DOCSLIB.ORG

Need to Know Be Familiar with Origins of World War II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Need to Know Be Familiar with Origins of World War II Origins of World War II (Total War Era, 1914‐1945) Be familiar with • Be able to recognize, define, describe, memorize, recall • Assessed through matching, ordering or placing events in sequence or on a timeline, fill‐in‐ the‐blank, multiple choice • Describe relevance of Anglo‐German Naval Agreement to German‐British and British‐French relations • Recall Joachim von Ribbentrop’s roles in German‐British (1936‐1939) relations and German‐Soviet relations (1939‐1941) • Describe German/Hitler foreign policy goals “race and space,” Lebensraum, Drang nach Osten • Describe “Anschluss” with Austria; Sudetenland Crisis; Protectorate of Bohemia‐Moravia • Define and explain significance of the following: German‐Polish non‐ aggression pact, Hossbach Conference, Munich Agreement; Recognize Hermann Göring, Joseph Goebbels, Sir Nevile Henderson, Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Vyacheslav Molotov, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler Need to Know • Be able to explain, paraphrase, compare, distinguish, interpret, summarize • Assessed through writing, multiple choice, and in some cases, ordering events • Explain the “Wrong War” thesis from the documentary, The Nazis: A Warning from History; Explain Hitler’s foreign policy goals • Explain how the results of the Sudetenland Crisis and Munich Agreement influenced Hitler’s decisions in 1939 • Explain how Nazi‐Soviet Non‐Aggression Pact and Rome‐Berlin Axis influenced Hitler’s goals • Interpret how Hitler’s assessment of British diplomacy and potential threat influenced his decision‐making between 1937‐1939 • Paraphrase Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill’s assessment of the Munich Agreement • Place in correct order major developments in events leading to origins of WWII in Europe and against the USSR (1933‐1941) Big Ideas (Formulated as Questions) • Be able to interpret, evaluate, differentiate, organize, construct, formulate • Assessed through writing, discussion, debate • How accurate is the interpretation offered by the documentary, The Nazis: A Warning from History, The Wrong War? • What were German and British intentions between 1937‐1939? • What sort of risks did Adolf Hitler believe that he was taking before September 1939? Origins of World War II (Total War Era, 1914‐1945) 30 Jan. Hitler appointed Chancellor of Germany 26 Jan. Germany & Poland sign a ten year non‐ 14 Oct. Germany leaves the Disarmament Conference aggression pact leaving impression that Germany and the League of Nations raising concerns that seeks peace at least for ten years 1933 Germany was repudiating a path of reconciliation. 2 Aug. Hitler combines office of president & chancellor 1934 16 Mar. Germany repudiates military limitations of the Versailles Treaty 7 Mar. Hitler denounces Locarno Treaty & 1935 11 Apr Stresa Front formed between France, Great remilitarizes the Rhineland; Britain and France Britain, and Italy publicly denounce 18 Jun. Anglo‐German Naval Agreement raises 9 Sep. Four Year Plan inaugurated; goal to make 1936 questions about British commitment to checking the German economy and military ready for war in German power on the European continent four years 3 Oct. Italian troops invade Ethiopia (Abyssinia) 14 Mar. Slovaks declare independence from 5 Nov. so‐called Hossbach Conference (see document) Czechs; encouraged by Germans; left Bohemia 1937 and Moravia isolated 4 Feb. Hitler makes himself Minister of War 15 Mar. Bohemia & Moravia "accept" Germany's 12 Mar. German troops occupy Austria protectorate status so Hitler can make it appear 1938 13 Mar. Anschluss with Austria declared; Germany that Germany did not invade annexed Austria; violated Treaty of Versailles & St. 31 Mar. Poles accept Anglo‐French offer of Germaine assistance; throughout spring and summer Hitler 24 Apr. Konrad Henlein, a Czech Nazi, demands and German diplomats accuse Poland of 1939 autonomy for the Sudeten Germans; supported by persecuting minority Germans, etc. Hitler and other top Nazis in Germany 3 Apr. Hitler orders preparation for military 30 May Hitler ordered military staff to develop a invasion of Poland (Operation White) plan to invade Czechoslovakia called "Fall Grün" 28 Apr. Hitler denounces German non‐ [Case Green] aggression pact with Poland 15 Sep. Chamberlain & Hitler meet at 22 May Germany & Italy sign "Pact of Steel“ to Berchtesgaden; Chamberlain agreed in principle that collaborate in military and economic goals Germany could have the Sudetenland region of 23 Aug. Nazi‐Soviet Non‐aggression Pact (a.k.a. Czechoslovakia Molotov‐Ribbentrop Agreement); publicly agree 22‐23 Sep. Chamberlain & Hitler meet at Bad to remain neutral and a secret protocol Godesberg to negotiate a deal that will provide for 29 Aug. German ultimatum to Poland; Germany the peaceful transfer of the Sudetenland to accused Poland of preparing to invade Germany; negotiations fall apart because Hitler 31 Aug. Germany falsely claims Poland attacked refused to accept terms such as an international several border towns in Germany; the most commission, plebiscites, etc. notorious example is Gleiwitz Radio Station 29 Sep. Munich Conference on Sudetenland; Hitler 1 Sep. German troops invade Poland agreed to the meeting for three reasons: large 3 Sep. France & Great Britain declare war on majority of Germans are not willing to support a war Germany to acquire the Sudetenland; the Italian government 17 Sep. Soviet troops invade Poland from the refuses to support Hitler if it meant war; German east generals inform Hitler that if Czechoslovakia puts up 27 Sep. Warsaw surrenders a defense and the British and French attack from the 27 Sep. Hitler decides to attack western Europe West, Germany will not have enough munitions. 29 Sep. Germany & USSR divide Poland 1‐10 Oct. German occupation of the Sudetenland 30 Nov. Russo‐Finnish War begins 9 Apr. German invasion of Denmark & Norway 1940 10 May German invasion of Netherlands, Belgium, & 6 Apr. Germany invades Yugoslavia & Greece France 22 Jun. Germany invades the USSR 10 Jun. Italy declared war against France and Great 13 Jul. Great Britain and USSR reach a mutual aid 1941 Britain pact 22 Jun. French surrender to Germans 7 Dec. Japan attacks Hawaii and the Philippines 16 Jul. Hitler orders attack on Great Britain 31 Jul. Hitler 8 Dec. US declares war on Japan decides to invade the USSR by spring 1941 11 Dec. Hitler declares war on the United States 18 Dec. Hitler calls for plans to invade the USSR (Operation Barbarossa).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the Captured German Records at the National Archives
    THE KNOW YOUR RECORDS PROGRAM consists of free events with up-to-date information about our holdings. Events offer opportunities for you to learn about the National Archives’ records through ongoing lectures, monthly genealogy programs, and the annual genealogy fair. Additional resources include online reference reports for genealogical research, and the newsletter Researcher News. www.archives.gov/calendar/know-your-records The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is the nation's record keeper. Of all the documents and materials created in the course of business conducted by the United States Federal government, only 1%–3% are determined permanently valuable. Those valuable records are preserved and are available to you, whether you want to see if they contain clues about your family’s history, need to prove a veteran’s military service, or are researching an historical topic that interests you. www.archives.gov/calendar/know-your-records December 14, 2016 Rachael Salyer Rachael Salyer, archivist, discusses records from Record Group 242, the National Archives Collection of Foreign Records Seized, and offers strategies for starting your historical or genealogical research using the Captured German Records. www.archives.gov/calendar/know-your-records Rachael is currently an archivist in the Textual Processing unit at the National Archives in College Park, MD. In addition, she assists the Reference unit respond to inquiries about World War II and Captured German records. Her career with us started in the Textual Research Room. Before coming to the National Archives, Rachael worked primarily as a professor of German at Clark University in Worcester, MA and a professor of English at American International College in Springfield, MA.
    [Show full text]
  • The German-American Bund: Fifth Column Or
    -41 THE GERMAN-AMERICAN BUND: FIFTH COLUMN OR DEUTSCHTUM? THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By James E. Geels, B. A. Denton, Texas August, 1975 Geels, James E., The German-American Bund: Fifth Column or Deutschtum? Master of Arts (History), August, 1975, 183 pp., bibliography, 140 titles. Although the German-American Bund received extensive press coverage during its existence and monographs of American politics in the 1930's refer to the Bund's activities, there has been no thorough examination of the charge that the Bund was a fifth column organization responsible to German authorities. This six-chapter study traces the Bund's history with an emphasis on determining the motivation of Bundists and the nature of the relationship between the Bund and the Third Reich. The conclusions are twofold. First, the Third Reich repeatedly discouraged the Bundists and attempted to dissociate itself from the Bund. Second, the Bund's commitment to Deutschtum through its endeavors to assist the German nation and the Third Reich contributed to American hatred of National Socialism. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION... ....... 1 II. DEUTSCHTUM.. ......... 14 III. ORIGIN AND IMAGE OF THE GERMAN- ... .50 AMERICAN BUND............ IV. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BUND AND THE THIRD REICH....... 82 V. INVESTIGATION OF THE BUND. 121 VI. CONCLUSION.. ......... 161 APPENDIX....... .............. ..... 170 BIBLIOGRAPHY......... ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Crisis
    Page 7 Chapter 2 Munich: Anatomy of A Crisis eptember 28, 1938, “Black Wednesday,” dawned on a frightened Europe. Since the spring Adolf Hitler had spoken often about the Sudetenland, the western part of Czechoslovakia. Many of the 3 Smillion German-speaking people who lived there had complained that they were being badly mistreated by the Czechs and Slovaks. Cooperating closely with Sudeten Nazis, Hitler at first simply demanded that the Czechs give the German-speakers within their borders self-government. Then, he upped the ante. If the Czechs did not hand the Sudetenland to him by October 1, 1938, he would order his well-armed and trained soldiers to attack Czechoslovakia, destroy its army, and seize the Sudetenland. The Strategic Location of the Sudetenland Germany’s demand quickly reverberated throughout the European continent. Many countries, tied down by various commitments and alliances, pondered whether—and how—to respond to Hitler’s latest threat. France had signed a treaty to defend the Czechs and Britain had a treaty with France; the USSR had promised to defend Czechoslovakia against a German attack. Britain, in particular, found itself in an awkward position. To back the French and their Czech allies would almost guarantee the outbreak of an unpredictable and potentially ruinous continental war; yet to refrain from confronting Hitler over the Sudetenland would mean victory for the Germans. In an effort to avert the frightening possibilities, a group of European leaders converged at Munich Background to the Crisis The clash between Germany and Czechoslovakia over the Sudetenland had its origins in the Versailles Treaty of 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Indictment Presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945)
    Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) Caption: On 18 October 1945, the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg accuses 24 German political, military and economic leaders of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Source: Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal sitting at Berlin on 18th October 1945. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, November 1945. 50 p. (Cmd. 6696). p. 2-50. Copyright: Crown copyright is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the Queen's Printer for Scotland URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/indictment_presented_to_the_international_military_tribunal_nuremberg_18_october_1945-en- 6b56300d-27a5-4550-8b07-f71e303ba2b1.html Last updated: 03/07/2015 1 / 46 03/07/2015 Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS — AGAINST — HERMANN WILHELM GÖRING, RUDOLF HESS, JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, ROBERT LEY, WILHELM KEITEL, ERNST KALTEN BRUNNER, ALFRED ROSENBERG, HANS FRANK, WILHELM FRICK, JULIUS STREICHER, WALTER FUNK, HJALMAR SCHACHT, GUSTAV KRUPP VON BOHLEN UND HALBACH, KARL DÖNITZ, ERICH RAEDER, BALDUR VON SCHIRACH, FRITZ SAUCKEL, ALFRED JODL, MARTIN BORMANN, FRANZ VON PAPEN, ARTUR SEYSS INQUART, ALBERT SPEER, CONSTANTIN VON NEURATH, AND HANS FRITZSCHE,
    [Show full text]
  • Theory in Nazi Occupied Denmark Katherine Greenwood [email protected]
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) Spring 5-2016 “Not With an Iron Fist, But With a Velvet Glove”: The Go‘ od Germans’ Theory in Nazi Occupied Denmark Katherine Greenwood [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Greenwood, Katherine, "“Not With an Iron Fist, But With a Velvet Glove”: The Good‘ Germans’ Theory in Nazi Occupied Denmark" (2016). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 2192. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2192 “Not With an Iron Fist, But With a Velvet Glove”: The ‘Good Germans’ Theory in Nazi Occupied Denmark By Katherine Greenwood Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts Department of History Seton Hall University May 2016 © 2016 Katherine Greenwood Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter I: “On principle we will do our utmost to make the operation appear as a peaceful occupation.” ................................................................................................................................. 3 Chapter II: “The canary bird of a murderer.” .............................................................................. 11 Chapter III: “I gather a situation
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • An Incomplete Look at Appeasement
    Lindsay W. Michie. Portrait of an Appeaser: Robert Hadow, First Secretary in the British Foreign Office, 1931-1939. Westport, Conn. and London: Praeger, 1996. xiv + 166 pp. $57.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-275-95369-0. Reviewed by John E. Moser Published on H-Diplo (November, 1998) In Portrait of an Appeaser, Lindsay Michie of‐ the rise of Nazism in Germany with some con‐ fers readers a study of her grandfather, Robert cern, but saw it as an understandable reaction to Henry Hadow, a British diplomat who served in that country's diplomatic ostracism, economic de‐ Vienna, Prague, and London in the 1930s. As the pression, and the threat of Communism. More‐ title suggests, Hadow was unflinching in his sup‐ over, he downplayed the risk of Austrian absorp‐ port of appeasement of Germany. As Michie tion into Germany, claiming that "conservative, writes, "[Hadow] shared the majority of the char‐ nationalist and particularly Christian-Social politi‐ acteristics associated with appeasement and re‐ cal opinion" in Austria reacted negatively to "at‐ mained loyal to this policy through the outbreak tempts to dictate Austrian policy from Berlin" (pp. of war in 1939 ..., to the point of indiscretion and 18-19). risk to his position and career" (pp. 1-2). In 1934 Hadow was transferred to Czechoslo‐ Michie attributes Hadow's support for ap‐ vakia, where he quickly distinguished himself as peasement to his fear of war, distrust of the a strong critic of the Benes government (blaming French, his emotional attachment to the British Benes for creating a "war neurosis" among the Empire, and his hostility to Communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Joachim Von Ribbentrop – Guilty
    Joachim von Ribbentrop – Guilty Nadia Schreiber and Derek Whelan 00403839/00392163 International Law – PSCI 236 Professor Morrison April 28, 2010 Prosecution Brief 2472/2500 I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment. – Nadia Schreiber and Derek Whelan Page 1 Joachim von Ribbentrop was one of the top officials in the Nazi Party during the Holocaust. His early career involved time fighting in the German Army during World War 1, and then working as a salesman in Berlin. In 1932, Ribbentrop joined the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSDAP), and in 1933 Ribbentrop became Hitler’s foreign affairs advisor. Ribbentrop was crucial in Hitler’s becoming the Chancellor in Germany (one of the factors that enabled Hitler to become the leader he ultimately did). Ribbentrop was disliked by many of the older members of the Party who felt that he had moved up the ranks too quickly. Because of this dislike, Ribbentrop was determined to win the affection and admiration of Hitler, and would do anything to accomplish this goal.1 Part of his compensation involved becoming a fanatical Nazi, to the point where other members of the party thought of him as more radical than Hitler himself.2 We will prove to you that Joachim von Ribbentrop is guilty on all four counts of the indictment: involvement in a common plan or conspiracy to commit crimes of war, crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. One of Ribbentrop’s main grounds of defense is that, throughout the war, he was acting under duress. We will therefore also prove that he was not under duress, and that even if he was, his actions were so unconscionable that duress cannot be a legitimate defense.
    [Show full text]
  • At Zero Hour: the Government of Karl Dönitz, with Reflections As Seen in German Literature
    AT ZERO HOUR: THE GOVERNMENT OF KARL DÖNITZ, WITH REFLECTIONS AS SEEN IN GERMAN LITERATURE Jonathan Edward Klein A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Committee: Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor, History Theodore Rippey, Advisor, German Douglas Forsyth Kristie Foell ii ABSTRACT Drs. Beth Griech-Polelle and Theodore Rippey, Advisors With the suicide of Adolf Hitler at the end of April 1945, leadership of the Third Reich was passed, as per Hitler’s Testament, to Karl Dönitz. Dönitz had, up to that point, served as head of the U-boat or submarine fleet, and then as Grand Admiral of the entire German Navy, or Kriegsmarine. Very little analysis has been offered in current literature regarding the impact of the Dönitz government. Indeed, history texts rarely mention it. This thesis set out to do just that, using both historically oriented works and insights as provided by German literature of the period such as Heimkehrerliteratur and Trümmerliteratur. By investigating the works of Dönitz himself and those of various other personalities associated with his government, primary documents of the period, and secondary works on the period as well as the aforementioned literature genres, several conclusions were reached. The activities of the Dönitz government can be broken up into pre-surrender and post- surrender activities. Pre-surrender activities included the negotiations of surrender itself, which insofar as it was conducted in several stages, was not unconditional, as is often claimed. The other major pre-surrender activity was the decision to continue the war in the East while seeking peace with the West to allow evacuation of Germans from East Prussia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths About German War Crimes Then and Now
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern University Honors Program Theses 2020 The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths about German War Crimes Then and Now Narayan J. Saviskas Jr. Georgia Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses Part of the European History Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Saviskas, Narayan J. Jr., "The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths about German War Crimes Then and Now" (2020). University Honors Program Theses. 474. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses/474 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Clean Wehrmacht: Myths about German War Crimes Then and Now An Honors Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of History. By Narayan Saviskas Under the mentorship of Dr. Brian Feltman. ABSTRACT On October 1st, 1946, the Nuremberg high command trails ended. The executions and life sentences of representatives of the German military and political elite were carried out by the Allied powers. At the time, the Soviet Union posed a greater threat than the Germans tried at Nuremberg. Years later, on October 9th, 1950, former officers of the German military gathered in Himmerod Abbey. Together they wrote the Himmerod Memorandum, which laid the foundation of the German rearmament and called for the release of German soldiers (Wehrmacht) and Schutzstaffel (SS) members convicted of war crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Hamilton: a British Scholar in Nazi Germany
    fascism 5 (2016) 177-200 brill.com/fasc Louis Hamilton: A British Scholar in Nazi Germany Grant W. Grams Athabasca University [email protected] Abstract Louis Hamilton (1879–1948) was a British national that lectured at various institutions of higher learning in Berlin from 1904–1914, and 1919–1938. During the Third Reich (1933–1945) Hamilton was accused of being half-Jewish and his continued presence at institutions of higher learning was considered undesirable. Hamilton like other foreign born academics was coerced to leave Germany because the Nazi educational system viewed them as being politically unreliable. Hamilton’s experiences are an illustration of what foreign academics suffered during the Third Reich. The purpose of this article is to shed new light on the fate of foreign academics in Nazi Germany. Although the fate of Jewish professors and students has been researched non-Jewish and non-Aryan instructors has been a neglected topic within the history of Nazism. Keywords fascism – Aryan – foreigners – academics – intimidation – Germany – anti-Semitism – Louis Hamilton (1879–1948) Louis Hamilton (1879–1948) was a British national that had a remarkable career lecturing in Germany during the Kaiser Reich (1871 to 1918), Weimar Republic (1919–1933), and the early stages of the Nazi era (1933–1945). Between the two world wars academics in Europe, North America, private institutions, and the German government cited Hamilton as an authoritative source on Canada.1 1 National Archive of Canada (hereafter nac) c10234 File 307724: North German Lloyd to Egan Department of Immigration and Colonization (hereafter dic), 3 Aug. 1928; nac c10234 File 307724: dic to Egan dic, 21 July, 1927; Bundesarchiv Koblenz (hereafter bak) zsg1– 142–20 1922: Verein für das Deutschtum in Ausland Jahrbuch für 1922, 168; Hermann Wagner, Von Küste zu Küste: Bei deutschen Auswanderer in Kanada (Hamburg: Verlag der Ev.
    [Show full text]
  • "DON't ACCEPT" HITLER TELLS HENLEIN? Weather FINAL FORECAST—COOLER EDITION Winnipeg Wheat OCTOBER CLOSE 59 VOL
    "DON'T ACCEPT" HITLER TELLS HENLEIN? Weather FINAL FORECAST—COOLER EDITION Winnipeg Wheat OCTOBER CLOSE 59 VOL. XXXI.—No. 226. LETHBEIDGE, ALBERTA, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 193S 12 PAGES NEGOTIATIONS BROKEN OFF Hold Out For Breakdown More Advice Caused By Of Dictator? Border Clash High Nazi Government Spokesman at Nuremberg Sudeten Deputies Reported to Have Been Assaulted Gives Purport of Hitler's Admonition to the by Czech Police — No Further Negotiations Sudeten German Leader—Deputy Leaves Pending Thorough Investigation—Situ­ for Conference With Fuehrer ation Out of Goverment's Hands Marseilles Dockworkers Mobilized Czech Border Guards Fired Upon PARIS, Sept. 7.— (A.P.)—The government tonight announced PRAHA, Sept. 7.—(C.P.-Havas)—Press reports from Linhartox, mobilization of all dockworkers at the Mediterranean port of Mar­ in the Jaegernsdorf district of Czechoslovakia, tonight said Czecho­ seilles, vital link in the French system of defence. slovak frontier guards were fired upon by five men they discovered This step, placing an estimated 5,000 longshoremen under military attempting to cross into the republic from Germany. discipline and control, followed a cabinet decree patting the port under military jurisdiction. News of the alleged incident arrived here almost simultaneausly The mobilization of workers will be effected under the law for with reports, not officially confirmed, that 300 Germans had been the organization of France in time of war which was voted by parlia­ surprised last night while smuggling arms across the frontier near ment on July 11. Moravska Ostrava. Fifty-three were said to have been arrested. UREMBERG, Germany, Sept. 7—(A.P.)—A high gov­ RAHA, Sept.
    [Show full text]