Archived MSRB Reports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archived MSRB Reports Archived MSRB Reports The following links provide access to historical MSRB reports published from 1981 through 2001: 2001 July 2001 - Volume 21, Number 2 May 2001 - Volume 21, Number 1 2000 November 2000 - Volume 20, Number 2 March 2000 - Volume 20, Number 1 1999 September 1999 - Volume 19, Number 3 April 1999 - Volume 19, Number 2 February 1999 - Volume 19, Number 1 1998 August 1998 - Volume 18, Number 2 February 1998 - Volume 18, Number 1 1997 October 1997 - Volume 17, Number 3 June 1997 - Volume 17, Number 2 January 1997 - Volume 17, Number 1 1996 September 1996 - Volume 16, Number 3 June 1996 - Volume 16, Number 2 January 1996 - Volume 16, Number 1 1995 October 1995 - Volume 15, Number 3 July 1995 - Volume 15, Number 2 April 1995 - Volume 15, Number 1 1994 December 1994 - Volume 14, Number 5 August 1994 - Volume 14, Number 4 June 1994 - Volume 14, Number 3 March 1994 - Volume 14, Number 2 January 1994 - Volume 14, Number 1 1993 August 1993 - Volume 13, Number 4 June 1993 - Volume 13, Number 3 April 1993 - Volume 13, Number 2 January 1993 - Volume 13, Number 1 1992 September 1992 - Volume 12, Number 3 July 1992 - Volume 12, Number 2 April 1992 - Volume 12, Number 1 1991 September 1991 - Volume 11, Number 3 June 1991 - Volume 11, Number 2 March 1991 - Volume 11, Number 1 1990 October 1990 - Volume 10, Number 4 July 1990 - Volume 10, Number 3 May 1990 - Volume 10, Number 2 January 1990 - Volume 10, Number 1 1989 November 1989 - Volume 9, Number 3 August 1989 - Volume 9, Number 2 March 1989 - Volume 9, Number 1 1988 December 1988 - Volume 8, Number 5 August 1988 - Volume 8, Number 4 May 1988 - Volume 8, Number 3 March 1988 - Volume 8, Number 2 January 1988 - Volume 8, Number 1 1987 November 1987 - Volume 7, Number 5 September 1987 - Volume 7, Number 4 June 1987 - Volume 7, Number 3 March 1987 - Volume 7, Number 2 January 1987 - Volume 7, Number 1 1986 October 1986 - Volume 6, Number 5 September 1986 - Volume 6, Number 4 June 1986 - Volume 6, Number 3 March 1986 - Volume 6, Number 2 January 1986 - Volume 6, Number 1 1985 November 1985 - Volume 5, Number 6 August 1985 - Volume 5, Number 5 June 1985 - Volume 5, Number 4 April 1985 - Volume 5, Number 3 February 1985 - Volume 5, Number 2 January 1985 - Volume 5, Number 1 1984 November 1984 - Volume 4, Number 6 August 1984 - Volume 4, Number 5 June 1984 - Volume 4, Number 4 May 1984 - Volume 4, Number 3 March 1984 - Volume 4, Number 2 February 1984 - Volume 4, Number 1 1983 December 1983 - Volume 3, Number 7 November 1983 - Volume 3, Number 6 September 1983 - Volume 3, Number 5 July 1983 - Volume 3, Number 4 May 1983 - Volume 3, Number 3 April 1983 - Volume 3, Number 2 January 1983 - Volume 3, Number 1 1982 December 1982 - Volume 2, Number 7 October 1982 - Volume 2, Number 6 August 1982 - Volume 2, Number 5 July 1982 - Volume 2, Number 4 March/April - Volume 2, Number 3 February 1982 - Volume 2, Number 2 January 1982 - Volume 2, Number 1 1981 November 1981 - Volume 1, Number 4 September 1981 - Volume 1, Number 3 August 1981 - Volume 1, Number 2 July 1981 - Volume 1, Number 1 Learn about the MSRB Watch a video that tells our story..
Recommended publications
  • Employment and Unemployment in the First Half of 1981
    Employment and unemployment in the first half of 1981 Employment displayed sluggish growth as auto manufacturing failed to keep pace with other industries and homebuilding remained depressed; unemployment held close to the late 1980 levels DIANE N. WESTCOTT models before the Labor market signals became mixed as 1981 unfolded . rebuilding of inventories of 1981 During the first half of the year, total employment con- close of the model year. It is questionable, though, . auto sales will be tinued to show some signs of improvement from the re- whether this increase in U.S high and the cessionary declines of 1980. However, unemployment sustained; the cost of borrowing remains was reasonably stable, with the overall jobless rate at manufacturers' rebate program has ended. depressed in the first 7 .4 percent in each of the first two quarters of 1981, not The housing industry remained consistently high, and much different from the 7.5-percent rate in the last half half. Mortgage interest rates were lending institutions to of 1980. Although both the household and payroll em- the new forms of financing by reassure buy- ployment series' were moving upward, the pace of the make borrowing more feasible did little to interest rates have payroll series slowed to almost a trickle by the end of ers and home builders . Although only the housing in- the second quarter. climbed to new heights, thus far, Employment in 1980 had been curtailed largely as a dustry seems to have suffered unduly. result of job losses in manufacturing and construction Homebuilding, auto manufacturing still struggling -particularly in two key industries, automobile manu- nonfarm payroll employ- facturing and housing construction .
    [Show full text]
  • And Social Council
    AND LIMITED E/CEPAL/L.268/Add. 13 October 1982 SOCIAL COUNCIL ORIGINAL: ENGLISH C E P A L Economic Commission for Latin America ECONOMIC SURVEY OF LATIN AMERICA 1981 BAHAMAS This preliminary version of the Economic Survey of Latin America, 1981 is being distributed in the form of a general introduction, under the symbol E/CEPAL/L.268, and a number of addenda, each containing a study of the economic evolution of a country of the region. These studies will not be published in alphabetical order, but in order of completion. The final version of the complete Survey will be published once the observations regarding this preliminary version have been received. 82—4—829 Notes and explanation of symbols The following symbols have been used in the tables in this Survey: Three dots (...) indicate that data are not available or are not separately reported. A dash (—) indicates that the amounts is nil or negligible. A blank space in a table means that the item in question is not aplicable. A minus sign (-) indicates a deficit or decrease, unless otherwise indicated. A full stop (.) is used to indicate decimals. A slash (/) indicates a crop year or fiscal year, e.g., 1969/1970. Use of a hyphen (-) between years, e.g., 15)60-1970, signifies an annual average for the calendar years involved, including the beginning and the end years. References to "tons" mean metric tons, and to "dollars" United States dollars, unless otherwise stated. Unless otherwise stated, references to annual growth rates or rates of variation mean cumulative annual rates.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT of the COURT 10 January 1985 * in Case 229/83
    LECLERC / AU BLÉ VERT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 10 January 1985 * In Case 229/83 REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Cour d'Appel [Court of Appeal], Poitiers, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Association des Centres distributeurs Edouard Leclerc, Paris, SA Thouars distribution et autres, Sainte-Verge, and Sàrl 'Au blé vert', Thouars; Georges Lehec, Auxerre; SA Pelgrim, Thouars; Union syndicale des libraires de France, Paris; Ernest Marchand, Thouars; Jeanne Demée, née Palluault, Thouars, on the interpretation of Articles 3 (f) and 5 of the EEC Treaty, THE COURT composed of: Lord Mackenzie Stuart, President, G. Bosco and C. Kakouris, Presidents of Chambers, A. O'Keeffe, T. Koopmans, U. Everling, K. Bahlmann, Y. Galmot and R. Joliét, Judges, Advocate General: M. Darmon Registrar: J. A. Pompe, Deputy Registrar gives the following * Language of lhe Case: French. 17 JUDGMENT OF 10. 1. 1985 — CASE 229/83 JUDGMENT Facts and Issues The facts of the case, the course of the Where books published in France are re- procedure and the observations submitted imported, the retail selling price fixed by the pursuant to Article 20 of the Protocol on importer is to be no lower than that fixed by the Statute of the Court of Justice of the the publisher. EEC may be summarized as follows: Decree No 81-1068 of 3 December 1981 adopted in implementation of the above- mentioned law states that the principal 1. Facts and procedure distributor of the imported books, who as such must comply with the requirements of the Law of 21 June 1943, is deemed to be 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Supreme Court Survey - a Review of Decisions: June 1981-August 1981
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 9 Issue 3 Article 6 4-15-1982 The California Supreme Court Survey - A Review of Decisions: June 1981-August 1981 Craig H. Millet Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Craig H. Millet The California Supreme Court Survey - A Review of Decisions: June 1981-August 1981, 9 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 3 (1982) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol9/iss3/6 This Survey is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. The California Supreme Court Survey A Review of Decisions: June 1981-August 1981 In a continuing effort to provide the legal community with an analytical examina- tion of recent CaliforniaSupreme Court cases, the PepperdineLaw Review surveys the following decisions as indicative of currentcourt activity. The following is des- ignated to briefly expose the practitionerto recent decisions which are anticipated to significantly impact California law. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW A. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1. Specific Performance as a Remedy for Broken Plea Agreements: People v. Calloway ........... 680 2. Expanding Pre-TrialDiscovery: Holman v. Superior Court .................................... 698 3. Excessive Pre-TrialPublicity as it Affects the Right to a FairTrial: Martinez v. Superior Court ............................................. 700 4. Inquiry into the Use of Peremptory Challenges: People v. W illiams ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contrasting Study of the Rainfall Anomalies Between Central Tibet and Central India During the Summer Monsoon Season of 1979
    A Contrasting Study of the Rainfall Anomalies between Central Tibet and Central C. C. Chang1 India during the Summer Institute of Atmospheric Physics Monsoon Season of 1979 Academia Sinica, Beijing Abstract ratio thus computed is classified into four categories: Based on a comparison of rainfall anomalies between central India Weak monsoon day (W): 0 < r < 0.5 and central Tibet in July and August 1979, a negative correlation be- Normal monsoon day (N): 0.5 < r < 1.5 tween them is found. When an active monsoon prevailed over cen- Strong monsoon day (S): 1.5 < r < 4.0 tral India, a break monsoon occurred over central Tibet, and vice versa. The large-scale circulation conditions for an active Indian Vigorous monsoon day (V): r > 4.0 monsoon are characterized by the presence of a large area of nega- tive height departures over the Indian Peninsula and large areas of Thus, we have a uniform and consistent standard of classi- positive height departures over central Tibet. On the other hand, the fication for the monsoon rainfalls on both sides of the circulation conditions responsible for a break monsoon in India Himalayas. are characterized by frequent wave-trough activity over Tibet and the regions to the west of Tibet, and by a dominating high-pressure area over the Indian Peninsula. 2. Comparison of the rainfall anomalies between cen- tral India and central Tibet 1. Methods of analysis Figure 1 shows time series of the rainfall ratio of central India The rainfall data were taken from the Indian Daily Weather (r7) and central Tibet (rc) for July and August 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • 1980 Through 1985 Carolyn Wadsworth, MS, PT, OCS, CHT
    As Dreams Became Realities: 1980 through 1985 Carolyn Wadsworth, MS, PT, OCS, CHT The Orthopaedic Section is celebrating its 25th anniversary during 1999. The strength the Section now enjoys was made possible through the foresight and energy of a group of physical therapists of great purpose, vision, and organization acumen. Our 25th year seems an appropriate time at which to recount their efforts and to acquaint ourselves with the people, events, and initiatives that helped shape the Section in its first quarter century. This article is the second of a 4-part series depicting the Orthopaedic Section History. It covers the period from 1980 through 1985. Stanley Paris and Dorothy Santi eloquently described the events leading to the Section’s inception in the January issue of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Practice. They gave us fascinating insights into the challenges and victories that occurred during the 1970s, our Section’s formative years. We hardly knew an infancy! With membership doubling every 2 years between 1974 and 1979, we were off the growth chart of traditional human development. You could say that we hit the ground running. As the Orthopaedic Section embarked upon the 1980s, we faced the stark realization that we must assume responsibility for the institution we had created with our youthful energy and enthusiasm. We had come of age. Our founding leadership had tested the waters and established the Section as a significant component of the APTA. It was up to the next tier to devise a plan and guidelines for continuing to achieve our mission. How must be proceed? The Section was already widely recognized for its intensity, commitment, and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Features Volume 25 Number 7 August 1981
    MONTHLY TAX FEATURES Toward bolte r government Volume 25, Number 7, August 198 1 Founde d 1937 Tax Foundation, Incorporated 1875 Connecticut Avenue, N .W. q Washington, D.C. 20009 q 202-328-4500 q New "Facts & First Quarter Tax Index Tops 400 Figures" Gives Fiscal Profile of American As Size of Federal Tax Bite Climbs Economy The Tax Index passed anothe r In the first quarter of this year, th e "To find the right answer, it is firs t milestone in the first quarter of 1981 , Federal Tax Index reached 412 .2, up necessary to ask the right question, " topping the 400 mark (1967 = 100) from the previous quarter by 8 .3 per- observes Tax Foundation's Chairma n for the first time, according to Tax cent, or an annual rate of 37 .6 per- Thomas M. Macioce in his Foreword Foundation economists . The Index cent. At the same time, the State - to Facts and Figures on Government rose by 6 .8 percent from the fourt h Local Index rose by 3 .8 percent, or Finance, 21st biennial edition . He quarter of 1980 for a stunning 30 . 3 16.3 percent on an annual-rate basis , continues by pointing out that "in percent annual rate of increase. At a reaching 400.0 . matters of public finance and in the level of 408.2 in this year's firs t The major taxes contributing to th e tax and fiscal arena, those question s quarter, the Tax Index was almost 1 6 latest quarterly upsurge in the Index cannot be formulated without moun - percent higher than in the same pe- were Federal social security taxes tains of statistical data .
    [Show full text]
  • Dependence of Soviet Military Power on Economic Relations with the West
    _ No Objection To Declassification 2008/03/28: NLR-748-22-3-24-8 as seen MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SECRET ATTACHMENT November 21, 1981 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: RICHARD V. ALLE SUBJECT: CIA Special National Intelligence Estimate Attached is the Special National Intelligence Estimate which I mentioned in todays Daily Report. It is an extremely important assessment of the Soviet economy and Its ability to support its massive military build-up. I commend it to your attention. SECRET ATTACHMENT No Objection To Declassification 2008/03/28: NLR-748-22-3-24-8 Director of —SeeFet- Central Intelligence Dependence of Soviet Military Power on Economic Relations With the West Special National Intelligence Estimate Declassified and Approved for ReleaS0 by the Central Intelligence Agency Date: Z cro I Sccret SN1E 3/11-4-81 17 November 1981 Co" 285 Warning Notice Sensitive Intelligence Sources and Methods In ved (WNINTEL) • NATIONAL SECURITY NFOR ION Unauthorized Disclosure Subject to mdnal Sanctions DISSEMINATION CONTROL A REVIATIONS NOFORN— Not Releasable to eig' n Nationals NOCONTRACT— Not Releasable t Contractors or Contractor/ onsultonts PROM— Caution—Pr.. 'etary Information Involved NFIBONLY— NFIB 0 meats Only ORCON— Dissc:min on and Extraction of Information Con oiled by Originator REL. This fomaton Has Been Authorized for del:Ise to ... FGI— F eign Government Information OCRIVATIVE a ata- RellEW OH 17 H. 3001 DERIVED n1004 N.16(11. °fiche copy of this document is available from Regular MCC of NFAC reports in either microfiche or printed form can also be arr nged through OCO/IMD. wioritaliC4- SNIE 3/11-4-81 DEPENDENCE OF SOVIET MILITARY POWER ON ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH THE WEST Information available as of 17 November 1981 was used in the preparation of this Estimate.
    [Show full text]
  • International Review of the Red Cross
    NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 1981 TWENTY· FIRST YEAR - No. 225 international review• of the red cross PROPERTY OF U.S. ARMY lliE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAl'S SCHOOL INTER ARMA CARITAS LIBRARY GENEVA INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS FOUNDED IN 1863 INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS Mr. ALEXANDRE HAY, Lawyer, former Director-General of the Swiss National Bank, President (member since 1975) Mr. HARALD HUBER, Doctor of Laws, Federal Court Judge, Vice-President (1969) Mr. RICHARD PESTALOZZI, Doctor of Laws, Vice-President (1977) Mr. JEAN PICfET, Doctor of Laws, fonner Vice-President of the ICRC (1967) Mrs. DENISE BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, Doctor of Laws, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, Judge at the European Court of Human Rights (1967) Mr. MARCEL A. NAVILLE, Master of Arts, ICRC President from 1969 to 1973 (1967) Mr. JACQUES F. DE ROUGEMONT, Doctor of Medicine (1967) Mr. VICTOR H. UMBRICHT, Doctor of Laws, Managing Director (1970) Mr. GILBERT ETIENNE, Professor at the Graduate Institute of International Studies and at the Institut d'etudes du developpement, Geneva (1973) Mr. ULRICH MIDDENDORP, Doctor of Medicine, head of surgical department of the Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur (1973) Mrs. MARION BOvEE-ROTHENBACH, Doctor of Sociology (1973) Mr. HANS PETER TSCHUDI, Doctor of Laws, former Swiss Federal Councillor (1973) Mr. HENRY HUGUENIN. Banker (1974) Mr. JAKOB BURCKHARDT, Doctor of Laws, Minister Plenipotentiary (1975) Mr. THOMAS FLEINER, Master of Laws, Professor at the University of Fribourg (1975) Mr. ATHOS GALLINO, Doctor of Medicine, Mayor of Bellinzona (1977) Mr. ROBERT KOHLER, Master of Economics (1977) Mr. MAURICE AUBERT, Doctor of Laws, Banker (1979) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal No. 2262 - George K
    Appeal No. 2262 - George K. Sherman v. US - 31 August, 1981. ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES COAST GUARD vs. MERCHANT MARINER'S DOCUMENT and License No. 42066 Issued to: George K. Sherman Z-1166281 DECISION OF THE VICE COMMANDANT ON APPEAL UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 2262 George K. Sherman This appeal has been taken in accordance with Title 46, United States Code 239(g) and Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations 5.30-1. By order dated 30 June 1980, an Administrative Law Judge of the United States Coast Guard at Boston, Massachusetts, suspended Appellant's license and document for two months, upon finding him guilty of misconduct. The single specification found proved alleges that while serving as Master on board the United States M/V OCEAN PRINCE, O.N. 276461, under authority of the document and license above captioned, on or about 1545, on 10 March 1980, Appellant wrongfully failed to notify the nearest Marine Inspection Office as soon as possible of the collision of the Tank Barge HYGRADE 42, O.N. 515005 with the fender system of the Brightman Street Bridge in the Taunton River, causing damage in excess of fifteen hundred ($1500) dollars, as required by 46 CFR 4.05-1. The hearing was held at Providence, Rhode Island, on 25 March and 14 April 1980. At the hearing, Appellant was represented by professional counsel and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge and file:////hqsms-lawdb/users/KnowledgeManagementD...0&%20R%201980%20-%202279/2262%20-%20SHERMAN.htm (1 of 5) [02/10/2011 9:59:36 AM] Appeal No.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Astronomers Al
    0.2 dex in giants (Lambert and Ries, 1977, 1981; Kjaergaard et Visiting Astronomers al. , 1982). The effect of this correction is important only for a couple of the cooler population I stars. (October 1, 1984 to April 1, 1985) Fig. 2 and 3 give the [o/sc] and [O/Fe] ratios against the iran abundance; an additional star (HD 122563: Lambert et al. , Observing time has now been allocated for period 34 (Octobel' 1, 1984 to April 1, 1985). As usual, the demand for telescope time was 1974) having literature data is plotted in Fig. 2 as a triangle. much greater than the time actually available. Inspection of Fig. 2 und 3 reveals that metal pOOl' stars are The following list gives the names of the visiting astronomers, by Oxygen overabundant. However, this overabundance is less telescope and in chronological order. The complete list, with dates, than indicated by the previous works. Our result refers to a equipment and programme titles, is available from ESO-Garching. small sampie of stars. However, it may be considered as an evidence of a slight (0.3 dex) Oxygen overabundance in metal POOl' stars. 3.6 m Telescope References October 1984: Hunger/Heber/Drilling/Kudritzki, Alioin/D'Odorico/ Pelat, Dravins/Linde/Nordlund/FredgalGahm/Ay­ Clegg, R.E.S., Lambert, D.L., and Tomkin, J., 1981: Astrophysical res/Linsky/Simon, Eriksson/Saxner, Gratton/Orto­ Journal 250, 262. lani, Maurice/Lequeux/M. L. PrevotiL. Prevot, Cris­ Eggen, O.J., Lynden-Bell, D., and Sandage, A. R., 1962: Ap. J. 136, tiani, Moorwood/Cetty-Veron, Richter/Chiosi/Orto­ 748.
    [Show full text]