Rail Baltica ‘Bottlenecks’ to Improving Safety

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rail Baltica ‘Bottlenecks’ to Improving Safety TECHNICAL ARTICLE AS PUBLISHED IN The Journal October 2018 Volume 136 Part 4 If you would like to reproduce this article, please contact: Alison Stansfield MARKETING DIRECTOR Permanent Way Institution [email protected] PLEASE NOTE THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS JOURNAL ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF THE EDITOR OR OF THE INSTITUTION AS A BODY. TECHNICAL AUTHOR: Phil Kirkland What in Head of Maintenance Delivery Nexus the world…? Tyne and Wear Metro PWI Vice President for England (North) An occasional look at some significant rail infrastructure developments overseas with the intention of ‘inspiring and exciting’ both today’s and tomorrow’s railway infrastructure engineers. Image free-issue, (courtesy of Wikimedia permissions) 56 TECHNICAL Latvian Railways was becoming concerned at times, were worn out which resulted in the Project of the its ability to sustain good quality infrastructure introduction of widespread speed restrictions services for the ever growing volume of on those areas. Track materials in some transit traffic volumes. To tackle the most areas including rails, fastenings and fixtures, Century: critical problems, such as deterioration of sleepers and ballast, level crossings, earth the tracks and the declining level of safety, a embankments, structures and track drainage comprehensive programme of reconstruction systems were life-expired. Therefore the and modernisation began in 1998 to increase most urgent replacement of 340km track speed and track capacity by eliminating sections was initiated. Latvian Railways is Rail Baltica ‘bottlenecks’ to improving safety. After joining now executing further works on replacement the EU in 2004, meeting the requirements for of the next 260km of track. The total volume INTRODUCTION elimination of hazardous material impact on the cost of this project is approximately €89 environment became a high priority of Latvian million including a 52% EU co-financing Rail Baltica is a greenfield rail transport Railways, opening new perspectives, but at the plan. Suppliers were chosen in international infrastructure project aiming to integrate the same time setting new, stringent conditions for tenders and are representing Sweden, Russia, Baltic States in the European rail network. The railway operations. Germany and Latvia. project encompasses five European Union countries, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia Despite Rail Baltica, modernisation of the East- An example of excellent cooperation with an and indirectly also Finland. The project will West railway corridor is still a significant part international team is the construction of the connect cities such as Helsinki, Tallin, Riga, of Latvia’s National Transport Development second reception yard at Rezekne station, Panevežys, Kaunas, Vilnius and Warsaw. The Programme, aimed at supporting the currently used as a border station. Baltic part of the Rail Baltica project is also development of transit traffic, to strengthen the referred to as the Rail Baltica Global Project development of multi-modal transport in the The total area of the new reception yard is 7.3 and is one of the priority transport projects of East-West direction and to support cooperation ha and includes six arrival/departure tracks the European Union. with neighbouring countries and integration of 1,050m usable length, sidings and dead- into the European transport system. end tracks. The total length of constructed NORTH – SOUTH RAILWAY AXIS tracks is 8.9km and the total number of Collaboration with Russia and Belarus (being installed turnouts is 27. All tracks were made Rail Baltic is also the symbolic return of the non-EU neighbours) is based not only on the of continuously welded rails (CWR) provided Baltic States to Europe. Up until World War 2, common 1520mm railway gauge but also by Austrian company Voestalpine Schienen the Baltic States were connected to Europe on the longstanding economic interests. For GmbH. The new yard facilitates the arrival and with a standard 1435mm gauge railway. example, an agreement was reached with handling of long freight trains with up to 74 Following the war the Baltic States were firmly Belarus on concurrent building of a second wagons. tied into a 1520mm Soviet gauge railway, track on both sides of the border to increase orientated on an East – West railway axis. cargo flows. Also completed is another project named Typically, such as The East-West Railway ‘Replacement of turnouts on East-West corridor through Latvia is a route of At the end of last decade, technical surveys corridor’. Currently, 626 sets of turnouts have international importance, being part of the on various sections of the East-West railway been replaced from 768. VAE GmbH is the Trans-European Network (TEN). It is one of the corridor identified very poor railway track supplier of the turnouts, totalling busiest freight traffic corridors in the region. conditions. Some sections, laid in the Soviet €35.2 million. Image 1: 120ft (36m) track panel-laying crane UK25 East-West railway upgrade Latvia Image courtesy LDZ (Latvijas Dzelcels) 57 TECHNICAL Image 2: Soviet era Balashenko ballast cleaning (harvesting) machine. Image courtesy of V.Kh. Balashenko Representatives from the United States and Similarly, LDZ (Latvian Railways) are currently considered for another twenty years, they will from NATO’s Force Integration Unit in Latvia finalising a business case in order to secure form the centre piece of the Latvian part of the had also begun evaluating the infrastructure further EU funding in order to electrify the route. operated by Latvian national rail company, Riga – Rezekne corridor in order to make the LDZ. The planned investments foresaw Latvian unit transit cost more appealing. NORTH – SOUTH RAILWAY the construction of new sidings, renovating current sidings, extending the loading and The statistics of the Rail Baltica project are AXIS AND TECHNICAL unloading site at Garkalne Station, as well quite staggering: SPECIFICATIONS as other modernisation and infrastructure improvement works. More than EUR 1 million • The largest Baltic region infrastructure Initially two options were considered. Both was invested for these projects in order to project in the last 100 years options included an upgrade of the existing support and ensure allied cargo shipments in • A 10 year construction period railway (with standard gauge) to 160 km/h (99 accordance with NATO standards, LDZ had • Environmentally friendly electrified mph) for the stretch that runs from Warsaw already invested EUR 200,000 in improving its railway via Białystok and Ełk to Trakiszki, followed by infrastructure. Already now LDZ infrastructure • 870Km of new high speed passenger / a new railway with standard gauge Trakiszki– is used to transport non military cargo to freight railway Kaunas. For the remainder of the route to Afghanistan, as well as transporting military • Maximum speed 240km/h passenger Tallinn two different options were considered: equipment participating in military exercises in trains, 120km/h freight trains the region. • Investment exceeding Euro 5 Billion • Option one was to upgrade the existing • Financed by EU(CEF), Estonia, Latvia railway from Joniškis via Riga and Tartu Today, most freight traffic in the Baltics and Lithuania to Tallinn to 160 km/h, keeping the current originates from the Commonwealth of • Enabling intermodality and multimodality 1520mm Russian gauge and state-owned, Independent States (CIS) formed when the o Three Multimodal terminals connected and a new railway from Kaunas–Joniškis with former Soviet Union (now Russia) totally to airports and seaports: 160 km/h, also at 1520mm Russian gauge and dissolved in 1991. At its conception it consisted - Muuga-Estonia, state-owned. of ten former Soviet Republics: Armenia, - Salaspils-Latvia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, - Kaunas-Lithuania Because of the break of gauge at Kaunas, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, • Seven railway passenger stations passengers would have to change trains and Uzbekistan. The 1520mm system makes connected to airports and seaports: there. For freight, a reloading facility or a it difficult and costly to interconnect the Baltic - Tallinn (for Helsinki, Finland) bogie exchange station would be placed near States with the rest of the EU via Poland. - Parnu Kaunas. Consensus was to therefore fully integrate - Riga Central Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania into the single - Riga Airport • Option two was a new railway with 240 European railway area, eliminating the missing - Panevežys km/h speed 1435mm standard gauge from link of the EU’s North Sea – Baltic TEN-T Core - Kaunas (for Warsaw, Poland) Kaunas via Joniškis to Riga, as above, but Network Corridor. East-West transit has been - Vilnius then continuing in a shorter, straighter line via reducing lately with Russia rerouting cargo Pärnu to Tallinn. This option was chosen as the via its own Baltic ports and Lithuania securing For many, the Latvian sector of the route is preferred route. significant volumes of Belarussian cargo. exciting due to the fact that two significant The result is that modernisation works are station developments are planned at Riga Rail Baltica will actually be a new 870km not only driven by asset condition, but also and Riga Airport. Long awaited developments fast, but conventional double-track, 25Kv AC through traffic flows and market requirements. and without this project wouldn’t even be electrified and ETRMS L2 traffic management- equipped railway line, with a maximum design 58 TECHNICAL
Recommended publications
  • Fourth Report to the Council and the European Parliament on Monitoring Development in the Rail Market
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.6.2014 COM(2014) 353 final PART 1/2 REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market {SWD(2014) 186 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Evolution of internal market in rail services................................................................ 4 1.1. The objectives of the White Paper on Transport (2011).............................................. 4 1.2. The passenger rail market today .................................................................................. 5 1.3. Evolution of the passenger rail market......................................................................... 8 1.4. The rail freight market today........................................................................................ 9 1.5. Evolution of the rail freight market.............................................................................. 9 2. Evolution of the internal market in services to be supplied to railway undertakings 11 2.1. Stations....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Stations across the European Union........................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Ownership and management...................................................................................... 12 2.1.3. Access
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Corridor of the Trans-Asian Railway
    ERINA REPORT Vol. 58 2004 JULY The Northern Corridor of the Trans-Asian Railway Pierre Chartier Economic Affairs Officer, UNESCAP Background formulation of rail and road networks with an emphasis on The 1980s and early 1990s witnessed some dramatic minimizing the number of routes to be included in the changes in the political and economic environment of networks and making maximum use of existing countries in the UNESCAP region. Peace returned to infrastructure; (iii) a focus on the facilitation of land Southeast Asia, countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia transport at border crossings through the promotion of became independent and a number of countries adopted relevant international conventions and agreements as an more market-oriented economic principles. These changes, important basis for the development of trade and tourism; which resulted in more outward-looking policies, led to and (iv) the promotion of close international cooperation unprecedented growth in trade to and from the UNESCAP with other United Nations agencies, including UNECE and region, at a rate that was twice the global figure. In UNCTAD2, as well as other governmental and non- addition, a salient feature of the region's trade growth was governmental organizations such as the International Union the increasing significance of trade within the region itself. of Railways (UIC), the Organization for Railway Concomitantly, the number of journeys by people within Cooperation (OSJD), the International Road Union (IRU) the region to neighboring countries for both tourism and and the International Road Federation (IRF). business purposes also soared. Each of these developments increased demands on the region's transport and The Trans-Asian Railway component of ALTID.
    [Show full text]
  • VR Annual Report 1963
    1963 VICTORIA VICTORIAN RAILWAYS REPORT OF THE VICTORIAN RAILWAYS COMMISSIONERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 1963 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO ACT 7 ELIZABETH 11. No. 6355 By Authority: A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER, MELBOURNE. No. 19.-[68. 3n.].-12005/63. CONTENTS PAGE CoMMISSIONERs' REPORT l HEADS OF BRANCHES 2:3 APPENDICEs-­ APPENDIX Balance-sheet l 24 Financial Results (Totals), Summary of 2 26 Financial Results (Details), Summary of 2A 27 Reconciliation of Railway and Treasury Figures (Revenue and Working Expenses), 3 2H Working Expenses, Abstract of 4 2n Working Expenses and Earnings, Comparative Analysis of 5 :30 Total Cost of Each Line and of Rolling Stock, &c. 6 :p- General Comparative Statement for Last Fifteen Years 7 :3H Statistics : Passengers, Goods Traffic, &c. 8 41 Mileage : Train, Locomotive, and Vehicle 9 42 Salaries and Wages, Total Amount Paid 10 44 Staff Employed in Years Ended 30th June, 1963 and 1962 ll 45 Locomotives, Coaching Stock, Goods and Service Stock on Books 12 46 Railway Accident and Fire Insurance Fund ... 13 49 New Lines Opened for Traffic or Under Construction, &c. 14 iiO Mileage of Railways and Tracks 15 ;)] Railways Stores Suspense Account 16 iiz Railway Renewals and Replacements Fund 17 52 Depreciation-Provision and Accrual 18 52 Capital Expenditure in Years Ended 30th June, 1963 and 1962 19 ii3 Passenger Traffic and Revenue, Analysis of ... 20 ii4 Goods and Live Stock Traffic and Revenue, Analysis ot 21 55 Traffic at Each Station 22 ii6 His Excellency Sir Rohan Delacombe, Governor of Vi ctoria, and Lady Delacombe about to entrain at Spencer Street for a visit to western Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Border Crossing Practices in International Railway Transport
    STUDY ON BORDER CROSSING PRACTICES IN INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY TRANSPORT Bangkok, 2018 This study was prepared by Transport Division ESCAP. The draft of the study was prepared by Mr. Goran Andreev, Consultant, under the supervision of Mr. Sandeep Raj Jain, Economic Affairs Officer, Transport Facilitation and Logistics Section (TFLS), Transport Division. Overall guidance was provided by Mr. Li Yuwei, Director, Transport Division. The study extensively benefited from the visits made by the ESCAP study team to several border crossings (in chronological order): Sukhbaatar (Mongolia), Dong Dang (Viet Nam), Padang Besar (Malaysia), Sarkhas (Islamic Republic of Iran), Rezekne (Latvia). The assistance provided by the railways, customs and other authorities at these border crossings, their officers and staff for the study is duly appreciated. Acknowledgments are also extended to the representatives of Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and Organisation for Co- operation between Railways (OSJD), for their constructive comments on the draft Study and the contribution in providing valuable inputs on the publication. The views expressed in this guide are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in this guide are the responsibility of the authors, and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this study do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Standard Gauge
    The Myth of the Standard Guage: Rail Guage Choice in Australia, 1850-1901 Author Mills, John Ayres Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/426 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366364 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au THE MYTH OF THE STANDARD GAUGE: RAIL GAUGE CHOICE IN AUSTRALIA, 1850 – 1901 JOHN AYRES MILLS B.A.(Syd.), M.Prof.Econ. (U.Qld.) DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE & ECONOMICS GRIFFITH BUSINESS SCHOOL GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 ii ABSTRACT This thesis describes the rail gauge decision-making processes of the Australian colonies in the period 1850 – 1901. Federation in 1901 delivered a national system of railways to Australia but not a national railway system. Thus the so-called “standard” gauge of 4ft. 8½in. had not become the standard in Australia at Federation in 1901, and has still not. It was found that previous studies did not examine cause and effect in the making of rail gauge choices. This study has done so, and found that rail gauge choice decisions in the period 1850 to 1901 were not merely one-off events. Rather, those choices were part of a search over fifty years by government representatives seeking colonial identity/autonomy and/or platforms for election/re-election. Consistent with this interpretation of the history of rail gauge choice in the Australian colonies, no case was found where rail gauge choice was a function of the disciplined search for the best value-for-money option.
    [Show full text]
  • ILCAD 2016, 10 June in Riga and 11 June in Tallinn PROGRAMME (Draft)
    International Conference on “how to improve safety at and around level crossings” ILCAD 2016, 10 June in Riga and 11 June in Tallinn PROGRAMME (draft) 1. Riga, 10 June 2016 a. Venue: Latvian Railway Museum, Riga, Uzvaras bulv. 2A ; Latvia 09:30 – 10.00 – registration, welcome coffee (with compliments of OPTEX) www.optex-europe.com 10:00 – 10.50 – opening (official speeches, media/public event) Keynote Speakers : 1. Ministry of Transport (tbc) 2. SJSC “Latvian Railways”, Chairman of the Board and President, Mr. Edvins Berzins 3. UIC: Mr. Peter Gerhardt/Head of UIC Safety Unit 11.00 – 13.00 Presentations (1 st part) • 11:00-11:20 Agency TBWA Latvija: Mrs. Anna Ranc āne, Strategist; Mr. Edijs Vucens, Head of Media Arts: “SJSC “Latvian Railway” Safety Campaign “Don’t overestimate your abilities near railways”” • 11:20-11:40 University of Latvia: Mr. Ivars Austers, Professor of Social Psychology: “Railway crossing safety: Self-reported risk perception and behaviours in population of Latvia” • 11:40-12:00 Latvian Road Traffic Safety Directorate: Mrs. Valda Kjaspere: „Cooperation between different organizations in order to decrease number of accidents“ • 12:00-12:20 Operation Lifesaver Estonia (OLE): Mrs. Getter Toome: "Educational material for driving schools” • 12:20-12:40 PKP (Polish Railways): Mrs. Katarzyna Kucharek, “Activities at rail- road level crossings carried out in Poland” • 12:40-13:00 OPTEX, Mr. Dale Jones: “Lidar” to detect larger objects and vehicles” + product exhibited 13:00 – 14.00 – lunch (with compliments of LDz) + exhibition 14.00 – 16.00 – Presentations (2 nd part) • 14:00 – 14:30 Inspector Becky Warren , British Transport Police, UK Network Rail, UK: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Railway System
    ASIA THE CHINESE RAILWAY SYSTEM By H. STRINGER CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE WASON COLLECTION THIS BOOK IS THE GIFT OF Mrs. James McHugh Cornell University Library TF 101.S91 The Chinese railway system / 3 1924 023 644 143 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924023644143 THE CHINESE RAILWAY SYSTEM THE CHINESE RAILWAY SYSTEM By H. STRINGER, b.a., cantab., a.m.lc.e. Resident Engineer, Peking-Mukden Railway. SHANGHAI KELLY AND WALSH, LIMITED. HONGKONG-SINGAPORE-YOKOHAMA-HANKOW. 1922. .. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Railway History 1 II. Growth of the Railway Administration 27 III. The Government Railway System . 37 IV. Railways in Detail—Year 1918 . 74 V. The Economics of the Chinese Railways 107 VI. Pioneer Railway Location . 143 VII. The Case for Machinery on Railway Construction in China . 161 VIII. The Use of Reinforced Concrete on the Chinese Railways 177 IX. Construction Memoranda Peculiar to China 186 — ;; PREFACE This book is printed by order of the Board of Communications of the Chinese Government. I am greatly indebted to Mr. Tang Wen Kao, Director of the Peking-Mukden Railway and to Mr. L. J. Newmarch, Acting Engineer-in-Chief of the same line for making the necessary arrangements with the Board. The chapter on Pioneer Railway Location may perhaps be criticised as an irrelevancy. It is introduced to direct attention to a question of vast importance to a country which has practically all its railway future still before it, and also because location along pioneer lines is believed to be suited to existing financial conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr
    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL TRANS/WP.5/2002/1/Add.2 14 June 2002 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (Fifteenth session, 2- 4 September 2002, agenda item 5) DEVELOPMENT REGARDING TRANSPORT POLICIES Replies to the questionnaire on transport development Addendum 2 Transmitted by the Government of Latvia Note: At its fifty-ninth session the Inland Transport Committee, following an earlier decision taken at its fortieth session (ECE/TRANS/42, para. 45), agreed to circulate the questionnaire on the most significant criteria for the determination of new and important developments with regard to inland transport in the member countries of general interest to Governments (ECE/TRANS/119, para. 52). * * * TRANS/WP.5/2002/1/Add.2 page 2 I. General transport policy aspects 1. 1.1. The Government of the Republic of Latvia has two programmes on transport policy in general: - National Transport Development Programme (2000-2006 year) - Railway Transport Development State Programme (1995-2010 year) The “Declaration on the intended activities of the Cabinet of Ministers” envisages the following activities regarding the development of the transport system: - Creation of a stable and long-term road network financing system according to the principle adopted in the road sector that the road user pays for road use. The distribution of revenues from the excise duty on oil products has been achieved up until April 2002: 60% in the special State budget – the State Road Fund (SRF) and 40% in the State consolidated budget instead of the previous distribution of 50% / 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT OF ASIA - EUROPE RAIL CONTAINER TRANSPORT THROUGH BLOCK-TRAINS NORTHERN CORRIDOR OF THE TRANS-ASIAN RAILWAY UNITED NATIONS New York, 1999 CONTENTS Page Chapter 1: Introduction ………………………………………………………………… 1 Chapter 2: Routes of the TAR Northern Corridor ……………………………………... 7 Chapter 3: Assessment of Container Traffic Volumes ………………………………… 10 3.1. Assessment of Container Traffic Volumes …………………………. 10 3.2. Distribution of Container Traffic among TAR-NC Routes ………… 16 Chapter 4: Freight Forwarders’ Choice of « Best Route » …………………………….. 20 4.1. Definitions …………………………………………………………... 20 4.2. Business Environment of Container Traffic ………………………… 21 4.3. Selecting a Transport Mode / Choosing a Route ……………………. 25 4.3.1. Cost / Tariffs ……………………………………………….. 26 4.3.2. Transit Times ………………………………………………. 30 4.3.3. Level of Services …………………………………………... 34 Chapter 5: Proposed Guidelines for the Implementation of Actual Demonstration Runs of Container Block-Trains …………………………………………… 43 5.1. Compatibility of train assembly …………………………………….. 44 5.1.1. Number of wagons – Train length …………………………. 44 5.1.2. Wagon capacity …………………………………………….. 45 5.1.3. Maximum gross weight of trains …………………………... 46 5.2. The break-of-gauge issue …………………………………………… 47 5.3. Container handling capacity in ports and terminals ………………… 49 5.4. Composition of a container block-train ……………………………... 49 5.5. Train schedule ………………………………………………………. 50 5.5.1. Main-line operations ………………………………………. 50 5.5.2. Yard operations …………………………………………… 51 5.6. Border-crossing issues ……………………………………………… 54 5.7. Customs and border formalities …………………………………….. 56 5.8. Working Groups for operationalisation and monitoring of TAR-NC services ……………………………………………………………… 57 Chapter 6: Conclusion ………………………………………………………………..... 60 ANNEXES ………………………………………………………………………………… 63 Annex 1: Railway tariff policy for international freight transit traffic between North- East Asia and Europe …………………………………………..…………..
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Staff Working Document Impact
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 November 2017 (OR. en) 12442/17 Interinstitutional File: ADD 3 REV 1 2017/0237 (COD) TRANS 370 CODEC 1477 CONSOM 307 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 21 November 2017 To: Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2017) 318 final/2 Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation from the European Parliament and the Council on rail passengers' rights and obligations (recast) Delegations will find attached document SWD(2017) 318 final/2. Encl.: SWD(2017) 318 final/2 12442/17 ADD 3 REV 1 TA/el DGE 2A EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.11.2017 SWD(2017) 318 final/2 CORRIGENDUM This document corrects document SWD(2017) 318 final of 27.9.2017 Missing annexes are added The text shall read as follows: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation from the European Parliament and the Council on rail passengers' rights and obligations (recast) EN EN Table of Contents 1 WHAT IS THE PROBLEM AND WHY IS IT A PROBLEM? ........................... 5 1.1 Policy Context and Key Problems at Stake ................................................... 5 1.2 Description of the main problems linked to the current application of the rail passenger rights legislation (Part I) ........................................... 11 1.2.1 Major issues with the regulation .................................................................. 11 1.2.1.1 Problems linked to the scope of the rail passenger rights legislation (Exemptions) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CASE AT.39813 Baltic Rail ANTITRUST PROCEDURE Council
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition CASE AT.39813 Baltic rail (Only the English text is authentic) ANTITRUST PROCEDURE Council Regulation (EC) 1/2003 Article 7 Regulation (EC) 1/2003 Date: 02/10/2017 This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision is published in all EU languages in the Official Journal of the European Union. Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed. Those parts are replaced by a non-confidential summary in square brackets or are shown as […]. EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.10.2017 C(2017) 6544 final COMMISSION DECISION of 2.10.2017 relating to proceedings under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union AT.39813 - Baltic Rail (Only the English text is authentic) EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 8 2. Parties to the proceedings ............................................................................................. 8 2.1. The addressee of the decision ...................................................................................... 8 2.2. The complainant ........................................................................................................... 8 3. Procedure ...................................................................................................................... 9 4. Description of LG's practices which are the subject of this decision ........................
    [Show full text]