DOCSLIB.ORG

Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Lolo National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Lolo National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Lolo National Forest EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Forest Northern Region (R1) & Publication Number Publication Date Service Lolo National Forest R1-16-05 April 2016 Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Lolo National Forest Executive Summary Authors Alisa Wade, Consultant Christine Brick, Clark Fork Coalition Scott Spaulding, USFS R1 Traci Sylte, USFS Lolo National Forest Joan Louie, USFS R1 Please cite this report as: Wade, A.A., C. Brick, S. Spaulding, T. Sylte, and J. Louie. April 2016. Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Lolo National Forest. Publication Number R1-16-05. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Region and Lolo National Forest. 132 p. Full report available on-line at: http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/lolo/workingtogether. This report is a joint production of the USDA Forest Service Northern Region (R1) and Lolo National Forest. For further information, please contact: Traci Sylte Scott Spaulding Soil, Water, and Fisheries Program Manager Regional Fisheries Program Leader Lolo National Forest Northern Region (R1) 406.329.3896 406.329.3287 [email protected] [email protected] USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Lolo National Forest Page i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work arose in response to an inquiry from the Region 1 Office regarding Lolo National Forest’s interest in conducting a watershed vulnerability assessment. At a time of increasing demands and decreasing personnel and resources, this endeavor was made possible by partnering with the Clark Fork Coalition, which is given full credit for the Lolo National Forest’s ability to commit and produce this assessment. This report builds on the excellent previous vulnerability work conducted by: R1 (Gallatin and Helena); R2 (Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison, and White); R3 (Coconino); R4 (Sawtooth); R5 (Shasta-Trinity); R6 (Umatilla); R8 (Ouachita); R9 (Chequamegon-Nicolet), and R10 (Chugach) National Forests. These pilots were compiled with additional insights by Furniss and others (2013). We also thank D. Isaak, RMRS; S. Wenger, University of Georgia; and D. Nagel, RMRS for their generous help with data interpretation and development. A NOTE ABOUT TABLES AND FIGURES All tables and figures with alphanumeric designations (e.g., Table F.1) can be found within the body of this report. The letter represents the first letter of the report section name (e.g., F=Findings). All tables and figures designated with a only a number (e.g., Table 1, Figure 1) are not included in the body of this report, but are listed in Appendix 1 and 2, respectively. The tables and figures themselves can be found in the supplementary materials on the accompanying CD or on-line at http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/lolo/workingtogether. Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Lolo National Forest Page ii CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................ ii A Note About Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Approach .......................................................................................................................................................................... ES-2 Methods Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... ES-3 Findings ............................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 Management Implications ...................................................................................................................................... ES-27 Main Report ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Managing for Resilience in an Uncertain Future ........................................................................................... 3 2. Vulnerability: Conceptual Approach and Definitions .......................................................................................... 6 A Note About Uncertainty ............................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Methods ................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Methods Overview and Climate Data Used in this Assessment ............................................................. 10 3.1.1 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1.2 Conceptual Models and General Methods .............................................................................................. 10 3.1.3 Climate Data ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 3.2. Methods for Calculating Exposure and Sensitivity Metrics and Indices ............................................ 14 3.2.1 Aquatic Resources: Bull Trout Methods .................................................................................................. 14 3.2.2 Water Supply Methods ................................................................................................................................... 26 3.2.3 Infrastructure Methods .................................................................................................................................. 28 4. Findings ................................................................................................................................................................................ 32 4.1 Aquatic Resources: Bull Trout Findings ........................................................................................................... 32 4.1.1 Bull Trout Findings: Exposure ..................................................................................................................... 32 4.1.2 Bull Trout Findings: Sensitivity .................................................................................................................. 35 4.1.3 Bull Trout Findings: Vulnerability ............................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Water Supply: Sufficient Water Supply Findings ......................................................................................... 44 4.2.1 Water Supply Findings: Exposure .............................................................................................................. 44 4.2.2 Water Supply Findings: Sensitivity ........................................................................................................... 46 4.2.3 Water Supply Findings: Vulnerability ...................................................................................................... 47 Watershed Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Lolo National Forest Page iii 4.3. Infrastructure: Recreation Sites, Trails, and Roads Findings ................................................................. 48 4.3.1 Infrastructure Findings: Exposure ............................................................................................................ 48 4.3.2 Infrastructure Findings: Sensitivity .......................................................................................................... 49 4.3.3 Infrastructure Findings: Vulnerability ..................................................................................................... 57 5. Management Implications ............................................................................................................................................. 60 A Reminder About Uncertainty ................................................................................................................................... 60 5.1 Bull trout: Management Implications ............................................................................................................... 62 5.2 Water Supply: Management Implications ....................................................................................................... 65 5.3 Infrastructure: Management Implications ...................................................................................................... 67 Appendix 1. List of Tables in Supplementary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Photo Guide for Appraising Downed Woody Fuels in Montana Forests
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USDA FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT INT-96 NOVEMBER 1981 PHOTO GUIDE FOR APPRAISING DOWNED WOODY FUELS IN MONTANA FORESTS: Grand Fir- Larch-Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock, Western Hemlock-Western Redcedar, and Western Redcedar Cover Types William C. Fischer INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE OGDEN, UTAH 84401 THE AUTHOR WILLIAM C. FISCHER is a research forester for the Fire Effects and Use Research and Development Program, at the Northern Forest Fire Laboratory. His current assignment is to develop techniques and procedures for applying existing research knowledge to the task of producing improved operational fire management plans, with special emphasis on fire use, fuel treatment, and fuel management plans. Mr. Fischer received his bachelor's degree in forestry from the University of Michigan in 1956. From 1956 to 1966, he did Ranger District and forest staff work in timber management and fire control on the Boise National Forest. RESEARCH SUMMARY Four series of color photographs show different levels of ,downed woody material resulting from natural processes in four forest cover types in Montana. Each photo is supplemented by inventory data describing the size, weight, volume, and condition of the debris pictured. A subjective evaluation of potential fire behavior under an average bad fire weather situation is given. I nstructions are provided for using the photos to describe fuels and to evaluate potential fire hazard. USDA FOREST SERVICE GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT INT-96 NOVEM,BER 1981 PHOTO GUIDE FOR APPRAISING DOWNED WOODY FUELS IN MONTANA FORESTS: Grand Fir- Larch-Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock, We~tern Hemlock-Western Redcedar, and Western Redcedar Cover Types Will iam C.
    [Show full text]
  • IMBCR Report
    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Season
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College Spring 2014 Pilot Season Kelly Cousineau Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cousineau, Kelly, "Pilot Season" (2014). University Honors Theses. Paper 43. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.77 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pilot Season by Kelly Cousineau An undergraduate honorsrequirements thesis submitted for the degree in partial of fulfillment of the Bachelor of Arts in University Honors and Film Thesis Adviser William Tate Portland State University 2014 Abstract In the 1930s, two historical figures pioneered the cinematic movement into color technology and theory: Technicolor CEO Herbert Kalmus and Color Director Natalie Kalmus. Through strict licensing policies and creative branding, the husband-and-wife duo led Technicolor in the aesthetic revolution of colorizing Hollywood. However, Technicolor's enormous success, beginning in 1938 with The Wizard of Oz, followed decades of duress on the company. Studios had been reluctant to adopt color due to its high costs and Natalie's commanding presence on set represented a threat to those within the industry who demanded creative license. The discrimination that Natalie faced, while undoubtedly linked to her gender, was more systemically linked to her symbolic representation of Technicolor itself and its transformation of the industry from one based on black-and-white photography to a highly sanctioned world of color photography.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • UNSTOPPABLE in COMEDY and BEYOND Joan Rivers Never Shied from Taking Chances, and That’S No Laughing Matter
    REMEMBERING JOAN RIVERS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 Bob Chamberlin/ Los Angeles Times JOAN RIVERS often bantered with the audience as a host on “Fashion Police.” UNSTOPPABLE IN COMEDY AND BEYOND Joan Rivers never shied from taking chances, and that’s no laughing matter By Mary McNamara TELEVISION CRITIC ust as we long suspected, the only thing rible, Rivers, who died at age 81 on Thursday, that could stop Joan Rivers was death. created a kind of in-your-face, self-depreca- Abrasive, raunchy, self-immolating tion that both exploited the tendency toward J and often unapologetically offensive, self-hatred in comedy, particularly women’s Rivers changed comedy, courted con - comedy, and satirized it. troversy, survived catastrophe and refused to If as she grew older Rivers developed a rep- give up or give in, even when either of those utation for being more mean than funny — in might have seemed the best option. recent months, she was criticized for, among Known best for her grating, New York-af- other things, her remarks regarding Adele’s flicted tones, penchant for plastic surgery and weight, Palestinians and the Holocaust — willingness to tell anyone that they looked ter- she remained true to the brassy image and Remembering Joan Rivers take-no-prisoners attitude that allowed her to was impossible not to admire the indefatiga- rise during a time when the term “female co- ble spirit, the refusal to let anything soften or median” was almost an oxymoron. sag, including her very sharp tongue. Rivers famously wrote for Ed Sullivan and I remember seeing Rivers at the 2007 Os- then Phyllis Diller, appeared on “The Tonight cars, dressing down an official who was at- Show” when it was still hosted by Jack Paar, tempting to turn her away from the red carpet then became one of Johnny Carson’s guest because she wasn’t wearing her credentials.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Access Amendment 60 Day
    317 E. Spruce Street PO Box 7274 Missoula MT 59807 406 544-9863 [email protected] October 3, 2019 Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Ave, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-0003 Chief, U.S. Forest Service 201 14th Street, SW Washington D.C. 20250 Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 RE: 60-Day Notice of Intent to Sue under the Endangered Species Act- Idaho Panhandle National Forest, Kootenai National Forest and the Lolo National Forest You are hereby notified Alliance for the Wild Rockies, and Native Ecosystems Council (collectively Alliance) intend to file a citizen suit pursuant to the citizen suit provision of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g) for violations of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq. Alliance will file the suit after the 60 day period has run unless the violations described in this notice are remedied. The names, addresses, and phone numbers of the organizations giving notice of intent to sue are as follows: Michael Garrity, Executive Director Alliance for the Wild Rockies P.O. Box 505 Helena, Montana 59624 Tel: (406) 459-5936 Dr. Sara Jane Johnson, Executive Director Native Ecosystems Council P.O. Box 125 Willow Creek, MT 59760 Tel: (406) 285-3611 The names, addresses, and phone numbers of counsel for the notifier are as follows: Kristine M. Akland, Attorney at Law Akland Law Firm, PLLC P.O. Box 7472 Missoula, MT 59807 Tel: (406) 544-9863 NOTICE OF LEGAL VIOLATION THE AGENCIES MUST COMPLETE ESA CONSULTATION FOR THE 2011 ACCESS AMENDMENTS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTING TIMBER SALES IN THE IDAHO PANHANDLE, KOOTENAI AND LOLO NATIONAL FORESTS In November 2011, the Forest Service amended the Forest Plans of the Kootenai, Idaho Panhandle and Lolo National Forests to include wheeled motorized vehicle access and security standards.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021
    1 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 Alabama Tuskegee, National Forests in Alabama, dates 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Darrius Truss, [email protected] 404-550-5114 Double Springs, National Forests in Alabama, 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Shane Hoskins, [email protected] 334-314- 4522 Alaska Juneau, Tongass National Forest / Admiralty Island National Monument, 6/14/2021--8/13/2021 Project Contact: Don MacDougall, [email protected] 907-789-6280 Arizona Douglas, Coronado National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contacts: Doug Ruppel and Brian Stultz, [email protected] and [email protected] 520-388-8438 Prescott, Prescott National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Nina Hubbard, [email protected] 928- 232-0726 Phoenix, Tonto National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Brooke Wheelock, [email protected] 602-225-5257 Arkansas Glenwood, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501-701-3570 Mena, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501- 701-3570 California Mount Shasta, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 6/28/2021--8/6/2021, Project Contact: Marcus Nova, [email protected] 530-926-9606 Etna, Klamath National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/31/2021, Project Contact: Jeffrey Novak, [email protected] 530-841- 4467 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 2 Colorado Grand Junction, Grand Mesa Uncomphagre and Gunnison National Forests, 6/7/2021--8/14/2021 Project Contact: Lacie Jurado, [email protected] 970-817-4053, 2 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • March 7, 2021 | Third Sunday of Lent Mass Schedule Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday 7 A.M.| Saturday 8 A.M
    North American Martyrs Church March 7, 2021 | Third Sunday of Lent Mass Schedule Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday 7 a.m.| Saturday 8 a.m . and 4:30 p.m. (Vigil) | Sunday 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. PASTOR Rev. Frederick D. Fraini, III OFFICE STAFF Susan Zammarelli, Secretary Lisa Burkitt, Religious Ed. Director & Safety Environment Coordinator BAPTISMS: Contact the parish office to learn about our Call to Celebrate: Baptism Program. MARRIAGE: Contact the parish office at least 1 year in advance of the wedding date to make arrangements. ANOINTING OF THE SICK: If you have family members who are ill, anticipating surgery or weakened because of prolonged illness or advanced age, contact the parish office for assistance. CONFESSIONS: Saturday 3 - 3:45PM or by appointment in the parish hall. Please knock before entering the hall. Masks must be worn. During Lent, additional confessions will be held on Tuesday evenings from 7pm - 8pm. COMMUNION CALLS: Parishioners who are sick or disabled may call the parish office to arrange for the Holy Eucharist to be brought to them at home. COVID safety protocols are in place. RECTORY OFFICE HOURS Tuesday & Wednesday 12:30 p.m. -4:30 p.m. | Thursday 8 a.m. - 12 p.m. 8 Wyoma Dr. Auburn, MA 01501 | 508-798-8779 | www.namartyrsauburn.org Mass Intentions Stations of the Cross Saturday, March 6th The Stations of the Cross will be held Fridays 8:00a.m. William Kustra during Lent (with the exception of Good Friday) 4:30p.m. Gerald F. Falvey First Anniversary at 7pm in the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change: Results of National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Pilot Assessments
    D E E P R A U R T LT MENT OF AGRICU United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Assessing the Vulnerability General Technical Report PNW-GTR-884 of Watersheds to Climate July 2013 Change Results of National Forest Watershed Vulnerability Pilot Assessments The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, sexual ori- entation, marital status, family status, status as a parent (in education and training programs and activities), because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assis- tance program, or retaliation. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs or activities). If you require this information in alternative format (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), con- tact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (Voice or TDD). If you require information about this program, activity, or facility in a language other than English, contact the agency office responsible for the program or activity, or any USDA office. To file a complaint alleging discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Anton & Joan Louie, & Community Services Amendment Bill 2019
    Parliament House Anton & Joan Louie, 4 Harvest Terrace West Perth WA 6005 22nd July zo2a Attn: Legislative Committee Sub: Royal Commission into lnstitutional responses into Child SexualAbuse (Bill 157, Section 1248A), Recommendations 1.3 andZ.4 We are making this submission to object to the implementation of the Children & community services Amendment Bill 2019, which introduces amendments to the Children & Community Services Act 20A4, specifically Recommendations 7.3 and 7.4 of the final report by the Royal commission, which are contained in Clauses 51 to 53 of the Bill ZA1g. We wholeheartedly support the protection of children against any sort of abuse and especially against sexual abuse. However, we strongly feel the subject amendments to the Bill would be a mistake, ineffective ino discriminate against Catholics, should this amendment be passed into taw, for the following reasons: - ' Mistake - During the Sacrament of Confession, the victim can obtain healing, sound advice and counseling from the priest. However, if the priest is obligated to report the crime, a victim, who does not want the publicity, would choose to avoid discussing the abuse with a priest altogether. Currently, during the Sacrament of Confession, the victim knows that all Catholic priests have taken a Vow of confidentiality with regards to whatever is discussed during the Sacrament of Confession. lf the Recommendation 7.4 becames taw, the victim will once again be frustrated and could lead to suicide, at worst. Priests are a greai source of support for people with mental issues and many seek counseling during Confession. ' lneffective - lf a perpetrator does not wish to go to the police after committing this crime, the perpetrator would also avoid the Sacrament of Confession.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Recreational Trails Program Project Proposals
    2020 Recreational Trails Program Project Proposals Request RTP Request Organization Name Project Title Project Type Category Amount 1 Absaroka Beartooth Trail Stewardship Program: Hiring & Utilizing Trail Stewards and Non-Motorized Standard $37,522.00 Wilderness Foundation Volunteers to tackle Trail Maintenance projects in the Absaroka- Beartooth Wilderness Area 2 Anaconda Community Washoe Park Trail Phase II: Restoration on 0.13 miles of the trail of Non-Motorized Standard $33,221.24 Foundation a mile-long trail network in Anaconda-Deer Lodge 3 Back Country Horsemen of Volunteer Trail Maintenance on the CDT: Maintain the Continental Diversified Standard $66,300.00 Montana Divide National Scenic Trail in Montana and feeder trails 4 Beartooth Recreational Trails Winter Trail Maintenance: Winter Grooming on 5.3 miles of West Diversified Standard $20,000.00 Association Fork Road and 9.3 miles of trails on Aspen Ridge Ranch near Red Lodge 5 Big Sandy, Town of Town of Big Sandy Safe Route to Schools Project: Construction of Non-Motorized Standard $60,560.00 0.3 miles of trail connecting F. E. Miley Elementary School to existing trail infrastructure in Big Sandy 6 Big Sky Community Improvements to the Ousel Falls/US Forest Service Yellowmules Non-Motorized Standard $55,000.00 Organization trailhead to add infrastructure and improve land stewardship 7 Billings, City of Manufacture and installation of 105 wayfinding signs covering Non-Motorized Standard $36,390.00 nearly 10.5 miles of trails in Billings 8 Bitter Root Land Trust, Inc. Acquisition
    [Show full text]