DOCSLIB.ORG

Program of the Sessions Atlanta, Georgia, January 4–7, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Program of the Sessions Atlanta, Georgia, January 4–7, 2017 Program of the Sessions Atlanta, Georgia, January 4–7, 2017 3:15PM Concentration in first-passage Monday, January 2 (4) percolation. AMS Short Course on Random Growth Philippe Sosoe,HarvardUniversity (1125-60-3157) Models, Part I NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop 9:00 AM –4:30PM M301, Marquis Level, Marriott Marquis 3:00 PM –6:00PM A707, Atrium Level, Marriott Marquis Organizers: Michael Damron,Georgia Institute of Technology AMS Short Course Reception Firas Rassoul-Agha, University of Utah 4:30 PM –5:30PM M302, Marquis Timo Sepp¨al¨ainen, Level, Marriott Marquis University of Wisconsin at Madison 8:00AM Registration 9:00AM Introduction to random growth models, I. Tuesday, January 3 (1) Michael Damron, Georgia Institute of Technology (1125-60-3158) AMS Department Chairs Workshop 10:15AM Break 8:00 AM –6:30PM M103, M104 & M105, 10:45AM Introduction to random growth models, Marquis Level, Marriott Marquis (2) II. Michael Damron, Georgia Institute of Presenters: Malcolm Adams,University Technology of Georgia Matthew Ando, NOON Break University of Illinois at 1:30PM Infinite geodesics, asymptotic directions, Urbana-Champaign (3) and Busemann functions. Krista Maxson,Universityof Jack Hanson, The City College of New Science & Arts of Oklahoma York (1125-60-3159) Douglas Mupasiri, 3:15PM Break University of Northern Iowa The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 38, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes. The time limit for each MAA contributed of papers presented to the American Mathematical Society, paper varies. In the Special Sessions the time limit varies ordered according to the numbers in parentheses following from session to session and within sessions. To maintain the the listings. The middle two digits, e.g., 897-20-1136, refer to schedule, time limits will be strictly enforced. the Mathematical Reviews subject classification assigned by Forpaperswithmorethanoneauthor,an asterisk follows the individual author. Groups of papers for each subject are the name of the author who plans to present the paper at the listed chronologically in the Abstracts. The last one to four meeting. digits, e.g., 897-20-1136, refer to the receipt number of the Papers flagged with a solid triangle () have been desig- abstract; abstracts are further sorted by the receipt number nated by the author as being of possible interest to under- within each classification. MAA abstracts are listed toward graduate students. the back of the issue sorted by session name. Abstracts of papers presented in the sessions at this 59 Program of the Sessions – Tuesday, January 3 (cont’d.) AMS Short Course on Random Growth Joint Meetings Registration Models, Part II 7:30 AM –6:00PM Grand Hall Lobby, 9:00 AM –4:30PM M301, Marquis Level, Marriott Marquis Exhibit Level, Hyatt Regency Organizers: Michael Damron,Georgia Email Center Institute of Technology Firas Rassoul-Agha, University of Utah 7:30 AM – 10:00 PM Exhibit Level Prefunction Area, Hyatt Regency Timo Sepp¨al¨ainen, University of Wisconsin at Madison AMS-MAA-SIAM Special Session on Research in Mathematics by Undergraduates and 9:00AM Busemann functions, geodesics, and the (5) competition interface for directed Students in Post-Baccalaureate Programs, I percolation. Firas Rassoul-Agha,UniversityofUtah 8:00 AM –10:50AM International 8, (1125-60-3130) International Level, Marriott Marquis 10:15AM Break 10:45AM Stationary versions and fluctuation Organizers: Darren A. Narayan, (6) exponents for the exactly solvable Rochester Institute of stochastic corner growth model. Technology Timo Sepp¨al¨ainen,Universityof Wisconsin-Madison (1125-60-3108) Tamas Forgacs, California NOON Break State University, Fresno 2:00PM KPZ fluctuations in exactly solvable (7) models, I. Ugur Abdulla,Florida Ivan Z. Corwin, Columbia University Institute of Technology (1125-60-3107) 8:00AM Ballast Cleaning Scheduling 2:45PM Break (9) Optimization. 3:15PM KPZ fluctuations in exactly solvable Meghan Stuart*, University of (8) models, II. Tennessee, Jorge Cisneros Paz,The Ivan Z. Corwin, Columbia University University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, (1125-60-3179) Mar´ıa Jos´eP´erez Pereda, Instituto Tecnologico´ Autonomo´ de M´exico, and MAA Board of Governors Navdha Malhotra, Delhi Technological University (1125-00-618) 9:00 AM –5:00PM Imperial Ballroom A, Marquis Level, Marriott Marquis 8:30AM Isoperimetry in Euclidean Space with (10) Different Perimeter and Volume AMS Council Densities. Leo Di Giosia, Lewis & Clark College, 2:30 PM – 10:00 PM Imperial Ballroom B, Jahanger Habib, Williams College, Lea Marquis Level, Marriott Marquis Kenigsberg*, Stony Brook University, Weitao Zhu and Dylinger Pittman, Joint Meetings Registration Williams College (1125-51-750) 3:00 PM –7:00PM Grand Hall Lobby, 9:00AM Second Minimal Orbits, Sharkovski Exhibit Level, Hyatt Regency (11) Ordering, and Universality in Chaos. Ugur G. Abdulla, Florida Institute of Advanced registration will remain open Technology, Rashad U Abdulla*, until 7:30 pm University of Pennsylvania, Emily Ribando-Gros, Louisiana State Email Center University, Muhammad U Abdulla and Naveed Iqbal, Florida Institute of 3:00 PM –8:00PM Exhibit Level Prefunction Technology (1125-37-90) Area, Hyatt Regency 9:30AM Qualitative Properties of Solutions to (12) the Nonlinear Parabolic PDEs with Double-Degenerate Fast Diffusion. Wednesday, January 4 Ugur G. Abdulla, Florida Institute of Technology, Montie Avery,Universityof MAA Minority Chairs Meeting New Mexico, Jian Du, Florida Institute of Technology, Naba Mukhtar*, Bucknell 7:00 AM –8:45AM University, Conference University, and Adam Prinkey,Florida Level, Hyatt Regency Institute of Technology (1125-35-91) 60 Wednesday, January 4 – Program of the Sessions 10:00AM Evolution of Free Boundaries for the 10:30AM Mutli-Cultural Networks Under Internal (13) Nonlinear Fokker-Planck Equation with (20) and External Stochastic Perturbations. Reaction. Preliminary report. Ugur G. Abdulla, Lamees Alzaki,Florida Kristina B. Hilton*andG. S. Institute of Technology, Robert Balkin*, Ladde, University of South Florida Colorado School of Mines, Jian Du, (1125-91-1038) Florida Institute of Technology, and Elizabeth Schloss, Auburn University AMS Special Session on Analytical and (1125-35-92) Computational Studies in Mathematical 10:30AM Fr´echet Differentiability in Optimal Biology, I (14) Control of the Stefan Problem. Ugur G. Abdulla, Florida Institute of 8:00 AM –10:50AM L405 & L406, Lobby Technology, R. Beekie*, University of Level, Marriott Marquis Minnesota, Twin Cities, V. Bukshtynov, Organizers: Yanyu Xiao,Universityof E. Cosgrove, J. Jones, S. Seif,Florida Cincinnati Institute of Technology, and N. Wubshet, Augustana University (1125-35-93) Xiang-Sheng Wang, University of Louisiana at AMS Special Session on Analysis of Lafayette Fractional, Stochastic, and Hybrid Dynamic 8:00AM Stabilization in a Chemostat with Systems and their Applications, I (21) Sampled and Delayed Measurements. Michael Malisoff, Louisiana State University (1125-92-156) 8:00 AM –10:50AM M301, Marquis 8:30AM Modeling Multi-Epitope HIV/CTL Immune Level, Marriott Marquis (22) Response Dynamics and Evolution. Cameron J Browne,Universityof Organizers: Aghalaya S. Vatsala, Louisiana at Lafayette (1125-92-793) University of Louisiana at Lafayette 9:00AM Modeling environmental transmission of (23) MAP infection. Gangaram S. Ladde, Suzanne Lenhart*, University of University of South Florida Tennessee and NIMBioS, Kokum DeSilva, University of Peradeniya, Sri John R. Graef,Universityof Lanka, and Shigetoshi Eda,Uof Tennessee at Chattanooga Tennessee, Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries (1125-92-451) 8:00AM Monotone iterative tehniques for (15) Riemann Liouville fractional 9:30AM A Model for the Interaction of integro–differential equations with initial (24) Phytoplankton Aggregates and the condition. Environment: Approximation and J. Diego Ramirez*, Savannah State Parameter Estimation. University, and Zachary Denton,North Azmy S. Ackleh*, University of Louisiana Carolina A&T University (1125-34-530) at Lafayette, and Robert Miller,C.H. Fenstermaker & Associates, L.L.C. 8:30AM Weak solutions for nonlinear Neumann (1125-92-1836) (16) boundary value problems with 10:00AM From Fibonacci to Alfred Lotka and p(x)-Laplacian operators. (25) beyond: Modeling the dynamics of Lingju Kong, University of Tennessee at population and age-structures. Chattanooga (1125-35-753) Arni S.R. Srinivasa Rao*, Augusta 9:00AM The existence of positive solutions of a University, and James R. Carey, (17) fractional boundary value problem. University of California, Davis John R Graef, Lingju Kong,Universityof (1125-92-160) Tennessee at Chattanooga, Qingkai 10:30AM Age-structure model with periodic Kong, Northern Illinois University, (26) mature probability. Preliminary report. and Min Wang*, Rowan University Xiang-Sheng Wang,Universityof (1125-34-832) Louisiana at Lafayette (1125-92-2216) 9:30AM Parameter Identification For The SEIRS AMS Special Session on Arithmetic Properties (18) Epidemic Model: Case Study Influenza. Preliminary report. of Sequences from Number Theory and Olusegun Michael Otunuga, Marshall Combinatorics, I University (1125-37-930) 8:00 AM –10:50AM M101, Marquis 10:00AM A Generalized Stochastic SEIRS Epidemic Level, Marriott Marquis (19) Dynamic Model for Vector-borne Diseases with three Distributed Delays and Organizers: Eric Rowland,Hofstra Nonlinear Incidence. University DWanduku, Georgia Southern University Armin Straub,Universityof (1125-60-941) South
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Treewidth and Graph Minors
    On Treewidth and Graph Minors Daniel John Harvey Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2014 Department of Mathematics and Statistics The University of Melbourne Produced on archival quality paper ii Abstract Both treewidth and the Hadwiger number are key graph parameters in structural and al- gorithmic graph theory, especially in the theory of graph minors. For example, treewidth demarcates the two major cases of the Robertson and Seymour proof of Wagner's Con- jecture. Also, the Hadwiger number is the key measure of the structural complexity of a graph. In this thesis, we shall investigate these parameters on some interesting classes of graphs. The treewidth of a graph defines, in some sense, how \tree-like" the graph is. Treewidth is a key parameter in the algorithmic field of fixed-parameter tractability. In particular, on classes of bounded treewidth, certain NP-Hard problems can be solved in polynomial time. In structural graph theory, treewidth is of key interest due to its part in the stronger form of Robertson and Seymour's Graph Minor Structure Theorem. A key fact is that the treewidth of a graph is tied to the size of its largest grid minor. In fact, treewidth is tied to a large number of other graph structural parameters, which this thesis thoroughly investigates. In doing so, some of the tying functions between these results are improved. This thesis also determines exactly the treewidth of the line graph of a complete graph. This is a critical example in a recent paper of Marx, and improves on a recent result by Grohe and Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT EVENTS BULLETIN Friday, January 8, 2016, 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM Room 4C-3 Washington State Convention Center Joint Mathematics Meetings, Seattle, WA
    A MERICAN M ATHEMATICAL S OCIETY CURRENT EVENTS BULLETIN Friday, January 8, 2016, 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM Room 4C-3 Washington State Convention Center Joint Mathematics Meetings, Seattle, WA 1:00 PM Carina Curto, Pennsylvania State University What can topology tell us about the neural code? Surprising new applications of what used to be thought of as “pure” mathematics. 2:00 PM Yuval Peres, Microsoft Research and University of California, Berkeley, and Lionel Levine, Cornell University Laplacian growth, sandpiles and scaling limits Striking large-scale structure arising from simple cellular automata. 3:00 PM Timothy Gowers, Cambridge University Probabilistic combinatorics and the recent work of Peter Keevash The major existence conjecture for combinatorial designs has been proven! 4:00 PM Amie Wilkinson, University of Chicago What are Lyapunov exponents, and why are they interesting? A basic tool in understanding the predictability of physical systems, explained. Organized by David Eisenbud, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Introduction to the Current Events Bulletin Will the Riemann Hypothesis be proved this week? What is the Geometric Langlands Conjecture about? How could you best exploit a stream of data flowing by too fast to capture? I think we mathematicians are provoked to ask such questions by our sense that underneath the vastness of mathematics is a fundamental unity allowing us to look into many different corners -- though we couldn't possibly work in all of them. I love the idea of having an expert explain such things to me in a brief, accessible way. And I, like most of us, love common-room gossip.
    [Show full text]
  • Manjul Bhargava
    The Work of Manjul Bhargava Manjul Bhargava's work in number theory has had a profound influence on the field. A mathematician of extraordinary creativity, he has a taste for simple problems of timeless beauty, which he has solved by developing elegant and powerful new methods that offer deep insights. When he was a graduate student, Bhargava read the monumental Disqui- sitiones Arithmeticae, a book about number theory by Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855). All mathematicians know of the Disquisitiones, but few have actually read it, as its notation and computational nature make it difficult for modern readers to follow. Bhargava nevertheless found the book to be a wellspring of inspiration. Gauss was interested in binary quadratic forms, which are polynomials ax2 +bxy +cy2, where a, b, and c are integers. In the Disquisitiones, Gauss developed his ingenious composition law, which gives a method for composing two binary quadratic forms to obtain a third one. This law became, and remains, a central tool in algebraic number theory. After wading through the 20 pages of Gauss's calculations culminating in the composition law, Bhargava knew there had to be a better way. Then one day, while playing with a Rubik's cube, he found it. Bhargava thought about labeling each corner of a cube with a number and then slic- ing the cube to obtain 2 sets of 4 numbers. Each 4-number set naturally forms a matrix. A simple calculation with these matrices resulted in a bi- nary quadratic form. From the three ways of slicing the cube, three binary quadratic forms emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey Hoffstein Jill Pipher Joseph H. Silverman
    Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics Je rey Ho stein Jill Pipher Joseph H. Silverman An Introduction to Mathematical Cryptography Second Edition Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics Series Editors: Sheldon Axler San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA Kenneth Ribet University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA Advisory Board: Colin Adams, Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA Alejandro Adem, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Ruth Charney, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA Irene M. Gamba, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA Roger E. Howe, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA David Jerison, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Jeffrey C. Lagarias, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Jill Pipher, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA Fadil Santosa, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA Amie Wilkinson, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics are generally aimed at third- and fourth- year undergraduate mathematics students at North American universities. These texts strive to provide students and teachers with new perspectives and novel approaches. The books include motivation that guides the reader to an appreciation of interre- lations among different aspects of the subject. They feature examples that illustrate key concepts as well as exercises that strengthen understanding. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/666 Jeffrey Hoffstein • Jill Pipher Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …
    MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …......……………………. 2 Innovations ………………………………………………………..... 2 Scientific Highlights …..…………………………………………… 4 MSRI Experiences ….……………………………………………… 6 II. Programs …………………………………………………………………….. 13 III. Workshops ……………………………………………………………………. 17 IV. Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………………………………. 19 Papers by Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………… 21 V. Mathematics Education and Awareness …...………………………………. 23 VI. Industrial Participation ...…………………………………………………… 26 VII. Future Programs …………………………………………………………….. 28 VIII. Collaborations ………………………………………………………………… 30 IX. Papers Reported by Members ………………………………………………. 35 X. Appendix - Final Reports ……………………………………………………. 45 Programs Workshops Summer Graduate Workshops MSRI Network Conferences MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 This annual report covers MSRI projects and activities that have been concluded since the submission of the last report in May, 2005. This includes the Spring, 2005 semester programs, the 2005 summer graduate workshops, the Fall, 2005 programs and the January and February workshops of Spring, 2006. This report does not contain fiscal or demographic data. Those data will be submitted in the Fall, 2006 final report covering the completed fiscal 2006 year, based on audited financial reports. This report begins with a discussion of MSRI innovations undertaken this year, followed by highlights
    [Show full text]
  • President's Report
    Newsletter Volume 42, No. 5 • SePTemBeR–oCT oBeR 2012 PRESIDENT’S REPORT AWM Prize Winners. I am pleased to announce the winners of two of the three major prizes given by AWM at the Joint Mathematics Meetings (JMM). The Louise Hay Award is given to Amy Cohen, Rutgers University, in recognition of The purpose of the Association her “contributions to mathematics education through her writings, her talks, and for Women in Mathematics is her outstanding service to professional organizations.” The Gweneth Humphreys • to encourage women and girls to Award is given to James Morrow, University of Washington, in recognition of study and to have active careers in his “outstanding achievements in inspiring undergraduate women to discover and the mathematical sciences, and • to promote equal opportunity and pursue their passion for mathematics.” I quote from the citations written by the the equal treatment of women and selection committees and extend warm congratulations to the honorees. These girls in the mathematical sciences. awards will be presented at the Prize Session at JMM 2013 in San Diego. Congratulations to Raman Parimala, Emory University, who will present the AWM Noether Lecture at JMM 2013, entitled “A Hasse Principle for Quadratic Forms over Function Fields.” She is honored for her groundbreaking research in theory of quadratic forms, hermitian forms, linear algebraic groups, and Galois cohomology. The Noether Lecture is the oldest of the three named AWM Lectures. (The Falconer Lecture is presented at MathFest, and the Sonia Kovalevsky at the SIAM Annual Meeting.) The first Noether Lecture was given by F. Jessie MacWilliams in 1980 in recognition of her fundamental contributions to the theory of error correcting codes.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Lyapunov Exponents, and Why Are They Interesting?
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 54, Number 1, January 2017, Pages 79–105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1552 Article electronically published on September 6, 2016 WHAT ARE LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS, AND WHY ARE THEY INTERESTING? AMIE WILKINSON Introduction At the 2014 International Congress of Mathematicians in Seoul, South Korea, Franco-Brazilian mathematician Artur Avila was awarded the Fields Medal for “his profound contributions to dynamical systems theory, which have changed the face of the field, using the powerful idea of renormalization as a unifying principle.”1 Although it is not explicitly mentioned in this citation, there is a second unify- ing concept in Avila’s work that is closely tied with renormalization: Lyapunov (or characteristic) exponents. Lyapunov exponents play a key role in three areas of Avila’s research: smooth ergodic theory, billiards and translation surfaces, and the spectral theory of 1-dimensional Schr¨odinger operators. Here we take the op- portunity to explore these areas and reveal some underlying themes connecting exponents, chaotic dynamics and renormalization. But first, what are Lyapunov exponents? Let’s begin by viewing them in one of their natural habitats: the iterated barycentric subdivision of a triangle. When the midpoint of each side of a triangle is connected to its opposite vertex by a line segment, the three resulting segments meet in a point in the interior of the triangle. The barycentric subdivision of a triangle is the collection of 6 smaller triangles determined by these segments and the edges of the original triangle: Figure 1. Barycentric subdivision. Received by the editors August 2, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Average Degree Conditions Forcing a Minor∗
    Average degree conditions forcing a minor∗ Daniel J. Harvey David R. Wood School of Mathematical Sciences Monash University Melbourne, Australia [email protected], [email protected] Submitted: Jun 11, 2015; Accepted: Feb 22, 2016; Published: Mar 4, 2016 Mathematics Subject Classifications: 05C83 Abstract Mader first proved that high average degree forces a given graph as a minor. Often motivated by Hadwiger's Conjecture, much research has focused on the av- erage degree required to force a complete graph as a minor. Subsequently, various authors have considered the average degree required to force an arbitrary graph H as a minor. Here, we strengthen (under certain conditions) a recent result by Reed and Wood, giving better bounds on the average degree required to force an H-minor when H is a sparse graph with many high degree vertices. This solves an open problem of Reed and Wood, and also generalises (to within a constant factor) known results when H is an unbalanced complete bipartite graph. 1 Introduction Mader [13, 14] first proved that high average degree forces a given graph as a minor1. In particular, Mader [13, 14] proved that the following function is well-defined, where d(G) denotes the average degree of a graph G: f(H) := inffD 2 R : every graph G with d(G) > D contains an H-minorg: Often motivated by Hadwiger's Conjecture (see [18]), much research has focused on f(Kt) where Kt is the complete graph on t vertices. For 3 6 t 6 9, exact bounds on the number of edges due to Mader [14], Jørgensen [6], and Song and Thomas [19] implyp that f(Kt) = 2t−4.
    [Show full text]
  • August 1995 Council Minutes
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY COUNCIL MINUTES Burlington, Vermont 05 August 1995 Abstract The Council of the American Mathematical Society met at 1:00 p.m. on Satur- day, 05 August 1995, in the Emerald Grand Ballroom in the Sheraton Burlington, Burlington, Vermont. These are the minutes for the meeting. Members present were Georgia Benkart, Joan Birman, Robert Daverman (vot- ing Associate Secretary), David Epstein, Robert Fossum, John Franks, Ron Gra- ham, Steven Krantz, Andy Magid (Associate Secretary), Cathleen Morawetz, Frank Morgan, Franklin Peterson, Marc Rieffel, Cora Sadosky, Norberto Salinas, Peter Shalen, Lesley Sibner (Associate Secretary), B. A. Taylor, Jean Taylor, and Sylvia Wiegand. Staff and others invited to attend were Don Babbitt (Publisher), Annalisa Cran- nell (Committee on the Profession Representative), Chandler Davis (Canadian Mathematical Society Representative), John Ewing (Executive Director), Tim Gog- gins (Development Officer), Carolyn Gordon (Editorial Boards Committee Repre- sentative), Jim Lewis (Committee on Science Policy Chair), James Maxwell (AED), Don McClure (Trustee), Susan Montgomery (Trustee), Everett Pitcher (Former Secretary), Sam Rankin (AED), and Kelly Young (Assistant to the Secretary). President Morawetz presided. 1 2 CONTENTS Contents IAGENDA 4 0 CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS. 4 1MINUTES 4 1.1March95Council...................................... 4 1.2 05/95 Meeting of the Executive Committee and Board of Trustees. 4 2 CONSENT AGENDA. 4 2.1Resolutions......................................... 4 2.1.1 Exxon Foundation. ......................... 4 2.2CommitteeAdministration................................ 5 2.2.1 Dischargewiththanks............................... 5 2.2.2 CommitteeCharges................................ 5 3 REPORTS OF BOARDS AND STANDING COMMITTEES. 5 3.1 EDITORIAL BOARDS COMMITTEE (EBC). .................. 5 3.1.1 TransactionsandMemoirsEditorialCommittee................. 5 3.1.2 Journal of the AMS .
    [Show full text]
  • ICTS POSTER Outside Bangalore
    T A T A I N S T I T U T E O F F U N D A M E N T A L R E S E A R C H A HOMI BHABHA BIRTH CENTENARY & ICTS INAUGURAL EVENT International Centre Theoretical Sciences science without bo28 Decemberun 2009d29 -a 31 Decemberri e2009s Satish Dhawan Auditorium Faculty Hall Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. www.icts.res.in/program/icts-ie INVITED SPEAKERS / PANELISTS INCLUDE FOUNDATION STONE CEREMONY Siva Athreya ISI, Bangalore OF ICTS CAMPUS Naama Barkai Weizmann Institute The foundation stone will be unveiled by Manjul Bhargava Princeton University Prof. C N R Rao, FRS 4:00 pm, 28 December 2009 Édouard Brézin École Normale Supérieure Amol Dighe TIFR Michael Green DAMTP, Cambridge Chandrashekhar Khare UCLA Yamuna Krishnan NCBS-TIFR Lyman Page Princeton University Jaikumar Radhakrishnan TIFR C. S. Rajan TIFR Sriram Ramaswamy IISc G. Rangarajan IISc C. N. R. Rao JNCASR Subir Sachdev Harvard University K. Sandeep CAM-TIFR Sriram Shastry UC Santa Cruz PUBLIC LECTURES Ashoke Sen HRI J. N. Tata Auditorium, IISc (FREE AND OPEN TO ALL) Anirvan Sengupta Rutgers University K. R. Sreenivasan Abdus Salam ICTP Michael Atiyah University of Edinburgh Andrew Strominger Harvard University Truth and Beauty in Mathematics and Physics 5:30 pm, 27 December 2009 Raman Sundrum Johns Hopkins University Ajay Sood IISc David Gross KITP, Santa Barbara The Role of Theory in Science Tarun Souradeep IUCAA 5:30 pm, 28 December 2009 Eitan Tadmor University of Maryland Albert Libchaber Rockefeller University Sandip Trivedi TIFR The Origin of Life: from Geophysics to Biology? Mukund Thattai NCBS-TIFR 5:30 pm, 30 December 2009 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Meetings & Conferences of the AMS, Volume 49, Number 5
    Meetings & Conferences of the AMS IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING MEETINGS PROGRAMS: AMS Sectional Meeting programs do not appear in the print version of the Notices. However, comprehensive and continually updated meeting and program information with links to the abstract for each talk can be found on the AMS website.See http://www.ams.org/meetings/. Programs and abstracts will continue to be displayed on the AMS website in the Meetings and Conferences section until about three weeks after the meeting is over. Final programs for Sectional Meetings will be archived on the AMS website in an electronic issue of the Notices as noted below for each meeting. Niky Kamran, McGill University, Wave equations in Kerr Montréal, Quebec geometry. Rafael de la Llave, University of Texas at Austin, Title to Canada be announced. Centre de Recherches Mathématiques, Special Sessions Université de Montréal Asymptotics for Random Matrix Models and Their Appli- cations, Nicholas M. Ercolani, University of Arizona, and May 3–5, 2002 Kenneth T.-R. McLaughlin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and University of Arizona. Meeting #976 Combinatorial Hopf Algebras, Marcelo Aguiar, Texas A&M Eastern Section University, and François Bergeron and Christophe Associate secretary: Lesley M. Sibner Reutenauer, Université du Québec á Montréal. Announcement issue of Notices: March 2002 Combinatorial and Geometric Group Theory, Olga G. Khar- Program first available on AMS website: March 21, 2002 lampovich, McGill University, Alexei Myasnikov and Program issue of electronic Notices: May 2002 Vladimir Shpilrain, City College, New York, and Daniel Issue of Abstracts: Volume 23, Issue 3 Wise, McGill University. Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry, Irena Deadlines Peeva, Cornell University, and Hema Srinivasan, Univer- For organizers: Expired sity of Missouri-Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS and THEIR GRADED VERSION 0.1. Let
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 2, Number 3, July 1989 AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS AND THEIR GRADED VERSION GEORGE LUSZTIG Dedicated to Sir Michael Atiyah on his sixtieth birthday INTRODUCTION 0.1. Let Hvo be an affine Hecke algebra with parameter Vo E C* assumed to be of infinite order. (The basis elements ~ E Hvo corresponding to simple reflections s satisfy (~+ 1)(Ts - v~C(s») = 0, where c(s) EN depend on s and are subject only to c(s) = c(s') whenever s, Sf are conjugate in the affine Weyl group.) Such Hecke algebras appear naturally in the representation theory of semisimple p-adic groups, and understanding their representation theory is a question of considerable interest. Consider the "special case" where c(s) is independent of s and the coroots generate a direct summand. In this "special case," the question above has been studied in [I] and a classification of the simple modules was obtained. The approach of [1] was based on equivariant K-theory. This approach can be attempted in the general case (some indications are given in [5, 0.3]), but there appear to be some serious difficulties in carrying it out. 0.2. On the other hand, in [5] we introduced some algebras H,o' depending on a parameter roE C , which are graded analogues of Hvo . The graded algebras H '0 are in many respects simpler than Hvo' and in [5] the representation theory of H,o is studied using equivariant homology. Moreover, we can make the machinery of intersection cohomology work for us in the study of H '0 ' while in the K-theory context of Hvo it is not clear how to do this.
    [Show full text]