DOCSLIB.ORG

Elected Officials Who Support Marriage Equality ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO SUPPORT MARRIAGE EQUALITY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elected Officials Who Support Marriage Equality ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO SUPPORT MARRIAGE EQUALITY Elected Officials Who Support Marriage Equality ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO SUPPORT MARRIAGE EQUALITY Former President Bill Clinton This spring, same-sex marriage was legalized in Iowa, Vermont, Connecticut, Maine and New Hampshire. In his most recent remarks on the subject, Clinton said, ‚I think all these states that do it, should do it.‛ Asked if he personally supported same-sex marriage, Clinton replied, ‚Yeah. I personally support people doing what they want to do,‛ Clinton said. ‚I think it's wrong for someone to stop someone else from doing that [same-sex marriage].‛i Upon the introduction of the Respect for Marriage Act, former President Clinton released a statement praising its sponsors and stating, ‚Throughout my life I have opposed discrimination of any kind. When the Defense of Marriage Act was passed, gay couples could not marry anywhere in the United States or the world for that matter. Thirteen years later, the fabric of our country has changed, and so should this policy.‛ii Former Vice President Al Gore ‚Gay men and women ought to have the same rights as heterosexual men and women—to make contracts, to have hospital visiting rights, to join together in marriage, and I don’t understand why it is considered by some people to be a threat to heterosexual marriage,‛ he said on a video blog that appeared on his Current TV network. ‚Shouldn't we be promoting the kind of faithfulness and loyalty to ones partner regardless of sexual orientation?‛iii Former Vice President Dick Cheney ‚I think that freedom means freedom for everyone. As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish.‛iv U.S. SENATORS Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) Senator Boxer supports marriage equality and was an early opponent of Proposition 8. She was one of only 14 Senators to vote against the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. She has been vocal in her opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would enshrine discrimination against gays and lesbians into the federal Constitution.v Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) Senator Brown is a strong advocate of gay rights. He opposed an amendment to Ohio’s constitution that banned same sex marriage. Brown was also one of the few U.S. Representatives to vote against the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) This op-ed by Senator Chris Dodd ran in The Meriden Record-Journal and is posted on his website ‚Public officials aren’t supposed to change their minds. But I firmly believe that it’s important to keep learning. Last week, while I was in Connecticut meeting with members of the gay and lesbian community from across the state, I had the opportunity to tell them what I’ve learned about marriage, and about equality. While I’ve long been for extending every benefit of marriage to same-sex couples, I have in the past drawn a distinction between a marriage-like status (‚civil unions‛) and full marriage rights. The reason was simple: I was raised to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. And as many other Americans have realized as they’ve struggled to reconcile the principle of fairness with the lessons they learned early in life, that’s not an easy thing to overcome. But the fact that I was raised a certain way just isn’t a good enough reason to stand in the way of fairness anymore. The Connecticut Supreme Court, of course, has ruled that such a distinction holds no merit under the law. And the Court is right. I believe that effective leaders must be able and willing to grow and change over their service. I certainly have during mine – and so has the world. Thirty-five years ago, who could have imagined that we’d have an African-American President of the United States? My young daughters are growing up in a different reality than I did. Our family knows many same-sex couples – our neighbors in Connecticut, members of my staff, parents of their schoolmates. Some are now married because the Connecticut Supreme Court and our state legislature have made same-sex marriage legal in our state. But to my daughters, these couples are married simply because they love each other and want to build a life together. That’s what we’ve taught them. The things that make those families different from their own pale in comparison to the commitments that bind those couples together. And, really, that’s what marriage should be. It’s about rights and responsibilities and, most of all, love. I believe that, when my daughters grow up, barriers to marriage equality for same- sex couples will seem as archaic, and as unfair, as the laws we once had against inter- racial marriage. And I want them to know that, even if he was a little late, their dad came down on the right side of history. I have always been proud of my long record fighting for the civil rights of the LGBT community. I’ve co-sponsored legislation to strengthen hate crime laws and end discrimination in the workplace. I’ve spoken out against ‚don’t ask, don’t tell‛ and always supported equal rights for domestic partnerships. But I am also proud to now count myself among the many elected officials, advocates, and ordinary citizens who support full marriage equality for same-sex couples. I understand that even those who oppose discrimination might continue to find it hard to re-think the definition of marriage they grew up with. I know it was for me. But many of the things we must do to make our union more perfect – whether it’s fighting for decades to reform our health care system or struggling with a difficult moral question – are hard. They take time. And they require that, when you come to realize that something is right, you be unafraid to stand up and say it. That’s the only way our history will progress along that long arc towards justice.‛vi Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) ‚Gay and lesbian couples should be able to marry and have access to the same rights, privileges, and benefits that straight couples currently enjoy. Denying people this basic American right is the kind of discrimination that has no place in our laws, especially in a progressive state like Wisconsin. The time has come to end this discrimination and the politics of divisiveness that has become part of this issue.‛vii Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) ‚As a state, I believe we should uphold the ability of our friends, neighbors, and co- workers who are gay and lesbian to enter into the contract of marriage.‛ Senator Al Franken (D-MN) Senator Franken has been a longtime champion for gay rights and has stated that marriage is a basic issue of civil rights. ‚I’m pro-same-sex marriage,‛ he said. ‚I think DOMA will be history soon.‛viii Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) ‚I believe in marriage equality.‛ Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) Senator Harkin was asked about this year’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling in support of marriage equality. He responded on an Iowa television show, ‚Iowa Press,‛ that, ‚We all grow as we get older, and we learn things and we become more sensitive to people and people’s lives. And the more I’ve looked at that, I’ve grown to think differently about how people — how we should live. And I guess I’m at the point of live and let live.‛ ‚There’s always going to be some who feel that they have to push this issue, and for whatever reason, they’re going to try to push it and try to divide people up, but they’re on the losing end. They’re on the losing end of history.‛ Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) Senator Kennedy was one of the most visible champions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights in the history of the Senate. A vocal proponent of same-sex marriage, he received the Gerry Studds Visibility Award from the Fenway Community Health Center in Boston, the nation's largest LGBT-focused health facility. Senator John Kerry (D-MA) On October 22, 2008, Senator Kerry delivered a speech at Tufts University, after which he was asked if he supported marriage rights for same-sex couples. His answer: ‚Absolutely.‛ Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) ‚The government should get out of the business of telling same-sex couples in committed relationships that they can't marry. Anything else is not equality.‛ Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) Senator Leahy has long supported equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, and supports marriage equality. Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) Senator Merkley states that he ‚strongly supports marriage equality and will lead the way for equal rights in the U.S. Senate.‛ Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) Senator Reed supports gay rights, voting against the Federal Marriage Amendment, and voting in favor of measures that prevent job discrimination and hate crimes against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) Senator Sanders is a strong supporter of gay rights, including marriage equality. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) In a letter jointly signed with the NY's Junior U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Schumer said, ‚Equal protection under the law has always been a hallmark of the American political and legal system, and in this instance we believe this principle should be extended to all those in our state who seek the civil contract of marriage and the numerous legal rights and protections that come with it.‛ Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) After Governor John Lynch signed the marriage equality bill in New Hampshire, Senator Shaheen stated: ‚I congratulate Governor Lynch and the state legislature on advancing a marriage equality bill that also protects religious freedom.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Broken Bargain: Full Report
    A BROKEN BARGAIN Discrimination, Fewer Bene!ts and More Taxes for LGBT Workers Full Report June 2013 National Center for TRANSGENDER EQUALITY With a foreword by Authors Partners This report was authored by: This report was developed in partnership with: 2 Movement Advancement Project Freedom to Work The Movement Advancement Project (MAP) is an Freedom to Work is a national organization dedicated independent think tank that provides rigorous research, to the notion that all Americans deserve the freedom insight and analysis that help speed equality for LGBT to build a successful career without fear of harassment people. MAP works collaboratively with LGBT organizations, or discrimination because of their sexual orientation advocates and funders, providing information, analysis and or gender identity. For more information, visit resources that help coordinate and strengthen their e!orts www.freedomtowork.org. for maximum impact. MAP also conducts policy research to inform the public and policymakers about the legal and National Partnership for Women & Families policy needs of LGBT people and their families. For more The National Partnership for Women & Families works to information, visit www.lgbtmap.org. promote fairness in the workplace, reproductive health and rights, access to quality a!ordable health care, Center for American Progress and policies that help women and men meet the dual The Center for American Progress (CAP) is a think tank demands of work and family. For more information, visit dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through www.nationalpartnership.org. ideas and action. CAP combines bold policy ideas with a modern communications platform to help shape the National Center for Transgender Equality national debate.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred and Twenty- Second TOWN of HANOVER
    One Hundred and Twenty- Second ANNUAL REPORT of the Officers and Committees of the TOWN OF HANOVER FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 1974 One Hundred and Twent!J-Second ANNUAL REPORT of the Officers and Committees of the TOWN OF HANOVER FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 1974 BRAINTREE GRAPHICS CENTER FORMERLY MODERN BLUE PRINT CO. TOWN OF HANOVER PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS Twelfth Congressional District GERRY E. STUDDS, Cohasset COUNCILOR Fourth Councilor District PATRICK J. McDONOUGH, Boston STATE SENATOR Norfolk & Plymouth Senatorial District ALLAN R. McKINNON, Weymouth STATE REPRESENTATIVE Second Plymouth District WILLIAM J. FLYNN, JR., Hanover COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JOHN F. FRANEY North Abington EDWARD P. KIRBY Whitman GERARD F. BURKE Brockton Population - 10,499 ( 1971 State Census) -3- TOWN OFFICERS SELECTMEN Howard F. Levings, Chairman Term expires 197 5 Allan A. Carnes Term expires 1976 Francis J. Mitchell Term expires 1977 ASSESSORS *Byron H. Webber, Jr. Term expires 1975 R. Irving Lovell, Chairman Term expires 1976 Dr. Ralph C. Briggs Term expires 1977 **Frederick Bigler, Clerk *Resigned **To Fill Unexpired Term TOWN CLERK John W. Murphy Term expires 1977 TREASURER Dorothy E. Tripp Term expires 1977 TAX COLLECTOR Eleanor S. Blaisdell Term expires 1977 SCHOOL COMMITTEE William F. Chouinard, Chairman Term expires 1976 Earle H. Anderson Term expires 1977 Kenneth R. Lingley Term expires 1976 James M. Wheeler Term expires 1975 Marjorie H. Abbott Term expires 1975 BOARD OF HEALTH Frederick L. Briggs, Chairman Term expires 1975 Albert E. Sullivan, Jr. Term expires 1976 Edward R. Hammond, Jr. Term expires 1977 TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC LIBRARY Pearl A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 July 27, 2011 Dear Senator: RE: ACLU Urges Support and Co
    WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE July 27, 2011 Dear Senator: RE: ACLU Urges Support and Co-Sponsorship of the Respect for Marriage Act (S. 598) On behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a non-partisan organization with more than a half million members, countless additional AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION activists and supporters, and fifty-three affiliates nationwide, we are writing WASHINGTON to urge you to support and co-sponsor the Respect for Marriage Act (S. 598). LEGISLATIVE OFFICE TH 915 15th STREET, NW, 6 FL WASHINGTON, DC 20005 T/202.544.1681 The Respect for Marriage Act, which was introduced earlier this year by F/202.546.0738 WWW.ACLU.ORG Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), would repeal the discriminatory, so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in its entirety, as well as provide all LAURA W. MURPHY DIRECTOR married couples certainty that regardless of where they travel or move in the NATIONAL OFFICE country, they will not be treated as strangers under federal law. The Respect 125 BROAD STREET, 18TH FL. NEW YORK, NY 10004-2400 for Marriage Act would return the federal government to its historic role in T/212.549.2500 deferring to states in determining who is married. OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS SUSAN N. HERMAN PRESIDENT When DOMA (Public Law 104-199) was passed by Congress and signed ANTHONY D. ROMERO into law in 1996, gay and lesbian couples could not legally marry in any EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR state, and it was not until 2000 that Vermont made national headlines with ROBERT REMAR its civil unions law. Today, gay and lesbian couples can legally marry in six TREASURER states – Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Vermont – as well as in the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwell-1972.Pdf (9.896Mb)
    TOWN OF NOR ONE HUNDRED TWENTY THIRD Annual Report OF THE TOWN OF NORWELL Massachusetts For the Year Ending December 31, 1972 Norweil Public Library FAIRMOUNT PRESS, INC. Rockland, Massachusetts TOWN OF NORWELL PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS Twelfth Congressional District GERRY E. STUDDS, COHASSET (D) First Councillor District NICHOLAS W. MITCHELL, FALL RIVER (D) Norfolk and Plymouth Senatorial Districts ALLAN R. McKINNON, WEYMOUTH (D) Ninth Plymouth Representative District ROGER SUMNER BABB, NORWELL (R) County Commissioners GEORGE A. RIDDER, EAST BRIDGEWATER (R) JOHN J. FRANEY (D) EDWARD P. KIRBY (R) NORTH ABINGTON WHITMAN 1971 State Census - 8,249 TOWN DATA Norwell is situated in Southeastern Massachusetts, bordered by the Towns of Hanover and Rockland on the west, Pembroke on the south, Marshfield and Scituate on the east and northeast, and Hingham on the north. The town covers 20.98 square miles and is 22 miles south of Boston and 14 miles east of Brockton. In 1950 the population was 2,515 people, and in 1960 had increased to 5,207 people, an increase of 107%, one of the largest percentage increases in the State of Massachusetts. In 1965 the population was 6,387, which indicates that although slightly down on an annual average the population growth is substantial. Population in 1971 is 8,249. The town was settled in 1634 and in 1888 adopted its name from Henry Norwell, a prominent summer resident. It has a Town Meeting form of government with a Moderator, Board of Selectmen, Board of Assessors, Planning Board, Town Clerk, Treasurer and Highway Surveyor. Three main roads run through the town; Routes 53 (formerly Route 3), Route 123, and the newly-relocated Route 3 (known as the Southeast Expressway).
    [Show full text]
  • Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding, Democracy, and the Constitution
    Wardle 5.0 10/15/2010 10:14 AM SECTION THREE OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: DECIDING, DEMOCRACY, AND THE CONSTITUTION Lynn D. Wardle TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction: DOMA and Self-Government .................................... 952 II. Five Dimensions of the Controversy Over DOMA .......................... 954 III. The Politics of DOMA ......................................................................... 959 A. The Legislative and Popular Politics of DOMA .......................... 960 B. The Academic Politics of DOMA ................................................. 964 C. The Judicial Politics of DOMA Litigation ................................... 965 IV. The Constitutionality of DOMA Section Three Under Structural Federalism and Separation of Powers Principles .............................. 973 A. Section Three and Federalism Doctrine ....................................... 974 B. A Short Primer on the History of Federal Regulation of the Meaning and Incidents of Family Relations for Purposes of Federal Law ...................................................................................... 976 C. Federalism Self-Contradictions by Opponents of Section Three of DOMA .............................................................................. 982 V. Popular Sovereignty, Constitutional Consensus, and Same-Sex Marriage Recognition ........................................................................... 985 A. Popular Sovereignty and Institutional Re-Constitution ............. 986 B. Constitutional Consensus and Same-Sex Marriage
    [Show full text]
  • Defense of Marriage Act, Will You Please Go Now! Joanna L
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2012 Defense of Marriage Act, Will You Please Go Now! Joanna L. Grossman Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Joanna L. Grossman, Defense of Marriage Act, Will You Please Go Now! Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 155 (2012) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/334 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. C ARDOZO L AW R EVIEW de•novo DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, WILL YOU PLEASE GO NOW! JOANNA L. GROSSMAN* The time has come. The time has come. The time is now. Just go. Go. GO! I don’t care how. You can go by foot. You can go by cow. Marvin K. Mooney, will you please go now! INTRODUCTION These are the opening lines of Marvin K. Mooney Will You Please Go Now!, a Dr. Seuss book that my three sons and I have read literally hundreds of times. It has all the usual appeal of a Dr. Seuss book – euphonious rhymes, made-up words and objects, fantastical creatures. But it has something else, too. An air of mystery. The entire book revolves around trying to get rid of Marvin K.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKING the BALANCES: an Examination of Separation of Powers Issues Raised by the Windsor Case Derek Funk*
    CHECKING THE BALANCES: An Examination of Separation of Powers Issues Raised by the Windsor Case Derek Funk* INTRODUCTION The legal definition of marriage is currently a prominent issue in political debates and courtrooms across the nation. Up until the late 1990s, state and federal law universally defined marriage as between a man and a woman.1 The push for recognition of same-sex marriages began to gain momentum in 2000, when Vermont became the first state in the U.S. to legalize same-sex civil unions and registered partnerships.2 In the next few years, several other states across the nation changed their definitions of marriage to include same- sex couples.3 Nevertheless, the federal definition of marriage under the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), enacted in 1996, continued to define marriage as meaning only a legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife.4 As more and more states changed their definitions of marriage, same-sex marriage advocates criticized the federal definition of marriage, arguing it *. J.D. Candidate, 2015, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. 1. See Marriage, GALLUP.COM, http://www.gallup.com/poll/117328/marriage.aspx (last visited Dec. 20, 2014). 2. See Timeline: Milestones in the American Gay Rights Movement, PBS.ORG, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/timeline/stonewall/ (last visited Oct. 28, 2014); Gay Marriage Timeline: History of the Same-sex Marriage Debate, PROCON.ORG, http://gaymarriage.procon.org/view.timeline.php?timelineID=000030 (last visited Oct. 28, 2014); History and Timeline of the Freedom to Marry in the United States, FREEDOMTOMARRY.ORG, http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/history-and-timeline-of- marriage (last visited Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015
    Annual Report July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015 ANNUAL REPORT 2011–2012 1 Preserving America’s Past Since 1791 Board of Trustees 2015 Officers Trustees Life Trustees Charles C. Ames, Chair Benjamin C. Adams Bernard Bailyn A Message from the Chair of the Board & the President Nancy S. Anthony, Oliver Ames Leo Leroy Beranek Vice Chair Frederick D. Ballou Levin H. Campbell, Sr. In FY2015 the Society’s quest to promote the value and importance of our country’s Frederick G. Pfannenstiehl, Levin H. Campbell, Jr. Henry Lee past reached new heights. Vice Chair Joyce E. Chaplin Trustees Emeriti Programming was at the forefront as we sought a larger, more diverse following. Judith Bryant Wittenberg, William C. Clendaniel Nancy R. Coolidge Our conference, “So Sudden an Alteration”: The Causes, Course, and Consequences of Secretary Herbert P. Dane Arthur C. Hodges the American Revolution, was a centerpiece. The largest scholarly conference we have William R. Cotter, Amalie M. Kass James M. Storey ever presented, it stimulated passionate, meaningful discussion and received wide praise. Accompanying this gathering was the exhibition God Save the People! From the Treasurer Anthony H. Leness John L. Thorndike Stamp Act to Bunker Hill, which focused on the prelude to the American Revolution. G. Marshall Moriarty Hiller B. Zobel Lisa B. Nurme This was just one of the highlights of a year during which the MHS offered over 110 Lia G. Poorvu public programs on topics as diverse as the Confederate raid of St. Albans, Vermont, Byron Rushing the first flight to the North Pole, and colonial New England’s potent potables.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense of Marriage Act: Dedicated to Articulating and Advancing a Family- Centered Philosophy of Public Life
    Founded in 1983, Family Research Council is a nonprofit research and educational organization The Defense of Marriage Act: dedicated to articulating and advancing a family- centered philosophy of public life. In addition to What It Does and Why It Is Vital providing policy research and analysis for the for Traditional Marriage in America legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the federal government, FRC seeks to inform the news media, the academic community, business leaders, and the general public about family issues that affect the nation. Family Research Council relies solely on the generosity of individuals, families, foundations, and businesses for financial support. The Internal Revenue Service recognizes FRC as a tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) charitable organization. Donations to FRC are therefore tax-deductible in accordance with Section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code. To see other FRC publications and to find out more about FRC’s work, visit www.frc.org. , BC10D01 family research council , order line -- Washington, DC .. frc The Defense of Marriage Act: What It Does and Why It Is Vital Thank you for choosing this for Traditional Marriage in America resource. Our pamphlets are designed for grassroots activ- by christopher m. gacek, j.d., ph.d. ists and concerned citizens—in other words, people who want to make a difference in their families, in their com- Introduction munities, and in their culture. The federal Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law in September 1996, is a vital element in History has clearly shown the influence that the preserving traditional marriage in America for “Values Voter” can have in the political process.
    [Show full text]
  • Studds, Gerry (1937-2006) by Linda Rapp
    Studds, Gerry (1937-2006) by Linda Rapp Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Gerry Studds. Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com Representative Gerry Eastman Studds was the first member of the United States Congress to acknowledge that he was gay. During his twelve terms in the House of Representatives he was known for his accessibility to his constituents and his effective advocacy of their concerns, notably in matters of the environment, health care, and fishing and maritime issues. Gerry Studds was the namesake of his ancestor Elbridge Gerry, vice-president under James Madison and a signer of the Declaration of Independence from Massachusetts. Studds was born in Mineola, New York, on May 12, 1937, but grew up in Cohasset, Massachusetts, a part of the district that he would later represent. Studds attended Yale University, from which he received a bachelor's degree in history in 1959 and a master's degree in 1961. In the 1960s Studds was a foreign service officer in the State Department in Washington, D. C., and was also an assistant at the White House, working on a Kennedy administration initiative to establish a domestic Peace Corps. Later he became a teacher of history and government at a private school in New Hampshire. Studds made his first run for public office in 1970, but lost to the incumbent Republican representative in a close election. In preparation for the next campaign, Studds learned to speak Portuguese, the language of a sizable community in the district, and also studied issues related to fishing, an important industry in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • US Immigration
    BUSHELL (DO NOT DELETE) 5/29/2013 2:45 PM “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Masses”—Just as Long as They Fit the Heteronormative Ideal: U.S. Immigration Law’s Exclusionary & Inequitable Treatment of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Queer Migrants Logan Bushell* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 674 II. IMMIGRATION & SEXUALITY: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF REGULATING SEXUALITY AT THE BORDER .......................................... 677 A. 1875-1917: Establishing a Foundational Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants .................................................... 678 B. 1917-1990: Adherence to the Blueprint for Exclusion of LGBTQ Migrants ......................................................................... 680 III. REFUGE IN THE COURTHOUSE? THE JUDICIARY’S APPROACH TO EXCLUSIONARY IMMIGRATION LAWS & POLICIES .............................. 683 A. Boutilier v. INS: Not Welcome—The Judiciary’s Sanctioning of Exclusionary Immigration Laws & Policies ............................ 683 B. Hill v. INS: An Inclusionary Olive Branch from the Judiciary ... 685 IV. TWO STEPS FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK: PROGRESSIVE MEASURES PROVE MERELY PRETEXTUAL ........................................... 687 A. No Longer Categorically Excluded, but Certainly Not Included: Dismissing LGBTQ Persons from Family Unification ................................................................................... 687 B. Defense of Marriage Act: Deciding Exactly Who
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    January 5, 2011 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E7 by the Washington, DC based Leapfrog file, because of the need to secure Milliken’s demands by repeatedly passing legislation lib- Group. The Leapfrog Survey, which launched support. eralizing the rules governing the importation of in 2001, focuses on four critical areas of pa- He invested in the educational life of this pharmaceuticals. However, implementation of community. Wofford and Converse colleges this provision has been blocked by the federal tient safety: the use of computer physician would not be the institutions they are today order entry to prevent medication errors, without his generous support. He helped bureaucracy. It is time Congress stood up for standards for doing high-risk procedures, pro- found Spartanburg Day School. the American consumer and removed all un- tocols and policies to reduce medical errors Milliken recognized that this region would necessary regulations on importing pharma- and other safe practices recommended by the need first-class air transportation to com- ceuticals. National Quality Forum and adequate nurse pete with other areas and attract industry. The Prescription Drug Affordability Act also and physician staffing. In addition, hospitals He helped establish Greenville-Spartanburg protects consumers’ access to affordable med- are measured on their progress in preventing International Airport, and the airport com- icine by forbidding the federal government mission, for the first time in its more than infections and other hospital-acquired condi- from regulating any Internet sales of FDA-ap- 50-year history, now has to look for a new proved pharmaceuticals by State-licensed tions and adopting policies on the handling of chairman.
    [Show full text]