DOCSLIB.ORG

Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education (3–8 Years) Definitions, Theories, Development and Progression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Research Report No. 17 Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education (3–8 years) Definitions, Theories, Development and Progression Elizabeth Dunphy, Thérèse Dooley and Gerry Shiel With Deirdre Butler, Dolores Corcoran, Miriam Ryan and Joe Travers International Advisor: Professor Bob Perry © NCCA 2014 ISSN 1649-3362 National Council for Curriculum and Assessment 35 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2. T: +353 1 661 7177 F: +353 1 661 7180 E: [email protected] www.ncca.ie Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education (3–8 years) Definitions, Theories, Development and Progression Elizabeth Dunphy, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin Thérèse Dooley, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin Gerry Shiel, Educational Research Centre, Dublin Deirdre Butler, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin Dolores Corcoran, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin Miriam Ryan, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin Joe Travers, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin Professor Bob Perry, Charles Sturt University, Australia Educational Research Centre Foras Taighde Ar Oideachas Research conducted on behalf of the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment 2014 2 Research Report No. 17 Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education (3–8 years) Acronyms AAMT Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Aistear The Early Childhood Curriculum Framework (2009) CCSSM Common Core States Standards for Mathematics (United States) CHAT Cultural historical activity theory DEIS Delivering Equality of Opportunities in Schools DES Department of Education and Skills (formerly Department of Education and Science ) DfEE Department for Education and Employment (United Kingdom) EAL English as an Additional Language ECA Early Childhood Australia ENRP Early Numeracy Research Project (Victoria, Australia) ERC Educational Research Centre HLT Hypothetical Learning Trajectory ICT Information and Communication Technology KDU Key Developmental Understanding LFIN Learning Framework in Number (Wright, Martland & Stafford, 2006) LT Learning Trajectory NAEYC National Association for the Education of Young Children (United States) NCCA National Council for Curriculum and Assessment NCTM National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (United States) NGA National Governors Association (United States) NRC National Research Council (United States) OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PISA Programme for International Student Assessment PM Project Maths PSC Primary School Curriculum (1999) PSMC Primary School Mathematics Curriculum (1999) RME Realistic Mathematics Education RTI Response to Intervention (United States Initiative) STEM Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics TAL Tussendoelen Annex Leerlijinen (in Dutch); Intermediate Attainment Targets (in English) TIMSS Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................... 7 A View of Mathematics ..................................................... 8 Context ................................................................. 8 Definitions of Mathematics Education .......................................... 9 Theoretical Perspectives ..................................................... 9 Language and Communication ............................................... 10 Defining Goals ........................................................... 10 The Development of Children’s Mathematical Thinking . 11 Assessing and Planning for Progression......................................... 11 Addressing Diversity ....................................................... 12 Key Implications . 13 A View of Mathematics ................................................ 15 Introduction ......................................................... 19 Context ................................................................ 20 Developing Mathematics Education in Ireland for Children Aged 3–8 Years ............... 20 Curriculum Context ....................................................... 22 Performance Context ...................................................... 23 Policy Context ........................................................... 24 Linguistic and Social Contexts................................................ 27 Overview of Chapters ..................................................... 28 Chapter 1: Defining Mathematics Education .............................. 31 The Foundations of Mathematics . 32 A Definition of Mathematics Education ......................................... 33 Numeracy . 34 Defining Mathematics Education for Children Aged 3–8 Years ......................... 36 A Key Aim of Mathematics Education: Mathematical Proficiency ...................... 37 Mathematization........................................................... 38 Conclusion . 40 4 Research Report No. 17 Mathematics in Early Childhood and Primary Education (3–8 years) Chapter 2: Theoretical Perspectives ...................................... 41 Sociocultural Perspectives................................................... 43 A Cultural-Historical Activity Theory Perspective ................................... 45 A Situative Perspective ...................................................... 46 Cognitive Perspectives ..................................................... 47 Constructivist Perspectives ................................................... 47 Constructionism .......................................................... 48 A Redeveloped Primary School Mathematics Curriculum ............................ 51 Implications for Practice .................................................... 52 Conclusion . 56 Chapter 3: Language, Communication and Mathematics .................... 57 The Role of Language in Developing Mathematical Knowledge ....................... 59 Adult Support . 60 The Nature and Scope of Mathematical Discourse ................................. 61 Establishing a Math-Talk Culture ............................................. 63 Learning Mathematical Vocabulary ............................................ 64 Variation in Language Skills and Impact on Mathematics ........................... 65 Conclusion .............................................................. 66 Chapter 4: Defining Goals ............................................. 69 A Coherent Curriculum ..................................................... 70 Specifying Goals ......................................................... 71 Overarching Goals for Mathematics Education ..................................... 71 Higher-Order Thinking .................................................... 71 Engaging with Powerful Mathematical Ideas.................................... 72 Exploring the Big Ideas in Mathematics Learning................................. 72 The Structure of Curriculum Materials .......................................... 74 Breaking Down the Goals: Critical Transitions within Mathematical Domains ............. 75 Conclusion . 78 Chapter 5: The Development of Children’s Mathematical Thinking ............. 79 A Historical Perspective..................................................... 80 From Stages of Development to Levels of Sophistication in Thinking ................... 81 5 Table of Contents Developing Children’s Mathematical Thinking: Three Approaches ..................... 81 The First Approach: Working with Children’s Thinking and Understanding (RME) ........... 82 Key Features............................................................ 82 The Teacher’s Task ....................................................... 83 The Second Approach: Teacher-Generated Hypothetical Learning Trajectories (Simon) ....... 85 The Third Approach: Pre-Specified Developmental Progressions as a Basis for Learning Trajectories (Sarama and Clements) ................................... 87 Comparing the Three Approaches ............................................ 90 Definitions and Characteristics................................................. 90 Recognising Diverse Routes in Learning .......................................... 92 Recognising Developmental Variation . 93 Curriculum Development and the Role of Learning Trajectories ....................... 94 Supporting Teachers in Planning ............................................... 94 Supporting Learning for Pre-Service Teachers...................................... 95 Conclusion . 96 Chapter 6: Assessing and Planning for Progression ......................... 97 Assessing Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood . 98 Formative Assessment ..................................................... 99 Conceptual Frameworks ..................................................... 99 Methods ............................................................... 100 Observations .......................................................... 100 Tasks . 101 Interviews ............................................................ 102 Conversations.......................................................... 103 Pedagogical Documentation .............................................. 104 Supporting Children’s Progression with Formative Assessment ....................... 104 Diagnostic and Summative Assessment........................................ 106 Screening/Diagnostic Tools .................................................. 108 Standardised Norm-Referenced Tests .......................................... 109 Planning for Progression Using Assessment Outcomes............................. 110 Immersion Settings . 111 Children with Special Needs ................................................
Recommended publications
  • Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024

    Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024

    Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024 Prepared under the National Adaptation Framework Prepared by the Department of Health www.gov.ie/health Health Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan 2019-2024 1 Contents Foreword 5 Executive Summary 7 Development of a Plan for Ireland’s Health Sector, 2019 – 2024 7 Six climate scenarios with profound health implications 8 Predicted climate risks and health impacts for Ireland include: 10 1. Introduction 11 Mandate and vision 12 Health context and the case for adaptation 13 Mainstreaming climate change adaptation 14 Limitations – more research, better data 15 Development of this Plan 16 2. Scene-setting: climate change, health, and Ireland 21 2.1. Health in Ireland, climate in Ireland 22 2.1.1 Health of the population 22 2.1.2 Climate in Ireland 23 2.1.3 Climate change projections for Ireland 23 2.2. Effect of climate change on human health 24 2.3. Health implications of climate change in Ireland 24 2.3.1 Health impacts of temperature changes 24 2.3.2 Health impacts of drought and flooding 29 2.3.3 Health impacts of storms 32 2.3.4 Mental health impacts 32 2.3.5 Risks to health services 32 3. Prioritisation 35 3.1. Climate Impact Screening 36 3.2. Developing Priorities 38 3.3. Climate scenarios – Priority Impacts 41 3.3.1 UV / Sun exposure 41 3.3.2 Air pollution 41 3.3.3 Windstorms 41 3.3.4 Heat / Heatwaves 42 3.3.5 High precipitation / Flooding 43 3.3.6 Extreme cold snaps 43 2 Contents 4.
  • A Comparison of TIMSS 2011 and PISA 2012 Mathematics Frameworks and Performance for Ireland and Selected Countries

    A Comparison of TIMSS 2011 and PISA 2012 Mathematics Frameworks and Performance for Ireland and Selected Countries

    A Comparison of TIMSS 2011 and PISA 2012 mathematics frameworks and performance for Ireland and Selected countries Seán Close and Gerry Shiel Educational Research Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin 9 Irish schools recently participated in two major international surveys of mathematics achievement – TIMSS 2011 and PISA 2012. These two surveys originate from different philosophies of mathematics education as reflected in their assessment frameworks and tests. This paper compares the two mathematics frameworks in terms of mathematical content and cognitive processes and in terms of the test results, particularly at the level of performance subscales, in the context of Irish mathematics curricula and results for selected countries including UK and Northern Ireland. Some concerns arising from this analysis are discussed along with recommendations which could inform curriculum review. INTRODUCTION In 2011, Ireland participated in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science (TIMSS) Study, which is organised every four years by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Whereas TIMSS is offered at both Fourth and Eighth grades (equivalent to Fourth class at primary level in Ireland, and Second year at post-primary level), Ireland participated at Grade 4 only. However, students in Grades 4 and 8 in Ireland will take part in the next TIMSS study in 2015. In 2012, Ireland participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which is organised by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Unlike TIMSS, PISA uses an age-based sample (students aged 15-years), which cuts across grade levels (Second to Fifth year in Ireland, with a majority of students in Third year).
  • A Case Study Exploring the Nature of How Prekindergarten Teachers’ Mathematics Instruction Decisions Relate to Their Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge

    A Case Study Exploring the Nature of How Prekindergarten Teachers’ Mathematics Instruction Decisions Relate to Their Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge

    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Teaching & Learning Theses & Dissertations Teaching & Learning Spring 2020 A Case Study Exploring the Nature of How Prekindergarten Teachers’ Mathematics Instruction Decisions Relate to Their Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge Raleta Summers Dawkins Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_etds Part of the Early Childhood Education Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Dawkins, Raleta S.. "A Case Study Exploring the Nature of How Prekindergarten Teachers’ Mathematics Instruction Decisions Relate to Their Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge" (2020). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Teaching & Learning, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/63kg-gz86 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_etds/61 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Teaching & Learning at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Teaching & Learning Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CASE STUDY EXPLORING THE NATURE OF HOW PREKINDERGARTEN TEACHERS’ MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION DECISIONS RELATE TO THEIR MATHEMATICS PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE by Raleta Summers Dawkins B.S. December 2004, North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State University M.A. Ed. December 2008,
  • Chapter 13 National Science Foundation Systemic Initiatives

    Chapter 13 National Science Foundation Systemic Initiatives

    Chapter 13 National Science Foundation Systemic Initiatives: How a small amount of federal money promotes ill-designed mathematics and science programs in K-12 and undermines local control of education Michael McKeown Mathematically Correct David Klein California State University, Los Angeles Chris Patterson Education Connection of Texas Since its inception in 1950, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has played a strong, positive role in making American scientific research and technological application the best in the world. Through its funding of peer-reviewed, investigator-initiated research proposals, it has supported basic research in a wide variety of scientific disciplines, such as mathematics, biology, physics, chemistry, geology, astronomy, and psychology. American science owes much to the support it has received, and continues to receive, from NSF. This chapter deals with a program in the Education and Human Resources Division called the NSF Systemic Initiatives Program, not with NSF programs related directly to the support of basic research. We are highly critical of this particular NSF program. Not only do the Systemic Initiatives undermine local control of education, but, as our analysis in this chapter suggests, they also seem to lower academic standards for mathematics education and weaken the educational base for American science. This chapter is composed of three sections. The first section, an overview of NSF Systemic Initiatives, was written by Michael McKeown. The second section, an analysis of the development and 288 Standards Wars features of the Los Angeles Systemic Initiative, was written by David Klein. The third section, an analysis of the development and features of the Texas Statewide Systemic Initiative, was written by Chris Patterson.
  • Report, While the Results for Problem Solving Will Be Published by the OECD in Spring 2014

    Report, While the Results for Problem Solving Will Be Published by the OECD in Spring 2014

    on Mathematics, Reading Literacy and Science in PISA 2012 on Mathematics, Reading Literacy in Ireland of 15-year-olds Achievements The Education for Life: Learning for Life: The Achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland on Mathematics, Reading Literacy and Science in PISA 2012 Perkins Shiel Merriman Educational Research Centre, St Patrick’s College, Dublin 9 Cosgrove http://www.erc.ie Rachel Perkins, Gerry Shiel, Brían Merriman, ISBN:ISBN 978 0-900440-42-2 0 900440 42 7 Moran Jude Cosgrove and Gráinne Moran 9 780900 440427 ERC Educational Research Centre Learning for Life: The Achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland on Mathematics, Reading Literacy and Science in PISA 2012 Learning for Life The Achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland on Mathematics, Reading Literacy and Science in PISA 2012 Rachel Perkins Gerry Shiel Brían Merriman Jude Cosgrove Gráinne Moran Educational Research Centre Copyright © 2013, Educational Research Centre, St Patrick’s College, Dublin 9 http://www.erc.ie Cataloguing-in-publication data: Perkins, Rachel. Learning for Life: The Achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland on Mathematics, Reading Literacy and Science in PISA 2012 / Rachel Perkins, Gerry Shiel, Brían Merriman, Jude Cosgrove, Gráinne Moran. Dublin: Educational Research Centre xx, 224p., 30cm ISBN: 978 0 900440 42 7 1. Programme for International Student Assessment (Project) 2. Mathematics (Secondary) – Ireland 3. Reading (Secondary) – Ireland 4. Science (Secondary) – Ireland 5. Academic achievement 6. Educational surveys – Ireland 2013 I Title. II Shiel, Gerry. III Merriman, Brían. IV Cosgrove, Jude. V Moran, Gráinne. 371.262 Printed in the Republic of Ireland by eprint Limited, Dublin.
  • Mathematics in African History and Cultures

    Mathematics in African History and Cultures

    Paulus Gerdes & Ahmed Djebbar MATHEMATICS IN AFRICAN HISTORY AND CULTURES: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY African Mathematical Union Commission on the History of Mathematics in Africa (AMUCHMA) Mathematics in African History and Cultures Second edition, 2007 First edition: African Mathematical Union, Cape Town, South Africa, 2004 ISBN: 978-1-4303-1537-7 Published by Lulu. Copyright © 2007 by Paulus Gerdes & Ahmed Djebbar Authors Paulus Gerdes Research Centre for Mathematics, Culture and Education, C.P. 915, Maputo, Mozambique E-mail: [email protected] Ahmed Djebbar Département de mathématiques, Bt. M 2, Université de Lille 1, 59655 Villeneuve D’Asq Cedex, France E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Cover design inspired by a pattern on a mat woven in the 19th century by a Yombe woman from the Lower Congo area (Cf. GER-04b, p. 96). 2 Table of contents page Preface by the President of the African 7 Mathematical Union (Prof. Jan Persens) Introduction 9 Introduction to the new edition 14 Bibliography A 15 B 43 C 65 D 77 E 105 F 115 G 121 H 162 I 173 J 179 K 182 L 194 M 207 N 223 O 228 P 234 R 241 S 252 T 274 U 281 V 283 3 Mathematics in African History and Cultures page W 290 Y 296 Z 298 Appendices 1 On mathematicians of African descent / 307 Diaspora 2 Publications by Africans on the History of 313 Mathematics outside Africa (including reviews of these publications) 3 On Time-reckoning and Astronomy in 317 African History and Cultures 4 String figures in Africa 338 5 Examples of other Mathematical Books and 343
  • Extended Instruction in Business Courses to Enhance Student Achievement in Math Lessie Mcnabb Houseworth Walden University

    Extended Instruction in Business Courses to Enhance Student Achievement in Math Lessie Mcnabb Houseworth Walden University

    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2015 Extended Instruction in Business Courses to Enhance Student Achievement in Math Lessie McNabb Houseworth Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Other Education Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University COLLEGE OF EDUCATION This is to certify that the doctoral study by Lessie Houseworth has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Calvin Lathan, Committee Chairperson, Education Faculty Dr. Jennifer Brown, Committee Member, Education Faculty Dr. Amy Hanson, University Reviewer, Education Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2015 Abstract Extended Instruction in Business Courses to Enhance Student Achievement in Math by Lessie M. Houseworth EdS, Walden University, 2010 MS, Indiana University, 1989 BS, Indiana University, 1976 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Walden University March 2015 Abstract Poor achievement on standardized math tests negatively impacts high school graduation rates. The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate if math instruction in business classes could improve student achievement in math. As supported by constructivist theory, the students in this study were encouraged to use prior knowledge and experiences to make new connections between math concepts and business applications.
  • Mathematics Education

    Mathematics Education

    MTHE—Mathematics Education 899 Master's Thesis Research MATHEMATICS MTHE Fall, Spring, Summer. 1 to 8 credits. A stu- EDUCATION dent may earn a maximum of 36 credits in all enrollments for this course. R: Open to masters students in the Mathematics Edu- Program in Mathematics Education cation Major. Approval of department. College of Natural Science Master's thesis research. 430 History of Mathematics 926 Proseminar in Mathematics Education I Spring. 3(3-0) P: MTH 133 and MTH 301 Fall of odd years. 3(3-0) Interdepartmental SA: SME 430 with Counseling, Educational Psychology Development of mathematical thought from ancient and Special Education and Mathematics times to the present, selected from Egyptian, Baby- and Teacher Education. Administered by lonian, Mayan, Greek, Indian, and Arab contribu- Mathematics Education. SA: SME 926 tions to mathematics and to the context of today's Research on the learning and teaching of mathe- school mathematics curriculum. matics. Focus on curriculum, discourse, equity and teacher education. 800 Problems in Mathematics for Teachers Fall, Spring, Summer. 1 to 5 credits. A stu- 927 Proseminar in Mathematics Education II dent may earn a maximum of 15 credits in Fall of even years. 3(3-0) Interdepartmental all enrollments for this course. RB: Elemen- with Counseling, Educational Psychology tary Certification or Secondary Certification and Special Education and Mathematics in Mathematics Education R: Open to grad- and Teacher Education. Administered by uate students in the Mathematics Education Mathematics Education. SA: SME 927 Major. Approval of department. Research on the learning and teaching of mathe- Supervised study of problems or issues in mathe- matics.
  • An Alternative Route to Teaching Fraction Division: Abstraction of Common Denominator Algorithm

    An Alternative Route to Teaching Fraction Division: Abstraction of Common Denominator Algorithm

    International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2015, 7(3), 399-422. An Alternative Route to Teaching Fraction Division: Abstraction of Common Denominator Algorithm İsmail Özgür ZEMBAT Mevlana (Rumi) University, Turkey Received: February 2015 / Revised: May 2015 / Accepted: May 2015 Abstract From a curricular stand point, the traditional invert and multiply algorithm for division of fractions provides few affordances for linking to a rich understanding of fractions. On the other hand, an alternative algorithm, called common denominator algorithm, has many such affordances. The current study serves as an argument for shifting curriculum for fraction division from use of invert and multiply algorithm as a basis to the use of common denominator algorithm as a basis. This was accomplished with the analysis of learning of two prospective elementary teachers being an illustration of how to realize those conceptual affordances. In doing so, the article proposes an instructional sequence and details it by referring to both the (mathematical and pedagogical) advantages and the disadvantages. As a result, this algorithm has a conceptual basis depending on basic operations of partitioning, unitizing, and counting, which make it accessible to learners. Also, when participants are encouraged to construct this algorithm based on their work with diagrams, common denominator algorithm formalizes the work that they do with diagrams. Keywords: Teaching fraction division, abstracting common denominator algorithm, curriculum development Introduction Arithmetic operations, and teaching and learning of them have always been an interest for mathematics education community. In his historical analysis, Usiskin (2007) pointed out that operations (especially on fractions) still preserve its importance in school mathematics and they should be given enough emphasis.
  • AVAILABLE from ABSTRACT DOCUMENT RESUME Exemplary

    AVAILABLE from ABSTRACT DOCUMENT RESUME Exemplary

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 434 033 SE 062 877 TITLE Exemplary and Promising Mathematics Programs. INSTITUTION Department of Education, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 71p.; Prepared by the "Math and Science Education Expert Panel." AVAILABLE FROM ED Pubs, P.O. Box 1389, Jessup, MD. Tel: 877-433-7827 (Toll Free); Web site: <http://www.enc.org>. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Academic Standards; Demonstration Programs; Elementary Secondary Education; Mathematics Curriculum; *Mathematics Education; *Program Descriptions; *Program Evaluation ABSTRACT Selecting programs, textbooks, and curriculum materials is one of the most important decisions educators make. An Expert Panel on Mathematics and Science was established by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a high-quality, research-based process for selecting programs and to use that selecting process to identify exemplary and promising programs. This booklet describes eight mathematics programs designated as exemplary or promising. A detailed explanation of the submission and selection process and an explanation of how the programs were separated into exemplary and promising categories is included. The four characteristics used for the selection criteria include quality of program, usefulness to others, educational significance, and evidence of effectiveness and success. Each characteristic has multiple criteria with specific indicators of achievement. Each program is described in terms of the four selection characteristics and professional
  • History and Pedagogy of Mathematics in Mathematics Education: History of the Field, the Potential of Current Examples, and Directions for the Future Kathleen Clark

    History and Pedagogy of Mathematics in Mathematics Education: History of the Field, the Potential of Current Examples, and Directions for the Future Kathleen Clark

    History and pedagogy of mathematics in mathematics education: History of the field, the potential of current examples, and directions for the future Kathleen Clark To cite this version: Kathleen Clark. History and pedagogy of mathematics in mathematics education: History of the field, the potential of current examples, and directions for the future. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Feb 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands. hal-02436281 HAL Id: hal-02436281 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02436281 Submitted on 12 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. History and pedagogy of mathematics in mathematics education: History of the field, the potential of current examples, and directions for the future Kathleen M. Clark Florida State University, School of Teacher Education, Tallahassee, Florida USA; [email protected] The field of history of mathematics in mathematics education—often referred to as the history and pedagogy of mathematics domain (or, HPM domain)—can be characterized by an interesting and rich past and a vibrant and promising future. In this plenary, I describe highlights from the development of the field, and in doing so, I focus on several ways in which research in the field of history of mathematics in mathematics education offers important connections to frameworks and areas of long-standing interest within mathematics education research, with a particular emphasis on student learning.
  • Problematizing the Philosophy of Mathematics in a Time of Curriculum Reform Kimberly White-Fredette

    Problematizing the Philosophy of Mathematics in a Time of Curriculum Reform Kimberly White-Fredette

    The Mathematics Educator 2009/2010, Vol. 19, No. 2, 21–31 Why Not Philosophy? Problematizing the Philosophy of Mathematics in a Time of Curriculum Reform Kimberly White-Fredette This article argues that, as teachers struggle to implement curriculum reform in mathematics, an explicit discussion of philosophy of mathematics is missing from the conversation. Building on the work of Ernest (1988, 1991, 1994, 1998, 1999, 2004), Lerman (1990, 1998, 1999), the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989, 1991, 2000), Davis and Hersh (1981), Hersh (1997), Lakatos (1945/1976), Kitcher (1984), and others, the author draws parallels between social constructivism and a humanism philosophy of mathematics. While practicing mathematicians may be entrenched in a traditional, Platonic philosophy of mathematics, and mathematics education researchers have embraced the fallibilist, humanist philosophy of mathematics (Sfard, 1998), the teachers of school mathematics are caught somewhere in the middle. Mathematics teachers too often hold true to the traditional view of mathematics as an absolute truth independent of human subjectivity. At the same time, they are pushed to teach mathematics as a social construction, an activity that makes sense only through its usefulness. Given these dichotomous views of mathematics, without an explicit conversation about and exploration of the philosophy of mathematics, reform in the teaching and learning of mathematics may be certain to fail. The teaching and learning of mathematics is without a radical change in instructional practices going through tremendous changes. The National and an equally radical change in teachers’ views of Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ (NCTM, 2000) mathematics teaching and learning, as well as the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics discipline of mathematics itself.