kakha (eds.). 2009. The European Union and the South Caucasus. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Muzaffarli, Nazim, and Eldar Ismailov. 2010. Basic Principles for the Rehabilitation of Azerbaijan’s Post-Conflict Territories. Stockholm: CC Press. Nichol, Jim. Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service, 2 Apr 2014. https://www.fas. org/sgp/crs/row/RL33453.pdf. Oliphant, J.C. 1992. Nationalities Problems in the Former Soviet Union. Sandhurst: Soviet Studies Research Centre/Royal Military Academy. Poghosbekian, Elina, and Anna Simonian (eds.). 2006. The Karabakh Conflict: To Understand Each Other. Yerevan: Yerevan Press Club. Popescu, Nicu. 2011. EU Foreign Policy and Post-Soviet Conflicts: Stealth Intervention. London: Routledge. Potier, Tim. 2000. Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. Shaffer, Brenda. 2002. Borders and Brethren: Iran and the Challenge of Azerbaijani Identity. Cambridge: MIT Press. Sherr, James. 2013. Hard Diplomacy and Soft Coercion: Russia’s Influence Abroad. London: Chatham House. BiblioGraphy 215 Sherr, James. 2015. The New East–west Discord: Russian Objectives, Western Interests. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations/Clingendael Report. South, Caucasus. 2011. 20 Years of Independence. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Starr, S. Frederick, and Svante Cornell (eds.). 2014. Putin’s Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and Its Discontents. Washington, DC/Stockholm: Central Asia-­ Caucasus Institute/Silk Road Studies Program. Starr, S. Frederick, Svante E. Cornell, and Norling Nicklas. 2015. The EU, Central Asia, and the Development of Continental Transport and Trade. Washington, DC/ Stockholm: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute/Silk Road Studies Program. Weller, Marc. 2008. Escaping the Self-Determination Trap. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Weller, Marc, and Stefan Wolff (eds.). 2005. Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution. London: Routledge. Welt, Cory, and Alexander Schmemann (eds.). 2010. After the Color Revolutions, Political Change and Democracy Promotion in Eurasia. Washington, DC: PONARS Eurasia. Wimmer, Andreas (ed.). 2004. Facing Ethnic Conflicts: Towards a New Realism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. Zürcher, Christoph. 2007. The Post-Soviet Wars: Rebellion, Ethnic Conflict and Nationhood in the Caucasus. New York/London: New York University Press. JOURNAL ARTICLES Aydın, Mustafa. 2004. Foucalt’s Pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Turkish Studies 5(2): 1–22. Baev, Pavel, and Indra Øverland. 2010. The South Stream versus Nabucco pipeline race. International Affairs 65(5): 1075–1090. Blank, Stephen. 1995. Russia and Europe in the Caucasus. European Security 4(4): 622–645. Blank, Stephen. 2013. “AWOL: US Policy in Central Asia,” Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 30 Oct 2013. http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-­ articles/item/12848-awol-us-policy-in-central-asia.html. Blank, Stephen. 2014. “Washington Misses the Point on Nagorno-Karabakh,” Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 18 June 2014. http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/ analytical-articles/item/12998-washington-misses-the-point-on-nagorno-­ karabakh.html. Blank, Stephen. 2015. US policy, Azerbaijan, and the Nagorno Karabakh Conflict. Mediterranean Quarterly 26(2): 99–114. Bölükbasi, Süha. 1997. Ankara’s Baku-Centered Transcaucasia Policy: Has It Failed? Middle East Journal 50(1): 80–94. Broers, Laurence. 2015. From ‘Frozen Conflict’ to Enduring Rivalry: Reassessing the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict.Nationalities Papers 43(4): 556–576. Caspersen, Nina. 2008. Between Puppets and Independent Actors: Kin-state involve- ment in the Conflicts in Bosnia, Croatia and Nagorno Karabakh.Ethnopolitics 7(4): 357–372. Caspersen, Nina. 2012. Regimes and Peace Processes: Democratic (non)development in Armenia and Azerbaijan and Its Impact on the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45: 131–139. 216 BiblioGraphy Caspersen, Nina. 2015. The Pursuit of International Recognition after Kosovo. Global Governance 21(3): 393–412. de Waal, Thomas. 2010. Remaking the Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process. Survival 52(4): 159–176. de Waal, Thomas. 2015. “The Karabakh truce under threat,” Carnegie Moscow Center: Eurasia Outlook, 12 Feb 2015. http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=59049. Frolov, Andrei. 2014. “Military build-up in the South Caucasus: An arms race?” Russian International Affairs Council, 10 Jul 2014. http://russiancouncil.ru/ inner/?id_4=4026#_ftnref9. Gahramanova, Aytan. 2010. Paradigms of Political Mythologies and Perspectives of Reconciliation in the Case of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict.International Negotiation 15(1): 133–152. Ghaplanyan, Irina. 2010. Empowering and Engaging Civil Society in Conflict Resolution: The Case of Nagorno Karabakh. International Negotiation 15: 81–106. Grigoryan, Armen. 2015a. “Turkey-Armenia relations and Turkey’s elections,” Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 27 May 2015. http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/ analytical-articles/item/13225-turkey-armenia-relations-after-turkey%E2%80%99s-­ elections.html. Grigoryan, Armen. 2015b. “Armenia and the Iran Deal,” Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 31 Aug 2015. http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-­ articles/item/13263-armenia-and-the-iran-deal.html. Hopmann, P.T., and I.W. Zartman. 2010. Overcoming the Nagorno-Karabakh Stalemate. International Negotiation 15(1): 1–6. Huseynov, Tabib. 2010. Mountainous Karabakh: New Paradigms for Peace and Development in the 21st Century. International Negotiation 15(1): 7–31. Kasprzyk, Andrzej. 2003. How should the OSCE deal with the Nagorno
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • Societal Perceptions of the Conflict in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh
    Caucasus Institute Policy Paper Societal Perceptions of the Conflict in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh Hrant Mikaelian © 2017 Caucasus Institute, Yerevan Policy Paper www.c-i.am SOCIETAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE CONFLICT IN ARMENIA AND NAGORNO-KARABAKH Caucasus Institute Policy Paper Yerevan, December 2017 Author: Hrant Mikaelian, Research Fellow at the Caucasus Institute Editors: Nina Iskandaryan, Liana Avetisyan 1 This policy paper is part of a project on Engaging society and decision-makers in dialogue for peace over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict implemented by the Caucasus Institute with support from the UK Government’s Conflict, Stability and Security Fund. Page The project is aimed at reducing internal vulnerabilities created by unresolved conflicts and inter-ethnic tension, and increasing the space for constructive dialogue on conflict resolution, creating capacities and incentives for stakeholders in Armenia and Nagorno- Karabakh for resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, reconciliation and peace- building. Opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and may not reflect the views of the Caucasus Institute or any other organization, including project sponsors and organizations with which the authors are affiliated. All personal and geographical names used in this volume are spelled the way they were spelled by the authors. SOCIETAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE CONFLICT IN ARMENIA AND NAGORNO-KARABAKH War or Peace? Public Opinion and Expectations ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with a Rising Power
    Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Svante Cornell, Gerald Knaus, Manfred Scheich Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Svante Cornell, Gerald Knaus, Manfred Scheich CREDITS Centre for European Studies Cover design: RARO S.L. Layout: Victoria Agency Printed in Belgium by Drukkerij Jo Vandenbulcke Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 Brussels, BE – 1000 The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP) dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Centre for European Studies 2012 Photos used in this publication: Centre for European Studies 2012 The European Parliament and the Centre for European Studies assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. Sole responsibility lies on the author of this publication. 2 Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU About the CES The Centre for European Studies (CES), established in 2007, is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP). The CES embodies a pan-European mindset, promoting Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. It serves as a framework for national political foundations linked to member parties of the EPP, with 25 foundations currently members. The CES takes part in the preparation of EPP political platforms and programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • CACI Analyst, February 18, 2015 (.Pdf)
    Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 18 February 2015 1 Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 17 NO. 03 18 FEBRUARY 2015 Contents Analytical Articles GYUMRI MURDERS THREATEN TO DISRUPT ARMENIA’S RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA 3 Eduard Abrahamyan SANCTIONS, ENERGY PRICES, AND RUBLE DEPRECIATION CHALLENGE CIS GOVERNMENTS 7 Stephen Blank DAGESTAN’S JIHADISTS AND HARAM TARGETING 10 Emil Souleimanov AZERBAIJAN INVESTS IN UPGRADING ITS TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 14 John C.K. Daly Field Reports ARMENIAN PRESIDENT REJECTS TURKISH INVITATION TO ATTEND GALLIPOLI ANNIVERSARY 18 Erik Davtyan POLICE ARRESTED FOR OLD MURDER CASE IN GEORGIA 20 Eka Janashia KYRGYZSTAN DEBATES ELECTORAL SYSTEM REFORM 22 Arslan Sabyrbekov TAJIK PRESIDENT REVIEWS CHALLENGES IN ANNUAL ADDRESS TO PARLIAMENT 24 Oleg Salimov Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 18 February 2015 2 THE CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASS ANALYST Editor: Svante E. Cornell Associate Editor: Niklas Nilsson Assistant Editor, News Digest: Alima Bissenova Chairman, Editorial Board: S. Frederick Starr The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is an English-language journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing Central Asia and the Caucasus. It serves to link the business, governmental, journalistic and scholarly communities and is the global voice of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program Joint Center. The Editor of the Analyst solicits most articles and field reports, however authors are encouraged to suggest topics for future issues or submit articles and field reports for consideration. Such articles and field reports cannot have been previously published in any form, must be written in English, and must correspond precisely to the format and style of articles and field reports published in The Analyst, described below.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia and the Caucasus: a Vulnerable Crescent
    Central Asia and the Caucasus: A Vulnerable Crescent Coping with Crisis Working Paper Series Thomas de Waal and Anna Matveeva February 2007 International Peace Academy About the Author Thomas de Waal is Caucasus Editor at the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, London and writes about the Caucasus and Russia. He completed a degree in Russian and Modern Greek at Oxford, before working for the BBC, The Moscow Times and The Times in London and Moscow. He is co-author with Carlotta Gall of Chechnya: A Small Victorious War, and is author of Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War, the first thorough book in English about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He writes and broadcasts for a number of media outlets. Anna Matveeva is an Associate Fellow at the Crisis States Research Centre at the London School of Economics. She has previously worked as a UNDP Regional Adviser on Peace and Development for Central Asia, and as a Research Fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. She has published extensively, including a Chaillot Paper for the EU Institute for Security Studies on the “EU Stakes in Central Asia,” a Chatham House Paper on “The North Caucasus: Russia’s Fragile Borderland,” and a recent report for International Alert on “Central Asia: Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding.” Acknowledgements IPA owes a great debt of thanks to its many donors to Coping with Crisis. Their support for this Program reflects a widespread demand for innovative thinking on practical solutions to international challenges. In particular, IPA is grateful to the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian-Georgian War: Political and Military Implications for U.S
    The Russian-Georgian War: Political and Military Implications for U.S. Policy Jon E. Chicky POLICY PAPER February 2009 The Russian-Georgian War: Political and Military Implications for U.S. Policy Jon. E. Chicky February 2009 © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "The Russian-Georgian War: Political and Military Implications for U.S. Policy" is a Policy Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program Joint Center. The Policy Papers Series aims to provide concise and accessible analysis of contemporary issues and events. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non- profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy- watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Abkhazia: the Long Road to Reconciliation
    Abkhazia: The Long Road to Reconciliation Europe Report N°224 | 10 April 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Political Realities in Abkhazia .......................................................................................... 3 A. Russia’s Military Presence ......................................................................................... 3 B. Russian Financial Dependence .................................................................................. 6 C. Property and Other Disputes ..................................................................................... 8 III. Overcoming Obstacles in the Georgia-Russia Standoff and Abkhazia ........................... 12 A. Georgia-Russia Relations .......................................................................................... 12 B. The Geneva International Discussions and Humanitarian Issues ............................ 13 C. The Non-Use of Force ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The August 2007 Bombing Incident in Georgia: Implications for Thethethe Euroeuro----Atlanticatlantic Region
    The August 6 Bombing Incident in Georgia: Implications for the Euro-Atlantic Region Svante E. Cornell David J. Smith S. Frederick Starr SILK ROAD PAPER October 2007 The August 2007 Bombing Incident in Georgia: Implications for thethethe EuroEuro----AtlanticAtlantic Region Svante E. Cornell David J. Smith S. Frederick Starr © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, SE-13130 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “TheThe August 2007 Bombing Incident iinn Georgia: ImplicationsImplications for the EuroEuro----AtlanticAtlantic RegionRegion” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, published jointly on topical and timely subjects. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program is a joint transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Radicalism in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Implications for the EU
    Islamic Radicalism in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Implications for the EU Zeyno Baran S. Frederick Starr Svante E. Cornell SILK ROAD PAPER July 2006 Islamic Radicalism in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Implications for the EU Zeyno Baran S. Frederick Starr Svante E. Cornell © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Uppsala University, Box 514, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Islamic Radicalism in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Implications for the EU” is a Silk Road Paper produced by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers series is the Occasional Papers series of the Joint Center, published jointly on topical and timely subjects. It is edited by Svante E. Cornell, Research and Publications Director of the Joint Center. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program is a joint transatlantic independent and externally funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Uppsala, and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Department of Eurasian Studies of Uppsala University. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading focus of research and policy worldwide, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region; and to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion of the region through its applied research, its publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Final.Indd
    ARMENIA'S FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC POLITICS: DEVELOPMENT TRENDS Yerevan - 2013 UDC 32.001 ARMENIA’S FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC POLITICS: DEVELOPMENT TRENDS. – Mikko Palonkorpi and Alexander Iskandaryan (Eds.) –Yerevan: Caucasus Institute and Aleksanteri Institute, 2013. 92 p. Edited by Mikko Palonkorpi and Alexander Iskandaryan Copy editing by Richard Giragosian and Nina Iskandaryan Translations by Nina Iskandaryan Cover design by Matit www.matit.am Layout by Collage www.collage.am ISBN 978-99941-2-915-7 © 2013 by the Caucasus Institute © 2013 by the Aleksanteri Institute © 2013 by the MFA of Finland The publication is a joint project of the Caucasus Institute (Armenia) and the Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki (Finland). It has been supported by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Papers included in this volume refl ect the personal opinions of the authors and not those of the publishers, sponsors or any other organizations including ones with which the authors are or were affi liated. TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. Preface ..............................................................................................................5 Armenia’s Foreign Policy: Where Values Meet Constraints, by Alexander Iskandaryan ...................................................................................6 The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in the Foreign, Military and Domestic Politics of Armenia: an Assessment, by Sergey Minasyan .........................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    annual report 2010 annual report2010 Dear friends and colleagues, In 2010, the Asia Program’s activities were particularly focused on the Korean Peninsula, Sino-Japanese relations, cross-Strait rela- tions, China, Myanmar, and ethnic relations in South Asia. In April 2010, an ISDP delegation visited DPRK which was followed by a visit from the Institute for Disarmament and Peace (IDP) in DPRK to ISDP in June. The existing cooperation was further strengthened by a scholastic exchange when two guest researchers from IDP completed a two week research stay at ISDP which resulted in two publications presenting the North Korean perspective of the reunification issue and prospects of the peace treaty on the Korean Peninsula. The China Initiative continued to thrive with several main events this year such as a high profile visit of a CICIR delegation to ISDP and the annual ISDP-AMS conference focusing on ‘A New Strategic Landscape: Changes, Challenges and Consequences’ held in Stockholm this year. ISDP welcomed six guest researchers from China this year; we believe that such exchanges are essen- tial not only for our work but also for strengthening understanding between Sweden, respective Europe, and China at large. Furthermore, the Institute launched, with three other policy oriented think tanks in Stockholm, an Asia Security Group. The initiative is dedicated to make Stockholm a European hub for research on East Asia with a specific focus on regional security issues. The Silk Road Studies Program’s main focus remained on the South Caucasus and the Black Sea Region. In February, ISDP orga- nized a Silk Road Studies Workshop on Georgia’s strategy on the occupied territories in Tbilisi and has been involved in numerous activities concerning the situation in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus Institute (CACI)
    1 Caucasus & Central Asia Post COVID-19 Edited by Ilya Roubanis (PhD) Director of Programs Strasbourg Policy Centre Volume I 2 Strasbourg Policy Centre The Strasbourg Policy Centre (SPC) launched in 2020 is a forum dedicated to exploring Europe’s role in the world. We explore the regulatory, financial, human rights, and security ties that bind Europe together as “an international actor” of consequence with the rest of the world. The Caucasus and Central Asia Program investigates the way the Europe connects with the region that bridges the Atlantic and the Pacific Economy. We look at the web of regulatory standards, collective security platforms, and human rights regimes that underpin Europe’s relationship to a region with geopolitical fluidity and tremendous potential. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute (CACI) The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute (CACI) was founded in 1997 to respond to the increasing need for information, research and analysis on the vast territory of Central Eurasia stretching from Turkey to Western China, encompassing eight former Soviet republics as well as Afghanistan. CACI is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington, D.C., and forms a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center with the Institute for Security and Development Policy’s Silk Road Studies Program in Stockholm. Led by founding Chairman, Dr. S. Frederick Starr, and Director, Dr. Svante E. Cornell, CACI convenes regular Forum meetings and publishes the Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, Turkey Analyst and Silk Road Papers. Learn more at http://www.silkroadstudies.org. The CAMCA Network The CAMCA Network is a collection of professionals committed to sharing ideas, knowledge, expertise, experience and inspiration across the 10 countries of Central Asia, Mongolia, the Caucasus and Afghanistan (CAMCA).
    [Show full text]