DOCSLIB.ORG

1 University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: Special Collection Title: British Union Collection Scop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: Special Collection Title: British Union Collection Scop University of Sheffield Library. Special Collections and Archives Ref: Special Collection Title: British Union Collection Scope: A collection of documents, published and unpublished, relating to the political movements associated with Sir Oswald Mosley - the New Party, the British Union of Fascists (later called the British Union of Fascists and National Socialists, or British Union), and the Union Movement, from the mid-1920s. Dates: c. 1925 onwards Extent: 22 boxes Administrative / biographical history: This Collection has been assembled as support for both research and teaching at the University of Sheffield, principally within the Department of History, on political movements in 20th century Britain. It began with the acquisition of complete sets of The Fascist Quarterly and The British Union Quarterly. Other items, including journals such as Action, The Blackshirt, and Union, and unpublished memoirs of former members of the British Union, together with other related material, have gradually been added. Oswald Ernald Mosley (Sir Oswald on succeeding to the baronetcy as 6th Baronet in 1928) was born into a landed family of Rolleston, Staffordshire in 1896, his father being Sir Oswald Mosley, 5th Bart. After leaving Winchester School at the age of 16 he entered Sandhurst, and following the outbreak of the First World War was commissioned into the 16th Queen’s Light Dragoons, but then applied to join the Royal Flying Corps and was posted to the Front. Back in England to take his pilot’s certificate his leg was injured in a flying accident. He was recalled to his former regiment, but his damaged leg was affected by conditions in the trenches, and he was invalided out of the war in 1916. An able though controversial figure and a powerful orator, long considered by both supporters and opponents as someone capable of holding high political office, Mosley’s political career began in 1918 in a conventional way when he was selected as Unionist candidate for Harrow, and on election entered the National party coalition led by Lloyd George. His sympathy for the ordinary man who had fought so bravely in the trenches, concern for social objectives and dismay at governmental waste of money led him increasingly towards Liberal doctrines, and in November 1920 his condemnation in the House of Commons of Black and Tan atrocities in Ireland led to his crossing the floor to sit with the Liberals. His political career was to be strongly supported until her death in May 1933 by his wife Cynthia, daughter of Foreign Secretary Lord Curzon, whom he had married earlier that year and who became an M.P. in her own right. When in 1924 Ramsay MacDonald became the first Labour Party Prime Minister Mosley joined Labour as a member of the Independent Labour Party. At the subsequent election in Ladywood, Birmingham, he stood against the prominent Conservative Neville Chamberlain, being defeated by only 77 votes on a recount, and in 1926 he was selected as candidate for Smethwick, winning the subsequent election on a landslide. As unemployment rose steeply at the end of the decade, increased massively by the Depression which followed the Wall Street stock-market crash of 1 1929, Mosley, as Unemployment Minister, issued his ‘Mosley Memorandum’, which argued for the combatting of unemployment by spending money on public works, and on its rejection by the Cabinet resigned from the Government. In 1931 Mosley, supported by Labour dissidents, and with the use of £50,000 donated by Lord Nuffield, formed the New Party as an attempt to address the failings of the old political parties. The first by-election in May 1931 produced a creditable vote, but by splitting the non-Tory vote the New Party attracted Labour hostility when the Conservatives took the seat. Following consequent trouble at his meetings Mosley began to develop the use of stewards, and confrontations at meetings led to a loss of electoral support, and in 1932 the New Party was closed down. Mosley was increasingly drawn to the perceived success of Italian Fascism in solving the serious social and economic problems of the time, in contrast to the seeming lack of purpose of the democratic multi-party system, visiting Rome and meeting Mussolini. In October 1932 the British Union of Fascists was formally launched, a party organised on military lines intended to reflect both the discipline and comradeship of the Armed forces experienced by Mosley in the Great War. The new movement met with initial success and by 1934 had attracted some 40,000 members, in addition to many thousands well disposed to it. But a large meeting at Olympia on the 7th of June 1934 met with concerted disruption, and the ensuing violence caused a significant reaction against the B.U.F. Organised opposition came initially mainly from Communists, bitter rivals of Fascism in the struggle to create a new world political order, and from Jewish groups determined to prevent Britain following German Nazism’s strongly anti-semitic path. Increasingly, opposition attracted others who feared the threat to democratic freedoms posed by Fascism. The obvious visual parallels with the oppressive Nazi régime (blackshirt uniform, parades, the fascist salute, etc.) led to growing hostility and attempts to disrupt meetings. Although the party developed strengths in certain areas up to 1936 - the textile areas of Lancashire and Yorkshire, rural areas suffering from agricultural depression, and the East End of London where anti-semitism often underlay support - it failed ultimately to develop as a serious political force on the national scale. The extent of Mosley’s personal responsibility for deliberately encouraging anti-semitism, which existed as a ‘background’ feature in areas of British society at that time, and with which British Union became associated as a movement, is a matter of continuing controversy. Disorder continued to characterise some of the meetings, though often they passed off peacefully, and organised hostility on the streets culminated in the ‘Battle of Cable Street’ in London on October 4th 1936 when the police were unable to clear a way through a large crowd of anti-fascist demonstrators for a planned march through the East End. At this time Mosley married Lady Diana Mosley (the divorced Diana Guinness and one of the Mitford sisters) in Berlin, where Hitler attended the luncheon given by Frau Goebbels. At the end of that year the Public Order Act banned the wearing in public of uniform by members of political movements, and in March 1937 the party was plunged into a financial crisis during which many Headquarters staff, including William Joyce and John Beckett, were dismissed. The ominous growth of German military power and the growing likelihood of war fuelled hostility towards the British Union, which campaigned to keep Britain out of a European war, yet a Peace Rally which it held at Earl’s Court in July 1939 attracted an estimated 20,000 supporters. Though war with Germany broke out in September 1939 the British Union, in common with pacifist and left-wing groups, was able to continue its campaign against the war policy as before. However, following the fall of France and the invasion crisis of May 1940 Defence Regulations 18B and then 18B (1A) were passed through Parliament by the Government, resulting in many leading British Union members, including Mosley and his wife, being arrested and interned without charge or trial on the grounds that they might potentially act as 2 a Fifth Column of the enemy, an event regarded by those concerned as a slur on their often- expressed loyalty to the British state and crown. This episode, though it had in the dangerous circumstances of the time widespread public support, was one of major civil rights significance as it involved the imprisonment of individuals who had broken no law, and, as Churchill came to recognise, could be justified only in the most extreme circumstances. As the danger of invasion receded detainees were gradually released, and in November 1943 Mosley also was released from prison and placed under house arrest. From 1945 to 1947 Mosley passed his time in farming in Wiltshire, but in February 1948, following the publication of his book “The Alternative”, he relaunched his political career as leader of the new Union Movement, campaigning on the slogan “Europe a Nation”. The future would lie in cooperation between European peoples, coming together in a European nation-state, whilst colonies in Africa would be exploited to provide the food and other resources which Europe lacked. This policy contrasted with the programme of decolonisation which the post-war Labour Government was determined to promote. In his post-war movement Mosley renounced publicly both Nationalism and Anti-Semitism, whilst still predicting the collapse of Capitalism and the coming fight against Communism. The new party was much less militaristic in organisation than its predecessor, and repudiated the term ‘fascist’ as a description of its political identity. However, the climate of deep hostility to Fascism which the war, widely regarded in Britain as a crusade to preserve democratic freedoms and humane values, had engendered, ensured that the new movement never achieved the level of success of its predecessor. As immigration from the West Indies began to rise substantially Mosley declared the Union Movement against such immigration, and though this policy gained some temporary support further controversy and hostility developed. In 1953 he founded “The European” journal (which lasted until 1959),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reading Nicholas Mosley Context N°14 SIGN up for MONTHLY by Shiva Rahbaran NEWSLETTER
    » Navigate (http://www.dalkeyarchive.com/) » Navigate Reading Nicholas Mosley Context N°14 SIGN UP FOR MONTHLY by Shiva Rahbaran NEWSLETTER “People are trapped in their characteristics. They act parts. If you see that, then part of you has a certain degree of freedom.” Email Address* This is how Nicholas Mosley, in an interview in the Independent with D. J. Taylor (who saw Mosley as “a novelist who is about as unfashionable as it is possible to be”), summed up his long literary career. His critics, both those who admire and those who dislike his work, almost unanimously agree that the “unpopularity” of Mosley in England lies precisely in his endeavor to First Name dramatize an “Idea.” The position of Mosley in contemporary British fiction is well observed by John Naughton in the Listener: Given that the British are inclined to regard abstract theorizing on the human condition as a kind of disease, Mr. Mosley had Last Name better resign himself to charges of pretentiousness—an intellectual vice which is tolerated in foreigners but abhorred in natives. Mr. John Berger has had to live with such criticism in his time—which is perhaps why he now lives happily in the Alps. Address or Location* In England the tag “novel of ideas” is often associated with “unreadability.” “Novel of ideas” is seen as a novel in which ideas, instead of the protagonists, are the “real” characters; thus they are considered uninteresting and inaccessible. When Allan Massie (in his review of Children of Darkness and Light in the Scotsman), an admirer of Mosley, calls Mosley’s main concern “philosophical,” he actually contributes to the unpopularity of Mosley: * = required field Preferred Format [Mosley’s] interests are primarily philosophical.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Pictures the Pinter Screenplays
    Joanne Klein Making Pictures The Pinter Screenplays MAKING PICTURES The Pinter Screenplays by Joanne Klein Making Pictures: The Pinter Screenplays Ohio State University Press: Columbus Extracts from F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Last Tycoon. Copyright 1941 Charles Scribner's Sons; copyright renewed. Reprinted with the permission of Charles Scribner's Sons. Extracts from John Fowles, The French Lieutenant's Woman. Copyright © 1969 by John Fowles. By permission of Little, Brown and Company. Extracts from Harold Pinter, The French Lieutenant's Woman: A Screenplay. Copyright © 1982 by United Artists Corporation and Copyright © 1982 by J. R. Fowles, Ltd. Extracts from L. P. Hartley, The Go-Between. Copyright © 1954 and 1981 by L. P. Hartley. Reprinted with permission of Stein and Day Publishers. Extracts from Penelope Mortimer, The Pumpkin Eater. © 1963 by Penelope Mortimer. Reprinted by permission of the Harold Matson Company, Inc. Extracts from Nicholas Mosley, Accident. Copyright © 1965 by Nicholas Mosley. Reprinted by permission of Hodder and Stoughton Limited. Copyright © 1985 by the Ohio State University Press All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Klein, Joanne, 1949­ Making pictures. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Pinter, Harold, 1930- —Moving-picture plays. I. Title. PR6066.I53Z713 1985 822'.914 85-326 Cloth: ISBN 0-8142-0378-7 Paper: ISBN 0-8142-0400-7 for William I. Oliver Contents Acknowledgments ix Chronology of Pinter's Writing for Stage and Screen xi 1. Media 1 2. The Servant 9 3. The Pumpkin Eater 27 4. The Quiller Memorandum 42 5. Accident 50 6. The Go-Between 77 1. The Proust Screenplay 103 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Isdap Electoral Breakthrough
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1976 The evelopmeD nt and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Nsdap Electoral Breakthrough. Thomas Wiles Arafe Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Arafe, Thomas Wiles Jr, "The eD velopment and Character of the Nazi Political Machine, 1928-1930, and the Nsdap Electoral Breakthrough." (1976). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2909. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2909 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. « The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing pega(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Unravelling Britain’ 1 Module Handbook
    HST4308 ‘Unravelling Britain’ 1 Module Handbook School of History HST 4308 UNRAVELLING BRITAIN: BRITISH HISTORY SINCE 1801 Course Handbook 2015-2016 Course Organiser Dr Robert Saunders [email protected] HST4308 ‘Unravelling Britain’ 2 Module Handbook Table of Contents 1. Names and Contacts 4 2. Overview of the Course 2.1 Course Descriptions and Essentials 5 2.2 Textbooks and General Reading 8 2.3 Libraries and Qmplus 10 2.4 Assessments and Deadlines 11 2.5 Resources for Improving Writing 14 3. Course Content 3.1 Programme of Lectures and Seminars 16 3.2 Seminar Preparation 18 3.3 Seminars and Seminar Questions: Programme for the Year Semester 1 19 Semester 2 32 4. Coursework and Examinations 4.1 Assessment One: Primary Source Analysis 44 4.2 Assessment Two: Essay Questions and Bibliographies 45 4.3 Assessment Three: Primary Source Analysis 50 4.4 Assessment Four: Essay Questions and Bibliographies 51 4.5 Past Examination Papers 58 5. Study Notes and Guidance 5.1 Study Notes: Handy Hints 59 5.2 How to Analyse a Primary Source 64 HST4308 ‘Unravelling Britain’ 3 Module Handbook 5.3 How to Write an Essay 67 5.4 Revision Guide 71 5.5 Footnotes and Bibliographies: A Guide 73 6. Assessment Criteria 76 HST4308 ‘Unravelling Britain’ 4 Module Handbook 1. NAMES AND CONTACTS Course Organiser: Dr Robert Saunders Email: [email protected] Office 3.04 (Arts Two) Seminar Tutors: Dr Morgan Daniels Email: [email protected] Kerrie Holloway Email: [email protected] Rafaelle Nicholson Email: [email protected] Dr Eleanor O’Keeffe Email: [email protected] Dr Jade Shepherd Email: [email protected] Paul Sims Email: [email protected] HST4308 ‘Unravelling Britain’ 5 Module Handbook 2.1 COURSE DESCRIPTION AND ESSENTIALS Over the last two centuries, Britain has changed beyond recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.Thc sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Pagc(s}". If it was possible to obtain the missing pagc(s) or section, they arc spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed cither blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame* If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Objectification Within Individual Identity
    THE DYNAMICS OF OBJECTIFICATION WITHIN INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY by Nicholas Caggiano B.S.Ed. (Clarion University of Pennsylvania) 2009 Portfolio Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HUMANITIES in the GRADUATE SCHOOL of HOOD COLLEGE August 2020 Accepted: ________________________ ________________________ Corey Campion, Ph.D. Corey Campion, Ph.D. Committee Member Program Director ________________________ Didier Course, Ph.D. Committee Member ________________________ April M. Boulton, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School ________________________ Karen Hoffman, Ph.D. Portfolio Advisor 1 Introduction The construction of an individual’s identity is determined by a variety of factors. Each component serves as a puzzle piece in the ultimate construction of the total individual and helps determine whether and how an individual fits into their community. Being seen by others in a particular way can help construct and fortify an individual’s sense of belonging. But it can also lead to a feeling of being an outsider and not belonging. This can create a feeling of “otherness” within the individual, where they question not only their role within society but their sense of identity and agency and their value as subjects. However, even if being perceived as other or as an object can be negative, it can also be advantageous. In the portfolio that follows I demonstrate why that is the case. I begin by examining Jean-Paul Sartre’s view of how being seen as both subject and object is significant in individuals’ perceptions of each other. I then connect that to Michel Foucault’s discussion of Panopticism, which raises questions about another way of being seen, namely by an entity that is not seen in return.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Impact of Falling Agricultural Prices and the Looming Prospect Of
    CHAPTER SIX `BARLEY AND PEACE': THE BRITISH UNION OF FASCISTS IN NORFOLK, SUFFOLK AND ESSEX, 1938-1940 1. Introduction The local impact of falling agricultural prices and the looming prospectof war with Germany dominated Blackshirt political activity in Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex from 1938. Growing resentment within the East Anglian farming community at diminishing returns for barley and the government's agricultural policy offered the B. U. F. its most promising opportunity to garner rural support in the eastern counties since the `tithe war' of 1933-1934. Furthermore, deteriorating Anglo-German relations induced the Blackshirt movement to embark on a high-profile `Peace Campaign', initially to avert war, and, then, after 3 September 1939, to negotiate a settlement to end hostilities. As part of the Blackshirts' national peace drive, B. U. F. Districts in the area pursued a range of propaganda activities, which were designed to mobilise local anti-war sentiment. Once again though, the conjunctural occurrence of a range of critical external and internal constraints thwarted B. U. F. efforts to open up political space in the region on a `barley and peace' platform. 2. The B. U. F., the `Barley Crisis' and the Farmers' March, 1938-1939 In the second half of 1938, falling agricultural prices provoked a fresh wave of rural agitation in the eastern counties. Although the Ministry of Agriculture's price index recorded a small overall reduction from 89.0 to 87.5 during 1937-1938, cereals due heavy from 1938 and farm crops were particularly affected to the yields the harvests. ' Compared with 1937 levels, wheat prices (excluding the subsidy) dropped by fourteen 2 Malting barley, by 35 per cent, barley by 23 per cent, and oats per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Anti-Fascist Novels Written by Women in the 1930S
    Narratives of collaboration and resistance: Three anti-fascist novels written by women in the 1930s RONALD PAUL University of Gothenburg Abstract Throughout the 1930s, the impact of fascism on the role of women in society and in the family was the focus of several anti-fascist novels written by women. In this article I concentrate on three of the most significant and successful of these works in order to explore the way they dramatize the relationship between collaboration with and resistance to fascism. I show how they not only viewed the reactionary transformation of the state by fascist regimes as a historic defeat for women. They also sought to depict the effect this catastrophe had on their personal lives and how they coped with its social and political challenges. I have therefore selected the following novels – Storm Jameson’s In the Second Year (1936), Murray Constantine’s (Katharine Burdekin) Swastika Night (1937) and Phyllis Bottome’s The Mortal Storm (1938), since they address the fundamentally regressive nature of fascism in different ways as well as individual struggles against it. Moreover, they remain outstanding examples of anti-fascist fiction that still resonate with us today when the world is once more faced with the rise of rightwing, populist and neofascist parties. Key words: Storm Jameson, Murray Constantine, Phyllis Bottome, 1930s, Anti-fascist novels In one of her last great polemics, Three Guineas, published in 1938, Virginia Woolf argued for a united front between the women’s movement and the anti-fascist struggle. Woolf showed that there is a natural and necessary correspondence between the continued fight for female emancipation and international resistance to the rise of fascism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fascist Movement in Britain
    Robert Benewick THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IN BRITAIN Allen Lane The Penguin Press JLE 14- Ie 1 Contents Copyright © Robert Benewick, 1969 and 1972 Preface to Revised Edition 7 First published in 1969 under the title Acknowledgements 10 Po/iJi,a/ Vio/en,e anti Pub/i, Ortler 1. II This revised edition first published in 1972 The Political Setting Allen Lane The Penguin Press 1.. Precursors 1.1. 74 Grosvenor Street, London WI 3· Portrait oja Leader 5I ISBN 0 7139 034 1 4 4. The New Party 73 Printed offset litho in Great Britain by 5. From Party to Mcvement 85 Cox & Wyman Ltd 6. Leaders and Followers 108 London, Fakenham and Reading 1.,u f'i.~, 7. British Fascist Ideology 131. G d ~ - • F. Set In Monotype aramon ~ ~~ '" .~ 8. OlYmpia 169 9· Disenchantment and Disorder 193 ~~ : 10. The East London Campaign 1.17 .,.~ \ .. ''''' lem ~ -<:.­. ~~ I 1. The Public Order Act 1. 35 ~" .. , . 11.. TheDeciineojBritishFascism 263 •• (1' 13, A CiviiSociety 300 ••• Bibliograpf?y 307 Index 330 support from possible sources ofdiscontent. The most impor­ 7. British Fascist Ideology tant were its appeals to youth, nationalism, anti-Communism, anti-Semitism and its attacks on the political liites. Policy was often manipulated with a callous disregard for principles so that at least one of the themes, anti-Semitism, gained ascendancy over the B.O.F.'s proposals for reform. Policy was hinged to the likelihood ofan impending economic crisis and attempts were made to locate the causes and to pre­ scribe its resolution. As the probability ofan economic crisis _ and hence political power - grew remote, the possibility of an international crisis was stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appeal of Fascism to the British Aristocracy During the Inter-War Years, 1919-1939
    THE APPEAL OF FASCISM TO THE BRITISH ARISTOCRACY DURING THE INTER-WAR YEARS, 1919-1939 THESIS PRESENTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OFARTS. By Kenna Toombs NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY MARYVILLE, MISSOURI AUGUST 2013 The Appeal of Fascism 2 Running Head: THE APPEAL OF FASCISM TO THE BRITISH ARISTOCRACY DURING THE INTER-WAR YEARS, 1919-1939 The Appeal of Fascism to the British Aristocracy During the Inter-War Years, 1919-1939 Kenna Toombs Northwest Missouri State University THESIS APPROVED Date Dean of Graduate School Date The Appeal of Fascism 3 Abstract This thesis examines the reasons the British aristocracy became interested in fascism during the years between the First and Second World Wars. As a group the aristocracy faced a set of circumstances unique to their class. These circumstances created the fear of another devastating war, loss of Empire, and the spread of Bolshevism. The conclusion was determined by researching numerous books and articles. When events required sacrifice to save king and country, the aristocracy forfeited privilege and wealth to save England. The Appeal of Fascism 4 Contents Chapter One Background for Inter-War Years 5 Chapter Two The Lost Generation 1919-1932 25 Chapter Three The Promise of Fascism 1932-1936 44 Chapter Four The Decline of Fascism in Great Britain 71 Conclusion Fascism After 1940 83 The Appeal of Fascism 5 Chapter One: Background for Inter-War Years Most discussions of fascism include Italy, which gave rise to the movement; Spain, which adopted its principles; and Germany, which forever condemned it in the eyes of the world; but few include Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Fascism in Britain Steven Woodbridge
    Racial Fascism in Britain Steven Woodbridge In June,1945, within just a few months of the discovery of the scale and horrors of the German Nazi extermination camps, and shortly after the conclusion of military hostilities in Europe, the British fascist ideologue and racist activist Arnold Spencer Leese (1878-1956) announced to readers of his new monthly news-sheet Gothic Ripples that he had written a book entitled The Jewish War of Survival.1 A month later, Leese revealed to his supporters that he believed that ‘the finest civilisation that Europe ever had has been wiped out of existence by the Allies in a Jewish war’.2 During the course of the rest of the year, as Britain and other countries across Europe tried to recover from all the destruction and chaos caused by five long years of conflict against Nazi Germany, Leese went on to further develop his highly inflammatory views by criticising the war as the product of the ‘Revenge Instinct’ of the Jews.3 He also labelled the evidence presented at the Nuremberg War Crimes trial as ‘Belsen Bunkum’, and dismissed the Nuremberg hearings generally as ‘purely a Jewish and Masonic’ affair, ‘only explicable by the Jewish control of “Democracy” and Bolshevism’.4 It was very clear to veteran anti-fascists and to Jewish groups in Britain, and also to officials in both the British Government’s Home Office and the domestic Security Service (MI5), that Leese, despite being interned in prison under the 18B Defence Regulations during the war as a possible security risk, had not lost his extreme enthusiasm for fascism and, above all, for the anti-Semitic and racial ideas that had 1 characterised the Nazi version of the doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER and STUDIES Vol
    EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol. 36, No. 1 Spring 2005 “The Funniest Book in the World”: Waugh and The Diary of a Nobody by Peter Morton Flinders University Evelyn Waugh did not enjoy his Christmas of 1946. It was the second after the war and the national mood was somber. Troops were still being demobilized and the food rationing was worse than ever. As a Christmas “bonus” the government had allowed an extra eight pence worth of meat (half to be corned beef), but bread and potatoes were about to be rationed for the first time. To top it all, the weather was deteriorating and the winter 1946-7 would be the worst in living memory. Waugh, then in his early 40s, was en famille at Piers Court, and that was always a trial in itself. And he felt beleaguered. New houses were encroaching on his land, the socialist “grey lice” were in government, taxes were punitive and he was thinking of emigrating to Ireland. He tried to stay in fairly good humor on the day itself, for the sake of the children, but without much success. He was disgusted by his children’s shoddy presents and the general disorder. Their lunch was cold and ill-cooked. His wife had given him some caviar, but he had eaten that the week before. All in all, it was a “ghastly” day. He had already told his diary that he was looking forward to his forthcoming stay in hospital, for an operation on his hemorrhoids, to get away from them all.[1] The one bright spot of the day was his mother’s gift: a copy of George & Weedon Grossmith’s Diary of a Nobody, the seventh edition (J.
    [Show full text]