DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Freedom's Path At

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Freedom's Path At FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Freedom’s Path at Fort Harrison Project Prepared for: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs 810 Vermont Ave NW Washington, D.C. 20420 Prepared by: WESTECH Environmental Services, Inc. P.O. Box 6045 Helena, MT 59604 August 2017 Freedom’s Path at Fort Harrison i WESTECH Environmental Services, Inc. Final Environmental Assessment August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................ 3 2.1 Proposed Action ...................................................................................................... 4 2.2 No Action Alternative.............................................................................................. 4 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................ 4 3.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................ 5 3.1.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................. 5 3.1.2 No Action Alternative..................................................................................... 5 3.2 Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................. 6 3.2.2 No Action Alternative..................................................................................... 6 3.3 Noise ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.3.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................. 7 3.3.2 No Action Alternative..................................................................................... 7 3.4 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................. 7 3.4.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................. 8 3.4.2 No Action Alternative..................................................................................... 8 3.5 Geology and Soils .................................................................................................... 8 3.5.1 Proposed Action ............................................................................................. 9 3.5.2 No Action Alternative................................................................................... 10 3.6 Wildlife and Habitat .............................................................................................. 10 3.6.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 11 3.6.2 No Action Alternative................................................................................... 11 3.7 Wetlands and Floodplains .................................................................................... 11 3.7.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 12 3.7.2 No Action Alternative................................................................................... 12 3.8 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 13 3.8.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 13 3.8.2 No Action Alternative................................................................................... 15 3.9 Land Use ................................................................................................................ 15 3.9.1 Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 16 3.9.2 No Action Alternative................................................................................... 17 Freedom’s Path at Fort Harrison ii WESTECH Environmental Services, Inc. Final Environmental Assessment August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3.10 Socioeconomics .................................................................................................... 17 3.10.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 19 3.10.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................ 20 3.11 Community Services.............................................................................................. 20 3.11.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 20 3.11.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................ 20 3.12 Transportation and Parking .................................................................................. 20 3.12.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 21 3.12.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................ 21 3.13 Utilities .................................................................................................................. 22 3.13.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 22 3.13.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................ 22 3.14 Solid and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................. 22 3.14.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 23 3.14.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................ 24 3.15 Environmental Justice ........................................................................................... 24 3.15.1 Proposed Action ......................................................................................... 25 3.15.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................ 25 3.16 Potential for Generating Substantial Controversy................................................ 25 3.17 Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................................. 26 4.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................................... 26 5.0 MITIGATION ...................................................................................................................... 26 6.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 31 7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ........................................................................................................... 32 8.0 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................................ 33 APPENDICES Appendix A – Cultural Resources Construction Monitoring Plan Appendix B – Agency Correspondence FIGURES Figure 1 – Project Location ........................................................................................................... 35 Figure 2 – Project Layout and Features ........................................................................................ 36 Figure 3 – Water Resources and Floodplain Map ......................................................................... 37 Figure 4 – Former Historic Structures ........................................................................................... 38 Figure 5 – Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 39 Freedom’s Path at Fort Harrison iii WESTECH Environmental Services, Inc. Final Environmental Assessment August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) TABLES Table 1‐1 Historic Buildings Proposed for Renovation ................................................................... 2 Table 3‐1 Percent of Total Earnings in Basic Industries ‐ Lewis and Clark County, 2014‐2016 .... 18 Table 5‐1 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................... 27 Table 7‐1 List of Preparers ............................................................................................................ 32 Freedom’s Path at Fort Harrison iv WESTECH Environmental Services, Inc. Final Environmental Assessment August 2017 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ACP Asbestos Control Program ACUB Army Compatible Use Buffer ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ACM Asbestos Containing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carroll College Women and the Helena Earthquakes Of
    CARROLL COLLEGE WOMEN AND THE HELENA EARTHQUAKES OF 1935 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATION HONORS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY TREVOR BELNAP HELENA, MONTANA APRIL 2008 CORETTE LIBRARY >« » mi! EOF ,0* SIGNATURE PAGE This thesis for honors recognition has been approved for the Department of History by: Gillian Glaes, Ph.D, Director 5-/- oj Robert Swartout, Ph.D, Reader Copyright © 2008 by Trevor Belnap All rights reserved CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................................v PREFACE..............................................................................................................................vi INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: WOMEN’S ROLES IN DEPRESSION-ERA HELENA............................4 CHAPTER 2: EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN DURING TEH EARTHQUAKES........ 17 CHAPTER 3: WOMEN AND RECONSTRUCTION.................................................. 31 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................... 42 NOTES...................................................................................................................................45 BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................................................................................. 51 iv FIGURES 1. Saint Joseph’s Orphanage................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN, UPDATE 2012 Yellowstone County City of Billings City of Laurel Town of Broadview
    MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN, UPDATE 2012 Yellowstone County City of Billings City of Laurel Town of Broadview YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DISASTER AND EMERGENCY SERVICES 217 N. 27th Street PO Box 35004 Billings, Montana 59407 January 2012 Atkins Project #: 100013850 Yellowstone County Disaster and Emergency Services MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN, UPDATE 2012 Yellowstone County City of Billings City of Laureel Town of Broadview Prepared for: YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DISASTER AND EMERGENCY SERVICES 217 N 27th St PO Box 35004 Billings, MT 59407 Prepared by: Atkins 1120 Cedar St Missoula, MT 59801 Date: January 2012 Project #: 100013850 Atkins Multi-Jurisdiction PDM Plan, Update 2012 | 100013850 | January 2012 Yellowstone County Disaster and Emergency Services Table of contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... i PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Project Area Location, Land Use, Economy, Population ..................................................................2 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field Act and Its Effectiveness in Reducing Earthquake Damage
    State of California Alfred E. Alquist Seismic Safety Commission The Field Act and its Relative Effectiveness in Reducing Earthquake Damage in California Public Schools Appendices October 2009 1755 Creekside Oaks Drive, #100 Sacramento, California 95833 (916) 263-5506 www.seismic.ca.gov CSSC 09-02 i Table of Contents Page Appendix A: Synopsis of Research Methodology 1 Appendix B: Major 20th Century California Earthquakes 4 Appendix C: Counties that were Affected by California Earthquakes 5 Appendix D: School Sites that Experienced MMI VII or Greater Ground Shaking 6 Appendix E: Mapping of School Sites on Google Earth and Google Maps 18 Appendix F: History of Significant Building Code Changes 21 Appendix G: Comparison of Administrative Requirements of the Uniform 34 Building Code and the Field Act Appendix H: Performance of Field Act Structures as Compared to Non-Field 35 Act Structures in Significant California Earthquakes Since 1933 Appendix I: Description of the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale 45 Appendix J: ATC-20 Building Rating System 47 Appendix K: Significant U.S. Earthquakes Since 1933 Outside California 48 Appendix L: American Red Cross Designated Shelters in 23 California Counties 53 Appendix M: Bibliography of Literature Related to the Field Act 54 References 55 ii Appendix A: Synopsis of Research Methodology The objective of this study was to determine if the Field Act has been effective in reducing structural damage in public school buildings, including community colleges, as compared to comparable buildings constructed to non-Field Act standards. This effort was based on literature that has already been published; no primary data collection was intended to be part of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • COVER Page Data for Quaternary Faults in Western Montana
    COVER Page Data for Quaternary faults in western Montana by Kathleen M. Haller, Richard L. Dart, Michael N. Machette, and Michael C. Stickney CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 STRATEGY FOR DATA COMPILATION ............................................................................................................ 1 EXPLANATION OF PRIMARY DATA FIELDS................................................................................................... 2 HISTORICAL SEISMICITY.................................................................................................................................... 3 HEBGEN LAKE EARTHQUAKE..................................................................................................................................... 4 SYNOPSIS OF QUATERNARY FAULTING IN WESTERN MONTANA......................................................... 5 LIST OF CONTRIBUTING INDIVIDUALS .......................................................................................................... 7 DEFINITION OF DATABASE TERMS.................................................................................................................. 2 FAULT AND FOLD DATABASE ............................................................................................................................ 5 606, DEADMAN FAULT (CLASS A)............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. Vol. 49; No. 2, pp. 123-162 April, ]959 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Vol. 49 APRIL, 1959 No. 2 SEISMIC REGIONALIZATION By C. F. RICHTER ABSTRACT In the USSR earthquake risk is now officially mapped by division into areas numbered with the degrees of the Modified Mercalli intensity scale, to show maximum reasonably expectable intensity during future earthquakes on ground of the prevailing character. This paper presents and discusses maps on the same plan for the Los Angeles Basin and its vicinity, for California, and for the United States. The effect of variation of ground from point to point can be shown only on a large scale. This is microregionalization; the map for the Los Angeles Basin is an example. Small-scale regionaliza- tion maps require generalization. Prevailing ground is selected, not strictly by percentage of area, but by considering the foundation likely to be used for construction, in mountainous areas mostly small alluvial patches less stable than the surrounding rock. Regionalization and especially mieroregionalization can be used in construction and planning, as indicating maximum effects to be considered in designing permanent structures. In adjusting insurance rates, and in designing temporary structures, statistical frequency of occurrence is also involved. Over small areas, regionalization depends largely on local variation of ground and geology; over large areas, distance from active faults must be considered. Attention Should be given to the effect of structural trends and of wave path on the form of isoseismal curves. Mapping for the Los Angeles Basin area is reasonably definite.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic, Geophysical, and Seismic Characterization of the Luttrell Pit As a Mine-Waste Repository
    Geologic, Geophysical, and Seismic Characterization of the Luttrell Pit as a Mine-Waste Repository By Bruce D. Smith, Robert R. McDougal, and Karen Lund Chapter E3 of Integrated Investigations of Environmental Effects of Historical Mining in the Basin and Boulder Mining Districts, Boulder River Watershed, Jefferson County, Montana Edited by David A. Nimick, Stanley E. Church, and Susan E. Finger In cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Professional Paper 1652–E3 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ffrontChE3new.inddrontChE3new.indd ccdlxxvdlxxv 33/14/2005/14/2005 77:28:52:28:52 PPMM Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... 477 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 477 Purpose and Scope ......................................................................................................................... 478 Setting ............................................................................................................................................... 478 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 478 Geological Characterization ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Montana State University Historic District Gallatin, Montana Name of Property County and State United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic name: Montana State University Historic District Other names/site number: Montana State College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts, Agricultural College of the State of Montana, 24GA1893 (number for the entire district), 24GA0336, 24GA1629, 24GA1681, 24GA1763, 24GA1796-24GA1799, 24GA1865-24GA1892. Name of related multiple property listing: NA ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Roughly bounded by West College St., South 11th Ave., West Grant St., and South 6th Ave. City or town: Bozeman State: Montana County: Gallatin Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X__ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national _X_statewide _X_local Applicable National Register Criteria: _X_A ___B _X_C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic United States Eart
    Historic United States Earthquakes http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/states/historical_state.php#california Earthquake Hazards Program Historic United States Earthquakes Sorted by State & Date United States Earthquakes sorted by All earthquake dates are UTC, not local time. Date Magnitude Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Cascadia Subduction Zone • State & Date Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • State & Magnitude Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Largest by State Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Madrid • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • Worldwide Earthquakes North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South sorted by Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Date Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming Magnitude Alabama Magnitude 6.0 and Greater Country & Date 1916 10 18 - Irondale, Alabama - M 5.1 Country & Magnitude 2003 04 29 - Alabama - M 4.6 2004 08 19 - Alabama - M 3.6 Alaska 1899 09 04 - Cape Yakataga, Alaska - M 7.9 1899 09 10 - Yakutat Bay, Alaska - M 8.0 1899 09 23 - Copper River delta, Alaska - M 7.0 1900 10 09 - Kodiak Island, Alaska - M 7.7 1901 12 31 - Cook Inlet, Alaska - M 7.1 1904 08 27 - Fairbanks, Alaska - M 7.3 1908 05 15 - Gulf of Alaska - M 7.0 1910 09 09 - Rat Islands, Aleutian Islands, Alaska - M 7.0 1912 07 07 - Paxson, Alaska - M 7.2 1927 10
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Regulating Reservoir faults (Class A) No. 680 Last Review Date: 1993-04-23 Compiled in cooperation with the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology citation for this record: Machette, M.N., compiler, 1993, Fault number 680, Regulating Reservoir faults, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:04 PM. Synopsis Comprised of three, echelon, intrabasin, normal faults that trend northwest and lie between the Spokane Hills fault [679a] and the Spokane Bench fault [681]. Poorly studied, with the exception of a single trenching study for Regulating Reservoir. Name Found in trench excavations by M.W. Reynolds in 1975 (Schmidt, comments 1986 #533); later mapped by Schmidt (1986 #533) and Stickney (1987 #251). Johns and others (1982 #259) use the term Helena Regulating Reservoir fault for the locality of its discovery, although the term Regulating Reservoir is shown on local maps and thus accepted as the fault's name (Stickney and Bingler, 1981 #559). The fault consists of three echelon scarps that extend #559). The fault consists of three echelon scarps that extend across Spokane Bench. Fault ID: Refers to fault 122 (Helena Regulating Reservoir fault) of Johns and others (1982 #259) and Regulating Reservoir fault (Stickney and Bingler, 1981 #559; Stickney, 1987 #251; Stickney and Bartholomew, written commun.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Signatures of Earthquake Strain
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 98, NO. B12, PAGES 22,035-22,068, DECEMBER 10, 1993 Hydrological Signatures of Earthquake Strain ROBERT MUIR-WOOD EQE International, Clapton, England GEOFFREY C. P. KING Institut de Physique du Globe, Strasbourg, France The character of the hydrological changesthat follow major earthquakeshas been investigated and found to be dependenton the style of faulting. The most significantresponse is found to accompany major normal fault earthquakes.Increases in spring and river dischargespeak a few days after the earthquake, and typically, excess flow is sustained for a period of 6-12 months. In contrast, hydrological changesaccompanying pure reverse fault earthquakes are either undetected or indicate lowering of well levels and spring flows. Strike-slip and oblique-slip fault movements are associated with a mixture of responsesbut appear to release no more than 10% of the water volume of the same sized normal fault event. For two major normal fault earthquakesin the western United States (those of Hebgen Lake on August 17, 1959, and Borah Peak on October 28, 1983), there is suf•cient river flow information to allow the magnitude and extent of the postseismic discharge to be quantified. The dischargehas been converted to a rainfall equivalent, which is found to exceed 100 mm close to the fault and to remain above 10 mm at distancesgreater than 50 km. The total volume of water released in theseearthquakes was around 0.3 km3 (BorahPeak) and 0.5 km3 (HebgenLake). Qualitative information on other major normal fault earthquakes, in both the western United States and Italy, indicates that the size, duration, and range of their hydrological signatureshave been similar.
    [Show full text]
  • MSU Historic District 2013
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Montana State University Historic District Gallatin, Montana Name of Property County and State United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic name: Montana State University Historic District Other names/site number: Montana State College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts, Agricultural College of the State of Montana, 24GA1893 (number for the entire district), 24GA0336, 24GA1629, 24GA1681, 24GA1763, 24GA1796-24GA1799, 24GA1865-24GA1892. Name of related multiple property listing: NA ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Roughly bounded by West College St., South 11th Ave., West Grant St., and South 6th Ave. City or town: Bozeman State: Montana County: Gallatin Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X__ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national _X_statewide _X_local Applicable National Register Criteria: _X_A ___B _X_C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Disasters
    ENCYCLOPEDIA OF DISASTERS Environmental Catastrophes and Human Tragedies VOLUME 1 ANGUS M. GUNN GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London 11-07-07 08:42:13GUNN$$FM1U Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Gunn, Angus M. (Angus Macleod), 1920– Encyclopedia of disasters : environmental catastrophes and human tragedies / Angus M. Gunn. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978–0–313–34002–4 ((set) : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978–0–313–34003–1 ((vol 1) : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978–0–313–34004–8 ((vol 2) : alk. paper) 1. Natural disasters—Encyclopedias. I. Title. GB5014.G86 2008 904—dc22 2007031001 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright 2008 by Angus M. Gunn All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2007031001 ISBN-13: 978–0–313–34002–4 (set) 978–0–313–34003–1 (vol 1) 978–0–313–34004–8 (vol 2) First published in 2008 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 11-07-07 08:42:13GUNN$$FM1U Contents Credits for Illustrations xi Guide to Thematic Entries xvii Preface xxiii Acknowledgments xxvii Introduction xxix Volume 1 1. Supervolcano Toba, Indonesia, 74000 BC 1 2. Rome, Italy, fire, 64 5 3. Pompeii, Italy, volcanic eruption, 79 11 4.
    [Show full text]