List of For-Profit Universities and Colleges
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FY 2014 Management Challenges
U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General FY 2014 Management Challenges November 2013 Office of Inspector General Kathleen S. Tighe Inspector General November 2013 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Inspector General, FY 2014 Management Challenges. Please Note: The Inspector General’s FY 2014 Management Challenges is available on the ED OIG Web site at http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oig/reports.html. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The Inspector General November 12, 2013 MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Arne Duncan Secretary of Education FROM: Kathleen S. Tighe Inspector General SUBJECT: Management Challenges for Fiscal Year 2014 The Reports Consolidation Act of 2000 requires the U.S. Department of Education (Department), Office of Inspector General to identify and report annually on the most serious management challenges the Department faces. The Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010 requires the Department to include in its agency performance plan information on its planned actions, including performance goals, indicators, and milestones, to address these challenges. To identify management challenges, we routinely examine past audit, inspection, and investigative work, as well as issued reports where corrective actions have yet to be taken; assess ongoing audit, inspection, and investigative work to identify significant vulnerabilities; and analyze new programs and activities that could post significant challenges because of their breadth and complexity. Last year, we presented four management challenges: improper payments, information technology security, oversight and monitoring, and data quality and reporting. -
Comments from the Legal Aid Community to the Department of Education Re
Comments from the Legal Aid Community to the Department of Education re: Proposed Regulations on Program Integrity and Improvement: State Authorization of Distance Education Programs Docket ID ED-2016-OPE-0050 August 24, 2016 Comments submitted on behalf of: East Bay Community Law Center Empire Justice Center Housing and Economic Rights Advocates National Consumer Law Center (on behalf of its low-income clients) LAF (formerly Legal Assistance Foundation of Metropolitan Chicago) Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles Legal Aid Society of San Diego, Inc. Legal Services NYC New York Legal Assistance Group Project on Predatory Student Lending of the Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School Public Law Center Margaret Reiter in her individual capacity Introduction These comments, submitted on behalf of organizations across the country that provide free legal assistance to low-income student loan borrowers, address the Department’s proposed regulations regarding the state authorization of distance education programs.1 Our comments are informed by our work as legal aid practitioners. We strive to meet the legal needs of individuals 1 81 Fed. Reg. 48598 (proposed July 25, 2016). 1 and families with limited economic means, who otherwise would be without professional legal assistance. Margaret Reiter also joins in these comments in her individual capacity, not as a representative of any organization or agency. She was a consumer investigator with the Los Angeles County Consumer Affairs Department for four years and worked for 20 years as a consumer prosecutor with the California Attorney General’s Consumer Law Section. She investigated or prosecuted businesses engaged in many types of misrepresentations and unlawful business practices, including postsecondary for-profit schools. -
Career Education Corporation to Stop Collecting on Loans, Change
Career Education Corporation to Stop Collecting on Loans, Change Practices in Agreement with Maryland, 48 Other Attorneys General Settlement Will Bring $493.7 Million in Nationwide Debt Relief for CEC Students BALTIMORE, MD (January 3, 2019) – Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh today announced a settlement with for-profit education company Career Education Corporation (CEC) in which CEC will forgo collecting more than $8.5 million in debts owed by 2,784 Maryland students. The settlement also mandates that CEC significantly reform its recruiting and enrollment practices and make a $5 million payment to the settling states. Maryland will receive $264,285.71 of this payment, with the rest distributed to the other settling states, the National Association of Attorneys General Financial Services and Consumer Protection Fund, and the State Center. Illinois-based CEC currently operates online courses through American InterContinental University (AIU) and Colorado Technical University (CTU), and has closed or phased out many of its other schools over the past 10 years. Its brands have included Briarcliffe College, Brooks Institute, Brown College, Harrington College of Design, International Academy of Design & Technology, Le Cordon Bleu, Missouri College, and Sanford-Brown. There are no physical CEC-operated campuses currently in Maryland. The Assurance of Discontinuance (Assurance) with attorneys general in 48 states and the District of Columbia, requires CEC to forgo any and all efforts to collect amounts owed by former students who either attended a CEC institution that closed before January 1, 2019, or whose final day of attendance at AIU or CTU occurred on or before December 31, 2013. -
Nulldfr 2016 Report
Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,500 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on student enrollment, graduation rates, student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel, the figures in this report provide selected indicators for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2015-16 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. This report provides a list of pre-selected comparison group institutions and the criteria used for their selection. Additional information about these indicators and the pre- selected comparison group are provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. -
Student Handbook 2021 the MISSION of the TOOELE TECHNICAL COLLEGE
Student Handbook 2021 THE MISSION OF THE TOOELE TECHNICAL COLLEGE The Tooele Technical College provides rewarding, competency-based, affordable, and accessible career preparation for youth and adults to meet the needs of Utah employers. Tooele Technical College 88 South Tooele Blvd. Tooele, UT 84074 435-248-1800 phone 435-248-1900 fax WWW.TOOELETECH.EDU Table of Contents: President’s Message .............................................................................................. 1 Three Steps to Success at the TATC ..................................................................... 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................... 3 Certificates .................................................................................................. 3 Enrollment Objectives ................................................................................. 3 Curriculum ................................................................................................... 3 Open Entry / Open Exit .............................................................................. 4 Satisfactory Progress .................................................................................. 4 Student Services .................................................................................................... 4 Advising Services ........................................................................................ 4 Admissions and Registration ...................................................................... -
State Inaction: Gaps in State Oversight of For-Profit Higher
STATE INACTION GAPS IN STATE OVERSIGHT OF FOR-PROFIT HIGHER EDUCATION NCLC® NATIONAL CONSUMER December 2011 LAW CENTER® © Copyright 2011, National Consumer Law Center, Inc. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Deanne Loonin is a staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) and the Director of NCLC’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project. She was formerly a legal services attorney in Los Angeles. She is the author of numerous publications and reports, including NCLC publications Student Loan Law and Surviving Debt. Jillian McLaughlin is a research assistant at NCLC. She graduated from Kalamazoo College with a degree in political science. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is a release of the National Consumer Law Center’s Student Loan Borrower Assis- tance Project [www.studentloanborrowerassistance.org]. The authors thank NCLC colleagues Carolyn Carter, Jan Kruse, and Persis Yu for valuable comments and assistance. We also thank Allen Agnitti, Laura Kirshner, and Kurt Terwilliger for research assistance. The findings and conclusions presented in this report are those of the authors alone. NCLC® ABOUT THE NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER The National Consumer Law Center®, a nonprofit corporation founded in 1969, assists NATIONAL consumers, advocates, and public policy makers nationwide on consumer law issues. CONSUMER NCLC works toward the goal of consumer justice and fair treatment, particularly for those whose poverty renders them powerless to demand accountability from the economic LAW marketplace. NCLC has provided model language and testimony on numerous consumer CENTER law issues before federal and state policy makers. NCLC publishes an 18-volume series ® of treatises on consumer law, and a number of publications for consumers. -
Eagle Gate College Group
2019 SCHOOL CATALOG This catalog applies to the following Main & Branch locations: Eagle Gate College – Main Campus Provo College – Main Campus 5588 South Green Street 1450 West 820 North Murray, UT 84123 Provo, UT 84601 801-333-8100 801-818-8901 Eagle Gate College – Branch Campus Administrative Office 915 North 400 West 1401 Dove Street, #340 Layton, UT 84041 Newport Beach, CA 92660 801-546-7500 888-382-8183 EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2019 to DECEMBER 31, 2019. The Colleges reserve the right to change the content and terms and conditions in this catalog at any time without prior notice. Information in this catalog is current at the time of publishing. Contents ABOUT EAGLE GATE COLLEGE AND PROVO COLLEGE ........................................................... 3 FACILITIES AND INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 5 ADMISSIONS REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 5 FINANCIAL AID................................................................................................................................ 10 Career Loan Programs .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Scholarship Programs .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Grant Programs .................................................................................................................................................. -
Transfers to In-State-Private and Out-Of-State Institutions by Institution
Transfers to In-State Private and Out-of-State Institutions 2012-13 through 2016-17 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- 2016- 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Marin CCD Total 119 120 124 118 107 In-State-Private (ISP) Total 53 56 50 50 44 Out-of-State (OOS) Total 66 64 74 68 63 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- 2016- In-State-Private (ISP) Institutions 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Academy Of Art University 4 7 4 3 4 Academy Of Chinese Culture And Health Sc 1 Alliant International University-San Die 1 1 American College Of Traditional Chinese Med 1 Argosy University-The Art Institute Of C 3 Ashford University 1 2 1 2 Azusa Pacific University 1 Brandman University 1 Brooks Institute 1 California Baptist University 1 California College Of The Arts 3 1 1 California College San Diego 1 California Institute Of Integral Studies 1 1 2 1 California Lutheran University 1 Chapman University 2 2 1 Cogswell College 1 Concordia University-Irvine 1 Devry University-California 2 2 Dominican University Of California 17 15 12 9 10 Golden Gate University-San Francisco 3 4 2 1 ITT Technical Institute-Rancho Cordova 1 1 1 John F. Kennedy University 2 1 2 Loyola Marymount University 2 Marymount California University 1 1 Mills College 5 3 1 National University 1 1 Notre Dame De Namur University 2 2 Occidental College 1 Pacific Oaks College 1 1 Pacific Union College 1 1 Pepperdine University 1 Pitzer College 1 Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness Updated February 2019 1 2012- 2013- 2014- 2015- 2016- In-State-Private (ISP) Institutions 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Saint Marys College -
Teaching and Learning Conference 2021: Teaching in the Spotlight: What Is the Future for HE Curricula? On-Demand Session Abstracts 6-8 July 2021
Teaching and Learning Conference 2021: Teaching in the spotlight: What is the future for HE curricula? On-demand session abstracts 6-8 July 2021 5Ps: An incremental innovation Dericka Frost and Janet Turley, University of the Sunshine Coast Whilst the move to technology-enabled learning and teaching [TELT] during 2020 transformed higher education course delivery, it exacerbated the digital divide. Students with low confidence, limited internet access, bandwidth and inadequate hardware became even less visible. 5Ps is an innovative student-focused study strategy developed in response to this transition in one pathways program course at an Australian regional university. 5Ps provides inexperienced students with a formula and an explicit step-by-step guide, potentially strengthening their academic self-efficacy and independence regardless of technological inequities. A 40,000 strong force for sustainable development: Affecting change whilst enhancing employability through applied research and the Sustainable Development Goals Dr Jennifer O'Brien, University of Manchester Students at the University of Manchester represent a 40,000-strong force for potential change who want to make a difference. This presentation will critically discuss how we are harnessing the power of our students to affect change through their assessment to the benefit of sustainable development and their employability. We are deploying Education for Sustainable Development in a Living Lab approach framed around the Sustainable Development Goals. The University Living Lab equips and empowers our students with the skills and confidence to affect real change for sustainable development through interdisciplinary applied research projects required by external partners. A brave new world: Has the global pandemic broken the boundaries of tradition and reformed assessment in STEM? Dr Laura Roberts and Dr Joanne Berry, Swansea University For centuries STEM disciplines have relied on traditional, on-site exams to drive learning and knowledge. -
Career Education Corp
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND John Marshall Courts Building COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, EXREL. MARK R. HERRING, ) ATTORNEY GENERAL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) y# ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION, ) a Delaware eorporation. ) ) AMERICAN INTERCONTINENTAL UNIVERSITY, INC., ) a Georgia corporation ) ) and ) ) COLORADO TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, INC., ) a Colorado corporation. ) ) 3 20 ig ) %>, Defendants. ) £-c. COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Commonwealth of Virginia, by, through, and at the relation of the Attorney General of Virginia, Mark R. Herring (the "Plaintiff or the "Commonwealth"), petitions this Court to declare that the activities in which the Defendants, Career Education Corporation ("CEC"), American Intercontinental University, Inc. ("AIU"), and Colorado Technical University, Inc. ("CTU") (collectively, the "Defendants"), have engaged constitute violations of the Virginia Consumer Protection Act ("VCPA"), Virginia Code §§ 59.1-196 to 59.1-207. The Plaintiff prays that this Court grant the relief requested in this Complaint and states the following in support thereof: 1 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. The Commonwealth brings this action pursuant to its authority in Virginia Code § 59.1-203, which provides, inter alia, that the Attorney General may bring an action to enjoin any violation of the VCPA. The Circuit Court for the City of Richmond has authority to entertain this action and to grant the relief requested pursuant to Virginia Code §§ 8.01-620, 17.1-513, 59.1-203, 59.1-205 and 59.1-206. Venue in this Court -
FOI 158-19 Data-Infographic-V2.Indd
Domicile: Population: Approved, England, means-tested Wales & students, under 25, estranged [1] Northern from their Ireland parents Total: Academic Year: Count of students by provider 2017/18 8080 Manchester Metropolitan University 220 Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) 170 De Montfort University (DMU) 150 Leeds Beckett University 150 University Of Wolverhampton 140 Nottingham Trent University 140 University Of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) 140 Sheeld Hallam University 140 University Of Salford 140 Coventry University 130 Northumbria University Newcastle 130 Teesside University 130 Middlesex University 120 Birmingham City University (BCU) 120 University Of East London (UEL) 120 Kingston University 110 University Of Derby 110 University Of Portsmouth 100 University Of Hertfordshire 100 Anglia Ruskin University 100 University Of Kent 100 University Of West Of England (UWE) 100 University Of Westminster 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 1. “Estranged” means the customer has ticked the “You are irreconcilably estranged (have no contact with) from your parents and this will not change” box on their application. 2. Results rounded to nearest 10 customers 3. Where number of customers is less than 20 at any provider this has been shown as * 1 FOI | Estranged students data by HEP, academic year 201718 [158-19] Plymouth University 90 Bangor University 40 University Of Huddersfield 90 Aberystwyth University 40 University Of Hull 90 Aston University 40 University Of Brighton 90 University Of York 40 Staordshire University 80 Bath Spa University 40 Edge Hill -
Manchester Floor Plan Manchester Exhibitors 2020
MANCHESTER EXHIBITORS 2020 MANCHESTER University of Aberdeen 1 Cardiff Metropolitan University 33 University of Leicester 82 University of Southampton 135 University of Wolverhampton 148 HIGHER EDUCATION Abertay University 2 University of Central Lancashire 34 University of Lincoln 80 Solent University (Southampton) 136 University of Winchester 160 EXHIBITION Aberystwyth University 5 Royal Central School of Speech and Drama 95 University of Liverpool 88 University of St Andrews 137 University of Worcester 161 The Academy of Contemporary Music 3 University of Chester 35 Liverpool Hope University 79 SGS College 139 University of York 162 3 – 4 MARCH 2020 Anglia Ruskin University 4 City, University of London 121 Staffordshire University 138 83 163 Arden University 6 Coventry University 36 University of Stirling 140 Aston University 7 University for the Creative Arts 40 LMA 91 University of Strathclyde 142 Bangor University 9 University of Cumbria 39 London Metropolitan University 81 University of Suffolk 141 Supported by Barnsley College 8 De MontFort University 38 London School of Economics University of Sunderland 143 CAREER AND APPRENTICESHIP 97 and Political Science University of Bath 10 University of Surrey 144 British Army H 89 Loughborough University 84 Bath Spa University 11 University of Sussex 146 Microsoft C UCEN Manchester 92 University of Bedfordshire 12 Swansea University 149 National Apprenticeship Service A University of Derby 41 The University of Manchester 85 In association with Birmingham City University 14 Teesside University