Demonstrative Pronouns and Articles in Egyptian and Coptic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Demonstrative Pronouns and Articles in Egyptian and Coptic Demonstrative pronouns and articles in Egyptian and Coptic: emergence and development Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie am Fachbereich Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Maxim Kupreyev Berlin 2020 Erstgutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jochem Kahl Zweitgutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Tonio Sebastian Richter Tag der Disputation: 18.11.2020 Abstract Abstract This dissertation investigates the demonstratives in Old Egyptian. It proves that the proper description of the Old Kingdom deictic system delivers key insights into the emergence of the new proclitic forms pA, tA, nA, which later grammaticalize to definite articles. In order to define the features of the Old Kingdom demonstratives, I provide an in-depth introduction into the current methods of analysis of deixis and specificity. I further summarize the Egyptological research, dedicated to the demonstratives in Old Egyptian. Although the temporal frames of this study are confined to Old Kingdom, I deal extensively with the category of determination in Middle Egyptian, Demotic and Coptic. I extend the reviews with the commentaries, and introduce the original topics, such as determiner compatibilities and syntactic specificity effects. In preparation for the analysis of demonstratives in the Old Kingdom I provide the diachronic, diaphasic, and diastratic features of the core textual records. The analysis section embraces the typological and diatopic traits of Old Kingdom demonstratives, supplemented by the overview of the grammaticalization patterns of Afro-Asiatic deictic roots. I demonstrate the presence of two competing deictic systems in the Old Kingdom Egypt: one based on the joint attentional focus of the interlocutors, operating with pn as attention shifter and pw as attention tracker; and an alternative one, relying on the distance contrast, utilizing pf for a distal referent and pn for a proximal referent. The attentional system is visibly in decline in the literary discourse, the process possibly triggered by the arrival of the emphatic pf. It persists, however, in the colloquial stratum, as manifested by the emergence of the recognitional pA, tA, nA. The morphological features suggest that these are the allomorphs of the attention trackers pw, tw, nw, as proven by the change w → A in deictic and non-deictic lexemes containing the final w. I put forward the hypothesis that strong variants of pA, tA, nA, initially not distinguished from weak forms in writing, should have appeared after the proclitic forms were able to obtain stress. Syntactic features uncover the mechanism behind the pronominal conversion – the shift of enclitic demonstratives to the pre- nominal position. I challenge the established opinion that this front-movement was emphatic and conditioned by the “pusuit for expressivity”. The explanation, in my opinion, lies rather in a larger prosodic context, extending beyond the core phrase noun + demonstrative. My data show that demonstratives could be drawn to the front, abiding to the Wackernagel law, which demanded clitics to follow the first stressed unit in a sentence, e.g. verbs in the imperative. The prosodic features of the construction N + pw/tw + relative phrase, on the other hand, had an opposite effect: in it the enclitic pw/tw was detached from the noun to join a following prosodic unit of the relative phrase. This is the source construction for the strong pA/tA, as it allows demonstrative to obtain accentuation under the conditions of the “rule of three syllables”. Further, I consider the question why the bespoken grammatical phenomena were only sporadically attested in the literary sources of the Old Kingdom. I establish the comparative concepts to attribute the deictic features to the regions of Egypt, broadly defined as North and South. The deictic system of joint attention with pn/pw, the non-emphatic leftward movement of enclitic pw, and the “rule of three syllables” could be assigned to the northern dialects. The spatial deictic system with pn and pf, the fixed post-nominal position of the demonstratives, and the early adoption of the “rule of two syllables” characterized the southern linguistic type. The demonstrative pf was a relative newcomer in the North, while pA, being the pragmatic and morphological development of pw, gradually extended its outreach to the South. This pattern suggests that the Northern dialects shaped – at least in terms of deictica – the concept of a “literary norm” in Early Old Egyptian. The Old and Middle Egyptian standards were the product of the southern linguistic turn, occurring during the Fifth III Abstract Dynasty. Lastly, my analysis places Egyptian in a wider Afro-Asiatic linguistic context, tracing the Afro- Asiatic deictic roots as source morphemes for Egyptian demonstratives, personal and relative pronouns, non-verbal copulas and focus particles. In conclusion, I juxtapose the results of my study with some of the established tenets of article grammaticalization. I propose to reconsider the role of distance-related features and the acquisition of semantic definiteness for article development. Instead, I suggest that the system of joint attention provides a more fitting cognitive explanation for the genesis of the define article. IV It is impossible, under these circumstances, to say that ‘the material already collected is still insufficient’. What matters is not the amount of material, but the methods of investigation. V. Propp “Morphology of the folktale” V Table of contents Table of contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. X I. Tables .......................................................................................................................... XII II. Figures ......................................................................................................................... XV III. Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... XVI A) Quoted sources ..................................................................................................................... XVI B) Other ..................................................................................................................................... XIX 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 1.1. Revisiting the history of Egyptian demonstratives ..................................................................1 1.2. Synoptic outline of the chapters .............................................................................................3 1.3. Methodological observations on the diatopic analysis ...........................................................5 1.4. Diachronic, diaphasic and diatopic features of key textual sources ........................................8 2. Theoretical outline ...........................................................................................................12 2.1. Typological features of demonstratives ................................................................................ 12 2.1.1. Pragmatic features ....................................................................................................................... 13 Exophoric (situational) use ................................................................................................................. 13 Endophoric use .................................................................................................................................. 14 Anaphoric (tracking) use ................................................................................................................ 14 Discourse-deictic use ..................................................................................................................... 15 Recognitional use............................................................................................................................... 15 Emotive use ....................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.2. Semantic features......................................................................................................................... 16 Spatial features .................................................................................................................................. 16 Joint attention features...................................................................................................................... 18 Three-term deictic systems ............................................................................................................ 19 Two-term deictic systems .............................................................................................................. 23 Qualitative features ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.1.3 Syntactic features .......................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.4. Morphological features ................................................................................................................ 28 Deictic roots extended with non-deictic morphemes .........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • An Evaluation of Two Recent Theories Concerning the Narmer Palette1
    Eras Edition 8, November 2006 – http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/eras An Evaluation of Two Recent Theories Concerning the Narmer Palette1 Benjamin P. Suelzle (Monash University) Abstract: The Narmer Palette is one of the most significant and controversial of the decorated artefacts that have been recovered from the Egyptian Protodynastic period. This article evaluates the arguments of Alan R. Schulman and Jan Assmann, when these arguments dwell on the possible historicity of the palette’s decorative features. These two arguments shall be placed in a theoretical continuum. This continuum ranges from an almost total acceptance of the historical reality of the scenes depicted upon the Narmer Palette to an almost total rejection of an historical event or events that took place at the end of the Naqada IIIC1 period (3100-3000 BCE) and which could have formed the basis for the creation of the same scenes. I have adopted this methodological approach in order to establish whether the arguments of Assmann and Schulman have any theoretical similarities that can be used to locate more accurately the palette in its appropriate historical and ideological context. Five other decorated stone artefacts from the Protodynastic period will also be examined in order to provide historical comparisons between iconography from slightly earlier periods of Egyptian history and the scenes of royal violence found upon the Narmer Palette. Introduction and Methodology Artefacts of iconographical importance rarely survive intact into the present day. The Narmer Palette offers an illuminating opportunity to understand some of the ideological themes present during the political unification of Egypt at the end of the fourth millennium BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Palette of King Narmer Predynatic Egypt. C. 3000 – 2920 B. C. E
    13. Palette of King Narmer Predynatic Egypt. C. 3000 – 2920 B. C. E. Greywacke (2 images) Video at YouTube Article at Khan Academy Discovered (1898) among a group of sacred implements ritually buried in a deposit within an early temple of the falcon god Horus at the site of Hierakonpolis (the capital of Egypt during the pre-dynastic period), this large ceremonial object is one of the most important artifacts from the dawn of Egyptian civilization o Temple caches of this type are not uncommon. There was a great deal of focus on ritual and votive objects (offerings to the God) in temples. Every ruler, elite individual, and anyone else who could afford it, donated items to the temple to show their piety and increase their connection to the deity. After a period of time, the temple would be full of these objects and space would need to be cleared for new votive donations. However, since they had been dedicated to a temple and sanctified, the old items that needed to be cleared out could not simply be thrown away or sold. Instead, the general practice was to bury them in a pit under the temple floor o The "Main Deposit" at Hierakonpolis, where the Narmer Palette was discovered, contained many hundreds of objects, including a number of large relief-covered ceremonial mace-heads, ivory statuettes, carved knife handles, figurines of scorpions and other animals, stone vessels, and a second elaborately decorated palette 63.5 cm (more than 2 feet) in height and made of smooth greyish-green siltstone, is decorated on both faces with detailed low relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum
    Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from The British Museum Resource for Educators this is max size of image at 200 dpi; the sil is low res and for the comp only. if approved, needs to be redone carefully American Federation of Arts Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from The British Museum Resource for Educators American Federation of Arts © 2006 American Federation of Arts Temples and Tombs: Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum is organized by the American Federation of Arts and The British Museum. All materials included in this resource may be reproduced for educational American Federation of Arts purposes. 212.988.7700 800.232.0270 The AFA is a nonprofit institution that organizes art exhibitions for presen- www.afaweb.org tation in museums around the world, publishes exhibition catalogues, and interim address: develops education programs. 122 East 42nd Street, Suite 1514 New York, NY 10168 after April 1, 2007: 305 East 47th Street New York, NY 10017 Please direct questions about this resource to: Suzanne Elder Burke Director of Education American Federation of Arts 212.988.7700 x26 [email protected] Exhibition Itinerary to Date Oklahoma City Museum of Art Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 7–November 26, 2006 The Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens Jacksonville, Florida December 22, 2006–March 18, 2007 North Carolina Museum of Art Raleigh, North Carolina April 15–July 8, 2007 Albuquerque Museum of Art and History Albuquerque, New Mexico November 16, 2007–February 10, 2008 Fresno Metropolitan Museum of Art, History and Science Fresno, California March 7–June 1, 2008 Design/Production: Susan E.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”
    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL STATUES Including Sphinxes
    ROYAL STATUES Including sphinxes EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD Dynasties I-II Including later commemorative statues Ninutjer 800-150-900 Statuette of Ninuter seated wearing heb-sed cloak, calcite(?), formerly in G. Michaelidis colln., then in J. L. Boele van Hensbroek colln. in 1962. Simpson, W. K. in JEA 42 (1956), 45-9 figs. 1, 2 pl. iv. Send 800-160-900 Statuette of Send kneeling with vases, bronze, probably made during Dyn. XXVI, formerly in G. Posno colln. and in Paris, Hôtel Drouot, in 1883, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 8433. Abubakr, Abd el Monem J. Untersuchungen über die ägyptischen Kronen (1937), 27 Taf. 7; Roeder, Äg. Bronzefiguren 292 [355, e] Abb. 373 Taf. 44 [f]; Wildung, Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewußtsein ihrer Nachwelt i, 51 [Dok. xiii. 60] Abb. iv [1]. Name, Gauthier, Livre des Rois i, 22 [vi]. See Antiquités égyptiennes ... Collection de M. Gustave Posno (1874), No. 53; Hôtel Drouot Sale Cat. May 22-6, 1883, No. 53; Stern in Zeitschrift für die gebildete Welt 3 (1883), 287; Ausf. Verz. 303; von Bissing in 2 Mitteilungen des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung xxxviii (1913), 259 n. 2 (suggests from Memphis). Not identified by texts 800-195-000 Head of royal statue, perhaps early Dyn. I, in London, Petrie Museum, 15989. Petrie in Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland xxxvi (1906), 200 pl. xix; id. Arts and Crafts 31 figs. 19, 20; id. The Revolutions of Civilisation 15 fig. 7; id. in Anc. Eg. (1915), 168 view 4; id. in Hammerton, J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Configure the NFX250 Nextgen
    How to Configure the NFX250 NextGen Published 2021-04-20 ii Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net Juniper Networks, the Juniper Networks logo, Juniper, and Junos are registered trademarks of Juniper Networks, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks, service marks, registered marks, or registered service marks are the property of their respective owners. Juniper Networks assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies in this document. Juniper Networks reserves the right to change, modify, transfer, or otherwise revise this publication without notice. How to Configure the NFX250 NextGen Copyright © 2021 Juniper Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. The information in this document is current as of the date on the title page. YEAR 2000 NOTICE Juniper Networks hardware and software products are Year 2000 compliant. Junos OS has no known time-related limitations through the year 2038. However, the NTP application is known to have some difficulty in the year 2036. END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT The Juniper Networks product that is the subject of this technical documentation consists of (or is intended for use with) Juniper Networks software. Use of such software is subject to the terms and conditions of the End User License Agreement ("EULA") posted at https://support.juniper.net/support/eula/. By downloading, installing or using such software, you agree to the terms and conditions of that EULA. iii Table of Contents About This Guide | x 1 Overview NFX250
    [Show full text]
  • Escuela Técnica Superior De Ingenieros De Telecomunicación
    ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS DE TELECOMUNICACIÓN TRABAJO FIN DE GRADO GRADO EN INGENIERÍA DE TECNOLOGÍAS ESPECÍFICAS DE TELECOMUNICACIÓN MENCIÓN EN TELEMÁTICA APLICACIÓN ANDROID PARA EL ENTRENAMIENTO COGNITIVO DE PERSONAS BAJO TUTELA JURÍDICA CON DISCAPACIDAD INTELECTUAL O DEL DESARROLLO AUTOR: D. RAÚL VELASCO CAMINERO TUTORA: DRA. DÑA. MÍRIAM ANTÓN RODRÍGUEZ VALLADOLID, ENERO de 2017 TÍTULO: Aplicación Android para el entrenamiento cognitivo de personas bajo tutela jurídica con discapacidad intelectual o del desarrollo AUTOR: D. Raúl Velasco Caminero TUTORA: Dra. Dña. Míriam Antón Rodríguez DEPARTAMENTO: Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones e Ingeniería Telemática TRIBUNAL PRESIDENTE: Míriam Antón Rodríguez VOCAL: Mario Martínez Zarzuela SECRETARIO: David González Ortega SUPLENTE: Francisco Javier Díaz Pernas SUPLENTE: Mª Ángeles Pérez Juárez FECHA: CALIFICACIÓN: 3 Resumen El objetivo principal de este proyecto consiste en el desarrollo de una aplicación para la plataforma Android con el fin de tratar de mejorar las capacidades cognitivas de los tutelados a través de juegos desarrollados específicamente para tal fin. Aunque esta es la funcionalidad principal que se ofrece, la aplicación va más allá. Permite llevar un seguimiento de cada tutelado y crear y ver los detalles de los mismos. También permite ver estadísticas de los tutelados en los distintos juegos para ver su desarrollo y mejora. La aplicación es un sistema de seguimiento y rehabilitación donde los voluntarios introducen sus credenciales para poder acceder a todas las funcionalidades citadas anteriormente que ofrece la aplicación. El sistema está desarrollado en Java utilizando el IDE Android Studio y puede utilizarse en cualquier dispositivo que disponga de Android 4.0 o superior como sistema operativo.
    [Show full text]
  • Specular Reflection from the Great Pyramid at Giza
    Specular Reflection from the Great Pyramid at Giza Donald E. Jennings Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA (retired) email: [email protected] Posted to arXiv: physics.hist-ph April 6, 2021 Abstract The pyramids of ancient Egypt are said to have shone brilliantly in the sun. Surfaces of polished limestone would not only have reflected diffusely in all directions, but would also likely have produced specular reflections in particular directions. Reflections toward points on the horizon would have been visible from large distances. On a particular day and time when the sun was properly situated, an observer stationed at a distant site would have seen a momentary flash as the sun’s reflection moved across the face of the pyramid. The positions of the sun that are reflected to the horizon are confined to narrow arcs in the sky, one arc for each side of the pyramid. We model specular reflections from the pyramid of Khufu and derive the annual dates and times when they would have been visible at important ancient sites. Certain of these events might have coincided with significant dates on the Egyptian calendar, as well as with solar equinoxes, solstices and cross-quarter days. The celebration of Wepet-Renpet, which at the time of the pyramid’s construction occurred near the spring cross-quarter day, would have been marked by a specular sweep of sites on the southern horizon. On the autumn and winter cross-quarter days reflections would have been directed to Heliopolis. We suggest that on those days the pyramidion of Khafre might have been visible in specular reflection over the truncated top of Khufu’s pyramid.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyramid of Unas : 11 Unas (Unis)(C. 2356
    11 : Pyramid of Unas . Unas (Unis)(c. 2356 - 2323 BC) was the last king of the Fifth Dynasty. The pyramid dedicated to this king lies to the south of the Step Pyramid. The Pyramid of Unas (Unis) is in poor condition however, the burial chambers are worth the visit. In this chamber, you will find the earliest Egyptian funerary texts carved into the walls and filled with a blue pigment. These are referred to as the Pyramid Texts. They are the rituals and hymns that were said during the in the walls of the pyramids. burial. Before this time, nothing was engraved The pyramid, when it was complete stood about 62 ft (18.5 m). The core of the pyramid was loose blocks and rubble and the casing was of limestone. Today it looks like a pile of dirt and rubble, especially from the east side. Although the outside of the pyramid is in ruin, the inside is still sound. You may enter the pyramid from the north side. Trying to block the way, are three huge slabs of granite. Once inside the chamber, you will find the Pyramid Texts that were intended to help the pharaoh's soul in the afterworld. They were to help the soul find Re, the sun god. 12 : Pyramid of Pepi II . South Saqqara is completely separate from Saqqara. It is located about 1km south of the pyramid of Sekhemkhet, which is the most southern of all the pyramids in Saqqara. South Saqqara was founded in the 6th Dynasty (2345 - 2181 BC) by the pharaohs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis
    Answers Research Journal 4 (2011):127–159. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v4/ancient-egyptian-chronology-genesis.pdf Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis Matt McClellan, [email protected] Abstract One of the most popular topics among young earth creationists and apologists is the relationship of the Bible with Ancient Egyptian chronology. Whether it concerns who the pharaoh of the Exodus was, the background of Joseph, or the identity of Shishak, many Christians (and non-Christians) have wondered how these two topics fit together. This paper deals with the question, “How does ancient Egyptian chronology correlate with the book of Genesis?” In answering this question it begins with an analysis of every Egyptian dynasty starting with the 12th Dynasty (this is where David Down places Moses) and goes back all the way to the so called “Dynasty 0.” After all the data is presented, this paper will look at the different possibilities that can be constructed concerning how long each of these dynasties lasted and how they relate to the biblical dates of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and the Patriarchs. Keywords: Egypt, pharaoh, Patriarchs, chronology, Abraham, Joseph Introduction Kingdom) need to be revised. This is important During the past century some scholars have when considering the relationship between Egyptian proposed new ways of dating the events of ancient history and the Tower of Babel. The traditional dating history before c. 700 BC.1 In 1991 a book entitled of Ancient Egyptian chronology places its earliest Centuries of Darkness by Peter James and four of dynasties before the biblical dates of the Flood and his colleagues shook the very foundations of ancient confusion of the languages at Babel.
    [Show full text]
  • Beepop Curriculum
    PASCUA YAQUI SUMMER PROGRAM A Joint Endeavor of Pasqua Yaqui Tribe Carl Hayden Bee Research Center University of Arizona, School of Mathematical Sciences June 9 - July 11, 2014 BEEPOP The Population Dynamics of the Honey Bee in the Hive and in the Wild I. Sizing up the Population Reading: Bee Hives Materials: • Map of New Pascua • Frames with comb, brood, and honey • Frames with foundation Classroom Activities: Census Methods • Estimating the number of saguaros on a reserve • Estimating the number of fish in a lake • Estimating the population of a village 1 Bee Hives Long ago, people from many parts of the world discovered that they could increase honey production by creating a special envi- ronment for bee hives. Today, apiculture, the science of beekeeping, is a comprehensive sci- entific and technological enterprise. Beekeep- ers study topics from the anatomy and physi- ology of bees to their evolution, genetics, and ecology. The best beekeepers are those who can combine scientific knowledge with practi- cal skills to manage their hives and to process and market honey. We know, from pictures on the of the Egyp- tian sun temple of Nyuserre Ini from the 5th Dynasty, dated earlier than 2422 BC, that bee have been kept in artificial hives for more that 4500 years. The pictures on these walls depict workers blowing smoke into hives as they remove honeycombs. The first human-made hives were quite variable in size and shape. They were made Figure 1: Medieval beekeeper working with by these ancient beekeepers from material bees in a skep, conical basket for housing sees that was readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • Mejora Del Comando En Ps En Minix
    MEJORA DEL COMANDO PS EN MINIX. INGENIERIA TECNICA INFORMATICA DE GESTION 2007 1 INTRODUCCIÓN......................................................................................................................................3 OBJETIVO .................................................................................................................................................3 FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS.................................................................................................................3 • FICHERO MINIX/PROC.H.....................................................................................................................3 • FICHERO MINIX/CONF.H.....................................................................................................................3 • FICHERO MINIX/CONFIG.H ................................................................................................................3 • FICHERO MINIX/MPROG.H..................................................................................................................3 • FICHERO USR/LOCAL/SMX/SRC/FS/FPROG.H.......................................................................................4 DESCRIPCIÓN DEL TRABAJO REALIZADO....................................................................................4 PASOS SEGUIDOS PARA LA CREACIÓN DEL PROYECTO..........................................................5 CONCLUSIONES......................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]