17, September 12, 1982
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition 2010
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition 2010 Louisville, Kentucky, USA 20-23 June 2010 Volume 1 of 21 ISBN: 978-1-61782-020-5 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2010) by the American Society for Engineering Education All rights reserved. Printed by Curran Associates, Inc. (2010) For permission requests, please contact American Society for Engineering Education at the address below. American Society for Engineering Education 1818 N Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036-2479 Phone: (202) 331-3500 Fax: (202) 265-8504 www.asee.org Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2634 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 1118: SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EDUCATORS I 1166: TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR EMBEDDED SYSTEMS DESIGN ......................................................1 Fadi Obeidat, Ruba Alkhasawneh, Jerry Tucker, Robert Klenke 1304: AN APPLICATION-BASED APPROACH TO INTRODUCING MICROCONTROLLERS TO FIRST- YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS ............................................................................................................................................................11 Warren Rosen, Eric Carr 45: HDL BASED DESIGN PROBLEMS FOR COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE ..................................................................................20 -
Glanville Ranulph
Welcome to C:ADM2010 We come together to take part in a conference where the main activity is to explore by listening, talking and questioning (conversing) rather than by listening to, and giving, prepared lectures: where the aim is to move forward, taking next steps as a result of these conversations, rather than reporting on the already discovered. In other words, this is a conference where the intention is to progress by conferring. That is the central feature of our conference: a conference of conversation, open minds and delight in the un-thought- of. And what better way to make an interesting conversation than to bring together people whose backgrounds and interests are different, yet who want to learn by listening to others, to find what can be shared? In other words, to transcend boundaries. So we are, by definition, practitioners and theorists from 4 different subjects, who explore across boundaries. But not just any 4 subjects. Subjects that already hold conversations together in pairs: art; cybernetics; design; mathematics. With all 4 together, we have a wider conversation, greater variety. Our 4 subjects have a special quality in common. Each is used to comment—throw light—on and inform other subjects. Perhaps mathematics is the most obvious case: a subject in its own right that is used everywhere to illuminate (and make operable) other subjects. But also a subject that can comment on itself: a subject which is a meta-subject, even to itself. Participants will undoubtedly hold individual positions in regard to these four subjects cybernetics, art, design and mathematics. -
The Prospect of Interspecies Cybernetic Communication Between Humankind and Post-Humans Designed and Created for Space Exploration and Space Settlement
Journal of Space Philosophy 6, no. 1 (Fall 2017) The Prospect of Interspecies Cybernetic Communication Between Humankind and Post-Humans Designed and Created for Space Exploration and Space Settlement By George S. Robinson Abstract This paper discusses the creation of a post human “species” and its subsequent communication and physical interactions, using cybernetic principles. It notes that (1) Homo sapiens sapiens (i.e., modern man/woman/humankind) made, and continues to make, significant strides in developing the technology for self-metabolizing, self- replicating, and self-evolving, technological post-humans; and (2) rapidly developing artificial intelligence in extremis will result in a unique and alien entity functioning both independently and as a representative of humankind off-Earth. It discusses the underlying design and program activity of Earth-bound humankind, i.e., transhumans, and then post- humans … and their self-evolving subsequent generations. It assumes that Homo sapiens sapiens can and will use rapidly evolving multi-fields of integrated technology to create a totally post human “species.” It focuses on a non-biotic species of technology; perhaps the incipient stage of self-replicating artificial intelligence in extremis on its own, totally technological evolutionary bush.1 Keywords: Cybernetics, cybernetic communication, transhumans, technological post humans, Metalaw, artificial intelligence (AI) in extremis. Introduction: The Next Frontier in Human Evolution? What? We’re taking ourselves off the bush of biotic evolution? Who really cares? Where is the fun in that? (Anonymous) Longfellow: “He builds too low who builds beneath the stars.” Cyril Ponnamperuma (American chemist and astrobiologist): “The division between life and non-life is perhaps an artificial one.” I. -
© Robert White Scott, 2011
© Robert White Scott, 2011 AN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY OF THE SCHOOL FOR DESIGNING A SOCIETY BY ROBERT WHITE SCOTT DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Policy Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Antonia Darder, Chair Associate Professor Pradeep Dhillon Associate Professor Yoon Pak Assistant Professor Rebecca Ginsburg ABSTRACT This dissertation traces the roots of an experimental art school for social change called the School for Designing a Society. It focuses on the history of a group of intellectuals, and their ideas, during the latter half of the twentieth century. The composer Herbert Brün (1918-2000) formulated many of the original ideas used by the school in concert with his students and colleagues at the University of Illinois. This study focuses on how their ideas about composition led to the founding of a school. It begins with the turmoil of World War II, which influenced experimental artists such as Brün; the development of cybernetics as an interdisciplinary field; the attempt of Brün and cyberneticians to offer an experimental interdisciplinary course in 1968. As the 1960s faded out, a new crop of music composition students rallied around Brün. They formed an ensemble and renewed the bridge to cybernetics; the ensemble achieved a high level of professionalism and toured internationally. Elements of Marianne Brün’s course on Designing Society, and Susan Parenti’s skill at organizing an experimental arts ensemble led to a 1992 proposal to start a school. Members of the ensemble needed a discursive context to engage the political and social consequences of experimental art production. -
Technical Session Table of Contents
Technical Session Table of Contents Session T1A: Keynote - "Engineering as a Human Endeavor", William Wulf Chair: Melinda Piket-May and James Avery, University of Colorado at Boulder Time and place: Thursday, 8:30 am - 9:30 am Westminster 3 & 4 KEYNOTE - ENGINEERING AS A HUMAN ENDEAVOR . 59 William Wulf, National Academy of Engineering Session T2A: Successful Students Chair: Elizabeth A. Eschenbach, Humboldt State University Time and place: Thursday, 10:00 am - 11:45 am Cotton Creek I THE STUDY STRATEGIES OF ACADEMICALLY SUCCESSFUL STUDENTS AT THE COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES . 59 Ruth A. Streveler, Colorado School of Mines, Tawni Hoeglund, Colorado School of Mines and Carla Stein, Western Nebraska Community College A RETROSPECTIVE PROFILE OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GRADUATES FROM THE FAMU-FSU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING . .59 Leslie Inniss, Florida A&M University and Reginald Perry, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering WORK IN PROGRESS - CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS WHO FAILED (OR SUCCEEDED) THE INTRODUCTORY CS COURSE . 59 Judith Gal-Ezer, The Open University of Israel, Tamar Vilner, The Open University of Israel and Ela Zur, The Open University of Israel PREDICTING STUDENT PERFORMANCE: AN APPLICATION OF DATA MINING METHODS WITH AN EDUCATIONAL WEB-BASED SYSTEM . 60 Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli, Michigan State University, Deborah A. Kashy, Michigan State University, Gerd Kortemeyer, Michigan State University and William F. Punch, Michigan State University A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS SUCCESS AND PERSISTENCE . .60 Brian F. French, Purdue University, Jason C. Immekus, Purdue University and William Oakes, Pur- due University ENGINEERING SCHOLARS PROGRAM AT FAU . 60 Sam Hsu, Florida Atlantic University, Sharon Schlossberg, Florida Atlantic University and Karl Stevens, Florida Atlantic University Session T2B: Assessment and Information Technology Chair: Susan Haag, Arizona State University Time and place: Thursday, 10:00 am - 11:45 am Cotton Creek II WORK IN PROGRESS - NUMBERS ARE NO SUBSTITUTE FOR JUDGEMENT.