DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDEX a Detailed Regional Correlation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDEX a Detailed Regional Correlation APPENDEX A Detailed Regional Correlation South North Section 06-08 Section 07-40 Section 07-11 Section 06-01 Section 07-06 Section 07-07 Section 07-08 Section 07-34 Section 07-32 Section 06-02 Section 07-10 Section 07-09 Section 07-05 Section 06-03 Section 07-36_pre Section 07-36 Section 07-04 Section 06-04 Section 07-38 Section 07-02 Section 07-37-pre Section 07-36-pro Section 07-03 Section 06-05 Section 07-39 Section 07-12 Section 06-06 Section 07-39-pro Section 07-13 Section 07-14 Section 06-07 Section 07-15 Section 06-10 Section 07-16 Section 07-01 Section 06-09 200 150 90 40 31 200 80 180 190 140 45 36 20 80 140 78 105 30 140 100 60 356 190 29 190 70 170 190 25 105 58 47 180 130 0 100 130 50 40 70 130 120 130 49 47 70 130 40 37 95 90 50 27 180 45 M 49 180 340 M 60 M 140 160 39 59 180 320 40 16 180 68 359 170 110 65 120 50 170 120 170 60 120 120 20 120 120 120 120 100 60 120 80 30 M 80 91 40 85 170 170 123 150 180 50 150 130 170 40 35 105 170 225 30 95 110 5 80 90 160 100 110 40 160 110 352 355 160 50 39 110 42 110 123 110 110 150 110 94 10 38 110 130 50 110 10 90 95 Ti 126 70 340 30 324 11 160 160 53 140 80 0 336 40 140 120 160 71 80 25 123 As, Th 160 18 30 160 205 30 210 92 20 2 100 150 58 110 1 90 20 30 120 100 150 90 100 80 150 40 100 100 100 80 100 0 140 100 66 74 75 130 120 4 100 80 18 55 40 72 100 100 60 20 40 132 341 95 150 Th, As 215 3 95 150 172 16 130 30 175 66 130 110 20 150 132 16 105 145 68 66 150 96 C,P,Op,Th 75 10 110 90 39 120 Th, Op 140 M O, Ar 150 20 20 80 90 140 M 80 90 41 35 41 140 30 90 Th, O, As, P 110 90 90 2 90 10 90 130 3 135 45 90 60 90 C 90 70 25 30 M 18 89 40 21 Ch 100 50 68 80 10 120 321 30 310 300 140 140 70 20 98 As, O, R 120 45 70 Ter 30 110 120 100 48 71 3 M 140 115 46 O, Th, P Op, Th 190 66 140 M M 40 70 50 0 64 75 80 5a Ro, As 235 M 235 51 130 110 70 79 61 140 M 80 10 130 35 80 M 72 70 4 220 130 20 80 31 80 10 80 156 M 0 80 4 120 86 80 80 245 30 50 85 5a 80 20 80 205 As, C, O, Ar 60 8b M Th 110 15 8a 15 O, Th 29 28 185 40 5b S, Th 12a 0 Th 12c 130 130 OP, Are, As O As, S 110 10 50 110 90 130 Sk, As, P Ch 75 130 6 60 8b 70 20 309 340 12b M 35 5 120 0 60 70 120 M 60 130 140 70 345 120 10 As, P 60 70 30 70 70 0 110 C, P 70 310 12d 70 320 334 10 92 70 5 70 M As,Th 50 51 O 24 20 30 M As, O 90 108 320 354 120 12c 120 100 150 100 6 0 8a 7 100 Op, Th 80 Th, As 120 155 328 330 Ch, Th, O, Ro, P 120 M Ch, O, Sk 60 Ar, As, P 15a 110 M 50 O, Th O, Ch, As 125 130 6 M 60 110 9a M M 60 110 50 Op, As, T 0 60 Sk, As, O, Ch 60 60 315 13a 11d M 60 100 60 As, P silt Th, Ch 60 clay 0 60 40 f sst. O,Rh c sst. m sst. vf sst. pebble cobble vc sst. silt 20 granule boulder 15b clay As, Are, Pa, Th f sst. O Ar, As 110 c sst. 110 m sst. vf sst. 90 pebble cobble vc sst. 7 granule boulder 90 70 110 110 As, P As, Ch As, Th, P 50 15c 15a 100 12c M 12b 11d 40 50 13b 100 40 50 Th, Sk 100 50 Op, Th, S, R 50 50 M Ch, P 50 Th, As, O 90 50 M 15b M M 50 30 14a 50 7 O, Th Th, Sk 15c 10 As, O, S 51 17a 100 100 9b 80 Th, Pa 80 60 100 M 16a M 100 Ar, Th M M 40 O, S, P, Ar M 90 As, O, Ch 30 M 9b 40 90 O, Ch Op, Zo Ch,As 30 S, O 40 90 40 40 40 As, P 11c M 16b 14b 40 C, Th M 80 40 14c Th, Ch, P M 40 20 40 D, Op C, O 0 17b Ch 11d M M 10a 138 90 90 11b 70 silt 17a 14a clay 129 50 f sst. 70 O c sst. M Sk, As 11a Ch, P m sst. vf sst. pebble cobble vc sst. 90 granule 14d boulder M 90 30 10b M 80 20 30 80 20 30 80 30 30 30 70 30 30 Ch, Lo 14b 30 30 M 10 17c 17b M 14e M 80 80 132 123 60 60 40 80 M 130 Ch 80 Th, Ch 20 10c 70 10 20 70 20 70 10 17c 14f 20 20 20 20 60 20 Th, O 20 0 17d 20 silt M clay f sst. 70 c sst. 70 50 m sst. Ph vf sst. pebble cobble vc sst. 50 30 granule P, Ch boulder 70 14g 70 M O, Ch 10 60 0 10 Th, Ch 60 10 P, Te 18 60 0 silt 10 10 10 50 As, Ch, P clay 10 f sst. 10 c sst. C, Th silt m sst. vf sst. clay pebble cobble vc sst. 10 granule f sst. 10 boulder c sst. m sst. Ar, P vf sst. pebble cobble vc sst. granule Ar boulder Pa, P 60 60 P, Sch, Th P, Lo 40 Ch P, Lo 40 20 60 P, Ch P, Te Ch, H 60 Ar, P,Sch 0 50 P, H Ch, Phy silt 0 50 clay 0 f sst. 50 c sst. m sst. 0 vf sst. 0 pebble cobble vc sst. silt 0 40 P silt 0 0 granule boulder clay H Zo, P, Ch clay silt f sst. silt 0 silt f sst. c sst. c sst. 0 silt clay silt m sst. clay vf sst. clay m sst. pebble cobble vf sst. vc sst. pebble cobble vc sst. clay f sst. clay Ch, P f sst. c sst. granule f sst. silt c sst. boulder granule c sst. boulder f sst. f sst. m sst. c sst. vf sst. silt m sst. c sst. pebble cobble m sst. vf sst. vc sst. clay vf sst. pebble cobble vc sst. pebble cobble vc sst. m sst. vf sst. m sst. granule pebble cobble clay vf sst. vc sst. boulder granule pebble cobble f sst. vc sst. granule boulder c sst. boulder granule granule f sst. boulder boulder c sst. m sst. vf sst. 50 vc sst. m sst. vf sst. pebble cobble 50 vc sst. 30 Pebbles Cobbles granule granules boulder 30 10 Boulders 50 50 40 40 40 30 H, Ch 40 40 20 20 0 40 silt 40 clay f sst. c sst. m sst. vf sst. vc sst. Pebbles 30 Cobbles granules P, Te 30 Boulders 20m 30 Fluvial sandstones Foreshore sandstones Flooding surfaces Dune-scale cross stratification Genetic lamination Ammonite Roots 20 Floodplain mudstones Upper shoreface sandstones Major flooding surface Current ripple cross lamination M 30 30 Massive sandstone Inoceramus Plant materials 10 10 30 Terminal distributary channels Lower shoreface sandstones 30 Sequence boundary Wave ripple cross lamination Herringbone structure Fish scale Bioturbation P 1km 20 Incised valley fills 20 20 Barriers facies Top of Ferron Sandstone Hummocky cross stratification Normal grading Fish vertibrate 225 Paleocurrents 10 P Delta front sandstones Lagoonal/Bay fill 20 20 Climing ripples 0 P, Ch Bayhead delta facies Coal seams Soft sediment deformation Wood chunk Calcareous nodules 0 Prodelta facies silt 20 clay silt f sst. c sst. 20 clay m sst. vf sst. f sst. vc sst. c sst. Pebbles m sst. vf sst. Cobbles vc sst. granules Boulders 10 Mud chips Pebbles Bentonites Planar stratification Coal Cobbles Shelf mudstones granules 10 Boulders 10 0 M As, P silt clay f sst. P, O c sst. m sst. vf sst. vc sst. Pebbles Cobbles Ichnological abbreviations: granules 10 10 Boulders 10 Ar, Arenicolites; As, Asterosoma; Ch, Chondrites; D, Diplocraterion; H, Helminthopsis; 10 0 Lo, Lockeia; O, Ophiomorpha; P, Planolites; Pa, Palaeophycus; Phy, Phycosiphon; Sch 0 silt 0 clay (m) silt f sst. c sst. Ro, Rosselia; Rh, Rhizocorallium; Sch, Schaubcylindrichnus; Sc, Scolicia; Sk, Skolithos; clay m sst. (m) silt vf sst. pebble cobble vc sst. f sst. c sst. granule clay boulder m sst. vf sst. vc sst. f sst.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microplastics in Beaches of the Baja California Peninsula
    UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE BAJA CALIFORNIA Chemical Sciences and Engineering Department MICROPLASTICS IN BEACHES OF THE BAJA CALIFORNIA PENINSULA TERESITA DE JESUS PIÑON COLIN FERNANDO WAKIDA KUSUNOKI Sixth International Marine Debris Conference SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES 7 DE MARZO DEL 2018 OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY RESULTS CONCLUSIONS OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence and distribution of microplastics in sandy beaches located in the Baja California peninsula. STUDY AREA 1200 km long and around 3000 km of seashore METHODOLOGY SAMPLED BEACHES IN THE BAJA CALIFORNIA PENINSULA • . • 21 sampling sites. • 12 sites located in the Pacific ocean coast. • 9 sites located the Gulf of California coast. • 9 sites classified as urban beaches (U). • 12 sites classified as rural beaches (R). SAMPLING EXTRACTION METHOD BY DENSITY. RESULTS Bahía de los Angeles. MICROPLASTICS ABUNDANCE (R) rural. (U) urban. COMPARISON WITH OTHER PUBLISHED STUDIES Area CONCENTRATIÓN UNIT REFERENCE West coast USA 39-140 (85) Partícles kg-1 Whitmire et al. (2017) (National Parks) United Kigdom 86 Partícles kg-1 Thompson et al. (2004) Mediterranean Sea 76 – 1512 (291) Partícles kg-1 Lots et al. (2017) North Sea 88-164 (190) Particles Kg-1 Lots et al. (2017) Baja California Ocean Pacific 37-312 (179) Particles kg-1 This study Gulf of 16-230 (76) Particles kg-1 This study California MORPHOLOGY OF MICROPLASTICS FOUND 2% 3% 4% 91% Fibres Granules spheres films Fiber color percentages blue Purple black Red green 7% 2% 25% 7% 59% Examples of shapes and colors of the microplastics found PINK FILM CABO SAN LUCAS BEACH POSIBLE POLYAMIDE NYLON TYPE Polyamide nylon type reference (Browne et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Rate of Granule Ripple Movement on Earth and Mars
    Icarus 203 (2009) 71–76 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The rate of granule ripple movement on Earth and Mars James R. Zimbelman a,*, Rossman P. Irwin III a, Steven H. Williams b, Fred Bunch c, Andrew Valdez c, Scott Stevens d a Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum MRC 315, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA b Education Division, National Air and Space Museum MRC 305, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA c Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve, 11500 Highway 150, Mosca, CO 81146-9798, USA d National Climatic Data Center, Federal Building, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville, NC 28801-5001, USA article info abstract Article history: The rate of movement for 3- and 10-cm-high granule ripples was documented in September of 2006 at Received 25 July 2008 Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve during a particularly strong wind event. Impact creep Revised 13 March 2009 induced by saltating sand caused 24 granules minÀ1 to cross each cm of crest length during wind that Accepted 13 March 2009 averaged 9msÀ1 (at a height well above 1 m), which is substantially larger than the threshold for sal- Available online 17 April 2009 tation of sand. Extension of this documented granule movement rate to Mars suggests that a 25-cm-high granule ripple should require from hundreds to thousands of Earth-years to move 1 cm under present Keywords: atmospheric conditions. Earth Published by Elsevier Inc. Geological processes Mars surface 1. Introduction ples.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Plankton Diatoms of the West Coast of North America
    MARINE PLANKTON DIATOMS OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA BY EASTER E. CUPP UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1943 BULLETIN OF THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA EDITORS: H. U. SVERDRUP, R. H. FLEMING, L. H. MILLER, C. E. ZoBELL Volume 5, No.1, pp. 1-238, plates 1-5, 168 text figures Submitted by editors December 26,1940 Issued March 13, 1943 Price, $2.50 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA _____________ CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND [CONTRIBUTION FROM THE SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY, NEW SERIES, No. 190] PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Taxonomy and taxonomic names change over time. The names and taxonomic scheme used in this work have not been updated from the original date of publication. The published literature on marine diatoms should be consulted to ensure the use of current and correct taxonomic names of diatoms. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 1 General Discussion 2 Characteristics of Diatoms and Their Relationship to Other Classes of Algae 2 Structure of Diatoms 3 Frustule 3 Protoplast 13 Biology of Diatoms 16 Reproduction 16 Colony Formation and the Secretion of Mucus 20 Movement of Diatoms 20 Adaptations for Flotation 22 Occurrence and Distribution of Diatoms in the Ocean 22 Associations of Diatoms with Other Organisms 24 Physiology of Diatoms 26 Nutrition 26 Environmental Factors Limiting Phytoplankton Production and Populations 27 Importance of Diatoms as a Source of food in the Sea 29 Collection and Preparation of Diatoms for Examination 29 Preparation for Examination 30 Methods of Illustration 33 Classification 33 Key 34 Centricae 39 Pennatae 172 Literature Cited 209 Plates 223 Index to Genera and Species 235 MARINE PLANKTON DIATOMS OF THE WEST COAST OF NORTH AMERICA BY EASTER E.
    [Show full text]
  • Method for Coating Mineral Granules to Improve Bonding to Hydrocarbon-Based Substrate and Coloring of Same
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Michigan Tech Patents Vice President for Research Office 10-29-2013 Method for coating mineral granules to improve bonding to hydrocarbon-based substrate and coloring of same Bowen Li [email protected] Ralph Hodek [email protected] Domenic Popko Jiann-Yang Hwang [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/patents Part of the Mining Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Li, Bowen; Hodek, Ralph; Popko, Domenic; and Hwang, Jiann-Yang, "Method for coating mineral granules to improve bonding to hydrocarbon-based substrate and coloring of same" (2013). Michigan Tech Patents. 125. https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/patents/125 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/patents Part of the Mining Engineering Commons US008568524B2 (12) United States Patent (io) Patent No.: US 8,568,524 B2 Li et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 29,2013 (54) METHOD FOR COATING MINERAL 106/472, 474, 475, 481, 482, 483, 486, 490, GRANULES TO IMPROVE BONDING TO 106/502, 284.04; 427/186; 588/256 HYDROCARBON-BASED SUBSTRATE AND See application file for complete search history. COLORING OF SAME (56) References Cited (75) Inventors: Bowen Li, Chassell, MI (US); Ralph Hodek, Chassell, MI (US); Domenic U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Popko, Lake Linden, MI (US); 2,118,898 A * 5/1938 Price ............. 428/145 Jiann-Yang Hwang, Chassell, MI (US) 3,397,073 A * 8/1968 Fehner .......... 428/405 4,378,403 A 3/1983 Kotcharian (73) Assignee: Michigan Technology University, 5,240,760 A 8/1993 George et al. Houghton, MI (US) 5,380,552 A 1/1995 George et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat (Efh) Amendment 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    New England Fishery Management Council 50 WATER STREET | NEWBURYPORT, MASSACHUSETTS 01950 | PHONE 978 465 0492 | FAX 978 465 3116 E.F. “Terry” Stockwell III, Chairman | Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director OMNIBUS ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH) AMENDMENT 2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact (SASI) approach: a tool for analyzing the effects of fishing on Essential Fish Habitat Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact Approach This document was prepared by the following members of the NEFMC Habitat Plan Development team, with feedback from the NEFMC Habitat Oversight Committee, NEFMC Habitat Advisory Panel, and interested members of the public. Michelle Bachman, NEFMC staff Peter Auster, University of Connecticut Chad Demarest, NOAA/Northeast Fisheries Science Center Steve Eayrs, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Kathyrn Ford, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jon Grabowski, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Brad Harris, University of Massachusetts School of Marine Science and Technology Tom Hoff, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council Mark Lazzari, Maine Department of Marine Resources Vincent Malkoski, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Dave Packer, NOAA/ Northeast Fisheries Science Center David Stevenson, NOAA/Northeast Regional Office Page Valentine, U.S. Geological Survey January 2011 Page 2 of 257 Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact Approach Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE SWEPT AREA SEABED IMPACT MODEL ........... 13 2.0 DEFINING HABITAT ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Upper Miocene
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas ISSN: 1026-8774 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Ochoa Landín, Lucas; Ruiz, Joaquín; Calmus, Thierry; Pérez Segura, Efrén; Escandón, Francisco Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Upper Miocene El Boleo Formation, Santa Rosalía, Baja California, Mexico Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 17, núm. 2, 2000, pp. 83-96 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Querétaro, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57217201 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, volumen 17, número 2, 83 2000, p. 83-96 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, México, D.F SEDIMENTOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE UPPER MIOCENE EL BOLEO FORMATION, SANTA ROSALÍA, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO Lucas Ochoa-Landín,1 Joaquín Ruiz,2 Thierry Calmus,3 Efrén Pérez-Segura1, and Francisco Escandón4 ABSTRACT The transtensional Upper Miocene Santa Rosalía basin, located in the east-central part of the Baja California Peninsula, consists of almost 500 m of non-marine to marine sedimentary deposits, and interbedded tuffaceous beds. The Santa Rosalía basin is a NW-SE elongated fault-bounded depocenter that records the sedimentation from Upper Miocene to Pleistocene time. The sequence is divided in El Boleo, La Gloria, Infierno and Santa Rosalía Formations. The lower most stratigraphic unit is the El Boleo Formation, a 200 to 300 m thick section composed in its lower part by a 1 to 5 m thick basal limestone and gypsum bodies followed by 170 to 300 m of clastic coarsening upward fan-delta, marine and nonmarine deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Species List
    FKNMS Species List A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1 Marine and Terrestrial Species of the Florida Keys 2 Phylum Subphylum Class Subclass Order Suborder Infraorder Superfamily Family Scientific Name Common Name Notes 3 1 Porifera (Sponges) Demospongia Dictyoceratida Spongiidae Euryspongia rosea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 4 2 Fasciospongia cerebriformis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 5 3 Hippospongia gossypina Velvet sponge 6 4 Hippospongia lachne Sheepswool sponge 7 5 Oligoceras violacea Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 8 6 Spongia barbara Yellow sponge 9 7 Spongia graminea Glove sponge 10 8 Spongia obscura Grass sponge 11 9 Spongia sterea Wire sponge 12 10 Irciniidae Ircinia campana Vase sponge 13 11 Ircinia felix Stinker sponge 14 12 Ircinia cf. Ramosa species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 15 13 Ircinia strobilina Black-ball sponge 16 14 Smenospongia aurea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey, Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 17 15 Thorecta horridus recorded from Keys by Wiedenmayer 18 16 Dendroceratida Dysideidae Dysidea etheria species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 19 17 Dysidea fragilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 20 18 Dysidea janiae species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 21 19 Dysidea variabilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 22 20 Verongida Druinellidae Pseudoceratina crassa Branching tube sponge 23 21 Aplysinidae Aplysina archeri species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 24 22 Aplysina cauliformis Row pore rope sponge 25 23 Aplysina fistularis Yellow tube sponge 26 24 Aplysina lacunosa 27 25 Verongula rigida Pitted sponge 28 26 Darwinellidae Aplysilla sulfurea species from G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle-Size Analysis
    Particle-Size Analysis Geologic Lab Methods – Dr. C.E. Heinzel University of Northern Iowa Dept. of Earth and Environmental Science Learning objectives 2 • Review sedimentary particle textures • Know Udden-Wentworth grain size scale and Phi (f) scale, and the relationships between the two • Know how to plot grain size data: histograms; frequency curves; cumulative frequency curves • Know how to obtain grain size data • Understand grain size descriptive statistics • Mode • Median • Graphic estimation of mean • Phi standard deviation (graphic estimation of sorting) • Graphic skewness Sedimentary textures 3 Textural properties of siliciclastic sediments and rocks include: 1. Grain size 2. Sorting 3. Grain shape 1. Rounding 2. Sphericity 4. Particle surface textures 5. Grain fabric Grain size scales 4 Udden-Wentworth scale • Geometric scale in which each step is twice as large as the previous one • Range is from 1/256 mm to >256 mm • Four major size classes are • Gravel (> 2.00 mm) • Sand (1/16 mm to 2.00 mm) • Silt (1/256 mm to 1/16 mm) • Clay (< 1/256 mm) } mud Grain size scales (continued) 5 • Phi scale (Krumbein) • Logarithmic scale useful for plotting and statistical calculations = -log2d (where d = grain diameter, in mm) Note that 1.00 mm = 0f increases with smaller grain size, decreases with larger grain size Handout Wentworth grain size chart from United States Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1195 Measuring grain size 7 • Technique for measuring grain size depends on: • Purpose of study • Size range of material being measured
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cretaceous and Paleocene Decapod Crustaceans from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula Author(S): Rodney M
    Paleontological Society Late Cretaceous and Paleocene Decapod Crustaceans from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula Author(s): Rodney M. Feldmann, Dale M. Tshudy, Michael R. A. Thomson Source: Memoir (The Paleontological Society), Vol. 28, Supplement to Vol. 67, no. 1 of the Journal of Paleontology (Jan., 1993), pp. 1-41 Published by: Paleontological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1315582 Accessed: 16/01/2009 20:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=paleo. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Paleontological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Memoir (The Paleontological Society).
    [Show full text]