From Homer to Helen Keller: a Social and Educational Study of the Blind
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AmericanFoundation ForTHEBLIND inc. 15 WEST 16th STREET NEW YORK, N. Y* 10011. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/fromhomertohelenOOrich FROM HOMER TO HELEN KELLER ; . •/3 ^p ' ; K^^-.^gg^aBiHa " ' € ] ^ "' -*" &;J ., ^4f ' tSi»m* ' V W If yt&jT '. iii. *$ ***Jr * A ' im . .. : rail BHL Courtesy of Encyclopaedia Britannica. •m Historians' History of the World. Homer FROM HOMER TO HELEN KELLER A Social and Educational Study of the Blind by RICHARD SLAYTON FRENCH, Ph.D. Principal, California School for the Blind; Lec- turer in Education, University of California NEW YORK, 1932 AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND, INC. 125 EAST 46TH STREET Copyright, 1932, by the American Foundation for the Blind, Inc. 1 H^r THESE PAGES ARE DEDICATED TO MY WIFE whose self-sacrificing devo- tion has made possible the completion of the studies here presented. Preface studies here presented in revised and enlarged THEform were first printed in two parts, in March, 1924, and February, 1925, under a title no longer fitting. Many friends and critics almost immedi- ately urged publication of a new and revised edition in more suitable type and binding. After seeing how great a demand there was for the copies as originally printed, the writer became convinced that an enlarged and somewhat popularized edition was really in demand, and after a talk with Robert B. Irwin, Executive Director of the American Foundation for the Blind, New York City, he began the recasting and revision of materials with a view to early pub- lication. Much in the earlier studies was found to have such permanent value that it has been included with only slight alteration. Other parts are wholly rewritten, with the addition of material unavailable at the first writing. The earliest interest of the writer arose when, as a novice teacher of the blind in the year 1907, he turned for help, in vain, to the literature then extant in English and found chiefly controversial pamphlets and biographical studies, mostly "opinion" with little or no science, much of it interesting enough in its way but practically useless. Copies of Mell's Encyklopddisches Handbuch des Blinden- wesens and Heller's Studien zur Blindenpsychologie brought the first gleams of light into a dark subject, and a prema- ture ambition arose to make at least the substance of these great works available to readers of English. Eleven years passed, with experience in both a school for the blind and in public high schools, when the opportunity came to com- plete studies always kept in mind but temporarily side- viii Preface tracked by pressure of duties. Largely through the kindly encouragement of Alexis F. Lange, late Dean of the School of Education of the University of California, and William W. Kemp, present Dean, the studies took book form, and then their publication was made possible through the gen- erous cooperation of Dr. William A. Caldwell, at that time Principal of the California School for the Deaf. The present revision would not have been undertaken had it not been for the interest of certain officers of the American Foundation for the Blind. It is to them, there- fore, and to Mr. Irwin in particular, that I am indebted for the opportunity of offering these studies to our pro- fession and to such laymen as may be interested. I trust that in this new and less mutilated form they will prove more attractive. In connection with the printing of this work I desire to express special thanks to Eber L. Palmer and to Margaret H. Jacobsen of the American Foundation for the Blind. They have been untiring in their efforts to produce a real book and whatever is excellent in the way of typography and make-up is due to their energy and good judgment. I trust, also, that those who read will forgive passages that seem overfrank, even a bit harsh. It is my conviction that nothing is gained by mincing words or calling spades by more attractive names. My expression is as frank as my studies have been thorough and painstaking; and a glance at the Bibliography will show how exhaustive (and exhausting for the writer) my searches have been, a great part of them in German and French/ Through twenty-four years I have worked over the available material, running down original sources, sometimes through the most ob- scure references, and checking every alleged fact by getting at the nearest possible approach to the most reliable source. Errors these studies undoubtedly contain but not the errors Preface ix of careless or uncritical acceptance of loosely written sec- ondary sources or of failure to observe the canons of criti- cal historical research. Facts have been stated rather baldly as facts, surmises as such, and reams of irrelevant material consigned to the waste-basket. Most recently I have carefully gone through Herr Kretschmer's excellent Geschichte des Blindenwesens and, with such verifications as were possible, used the substance of some of his earlier chapters, together with my older sources, in Chapters I to III of Part I. Some more recent publications have so little influenced the work either in parts or as a whole, that I have felt their inclusion in the Bibliography unjustifiable, as it is strictly a Bibliography of works actually consulted and used—sometimes by way of rejection!—in the preparation of these studies. I am vitally indebted to Dr. Edward E. Allen, Director Emeritus, Perkins Institution and Massachusetts School for the Blind, Watertown, Massachusetts, for constant encour- agement and constructive criticism. I am similarly indebted to Dr. Olin H. Burritt, Principal, Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the Blind, Overbrook, Pennsylvania. I have previously indicated my indebtedness to Dean Wil- liam W. Kemp. Last but far from least, I owe much to my secretary, Mrs. Marie M. Clisham, for work on previous manuscripts, and to my wife for both the preparation of the original manuscript copies and the final preparation of the manuscript of this revision. Just a word is due in regard to the title, From Homer to Helen Keller. Homer stands for the greatest achieve- ment of the blind in the times antecedent to their system- atic education. He stands for all those bards, many of them blind or blinded, creators of literature and makers of our language, who through ballads, always of great vigor and sometimes of surpassing beauty, have handed down to x Preface us the glorious traditions of far-off heroic times. Miss Keller stands for the supreme achievement of education. The blind claim her, but the deaf can claim her, too, and modern education can claim her more than either—and all humanity claims her with the best claim of all. For she is the epitome of all that is best in humanity, all that is most spiritual; and all this through conscious aim and di- rected effort, through education in its best sense. Berkeley, California January 75, 1932. — Contents CHAPTER PAGE Preface vii Introduction: Definitions and General Survey 3 Definitions and delimitations, 3-8; loss in volume of im- pressions, 8-9; orientation, 9; vicariate of the senses, 1/^-12; increased attentiveness, 12-13; timidity, ^13-14; sedentary habits, 14-15; introversion, 15-16; moral tone, 16-17; ingratitude, 17-18; moral reactions, ; 18; lowered vitality, 18-19; awkwardness, 19-20; "blind- isms," 21; social reactions, 21-22; beggary, 22-23; ex- ploitation of girls, 23 ; education vs. charity, 24-25; s problems of education, 25-26; summary, 26-27. PART I. CHIEFLY HISTORICAL I. The Blind in Ancient and Medieval Times 31 Blindness prevalent in primitive and ancient societies, 31-32; remedies unscientific, 32; exposure checked by growing humaneness, 32-34; care of blind by Hebrews, etc., 34-41; Christian charities, 41-45; the blind in the cloisters, 45-46; hospital brotherhoods, the Quinze- Vingts, 46-50; the brotherhood of Palermo, 50-51; transition to state charities, 51-57. II. Gropings Toward the Light 58 Efforts of blind to help themselves generally resulted in beggary, 58-59; sad condition of beggars, 60-61; beggar guilds, 61-62; beggar tricks, 62-63; bards and minstrels, 63-66; cases of famous blind persons Didymus, 66-67; Saunderson, 67-68; Metcalf, 68-69; Jacob of Netra, 69-70; Maria Theresia von Paradis, 70-71 ; early attempts to educate the blind, 71-74. III. Valentin Hauy and the First School for the Blind 75 Theoretical basis of Haiiy's work, Locke and Diderot, 75-78; founding of first school for blind in keeping with spirit of the times, 78-79; Haiiy's awakening, 79-81; inspiration of Hauy by De l'Epee, 81-82; in- xii Contents PAGE fluence of Maria Theresia von Paradis, 82; the first pupils, 82-83 >' invention of embossing, 83 ; exhibitions and founding of school, 83-86; Hauy's Essai, 86-87; Hauy and the school studies, 87-89; music and indus- trial training, 89-90; Hauy's work unscientific, 90; fortunes of the Institution Nationale, 90-93; Hauy defended, 93-94; downfall of Hauy, 94; his weaknesses and his success, 94-97. IV. Early Schools of England and Germany 98 Early schools for the blind in Great Britain, 98-100; Klein in Vienna, 100-103; Hauy at Berlin and St. Petersburg, 103-105; Howe's report on European schools, 105-108. V. Early Phases of the Education of the Blind in America 109 Agitation for schools for the blind in America, 109- 110; Fisher in Boston, 110-111; incorporation of Bos- ton school, m-113; Samuel Gridley Howe assumes command, 113-115; the first Boston school, 115-116; raising funds, the Perkins endowment, 116; Howe as educator, 116-119; growth of school, 1 19-120; Howe's other activities, 120-121 ; New York and Pennsylvania, 121-122; founding of other institutions, 122-124.