St. Johns/Lombard Plan: Appendix C
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
St. Johns/Lombard Plan Appendix C: Documents Under Separate Cover 1.1 Results of the Open House 2.1 Existing Conditions Report 2.2 Existing Conditions Report - Transportation 2.3 Existing Conditions Report - Economics 3.1 Neighborhood Walks Summary - graphic 3.2 Neighborhood Walks Summary - comments 4.1 Latino and Hmong Outreach Report 5.1 Urban Development Concept Report 6.1 Land Use Evaluation Report 6.2 Land Use Evaluation - Waterfront 7.1 Transportation Alternatives Evaluation City of Portland Bureau of Planning June 2004 St. Johns/Lombard Plan Citizen Responses Book 2 from the October 18, 2001 Open House and the Community Comment Survey Bureau of Planning City of Portland, Oregon March 2002 St. Johns/Lombard Plan Background Information Study Area Description The St. Johns/Lombard Plan area includes portions of four neighborhoods in North Portland: St. Johns, Friends of Cathedral Park, The Community Association of Portsmouth, and University Park. The plan area generally includes the St. Johns town center and the Lombard main street, between St. Johns and Columbia Park. Project Overview/Summary The St. Johns/Lombard Plan will be a guide to implement the community’s vision over the next twenty years. Essentially a framework for community growth and development, the plan will address many facets of livability such as land use, transportation, housing and recreation. The plan is guided by the city’s and the region’s plans and policies, which promote the efficient use of land through compact urban development. Both areas are envisioned as pedestrian- friendly places that provide a mix of shopping, entertainment, housing, service, and employment opportunities. A goal of the St. Johns/Lombard Plan is to enhance the livability of the area by identifying community needs and desires, public and private strategies, and actions that will improve existing and future conditions. Public meetings will be held at milestones throughout the process to inform and obtain feedback from members of the community. The plan will culminate in City Council adoption of planning strategies that will provide a vision for the future, a framework for evaluating and implementing public investments, and direction for private projects. For more information, contact the City of Portland Bureau of Planning, St. Johns/Lombard Plan, 1900 SW Fourth Avenue, Suite 4100, Portland, OR 97201. Telephone 503-823-7700 Fax 503-823-7800 TDD 503-823-6868 E-mail [email protected] 1 Contents This document is a compilation of information collected from the St. Johns/Lombard Open House and the Community Comment Survey. Citizen responses have been summarized. Following the summaries are actual responses – the responses have not been edited for content. A. Open House Citizen Responses . page 3 Open House Response Summaries . page 4 Complete List of Responses to Open House Questions . page 10 B. Community Comment Survey Summary . page 27 Raw Data from Community Comment Survey Responses . page 31 How will this information be used? The citizen responses recorded in this document will be used by staff and citizen volunteers during the plan process to help develop and refine policies, objectives, and implementation strategies for the plan area. 2 A. Open House Citizen Responses Contained in this section is a summary followed by a complete list of natural and recreational areas. Additionally, a station was set up for written comments by participants of the St. Johns/Lombard Plan open participants to discuss issues and to describe a future vision or wish for house, October 18, 2001, at Roosevelt High School. During the open the community. Questions and responses were displayed to allow house event, participants were asked to provide written responses to a participants to share ideas and learn about other perspectives. series of questions related to transportation, the built environment, and 3 Open House Response Summaries The following are summaries of the responses to the topic-area questions asked at the open house. Issues or themes are identified where multiple responses were similar in content. Where possible, the summary lists are presented in order of frequency of responses, with the most frequently mentioned responses listed first. See page 10 for a complete list of responses. 1. What do you consider to be the three most important transportation issues for St. Johns? 2. For Lombard Street? This chart shows the top three issues or themes that surfaced. Under each issue is a sampling of responses (a total of 75 were received). The first issue listed in each column was most frequently mentioned. Other topics mentioned include issues related to trucks, the bridge, parking, and the sidewalk environment. St. Johns Lombard Street Transportation Issues Transportation Issues 1. Traffic control 1. Traffic movement and circulation . “Unsafe as you head into downtown St. Johns area.” . .“Traffic is too fast . “Relieve auto traffic on Lombard . .”. “Current [signal] timing on on Lombard, Ivanhoe, and Princeton.” . “Traffic calming on N. Amherst.” Lombard is too short.” . “[We need] a one way couplet of Lombard and . .“Trucks must route away from town center and main street.” . Central from the railroad cut into St. Johns.” . 2. Transit 2. Traffic control . .“Express bus service [is needed] to downtown and Sunday service by . “Cars are travelling too fast on Lombard – they need to be slowed either the 17 or 40.” . “[We need] bus service to Pier Park Apartments . down!” . “Need speed bumps, trees, and boulevards so people don’t .” . “Extend service hours on bus line #16.” . “Need [bus] service assume all of St. Johns is part of the Portland Raceway.” . “We need length of Columbia Boulevard to assist employees.” . more traffic lights and curb extensions to slow down traffic.” . 3. Pedestrian Safety 3 Transit and pedestrian safety . “The intersection of Richmond and Ivanhoe is dangerous and . .“[I] would like to see a smoother mass transit system, easier access to impassable by pedestrians.” . “Less traffic, more pedestrian-friendly.” . bus/Max.”. “Street car service down Lombard.” . .“Better pedestrian “There needs to be a safe passage through the pedestrian district from the access to Willamette, along with a pedestrian-friendly downtown St. south and southwest to James John Elementary School. .” . Johns. Bring back the street lamps and slow down the traffic.” . Open House Summaries Continued 4 3. Question 3: Citizens were asked to provide general transportation issues and is not summarized here. See page 13 for a list of responses. 4. Question 4: Citizens were asked to identify transportation issues on a map of the area. See pages 13-14 for a list of responses to the map exercise. 5. What are your three most frequent destinations in St. Johns? 6. Along Lombard Street? The following two lists are organized in order of frequency of responses; the first destination of each list was mentioned most often (a total of 38 responses were received). St. Johns Lombard Street 1. St. Johns Cafe 1. Fred Meyer 2. St. Johns Library 2. US Bank 3. Safeway 3. Gas station 4. St. Johns Pub 4. Nicola’s Pizza & Pasta 5. Post Office 5. Ying Ying 6. St. Johns Hardware 6. Les Schwab Tire Center 7. Fred Meyer 7. Snooty Cats Café 8. Starbucks 8. Fishwife Restaurant 9. Cathedral Park 5 Open House Summaries Continued 7. Share your ideas on how to enhance the commercial areas of St. Johns and Lombard Street. This list is organized in order of frequency of responses; the first idea was mentioned most often (a total of 105 responses were received). 1. Better grocery store 3. Improve the sidewalk environment 9. Add mixed used developments (mixture of residential and commercial) 4. More quality restaurants 10. Rezone 5. Improve existing storefronts 11. More clothing stores 6. Fewer bars and adult businesses 12. Add decorative lighting 7. More book stores 13. Fewer auto-related businesses 8. Fill vacant storefronts 14. Restrict franchise growth 8. What do you like about the housing in this area? 9. What would you like to see changed? This chart shows the major issues or themes that surfaced in the responses. The two lists are organized in order of frequency of responses; the first issue of each list was most frequently mentioned (a total of 89 responses were received). Likes Desired Changes 1. Affordability 1. Design controls 2. Large lots 2. Rezone some industrial and commercial to allow for 3. Diversity in size, shape, age, cost residential 4. Old houses 3. Address nuisances (outdoor storage, trash, maintenance) 5. Most homes face the street 4. Less multidwelling residential 6. Conveniences to transportation system, downtown 5. Improve quality of construction 6. Limit rowhouses 6 Open House Summaries Continued 10. What do you see as the benefits of nearby industrial uses along the river? The following list is a sampling of responses (a total of 18 were received). For this question, no clear theme surfaced since each response was unique: • “Keeps trucks off the roads if you can export from industries to ships on the river.” • “[Provides] family wage jobs.” • “[Supplements the] tax base.” • “Makes for a ‘working town’ identity.” • “[Allows residents to] live close to work.” 11. Do you think existing vacant industrial sites should remain industrial? If not, what use(s) do you envision? This list is organized in order of frequency of responses; the first comment was the most frequently mentioned (a total of 30 responses were received). 1. Combination of recreation, open space, trails 2. Combination of housing